TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PLAN
Resources
Prioritized Needs Time frame
TA Objectives Strategies/Activities Expected Results Person/s
of the Clients Materials Budget
Responsible
Communicate to Inform all a. Organize virtual LAC Teachers July 27-30, SH MDL-P Guides None
school stakeholders session with teachers understood MDL-P 2020
stakeholders for (parents, teachers, for the understanding of
the etc.) about the MDL-P.
understanding of school’s chosen b. Disseminate MDL-P Stakeholders July 27- SH MDL-P None
MDL-P LDM information and understood MDL-P August 1, Teachers Guides
guidelines to all 2020
stakeholders/
community in different
flat forms based on their
available resources.
Discuss the Explain the a. Disseminate Full understanding August 3-7, SH MDL-P None
process for processes of information on of MDL-P processes 2020 Teachers Guides
successful distribution and processes of distribution
implementation retrieval of MDL-P and retrieval of MDL-P
of MDL-P Explain raised through social media,
issues and infographics and
concerns regarding tarpaulins.
MDL-P b. Answer raised issues Full understanding August 3-7, SH MDL-P None
and concerns regarding of MDL-P processes 2020 Teachers Guides
MDL-P, and during
simulation.
Seek Identify and a. Present the needed Understanding on August 3-7, SH School’s None
stakeholders’ engage and available resources needed resources 2020 Teachers Financial Plan for
assistance and stakeholders for for the MDL-P learning for the Reproduction of
engagement for the effective delivery. implementation of Modules
MDL-P implementation of MDL-P
implementation MDL-P b. Write communication Raised fund and August – SH School’s None
resources letter to possible donor- other materials October, Financial Plan
stakeholders. needed for MDL-P 2020 and Adjustment
for Reproduction
of Modules
Introduce Identify a. Present different flat List of different flat August 3-7, SH None None
different flat appropriate flat forms for planned forms 2020
forms of forms of meetings/ meetings
communication in communications b. Coach teachers the Teachers plan of August 3-7, SH None None
the “new normal” with teachers, use of different flat meetings and 2020 Teachers
delivery of parents, and other forms for their planned identified
education stakeholders based meetings appropriate flat
on their available forms
resources
Organize learners Establish the a. Drafting of Modular Accomplished Class July 27 to SH Class program None
and manage mechanism of Class Program in Program August 2, Teachers
learning in organizing learners distribution and 2020
Modular Distance and managing retrieval of modules
Learning learning
b. Conduct of Simulation Answered Printed August 10-15, SH Printed Materials P10,000.00
Activities Materials/ 2020 Teachers to be distributed
Successful Parents and
Documentation of Barangay Documentation
the Activities Officials/ Equipment
School
Stakeholders
This Agreement is made by and between the following parties:
Party A: Division /School Head of: CINENSE INTEGRATED SCHOOL 09361146535
(Name of School/SDO/Teacher) (Contact No.)
Party B: RO/DO Technical Assistance / _______________________________ _________________
Team: (Name) (Position)
Submitted to: ____________________________ __________________
(Name) (Position)
MONITORING, EVALUATION & LEARNING PLAN
The following table provides a way to map the work on monitoring and evaluating the Technical Assistance / Coaching provided
MONITORING, EVALUATION & LEARNING PLAN FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / COACHING
USE OF M&E RESULTS
DATA COLLECTION TIMING OF DATA ANALYSIS WHO WILL COLLECT (THIS IS THE “LEARNING
INDICATOR
METHOD COLLECTION METHOD & ANALYZE DATA ASPECT OF THE MEL
M&E INQUIRY ON TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK)
ASSISTANCE / COACHING Who are the users of the
What indicators will be How will you From whom will the M&E Report?
How will you gather When will you gather
gathered to respond to the process the data data come from and On what aspect will they
the indicator? the indicator?
M&E Inquiry gathered? who will collect ? use it (e.g. decision to
adjust the TA Plan)?
PROGRESS on LEARNING
due to TA/C Teacher’s Performance Fill out and Quarterly Analyze the Teachers School Head/
in Classroom Collect the result of the School Head Teachers
1. Appropriateness and
Observation necessary forms data Basis for decision
efficiency of the TA with correct and gathered making in adjusting
approach accurate data
Self – Assessment Technical
TA/C objectives
Tool Conduct Assistance Plan
achieved? Post
TA approach/strategy Conference
fits the “learning Teachers M & E to teachers
style of client”? Report
TA / C timing met the
need of the client?
Barriers encountered
and addressed
2. Learning acquired due
to TA/C Test Item Analysis By grade Level After classroom Analyze Teachers School Heads
Extent of learning Result By subject area observation Rating Sheet School Heads
acquired based on TA Classroom Every quarter of Teachers
Plan objectives? Observation Tool (COT)
Learning matched the Post
needs of client? Conference
Analyze
Test Result
MONITORING, EVALUATION & LEARNING PLAN FOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE / COACHING
USE OF M&E RESULTS
DATA COLLECTION TIMING OF DATA ANALYSIS WHO WILL COLLECT (THIS IS THE “LEARNING
INDICATOR
METHOD COLLECTION METHOD & ANALYZE DATA ASPECT OF THE MEL
M&E INQUIRY ON TECHNICAL FRAMEWORK)
ASSISTANCE / COACHING Who are the users of the
What indicators will be How will you From whom will the M&E Report?
How will you gather When will you gather
gathered to respond to the process the data data come from and On what aspect will they
the indicator? the indicator?
M&E Inquiry gathered? who will collect ? use it (e.g. decision to
adjust the TA Plan)?
3. INTERMEDIATE
RESULTS IN TERMS
OF BEHAVIOR
CHANGE DUE TO
TA/C Self – Assessment Tool Providing tools Annually Analyze data Teachers School Head/ (basis for
Were the learnings accomplish by the provided by School Head adjustment of the TA
being applied in the Performance Monitoring teachers Quarterly/as the teachers plan)
workplace? and Coaching Form Conducting/ needed from the data Teachers (improve
Scheduling presented in performance level)
Extent learnings were
individual the indicator
applied in the conference with
workplace? the teacher base on
TA approaches that the ISP
effect positive
learning and
behaviour change of
client?
