0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views2 pages

Rubric For Thesis Defense PDF

This rubric evaluates thesis defenses based on written and oral components. For the written thesis, it assesses overall quality, contribution to the field, and writing quality. For the oral defense, it evaluates the presentation quality, breadth of knowledge, and response to questions. Candidates can exceed, meet, or not meet expectations for each attribute, and scores determine an overall percentage rating.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views2 pages

Rubric For Thesis Defense PDF

This rubric evaluates thesis defenses based on written and oral components. For the written thesis, it assesses overall quality, contribution to the field, and writing quality. For the oral defense, it evaluates the presentation quality, breadth of knowledge, and response to questions. Candidates can exceed, meet, or not meet expectations for each attribute, and scores determine an overall percentage rating.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

TITLE OF THESIS: _________________________________________________________________________________________

RUBRIC FOR THESIS DEFENSE

Attribute for Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Score
WRITTEN (1 – 5) (6 – 10) (11 -15)
Over-All Quality * Arguments are incorrect, incoherent, * Arguments are coherent and clear * Arguments are superior
of Research or flawed * Objectives are clear * Objectives are well-defined
* Objectives are poorly defined * Demonstrates average critical thinking * Exhibits mature, critical thinking skills
* Demonstrates rudimentary critical skills * Exhibits mastery of subject matter and
thinking skills * Reflects understanding of subject associated literature
* Does not reflect understanding of matter and associated literature * Demonstrates mastery of theoretical
subject matter and associated literature * Demonstrates understanding of concepts
* Demonstrates poor understanding of theoretical concepts * Demonstrates exceptional originality
theoretical concepts * Demonstrates originality * Displays exceptional creativity and
* Displays limited creativity and * Displays creativity and insight insight
insight
Contribution to * Limited evidence of discovery * Some evidence of discovery * Exceptional evidence of discovery
Discipline * Limited expansion upon previous * Builds upon previous research * Greatly extends previous research
research * Reasonable theoretical or applied * Exceptional theoretical or applied
* Limited theoretical or applied significance significance
significance * Reasonable publication impact * Exceptional publication impact
* Limited publication impact
Quality of * Writing is weak * Writing is adequate * Writing is publication quality
Writing * Numerous grammatical and spelling * Some grammatical and spelling errors * No grammatical and spelling errors
errors apparent apparent apparent
* Organization is poor * Organization is logical * Organization is excellent
* Documentation is poor * Documentation is adequate * Documentation is excellent
COMMENTS/ REMARKS: ___________________________________________________________________________________________
Attribute for Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Score
ORAL (1 – 5) (6 – 10) (11 -15)
Over-All Quality * Poorly organized * Clearly organized * Well organized
of Presentation * Poor presentation * Clear presentation * Professional presentation
* Poor communication skills * Good communication skills * Excellent communication skills
* Slides and manuscript difficult to * Slides and manuscript clear * Slides and manuscript outstanding
read
Over-all Breadth * Presentation unacceptable * Presentation acceptable * Presentation superior
of Knowledge * Presentation reveals critical * Presentation reveals some depth of * Presentation reveals exceptional depth
weaknesses in depth of knowledge in knowledge in subject matter of knowledge in subject matter
subject matter * Presentation reveals above average * Presentation reveals well-developed
* Presentation does not reflect well- critical thinking skills critical thinking skills
developed critical thinking skills * Presentation reveals the ability to draw * Presentation reveals the ability to
* Presentation is narrow in scope from knowledge in several disciplines interconnect and extend knowledge in
several disciplines
Quality of * Responses are incomplete or require * Responses are complete * Responses are eloquent
Response to prompting * Arguments are well-organized * Arguments are skillfully presented
Questions * Arguments are poorly presented * Respondent exhibits adequate * Respondent exhibits superior
* Respondent exhibits lack of knowledge in subject area knowledge in subject area
knowledge in subject area
COMMENTS/ REMARKS: ___________________________________________________________________________________________

COMPUTATION OF RUBRIC SCORE: Attribute for Written (Sub-Total) + Attribute for Oral (Sub-Total) = Grand Score (Maximum Points is 90)
To get the Percentage: Grand Score / 90 X 50 + 50 = % Rating

Percentage
Rated by: ___________________________________________ Rating: _____________
(Name and Signature of Panelist)

Date: ______________________________________________

You might also like