0% found this document useful (0 votes)
355 views1 page

Team Video Presentation Rubric

The rubric evaluates team video presentations on quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. It assesses these criteria on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (3 points) to good (5 points). An effective presentation will accurately portray the chapter content, provide a realistic and well-developed scenario incorporating course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the audience in a way that is helpful for students, and have all presenters speak confidently and with appropriate delivery.

Uploaded by

Love Joey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
355 views1 page

Team Video Presentation Rubric

The rubric evaluates team video presentations on quality of content, quality of scenario, organization, impact, and presentation skills. It assesses these criteria on a scale from poor (1 point) to fair (3 points) to good (5 points). An effective presentation will accurately portray the chapter content, provide a realistic and well-developed scenario incorporating course concepts, be well-organized with smooth transitions, fully engage the audience in a way that is helpful for students, and have all presenters speak confidently and with appropriate delivery.

Uploaded by

Love Joey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Rubric for Team/Video Presentation: This section provides a rubric with criteria and scoring for assessing the quality of team or video presentations, focusing on content, organization, and impact.

Rubric for Team/Video Presentation

Group No. / Name:


Group Members:

Criteria Poor - 1pt Fair - 3pts Good - 5pts


Quality of Chapter content is not Chapter content is accurately Chapter content is accurately
Content accurately portrayed. portrayed as either effective or portrayed as either effective or
8 pts ineffective. ineffective.
Incomplete coverage of the
topic. A student who wanted Adequate coverage of the topic. Complete coverage of the topic.
to develop this skill would not A student would need to do A student could develop
find this presentation to be more research to develop this multiple aspects of the skill with
effective. skill. this resource.
Score:
Quality of Scenario was not realistic, Scenario was realistic and class- Scenario was realistic, class-
Scenario inappropriate for class, or appropriate, appropriate, well-developed.
4 pts poorly developed.
Course concepts could be Scenario clearly incorporated
Scenario failed to incorporate identified. course concepts.
course concepts.
Score:
Organization Presentation was not well- Presentation was fairly well- Presentation was well-
2 pts organized. organized. organized.

The transitions were poor. The transitions flowed smoothly The transitions flowed
at most times. smoothly.
Score:
Impact Presentation failed to engage Presentation engaged the Presentation fully engaged the
3 pts the audience. audience. audience.

Presentation would not be Presentation may provide some Presentation would be helpful
helpful to students. helpful information. to students in developing skills.

Presentation would be difficult Students who follow the advice Presentation would be easy for
for students to use. in the presentation could students to learn from.
develop skills with additional
research. Students who follow the advice
in this presentation would be
effective.
Score:
Presentation None of the presenters spoke Most presenters spoke with All presenters spoke with
Skills with appropriate volume, appropriate volume, tone, and appropriate volume, tone, and
3 pts tone, and use of pauses. use of pauses. use of pauses.

None of the presenters Most presenters were well- All presenters were well-
appeared prepared or prepared and spoke with prepared and spoke with
confident. confidence. confidence.
Score:

Total Score:

Instructor / Student’s Signature:

You might also like