NAAC

Institutional Assessment and Accreditation

(Effective from July 2017)
Accreditation - (Cycle: 1)

R. C. PATEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST'S INSTITUTE OF

MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,
SHIRPUR, SHIRPUR, Maharashtra
Track ID : MHCOGN101854
AISHE-ID : C-8868

Graphical Representation based on Quantitative

& Qualitative Metrics
 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL
An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission
P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA

Graphical Representation based on Quantitative &

Qualitative Metrics
 Metrics(QnM & QlM) Weightage scored by the institution in percentage
Curricular Aspects

100
QnM & QlM Weightage scored by
the institution in percentage
Institutional Values Teaching-learning
and Best Practices and Evaluation

50

Governance, Research,
Leadership and Innovations and
Management Extension

Infrastructure and
Student Support
Learning
and Progression
Resources

Fig: The criterion wise distribution of weighted scores (QnM & QlM) for the institution
 Cu
rr
ic
ul
ar
Ac
Pl GPA
ad 0
1
2
3
4
5

Cu em ann
rr ic in
ic Fl g …
ul
um exi
Fe b
En ilit
St ed ric y
ud b hm
en ack
t …
Sa Sys
te
Ph tis
ys f ac m
ic tio
IT al F n
M In ac …
ai fr ili
nt as tie
en tru s
St
ud anc ctu
re
Ca ent e o
te P fC
rin rog a…
Te g r
ac to ess
hi S io
Ev ng- tud n
al
u L ea
en
t…
St ati r
ud on nin
en Pr g
t o …
Ex Pe ces
te rf
o s
ns r …
io ma
n nc
Li
Ac …
br C tiv
ar olla iti
y bo e s
Al as ra
um a tio
L ea n
In ni
st E rn
itu nga in
Fa t ge …
cu ion m
lty al en
Em is V t
Fi i
na p on
Key Indicators

In
nc
ia
ow …
l er
te m
rn Ma e…
In a l Q ag n
st
it u al
em
St uti it …
ud on y A
en a l D ss…
Te t is
ac En ti
he rol nc…
Re r P lm
so ro en
f t
In urc ile …
no e an
va Mo d
bi …
Re tio l
se n E iza
ar co ti…
ch sy
Pu ste
S bl …
St tud ic
e
Comparison of QnM & QlM in Key Indicators based on performance(GPA)

ud at
en nt io
St t Su …
Fig: The comparison of Key Indicators (QnM & QlM) based on grade point average(GPA) extracted from the institution

ra Par pp
te tic or
In g i t
st y D pat
itu ev io
tio e …
na lop
lV m
…
Be alu
st es
Pr …
Low Performance Key Indicators

ac
High Performance Key Indicators

tic
es
Average Performance Key Indicators
 Cu
rr
ic
ul GPA
ar
0
1
2
3
4
5

Ac Pl
ad an
e n in
m …
ic
Fl
3.5

Cu e xi
rr
ic bi
lit
ul
um y
4

Fe En
e db
ric
h…
ac
k
3.17

St Sy
ud s te
en
t m
4

En
Te ro
ac llm
h er e…
Pr
2

St of
ud ile
en an
t …
Sa
1.5

Re tis
so fa
u rc
ct
i…
e
In M
3.55

no ob
va ili
za
t io …
n
Re Ec
0.43

s ea os
rc ys
h …
LPKI (0-2.0)
1

Pu
Ph b lic
ys at
ic i…
al
0.2

Fa
IT ci
li
tie
In
fr s
M as
tr
3.67

ai
nt u ct
HPKI (3.01-4.0)

en ur
an e
ce
3.53

St o fC
ud a…
en
t
3.5

St Su
ud
en pp
Fig: Comparison of LPKI(0-2.0) and HPKI(3.01-4.0) based on QnM & QlM

t or
Comparison of LPKI and HPKI based on QnM & QlM

Pr t
2

St og
ud r es
en si
t on
Pa
r tic
3.56

St
ra ip
te at
gy i…
D
e
0.6

In
st ve
itu lo
tio p…
2

na
lV
al
Be ue
st …
Pr
1.78

ac
tic
es
2
 Distribution of High Performance Key Indicators (3.01-4.0)

Student Progression: Curricular Planning and Implementation:

11.0% 10.8%
Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure: Academic Flexibility:
10.8% 12.3%

IT Infrastructure: Curriculum Enrichment:

10.9% 9.8%
Physical Facilities:
11.3% Feedback System:
12.3%
Student Satisfaction Survey:
10.9%
Fig: High Performance Key Indicators(3.01-4.0) for the institution
 Distribution of Average Performance Key Indicators (2.01-3.0)

Institutional Distinctiveness: Catering to Student Diversity:

8.8% 8.8%
Financial Management and Resource Mobilization: Teaching- Learning Process:
6.8% 8.8%
Faculty Empowerment Strategies: Evaluation Process and Reforms:
7.4% 7.9%
Institutional Vision and Leadership: Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:
7.3% 6.6%
Alumni Engagement: Extension Activities:
7.8% 8.0%
Library as a Learning Resource: Collaboration:
8.2% 7.3%
Fig: Average Performance Key Indicators(2.01-3.0) for the institution
 Distribution of Low Performance Key Indicators (0-2.0)

Best Practices: Student Enrollment and Profile:

14.8% 14.8%

Teacher Profile and Quality:

Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities: 11.1%
13.2%
Resource Mobilization for Research:
3.2%
Innovation Ecosystem:
7.4%
Strategy Development and Deployment:
14.8% Research Publications and Awards:
1.5%
Student Participation and Activities:
4.4% Student Support:
14.8%

Fig: Low Performance Key Indicators(0-2.0) for the institution

 Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average
5
4 3.25 3.42
3 2.49 2.24 2.17 2.09

GPA
1.81
2
1
0

d…

a…

e…
ct

ad
ng

va

u
pe

an

Le

al
or
no
ni
As

lV
re

pp
ar

e,
In

na
ar

le

Su

nc
ct
h,
g-
ul

io
ru

na
rc

t
ic

ut
in

en
t

er
rr

ea

as
h

it
ud
Cu

ac

ov

st
fr
s
Re

In
In
Te

St

G
Criteria GPA

Fig: Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average

 Benchmark Value

0
1
2
3
4
5

1.
1.
1
3

1.
1.
2
4

1.
1.
3
4

1.
2.
1
4

1.
2.
2
1.
2.
3
4

1.
3.
1
3

1.
3.
2
3

1.
3.
3
4

1.
4.
1
4

1.
4.
2
4

2.
1.
1
2

2.
1.
2
2

2.
1.
3
2.
2.
1
3

2.
2.
2
3

2.
2.
3
Score

2.
3.
1
3

Metrics

2.
3.
2
4

2.
3.
3
3

2.
3.
Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria I & II

4
2

2.
4.
1
4

2.
4.
2
0

2.
4.
3
2

2.
4.
4
0

2.
4.
5
2

2.
5.
1
2

2.
5.
2
3
Performance of metrics in Curricular Aspects, Teaching-learning and Evaluation

2.
5.
3
2

2.
5.
4
4

2.
6.
1
1

2.
6.
2
2

2.
6.
3
3

2.
7.
1
3.55
 Performance of metrics in Research, Innovations and Extension, Infrastructure and Learning Resources
5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Benchmark Value
4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
2 2 2 2
2
1 1
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1

.3

2
1.

1.

2.

2.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

4.

4.

4.

4.

5.

5.

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

3.

3.

3.

3.

4.

4.
1
3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.
Metrics

Score

Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria III & IV

 Performance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management,
Institutional Values and Best Practices
5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Benchmark Value
4
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2
1 1 1 1 1
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
1

.3

.4

.2

11

13

15

17

19

1
1.

1.

1.

2.

3.

4.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

4.

5.

5.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

3.
2

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.
5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

6.

6.

6.

6.

6.

6.

6.

6.

6.

7.

7.

7.

7.

7.

7.
7.

7.

7.

7.

7.
Metrics

Score

Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria V,VI & VII

 Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and
III)
5

3
Score
2

0
2

.3

.2

.3

.1

1
2.

2.

4.

4.

1.

1.

3.

3.

3.

3.

4.

1.

1.

2.

3.

4.

4.

3.

5.

3.
1

4
1.

2.

2.

2.

2.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

3.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

2.

3.
Metrics

Score

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)
 Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI
and
5
VII)
4

3
Score
2

0
4

10

11

15

12

13

14

16
3.

1.

1.

2.

3.

4.

4.

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.

2.

2.

3.

3.

4.

1.

1.

2.

2.

4.

3.

1.
1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.
4.

5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

6.

7.

7.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

4.

5.

5.

5.

5.

5.

6.

7.
7.

7.

7.

7.

7.

7.

7.
Metrics

Score

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)
Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)
1.2.2
3.3.1 4 2.1.3
2.5.4 2.2.3
Score
2.4.1 2.4.2

2.3.2 2 2.4.4

1.4.2 3.1.2

0
1.4.1 3.1.3

1.3.3 3.2.2

1.2.3 3.3.2

1.2.1 3.3.3

1.1.3 3.3.4
1.1.2 3.3.5
3.4.2

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)
Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)
7.1.16 4.3.4 5.1.2
4
7.1.14 5.1.5
7.1.13 5.2.3 Score
7.1.12 5.3.1

7.1.1 5.4.2
2

6.3.3 6.4.2

5.4.3 7.1.10
0
5.2.2 7.1.11

5.2.1 7.1.15

5.1.6 7.1.3

5.1.3 7.1.4

4.4.1 4.1.3
4.3.3 4.1.4
4.3.2 4.2.3
4.2.6 4.2.5

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)