0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 565 views11 pagesOblicon Syllabus Uribe 2019
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
- Syllabus Overview: Provides a general overview of the Obligations & Contracts course, including course details, description, and objectives.
- Obligations: Detailed discussions on obligations, including their nature, breach, and extinguishment with related legal articles and case references.
- Contracts: Covers the essentials of contracts, including principles, classifications, stages, and forms, supported by authoritative legal cases.
Syllabus
8 January 2019
Oblicon Syllabus
: OBLIGATIONS & CONTRACTS
Five (5) units,
None
Sales, Lease, Agency, Partnership & Trust, Credit
Transactions
Type of Course Major Subject
Faculty Alt Cristom A, Uribe
Course Description ;
Obligations and Contracts basically is covered by Book IV, Titles I and Il ofthe Civil
Code of the Philippines. It deals with the nature, sources and kinds of
Arts. 1350-1355
4. Delivery ect
5. Due observance of prescribed formalities
Clemente x. CA, Jalandoon. GR No. 175483, October 14, 2015
‘entacapital Investrzent Corp. vs. Mahi
One Te samtesmset Cop inay, [Link]. 171736 July 5, 2010
Weldon v. CA, 154 SCRA 618
C&C Commercial Corp. v Menor, 120 SCRA 112
Tang v. CA, 90 SCRA 236
Carifio [Link], 152 SCRA 529
Lagunzad v. Gonzales, 92 SCRA 476
Law v. Olympic Sawmill, 129 SCRA 439
Form of Contracts ~ Arts. 1356-1358
1. any form — oral
2. special form
a. validity — Arts. 748, 749, 1744, 1773, 1874, 1956, 2134,
Act 1147, Sec. 22
b. enforceability — Arts, 1403, 1878
©. greater efficacy or convenience ~ Arts, 1358
Lao Sok v. Sabaysabay, 138 SCRA 134
Gallardo v. IAC, 155 SCRA 248
Paredes v. Espino, 22 SCRA 1000
Sps. Aguinaldo v. TORRES. G.R. No. 225808, 11 September 2017
Reformation of Contracts ~ Arts. 1359-1369
Interpretation of Contracts ~ Arts. 1370-1379.
Lim v. CA, 99 SCRA 668
Republic v. Castellvi, 58 SERA 336 :
Eastern Shipping v. Margarina-Verkaufs-Union, 93 SCRA 256
Kinds of Contracts as to Validity
Valid and bin
Valid but defective
Nae scissble Contracts ~ Arts, 1380-1389, 1191 7
= Arts, 1390-1402, 1327-1328, 1330
1408, 1317, 1878
11318, 1353, 1378, 1491,
iii)
Void or Inexistent ~ Arts, 1409-14:
1898,/. Sador
Hongkong & Shang oe Pal, 161 SCRA 634
Voidable Contracts
Felipe V. Heirs of Aldon, 120 SCRA 628
ponte ne [Link], 151 SCRA 703
lunden v. Union Bank, G.R. No. 205838, 29 November 2017
Unenforceable Contracts
Ortega v. Leonardo, 103 Phil $70
Carbonel v. Poncio, 103 Phil 635
Babao v. Perez, 102 Phil 756
Cabague v. Auxilio, 32 Phil 294
Yuvienco v. Dacuycuy, 104 SCRA 668
Clarin v. Rulona, 127 SCRA 512
Bisaya Land Transportation v. Sanchez, 153 SCRA 532
Void or Inexistent
‘Clemente v. CA, Jalandoon, GR No. 175483, October 14, 2015
Hernandez v. CA, 160 SCRA 821
Rubias v. Batiller, $1 SCRA 120
Javier v. vda. De Cruz, 80 SCRA 343
Menil [Link], 84 SCRA 413
Director of Lands v. Alba, 88 SCRA 513
Tongoy v. CA, 123 SCRA 99
Lita Enterprises v. IAC, 129 SCRA 79
Arsenal v. IAC, 143 SCRA 40
Manotok Realty v. IAC, 149 SCRA 372
Portugal v. IAC, 159 SCRA 178
Yanas v. Acaylar, 136 SCRA 52
Barsobia v. Cuenco, 113 SCRA 547
Godinez v. Fong, 120 SCRA 223
Yap v. Grageda, 121 SCRA 244
Pineda v. de la Rama, 12] SCRA 671
Liguez [Link], 192 Phil 577
Philbanking v. Lai She, 21 SCRA 52
Avila v. CA, 145 SCRA 541
Teja Marketing v. IAC, 148 SCRA 347
Briones [Link], 41 SCRA 404Prescribed Textbooks:
Arturo M, Tolentino, Commentaries & Jurisprudence on the Civil Code of the
Philippines, Vol. 4, Central LawBook Pub., 1987
Balane, Ruben F, Jottings and Jurisprudence in Civil Law (Obligations and Contracts),
Central Book Supply, 2018 Edition
References:
1, Melencio S. Sta, Maria, Obligations and Contracts, Texts and Cases, Rex Book.
Store., 2003
2. D.P. Jurado, Comments & Jurisprudence on Obligations and Contracts, Rex
Bookstore, Twelfth Revised Edition 2009
Teaching Methods/Strategies
A question-and-answer format will basically be employed to determine whether the
student read and understood the provisions of the law and the decisions of the Supreme
Court. Quizzes will also be administered to check knowledge, understanding and the
analyzing skills of the students, Lectures, group discussions and visual aids may be used
when applicable.
Grading Criteria:
MidTerm Exam 20%
Recitation & Quizzes 30%
Final Exam 50%