Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR)
Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR)
One of humankind’s greatest challenges this century will be to ensure sustainable, just and
balanced development. The needs of current and future generations cannot be met unless
there is respect for natural systems and international standards protecting core social and
environmental values. In this context, it is increasingly recognized that the role of the
business sector is critical. As a part of society, it is in business’ interest to contribute to
addressing common problems. Strategically speaking, business can only flourish when the
communities and ecosystems in which they operate are healthy.
There is growing recognition of the significant effect the activities of the private business
sector have—on employees, customers, communities, the environment, competitors,
business partners, investors, shareholders, governments and others. It is also becoming
increasingly clear that firms can contribute to their own wealth and to overall societal
wealth by considering the effect they have on the world at large when making decisions.
Business opinion polls and corporate behavior both show increased levels of
understanding of the link between responsible business and good business. Also, investors
and financial markets are beginning to see that CSR activities that integrate broader
societal concerns into business strategy and performance are evidence of good
management. In addition to building trust with the community and giving firms an edge in
attracting good customers and employees, acting responsibly towards workers and others
in society can help build value for firms and their shareholders.
It must be recognized up front that CSR still creates a degree of confusion and
controversy. Is the promotion and implementation of socially and environmentally
preferable corporate conducts a function of business or government? Is the implementation
of CSR practices a cost or a value-enhancer? Is it just public relations? In part, the
problem stems from definitional issues, and a perception in some quarters that CSR is
more about philanthropy, rather than “doing business” and responding to shareholder
interests. The central thesis of this guide is that CSR is an integral part of the new business
model.
Businesses are an integral part of the communities in which they operate. Good executives
know that their long-term success is based on continued good relations with a wide range
of individuals, groups and institutions. Smart firms know that business can’t succeed in
societies that are failing—whether this is due to social or environmental challenges, or
governance problems. Moreover, the general public has high expectations of the private
sector in terms of responsible behavior. Consumers expect goods and services to reflect
socially and environmentally responsible business behavior at competitive prices.
Shareholders also are searching for enhanced financial performance that integrates social
and environmental considerations, both in terms of risk and opportunities.
Governments, too, are becoming aware of the national competitive advantages to be won
from a responsible business sector. At the same time, leading industry associations, such
as the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, have also suggested that
countries as well as companies might gain a competitive advantage from corporate social
responsibility. In much of the developing world, governments and business understand
that their respective competitive positions, and access to capital, increasingly depend on
being seen to respect the highest global standards.
Even companies which may have a good reputation can risk losing their hard-earned name
when they fail to put systematic approaches in place to ensure continued positive
performance. The effect of a tarnished reputation often extends far beyond that one firm:
entire sectors and, indeed, nations can suffer. Hardly a month goes by without some
example of a major corporation suffering a reduced market position as a result of
questionable behavior, with many others subsequently finding themselves to be a part of
the collateral damage. These firms frequently expend considerable time and money
attempting to regain their reputation, with mixed results.
As per working definition, ISO 26000 Working Group on Social Responsibility, Sydney,
February 2007, “Social responsibility (is the) responsibility of an organization for the
impacts of its decisions and activities on society and the environment through transparent
and ethical behavior that is consistent with sustainable development and the welfare of
society; takes into account the expectations of stakeholders; is in compliance with
applicable law and consistent with international norms of behavior; and is integrated
throughout the organization.”
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is also known by a number of other names. These
include corporate responsibility, corporate accountability, corporate ethics, corporate
citizenship or stewardship, responsible entrepreneurship, and “triple bottom line,” to name
just a few. As CSR issues become increasingly integrated into modern business practices,
there is a trend towards referring to it as “responsible competitiveness” or “corporate
sustainability.” A key point to note is that CSR is an evolving concept that currently does
not have a universally accepted definition. Generally, CSR is understood to be the way
firms integrate social, environmental and economic concerns into their values, culture,
decision making, strategy and operations in a transparent and accountable manner and
thereby establish better practices within the firm, create wealth and improve society. As
issues of sustainable development become more important, the question of how the
business sector addresses them is also becoming an element of CSR. The World Business
Council for Sustainable Development has described CSR as the business contribution to
sustainable economic development. Building on a base of compliance with legislation and
regulations, CSR typically includes “beyond law” commitments and activities pertaining
to:
- corporate governance and ethics;
- health and safety;
- environmental stewardship;
- human rights (including core labour rights);
- sustainable development;
- conditions of work (including safety and health, hours of work, wages);
- industrial relations;
- community involvement, development and investment;
- involvement of and respect for diverse cultures and disadvantaged peoples;
- corporate philanthropy and employee volunteering;
- customer satisfaction and adherence to principles of fair competition;
- anti-bribery and anti-corruption measures;
- accountability, transparency and performance reporting; and
- supplier relations, for both domestic and international supply chains.
These elements of CSR are frequently interconnected and interdependent, and apply to
firms wherever they operate in the world. It is also important to bear in mind that there are
two separate drivers for CSR. One relates to public policy. Because the impacts of the
business sector are so large, and with a potential to be either positive or negative, it is
natural that governments and wider society take a close interest in what business does.
This means that the expectations on businesses are rising; governments will be looking for
ways to increase the positive contribution of business. The second driver is the business
driver. Here, CSR considerations can be seen as both costs (e.g., of introducing new
approaches) or benefits (e.g., of improving brand value, or introducing products that meet
sustainability demands). The remainder of this guide addresses the second of these drivers.
Since businesses play a pivotal role both in job and wealth creation in society and in the
efficient use of natural capital, CSR is a central management concern. It positions
companies to both proactively manage risks and take advantage of opportunities,
especially with respect to their corporate reputation and the broad engagement of
stakeholders. The latter can include shareholders, employees, customers, communities,
suppliers, governments, non-governmental organizations, international organizations and
others affected by a company’s activities (see Part 3, which is exclusively devoted to
stakeholder engagement).
Above all, CSR is about sensitivity to context—both societal and environmental—and
related performance. It is about moving beyond declared intentions to effective and
observable actions and measurable societal impacts. Performance reporting is all part of
transparent, accountable—and, hence, credible—corporate behavior. There is considerable
potential for problems if stakeholders perceive that a firm is engaging in a public relations
exercise and cannot demonstrate concrete actions that lead to real social and
environmental benefits.
In the flat world, with lengthy global supply chains, the balance of power between global
companies and the individual communities in which they operate is tilting more and more
in favor of the companies…. As such these companies are going to command more power,
not only to create value but also to transmit values, than any other institution on the planet.
Many factors and influences have led to increasing attention being devoted to the role of
companies and CSR. These include:
Sustainable development: United Nations’ (UN) studies and many others have
underlined the fact that humankind is using natural resources at a faster rate than
they are being replaced. If this continues, future generations will not have the
resources they need for their development. In this sense, much of current
development is unsustainable—it can’t be continued for both practical and moral
reasons. Related issues include the need for greater attention to poverty alleviation
and respect for human rights. CSR is an entry point for understanding sustainable
development issues and responding to them in a firm’s business strategy.
Globalization: With its attendant focus on cross-border trade, multinational
enterprises and global supply chains—economic globalization is increasingly
raising CSR concerns related to human resource management practices,
environmental protection, and health and safety, among other things. CSR can play
a vital role in detecting how business impacts labor conditions, local communities
and economies, and what steps can be taken to ensure business helps to maintain
and build the public good. This can be especially important for export-oriented
firms in emerging economies.
Key potential benefits for firms implementing CSR: Key potential benefits for firms
implementing CSR include:
into improved stakeholder relations. This, in turn, may evolve into more robust and
enduring public, private and civil society alliances (all of which relate closely to
CSR reputation, discussed above). CSR can help build “social capital.”
Access to capital. Financial institutions are increasingly incorporating social and
environmental criteria into their assessment of projects. When making decisions
about where to place their money, investors are looking for indicators of effective
CSR management. A business plan incorporating a good CSR approach is often
seen as a proxy for good management.
Improved relations with regulators. In a number of jurisdictions, governments
have expedited approval processes for firms that have undertaken social and
environmental activities beyond those required by regulation. In some countries,
governments use (or are considering using) CSR indicators in deciding on
procurement or export assistance contracts. This is being done because
governments recognize that without an increase in business sector engagement,
government sustainability goals cannot be reached (see box below).
A catalyst for responsible consumption. Changing unsustainable patterns of
consumption is widely seen as an important driver to achieving sustainable
development. Companies have a key role to play in facilitating sustainable
consumption patterns and lifestyles through the goods and services they provide
and the way they provide them. “Responsible consumerism” is not exclusively
about changing consumer preferences. It is also about what goods are supplied in
the marketplace, their relationship to consumer rights and sustainability issues, and
how regulatory authorities mediate the relationship between producers and
consumers.
Based on a two-year study, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development has
drawn several conclusions about the benefits of CSR to companies” • A coherent CSR
strategy, based on integrity, sound values and a long-term approach, offers clear business
benefits to companies and helps a firm make a positive contribution to society;
- A CSR strategy provides businesses with the opportunity to show their human
face;
- Such a strategy requires engagement in open dialogue and constructive
partnerships with governments at various levels, intergovernmental
organizations, non-governmental organizations, other elements of civil society
and, in particular, local communities;
- When implementing a CSR strategy, companies should recognize and respect
local and cultural differences, while maintaining high and consistent global
standards and policies; and
- Being responsive to local differences means taking specific initiatives.
There is a close relationship between CSR and the law. The main instrument governments
use to address a firm’s social, environmental and economic impacts is the law. Many
countries have a wide range of laws, whether at the national, state or local levels of
government, relating to consumers, workers, health and safety, human rights and
environmental protection, bribery and corruption, corporate governance and taxation. A
firm’s CSR approach should begin by ensuring full compliance with those laws already in
place. No matter how good a CSR policy may be, failure to observe the law will
undermine other good efforts. Looking ahead, the CSR activities of firms can be seen as a
proactive method of addressing potentially problematic conduct before it attracts legal
attention.
A key feature of the emerging CSR debate is the difference between a “compliance”
mentality (i.e., only doing those things that are required) and a “value driven” mentality
(i.e., using a CSR approach to innovate and seek new markets). Some commentators argue
that a compliance-based approach does not help business, because it tends not to drive
innovation and the “out of the box” thinking they see as necessary in the rapidly changing
business world. That said, a number of specific legal aspects are worth mentioning.
Performance reporting and the law. In many jurisdictions there are laws in place
requiring firms in particular sectors to publicly disclose certain of their practices
and activities. The U.K. Companies Act 2006, for example, requires publicly-listed
companies to report on a number of specific issues where they are necessary to
understanding the company’s business. These include environmental matters
(including the impact of the company’s business on the environment), the
company’s employees, social and community issues, and risks through the
company supply chains. Similar provisions also exist in France and across the EU.
Corporate governance and disclosure. Social and environmental issues are
increasingly being seen as integral components of the corporate governance
agenda.20 In many countries firms issuing securities are required to publicly
disclose their corporate governance practices and comply with local guidelines on
the subject. A 2005 report by the international law firm Fresh-fields, Bruckhaus
and Deringer21 concluded that under the current legal systems of many countries,
directors might be in breach of their fiduciary duties if they did not take into
account environmental, social and governance issues.
Bribery. CSR also stresses that firms should adopt responsible practices wherever
they operate. National laws making it illegal to bribe foreign officials to obtain or
retain business on the subject are often based on the 1997 OECD Convention on
Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business
Transactions,22 and the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption.
Requirements under different jurisdictions. It is important to be aware of the
varying legal requirements of different countries. In the U.K., for example,
legislation requires pension fund trustees to publish a comment in their investment
statements on the extent to which their investment policies address social, ethical
and environmental issues. As noted above, in European countries laws require
companies to report on their social and environmental performance. In the U.S., a
number of firms have been sued under the Alien Tort Claims Act (e.g., Doe v.
Unocal), which raises the possibility that corporate liability could be established
through transnational civil litigation. The U.S. has also significantly revised its
corporate governance legislation in recent years, in particular, passing the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 which establishes stricter standards for all U.S. public
company boards, management and public accounting firms. At the United Nations,
a Special Representative on Business and Human Rights to the Secretary-General
was appointed in July 2005. The Special Representative is expected to identify
standards of corporate responsibility and accountability, enhance understanding
and recognition of these standards, and issue recommendations on future United
Nations work regarding business and human rights issues. Mention should also be
made in this context of the many business codes of conduct that exist. These codes,
often developed by a specific industry sector, are usually voluntary and not legally-
binding. Nonetheless, they can be used in a legally-binding manner in a contractual
context (e.g., in a supply chain). Here, various legal questions may arise, including
in relation to whether national, regional or international standards take precedence.
This guide proposes an implementation framework comprising six key tasks (see chart
below). In recognition of the fact that firms are at different levels of sophistication and
development with respect to CSR, it is understood that firms may choose to forego a
particular aspect or task when it has already been undertaken.
[
The framework is intended to help boards of directors, CEOs, managers, employees and
others assess a firm’s effects on society and the challenges and opportunities associated
with taking these impacts into account in decision making and business activities. As
understood here, a firm’s CSR approach should be an integral part of its core business
objectives and strategy. Just as importantly, it is also part of a wider trend towards
exploring ways to ensure that the individual and collective activities of the business sector
advance progress towards internationally-agreed challenges, and create an environment
where business is itself sustainable.
In most regions of the world—in both the developed and developing world—the great
majority of businesses are classified as “small and medium sized enterprises” (SMEs).
Whether micro one-person businesses or firms with around 200 employees, SMEs are also
the largest employers. While individually their contributions and impacts on surrounding
communities and the environment may be small, collectively these impacts are large.
Because SMEs are many and tend to have a lower public profile than their larger
counterparts, on-governmental organizations (NGOs) may not target them for failing to
take their societal impacts into account. However, the support of the community around
small firms is usually more essential for their success than it is for large businesses. In
fact, larger firms in the CSR spotlight may seek out as business partners small local firms
with CSR approaches in place.
A Canadian Federation of Independent Business survey of its members found that doing
things right, even at a cost, is important for small businesses. For example, the survey
revealed that “SMEs [small and medium-sized enterprises] are strongly committed to
environmental protection, which is evident through their significant progress achieved
during the past decade.
The distinct challenges facing small business—such as being pressed for time, money and
resources—are well known. But while these challenges are great, smaller businesses are
also recognizing the value of embracing CSR.
The CSR implementation framework set out in this guide is built around the “plan, do,
check and improve” model, which is a sound approach for firms of any size. However,
many of the steps may be too elaborate for small businesses.
To address the needs of small business owners and their employees, tips for simplifying
the process are provided throughout in boxes marked with the magnifying glass icon. In
addition, a list of suggestions for CSR activities particularly suited to small businesses is
located on page XX. The suggestions may also be of interest to those in larger firms.
Reflecting the importance of SMEs, there are an increasing number of specially developed
toolkits for small business. These include:
- Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility for Small & Medium-
Sized Enterprises. This is a free, online, European Commission toolkit for
SMEs that includes a self-awareness test, case studies and other materials;
Historically, the business leaders, government and policy makers in Bangladesh placed
economic imperatives before social justice in order to accelerate the pace of economic
growth (Quazi, 1994). The community also supported this national priority and
overlookedthe negative consequences of business operations (such as environmental
pollution) for the sake of national prosperity. However, there has been increasing pressure
on national and multinational corporations in Bangladesh to consider the social
implications of their actions (Belal, 2001). For example, product safety has become so
devastating in Bangladesh that the government has launched a campaign to combat
businesses that are responsible for widespread adulteration of consumer goods. Numerous
businesses have been heavily fined for violating product safety regulations and the r
government has also brought hundreds of corrupt politicians to justice.
A review of the CSR practices reveals that a number of corporations are showing an
increased commitment to CSR beyond profit making and compliance with regulation. For
example, CARE Bangladesh, Katalyst (funded by DFID, SDC, SIDA and CIDA) and
Bangladesh Enterprise Institute (BEI) are working at the forefront of CSR programs in
Bangladesh. Katalyst has been developing programs for CSR and have prepared a
Corporate Social Audit (CSA) catering to small/medium enterprises. Similarly CARE had
initiated successful CSR programs with BATA where the company is using the extensive
network of CARE to promote its environmentally-friendly products door-to-door in rural
communities. While these initiatives are more discretionary in their nature, they have
resulted in the creation of jobs and value-added services to communities which BATA
and CARE are showcasing as CSR programs in action.
Table 1 provides a summary of CSR actions reflected by a sample of 17 prominent multi-
national corporations and large locally-based firms operating in Bangladesh. Information
on these firms was obtained from a review of annual reports, mainstream media and
company websites. These 17 companies were identified following a web search of
companies using such keywords as corporate social responsibility, corporate social
accountability, philanthropy, corporate giving and charity in the Bangladesh context. The
websites were also scanned for programs or events connected to the above set of words.
Aside from a few local corporations, the bulk of CSR programs were carried out by MNCs
or companies in which MNCs have a considerable equity position. Some banks and
consumer products companies have directly, or through their established foundations,
undertaken CSR programs (even though they may not have coined them as such). Several
pharmaceutical companies had social responsibility highlighted among their values
mentioned on their website. Upon further inquiry into their annual reports, they had shown
commitment by funding activities such as city beautification projects, employing
physically handicapped people, sponsoring medical camps, education scholarships,
providing medicines and support for disaster recovery programs.
Table 1:
Table 1 shows that firms implemented CSR for mostly ethical or discretion reasons. Of the
17 firms investigated, 10 had implemented CSR for discretionary reasons, nine for ethical
reasons, and one firm implemented for legal reasons. A search of websites for the 17
companies using such key words as corporate social responsibility, corporate social
accountability, philanthropy, and corporate giving revealed that only three firms (Concord
Real Estate, Partex Group and Monno Ceramic) reported no CSR related information—
suggesting a reliance on traditional economic imperatives. Interestingly, five of the 17
firms were observed to implement different types of CSR initiatives for different strategic
reasons—indicating that even though such firms could be ethically motivated, they were
still keen to exploit any economic benefits associated with their CSR activities. However,
overall, these findings show that corporations in Bangladesh are concerned with CSR, and
are implementing CSR initiatives to build social equity within their employees, the
community and relevant stakeholders—even if the motivation is altruistic.