Lecture
Six Sigma Problem-Solving Models
L 01: Introduction to Problem-Solving Models (20/04/2016)
Agenda
Organizational Matters
Introduction to the models of problem-solving
Motivation
Trial and Error
Learning by Doing
Creative Problem Solving
General Problem-Solving Model
PDCA Cycle
Problem Solving Star
Six Sigma DMAIC
Comparative Summary
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models
Page 2
Organizational Matters
Course Outline
Place: Pascalstraße 8-9, PTZ 001
Time: Wednesday, 8:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
first lecture: 04/20/2016
Script: GPE Office
Additional Source
Lecture Slides: GPE Online System
Main Exam Source
1 day before each lecture as PDF
Lecturer Prof. Dr.-Ing. Roland Jochem
Tel.: +49 (0) 30 / 314 22005
E-Mail:
[email protected]QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 3
Organizational Matters
Course Outline
Scientific Team:
Dipl.-Ing. Phillip Karcher
Tel.: 030/39006-181
E-Mail: [email protected]
Dipl.-Ing. Christoffer Rybski
Tel.:030/39006-180
E-Mail:
[email protected]Secretary: Anja Herzberg
Quality Science Department
Pascalstr. 8-9, Room 403
Tel.: 030/314-22005
E-Mail:
[email protected]QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 4
Organizational Matters
Pass Conditions
Practical classes General Requirements:
- Participating in all practical classes
- Successful presentation of the group work results
Dates:
- May 29, 2016: Six Sigma Project Selection & House of Quality
- July 02, 2016: Failure Mode & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
- July 03, 2016: DoE & Taguchi
- July 09, 2016: Final Presentation
Location and time:
- Location: Pascalstraße 8-9; PTZ 407
- Time: 9:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.
Final Exam - July 6, 2016: Final Exam Preparation
- July 20, 2016: Final Exam, 1st option
- Sept. 28, 2016: Final Exam, 2nd option
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 5
Organizational Matters
Course Agenda: Six Sigma Problem-Solving
L 01 Introduction to Problem Solving Models 04/20/2016
L 02 History and Definition of Six Sigma 04/27/2016
Qualification-/Organizational Concept, Implementation Concepts 05/04/2016
L 03
and Variations of Six Sigma
L 04 The DMAIC Cycle 05/11/2016
L 05 Define 05/18/2016
L 06 Measure1 05/25/2016
L 07 Measure 2 06/01/2016
L 08 Analyze 1 06/08/2016
L 09 Analyze 2 06/15/2016
L 10 Improve 06/22/2016
L 11 Control 06/29/2016
L 12 Final Exam Preparation 07/06/2016
L 13 Buffer for canceled lectures 07/13/2016
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 6
Course Structure
L 11 L5
Control Define
L 10 L6&7
Improve Measure
L8&9
Analyze
L 01 Problem-Solving Models
L 02 Development and Definition of Six Sigma
L 03 Variations, Qualification Concept, Implementation Concepts
L 04 The DMAIC Cycle
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 11
Agenda
Organizational Matters
Introduction to problem solving models
Motivation
Trial and Error
Learning by Doing
Creative Problem Solving
General Problem-Solving Model
PDCA Cycle
Problem Solving Star
Six Sigma DMAIC
Comparative Summary
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models
Page 12
Motivation
Problem-elimination process
Detect Analyze Develop Test Implement Lessons
problem causes measures measures measures learned
vigilance: quickness: sustainability:
identify problems early remedy error avoid future Errors
fast and effective
Increases customer satisfaction and creates transparency
Accelerates decisions
A „good Optimizes the use of resources
problem- Avoids loss of image
elimination Reduces quality costs
process:
Optimizes products that are already on the market fast and effectively
Increases the maturity level of new products
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 13
Trial and Error
Trial and Error
Definition, Advantages and Disadvantages
Problem solving method, characterized by repeated, varied attempts of all
Trial and feasible solutions which are continued until the desired solution is found
Error
Possibility of failure is consciously accepted
Alternative solutions must be available and feasible
Prerequisite
Mistakes must not lead to a „catastrophe“
No specific skills required
Advantages Supports innovative problem solving
High learning effect
Time consuming and costly
Dis- Does not always provide the best solution
advantages Does not offer all solutions
Provides no way to identify the cause of the problem
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 15
Trial and Error
Development and Areas of Application
Biology Programming
Chemistry
Biology &
psychology: Simulation
Pharmacy
Thorndike, …
1850 1900 1950
Biology: Biology and Cybernatics: Sociology
Darwin psychology: W.R. Ashby
O.W. Holmes
and H.S.
Teaching
Jennings
Psychology
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 16
Trial and Error
Example – way of the knight
1 2 3 4 5
The knight should be drawn across the board so that it
meets each field exactly once.
1 1 12 17 6 25
Trial and Error procedure:
1. Make a list of all moves possible from location (1,1) 2
16 7 1
2 11 18
(3,2); (2,3)
2. Choose your next move from the list (3,2)
3. If the move is acceptable, draw there and tag the 3 13 20
1 15 24 5
field. Jump back to step 1.
Knight at (3,2) new list: (1,3); (2,4);…; (1,1)
Jump to step 2. if move is not acceptable. 4 8 3 22 19 10
choose a move from the list other than (1,1)
5. Repeat steps 1. to 4. until every field was met or no
5 21 14 9 4 23
solution can be found.
It is possible to solve the „problem“ in 24
moves.
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 17
Trial and Error
Example - Dashboard VW UP
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 19
Learning by Doing
Learning by Doing
Motivation
Real environment
Simulation and
games example: project work
Books and
presentations
Lerning form
Memory after 3 weeks 70 % 72 % 85 %
Memory after 3 month 10 % 32 % 65 %
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 21
Learning by Doing
Definition, characteristics
Acquisition of knowledge or skills through direct experience in the execution of
a task
Learning by mostly under supervision as part of a training or induction of new
Doing employees (training on the job)
also emphasized: practical knowledge that is acquired through
observation of experienced employees
Self-organisation and self-responsibility
User orientation
Situational and society related
Charac- Product and action orientation
teristics Interdisciplinarity
Targeted planning
Social learning in the project
Common organization of learning processes
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 22
Learning by Doing
Aspects
Positive error culture at the company (learning from mistakes)
Prerequisite
Great latitude for decisions at workplace
Less suitable
Workplaces and processes in which errors cause high costs
for
Confounding Lack of motivation
factors Unclear formulated learning objectives
Low costs, because learning takes place directly at the workplace
Costs
Costs may arise from slowing down the work process
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 23
Learning by Doing
Examples
Job rotation
Practices at the learning-factory
Action-oriented lessons
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 24
Creative Problem Solving (CPS)
Creative Problem Solving
Process of CPS
• Fluent and flexible thinking
Generate ideas • Original thinking
• Elaborative thinking
Evaluate
tasks
Understand problem Planning measures
1. Identify difficulties 1. Select solutions/ ideas
2. Generate data 2. Ensure acceptance
3. Define problem
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 27
Creative Problem Solving
Example - Process of CPS
Characteristics of the phase Example
Broad problem „We want to attract new
1. Identify difficulties Broad, short and power optimizing customers!“
Understand
problem
Determine facts, opinions, impressions, „The marked is
2. Generate data
fears, etc. to identify basic problem (e.g. 6 Ws) saturated.“
„How can the buying
3. Define problem Determine specific question to work with
decision be influenced?“
• Fluent thinking Many solutions
Price cut, color
Generate
• Flexible thinking Variations of a new solution selection, extend
ideas
functions,
• Original thinking Unusual solutions „Buy one - get one free“
etc.
• Elaborative thinking Few detailed solutions
maesures
1. Select solutions/ Evaluate alternative solutions (e.g. cost–utility
Planning
ideas analysis), select and implement Price cut, color
selection, innovators
2. Ensure acceptance Consider advocates and detractors
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 28
PDCA Cycle
PDCA Cycle
Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
Definition/ Continual search for causes of errors in order to improve operations
Aim and systems within the company on a permanent basis
Act
Check Plan
Do
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 32
PDCA Cycle
Content
Develop a plan to remedy
If measures are the problem
successful:
Establish as the A P
new standard
ACT PLAN
Determine results CHECK DO
of measures and
assess the Execution of the
efficiency C D Plan
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 33
PDCA cycle
Content
Standardize solutions, Describe problems
or Determine main cause
Search for new solutions A P Develop solutions
Refine solutions Plan measures
ACT PLAN
Measure results CHECK DO Implement measures
Recognize target Ensure
deviation C D implementation of
measures
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 34
PDCA cycle
Example – Customer complaints are not processed uniformly
Standardize and Problem: there is no
Optimize: standardized complaint
The new process proved to be management
effective and suitable to Objective: A structured
improve complaint
A P process to deal with complaints
management; therefore it will is to be introduced
be introduced as a new Measure: An enterprise-wide
standard. At the same time ACT PLAN valid concept including
further optimization potentials appropriate procedures and
are sought. documents is to be implemented
Review: CHECK DO
Through interviews with
employees is analyzed Implementation:
whether the requirements of In a project team a globally valid
the new process are
C D complaint management process is
understood and defined; staff is trained to the
implemented. process accordingly
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 35
Problem-Solving Star
Problem-Solving Star
12 Steps of Problem-Solving
Team building
Prevent Define
recurrence problem
1
Verify 12 2 Take immediate
effects measures
11 3
Implement 10 4 Collect
solution data
9 5
Analyze
Declare 8 6
7 data
solution
Evaluate Determine
solutions Search for
causes
solutions
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 37
Problem-Solving Star
Content of Problem-Solving Steps
Steps Content
Put together a group of specialists able to work in a team to solve the
1. Build team
problem
Describe problem clearly so that the group gains unanimous
2. Define problem understanding
Create a project plan
3. Take immediate Find quick solution for the customer
measures Contain the extent of losses
Decide what data is relevant to the problem
4. Collect data Select methods for evaluating
Collect and file data in a fast and economic manner
5. Analyze data Evaluate data and identify important causes of the problem
Confirm causality (cause-and-effect) for the Problem
6. Determine causes
Determine causes for which solutions are foreseeable
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 38
Problem-Solving Star
Content of Problem-Solving Steps
Steps Content
7. Search for solutions Find as many solutions as possible for each of the major causes
8. Evaluate solutions Determine the advantages and disadvantages of each solution
Declare one or more solutions
9. Declare solution
Determine implementation procedures
10. Implement solution Implement solutions according to plan
Compare effects with expectations
11. Verify effects
Determine costs for improvement actions
Introduce improvement measures as new standard
12. Prevent recurrence
Determine future proceeding
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 39
Six Sigma
Six Sigma
DMAIC Cycle
Understanding the problem and its
financial impact
Ensure success C D
Team building
Control Define
Improve Measure Develop and execute
I M
Generate, select, a data collection plan
and implement adapted to the
Analyze problem
improvements
A
Determine the underlying causes
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 41
Comparison of Problem-Solving Models
Comparison of Problem-Solving Models/ Methods
Q7: The seven quality tools QFD: Quality Function Deployment
M7: The seven management tools FMEA: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
K7: The seven creativity toolds SPC: Statistical process control
DoE: Design of Experiments
Characteristics Trial & Error Learning Creative PDCA Cycle Problem- Six Sigma
by Doing Problem Solving Star
Solving
Specific Direct work Business, Business, Business, Sub-processes,
Field of problem with environment workplace, workplace, workplace, process steps
improvement few alternative etc. etc. etc.
solutions
Choose Expand All kind of Improve all Improve all Systematic reduction
solution level open, creative activities activities of errors or deviations
knowledge solutions within the within the and continuous
Aim
company on a company on a improvement of
permanent permanent processes
basis basis
Tools/ None None Creativity tools Q7, M7, K7, Q7, M7, K7, Q7, M7,QFD, FMEA,
Methods etc. etc. SPC, DoE, etc.
Project with expert
Organization None None Project Project Project
support
Motivation Motivation Training of the Training of the Training of the Intensive training,
Prerequisites K7 Q7, M7, K7,… Q7, M7, K7,… special organization
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 43
Six Sigma
Course Structure
L 11
L 5 Define
Control
L 10 L6&7
Improve Measure
L8&9
Analyze
L 01 Problem-Solving Models
L 02 Development and Definition of Six Sigma
L 03 Variations, Qualification Concept, Implementation Concepts
L 04 The DMAIC Cycle
QM II | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jochem | L 01: Introduction to problem-solving models 20/04/2016
Page 44