What is the Satyam scam about?
It is about corporate governance and fraudulent auditing practices allegedly
in connivance with auditors and chartered accountants. The company
misrepresented its accounts both to its board, stock exchanges, regulators,
investors and all other stakeholders.
Deontology: is the study of that which an “obligation of duty and consequent action based
on moral judgment determine whether the person, business or any actor has complied
to.
Ramalinga Raju actions were ethically in contrast with what is expected from the leader
of any organization. He put his greed and ambitions before his duties towards his
company, employers and stakeholders and did not hesitate from falsifying the
accounting books for years ignoring all moral obligations towards them.
· Consequentialism26: is the judgment on right or wrong based on the consequences of
action taken or conduct of individual, company et al.
It is quite evident that Ramalinga Raju’s letter inflated numbers in his Account books, he
miscalculated the consequences of his unlawful actions in long term. Since company
was doing well in terms of business (on papers) stakeholders were happy, Raju chose
to conveniently overlook the approaching disaster. In his own words “It was like riding a
tiger without knowing how to get off without being eaten” After his last attempt to fill the
fictitious asset with real ones failed, he had to come face to face with the disastrous
consequences of his unethical actions.
Virtue Ethics29: Satyam prescribed itself to some great virtues and principles, though
their conduct is completely opposite of what they claim to be. Ramalinga Raju flouted
every rule in the book of corporate governance to fulfill his hunger and greed for power
and money. If the conduct was ethical it would act parallel to the virtues expected by
stakeholders. Out here virtues like Sustainability, Honesty and Integrity were only
preached but not practiced. The act is based more on greed of making profits at the cost
of shareholder’s money.