Hard power’s key to soft power – provides the legitimacy to back up diplomatic
commitments
Holmes, 09 (Kim R. Holmes, Ph.D., Distinguished Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, assistant secretary of state
under Bush, 6-1-2009, "Sustaining American Leadership with Military Power", Heritage Foundation,
[Link]
DA: 7-9-2015)
The Importance of Sustaining Military Power The consequences of hard-power atrophy will be a direct
deterioration of America's diplomatic clout. This is already on display in the western Pacific Ocean, where
America's ability to hedge against the growing ambitions of a rising China is being called into question by some
of our key Asian allies. Recently, Australia released a defense White Paper that is concerned primarily with the
potential decline of U.S. military primacy and the implications that this decline would have for Australian
security and stability in the Asia-Pacific. These developments are anything but reassuring. The ability of the
United States to reassure friends, deter competitors, coerce belligerent states, and defeat enemies does not
rest on the strength of our political leaders' commitment to diplomacy; it rests on the foundation of a
powerful military. Only by retaining a "big stick" can the United States succeed in advancing its diplomatic
priorities. Only by building a full-spectrum military force can America reassure its many friends and allies and
count on their future support.