The Spiritualism of Adventism
What is the final delusion that takes the world captive? What is its nature? Does
sanity prevail one day then delusion the next? I see a gradual process of worldwide
deception — regarding the judgment — that is deceiving the world and the church.
Let’s expose super-spiritual spiritualism and the denial of the judgment in modern
times. Let us discuss its impact on faithful Seventh-day Adventists.
For an introduction, I will quickly trace the unfolding of the ever-intensifying delusion,
beginning with the signs that were already evident in the 1890’s. All quotes are from
Ellen G. White’s classic work, The Great Controversy. The purpose of the words
highlighted in bold or italics is not to change the author’s original 19th century
emphasis but to merely call your attention to thoughts and ideas already present in
the text. —The Editor.
“Satan has long been preparing for his final effort to deceive the world. ... Little
by little he has prepared the way for his masterpiece of deception in the
development of spiritualism. He has not yet reached the full accomplishment
of his designs; but it will be reached in the last remnant of time. Says the
prophet: ‘I saw three unclean spirits like frogs; . . . they are the spirits of devils,
working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole
world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.’ Revelation
16:13, 14. Except those who are kept by the power of God, through faith in His
word, the whole world will be swept into the ranks of this delusion. The people
are fast being lulled to a fatal security, to be awakened only by the outpouring
of the wrath of God.” —The Great Controversy, pp. 561-562.
The Message
“Satan is making the world believe that the Bible is a mere fiction, or at least a
book suited to the infancy of the race, but now to be lightly regarded, or cast
aside as obsolete.” —The Great Controversy, p. 557. “And to complete his work,
he declares, through the spirits that ‘true knowledge places man above all law;’
that ‘whatever is, is right;’ that ‘God doth not condemn;’ and that ‘all sins which
are committed are innocent.’ ” —The Great Controversy, p. 555.
“If there were no other evidence of the real character of spiritualism, it should
be enough for the Christian that the spirits make no difference between
righteousness and sin. ... Satan says to the world: ‘No matter how wicked you
are; no matter whether you believe or disbelieve God and the Bible. Live as you
please; heaven is your home.’ The spiritualist teachers virtually declare:
‘Everyone that doeth evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and He delighteth in
them; or, Where is the God of judgment?’ Malachi 2:17. Saith the word of God:
‘Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light,
and light for darkness.’ Isaiah 5:20. —The Great Controversy, pp. 556-557.
“It is true that spiritualism is now changing its form and, veiling some of its
more objectionable features, is assuming a Christian guise. ... While it formerly
denounced Christ and the Bible, it now professes to accept both. But the Bible is
interpreted in a manner that is pleasing to the unrenewed heart, while its
solemn and vital truths are made of no effect. Love is dwelt upon as the chief
attribute of God, but it is degraded to a weak sentimentalism, making little
distinction between good and evil. God’s justice, His denunciations of sin, the
requirements of His holy law, are all kept out of sight.” —The Great
Controversy, pp. 557-558.
“In the truths of His word, God has given to men a revelation of Himself; and to
all who accept them they are a shield against the deceptions of Satan. It is a
neglect of these truths that has opened the door to the evils which are now
becoming so widespread in the religious world. ...
“Professor Edwards A. Park, in setting forth the current religious perils, ably
says: ‘One source of danger is the neglect of the pulpit to enforce the divine
law. In former days the pulpit was an echo of the voice of conscience. ...Our
most illustrious preachers gave a wonderful majesty to their discourses by
following the example of the Master, and giving prominence to the law, its
precepts, and its threatenings. They repeated the two great maxims, that the
law is a transcript of the divine perfections, and that a man who does not love
the law does not love the gospel; for the law, as well as the gospel, is a mirror
reflecting the true character of God. This peril leads to another, that of
underrating the evil of sin, the extent of it, the demerit of it. In proportion to the
rightfulness of the commandment is the wrongfulness of disobeying it....
“Affiliated to the dangers already named is the danger of underestimating the
justice of God. The tendency of the modern pulpit is to strain out the divine
justice from the divine benevolence, to sink benevolence into a sentiment rather
than exalt it into a principle. The new theological prism puts asunder what God
has joined together. Is the divine law a good or an evil? It is good. Then justice
is good; for it is a disposition to execute the law. From the habit of underrating
the divine law and justice, the extent and demerit of human disobedience, men
easily slide into the habit of underestimating the grace which has provided an
atonement for sin.’ Thus the gospel loses its value and importance in the minds
of men, and soon they are ready practically to cast aside the Bible itself.” —The
Great Controversy, pp. 464-466.
“The prophet Isaiah brings to view the fearful deception which will come upon
the wicked, causing them to count themselves secure from the judgments of
God: ‘We have made a covenant with death, and with hell we are at agreement;
when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for
we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves.’
Isaiah 28:15. In the class here described are included those who in their
stubborn impenitence comfort themselves with the assurance that there is to
be no punishment for the sinner...
“Marvelous beyond expression is the blindness of the people of this generation.
Thousands reject the word of God as unworthy of belief and with eager
confidence receive the deceptions of Satan. Skeptics and scoffers denounce
the bigotry of those who contend for the faith of the prophets and apostles, and
they divert themselves by holding up to ridicule the solemn declarations of the
Scriptures concerning Christ and the plan of salvation, and the retribution to be
visited upon the rejecters of the truth. ...They manifest as much assurance as
if, indeed, they had made a covenant with death and an agreement with hell —
as if they had erected an impassable, impenetrable barrier between themselves
and the vengeance of God. Nothing can arouse their fears. So fully have they
yielded to the tempter, so closely are they united with him, and so thoroughly
imbued with his spirit, that they have no power and no inclination to break away
from his snare.
... “The people are fast being lulled to a fatal security, to be awakened only by
the outpouring of the wrath of God.
“Saith the Lord God: ‘Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to
the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters
shall overflow the hiding place. And your covenant with death shall be
disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing
scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.’ Isaiah
28:17,18.” —The Great Controversy, pp. 560-562.
“Spiritualism declares that there is no death, no sin, no judgment, no retribution;
that ‘men are unfallen demigods;’ that desire is the highest law; and that man is
accountable only to himself.” —Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 688.
Satan says, “Ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Genesis 3:5.
Spiritualism teaches “that man is the creature of progression; that it is his
destiny from his birth to progress, even to eternity, toward the Godhead.” And
again: “Each mind will judge itself and not another.” “The judgment will be right,
because it is the judgment of self. . . . The throne is within you.” Said a
spiritualistic teacher, as the “spiritual consciousness” awoke within him: “My
fellow men, all were unfallen demigods.” And another declares: “Any just and
perfect being is Christ.” —The Great Controversy, p. 554.
In effect, spiritualists have so little awareness of moral accountability or a belief in
the true God that, virtually, the spiritualists’ belief is that you may “Live as you please
for heaven is your home.” “You set the standard.” “Reality is only what you perceive it
to be,” which they often express as, “Do your own thing,” “there is no right or wrong
except for what you think is right or wrong.”
That was the nineteenth century view of Spiritualism. It is still taught today. I would
now like to enlighten you on the most prominent New Age revelation on the meaning
of the atonement.
The story begins with a Columbia University psychologist and atheist, Dr. Helen
Schucman, hearing a voice in her mind. "This is a course in miracles. Please take
notes." See The Voice (Helen Schucman talks about "The Voice" that conveyed A
Course in Miracles to her). The channeled spirit claimed to be Jesus and dictated
about 1,500 pages to Dr. Schucman. Those pages became the New Age book, A
Course in Miracles. You will see that the revelation that Dr. Schucman received on
the atonement is remarkably similar in sentiment to what A. Graham Maxwell
teaches about the purpose of Christ's death. In what follows, I present lengthy
excerpts that summarize their messages. I also share a startling quote from an
article that Mike Clute published three times in God’s Last Call, a tabloid style
newspaper read by, and specially targeted for, Seventh-day Adventists. Mike Clute, a
rival to Graham Maxwell, also received his very Maxwellian theory from a voice in his
mind. See Mike Clute, Would Jesus Kill A Little Sparrow?
Warning. This is a look at some cutting edge spiritualistic teachings. (Please don’t
cry too excessively if I expose some frightening ideas warmly embraced by many
Seventh-day Adventists.)
Please note the following ideas as you read.
“And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness
unto all nations; and then shall the end come.” Matthew 24:14.
1. The final judgment will not come until it is no longer associated with fear.
2. The crucifixion was not a form of punishment.
3. The crucifixion is nothing more than an extreme example.
4. The crucifixion was a useless journey.
5. The crucifixion represents release from fear to anyone who understands it.
6. Those who fear God speak of the ‘wrath of God’ as His retaliatory weapon.
7. Punishment and condemnation do not come from God.
8. No one is punished for sins, and the Sons of God are not sinners.
9. Everyone is holy.
10. Judas was righteous—as much a part of the Sonship as is Jesus.
11. The New Testament gospel is really only the message of love.
12. The message of the crucifixion is perfectly clear: ‘Teach only love, for that
is what you are.’
13. If you interpret the crucifixion in any other way, you are using it as a
weapon for assault.
14. The Apostles often misunderstood Jesus and were imperfect.
15. The devil is God and God is the devil.
Here it comes. The following paragraphs have been chosen for their clarity and
shocking similarity to the aberrant theology of many Seventh-day Adventists. In
these citations, the editor sees a unique combination of beliefs — that of an unholy
trinity: the theology of Laodiceans, Maxaliens, and Satanists.
“The Message Of The Crucifixion”
“For learning purposes, let us consider the crucifixion again. I did not dwell on it
before because of the fearful connotations you may associate with it. The only
emphasis laid upon it so far has been that it was not a form of punishment.
Nothing, however, can be explained in negative terms only. There is a positive
interpretation of the crucifixion that is wholly devoid of fear, and therefore
wholly benign in what it teaches, if it is properly understood.
“The crucifixion is nothing more than an extreme example. Its value, like the
value of any teaching device, lies solely in the kind of learning it facilitates. It
can be, and has been, misunderstood. This is only because the fearful are apt to
perceive fearfully. I have already told you that you can always call on me to
share my decision, and thus make it stronger. I have also told you that the
crucifixion was the last useless journey the Sonship need take, and that it
represents release from fear to anyone who understands it.” — A Course In
Miracles, Vol. 1, pp. 84-85.
“The message of the crucifixion is perfectly clear:
‘Teach only love, for that is what you are.’”
“If you interpret the crucifixion in any other way, you are using it as a weapon
for assault rather than as the call for peace for which it was intended. The
Apostles often misunderstood it, and for the same reason that anyone
misunderstands it. Their own imperfect love made them vulnerable to
projection, and out of their own fear they spoke of the ‘wrath of God’ as His
retaliatory weapon. Nor could they speak of the crucifixion entirely without
anger, because their sense of guilt had made them angry.
“These are some of the examples of upside-down thinking in the New
Testament, although its gospel is really only the message of love. If the
Apostles had not felt guilty, they never could have quoted me as saying, ‘I come
not to bring peace but a sword.’ This is clearly the opposite of everything I
taught. Nor could they have described my reaction to Judas as they did, if they
had really understood me. I could not have said, ‘Betrayest thou the Son of Man
with a kiss?’ unless I believed in betrayal. The whole message of the crucifixion
was simply that I did not. The ‘punishment’ I was said to have called forth upon
Judas was a similar mistake. Judas was my brother and a Son of God, as much
a part of the Sonship as myself. Was it likely that I would condemn him when I
was ready to demonstrate that condemnation is impossible?
“As you read the teachings of the Apostles, remember that I told them myself
that there was much they would understand later, because they were not wholly
ready to follow me at the time. I do not want you to allow any fear to enter into
the thought system toward which I am guiding you. I do not call for martyrs but
for teachers. No one is punished for sins, and the Sons of God are not sinners.
Any concept of punishment involves the projection of blame, and reinforces the
idea that blame is justified. The result is a lesson in blame, for all behavior
teaches the beliefs that motivate it.” —A Course In Miracles, Vol. 1, pp. 87-88.
“Is Each One To Be Judged In The End?”
“Indeed, yes! No one can escape God’s final judgment. Who could flee forever
from the truth? But the final judgment will not come until it is no longer
associated with fear. One day each one will welcome it, and on that very day it
will be given him. He will hear his sinlessness proclaimed around and around
the world, setting it free as God’s final judgment on him is received. This is the
judgment in which salvation lies. This is the judgment that will set him free.
This is the judgment in which all things are freed with him. Time pauses as
eternity comes near, and silence lies across the world that everyone may hear
this judgment of the Son of God:
‘Holy are you, eternal, free
and whole,
At peace forever in the
Heart of God.
Where is the world, and
where is sorrow now?’ ”
—A Course In Miracles, Vol.
3, p. 37.
How Graham Maxwell's Rival Interprets Genesis 2 and 3
“We have been told that blessings and cursings cannot proceed from the same
mouth. James 3:8-12. The ‘Lord God’ in Genesis 2 is obviously a grudge-
holding, fault-finding personality who obviously thinks it is not enough to curse
man and woman for their ‘sin’ but every created being as well. Neither does He
bless anyone or give any Sabbath rest from their constant labors. He is a real
slave driver.
“There seems to have been no attempt to comfort, encourage or reconcile the
deflated pair in chapter 3. There was no mention of the great forgiveness of
God, which is His middle name, that leads all toward total and complete
restoration. Rather, their errors are held up and pointed out over and over again.
Curses are pronounced upon them with no mercy and they are banished from
their lovely garden home at a time when kind words and actions would have
been most effective in drawing them closer to the heart of God. These
punishments were designed to serve as an ever-present reminder of guilt and
could not serve any other purpose but to impose upon them shame and further
alienation from God. It would seem this is the real motive of this supposed
‘Lord god.’
“Genesis 3 seems to show the serpent trying to break a web spun by an
impostor. It was Eve that listened to the voice of the serpent, previously the
most glorious animal created. Eve ate of the fruit, felt no condemnation and
joyously spread the ‘gospel’ to her husband. ...
“If Eve listened to the true God in the tree reminding her that everything He
created was good, would not she provoke the ire of the ‘Lord God’ in chapter
2?” —Mike Clute, God’s Last Call, May-Aug. 1995.
There Is No Need To Fear
According to both the New Age interpretation of the crucifixion and A. Graham
Maxwell—Adventism’s most beloved teacher of spiritualism—the crucifixion
represents release from fear to anyone who understands it.
The following quotes are stunning excerpts from a taped Graham Maxwell
evangelistic series at Andrews University (Week of Prayer, October 1987) and were
transcribed by the Biblical Research Institute, General Conference of Seventh-day
Adventists.
Why Did Jesus Have to Die?
“I would like to talk to you tonight about what Jesus did on the cross has to do
with our being His servants or His friends. It is the essence of the meaning of
all 66 books, and I would like to summarize it in less than half an hour.”
“You remember that when Jesus answered questions, He often went back to
the beginning, which always takes a little time. But you remember when they
brought up the question of divorce, He said, Well, if you have the time, let Me go
back to the beginning. In the beginning it was not so, and so on. And with this
most serious of all questions, and the costly answer, that makes it possible for
the universe, the whole vast universe, to be secure for eternity, we need to go
back to the beginning always. In the beginning God spoke those terrible words,
‘In the day you eat thereof, you will die.’ Now, if Satan is right, if God has lied to
us, that is the end of trust. But if God really meant it when He said, ‘You will die,’
how will we die? Will He kill us? In the day you eat thereof, I will kill you. Is that
the way our Father runs His family? Obey Me, or I will kill you.”
“I thought God wanted love and friendship. Is it love Me, or I will kill you?”
“If the soul is mortal, how long will the mortal soul live in the fierce final fires?
You die quickly in fire. How is it that some will live longer in the fire, and you
know the verses—Luke 12:47,48. Some have more stripes than others. Do you
know what this means? If God is the executioner, He will have to perform a
miracle to keep you from dying prematurely from shock or suffocation in the
flames, and the message is, Love Me, accept Me, or I will torture you in the
flames. And you will never get a friend that way. We will all turn into fearful,
trembling servants. And He doesn’t want that. Do you know what torture is? In
any dictionary? The worst kind of torture is inflicting exquisite pain before
execution. Do you think our God will do that? I have read in books that even is
the loving thing to do.”
“Be my friend, or I will torture you to death, but I won’t torture you one minute
longer than you deserve. Oh, I love that.”
“So, I stand at the foot of the cross, and I say, Jesus, hanging there on the
cross, what did You mean when You said, Love and obey Me or you will die?
And Jesus could reply, I am showing you right now. What was He showing
them? As you read on through the 66 books, there are so many references to
God’s wrath and His anger, some day to be poured out without mixture on the
rejecters of His love, especially in the third angel’s message. What is this wrath?
Is it love and obey me, or in the fury of my wrath I will destroy you?”
“I remember more than forty years ago I determined I had to work that out. I
searched all through the Bible for the meaning, and most helpful was the book
of Romans. In Romans 1:24, 26, 28, God’s wrath is clearly described as His
turning away in loving disappointment from those who do not want Him
anyway, thus leaving them and giving them up and handing them over to reap
the awful consequences.”
“And that wasn’t new with Paul. It’s all through Hosea, chapter 11. God says, My
people are bent on leaving Me. I’ll have to let them go. But how can I give you
up? How can I let you go? Many other places like that.”
“Now, was God’s wrath poured out on His Son? Well, let me ask you, Did He give
Him up? Did He let Him go? Romans 4:25, I am sorry some versions say He was
put to death for our transgressions. There is not a word in the Greek about
being put to death. It is exactly the same word as in Romans 1:24, 26, 28. He
was given up. He was handed over for our transgressions. Yes, the wrath of
God was poured out on His Son, as it will be poured out on unsavable sinners at
the end.”
“What was Jesus' cry on the cross? Why are you torturing Me to death? No, Why
have you given Me up?”
“If you want to know how the sinner will die, go to the cross, watch Jesus die,
and hear His sad cry, Why have you given Me up? Why have you let Me go? It
would be better to come even earlier to Gethsemane, where Jesus began to
experience the sinner’s separation from the Father. His unity with the Father
breaking up. And Jesus fell dying to the ground. Did the Father kill His Son? He
didn’t even touch Him. And the angels looking on got the costly answer to their
questions. Does sin result in death? Indeed it does. But is it the result of God
torturing us to death? He never touched His Son.”
“Now, that makes sense to me. God doesn’t say, Love Me, or I will kill you. He
says what we even say to each other. Love Me, or what else can I do but let you
go. But when God says, I will have to let you go, we will die. But God says, I
won’t let you go easily. I’ll try everything first. I’ll thunder on Sinai to get your
attention. I’ll send she-bears to inspire a little reverence, because if you don’t
respect Me, you won’t listen, and I can’t help you. I’ll even come Myself and
show you now terrible is the consequence of sin, and if that doesn’t win you,
what else can I do but sadly give you up, and we mortals cannot live apart from
God. Left to our rebellious selves, we will die.”
“The angels watched Gethsemane. But the three disciples chosen to witness
that costly event slept through the whole meeting. So the angel strengthened
Jesus to go out to Calvary and go through it all over again. Besides, there was
another question to be answered. Why, dear God, is it so important that we
understand all of this? You are the sovereign Creator. You have the right to
govern your universe any way you wish. No one would dare question your right
to give orders and expect submission to your every command. Nor would
anyone dare to question your right to destroy those who are disobedient. And
that is just the point. God has replied, I don’t want you just to be My servants. I
want you to be My friends. I could easily have destroyed Satan when he
rebelled, but then you would have served Me from fear—not friendship. Even if I
had simply let him go, he would have died, just as Jesus has demonstrated. But
the angels, never having seen death, would have assumed that the Lifegiver had
killed him, and they would have served Him from fear, just the same.”
“And so I hear God saying, Oh, My children throughout the universe, I want you
to understand that the obedience that springs from fear can produce the
character of a rebel. Even as you fearfully obey Me, you will be turning against
Me. Now, please go out to Calvary and see that demonstrated. And this is the
one thing that is almost always left out of the explanation of why Jesus has had
to die. And why it is a terrible mistake, as you may hear sometimes, to call this
explanation the moral influence theory. This is an awesome explanation.” —A.
Graham Maxwell.”
Prayer and Praise Summary Statement For the Purpose of the Cross
“Our Heavenly Father is unwilling to lose one of His children. He wants us to
realize the terrible consequence of sin and take sin very seriously. And He
wants us to see the falsity of Satan’s lies and accusations. Yes, we will die. But
He has not said, Love Me, or I will kill you. It’s love Me, or I will let you go, and
you will die. But it is not torture and execution at the hands of our gracious
Father. For God does not want us to serve Him from fear. Or we will become
His enemies.”
“I can hear God saying, I want more than anything else freedom in My family. I
want peace and joy and love and freedom from fear. Children, I want you all to
be My friends. And to tell this and to demonstrate all this costs everything.
Truly, only our best friend would tell us. And Jesus went up to heaven, and He
went in before the angels, and He asked them, did you get the message? And
so after Jesus had heard them tell Him that they got the message, they got the
meaning, He came back to this planet to see if the brethren had got it. And He
couldn’t find them. They were all in deep depression. Well, they hadn’t even
gone to the meetings to get the answers. The three chosen ones who went to
Gethsemane slept through the whole evening, and only one went to the cross.
And he is the one who later on shows how clearly he understood it.”
“You see, they were dears. And the Lord was going to use them to build our
church, and I am glad He uses such people, because that means that He can
use you and me, but they still were just servants, you see. They still didn’t really
understand. So tonight, could you say to Jesus tonight, we get the message.
We are your friends. Should we pray.”
“Our loving Father in heaven, hopefully, all of us here can join with the loyal
angels in saying that we do get the message. What a price Thou hast paid to
make it clear that Thou art our friend, and just want us to be friends. What an
exalted position that seems to be. But how Thou hast humbled Thyself to come
down and be like a human being among us, to make it clear Thou doest not
want us to be afraid. And so we thank Thee for making this evidence so clear,
and we thank Thee most of all for what it cost. We get the message. We want
to be your friends. In Jesus name. Amen.” —A. Graham Maxwell.
Maxwell’s Church-Sanctioned Spiritualistic Philosophy Replaces
Repentance
“But part of the freedom that comes with friendship, the friendship that is
offered in John 15:15, is freedom from fear, and most of all, freedom from the
fear of God. And the Bible recognizes that one of people’s greatest fears is the
fear of dying. And the devil has made the most of it. Even the atheist knows,
and I’ve talked to some. You know, around a medical center you see a lot of
people who realize that if there is a god out there, they are about to meet him.
And even the atheist knows, though he may have denied all his life that there is
a God, that if there is one, he is about to come face to face with him. And he
wonders what that powerful something or person will be like. It is very
interesting to help such people die unafraid. Or would you think an atheist ought
to die scared stiff? He deserves to. You know, even God’s enemies have no
need to be afraid of Him.” —A. Graham Maxwell.
Are You Now Ready to Face God Without Fear?
“And last night we discussed one of the freedoms that comes with friendship,
the freedom from being afraid of an unfriendly God. And hence, as Hebrews 2
says, losing one of the fears of dying. Because we know that if we should die,
we would awaken the very next moment of consciousness, face to face with a
very friendly God. Even if we are going to be lost.” —A. Graham Maxwell.
Am I the only Seventh-day Adventist who is alarmed by this?
Beware the pan-Gnostic Adventist Spiritualists
Consider the word pantheist. It's constructed from the Greek πάν (pán) "all" and θεός
(Theós) "god". A pantheist then — of which pantheism is a variation — is someone
who believes that everything is God.
Pantheism, according to dictionary.com, means
1. the doctrine that God is the transcendent reality of which the material
universe and human beings are only manifestations: it involves a denial of
God's personality and expresses a tendency to identify God and nature.
2. any religious belief or philosophical doctrine that identifies God with the
universe.
I add a third meaning as a qualification to the first point:
3. The exaltation of the power and justice of natural consequences above
God qualifies as pantheism.
Quite literally then, pan-Gnostic would mean, all-Gnostic. Consider this illustration.
John Harvey Kellogg and his associates were called pan-theists because it was their
most distinguishing characteristic. They commingled God and nature. They were
absolutely thrilled by God being in their bath water, in the air they breathed and in the
bread they ate. See Adventism's Past Pantheism.
Similarly, a pan-Gnostic would be someone who believes that everything is
Gnosticism. Have you ever met someone that is genuinely fixated or hypnotized by a
single idea? There are Seventh-day Adventists that think that the greatest doctrine
ever taught to mortals is Gnosticism. They are consumed by it. They are marked by
their obsession.
Here is the primary concept behind Gnosticism:
"A rejection of all legal categories pertaining to God, leaving sin as
ignorance and salvation as a healing of the mind through accurate
information about God and His purposes, was the core teaching of the
Gnostic movement in the second to third centuries, and is the basis for
most Eastern religions, such as Hinduism and Buddhism." —Richard
Fredericks, Ministry, March 1992, pp. 6-10: The Moral Influence Theory—Its
Attraction and Inadequacy: The distorted attraction of one popular theory
of the atonement.
"The name ‘Gnosticism’ is given to all those different theories of the
universe which professed to be Christian, but amalgamated elements of
Christian belief with Hellenistic ideas regarding an intermediate world of
superhuman beings between the Supreme One and men, and regarding the
human soul as a part of the Divine which had fallen into the dark and evil
world of Matter. Each Gnostic sect claimed to have a special ‘knowledge’
(gnosis) to communicate, by which the Soul could get deliverance from
matter and win its way back to the Upper World. Most of the Gnostics
represented the God of the Old Testament as an inferior Being, often a
Being hostile to the Supreme God, ruling in the lower world, from which
‘knowledge’ enabled the Soul to escape." — The Seventh-day Adventist
Bible Commentary, Vol. 9, article 785: ‘Gnosticism.’
"The basic premise common to the many varieties of Gnostic belief was
that since God is good and the material world is evil, he cannot have
created it" (David Christie-Murray, A History Of Heresy, p. 21). The basic
premise of Neo-Gnostic Adventism (and Maxwell) is that since God is
good and retribution is evil, then God has nothing to do with meting out
punishment in a final judgment.
"These systems were philosophical in that the problem which concerned
all Gnostics was the reconciliation of the existence of evil with God who is
good; religious because they offered salvation", salvation by gnosis. (Does
that sound familiar)?
Also see Pseudo Adventism’s Pantheism
Our Fundamental Beliefs | I Want To Be Disfellowshipped From The SDA Church | The Endtime
Message
Have a question or comment?
Follow it up in our Discussion Forum.
