0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views16 pages

General Linear Model Analysis Results

The general linear model analyzed the effect of the within-subjects factor "factor1" on the dependent variables VAR00001, VAR00002, VAR00003, and VAR00004. Mauchly's test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been met. The results of the multivariate and univariate tests showed that there were no significant effects of "factor1" on any of the dependent variables. Descriptive statistics are also reported for each dependent variable.

Uploaded by

Agatha Olvianti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views16 pages

General Linear Model Analysis Results

The general linear model analyzed the effect of the within-subjects factor "factor1" on the dependent variables VAR00001, VAR00002, VAR00003, and VAR00004. Mauchly's test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been met. The results of the multivariate and univariate tests showed that there were no significant effects of "factor1" on any of the dependent variables. Descriptive statistics are also reported for each dependent variable.

Uploaded by

Agatha Olvianti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GLM VAR00001 VAR00002 VAR00003 VAR00004

/WSFACTOR=factor1 4 Polynomial
/MEASURE=nyeri
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/WSDESIGN=factor1.

General Linear Model

Notes
Output Created 07-OCT-2020 [Link]
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet3
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 15
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all
cases with valid data for all
variables in the model.
Syntax GLM VAR00001 VAR00002
VAR00003 VAR00004
/WSFACTOR=factor1 4
Polynomial
/MEASURE=nyeri
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/WSDESIGN=factor1.
Resources Processor Time [Link],02
Elapsed Time [Link],02
Within-Subjects
Factors
Measure: nyeri
Dependent
factor1 Variable
1 VAR00001
2 VAR00002
3 VAR00003
4 VAR00004

Multivariate Tests
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.
factor1 Pillai's Trace .087 .382 3.000 12.000 .768
Wilks' Lambda .913 .382 3.000 12.000 .768
Hotelling's Trace .095 .382 3.000 12.000 .768
Roy's Largest Root .095 .382 3.000 12.000 .768

Mauchly's Test of Sphericity


Measure: nyeri
Epsilon
Within Subjects Mauchly's Approx. Chi- Greenhouse
Effect W Square df Sig. -Geisser
factor1 .813 2.631 5 .757 .897

Tests of Within-Subjects Effects


Measure: nyeri
Type III Sum of
Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
factor1 Sphericity Assumed 370.983 3 123.661 .363 .780
Greenhouse-Geisser 370.983 2.692 137.812 .363 .759
Huynh-Feldt 370.983 3.000 123.661 .363 .780
Lower-bound 370.983 1.000 370.983 .363 .557
Error(factor1) Sphericity Assumed 14311.767 42 340.756
Greenhouse-Geisser 14311.767 37.687 379.751
Huynh-Feldt 14311.767 42.000 340.756
Lower-bound 14311.767 14.000 1022.269

Tests of Within-Subjects Contrasts


Measure: nyeri
Type III Sum of
Source factor1 Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
factor1 Linear 282.270 1 282.270 .721 .410
Quadratic 79.350 1 79.350 .374 .551
Cubic 9.363 1 9.363 .022 .883
Error(factor1) Linear 5483.180 14 391.656
Quadratic 2972.900 14 212.350
Cubic 5855.687 14 418.263

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


Measure: nyeri
Transformed Variable: Average
Type III Sum of
Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Intercept 198260.017 1 198260.017 691.105 .000
Error 4016.233 14 286.874

EXAMINE VARIABLES=VAR00001 VAR00002 VAR00003 VAR00004


/PLOT BOXPLOT STEMLEAF NPPLOT
/COMPARE GROUPS
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.

Explore
Notes
Output Created 07-OCT-2020 [Link]
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet3
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 15
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
for dependent variables are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases
with no missing values for
any dependent variable or
factor used.
Syntax EXAMINE
VARIABLES=VAR00001
VAR00002 VAR00003
VAR00004
/PLOT BOXPLOT
STEMLEAF NPPLOT
/COMPARE GROUPS
/STATISTICS
DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.
Resources Processor Time [Link],37
Elapsed Time [Link],98

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
p1 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%
p2 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%
p3 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%
p4 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%

Descriptives
Statistic Std. Error
p1 Mean 59.0667 4.84175
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 48.6821
Mean Upper Bound 69.4512
5% Trimmed Mean 58.9630
Median 54.0000
Variance 351.638
Std. Deviation 18.75202
Minimum 34.00
Maximum 86.00
Range 52.00
Interquartile Range 31.00
Skewness .312 .580
Kurtosis -1.366 1.121
p2 Mean 60.1333 4.17460
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 51.1797
Mean Upper Bound 69.0870
5% Trimmed Mean 60.0926
Median 56.0000
Variance 261.410
Std. Deviation 16.16816
Minimum 34.00
Maximum 87.00
Range 53.00
Interquartile Range 31.00
Skewness .295 .580
Kurtosis -.799 1.121
p3 Mean 57.1333 4.93372
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 46.5516
Mean Upper Bound 67.7151
5% Trimmed Mean 57.4259
Median 65.0000
Variance 365.124
Std. Deviation 19.10821
Minimum 23.00
Maximum 86.00
Range 63.00
Interquartile Range 41.00
Skewness -.386 .580
Kurtosis -1.037 1.121
p4 Mean 53.6000 4.69731
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 43.5253
Mean Upper Bound 63.6747
5% Trimmed Mean 53.4444
Median 54.0000
Variance 330.971
Std. Deviation 18.19262
Minimum 23.00
Maximum 87.00
Range 64.00
Interquartile Range 32.00
Skewness .175 .580
Kurtosis -.680 1.121

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
p1 .173 15 .200 .893 15 .075
p2 .159 15 .200 .938 15 .356
p3 .193 15 .138 .932 15 .291
p4 .114 15 .200 .970 15 .852

p1

p1 Stem-and-Leaf Plot
Frequency Stem & Leaf

2,00 3 . 44
4,00 4 . 4555
3,00 5 . 446
1,00 6 . 5
2,00 7 . 66
3,00 8 . 666

Stem width: 10,00


Each leaf: 1 case(s)
p2

p2 Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

1,00 3 . 4
4,00 4 . 5555
3,00 5 . 666
3,00 6 . 455
2,00 7 . 66
2,00 8 . 77

Stem width: 10,00


Each leaf: 1 case(s)
p3

p3 Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

4,00 0 . 2333
3,00 0 . 455
7,00 0 . 6666777
1,00 0 . 8

Stem width: 100,00


Each leaf: 1 case(s)
p4

p4 Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

4,00 0 . 2333
6,00 0 . 445555
4,00 0 . 6677
1,00 0 . 8

Stem width: 100,00


Each leaf: 1 case(s)
NPAR TESTS
/FRIEDMAN=VAR00001 VAR00002 VAR00003 VAR00004
/MISSING LISTWISE.

NPar Tests

Notes
Output Created 07-OCT-2020 [Link]
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet3
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data 15
File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values
are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for all tests are
based on cases with no
missing data for any variables
used.
Syntax NPAR TESTS
/FRIEDMAN=VAR00001
VAR00002 VAR00003
VAR00004
/MISSING LISTWISE.
Resources Processor Time [Link],02
Elapsed Time [Link],01
Number of Cases Allowed 349525

Friedman Test
Ranks
Mean Rank
p1 2.47
p2 2.70
p3 2.60
p4 2.23

Test Statistics
N 15
Chi-Square 1.170
df 3
Asymp. Sig. .760

You might also like