Table 10.1 Population Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard
SEVERI
TY OF
BARA HAZARD EXPOSURE VULNERABILITY CONSE RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
NGAY
QUENC
E
B C D E F G
Percentage
of Percentage
Estimate Population population Percenta
Likelih
Hazard ood of (flood Barangay d Density Affecte Percentag living in Percentage ge of of Percentage Access to Houeshold Government
A Exposed Exposure of young Households of Philhealt
residenti per d area e of dwelling people Post capacity to Capacity to Governmen
(i.e. Populatio al area
Hectare of (hectar Populatio Percenta Informal units with
and old Living malnourish Score Score Category h
Occurr depth) n n (2) ge (3) dependent
with
below the ed
Disaster
Coverage
relocate or Generate t Resources
Flood) (hectares Residential es) Settlers walls made disabiliti Financing to retrofit Job
ence s poverty individuals
) Area (1) of light to es
threshold
savageable
materials
Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
(1) Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area = Barangay Population/Estimated residential area (hectares)
(2) Exposed Population = Population Density per Hectare of Residential Area X Affected area (hectares)
(3) Exposure Percentage = Exposed Population / Barangay Population
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard using the suggested indicative scoring below:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1
3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Population exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed
elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 20% of the population are affected and in need of immediate assistance.
High (3): >10 - <20% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Moderate (2): >5%-10% of affected population in need of immediate assistance
Low (1): < 5% of the affected population in need of immediate assistance
5. In column F, compute and categorize the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk
categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
Table 10.2 Natural Resources Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:
SEVERIT
BARANG Y OF
AY HAZARD EXPOSURE VULNERABILITY RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
CONSEQ
UENCE
B C D E F G
Percentage
Number Percentage Percentag Agricultural Alternati
Likelih Area by Average of farming Percentage
Hazard ood of (flood dominan Exposed farming of Percentage e of areas Access to Extension Early ve Governme
Exposure potential Exposed families of farmers
Dominant Area families who production of areas with with
(i.e. t crop Percentage income per Value using with access Insuranc Services of Warning Livelihoo nt
Occurr depth) (hectares crop (hectares) (2) hectare per (Php) (3) attended sustainble to hazard area with irrigation water
Flood) (1) climate field infrastructur coverage impound e the Local Systems d Resources
ence ) year (Php) production information
schools e coverafe ment Government
techniques
A Score Score Category
Instructions
:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
(1) GIS Derived
(2) Exposure Percentage = Exposed Area / Area by dominant crop
(3) Exposed Value (Php) = Average potential income per hectare per year X Exposed Area (hectares)
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1
3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Natural Resources exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the
combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): > 40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
High (3): 20 to <40% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
Moderate (2): 10 to <20% of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as shponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
Low (1): < 10% and below of of exposed production areas/means of livelihood such as fishponds, crops, poultry and livestock and other agricultural/forest products are severely damaged
5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
Table 10.3 Critical Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:
SEVERITY
BARANG OF
HAZARD EXPOSURE VULNERABILITY RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
AY CONSEQU
ENCE
B C D E F G
Capacity
(Bed/ Structure
A Hazard Likelihood of (flood Facility Exposed Classroom Wall Existing employing Insurance Local Government
(i.e. Storey Materials Condition hazard Score Score Category Resources for Risk
Occurrence depth) Type Area capacity, Coverage
Flood) Used resistant Mitigation
Loading
capacity) design
Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1
3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Critical Facilities exposure and Vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping),
and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4):Damages may lead to the disruption of services which may last one week or more
High (3): Damages lead may to the disruption of services which may last three days to less than a week
Moderate (2): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting for one day to less than three days
Low (1): Damages may lead to the disruption of service lasting less than one day
5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories,
reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
Table 10.4 Lifeline Facilities Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:
SEVERITY
OF
BARANGAY HAZARD EXPOSURE VULNERABILITY CONSEQU RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
ENCE
B C D E F G
Likelihood Exposed Hazard Available
A Hazard (i.e. of (flood Replacement Value of Surface Existing Insurance
Road Road length
Cost per linear exposed Resistant Score Score Category Government
Flood) Occurrenc depth) Name Classification
kilometer (Php)
(linear
lifeline (1) type Condition Design Coverage Resources
e kilometers)
Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1
3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Lifeline Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the
vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4):Disruption of service by lasting one week or more (for Municipalities) and one day for Highly Urbanized Areas
High (3): Disruption of service by approximately five days for municipalities and less than 18 hour disruption for highly urbanized area
Moderate (2): Disruption of service by approximately three days for municipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas
Low (1): Disruption of service by approximately one day for municipalities and less than six hour disruption for highly urbanized areas
5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the
risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
Table 10.5 Urban Use Exposure Table, Municipality/City of ___________________.
Hazard:
SEVERITY
BARANG HAZARD EXPOSURE VULNERABILITY OF RISK ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
AY CONSEQUE
NCE
B C D E F G
Percent
age of Percentage No
Percentage Capacity And Local
Area per of buildings building of structures access/area Willingness Government
Hazard Likelihoo
d of
Existing
(flood land use land use Exposed
Percent Replaceme
Exposed with walls
in not coverage to
to Retrofit or Available Capacity to
age of nt Cost per dilapida employing infrastructu Insurance Government
(i.e. per area in Value made with ted/ Relocate or Coverage Alternative Resources Impose/
Flood) Occurren depth) (Specfic category in hectares Exposur Sq. Meter (Php) (2) light to
hazard- re-related
Conform Sites Implement
ce Use) e (1) (PhP) condem resistant hazard
hectares savageable ned building mitigation with New Zoning
materials Regulations Regulations
conditio design measures
n
A Score Score Category
Instructions:
1. Identify in Column A the barangays affected by the hazard based on the overlay of the hazard map and the base exposure map.
(1) Percentage of Exposure = Exposed area in hectares/Area per land use per category in hectares
(2) Exposed Value= Exposed area in hectares X 10,000 X Replacement Cost per Sq. Meter (PhP)
2. In column B, assign the likelihood of occurence of the hazard:
Frequent (1-3 years): 6
Moderate (4-10 years): 5
Occasional Slight Chance (11-30 years): 4
Improbable (31 - 100 years): 3
Rare (101-200 years): 2
Very Rare (>200 years): 1
3. Using the gathered data and maps, indicate information and values for each Urban Use Facilities exposure and vulnerability indicators, Columns C and D respectively.
4. In column E, assigning the severity of consequence score shall be based on expected magnitude of the hazard (hazard characterization), the extent of exposure (determined through hazard exposure mapping), and the vulnerabilities of the exposed elements (compiled in the exposure
database), the combination of which will be the basis for determining the severity of consequence rating.
Very High (4): ≥40% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or≥20% of residential structures are severely damaged
High (3): >20 to <40% of nonresidential structures are severely damaged or >10-20% of residential structures are severely damaged
Moderate (2): >10 to 20% of non-residential structures are severely damaged or>5 to10% of residential structures are severely damaged
Low (1): < 10% of non-residential structures are severely damagedor ≤5% of residential structures are severely damaged
5. In column F, compute the risk by multiplying Likelihood of Occurrence Score (Column B) and Severity of Consequences Score (Column E). Based on the derived risk scores and corresponding risk categories, reclassify the risk scores into risk categories.
Low: 1-4
Moderate: 6-10
High: 12-24
6. In colum G, provide existing adaptive or preventive measures of the muncipality/city.
Table 11. Disaster Risk Assessment Summary Matrix
System of Interest: population
Hazard:
Decision Area/s Technical Findings Implications Policy Interventions
A B C D
Instructions:
A. Based on the risks maps generated for the various exposure units, highlight and identify decision areas or elements. Decision areas can be the barangay or specific sites
in the barangay such as coastal area, mountain sides, and riverbanks.
- identify decision areas in need of intervention based on the generated risk maps
- This can be identified as high to moderate risk areas or may pertain to a specific area in the barangay
B. List down the significant findings/observed conditions and causes by describing the area or element in terms of the level of risk, highlighting the various contributing
factors such as exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity.
- identify the hazard and how these may manifest in the identified decision area
- expound on the exposure information (i.e. number of affected population, exposure percentage, exposed area, and cost)
- highlight relevant sensitivities of the exposed element to the identified hazard
- highlight relevant adaptive capacity indicators of the exposed element to the identified hazard
C. List down the planning/development implications when the identified risks in the various decision areas are not addressed.
- highlight potential impact as mentioned in the sectoral impact chains
- highlight future scenario if risks are not addressed
- identify future needs with emphasis on the spatial framework plan of the municipality
D. Identify various policy interventions that should seek to reduce the level of risks by addressing the exposure, sensitivity, with consideration to the current adaptive
capacities
- identify the various disaster risk adaptation and mitigation measures to reduce into an acceptable and tolerable levels.
