Diversity 2010, 2, 1158-1180; doi:10.

3390/d2111158
OPEN ACCESS

diversity
ISSN 1424-2818
[Link]/journal/diversity

Article

Distribution of the Genus Passiflora L. Diversity in Colombia

and Its Potential as an Indicator for Biodiversity Management
in the Coffee Growing Zone
John Ocampo 1,2,*, Geo Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge 3 and Andy Jarvis 1
1
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), A.A. 6713, Cali, Colombia;
E-Mail: [Link]@[Link]
2
Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Palmira (UNAPAL), Kra. 32 Chapinero, vía Candelaria,
Palmira, Valle del Cauca, Colombia
3
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD),
UMR 5175 CEFE, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France;
E-Mail: [Link]@[Link]

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: jaocampop@[Link];

Tel.: +57-2-4450000; Fax: +57-2-4450076.

Received: 25 September 2010; in revised form: 29 October 2010 / Accepted: 4 November 2010 /
Published: 15 November 2010

Abstract: Analysis was made of 3,923 records of 162 wild Passiflora specimens to assess
the distribution of their diversity in Colombia, identify collection gaps, and explore their
potential as indicator species. Despite variable collecting density among and within
biogeographic regions, the Andean region clearly presents a higher species richness,
particularly in the central coffee growing zone and the departments of Antioquia,
Cundinamarca and Valle del Cauca. The elevational distribution of diversity shows a small
peak below 500 m, and two higher ones between 1,000–2,000 and 2,500–3,000 m. This
pattern corresponds to divergent adaptive trends among infrageneric divisions. The analysis
on 19 climatic variables showed that the two principal variance components, explaining
77 percent of the total, are respectively associated with temperature and precipitation,
without influence of seasonality. Distribution parameters allow recognizing more than 36
narrow endemics. Prediction of species distribution showed nine areas with very high
richness (predicted sympatry of 41 to 54 species) in the Andean region, three of which
correspond to collection gaps. Endemics were not particularly frequent there, so a
Diversity 2010, 2 1159

prioritization of protected areas based on species richness would not favor their
conservation. The sites with high Passiflora diversity are poorly represented in the current
system of protected areas. Instead, their striking correspondence with ecotopes of the coffee
growing zone imposes a conservation strategy integrating agricultural and environmental
management at the landscape level. Reciprocally, several traits of Passiflora species make
them particularly suited as indicators for any effort of conservation or restoration in this
region of importance for the country.

Keywords: Andes; coffee growing zone; Colombia; biodiversity indicators; endemism;

geographic information systems

1. Introduction

Colombia is divided into five main biogeographic regions [1]. The Andean region presents a highly
diverse topography (100–5,400 m), with three mountain ranges, the Eastern, Central and Western
Cordilleras, separating two main inter-Andean valleys from the other regions. The uplift of the Andes
created new habitats and increased local isolation, favoring high speciation rates in many taxa [2]. The
continuously humid climate of the Amazonian and Orinoquian lowlands and the extremely wet climate
of the Pacific region contrasts with the drier and more seasonal climate of the Caribbean. As a result,
the Colombian flora includes some of the world’s most diverse groups of vascular plants, with 51,220
documented species [3-5]. It is hoped that most of this floristic richness is located in the protected
areas that cover 365,120 km2, approximately 32 percent of the territory [6], falling under different
categories of protection, including Natural National Parks, Flora and Fauna Sanctuaries, Natural
National Reserves, Unique Natural Areas, Park Ways and Indigenous Areas, among others. Smaller
forest reserves have also been created to protect river basins for water supply. On the other hand,
destruction of many natural habitats has drastically affected species, often reducing their historical
ranges to a set of small, fragmented populations. Such alteration is predicted to lead to substantial
extinction in the near future [6]. Within the field of conservation biology as a whole, and protected area
management in particular, it is becoming increasingly urgent to develop spatial and temporal
predictions of how significant environment changes, and, particularly, multiple anthropogenic threats,
may affect the abundance and distribution of species [7,8]. Bioclimatic modeling can provide first-cut
estimates of risk of biodiversity loss even where species distribution data are relatively poor [8].
Many conservation biologists have focused their attention on areas presenting high levels of
endemism and diversity, and experiencing a high rate of loss of ecosystems. Such regions
concentrating biodiversity under threat are defined as biodiversity hotspots, representing priorities for
conservation actions [9]. The tropical Andes are considered one of these hotspots, as they support
almost half of the Neotropical biodiversity [10]. However, the application of this concept in the case of
Colombia implies the development of wide studies to investigate the distribution of biodiversity, at an
operational resolution level across the country. Complete inventories are not realistic at that scale, so
other approaches have been taken to exploit incomplete biodiversity data, combining remote sensing
and field sampling/inventories of indicator taxa at different scales [11]. We proposed the use of
Diversity 2010, 2 1160

climatic niche modeling and tested the potential of Passiflora as an indicator of biodiversity in
Colombia, as Passifloraceae represent several interesting traits in terms of diversity, adaptation
and evolution.
Indeed, Colombia is particularly rich in Passifloraceae, with 167 species from Ancistrothyrsus (2),
Dilkea (4) and Passiflora (162) genera, mostly in the Andean region (123 species). The country has 57
endemic species, 95 percent of them Andean, implying a high extinction risk as this region is the most
densely populated and disturbed, particularly the coffee growing zone [12]. According to the Von
Humboldt Institute, the Universidad Nacional de Colombia [13], and Ocampo et al. [12], more than
100 Colombian Passifloraceae species are threatened to some degree, and three species are
considered extinct.
Neotropical Passifloraceae include about 650 species from the genera Ancistrothyrsus, Dilkea,
Mitostemma and Passiflora [14]. The largest one is Passiflora, with ca. 575 species distributed in a
wide range of habitats, from humid rain forests to semi-arid subtropics. Most of them are herbaceous or
woody vines, while a few are trees or shrubs. More than 80 species produce an edible fruit, the most
interesting ones belonging to subgenera Passiflora and Tacsonia [15,16]. Among them, are the yellow
and purple maracuja, P. edulis Sims, with a world production estimated at more than 805,000 tons [17],
and more than 13 species/forms present on the national or local markets of Colombia [12]. Passiflora
species also present ornamental and pharmaceutical interest [16]. Killip’s [18] classification divided
Passiflora into 22 subgenera. It was amended by Escobar [19,20], who merged two subgenera and
proposed a new one, and by MacDougal [21], who revised subgenus Plectostemma, restoring its
ancient name Decaloba. In 2003, Feuillet and MacDougal [22] proposed a deeper revision, recognizing
only four subgenera, Astrophea, Decaloba, Deidamioides and Passiflora. This proposal has been
partially justified by molecular data [23-26], however further studies are still needed for understanding
Passifloraceae diversity and evolution.
As vines, most Passiflora species have adapted to many different habitats, particularly for their
support. They are medium-lived organisms depending on longer-lived trees and shrubs, which makes
them responsive to both medium and long-term changes. They also show high levels of co-evolution
with their herbivores, particularly Heliconius butterflies [27], and some species even exhibit elements
of the carnivory syndrome [28]. They have developed mutualism with protector insects as
nectar-feeding ants [29], and with a wide range of pollinators, including small and large insects, birds
and bats [30,31]. Finally, given its economic importance, the genus Passiflora constitutes an important
genetic resource, and the characterization of wild and cultivated populations is seen as a priority for
Andean countries because of its potential for development and crop diversification [32]. Strategies for
conservation and improvement are needed to optimize the use and conservation of this resource.
Biodiversity data have been traditionally produced through a variety of complementary approaches
using field survey and sampling, museum records, botanical collections, and, in recent times, spatial
analysis of data integrated within Geographical Information Systems (GIS). In each area, the
combination of geological, edaphic, climatic, ecological, historical and anthropic factors produces a
unique range of constraints defining patterns of diversity [33]. GIS allow building maps of species
richness, potential distribution and endemism, prioritizing areas for conservation based on principles
such as complementarity, and assessing the completeness of existing protected areas networks [34].
Diversity 2010, 2 1161

Several methods use climatic variables as the principal drivers of herbarium or collecting data,
generating information for diversity studies and conservation actions [35,36]. Such modeling tools
have been applied to problems of phytogeography [37,38], conservation [39,40], evolutionary
ecology [41], invasive or endemic species management [42-44], potential areas for plant
collection [45,46] and the effect of climate change on crop wild relatives [47]. In Passiflora,
Segura et al. [48] mapped the potential distribution of five species of the subgenus Tacsonia and
produced evidence of intra-specific variation in climatic adaptation along the Andes, from Colombia
to Peru.
The present study was conducted through (1) assessing the geographic distribution of Colombian
Passifloraceae; (2) analyzing it in terms of species richness across the territory; (3) inferring the
potential distribution of each species with predictive distribution models; (4) summing these spatial
predictions to produce a map of potential diversity; and (5) locating collecting gaps by detecting those
areas where Passiflora species are likely to occur but have not yet been collected. Combining these
results permits an analysis of the current status of in situ and ex situ conservation of Passiflora in
Colombia. It also provides elements to evaluate the potential of this group as an indicator for the
detection of biodiversity hotspots and monitoring of conservation/restoration efforts.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Geography and Climate

Colombia is located in the north of South America, between 12°26’46‖ N and 4°13’30‖ S and
between 66°50’54‖ W and 79°02’33‖ W, covering an area of 1,141,748 km2, with altitudes ranging
from the sea level to 5,775 m [1]. It is divided in 32 departments (see Supplementary Figure 1:
Colombia’s geopolitical division in 32 departments and biogeographic division in five regions.).
Figure 1 shows their distribution among the five biogeographic regions of the country [1]. Colombian
climates are tropical, with relatively uniform temperatures throughout the year. Precipitations vary
greatly, with some of the wettest parts of the world in the Pacific lowlands (average annual rainfall
reaching 10,000 mm) contrasting with extremely dry areas in the coast (<500 mm per year), and show a
tendency to increase with altitude.

2.2. Species Distribution and Richness

The original plant dataset consists of the information gathered and georeferenced by
Ocampo et al. [12] from 3,930 individuals of 167 Passifloraceae species, consisting of 3,330 herbarium
specimens (AFP, CAUP, CDMB, CHOCO, COL, COAH, CUVC, FAUC, FMB, HUA, HUQ, JAUM,
K, MA, MEDEL, MO, NY, P, PSO, SURCO, TOLI, VALLE and UIS), 555 field records, and
45 records from Killip [18,49], Uribe [50] and Escobar [19,20,51]. The few specimens from genera
Ancistrothyrsus (three) and Dilkea (four) brought too limited information, as compared to Passiflora,
so they were not taken into account in the analysis presented here.
Diversity 2010, 2 1162

Figure 1. Collection localities (blue dots) of Passiflora specimens used in this study
among 32 Colombian departments and five biogeographic regions (see Supplementary
Figure 1).

Species distribution was plotted on dot-maps using the DIVA-GIS software and quantified by their
maximum distance (MaxD) and circular area (CAr) according to Hijmans et al. [52]. For each species,
Diversity 2010, 2 1163

MaxD is the longest distance between any pair of observations, and CA50 was calculated by assigning a
circle of radius 50 km to each observation and calculating the area covered by all circles. As in a
previous paper [12], we used the following threat criteria: a number of observations under six
characterizes rare species, MaxD under 100 km and CA50 under 20,000 km2 characterize
narrow endemics.
Species richness was calculated as the number of species within a defined area, superimposing
species location maps, using the point-to-grid richness analysis tool in DIVA-GIS with a 0.1 × 0.1°
grid (i.e., 12 × 12 km at the Equator). The circular neighborhood option was applied with a
2°radius [37] to eliminate border effects due to assignation of the grid origin.

2.3. Climatic Adaptation and Modeling

Climatic models were developed to predict species occurrence, with DIVA-GIS. This package uses
WorldClim data [52], consisting of global climate surfaces with a 30‖ grid resolution (i.e., 1 × 1 km at
the Equator), derived from a network of over 12,500 meteorological stations across Latin America,
1,479 of them in Colombia. For each collection site, 19 bioclimatic variables (derived from 12 monthly
means for temperature, rainfall and diurnal temperature range according to Busby [53]) were extracted.
Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed on the resulting dataset, applying a varimax
normalized rotation. For readability, the centroid, i.e., the arithmetic average of the factor scores, was
used to represent each species climatic preferences.
Potential species distributions were mapped by extrapolation, using the 19 bioclimatic variables and
the DIVA-GIS BioClim method for the 80 species with more than 10 observations. BioClim was
chosen because it is a robust methodology, requiring presence-only data [54]. Unfortunately, many of
the omitted 85 native species, too poorly represented for reliable results, are endemic and/or rare
species. Finally, an analysis of complementarity [55] was applied to identify the lowest number of
protected areas needed for the conservation of native Passiflora species.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Distribution of Observations and Species Richness/Diversity

Figure 2 and Table 1 show the distribution of collection/observation points. The Andean region of
Central Colombia is by far the most densely explored, particularly the central coffee growing zone
(Quindío, Caldas and Risaralda; 18.93 to 77.20 observations/1,000 km²) and the three large
departments of Antioquia, Valle del Cauca and Cundinamarca (12.45 to 19.82 observations/1,000 km²).
By comparison, the northeastern Andes (Boyacá, Santander, and Norte de Santander) and the central
department of Tolima appear less well explored (3.59 to 9.39 observations/1000 km²). The situation is
more difficult to appreciate in the southern Andes, as the southern departments of Cauca and Nariño
also belong in good part to the Pacific region. However, they show a collection density only slightly
superior to that of Chocó, which indicates that they have also been less explored than the central Andes.
The situation is heterogeneous in the Caribbean, with only two of its seven departments exhibiting
more than three observations/1,000 km²(excluding the atypical case of the small San Andrés and
Diversity 2010, 2 1164

Providencia islands). Finally, the Amazonian and the Orinoquian are by far the least explored
biogeographic regions of the country, although they cover half of its area.
The mean number of observations per species also reflects variation in exploration among
departments (Table 1), confirming the much denser exploration in the Andes of Antioquia,
Cundinamarca and Valle del Cauca (more than seven observations/species) and in the Pacific region,
while this ratio takes much lower values in the other regions. However, the relation between
exploration density and this indicator is not simple, as the numerous observations in the central coffee
growing zone are distributed among a very wide diversity of species, so the mean number of
observations/species is not as high as could be expected for such densely explored areas.

Figure 2. Species richness observed for Passiflora in 0.1 × 0.1°grid cells in Colombia
(162 species). Points on the map represent sites of collection.
Diversity 2010, 2 1165

Table 1. Number of observations, species, rare and endemic Passiflora species by

Colombian division (see Supplementary Figure 1).
Biogeographic Nb. Total
Area Nb. Total Total species/ Observ./ Rare Endemic
region/ 2 observ./ species/
(km ) observ. Species Log. area species species species
department 1,000 km2 1,000 km2
Andean
Antioquia 62.869 783 12.45 68 1.08 14.171 11.51 28 6
Boyacá 23.012 145 6.30 36 1.56 7.502 4.03 14 1
Caldas 7.291 245 33.60 36 4.94 7.502 6.81 14 1
Cundinamarca 23.942 419 17.50 53 2.21 11.045 7.91 23 0
Huila 18.331 62 3.38 22 1.20 4.585 2.82 18 0
Quindí
o 1.943 150 77.20 38 19.56 7.919 3.95 25 0
Norte de
22.007 79 3.59 36 1.64 7.502 2.19 25 0
Santander
Risaralda 3.592 68 18.93 24 6.68 5.002 2.83 20 0
Santander 30.537 207 6.78 48 1.57 10.003 4.31 31 3
Tolima 22.672 213 9.39 43 1.90 8.961 4.95 27 4
Andean and
Pacific
Cauca 30.985 161 5.20 42 1.36 8.753 3.83 24 1
Nariño 32.046 170 5.30 44 1.40 9.170 3.79 27 0
Valle del Cauca 21.195 420 19.82 56 2.69 11.670 7.38 28 1
Pacific
Chocó 46.530 210 4.51 39 0.84 8.356 5.38 23 1
Caribbean
Atlántico 3.319 18 5.42 7 2.11 1.459 2.57 5 0
Bolí
var 26.469 33 1.25 15 0.57 3.126 2.20 9 1
Cesar 22.213 13 0.59 10 0.45 2.084 1.30 9 0
Córdoba 25.020 33 1.32 9 0.36 1.876 3.67 6 0
La Guajira 20.848 21 1.01 12 0.58 2.501 1.75 9 0
Magdalena 22.742 84 3.69 31 1.36 6.460 2.71 19 1
S. Andrés y
53 4 75.47 2 37.74 0.417 2.00 2 0
Providencia
Sucre 10.917 6 0.55 3 0.27 0.625 2.00 2 0
Orinoquian
Arauca 23.393 10 0.43 6 0.26 1.250 1.67 3 0
Casanare 44.428 4 0.09 4 0.09 0.834 1.00 4 0
Meta 85.286 85 1.00 24 0.28 4.930 3.56 14 0
Vichada 100.242 16 0.16 9 0.09 1.876 1.78 6 0
Amazonian
Amazonas 109.665 85 0.75 16 0.15 3.175 5.31 14 0
Caquetá 91.725 46 0.50 17 0.20 3.425 2.71 13 0
Guainí
a 70.691 16 0.23 10 0.14 2.084 1.60 9 0
Guaviare 55.391 27 0.49 14 0.25 5.418 1.93 11 0
Putumayo 24.885 56 2.25 26 1.04 2.918 2.15 20 0
Vaupés 54.135 34 0.63 19 0.36 4.014 1.79 10 0
Diversity 2010, 2 1166

This variation in exploration of the Colombian territory is partly due to difficulty of access and/or
social conflict. Data are poor and misleading in lowland forests, collections being limited along rivers
in the Orinoquian and Amazonian and rare roads in the Pacific. Social conflict is the prevalent cause in
the less explored Andean departments (Tolima, Santander, Norte de Santander and part of Boyacá) and
in the Caribbean. Conversely, populated areas, particularly around main cities and their universities
(Bogotá, Medellin, Cali, central coffee growing zone), have been densely explored.
However, despite this sampling bias among departments, all observation parameters point to a
concentration of Passiflora collecting in the central Andes and, within these departments, in the coffee
growing zone, a situation explained by both easier access and higher species richness.
Indeed, departments of the Andean region present clearly higher species richness (Table 1). The
only non-Andean department showing a comparable richness is Chocó. In the Andes, Antioquia has by
far the highest number of species (68), followed by Valle del Cauca and Cundinamarca. Concerning
rare species, Santander (northeast) occupies the first place, with 31 species, followed by Valle del
Cauca and Antioquia (28), and Nariño and Tolima (27). Thus, there is little doubt that a more thorough
exploration north of the Eastern Cordillera (Santander) and south of the Central Cordillera (Tolima)
would discover more specimens per species and/or more species. This is even more obvious for the
Amazonian, Orinoquian and Pacific departments, given their poor richness/surface and
observation/species ratios.
When species richness is related to department size, the most diverse area corresponds to the central
coffee growing zone, as this ratio appears to be several times higher in Caldas, Risaralda and Quindío
than in the other Andean departments. A precise comparison with departments of other regions is only
possible if the species are equally sampled, i.e., if the number of observations per species is equivalent.
This is the case for Chocó, Amazonas, and Córdoba, all of them showing a much lower diversity. The
map of observed Passiflora diversity, as produced by the GIS analysis (Figure 2), confirms the
importance of the Andes and the special contribution of the central coffee growing zone.

3.2. Altitudinal Distribution

Ancistrothyrsus and Dilkea reach altitudes of 800 m, mostly in the Amazon [12]. In contrast,
Passiflora is distributed between sea level and 3,700 m. Figure 3 shows a trimodal relationship
between elevation and species diversity for this genus, with maximal values below 500 m and in the
ranges 1,000–1,500 and 2,500–3,000 m. The species number decreases sharply after 3,500 m until the
limit of 4,000 m. To understand better this particular repartition, we have taken into account the
complexity of Passiflora, gathering its Colombian species into five groups defined on morphological
and molecular grounds, and resumed the analysis on these species subsets. This grouping is similar to
the four subgenera proposed by Feuillet and MacDougal [22], except that Killip’s subgenera Rathea
and Tacsonia are maintained as a distinct fifth group, because of their elongated, red or pink flowers
and reduced crown, specifically adapted to pollination by the sword-hummingbird. The four others
correspond to (1) subgenus Astrophea (trees and shrubs), (2) subgenus Decaloba sensu Feuillet and
McDougal (Killip’s subgenera Apodogyne, Decaloba, Murucuja, Porphyropathanthus,
Pseudomurucuja and Psilanthus; mostly species with laminar nectaries, small apetalous flowers, small
fruits, and pollinated by bees and small insects, (3) subgenus Deidamioides sensu Feuillet and
Diversity 2010, 2 1167

MacDougal (Killip’s subgenera Deidamioides and Tryphostemmatoides), and (4) a Passiflora-like

group gathering Killip’s subgenera Calopathanthus, Distephana, Dysosmia, Dysosmioides, Passiflora,
and Manicata, i.e., species with large flowers and fruits, pollinated by large bees or hummingbirds. The
comparison between partial curves shows three distinct patterns in the adaptive potential of these
groups. Astrophea and the Passiflora-like group present a bimodal distribution with a first cohort of
species adapted to lowlands, below 500 m, with 16 and 28 species respectively, a second one adapted
to medium elevations (1,000–2,000 m), and very few species at higher altitudes, with only one record
of P. lindeniana near 2,700 m for subgenus Astrophea, and seven species for the Passiflora-like group.
The opposite is true for the Tacsonia group, showing exclusive adaptation to cool highland climates, as
it is typically concentrated above 2,500 m, with a peak at 2,500–3,000 m. Its fast radiation is clearly the
cause of the third peak of the global curve. Another pattern is that of the Decaloba group, whose range
of adaptation extends from 0 to more than 3,000 m, with no lowland peak and a slight peak around
1,000–1,500 m. The few species of the Deidamioides group also show a quite uniform distribution
from 0 to 3,150 m, mostly in the Pacific and Andean regions. An interrogation remains concerning the
first inflexion of the global curve and those of Astrophea and Passiflora-like groups in the range of
500-1,000 m. Interestingly, Jørgensen [56] reports a bimodal altitudinal distribution of vines in the
Ecuadorian flora, with maximal diversity below 500 m and in the 2,000–3,000 m range, and a maximal
diversity for Passiflora at 2,500–3,000 m. Taking latitudinal variation into account (Tacsonia species
usually show a higher distribution in Ecuador, with a difference of 300–500 m), this corresponds very
well with our observations in Colombia. Considering all Passifloraceae, the variation in number of
Ecuadorian species with altitude [57] follows the same pattern as in Colombia. The Ecuadorian
richness and high endemism level for Tacsonia is another strong point of convergence with the
Colombian situation. According to Jørgensen [56], bimodality in altitudinal vine diversity distribution
might be due to differential collecting intensity. However, there is no reason to expect a more
continuous pattern. Indeed, Kessler [57] showed that there is no common elevational pattern for
diversity, but a wide variety of independent patterns at all taxonomic levels, and that endemism
appeared highest in the narrowest and most fragmented elevational belts: ―The degree to which these
influences become visible along the elevational gradient are determined by which combination of
species is analyzed‖. The same conclusion may be drawn within Passiflora, taking into account
infrageneric divisions. This result restricts the potential use of Passiflora species as an indicator group
to the Andean region, where they have developed most of their diversity.

3.3. Climatic Requirements

The PCA on the 19 climatic variables evidenced a first factor accounting for half of the variation
(49%), strongly correlated with temperature variables (maximum, mean and minimal, but not
seasonality in temperature), and a second one explaining 28 percent of the variation, related with
precipitation in the whole year and in particular seasons (but again, not for their seasonality) (Table 2).
Thus, in the principal plane (Figure 4), the first axis differentiates Andean species adapted to
temperatures below 15 °C (i.e., >2,000 m), on the left side from those growing below 2,000 m, on the
right side. Characteristically, these rightmost species originate from the Amazonian and Orinoquian.
The second axis separates the species according to precipitation. Thus P. arbelaezii, P. costaricensis,
Diversity 2010, 2 1168

P. chocoensis, P. lobata, P. occidentalis, P. pacifica, P. palenquensis and P. tica show preferences for
high precipitation, a predominant condition in the Pacific region, and all are predicted to exist
sympatrically. At the other extreme of the second axis, are species adapted to lower precipitation levels,
specifically to the marked dry season of the Caribbean, such as P. bicornis, P. serrulata,
P. guazumaefolia and P. pallida. Amazonian species take intermediate positions. The species
repartition in the principal plane consistently reflects the potential for climatic adaptation of the groups
that were defined for the analysis of altitudinal distribution. Thus, the Tacsonia group shows adaptation
to cool conditions, while subgenus Astrophea and the Passiflora-like group show higher potential in
hot and mild climates. The Decaloba group shows a much broader adaptation range, explaining its
quite constant presence across the different biogeographic regions.

Figure 3. Distribution of total species richness (within circles) and species relative
diversity in relation to altitude in Colombia, for genus Passiflora and five
infrageneric groups.

3.4. Areas of Distribution and Endemism

Distribution parameters (MaxD and CA50) have been given for each native species in
Ocampo et al. [12]. Figure 5 shows a good correspondence between them, and their comparison
provides information on species dispersion. For instance, a high MaxD and relatively low CA50
indicate low density, resulting from biological rarity and/or under-collection. The species with the
widest distributions in Colombia (more than 1,100 km MaxD) are those showing a wide Neotropical
distribution, such as the common P. foetida, P. auriculata, P. quadrangularis, P. laurifolia,
P. suberosa, P. serratodigitata, P. capsularis, P. rubra, P. misera, and others of still considerable
regional distribution, such as P. vitifolia, P. coccinea, P. spinosa, P. nitida, P. subpeltata,
P. maliformis, P. menispermifolia, and P. biflora. Only P. arborea (Panamá to Ecuador) and
Diversity 2010, 2 1169

P. cumbalensis (Colombia to Peru) show a more restricted distribution. These high-MaxD species are
concentrated at low to medium elevations, the only exception being P. cumbalensis. According to
IUCN [58] criteria, they are not threatened (Least Concern category), except for P. arborea (Near
Threatened; [12]). Between 200 and 1,100 km of MaxD, are species of regional importance, such as
P. mixta, P. ligularis, and endemics with a relatively wide distribution, such as P. sphaerocarpa
(96,244 km²), P. lehmanni (91,156 km²), P. antioquiensis and P. mollis. The latter displays a relatively
high CA50 in its group, as its 17 observations are quite scattered along the Cordillera Occidental. The
position of P. coriacea in this group of medium dispersion is surprising, as it is found in all
Neotropical countries. The 71 species with MaxD values below 225 km include 34 narrow endemics,
21 of which are exclusive to nine departments, particularly Antioquia (six species), Tolima (four) and
Santander (three). The 15 others show similar MaxD and CA50 but live across administrative divisions.
Only four of these 36 narrow endemics are represented by 10 or more observations while 10 are only
known from the type collection. The situation of 33 non-endemic species with a MaxD under 100 km
must be examined in relation to their distribution in neighboring countries. P. truxilliensis, shared with
Venezuela, is a narrow endemic living around the border. The distribution of 14 species extends to
farther places in neighboring countries, and 18 species present a wide distribution, extending to
non-neighboring countries. For example, P. tricuspis is only reported once, in the Andean foothill, so it
has a null MaxD, however its distribution extends south to Bolivia. Sixteen of these 33 species are
adapted to lowland conditions, which suggests that their apparent rarity is in fact due to the poor
collecting in the corresponding regions.

Figure 4. Distribution of Passiflora species centroids in the PCA principal plane for
climatic variables.
Diversity 2010, 2 1170

Figure 5. Passiflora species distributions in Colombia: circular area (CA50) vs. maximum
distance (MaxD).

3.5. Modeling Distributions and Species Assemblages

The predicted distributions of the 80 species with more than 10 observations cannot be presented
here, but are available upon request. Figure 6 presents the potential distribution of richness obtained by
assembling them. The areas of highest predicted richness (41 to 54 predicted sympatric species) are
mostly located in the center of the country, on the slopes of the three cordilleras, between an elevation
of 1,000 and 2,000 m. Despite collection intensity in these areas, the correspondence is not perfect
between observed and modeled distribution. While the species-rich areas of Antioquia, Caldas,
Quindío, Cundinamarca and eastern Boyacá, and even the poorly explored but promising Santander,
are well represented on the map (areas 2, 5, 3, 4 and 1 respectively), only very small richness spots are
drawn for Valle del Cauca (area 7), and none for Cauca and southern Huila. Conversely, predicted
richness spots 6, 8 and 9 (eastern Tolima-northern Huila-southern Cundinamarca, western Caquetá,
Nariño) were not detected in the analysis of observed diversity, suggesting collecting gaps. The model
predicts a poor representation of Passiflora in the lowlands of the Caribbean, Orinoquian and part of
the Pacific, as well as in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, an isolated mountain range on the
Caribbean Coast, reputed for its high level of endemism. In both cases, this may be attributed to the
poor exploration of these areas (low densities of observations) and poor representation of their species
(few observations/per species), resulting in them not having sufficient observations to be used in the
Diversity 2010, 2 1171

predictive modeling. This bias can be corrected by further collecting in these regions. Alternatively,
materials of Colombian species collected in border regions of neighboring countries, belonging to the
same biogeographic entities (e.g., the Venezuelan Llanos for the Orinoquian, Costa Rican and
Ecuadorian Pacific, Brazilian, Ecuadorian and Peruvian Upper Amazonian) might be used to refine
these models and increase the number of observations per species under analysis.

Table 2. Factor loadings, eigenvalues and percentages of variance for the first four
components, resulting from the PCA analysis on 19 bioclimatic parameters for the 3,923
collection points.
Bioclim Parameters Principal components
1 2 3 4
Annual Mean Temperature 0.98 0.17 0.09 −0.03
Mean Monthly Temperature Range 0.08 −0.21 −0.16 −0.96
Isothermality 0.00 0.06 −0.95 −0.01
Temperature Seasonality 0.45 0.03 0.77 −0.18
Max, Temperature of Warmest Month 0.97 0.16 0.12 −0.12
Min, Temperature of Coldest Month 0.98 0.20 0.06 0.04
Temp, Annual Range 0.08 −0.22 0.37 −0.89
Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter 0.98 0.17 0.09 −0.02
Mean Temperature of Driest Quarter 0.98 0.18 0.10 −0.04
Mean Temperature of Warmest Quarter 0.98 0.17 0.11 −0.04
Mean Temperature of Coldest Quarter 0.98 0.17 0.07 −0.03
Annual Precipitation 0.24 0.96 0.04 0.10
Precipitation of Wettest Month 0.29 0.91 0.15 0.10
Precipitation of Driest Month 0.09 0.91 −0.28 0.13
Precipitation Seasonality 0.23 −0.55 0.60 0.00
Precipitation of Wettest Quarter 0.28 0.91 0.17 0.09
Precipitation of Driest Quarter 0.09 0.93 −0.25 0.13
Precipitation of Warmest Quarter 0.10 0.87 −0.20 0.12
Precipitation of Coldest Quarter 0.29 0.89 0.05 0.02
Eigenvalue 9.24 5.35 1.74 1.50
Percentage of variance 48.71 28.28 9.13 7.95

3.6. Conservation of Passiflora species and their Habitat

The biodiversity hotspot concept not only considers diversity but also endemism. Analyzing the
distributions of New Zealand ferns, Mexican gymnosperms, or European butterflies, Lehmann
et al. [36], Contreras-Medina and Luna-Vega [59], and Werner and Buszko [60] observed a poor
correlation between both parameters. At the genus level, Jaramillo [61] found some correspondence
between them for Piper diversity in the Chocó region, however there was a negative correlation
between phylogenetic diversity and the proportion of endemics. For Passiflora in Colombia, we could
not establish rigorously their correspondence, as the analysis was not designed for rare species,
however we compared their spatial repartition, distinguishing four categories among the 56 endemics:
those with a relatively wide distribution (MaxD > 100 km, 19 species), the narrow endemics
Diversity 2010, 2 1172

(11 species), the rare endemics (three species), and the rare narrow endemics (23 species). Six of the 11
narrow endemics, seven of the 23 rare narrow endemics, and none of the three rare endemics live in
one of the areas defined by our analysis. Indeed, seven endemics are adapted to lowlands, and two
belong to the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, an area of endemism not sufficiently taken into account
for reasons explained previously. In any case, of the 37 living Andean rare/narrow endemics, only 13
live in one of the ―hotspots‖. This proportion must be compared with more than 54 sympatric species
out of 80 non-rare species whose distribution determined those hotspots. Thus, preserving these nine
areas should have a less positive impact on the conservation of narrow endemics than on the general
Passiflora diversity, which appears to limit the application of the biodiversity hotspot concept.
According to the analysis of complementarity for reserve selection, 52 sites of 25 × 25 km would
suffice to represent all 162 native species throughout the country. The best five sites, in Caldas,
Risaralda, Norte de Santander, southern Antioquia and Boyacá, capture a total 64 species. In just seven
sites, 50 percent of all species could be conserved, though many of the endemic/rare species are not
captured in these sites.
Figure 6 also shows a general lack of correspondence between the estimated distribution of
Passiflora diversity and that of protected areas in the Colombian Andes, concentrated around the
summits, obviously targeting páramo ecosystems. Very few small protected areas harbor a high
Passiflora diversity: the watershed forest reserves of Sierra del Peligro (Boyacá, 16.5 km²), Río Nare
(Antioquia, 118.8 km²), Río San Francisco, Cuchillas Peñas Blancas, and Cerro Quininí
(Cundinamarca, 28.8, 16.3 and 18.0 km²). The Parque Nacional Farallones (Valle del Cauca) is the
only reserve of national importance to protect part of a small Passiflora hotspot, on its eastern fringes.
This poor coverage is not good news, neither for a genus including 71 percent threatened species, nor
for the habitats where these species have developed numerous interactions with many other organisms.
Figure 7 shows a striking general superposition of areas of high Passiflora diversity on certain
coffee growing zone ecotopes [62] whose conservation is of the utmost importance for Colombia. This
is not surprising, as the corresponding elevation belts include or enclose those of major diversity.
Clearly, efforts for the conservation of Passiflora habitats and genetic resources must be integrated in
the more general management of the coffee growing zone environment at the landscape level.
Diversity 2010, 2 1173

Figure 6. Modeled distribution of Colombian Passiflora species diversity based on data

from 80 species presenting more than 10 observations. Ellipses individualize high richness
spots mentioned in the text. Distribution of protected areas in Colombia, showing poor
correspondence with areas of high Passiflora diversity.
Diversity 2010, 2 1174

Figure 7. Correspondence between Passiflora species high richness spots and coffee
growing zone ecotopes.

3.7. Passiflora as Indicators of Biodiversity

According to Pearson [34], an ideal indicator taxon should cumulate seven criteria: (i) a well-known
and stable taxonomy, (ii) well-known natural history, (iii) readily surveyed and manipulated,
(iv) higher taxa broadly distributed geographically and over a breadth of habitats, (v) lower taxa
Diversity 2010, 2 1175

specialized and sensitive to habitat changes, (vi) patterns of diversity reflected in other taxa, and
(vii) potential economic importance. Passiflora clearly fills the fifth and seventh criteria, though we
must keep in mind that several common species are indicators of more or less disturbed habitats.
Concerning the fourth criterion, our analyses have repeatedly underlined that Colombian Passiflora
species distribution is concentrated in the Andean region, so their use as indicators should be restricted
to the corresponding elevation belts. Lianas growing in high trees are not always easily surveyed (third
criterion), however their typical structures, showy flowers and interesting fruits make them easy to
identify as a group, catching the attention of local populations and specialists, who can thus help
localize the different species in particular places. The application of molecular techniques should
produce important progress in the complex taxonomy of this group and further, in understanding its
natural history. The sixth criterion is particularly important. The numerous interactions of Passiflora
species with other organisms (surrounding vegetation, pollinators, and herbivores) constitute a first
indication that their diversity is necessarily related to that of other ecosystem components. Another
indication came from a preliminary study, where we found an excellent correspondence between the
distributions of diversity of Passiflora and Vasconcellea (mountain papayas), another plant group
whose diversification is clearly related to the rise of the Andes [38]. Similar results must be obtained
with more plant taxa before considering unequivocally Passiflora as a reliable surrogate for floral
diversity in Andean ecosystems. However, given the excellent correspondence between Passiflora
diversity maps and coffee growing zone ecotope maps, we may already recommend them as useful
indicators of habitat degradation or of restoration in this environmentally and economically very
important region. They could complement other indicators working at the landscape level, such as
birds, whereas insect diversity indicators work better at a smaller scale [63].

4. Conclusions

Collections of Passiflora have not been uniform as a consequence of difficulty of access and/or
chronic social conflict in many areas. They have been much denser in the central coffee growing zone,
Antioquia, Valle del Cauca and Cundinamarca. The southern and northeastern Andes, and the
Caribbean have been little explored. For the lowland forests of the Pacific, the Orinoquian and the
Amazonian, data are so poor that they are misleading. Despite the resulting sampling bias, collecting
parameters clearly point to the concentration of observed Passiflora diversity in the Andes, and more
particularly the central coffee growing zone.
The modeled species richness map allowed identifying nine richness spots of variable size, three of
which, located in the southern and southeastern Andes of Colombia, correspond to collection gaps, as
they were not detected in the analysis of observed diversity. Another probable collection gap, not
detected by diversity modeling, corresponds to the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, an isolated mountain
range with both high diversity and endemism. The proportion of endemics living in high richness spots
is lower than the proportion of all species used for modeling, confirming the lack of relation between
diversity concentration and endemism reported in other studies. If this is further substantiated in
different groups of organisms, it could limit the application of the biodiversity hotspot concept, as the
best-protected areas for diversity would not necessarily provide protection to a high proportion of
narrow endemics.
Diversity 2010, 2 1176

Passiflora diversity is not conserved by the current network of Colombian protected areas. On the
contrary, it is particularly concentrated on certain ecotopes of the coffee growing zone, i.e., highly
disturbed habitats, so any conservation effort must be integrated in local management strategies at the
landscape level. Passiflora may provide an interesting indicator to evaluate the outcome of such efforts.

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ginés-Mera Fellowship
Foundation (CIAT-IDRC). Part of this research has been funded by the Colombian Ministry for
Environment and the Research Center of the Colombian Coffee Grower Federation (Cenicafé) through
the collaborative project ―Estudio de la Diversidad de las Passifloraceae y Caricaceae en la zona
cafetera de Colombia‖.

References

1. Hernández, J.; Hurtado, A.; Ortiz, R.; Walschuburger, T. Unidades biogeográficas de Colombia.
In Estado de la biodiversidad en Colombia; Hernández, J., Ortiz, R., Walschuburger, T., Hurtado.,
Eds.; Colciencias: Bogotá, Colombia, 1991; pp. 15-17.
2. Gentry, A.H. Endemism in tropical versus temperate plant communities. In Conservation Biology;
Soulé, M.E., Ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 153-181.
3. MacNeely, J.A.; Miller, K.R.; Reid, N.A.; Mittemer, R.A; Wainer, T.B. Conserving the World’s
Biological Diversity; International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources,
World Resources Institute, Conservation International, WWF and World Banks: Washington, DC,
USA, 1990; p. 174.
4. May, R.M. How many species inhabit the Earth? Sci. Amer. 1992, 267, 18-24.
5. Groombridge, B.; Jenkins, M.D. World Atlas of Biodiversity, Earth’s Living Resources in the 21st
Century; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2002; p. 340.
6. Villegas, B.; Sesana, L.; Hurtado-García, A.; Nieto, F. Parques Naturales Nacionales de
Colombia; Villegas Editores., Eds.; Villegas Editores—Parques Nacionales—Instituto de
Investigaciones Biológicas Alexander Von Humboldt: Bogotá, Colombia, 2006; p. 448.
7. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. The Global 2000: A representative approach to conserving the earth’s
most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 502-515.
8. Midgley, G.F.; Hannah, L.; Millar, D.; Rutherford, M.C.; Powrie, L.W. Assessing the
vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global
Ecol. Biogeog. 2002, 11, 445-451.
9. Myers, N.; Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kent, J. Biodiversity
hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403, 853-858.
10. Word Wildlife Fund (WWW). Biodiversity Vision for the Northern Andes Ecoregional Complex;
S. Palminteri: Santiago de Cali, Colombia, 2001; pp. 1-88.
Diversity 2010, 2 1177

11. Villareal, H.; Álvarez, M.; Córdoba, S.; Escobar, F.; Fagua, G.; Gast, F.; Mendoza, H.; Ospina, M.;
Umaña, A.M. Manual de métodos para el desarrollo de inventarios de biodiversidad, Programa
de Inventarios de Biodiversidad, 2nd ed.; Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos
Alexander von Humboldt: Bogotá, Colombia, 2006; p. 210.
12. Ocampo, J.; Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge, G.; Restrepo, M.; Jarvis, A.; Salazar, M.; Caetano, C.
Diversity of Colombian Passifloraceae: biogeography and an updated list for conservation. Biota
Colombiana 2007, 8, 1-45.
13. Hernández, A.; Garcia, N. Las Pasifloras. In Libro rojo de las plantas de Colombia: Las
bromelias, las labiadas, y las pasifloras; Garcia, N., Galeano, G., Eds.; Instituto Alexander von
Humboldt—Instituto de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Bogotá,
Colombia, 2006; pp. 583-567.
14. Ulmer, T.; MacDougal, J. Passiflora, Passionflowers of the World, 1st ed.; Timber Press: Portland,
OR, USA, 2004; p. 430.
15. Martin, F.W.; Nakasone, H.Y. The edible species of Passiflora. Econ. Bot. 1970, 24, 333-343.
16. Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge, G.; Segura, S.D.; Hodson De Jaramillo, E.; Góngora., G.A. Passion
Fruits. In Tropical Plant Breeding; Charrier, A., Jacquot, M., Hamon, S., Nicolas, D., Eds.;
Enfield Sciences: Montpellier, France, 2001; pp. 381-401.
17. Passion fruit. Supply and demand. In iTi tropicals Inc., 2010. Available online:
[Link] (accessed on 26 July 2010).
18. Killip, E.P. The American Species of Passifloraceae; Botanical Series 19; Field Museum of
Natural History Publication: Chicago, IL, USA, 1938; p. 613.
19. Escobar, L.K. Passifloraceae, Flora de Colombia 10; Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad
Nacional de Colombia: Bogotá, Colombia, 1988; p. 143.
20. Escobar, L.K. A new subgenus and five new species in Passiflora (Passifloraceae) from South
America. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1989, 76, 877-885.
21. MacDougal, J.M. Revision of Passiflora section Decaloba, Pseudodysosmia (Passifloraceae). Syst.
Bot. Monogr. 1994, 14, 146.
22. Feuillet, C.; MacDougal, J. A new infrageneric classification of Passiflora L. (Passifloraceae).
Passiflora 2003, 13, 34-38.
23. Muschner, V.; Lorenz-Lemke, A.; Cervi, A.C.; Bonatto, S.; Souza-Chies, T.; Salzano, F.; Freitas,
L. A first molecular phylogenetic analysis of Passiflora (Passifloraceae). Am. J. Bot. 2003, 90,
1229-1238.
24. Yockteng, R.; Nadot, S. Phylogenetic relationships among Passiflora species based on the
glutamine synthetase nuclear gene expressed in chloroplast (ncpGS). Mol. Phyl. Evol. 2004, 31,
379-396.
25. Hansen, A. K.; Lawrence, G.; Simpson, B.B.; Downie, S.R.; Stephen, S.; Cervi, A.C.; Jansen, R.K.
Phylogenetic relationships and chromosome number evolution in Passiflora. Syst. Bot. 2006, 31,
138-150.
26. Ocampo, J. Study of the Diversity of Genus Passiflora L. (Passifloraceae) and its Distribution in
Colombia; Ph.D. Dissertation, Sciences Agronomiques; Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique:
de Montpellier, France, 2007; p. 268.
Diversity 2010, 2 1178

27. Gilbert, L.E. The evolution of a butterfly and a vine, Heliconious butterflies. Sci. Am. 1982, 247,
10-121.
28. Radhamani, T.R.; Sudarshana, L.; Krishnan, R. Defence and carnivory: dual roles of bracts in
Passiflora foetida L. J. Biosci. 1995, 20, 657-664.
29. Apple, J.; Feener, D. Ant visitation of extrafloral nectaries of Passiflora: the effects of nectary
attributes and ant behavior on patterns in facultative ant-plant mutualisms. Oecologia 2001, 127,
409-416.
30. Büchert, A.; Mogens, J. The fragility of extreme specialization: Passiflora mixta and its
pollinating hummingbird Ensifera ensifera. J. Trop. Ecol. 2001, 17, 323-329.
31. Sazima, M.; Sazima, I. Bat pollination of the passion flower, Passiflora mucronata, in
southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 1978, 10, 100-109.
32. Debouck, D.G.; Libreros-Ferla, D. Neotropical montane forests: a fragile home of genetic
resources of wild relatives of New World crops. In Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical
Montane Forests, Proceedings of a Symposium, Biodiversity and Conservation of Neotropical
Montane Forests, Proceedings of a Symposium, New York Botanical Garden, New York, NY,
USA, 21–26 June 1993; Churchill, S.P., Balslev, H., Forero, E., Luteyn, J.L., Eds.; pp. 561-577.
33. Maxted, N.; van Slageren, M.W.; Rihan, J.R. Ecogeographic surveys. In Collecting Plant Genetic
Diversity, Technical Guidelines; Guarino, L., Ramanatha Rao, V., Reid, R., Eds.; CAB
International: Wallingford, Australia, 1995; pp. 255-286.
34. Pearson, D.L. Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Phil. Trans.
Roy. Soc. Lond. 1994, 345, 75-79.
35. Skov, F. Potential plant distribution mapping based on climatic similarity. Taxon 2000, 49,
503-515.
36. Lehmann, A.; Leathwick, J.R.; Overton, J.M. Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial
predictions of species assemblages. Biodivers. Conserv. 2002, 11, 2217-2238.
37. Hijmans R.J.; Spooner, D.M. Geography of wild potato species. Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88, 2101-2112.
38. Scheldeman, X.; Willemen, L.; Coppens d'Eeckenbrugge, G.; Romeijn-Peeters, E.; Restrepo, M.T.;
Romero Motoche, J.; Jiménez, D.; Lobo, M.; Medina, C.I.; Reyes, C.; Rodrí guez, D.; Ocampo,
J.A.; Van Damme, P.; Goetgebeur, P. Distribution, diversity and crop ecology of highland papayas
(Vasconcellea spp.) and papaya (Carica papaya L.) in Latin America. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006,
16, 1867-1884.
39. Jarvis, A.; Ferguson, M.E.; Williams, D.E.; Guarino, L.; Jones, P.G.; Stalker, H.T.; Valls, J.F.M.;
Pittman, R.N.; Simpson, C.E.; Bramel, P. Biogeography of wild Arachis: assessing conservation
status and setting future priorities. Crop Sci. 2003, 43, 1100-1108.
40. Kingston, N.; Waldren, S. A conservation appraisal of the rare and endemic vascular plants of
Pitcairn Island. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 781-800.
41. Zaharieva, M.; Prosperi, J.M.; Monneveux, P. Ecological distribution and species diversity of
Aegilops L. genus in Bulgaria. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13, 2319-2337.
42. Peterson, A.T. Predictability of the geography of species invasions via ecological niche modeling.
Quart. Rev. Biol. 2001, 78, 419-433.
Diversity 2010, 2 1179

43. Peterson, A.T.; Robins, C.R. When endangered meets invasive: ecological niche modeling
predicts double trouble for spotted owls, Strix occidentalis. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17, 1161-1165.
44. Leimberck, R.; Valencia, R.; Balslev, H. Landscape diversity patterns and endemism of Araceae in
Ecuador. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13, 1755-1779.
45. Peterson, A.T. Predicting species geographic distribution based on ecological niche modeling.
Condor 2001, 10, 599-605.
46. Rodrí guez, D.; Marín, C.; Quecán, H.; Ortiz, R. Áreas potenciales para colectas del género
Vasconcellea Badillo en Venezuela. Bioagro 2005, 17, 3-10.
47. Jarvis, A.; Lane, A.; Hijmans, R.J. The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agricult.,
Ecosyst. Environm. 2008, 126, 13-23.
48. Segura, S.; Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge, G.; López, L.; Grum, M.; Guarino, L. Mapping the potential
distribution of five species of Passiflora in Andean countries. Gen. Res. [Link]. 2003, 50,
555-566.
49. Killip, E.P. Supplemental Notes on the American Species of Passifloraceae with Descriptions of
New Species; Bulletin of the United States National Museum—Herbarium, Volume 35, Part 1;
Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 1960; p. 29.
50. Uribe, L. Pasifloráceas y Begoniáceas de la Real Expedición Botánica del Nuevo Reino de
Granada; Ediciones Cultura Hispánica 26: Madrid, España, 1955; pp. 98.
51. Escobar, L.K. Two new species and a key to Passiflora subg. Astrophea. Syst. Bot. 1994, 19,
203-210.
52. Hijmans, R.J.; Schreuder, M., De la Cruz, M.; Rojas, E. Computer tools for spatial analysis of
plant genetic resources data: DIVA-GIS. Pl. Gen. Res. Newsl. 2001, 27, 15-19.
53. Busby, J.R. BIOCLIM - A bioclimate prediction system. In Nature Conservation: Cost Effective
Biological Surveys and Data Analysis; Margules, C.R., Austin, M.P., Eds.; CSIRO: Melbourne,
Australia, 1991; pp. 4-68.
54. Hijmans, R.J.; Graham, C.H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of
climate change on species distributions. Glob. Chan. Biol. 2006, 12, 2272-2281.
55. Rebelo, A.G.R. Iterative selection procedures: centers of endemism and optimal placement of
reserves. Strelitzia 1994, 1, 231-257.
56. Jørgensen, P.M. Passifloraceae. In Catalogue of the Vascular Plants of Ecuador; Monographs in
Systematic Botany 75; Jørgensen, P.M., León-Yánez, S., Eds.; Missouri Botanical Garden: St.
Louis, MO, USA, 1999; pp. 779-783.
57. Kessler, M. The elevational gradient of Andean plant endemism: varying influences of
taxon-specific traits and topography at different taxonomic levels. J. Biogeogr. 2002, 29,
1159-1165.
58. IUCN. Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0;
IUCN Species Survival Commission; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 2003; p. 26.
59. Contreras-Medina, R.; Luna-Vega, I. Species richness, endemism and conservation of Mexican
gymnosperms. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16, 1803-1821.
60. Werner, U.; Buszko, J. Detecting diversity hot spots using species-area and endemics-area
relationships: the case of butterflies. Biodiv. Conser. 2005, 14, 1977-1988.
Diversity 2010, 2 1180

61. Jaramillo, M.A. Using Piper species diversity to identify conservation priorities in the Chocó
Region of Colombia. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15, 1695-1712.
62. Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia. El Café. In Atlas de Colombia, 5a ed.; Instituto
Agustín Codazzi: Bogotá, Colombia, 2003; p. 252.
63. Perfecto, I.; Mas, A.; Dietsch, T.; Vandermeer, J. Conservation of biodiversity in coffee
agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12,
1239-1252.

© 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
([Link]