As 1530.4-2005 PDF
As 1530.4-2005 PDF
4—2005
AS 1530.4—2005
Australian Standard™
Additional Interests:
Australian Standard™
COPYRIGHT
© Standards Australia
All rights are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by
any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the written
permission of the publisher.
Published by Standards Australia GPO Box 476, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia
ISBN 0 7337 6866 0
AS 1530.4—2005 2
PREFACE
General
This Standard was prepared by the Joint Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand
Committee FP-018, Fire Tests on Building Components, Materials and Structures, to
supersede AS 1530.4—1997.
After consultation with stakeholders in both countries, Standards Australia and Standards
New Zealand decided to develop this Standard as an Australian Standard rather than an
Australian/New Zealand Standard.
Development and International Standards
This Standard follows the general principles and procedures contained in the ISO 834
series, Fire-resistance test—Elements of building construction, of Standards and other
related ISO documents but has consolidated them in one document, in line with previous
editions of AS 1530.4. Reference was also made to relevant European Standards, as
appropriate.
The development process for this revision was to consider the relevant ISO Standards and
adopt the ISO requirements unless there was a sound technical basis for retaining and/or
providing different requirements, that is, the ISO requirements were not consistent with
Australian Building design and construction practices or the changes would impose a
substantial cost on industry without an appreciable gain.
It is the intention of the Committee to participate in the ISO TC92 process and propose
changes to ISO 834 and related Standards such that full adoption of ISO 834 can be
proposed during the next review of AS 1530.4.
Variations to ISO 834
Typical examples of significant variations from ISO requirements include the following:
(a) The retention of the specification for furnace thermocouples from the previous edition
with an option to use the plate thermocouple prescribed in ISO 834-1:1999. The use
of the plate thermocouple is described in Appendix B. The use of the plate
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
thermocouple was not adopted in full because of concerns about the durability of the
design and the disruption this would cause to industry with little apparent advantage.
These issues are being debated internationally. The impact of the plate thermocouple
is to reduce the performance of some forms of construction. This would lead to
increases in construction cost. The non-mandatory option of including plate
thermocouples in tests enables manufacturers to generate data for international
markets whilst causing minimum disruption to the Australian industry.
(b) The retention of duct test methods based on earlier versions of AS 1530.4 because the
ISO 6944 Fire resistance tests: Ventilation ducts Standard is not applicable to many
Australian applications.
(c) The retention of thermocouple positions for structurally critical temperatures and test
procedures for structural elements to maintain compatibility with design Standards.
(d) The inclusion of test methods for critical services and alternate test methods in the
Appendix that relate to BCA applications that are not addressed in ISO Standards.
(e) Test methods and standard configurations for service penetrations, test methods for
control joints and some failure criteria for doorsets have been retained to be
consistent with Australian construction practices, other standards and materials of
construction.
3 AS 1530.4—2005
This Standard references documents in clauses of both a normative and informative nature.
Normative referenced documents, are listed in Clause 1.5 and a complete list of both
normative and informative referenced documents are provided in Appendix H.
Normative and informative
The terms ‘normative’ and ‘informative’ have been used in this Standard to define the
application of the appendix to which they apply. A ‘normative’ appendix is an integral part
of the Standard, whereas an ‘informative’ appendix is only for information and guidance.
Notes and commentaries
The use of Notes in this Standard is of an advisory nature only. They provide explanations
and guidance on recommended design consideration or technical procedures, as well as an
informative cross-reference to other documents or publications.
CONTENTS
Page
Page
4.10 TEST RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 67
4.11 PERMISSIBLE VARIATION TO THE TESTED SPECIMEN ................................. 67
4.12 TEST REPORT ......................................................................................................... 68
SECTION 5 COLUMNS
5.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 69
5.2 TEST SPECIMEN SIZE ............................................................................................ 69
5.3 INSTRUMENTATION ............................................................................................. 69
5.4 LOADING AND RESTRAINT ................................................................................. 69
5.5 TEST PROCEDURE ................................................................................................ 70
5.6 OBSERVATIONS ..................................................................................................... 70
5.7 CRITERIA OF FAILURE ........................................................................................ 70
5.8 DETERMINATION OF FIRE RESISTANCE........................................................... 70
5.9 PERMISSIBLE VARIATIONS TO THE TESTED SPECIMEN............................... 70
Page
9.7 TEST REPORT ......................................................................................................... 92
9.8 PERMISSIBLE VARIATIONS TO THE TESTED SPECIMEN............................... 92
APPENDICES
A RADIANT HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENTS ........................................................ 128
B ALTERNATIVE AND ADDITIONAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR ELEMENTS
OF CONSTRUCTION............................................................................................. 132
C GUIDELINES FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF SPECIMEN THERMOCOUPLES 144
D ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS CABLES........................................... 147
E TEST PROGRAM FOR SEALING SYSTEMS PROTECTING METAL
PIPE PENETRATIONS........................................................................................... 150
F FIRE-RESISTANT DOORSETS............................................................................. 151
G REVIEW OF AS 1530.4.......................................................................................... 152
STANDARDS AUSTRALIA
Australian Standard
Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures
1.1 SCOPE
This Standard provides methods for determining the fire resistance of various elements of
construction when subjected to standard fire exposure conditions.
NOTES:
1 Radiant heat measurements are given in Appendix A.
2 Alternative heating and radiation exposure conditions, which may be used for evaluation of
alternative solutions, voluntary upgrades and other applications where the standard heating
regime may not be applicable, and additional procedures to meet special requirements are
given in Appendix B.
3 Unless one of the alternative heating regimes is specifically required, the standard time
temperature curve applies (see Figure 2.10.1).
4 AS 1720.4, AS 3600, AS 3700 and AS 4100 may also be used to determine the fire resistance
of an element of construction.
5 The assessment of smoke production and smoke spread when testing specimens is outside the
scope of this Standard. Significant smoke spread or smoke production can occur even though
an element of construction may have achieved high FRLs. Other test methods, such as
AS 1530.7, may be considered when evaluating the potential for smoke spread.
1.2 OBJECTIVE
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
1.3 PRINCIPLE
A representative specimen of an element of construction is exposed to heat under controlled
conditions in a furnace, which is operated to satisfy a specified time-temperature curve.
Where it is not possible to model the element or system of construction satisfactorily with
one specimen, it may be necessary to test more than one specimen. Observations are made
on the performance of the specimen while it is subjected to thermal and, where applicable,
physical loading. The elapsed times at which various failures occur are recorded.
NOTE: Where a specimen has been tested under a particular set of test conditions, an identical
specimen should not be resubmitted for test without modification unless the test is carried out for
surveillance on similar purposes to confirm the original performance.
1.4 APPLICATION
1.4.1 Fire hazard assessment
Each test shall be performed in accordance with the general requirements of Section 2 and
the following Sections, as appropriate:
(a) Walls .........................................................................................................Section 3.
(b) Floors, roofs and ceilings............................................................................Section 4.
(c) Columns.....................................................................................................Section 5.
(d) Beams, girders and trusses ..........................................................................Section 6.
(e) Doorsets and shutter assemblies ..................................................................Section 7.
(f) Uninsulated glazing ....................................................................................Section 8.
(g) Air ducts ....................................................................................................Section 9.
(h) Service penetrations and control joints ......................................................Section 10.
(i) Fire damper and air transfer grille assemblies ............................................Section 11.
(j) Critical services........................................................................................Section 12.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
The requirements in Sections 3 to 12 shall take precedence over the general requirements of
Section 2.
NOTES:
1 The results of the fire tests may be used to directly assess fire hazard, but it should be
recognized that a single test method will not provide a full assessment of fire hazard under all
fire conditions.
2 The test methods follow the basic principles and procedures contained in international
Standards, including ISO 834.
AS
1530 Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures
1530.1 Part 1: Combustibility test for materials
1905 Components for the protection of openings in fire-resistant walls
1.6 DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Standard, the definitions below apply.
1.6.1 Access panels
A removable component protecting an opening in a fire-resistant vertical or horizontal
separating element used to access services and the like and may be either fixed or hinged.
1.6.2 Alternative solution
A Building Solution which complies with the Performance Requirements of the Building
Code of Australia other than by reason of satisfying the Deemed-to-Satisfy Provisions.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
1.6.3 Applicant
A company, corporation, organization, association, partnership, individual or
manufacturer’s authorized agent that proposes a test in accordance with this Standard.
1.6.4 Approved
Accepted for use by the regulatory authority or other authority having jurisdiction.
1.6.5 Blank penetration seal
A component that seals an aperture of specified size in a fire-separating element but does
not incorporate any penetrating services.
1.6.6 Combustible
The classification of a material based on its reaction to defined elevated temperature
conditions and which—
(a) has been deemed combustible in accordance with the BCA; and
(b) has been subjected to the test conditions of AS 1530.1 and has exceeded flaming or
temperature rise limits specified in that Standard.
1.6.7 Connecting duct
The duct section between the damper or separating element and the flow-measuring station.
1.6.29 Glazing
An element or elements of construction intended for transmission of light.
1.6.30 Heat flux
The quantity of heat energy per unit area incident on the target of the measuring device. It
includes heat transferred by convection and radiation.
1.6.31 Lift-landing door assembly
A complete assembly comprising multiple leaves, or single leaf, door that open(s) and
close(s) the landing entrance together with its associated frame and supports.
1.6.32 Loading
The load applied to an element of construction during a load-bearing test.
1.6.33 Load-bearing wall
A wall designed to support an externally applied vertical load or a load transferred from
other components.
1.6.34 Multiple penetration systems
Systems where large service openings are provided in a fire-separating element and are
filled with infill material through which the services penetrate and are sealed individually
or in groups to the infill material rather than to the parent element.
1.6.35 Non-load-bearing wall
A wall not designed to be subjected to an external load, other than its self-weight.
1.6.36 Penetration
An aperture through a fire-separating element for the passage of a service or services.
1.6.37 Penetration seal
The system used to maintain the fire resistance of the fire-separating element at the position
where there is provision for services to pass through the element.
1.6.38 Penetration system
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
The assembly for test consisting of the penetrating service or services and the penetration
seal, media or devices, together with any service-supporting construction.
1.6.39 Radiation
Total heat flux as measured by a total heat flux meter.
1.6.40 Resistance to the incipient spread of fire (in respect of a ceiling membrane)
The ability of the membrane to insulate the space between the ceiling and roof, or ceiling
and floor above, so as to limit the temperature rise of materials in this space to a level that
will not permit the rapid and general spread of fire throughout the space to adjoining fire
compartments.
1.6.41 Restraint
The constraint to expansion, shrinkage or rotation (induced by thermal or mechanical
actions) afforded by the conditions at the ends, edges or supports of a test specimen.
1.6.42 Registered testing authority
An organization that—
(a) is described in the BCA as a registered testing authority; and
(b) conducts a fire-resistance test in accordance with this Standard.
SEC T I O N 2 G E N E RA L RE Q U IRE M E NT S
A visual inspection of thermocouples shall be made and any damaged thermocouples likely
to affect the accuracy of the measurement shall be discarded.
NOTE: If the plate thermometer is to be included in the test, reference should be made to
Appendix B.
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
NOTE: Details on attachment for the various materials and surfaces are given in Appendix E.
2.2.3.3 Positioning of the thermocouples
The positioning of the thermocouples used for insulation measurement shall be as follows:
(a) The thermocouples shall be positioned on the unexposed face of the test specimen,
excluding any glazing and the locations specified in Item (b) below.
(b) Thermocouples shall not be positioned opposite or on top of fasteners such as screws,
nails or staples if—
(i) the aggregate area of any part of such fasteners, projected to the unexposed
face, is less than 125 mm 2 within any 125 mm square area; and
(ii) the fasteners do not extend through the assembly.
(c) When the unexposed surface comprises a compressible material such as thermal
insulation, the thermocouples as specified in Clause 2.2.3.1 shall be fixed so that the
thickness of the material is not reduced by more than 5%.
(d) Thermocouples attached to intumescent materials, sealants, thermoplastics, foams,
fibrous insulated materials and similar surfaces, subject to swelling shrinkage,
flowing and melting, shall be secured in such a manner that they are free to follow the
surface movement and conform to the surface curvature.
(e) In the case of non-planar surfaces, the disc and pad shall be deformed to follow the
surface profile. If there is difficulty in fixing the standard pad, the size of the pad,
shall be reduced subject to a minimum diameter of 12 mm.
2.2.3.4 Roving thermocouples
One or more roving thermocouples of the design shown in Figure 2.2.3.4 or alternative
temperature-measuring devices, which can be shown to have at least the accuracy and a
response time equal to or less than the design illustrated by Figure 2.2.3.4, shall be
available to measure the unexposed surface temperature during a test for a minimum period
of 90 s in positions where higher temperatures are suspected. If the temperature rise after
90 s exceeds 175 K, the roving thermocouple(s) shall continue to be applied for a further
90 s and then removed.
The measuring junction of the thermocouple consists of 1.0 mm diameter thermocouple
wires soldered or welded to a 12 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thick copper disc. The thermocouple
assembly shall be provided with a handle so that it can be applied over any point on the
unexposed surface of the test specimen.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
NOTES:
1 When information concerning the internal temperature of a test specimen or particular
component is required, it should be obtained by means of thermocouples having
characteristics appropriate to the range of temperatures to be measured as well as being
suitable for the type of materials in the test specimen.
2 For concrete specimens, the thermocouple wires should be tied to the reinforcement, to ensure
that the thermocouple remains in position during placement of the concrete or if MIMS
thermocouples are used, the overall sheath diameter should not exceed 3.0 mm.
There shall be no significant radiating surfaces other than the specimen within the field of
vision.
2.5.3.2 Specific locations
Measurements shall be taken at either one of the following locations:
(a) Opposite the geometric centre of the specimen, this is referred to as the average heat
flux.
(b) At the point at which the maximum heat flux can be expected. Often this follows
logically or can be calculated from the geometry of the specimen.
If the specimen is symmetrical about its centre and a uniform radiator, this will
coincide with position (a).
If the specimen has areas of differing insulation and/or transmission, then it may be
difficult to predict the point of maximum intensity with any degree or certainty. In
these cases the following procedure shall be used:
(i) Identify all areas where it is anticipated that the temperature will exceed 300°C
and that also have an area in excess of 0.1 m2 (or 65 000 mm 2 for doorsets).
Measure the heat flux opposite the notional centre of each such area.
(ii) Two or more identical parts of the specimen having the same height or width,
separated by less than 0.1 m, may be treated as a single radiation surface.
(iii) Treat the area or sub-area as a single radiating surface if the area, or sub-area,
of the specimen, that is expected to remain below 300°C, is less than 10% of
the total area, or sub-area, under consideration. This allows for breaks such as
glazing bars.
2.5.3.3 Measurement data
Measurements taken at each of the locations specified in Clauses 2.5.3.1 and 2.5.3.2 shall
be recorded throughout the test at intervals not exceeding 1 min.
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
2.8.2 Size
The specimen shall be full size. Where the dimensions of the full size specimen exceed that
of the furnace opening, the minimum dimensions of the specimen shall be
3000 mm × 3000 mm for vertical specimens and 4000 mm × 3000 mm for horizontal
specimens.
2.8.3 Form and composition
The test specimen shall be constructed in accordance with the documentation supplied.
2.8.4 Properties of materials
The testing laboratory may request or carry out tests to establish those properties of the
materials that may be necessary for interpretation of the results of a fire resistance test.
2.8.5 Conditioning
At the time of the test, the strength and moisture content of the test specimen shall
approximate the conditions expected in normal service. If the test specimen contains or is
liable to absorb moisture, it shall not be tested until it has reached an air-dry condition.
Accelerated conditioning is permissible, provided the method does not alter the properties
of component materials or the moisture distribution in the specimen so that it has influence
on the fire behaviour of the specimen. High temperature conditioning shall be below
temperatures critical for the materials.
NOTES:
1 Conditioning temperatures above 60°C are not recommended, unless it can be demonstrated
that the material properties are not significantly modified.
2 It is desirable that the moisture content of timber be between 10% and 15%.
3 It is desirable that the moisture content of concrete be less than 5%.
2.8.6 Specimen clearances inside the furnace
A minimum clearance of 200 mm shall be maintained between the wall, floor and ceiling of
the furnace and any specimen or part of the specimen internal to the furnace chamber (e.g.,
service penetrations and the like).
2.8.7 Specimen orientation
For vertical elements, where the fire risk can be identified as being from one nominated
side only, or the specimen is fully symmetrical, the specimen need only be tested with the
appropriate face exposed to the furnace.
For asymmetrical constructions, where it can be clearly established that there is a weaker
direction of exposure, the specimen may need only to be tested with the weaker face
exposed to the furnace. A full justification for the adopted procedure shall be included in
the test report or letter of opinion obtained from the registered testing authority.
In all other cases, not less than two tests shall be carried out, with at least one being from
each direction of exposure.
For horizontal elements, the test specimen shall be exposed to heating from the underside
only.
The loading system shall be capable of compensating for the maximum allowable
deformation of the test specimen as defined in this Standard.
The loading system shall not inhibit the free movement of air at the unexposed surface and,
other than at the loading point, no part of the loading apparatus shall be closer than 60 mm
from the surface.
A load-bearing element shall be subjected to the test load determined in accordance with
Clause 2.9.2 and restrained in accordance with Clause 2.9.3 for a total time comprising the
following:
(a) A pre-loading period of not less than 15 min and imposed at such a rate as to avoid
any dynamic effects.
(b) The heating period.
2.9.2 Determination of test load
The test load shall be determined on the basis of one of the following:
(a) The actual material properties of the test specimen and a design method specified in
the appropriate Australian Standard or, where this does not exist, in a recognized
structural Standard.
(b) The characteristic material properties of the test specimen and a design method
specified in the appropriate Australian Standard or, where this does not exist, in a
recognized structural Standard. The relationship between the actual material
properties and the characteristic material properties of the test specimen shall be
given or shall be experimentally determined.
(c) A load nominated by the applicant.
2.9.3 Application of restraint
The role of the elements in service shall be considered so that the methods adopted for
supporting or restraining the ends or sides of a test specimen during a test are, as far as
practicable, similar in nature to those that would be applied to a similar element in service.
If restraint is applied in the test, then the restraint conditions shall be specified with regard
to free movements of the element and, as far as practicable, those external forces and
moments that are transmitted to the element by restraint during the test. Where the result is
intended for general application, the specimen shall be tested in the least favourable
condition, as specified in the relevant section.
0 20
5 576
10 679
15 738
30 841
60 945
90 1006
120 1049
180 1110
240 1153
360 1213
The test may be terminated for one or more of the following reasons:
(a) Safety of personnel or impending damage to equipment.
(b) Attainment of selected criteria.
(c) Request of the applicant.
where
I o = average intensity of radiant heat flux emitted by the specimens, in kilowatts per
square metre
I r = intensity of radiant heat flux recorded by the radiometer, in kilowatts per square
metre
ϕ = configuration factor applicable to the measurement
2.12.2.1 General
Failure in relation to integrity shall be deemed to have occurred when evaluated in
accordance with Clauses 2.12.2.2 to 2.12.2.4.
For an element intended to separate spaces and resist the passage of flame from one space
to another, failure in relation to integrity shall be deemed to have occurred upon collapse,
the development of cracks, fissures, or other openings through which flames or hot gases
can pass, or upon other occurrences as set out in the relevant section.
The measurement of the integrity of the test specimen shall be made by cotton pad, gap
gauges or sustained flaming. For uninsulated assemblies, other than service penetrations,
the use of the cotton pad is inappropriate and the gap gauges shall be used to determine
failure. If a specimen contains elements of different thermal resistance, the cotton pad may
be used against those parts deemed to be insulating.
C2.12.2.1 The radiant heat transfer from uninsulated specimens is likely to be sufficient
to cause unpiloted ignition of the cotton pad and, therefore, its use is not considered
appropriate. Users of this Standard should be aware that fire spread due to radiant heat
transfer could occur prior to the stated integrity period for uninsulated specimens.
NOTES:
1 The following test results would indicate that a floor/ceiling system failed in respect of
resistance to incipient spread of fire, insulation and integrity after the stated times, but
complied with the requirements for structural adequacy when the test was terminated at
136 min:
2 The following test results would indicate that an uninsulated doorset failed in respect of
radiation and insulation after the stated times and that the structural adequacy criteria is not
applicable:
2.15.1 General
The test report shall include the following statement:
THE RESULTS OF THESE FIRE TESTS MAY BE USED TO DIRECTLY
ASSESS FIRE HAZARD, BUT IT SHOULD RECOGNIZED THAT A SINGLE
TEST METHOD WILL NOT PROVIDE A FULL ASSESSMENT OF FIRE
HAZARD UNDER ALL FIRE CONDITIONS.
(s) The result stated in terms of time, in elapsed whole minutes, between the
commencement of heating and the time of failure with respect to the relevant criteria
including—
(i) the rate of deflection when this is the criterion used to assess load-bearing
capacity, including the value of d (see Clause 2.12.1) used in calculating the
limiting rate of deflection for flexural members;
(ii) the maximum deflection and the time and position at which it occurred,
supported by adequate graphical data;
(iii) the mode of failure with respect to all integrity criteria;
(iv) the position(s) at which the maximum temperature rise was measured should
this be the case of insulation failure; and
(v) any alternative and additional tests in accordance with Appendix B, e.g., plate
thermometers.
(t) Tabulation or graphical depiction of the output from all pressure-measuring devices,
deflection measuring devices, radiometers, unexposed face thermocouples and, where
applicable, internal thermocouples.
NOTE: The report only needs to include a selection of the measured data sufficient to provide
a history of the performance of the test specimen. For example, it is not necessary to tabulate
the temperature of every thermocouple fixed to a beam at 1 min intervals for the whole
duration of a 90 min test; however, it is recommended that all of the measurements are
included at around the time of failure of all the criteria being considered. Before and after this
period, the interval at which measured data needs to be included in the report may be longer,
for example, 5 to 10 min.
(u) A description of any significant behaviour of the test specimen.
(v) The field of direct application of the results for the specimen to be evaluated, for
example, applicable for fire exposure from direction tested.
(w) The following statements:
THIS REPORT DETAILS METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, THE TEST
CONDITIONS AND THE RESULTS OBTAINED WHEN THE SPECIFIC
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
S E C T I O N 3 W A L L S— V E RT I CA L
SE PAR AT ING E L E ME NT S
3.1 GENERAL
3.1.1 Application
This Section sets out the procedures for determining the fire resistance of masonry,
prefabricated and framed walls, access panels, and insulated glazed elements when forming
part of a wall. It shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
NOTE: Access panels and insulated glazed elements are considered part of the separating
elements and are subject to the relevant criteria of failure.
The performance of doorsets, glazing, dampers, service penetrations and similar
components, often found in walls, are covered by other sections of this Standard.
3.1.2 Vertical separating elements
A vertical construction serving as an enclosure, barrier, division, support, protection, or the
like, and may be solid, framed, or combinations, such as cavity walls. Vertically separating
elements include the following:
(a) Masonry wall A wall, for example, brickwork, concrete blockwork, and gypsum
blocks, that is generally constructed from identical units. Where a bonding material is
used, it is of a type generally used with the masonry unit. See examples in
Figure 3.3.1.1 (A) and (C).
(b) Prefabricated wall Discrete prefabricated panels that are fixed to each other along
the long edges. Examples are gypsum board with a paper honeycomb core, wood-
based panels, strawboard panels or laminated sheets with tongued and grooved edges.
See example in Figures 3.3.1.1(E) and (G).
(c) Framed wall Wall comprising framing members clad with board, which may be
framed product such as steel, wood or aluminium whilst the board may be typically
gypsum board, calcium silicate board, cement particle board, wood composite board,
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
steel or mineral fibre board. A framed wall has a cavity that may be wholly or partly
filled with an insulating material. See examples in Figures 3.3.1.1 (I) and (L).
specimen on the exposed face. Where the difference is greater than 1000 mm, then the full
size sheet shall be fixed in the centre of the specimen with smaller sheets of equal width on
both sides (see Figures 3.2.3.2(A) and 3.2.3.2(B)).
3.3 INSTRUMENTATION
3.3.1 Measurement of temperature
3.3.1.1 General
Specimen thermocouples shall comply with Clause 2.2.3 and shall be positioned in
accordance with Clauses 3.3.1.2 and 3.3.1.3 (see Figures 3.3.1.1(A) to 3.3.1.1(N)).
3.3.1.2 Average temperature measurement
To measure the average temperature rise on the unexposed face of the specimen, five
thermocouples shall be used. One thermocouple shall be placed close to the centre and the
rest shall be placed close to the centre of each quarter section. These thermocouples shall
not be attached to the specimen over thermal bridges, joints, junction, through connections
and fixings such as bolts, screws or nails. Thermocouples shall not be placed over a ridge or
in a depression unless it is wide enough for a disc to make full contact.
For specimens of non-uniform thickness, for example surfaces with corrugations or ribs, the
thermocouples may be appropriately positioned in order to determine average temperatures.
Access panels and insulated glazed elements shall include at least one thermocouple in the
geometric centre.
3.3.1.3 Maximum temperature—General
Additional thermocouples complying with Clause 2.2.3 shall be attached to the specimen to
measure the maximum temperature rise at locations that are considered to have a higher
heat transfer.
A roving thermocouple shall be provided for measuring the maximum temperature at any
point on the surface of the specimen during the test.
3.3.1.4 Maximum temperature—Load-bearing
Thermocouples shall be attached as follows:
(a) At the head of the specimen at mid-width.
(b) At the head of the specimen in line with a stud.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(f) At mid-width, where possible, with the centre of the pad 15 mm from the edge of a
horizontal joint (positive pressure zone).
(g) At mid-height, where possible, with the centre of the pad 15 m from the edge of a
vertical joint (positive pressure zone).
Examples of thermocouple positions are shown in Figures 3.3.1.1(A) to 3.3.1.1(N).
3.3.1.6 Inside wall temperatures
Thermocouples, which are used to measure temperatures inside the wall for additional
information or field of application purposes, shall be attached at appropriate positions
without damaging the specimen. The first 25 mm of each thermocouple, where practicable,
shall be in the isothermal plane.
3.3.2 Measurement of deflection
3.3.2.1 General
Instrumentation complying with Clause 2.4 shall be used to measure horizontal and vertical
deflection.
3.3.2.2 Measurement of horizontal deflection—Both load-bearing and non-load-bearing
Measurements shall be made at mid-height, at the centre of the specimen and 50 mm from
the free edge.
NOTE: The Information on the deformation of the walls may be used to extend the application of
the test results.
3.3.2.3 Measurement of vertical deflection—Load-bearing only
At least two measurements shall be made, one at each vertical edge of the specimen (see
Figures 3.3.1.1(A) to 3.3.1.1(N)).
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
3.4 LOADING
3.4.1 General
When subjected to loads, all load-bearing walls shall be tested and calculated in accordance
with Clause 2.9 and in consultation with the applicant.
3.4.2 Vertical load
Vertical load shall be applied to either the top or bottom edge, with the vertical edges left
free to deform.
3.4.3 Method of loading
The load shall be applied either uniformly across the width of the specimen by a loading
beam or by individual loading jacks at selected points, where this is more representative of
the use of the construction. If the test specimen is designed to be eccentrically loaded, or if
only one leaf of a cavity construction is to be loaded, these conditions shall be reproduced
in the specimen.
3.4.4 Loading frame
The test specimen shall be erected within a loading frame having appropriate stiffness in
relation to the test construction and to the loads that will be imposed upon it during the test.
As a guide, the load distribution members should not deflect more than 1 mm under a force
of 10 kN applied at the centre span, in the plane of the frame.
3.4.5 Loading system
The loading system shall be capable of compensating for the maximum allowable
deformation of the specimen.
direction will give a lower fire resistance, the first test shall be conducted in that direction
and the testing authority may, at its discretion, waive the second test.
3.5.2 Fire resistance from one direction
Where an element is to resist fire in one direction only, the test specimen shall be tested in
that direction.
4.1 GENERAL
4.1.1 Application
This Section sets out the procedures for determining the fire resistance of load-bearing and
non-load-bearing horizontal separating elements when exposed to heating from the
underside. It applies to floors, roofs, ceilings, combinations of floor/ceiling systems,
roof/ceiling systems, access panels, and insulated glazed elements when forming part of a
horizontal separating element.
This Section shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
NOTE: Access panels and insulated glazed elements are considered part of the separating
elements and are subject to the relevant criteria of failure.
The testing procedures in this section are also applicable to ceilings, either suspended by
hangers or fixed directly to a supporting frame or construction, and to self-supporting
ceilings. These systems intrinsically possess fire resistance independent of any building
element above.
This Section also includes a procedure for assessing incipient spread of fire, which only
applies where the ceiling system is the primary barrier between compartments by way of the
ceiling void.
4.1.2 Horizontal separating elements
Horizontally orientated separating elements include the following:
(a) Floor A load-bearing element of a building providing horizontal fire separation.
When the floor assembly includes a protective membrane, its performance is assessed
as an integral part of the complete assembly.
(b) Floor-ceiling systems A composite load-bearing element of a building comprising
both a floor and ceiling providing horizontal fire separation. When the floor assembly
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(g) Ceiling system for protection of structural members A ceiling system that is
designed to act as a horizontal separating element to provide full or partial protection,
supplementing other forms of protection, to maintain the structural adequacy
requirements of a structural member.
NOTES:
1 A ceiling system may be used to supplement spray protection, or the like, already applied
to a structural member.
2 A ceiling system that has an established level of performance to the resistance of the
incipient spread of fire will provide structural protection for at least an equivalent period
of time.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
4.3.2 Size
This specimen size shall comply with Clause 2.8.2.
4.3.3 Floor systems
Floor systems, acting as horizontal separating elements without the aid of a protective
membrane, shall comprise a representative portion of the proposed system including all
structural, support and suspension systems.
4.3.10 Construction
4.3.10.1 General
The specimen shall incorporate—
(a) longitudinal and transverse joints;
(b) services, such as lighting or air-handling systems, that are an integral part of the
design of the element; and
(c) beams that are an integral part of the design of the element, instrumented as required
by Section 6.
4.3.10.2 Ceilings
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
Where the ceiling design includes longitudinal and transverse joints, the test specimen shall
include such joints in both longitudinal and transverse directions. The profiles bearing the
various components or panels of the ceiling shall be installed against each other without any
gap, unless a gap (or gaps) is required for design purposes. In this case, the gap (or gaps)
shall be installed within the specimen and not at its perimeter.
The test specimen shall be mounted in a test frame, to prohibit thermal elongation of the
specimen and component members so that the thermal expansion behaviour of grid
members and expansion devices can be correctly evaluated.
If the horizontal and transverse components vary in cross-section, the component that is
closer to the ceiling membrane shall be orientated parallel to the longitudinal axis.
Self-supporting ceilings, smaller than full size, shall incorporate one free edge at the end of
the longest span and no allowance shall be made for longitudinal movement or thermal
expansion around the perimeter.
Supported ceilings smaller than full size shall be fixed to the specimen support frame and
no allowance shall be made for longitudinal movement or thermal expansion around the
perimeter.
4.4 INSTRUMENTATION
4.4.1 Measurement of temperature
Temperatures shall be measured using thermocouples complying with Clause 2.2.3 and
positioned in accordance with Clause 2.2.3 at the locations given in Clauses 4.4.2 to 4.4.5.
4.4.2 Temperature measurement of the unexposed specimen surface
4.4.2.1 General
The following applies:
(a) Surface thermocouples of the type specified in Clause 2.2.3 shall be attached to the
unexposed surface of the test specimen to measure the average and maximum
temperature rise.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(b) The thermocouples shall not be placed closer than 100 mm from an uninsulated
glazed element or 100 mm from the free edge(s) of the test specimen.
4.4.2.2 Thermocouples for measuring the average temperature rise
The following applies:
(a) Five thermocouples shall be evenly distributed over the test specimen to monitor the
temperature of the unexposed surface of the specimen as defined in Clause 4.2. They
shall be placed one in the centre of the specimen and one at the centre of each quarter
section.
(b) For test specimens that contain discrete areas ≥0.1 m 2 and expected to exhibit
different levels of insulation performance, e.g., glazing, each discrete area shall be
individually monitored for average temperature rise. The average temperature rise
shall be measured by thermocouples distributed over each discrete area. One
thermocouple shall be provided for every 1.5 m2 , or part thereof, of the test specimen.
A minimum of two thermocouples for each discrete area shall be provided.
(c) For wooden floors or roof constructions, the distance of these thermocouples to the
side of the nearer joist shall be at least 50 mm.
(d) For wooden floors or roof constructions, the distance of the thermocouples to the
joints of the floorboards, panels or slabs shall be at least 50 mm.
(e) Where the test specimen is covered only with one layer of floorboards with a board
width of less than 100 mm, the distance shall be half the width of the boards.
(f) Where the test specimen has insulated parts of differing thicknesses, the number of
thermocouples on the unexposed face shall be increased to six to provide equal
numbers of thermocouples at the maximum and minimum thicknesses.
4.4.2.3 Thermocouples for measuring the maximum temperature rise
The following applies:
(a) If the test specimen incorporates discrete areas of different thermal insulation, which
are evaluated separately, the evaluation of maximum exposed face temperature of
these areas shall also be undertaken separately. This may require additional
unexposed surface thermocouples.
(b) For floors or roofs with wooden beams or joists, the distance to the nearest side of the
beam or joist shall be at least 50 mm.
(c) The distance of the thermocouples to the joints shall be 15 ±2 mm.
(d) Additional thermocouples shall be positioned as follows:
(i) Before the heating period—at any point, including a joint, which, in the opinion
of the testing authority, is likely to become hotter than those points specified in
Clause 4.4.2.1.
(ii) During the heating period—at any time during the test, thermocouples at any
point, including a joint, that appears to be hotter than those being measured.
4.4.3 Temperature measurement of structural elements
4.4.3.1 Reinforced or prestressed concrete elements
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted
for reinforced or prestressed concrete elements, thermocouples shall be positioned on the
steel surface, nearest the heated face as a minimum, and on the element, or not less than
four representative tendons or bars at not less than three positions. One position shall be
located within 100 mm of the centre of the test specimen and two other positions shall be
located not less than 500 mm from the wall of the furnace. In addition, not fewer than two
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
thermocouples shall be positioned on at least one stirrup, if any, at each end of the test
specimen.
4.4.3.2 Beams, joists, girders or truss elements
Where a beam, joist, girder or truss is incorporated in the test specimen, thermocouples
shall be positioned in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6.3.1.
Additional fixed thermocouples shall be used for determining the maximum temperature
rise on the unexposed face of the ceiling at locations where higher temperatures might be
expected, for example, joints for metal fixtures.
4.4.3.3 Temperature measurement for resistance to incipient spread of fire
Where a ceiling system is required to have resistance to incipient spread of fire to a space
between ceiling and roof, or ceiling and floor above, five thermocouples complying with
Clause 2.2.3(c) (with insulating pads) shall be evenly distributed within the plenum to
monitor the temperature of the unexposed surface of the ceiling membrane. They shall be
placed with one in the centre of the specimen and one at the centre of each quarter section.
When testing corrugated or ribbed specimens, the number of thermocouples on the
unexposed face shall be increased to six to provide an equal number at points of maximum
and minimum specimen thickness, as specified in Section 2.
4.5 LOADING
4.5.1 Loading of suspension devices
In addition to the requirements of Clause 2.9, a static load shall be applied to any
suspension rod, or the like, that penetrates ceilings, where such suspension devices in
service support loads that may influence the behaviour of these devices during a fire
exposure and consequently affect the fire endurance of the ceiling system.
4.5.2 Load distribution
The contact area between a loading point and the surface of a floor or trafficable roof shall
be through a pad not less than 100 mm × 100 mm and no more than 200 mm × 200 mm
individually and shall not exceed 16% of the total surface area.
4.6 RESTRAINT
4.6.1 General
Where restraint conditions required under Clause 2.9.3 cannot be defined, the test specimen
shall be simply supported and unrestrained.
4.6.2 Horizontal separating elements
Test specimens representing horizontal separating elements shall be tested simply supported
unless the boundary conditions (with respect to restraint and number of edge supports)
representative of practice can be simulated.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
the results may be applied to ceilings of the same size or less than that tested.
(b) For self-supporting ceilings of practical span less than 4 m but of a width equal to or
greater than 3 m (and tested at a practical span and 3 m in width) and in which the
most onerous direction lies in the 4 m direction of the furnace, the results may be
applied to ceilings of the same span or less than that tested. There shall be no
restriction on application of the results in the width direction. The provisions with
respect to the most onerous configuration, as given in Clause 4.3.10.2, shall be
followed in direct application of the results.
4.11.2.2 Fixtures
Spacing of the tested fixtures, such as lightfittings, may be increased.
4.11.3 Suspended ceilings
4.11.3.1 Size
Test results obtained on a 4 m × 3 m test specimen may be applied to ceilings of the same
size or less than that tested.
4.11.3.2 Fixtures
Spacing of the tested fixtures, such as lightfittings, may be increased.
S E C T I O N 5 CO L U M N S
5.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedure for determining the fire resistance of columns. It shall
be read in conjunction with Section 2.
5.3 INSTRUMENTATION
5.3.1 Thermocouples for structurally critical temperatures
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted,
thermocouples shall be attached in accordance with Clause 2.2.4 and positioned as follows:
(a) For a 3000 mm steel specimen, a minimum of four transverse sections shall be
selected. At each of these sections, a minimum of two thermocouples shall be
positioned. For a steel specimen less than 3000 mm long, a minimum of two
transverse sections shall be selected not closer than 300 mm from the ends of the
specimen. At each of these sections a minimum of four thermocouples shall be
positioned.
NOTE: Figure 6.3.1.2 provides recommended locations for thermocouples.
(b) For other than a steel specimen, thermocouples shall be positioned at all locations
considered to be critical.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(c) The requirements for loading specimens with the maximum and minimum protection
thicknesses may be waived subject to agreement between the test laboratory and
applicant, provided the following is observed:
(i) The columns are subjected to the specified axial load in accordance with
Clause 2.9.2.
(ii) The height of each test specimen is 3 m ±200 mm.
5.6 OBSERVATIONS
5.6.1 Displacement
The longitudinal displacement versus time shall be recorded.
5.6.2 Structurally critical temperatures
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted,
a record shall be made of temperature versus time for all the thermocouples positioned in
accordance with Clause 5.3.1.
The results of the fire test contained in the test report are directly applicable without
reference to the testing authority to similar constructions where a change has been made in
the reduction of the height of a column without an increase in the load.
Reference should be made to the relevant structural design Standards for other permissible
variations.
6.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedures for determining the fire resistance of beams, girders
and trusses including those incorporated in or supporting floors or roofs. It shall be read in
conjunction with Section 2.
6.3 INSTRUMENTATION
6.3.1 Thermocouples for structurally critical temperatures
6.3.1.1 General
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted,
Clause 6.3.1.2, 6.3.1.3 or 6.3.1.4 shall apply, as appropriate (see also Clause 2.2.4).
6.3.1.2 Steel elements
For a 3000 mm steel specimen, a minimum of four transverse sections shall be selected. At
each of these sections, a minimum of two thermocouples shall be positioned. For a steel
specimen less than 3000 mm long, a minimum of two transverse sections shall be selected
not closer than 300 mm from the ends of the specimen. At each of these sections a
minimum of four thermocouples shall be positioned.
Where the element is a truss, at least one thermocouple shall be positioned on each member
of the truss.
NOTE: Figure 6.3.1.2 shows recommended locations for thermocouples.
universal application, the load applied to the beam shall equal the maximum loading that
may be applied to the beam for the various methods by which the beam may be connected
to the heat sink in practice.
6.4.2.2 Loading of specimens subject to temperature-measurement procedures
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted,
the loading may be waived subject to the following conditions:
(a) If it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the test laboratory by means of full-
scale testing that the applied fire insulation system will remain in place throughout
the test.
NOTE: An insulation system includes materials, fixings, joints and application techniques.
(b) Where a series of beams is to be tested to determine the effectiveness of different
thicknesses of protective materials, loadings are applied to those specimens having
the thickest and the thinnest protection in the range.
6.6 OBSERVATIONS
6.6.1 Structurally critical temperatures
Where temperature-measurement procedures in accordance with Clause 2.11.5 are adopted,
a record shall be made of temperature versus time for all the thermocouples positioned in
accordance with Clause 6.3.1.
6.6.2 Deflection
A record shall be made of deflection versus time for each point of measurement.
7.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedures for determining the fire resistance of—
(a) doorsets with hinged or pivoted leaves;
(b) doorsets with horizontally sliding or vertically sliding leaves or panels, including
articulated sliding panels or sectional leaves;
(c) steel, single-skin folding shutters;
(d) other sliding folding door leaves or panels;
(e) tilting doorsets;
(f) lift landing doorsets; and
(g) rolling shutter doors.
NOTE: AS 1905.1 for fire doorsets, AS 1905.2 for fire shutters and AS 1735.11 for lift-landing
door assemblies should be read in conjunction with this Standard in order to determine any
provisions dealing with orientation and mounting of the test specimen.
This Section shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
This Section does not apply to access panels and hatches, which shall be tested in their
respective separating elements, as specified in the relevant section of this Standard.
assembly (e.g., between door leaf/leaves and the frame) shall be measured prior to the test.
Sufficient measurements shall be made to describe adequately the nature of the gaps and
these shall be at not less than 750 mm apart and there shall be a minimum of three
measurements to each edge of the leaf.
The dimensions of clearance gaps shall be given to an accuracy not exceeding ±0.5 mm.
Inaccessible gaps shall be measured indirectly.
7.2.7 Final setting
Prior to the fire test, the doorset, lift-landing door or shutter assembly shall be subjected to
a final closing involving opening the assembly to a distance of approximately 300 mm and
returning it to the closed position. Where applicable, this shall be done by the closing
device. If the doorset does not contain any closing mechanism, then it shall be closed by
hand without undue force.
Doors may be latched prior to the fire test but shall not be locked unless the door can only
be retained in the closed position during normal use by utilizing the lock (that is, there is no
latch or closing device to hold the door in the closed position). No key shall be left in the
lock.
If the final setting procedures are carried out with the specimen in position on the furnace,
then the furnace shall be at ambient pressure conditions (that is, with no air input or
extraction).
7.3 INSTRUMENTATION
7.3.1 Heat flux meter
A heat flux meter shall be positioned in accordance with Clause 2.5.2, to measure the total
heat flux from the specimen or any feature of the specimen (see Clause 2.5).
NOTE: This measurement provides data for an assessment of a safe distance for the location of
combustible materials from a protected opening together with the passage of people. Sufficient
information should be included in the report to identify the nature of the radiating surface and any
non-uniform features shall be specifically identified.
7.3.2 Thermocouples
7.3.2.1 General
Thermocouples complying with Clause 2.2.3.1 shall be attached in accordance with
Clause 2.2.3.2 on the unexposed face of the doorset or shutter assembly. Thermocouple
locations shall be as follows in accordance with Clauses 7.3.2.2 to 7.3.2.3.
7.3.2.2 Non-insulated
Where the applicant does not require evaluation of the doorset or shutter, or any part
thereof, against the insulation criteria, no temperature measurements are required and the
specimen shall be reported as having zero insulation.
7.3.2.3 Location
For doorsets and shutter assemblies not covered by Clause 7.3.2.1, the thermocouple
locations shall be as follows:
(a) Where the door leaf or shutter has a width of not less than 750 mm and an area of not
less than 1.5 m 2 , there shall be a total of five thermocouples; one at approximately the
centre of the specimen and one at the centre of each quarter section.
(b) Where the door leaf or shutter has a width of less than 750 mm or an area of less than
1.5 m 2, there shall be one thermocouple at approximately the centre of each door leaf
and at least one thermocouple for each 0.3 m2 of area of each door leaf or shutter.
The thermocouples shall be located not less than 50 mm to any joint, stiffener or through-
component. For doorsets or shutters that incorporate non-insulated areas not greater than
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
0.1 m 2, these areas shall be disregarded for the purpose of ascertaining the average
unexposed face temperature.
7.3.2.4 Maximum temperature
Maximum temperature shall be determined from the five thermocouples fixed to determine
the average temperature rise (as given in Clause 7.3.2.2), the roving thermocouple and from
the following additional thermocouples:
(a) Thermocouples shall be fixed to areas of the leaf or shutter where the temperature
may be higher than the mean for the surface, e.g., over stiffeners.
(b) Thermocouples shall be fixed to the doorframe, including the frame containing any
transom panel or side panel—
(i) at mid-height of each of the vertical members;
(ii) at mid-width of the horizontal top member of the frame, and transom if fitted,
for single-leaf doors or for double-leaf doors or assemblies, coincident with the
mid-width of each leaf and one above the meeting stiles; and
(iii) on the horizontal top member of the frame or transom at a distance of 50 mm in
from the corner of the leaf opening.
At each of the positions, thermocouples shall be fixed as close as possible to the edge
of the frame at the junction between the frame and the supporting construction, i.e.,
with the centre of the disc 15 mm from the edge and the pad flush with the edge,
except that the distance of these thermocouples from the inside edge of the frame
shall be not greater than 100 mm.
(c) The thermocouple shall be fixed on the unexposed face of the element where the
specimen is mounted as follows, but subject to the requirements of Clause 7.3.2.4:
(i) Before the heating period—at the locations shown in Figure 7.3.2.3 and at any
point, including a joint, which, in the opinion of the testing laboratory, the
temperature rise is likely to be more than 180°C.
(ii) During the heating period—at any point, including a joint, where the
temperature rise appears to be more than 180°C.
(d) Thermocouples shall be fixed to the face of any over panels and transom panels above
the door leaves and any side panels on the basis of one thermocouple per 0.3 m2 of
panel area.
7.3.2.5 Positioning of thermocouples
The thermocouples specified in Clause 7.3.2.2 and Clause 7.3.2.3, Item (a) and (b), shall be
located not less than 100 mm to the edge of the leaf/leaves or curtain or any standard item
of hardware and shall not be located on any metal through-fastenings or uninsulated glazed
areas (see Figure 7.3.2.5).
The thermocouples specified in Clause 7.3.2.3(c) and Clause 7.3.2.3(d) shall be located not
less than 100 mm from the edge of the doorframe.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
7.5 OBSERVATIONS
7.5.1 Average temperature of unexposed face of door leaf or shutter
The mean of the temperatures measured by the thermocouples positioned in accordance
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
7.6.2.1 Determination
Fire resistance shall be determined with respect to integrity as given in Clause 2.12.2 except
that the 6 × 150 mm gap criterion shall not apply to the sill.
7.6.2.2 Side-hung doorsets
For side-hung doorsets with door leaf or leaves having a latching mechanism, failure in
respect to integrity shall be considered to have occurred when this mechanism ceases to be
engaged. If the latching mechanism is disengaged at the end of the test and the time to
disengagement is not recorded during the test, a zero integrity level shall be assigned.
7.6.3 Insulation
7.6.3.1 General
For doorsets and shutter assemblies not covered by Clause 7.3.2.1, compliance with the
insulation criteria specified in Clause 2.12.3 shall be in accordance with Clauses 7.6.3.2 and
7.6.3.3.
7.6.3.2 Mean temperature rise (temperature on unexposed face of specimen)
For the specimen, the average temperature criterion of Clause 2.11.3(a) shall apply, taking
into consideration thermocouples positioned in accordance with Clause 7.3.2.2.
(k) Result, stated in terms of the elapsed whole minutes, from the commencement of
heating before failure with respect to the relevant criteria given in Clause 7.6.
7.9.4 Doorframe
Variations to the doorframe may be made as follows:
(a) Interchanging single-rebated and double-rebated doorframes.
(b) Increasing the doorstop depth and width.
(c) Increasing or decreasing the metal thickness by ±15%.
(d) Fixing in accordance with AS 1905.1.
The dimensions of steel wrap around frames may be increased to accommodate increased
supporting construction thickness. Where the paint finish is not expected to contribute to
the fire resistance of the door, alternative paint or surface finish is acceptable and may be
added to the door leaves or frame provided it does not exceed 0.5 mm thickness, or have a
nitro-cellulose base.
7.9.5 Wall of masonry or concrete construction
Fire-resistant doorsets tested in walls of masonry or concrete construction may be installed
in any one of such types of walling having the same fire resistance level (FRL).
7.9.6 Fixings
The number of fixings used to attach fire-resisting doorsets to supporting constructions may
be increased but not decreased and the distance between fixings may be reduced but may
not be increased.
7.9.7 Hardware
Variations to hardware may be made as follows:
(a) Variations may be made in electroplated or other metallic finishes and in powder
coats and non-nitrocellulose paint finishes not greater than 0.5 mm thick.
(b) Any push-plate, metallic plate for a hold-open device, or kickplate, which is not held
on by and which does not form part of the latchset or lockset furniture, may be
reduced in either dimension but may not vary in material of construction.
(c) The arm configuration of a surface-mounted closer may be interchanged between
regular-arm and parallel-arm.
(d) The location of the door closer may be varied provided that the distance between the
nearest edge of the closer and the hinge stile is not reduced.
(e) An alterative closer manufactured by the same manufacturer and of a smaller size
closer in the same series of closers may be used provided the closer—
(i) is manufactured from the same materials;
(ii) has the same operating mechanism design; and
(iii) uses the same hydraulic fluids.
(f) The location of the latchset or lockset may be varied up to 80 mm vertically up or
80 mm vertically down.
NOTES:
1 It is recommended that the latch handle be located between 900 mm and 1100 mm above
the finished floor.
2 Reference should be made to AS 1428.1 for the location requirements applicable to
particular types of door hardware and to the relevant Building Code for sanctions
applicable to particular types of buildings.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
shutter curtain and the vertical guides cannot be reduced for size decreases.
(b) For uninsulated shutters, the material thickness may be increased up to 50% but
cannot be reduced beyond acceptable steel industry tolerances.
(c) The material thickness of side guides and end plates carrying the barrel may be
increased by up to 50% but cannot be reduced beyond acceptable steel industry
tolerances.
(d) The mode of operation may be varied from the tested specimen provided that the
proposed mechanism does not impose a greater load on the brackets and barrel
assembly, and no alteration is made to the nominal thickness, materials of
construction, or temperature of fusion of any component parts of the fire-resistant
roller shutter.
(e) Additional or alternative sensing devices may be used from that of the tested
specimen provided that—
(i) they comply with AS 1905.1;
(ii) a fusible link is used;
(iii) they do not alter the automatic operation of the fire resistant roller shutter.
(f) An alternative speed-governing device may be used from that of the tested specimen
provided that—
Standards Australia www.standards.com.au
85 AS 1530.4—2005
(i) it adds no additional load to the brackets and barrel assembly from that in the
tested specimen; and
(ii) it does not alter the automatic operation of the fire resistant roller shutter.
(g) An alternative construction of the threshold may be used, provided that the material is
not deemed combustible in accordance with AS 1530.1, or forms a fire barrier of
same FRL to the fire resistant roller shutter, and the dimensions of the threshold are
maintained in accordance with AS 1905.2.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
8.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedure for determining the fire resistance of uninsulated
glazing systems. It shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
Insulated glazing shall be evaluated in accordance with Sections 3 and 4 and vision panels
within doorsets shall be evaluated in accordance with Section 7.
above, provide the basis of a classification for fire resistance for exposure from either
direction.
NOTE: An openable component or a glazing bead to one side only renders the glazing
asymmetrical.
8.2.3.2 Horizontal or inclined specimens
Horizontal specimens shall be orientated in accordance with Clause 2.8.7. For inclined
specimens, where it is intended that exposure may occur from either side, then both sides
shall be tested.
8.2.4 Test construction
8.2.4.1 Specimen holder
Where the test specimen is both the same size as the opening in the specimen holder and
installed in masonry, concrete or a similar rigid element of construction, then the specimen
shall be installed directly into the specimen holder.
8.2.4.2 Other instances
In all other instances, the specimen shall be surrounded with construction representative of
that intended to be used in practice.
8.3 INSTRUMENTATION
8.3.1 Heat flux meter
A heat flux meter shall be positioned in accordance with Clause 2.5.2, to measure the total
heat flux from the specimen or any feature of the specimen (see Clause 2.5).
For heat flux measurements of vertical or horizontal specimens, the heat flux meter shall be
placed on the line normal to the geometric centre of the specimen and with the plane of the
measuring element parallel with the plane of the specimen.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
For heat flux measurements of inclined specimens, the heat flux meter shall be placed on a
line passing through the geometric centre of the specimen but normal to the plane of the
furnace.
8.3.2 Deflection measurement
Although deflection of the specimen is a not a criteria of failure, measurements may be
taken to enable greater application of the results.
TABLE 8.1
VARIATIONS TO THE ANGLE OF TESTED INCLINATION
Test specimen angle Applicable to glazed element angles in use
Between 80º and 90º 80º to 90º
25º to ≤ 80º α ±15º
0 ≤ 25º 0º to 25º
NOTE: If tests are conducted at 0º, 45º and 90º on the same glazing system, the
minimum rating for the three tests applies to all angles (0º to 90º).
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
S E C T I O N 9 A IR D UCT S
9.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedure for determining the fire resistance of ducts that are
required to—
(a) operate while exposed to an external fire, e.g., air-pressurization or supply ducts; or
(b) conduct hot products of combustion, e.g., smoke-spill or exhaust ducts.
This Section shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
Penetration details of the air duct shall be evaluated during the fire test.
NOTE: As well a determining the fire resistance of the duct under fire conditions, the test may
provide information about reduction in cross-section and heat transfer from the duct walls, which
could allow the designer to determine the duct’s ability to function under fire conditions.
Clause 2.8.6 except it may be mounted against the wall or the floor slab.
(b) The depth of the specimen shall be adjusted so that the aspect ratio is not more
favourable structurally than that of the duct being modelled.
9.2.3 Construction
The specimen shall incorporate the intended methods of jointing, penetration seals and any
special features of construction including methods of support.
9.2.4 Mounting
The specimen shall be mounted as follows:
(a) For external fire testing, the specimen shall extend through the furnace and both ends
of the duct shall be left open to allow the flow of air through the duct.
(b) For internal fire testing, the specimen shall be mounted to penetrate a horizontal or
vertical element of construction as appropriate, protruding in and out of the furnace as
indicated in Clause 9.2.1(b), and it shall permit the exhaust of products of combustion
from the furnace.
(a) Groups of not less than two thermocouples at cross-sections located 25 mm and
400 mm from the unexposed face of the penetrated element, and one additional group
at the end of any step or taper on the external duct insulation at the likely hottest
position of the step or taper.
(b) Additional thermocouples at any point where, in the opinion of the testing laboratory,
that point is likely to become hotter than the locations specified in Item (a).
(c) During the heating period, additional thermocouples at any point, which, at any time
during the test, appears to be hotter than those being measured.
Thermocouples to assess the performance of the penetration sealing system shall be
provided in accordance with Section 10 of this Standard.
9.4 PROCEDURE
9.4.1 External fire testing
The specimen shall be heated on the outside. Airflow of 1 ±0.1 m/s shall be established
prior to the start of the test and the fan speed maintained for the duration of the test. It shall
be measured at the mid cross-section of the duct at the air inlet point.
9.5 OBSERVATIONS
9.5.1 Structural adequacy
A record shall be made of the time when the suspension or fixing devices can no longer
retain the duct in its intended position or when sections of the duct collapse.
9.5.2 Integrity
The following shall be observed and recorded together with the time of the observations:
(a) For external fire testing, any hot gases passing into the duct.
(b) For internal fire testing, any hot gases passing to the unexposed side, except for the
open end.
NOTE: Provision may be made to introduce into the furnace a tracer gas or a substance that
will produce a clearly discernible coloured smoke or gas.
9.5.3 Temperatures
For external fire testing, the temperatures measured by thermocouples located in accordance
with Clause 9.3.1 shall be recorded at maximum 1 min intervals.
9.5.4 Cross-sectional area
Significant changes in the cross-section of the specimen shall be observed and recorded
together with the time of the observation.
collapses in such a manner that the duct no longer fulfils its intended function.
9.6.2 Integrity
Integrity of the duct shall be deemed to be lost—
(a) for internal fire testing, when hot gases can pass to the unexposed side, except for the
open end; and
(b) for external and internal fire testing under the criteria given in Section 10 for service
penetrations.
9.6.3 Insulation
Insulation of the duct shall be deemed to be lost when the temperature rise of any
thermocouple positioned in accordance with Section 10 of this Standard exceeds 180 K.
SECT I ON 1 0 S E RV ICE PE N E T RA T I O NS A N D
C O N T RO L J O I N T S
10.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedure for determining the fire resistance of elements of
construction penetrated by services such as electrical and plumbing services, pipes,
conduits and control joints. It shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
Dampers are covered by Section 11.
fire-affected compartment.
It is not the intention of this test to provide quantitative information on the rate of leakage
of smoke and/or hot gases or on the transmission or generation of fumes. Such phenomena
are only to be noted in describing the general behaviour of specimens during the test.
NOTE: This Standard covers the method of test for service penetrations and control joints, while
AS 4072.1 is a product Standard that covers the construction and installation of service
penetrations and control joints.
10.4.2 Size
The specimen shall comply with Clause 2.8.2
For control joints, the specimen shall be not less than 1 m × 1 m and the length of the
control joint exposed to the furnace chamber shall be not less than 1 m.
The service(s) shall be installed so that it projects a minimum of 500 mm on each side of
the supporting construction, of which at least 200 mm shall extend beyond the extremities
of the penetration sealing system. The penetration sealing system shall include any coating,
wrapping or other protection to the services. The length of unprotected service on the
unexposed face shall not be greater than 500 mm. For plastic pipes, the external projection
away from the furnace shall be increased to a minimum of 2000 mm. These measurements
shall not include any part of the plug or cap used to seal a pipe within the furnace.
10.4.3 Test mounting
10.4.3.1 General
Where a particular penetration sealing system is intended for use in both horizontal and
vertical elements of construction, each orientation shall be tested.
Where multiple penetrations through the one specimen are to be tested, the configuration
shall be such that an unimpeded view of all parts of the sealing system is possible for the
purpose of determining integrity failure.
Control joints may only need to be tested horizontally, if, in the opinion of the testing
authority, the horizontal orientation represents the most severe test.
10.4.3.2 Vertical elements
For vertical elements, where the fire risk can be identified as being from one nominated
side only, or the sealing system is fully symmetrical, the specimen need only be tested with
the appropriate face exposed to the furnace.
For asymmetrical constructions, where it can be clearly established that there is a weaker
direction of exposure, the specimen may only need to be tested with the weaker face
exposed to the furnace. A full justification for the adopted procedure shall be included in
the test report or letter of opinion obtained from the registered testing authority.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
In all other cases, not less than two tests shall be carried out, with at least one being from
each direction of exposure.
10.4.3.3 Horizontal elements
For horizontal elements, the test specimen shall be exposed to heating from the underside
only.
10.4.4 Supporting construction
The supporting construction shall have a fire resistance level equal to or greater than that of
the proposed penetration and representative of that used in practice. The fire resistance
level obtained shall apply only to that particular type of separating element except for
variations permitted in Clause 10.11 and AS 4072.1.
10.4.5 Service end conditions
Service end conditions shall be representative of those intended to be used in practice.
For general pipe systems, e.g., SWV (soil waste vent), water supply and reticulation, the
fire side capped non-fire side open configuration shall be adopted, i.e., closed/open.
The pipe shall be capped on the exposed side only by welding, gluing or mechanically
fixing a disc or cap of the same material as the pipe, onto the end of the pipe or
ceramic/mineral fibre disc.
TABLE 10.4.6.1
CABLE GROUPINGS
Type Conductor material Sheathing/insulating material
Single core power PVC
Multicore power (e.g., two core XLPE
plus earth) Copper
Multicore communications Aluminium Rubber
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
10.4.6.2 Conduits
The maximum and minimum size of cable enclosure and support systems (cable trays and
the like) shall be tested with the maximum and minimum (usually empty) fill of cables (see
Note) that unless a registered test laboratory is able to ascertain that a particular
configuration represents the worst case.
NOTE: The cables may be selected from the provisions given in Appendix D.
For plastic pipes and enclosures, the requirements set out in AS 4072.1 shall apply when
determining suitable test configurations.
10.4.6.3 Busbars and busways
The maximum and minimum size and number of conductors shall be tested to evaluate a
type of busbar or busway over a range of sizes, unless a registered test laboratory is able to
ascertain that a particular configuration represents the worst case.
NOTE: In some instances the performance of busbars may be assessed using test data on pipes of
the same material (e.g., copper).
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
DIMENSION IN MILLIMETRES
10.6 INTEGRITY
In addition to the cotton pads specified in Clause 2.6.1, additional cotton pads shall be
provided with a reduced size of 30 mm × 30 mm × 20 mm. An additional wire frame holder
as described in Clause 2.6.1 modified to accommodate the smaller cotton pad shall also be
provided.
All service penetration systems are deemed to be insulated for the purposes of assessing
integrity and therefore, the cotton pad test is applicable for the duration of the test.
C10.6 Without the cotton wool pad there would be no control over gaps less than 6 mm
around services and the application of grilles with openings less than 150 mm which would
allow fire spread. The introduction of the cotton wool pad test is a relaxation of the existing
requirements.
10.7 INSULATION
10.7.1 General
At the request of the applicant and with the agreement of the testing authority, the
performance of a penetration system with respect to the criterion of insulation failure need
not be evaluated. Under these circumstances, thermocouples on the non-fire side may be
omitted and a zero insulation rating recorded in the test report.
10.7.2 Cable penetrations
If during the test, fissuring of the insulating materials occurs, exposing conductors before
the temperature rise measured on the cables has exceeded 180 K, the temperature of the
exposed conductors shall be measured by a roving thermocouple, provided that the fissure
is wider than 12 mm. This temperature shall be used in the determination of the insulation
rating.
10.8.4 Insulation
Temperatures recorded from thermocouples that become embedded in softening material or
covered by intumescent material shall be disregarded.
10.8.5 Additional observations
Any occurrences in the furnace of any artificial support to a service under test, for example,
if it sags and is supported by the floor or the furnace or another test specimen, shall be
recorded.
(c) Results obtained from framed wall systems may be applied to the performance of a
system in concrete, masonry or solid gypsum blocks of greater or equal thickness to
that of the tested prototype. The reverse does not apply.
(d) Results obtained from framed wall systems may be applied to similar walls having
studs of the same material with sizes greater than the tested prototype.
(e) Results obtained from a prototype test may be applied to framed wall systems of
similar construction but having thicker facings of the same material applied to the
studs.
10.11.3 Metal pipes
10.11.3.1 Sealing systems tested in accordance with Appendix E
The results may be applied to brass pipes of the same composition up to maximum outside
diameter of 101.6 mm (normally 70/30 arsenical brass) and to copper and ferrous metal
pipes having wall thicknesses greater than or equal to those listed in Table 10.11.3.1.
Provided that the same penetration sealing system was used for the above penetrations in
the same type of separating element and all the specimens achieved the required FRL.
TABLE 10.11.3.1
METAL PIPE DEEMED TO HAVE EQUIVALENT
FIRE RESISTANCE LEVELS
Nominal size Actual OD Actual wall thickness
(mm) (mm) (mm)
32 31.75 0.91
40 38.10 0.91
50 50.80 0.91
65 63.50 0.91
80 76.20 1.22
90 88.90 1.22
100 101.60 1.22
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
The test results on the standard configurations specified in Appendix D may be applied to
all PVC-insulated and sheathed power and communications cables with copper conductors.
10.11.5 Plastic pipes
10.11.5.1 General
In addition to the requirements of Clause 10.11.2, test results may be directly applied to
masonry and concrete elements thicker than the tested prototype when installed in
accordance with Figure 10.11.5.
Results obtained from a particular test shall not be applied to plastic pipes of different
diameters, wall thicknesses or material types, except for the following applications:
(a) The fire protection system shall be subjected to the fire-resistance test when
protecting 40 mm, 50 mm, 65 mm, 80 mm and 100 mm nominal size PVC-U DWV
for separating elements and all sizes shall achieve the required FRL.
(b) For other types of plastic pipes and pipe wall thicknesses, if the maximum and
minimum sizes have also been tested and achieved, the required FRL in the subject
separating element, a registered testing authority may provide an opinion of the
performance of intermediate sizes provided the outside diameter of the largest pipe
does not exceed 120 mm and the outside diameter of the smallest pipe is not less than
40 mm.
Results obtained from tests on penetrations through vertical separating elements shall not be
used to assess performance in horizontal elements, and vice versa.
As penetration seals for plastic pipes are dependent for activation upon exposure to fire
conditions, they shall always be installed with the same orientation and fire exposure as was
established in the fire-resistance test.
10.11.5.2 Services not perpendicular to the fire separation
Penetrations not perpendicular to the plane of the element are acceptable provided that the
fire-stopping system has similar exposure and dimensions to the tested prototype.
10.11.6 Control joints
The following variations are permitted:
(a) Results obtained with butt-joints may be applied to contoured joints (see
Figure 10.11.6) provided that, if only one specimen has been tested, the results may
be applied to joints of the same configuration having—
(i) equal width and equal or greater depth of sealant; and
(ii) equal or greater thickness of fire-separating element.
(b) Facings may be applied to the surface of the fire-stopping system.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
SE C T I ON 1 1 F I RE D A M PE R A N D A I R
T R ANS F E R G R I L L E A SSE M B L I E S
11.1 GENERAL
This Section specifies the procedure for determining the fire resistance of fire dampers and
air transfer grilles that are used to prevent the passage of fire from one fire compartment to
another. It shall be read in conjunction with Section 2.
This Section may also be used to provide data for the assessment of the ability of dampers
to resist the spread of hot smoke, although limiting leakage rate for these purposes are not
specified in this Standard.
This Section does not include the evaluation of smoke control dampers under ambient and
medium temperature exposures.
tightness of the damper system is measured by direct flow measurements whilst maintaining
a constant pressure differential across the closed damper of 300 Pa. For special
applications, alternative differential pressures may be employed.
11.3 APPARATUS
11.3.1 General
The test apparatus specified in Clause 11.3.1 to 11.3.7, including the instrumentation, shall
be in accordance with Section 2 except where specifically stated otherwise in
Clauses 11.3.2 to 11.3.8.
An example of a test arrangement is shown in Figure 11.3.1.
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
The maximum size of the test specimen shall be 1200 mm × 1200 mm. For multiple
modular systems, the largest single modular shall have been tested up to a maximum size of
1200 m × 1200 mm and additional supporting test data shall be required to assess the
performance of larger modular damper assemblies.
11.4.10 Specimen installation
The dampers shall be installed, as in practice, in a supporting construction using methods
that are in accordance with the applicant’s instructions. Where the applicant requires the
damper to be tested in a length of insulated ductwork, the length over which the duct is to
be insulated, as shown in Figure 11.3.6(A), shall be specified.
11.5 TEST
11.5.1 Determination of background leakage of connecting duct and measuring
station
The procedure for determining the background leakage of connecting duct and measuring
station is as follows:
(a) Shut the fire damper manually and seal the inlet aperture using impervious material.
(b) Assemble the connecting duct, measuring station and exhaust fan as shown in
Figure 11.3.1 or Figure 11.3.2. The joints between each component shall be well
sealed with high temperature gaskets and/or sealants.
(c) Connect the flow-measuring device to a suitable recording instrument calibrated and
complying with the requirements of ISO 5167-1 and ISO 5221. It may be necessary to
use a different size of orifice plate, venturi or other suitable device for the
determination of the leakage of the connecting duct to that used for the leakage tests
described in Clause 11.5. The leakage shall be calculated from the recorded pressure
differential from the flow-measuring device using the formulae for volume flow rates
given in ISO 5167-1 and ISO 5221 or by calibration.
(d) Adjust the exhaust fan so that the air leakage through the connecting duct and
measuring station can be measured at 200 Pa, 300 Pa, 400 Pa and 500 Pa. The
pressure differential at each value should be maintained for 60 s before the leakage is
recorded.
(e) Plot the values on graph paper or use a regression analysis to determine the leakage at
300 Pa.
(f) If the leakage at 300 Pa is more then 12 m 3/h, improve the sealing of joints and
stability of the test construction until the leakage criterion referred to above can be
met.
(g) Remove the sealing from the inlet aperture of the damper.
11.5.2 Combined fire and leakage test
11.5.2.1 Test set-up
The combined fire and leakage test shall be conducted in accordance with the following:
(a) Subject the damper to 50 opening and closing cycles.
(b) Mount the test specimen onto the furnace with the fire damper in the open position.
(c) Connect all instrumentation required by this Section.
(d) With the damper fully open, set the exhaust fan system to produce an air velocity of
0.15 m/s through the damper. This may be measured by the flow-measuring device
located within the measuring duct. The air velocity shall be maintained to an accuracy
of ±15%.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(e) Switch off the exhaust fan, but leave at its pre-set value given in Clause 11.5.2.1(d).
(f) Ignite the furnace. Start the timing device and switch on all measuring devices.
(g) Switch on the exhaust fan as soon as the furnace has ignited.
(h) When the damper has closed or at 300 s, whichever occurs first, adjust the exhaust
fan to maintain an under-pressure of 300 Pa in the connecting duct, relative to the
furnace.
11.5.2.2 During the test
During the test the following shall be carried out:
(a) Control and record the furnace temperature and pressure in accordance with
Section 2. The furnace pressure at the horizontal centre-line of a vertical damper shall
be maintained at 15 ±3 Pa.
(b) Maintain a pressure differential between the connecting duct and the furnace of
−300 ±15 Pa.
(c) Record the pressure differential across the flow-measuring device and the local gas
temperature at not more than 1 min intervals.
Constants for flow measuring shall be calculated in accordance with ISO 5167-1 over
the range of anticipated gas temperatures. As a function of time and measured gas
temperatures, select the corresponding flow-measuring device constant and calculate
the volume flow rate at the measuring station gas temperatures using the formulae for
volume flow rates given in ISO 5167-1 and ISO 5221.
(d) Record the temperature on the external surface of the connecting duct.
(e) The effect of gaps, orifices or openings on the integrity at the junction between the
supporting construction and connecting duct shall be determined by the use of the
cotton pad and/or gap gauges as defined in Section 2.
(f) Where practicable, record any observations of the general behaviour of the damper
assembly during the test. In practice this will be limited to observations taken on the
furnace side and to the duct/damper junction and on the non-furnace side.
C11.6.2 Tests in accordance with the test method described in ISO 10294-1 were
undertaken on a range of European and North American fire dampers, all of which satisfied
conventional measurements for integrity. It was established that the existing products were
capable of satisfying a leakage limit of 360m3/(h/m 2 ), and this limit was adopted for
evaluation of compliance of integrity using gas flow measurements (E designation). In
relation to smoke leakage, available analytical data was examined, taking into account
such parameters as acceptable concentrations of smoke, required degree of dilution, time
for escape, which led to an acceptable smoke leakage of 200 m3/(h/m2 ) being derived. This
is the limit used for checking compliance with the S designation.
11.6.2.2 Insulation
Only the maximum temperature criterion of Section 2 shall apply, taking into consideration
the temperatures measured by the thermocouples specified in Clause 11.3.5.
11.6.2.3 Leakage
The leakage rate specified in Clause 11.6.2.1(c) shall apply to the assessment of the
potential for fire spread under the criteria for integrity only.
Substantially lower leakage rates may be specified for applications where the damper is
required to resist the spread of hot smoke in addition to resisting the spread of fire.
A test result obtained for a fire damper mounted in a supporting construction made of
masonry, concrete or solid portions (without any cavity) is applicable from the same type
and construction with a thickness and density equal to or greater than those at the
supporting construction used for the test.
S E C T I O N 1 2 CR IT I C A L SE RV ICE S
12.1 GENERAL
This Section sets out the procedure for determining the test method for assessing the ability
of systems to protect critical services under fire conditions. It shall be read in conjunction
with Section 2.
This Section is applicable to, but is not limited to, the following services:
(a) Current-carrying cables and busways.
(b) Fibre optical cables.
(c) Data cables.
(d) Communication systems.
(e) Fire detection and alarm wiring.
(f) Hydrant systems.
(g) Emergency control systems.
(h) Any other services that may be required to operate at some level in the event of fire.
Wiring systems requiring to be classified for fire performance shall be tested in accordance
with AS 3013.
This Section may also be applied to the enclosure of hazardous services such as pipes
carrying flammable fluids and medical gas lines.
Guidance is provided on the selection of appropriate criteria for some critical services,
which may be applied in lieu of testing specimens with operating services.
These performance criteria of services may vary depending on the usage of the building and
may be specified as part of a deemed-to-satisfy solution or a performance-based solution.
This method may be applied to enclosed systems (ducts/shafts) and coated systems and is
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(f) The minimum clearances between the specimen and the furnace lining or other
specimens shall be at least 200 mm except at the position where the service penetrates
the furnace unless the application being evaluated requires the service or enclosure to
be in contact or in close proximity to the slab (e.g., three-sided exposure).
(g) The specimen shall incorporate access panels if appropriate to the system.
(h) For safety requirements temperature measurements on services shall be taken on (non
active) service(s), which shall be representative of the active services being tested.
For enclosed systems, these services shall be placed within the enclosure and shall
have a minimum length of 500 mm. For coated systems, these services shall be coated
in the same manner as and fixed alongside the active services and shall have a
minimum length of 500 mm.
NOTE: For other services, representative configurations should be selected.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
(c) Thermocouples complying with Clause 2.2.4 shall be positioned on each non-active
service on the upper and lower surfaces, at the quarter and mid-span positions as
shown in Figure 12.2 and at any other positions considered to have the potential for
higher heat transfer.
For additional information, the internal temperatures of an enclosure may be
measured at the quarter and mid-span positions and at any other positions considered
to have the potential for higher heat transfer using thermocouples complying with
Clause 2.2.3.
12.4 PRINCIPLE
A specimen is placed in a furnace, and exposed to the standard time-temperature heating
regime (or other regime as selected) and pressure conditions in order to determine the
ability of the system to operate at design capacity under fire conditions.
12.5 PROCEDURE
The procedure shall be as follows:
(a) Mount the test specimens on the slab, forming the roof of the furnace.
(b) Activate services at least 5 min before the commencement of the test if required to be
operational during the test.
(c) Operate furnace in accordance with the test procedures of Section 2.
(d) Record the performance of the protection system and service(s) under test at intervals
of no more than 1 min.
(e) The test may be terminated, subject to agreement between the testing authority and
the test sponsor.
TABLE 12.6
THERMAL FAILURE CRITERIA
Critical temperature,
Service
°C
Steel pipe at design capacity (with pressure relief) 550
Copper pipe at design capacity (with pressure relief) 250
PVC insulated/PVC sheathed power cables at design capacity 75 (see Note)
NOTE: Refer to cable rating for continuous use
TABLE 12.7
TYPICAL RESULTS TO BE REPORTED
Average
Time to Max temp.
Heating temperature Mode of
Service Design capacity operational at failure,
regime to at failure, failure
failure, min °C
°C
1 Cable AS 1530.4 240V/0.25A 90 130 135 Service
2 Steel pipes AS 1530.4 Ambient capacity 120 53 600 Service
APPENDIX A
RADIANT HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENTS
(Informative)
A1 SCOPE
This Appendix provides guidelines on the use of measurements of radiant heat flux emitted
by an element of construction that undergoes the fire-resistance test.
A2 GENERAL
In a fire, radiant heat emitted from the unexposed face of an element of construction can
cause the ignition of combustible materials in the vicinity.
The insulation criteria of the fire resistance test would ensure that radiant heat flux levels
would be below those necessary to ignite combustible materials or to cause burns to humans
in the vicinity. However, with uninsulated elements radiant heat flux levels may be unsafe
for humans and could ignite combustible materials in the vicinity.
The measurement of radiant heat flux during the test provides information on the likely
intensity of the emitted radiant heat flux during a fire and enables safe distances to be
calculated.
The theory presented in this Appendix assumes that the source of radiant heat is uniform in
intensity although this is seldom realized in practice. However, if the distance at which the
intensity of radiant heat measured in the test is similar to the distance of interest, a useful
approximation of the emitted flux can be obtained. If the non-uniformity of the source of
radiant heat is known or can be estimated, this can be incorporated in the calculations of
radiant heat.
The emitted radiant heat flux/time curve is applicable to the specimen during the test. This
curve will not necessarily relate to the time history of emitted radiant heat during a real fire.
Real fires have been shown to increase their temperature more rapidly than indicated by the
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
standard time-temperature curve. The most appropriate value for calculations would
normally be the value at the end of the rating period.
Alternatively, if what is needed is to limit to a safe value the received radiant heat flux, a
safe distance can be evaluated at which the configuration factor will yield sufficient
attenuation of the emitted radiant heat flux.
Typical radiant heat flux intensities to cause various phenomena are tabulated in Table A3.
TABLE A3
TYPICAL RADIANT HEAT INTENSITIES FOR VARIOUS PHENOMENA
Phenomena kW/m 2
Maximum for indefinite exposure for humans
4
Pain after 10 s to 20 s
Pain after 3 s 10
Piloted ignition of cotton fabric after a long time 13
Piloted ignition of timber after a long time 13
Non-piloted ignition of cotton fabric after a long time 25
Non-piloted ignition of timber after a long time 25
Non-piloted ignition of gaberdine fabric after a long time 27
Non-piloted ignition of black drill fabric after a long time 38
Non-piloted ignition of cotton fabric after 5 s 42
Non-piloted ignition of timber in 20 s 45
Non-piloted ignition of timber in 10 s 55
A4 CONFIGURATION FACTOR
Means for calculating the configuration factor for a specific situation are outlined in Heat
Transfer by Radiation by J H McGuire, DSIR FOC HMSO Special Report No. 2 1953. Two
special cases are as follows:
(a) Circular source with receiver on axis of source and with plane of receiver and source
parallel—
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
R2
φ= . . . A4(1)
R2 + D 2
where
φ = configuration factor
R = radius of source
D = distance between source and receiver
(b) Rectangular source with receiver on centre-line of source and with plane of receiver
parallel to plane of source—
2 W H H W
φ= tan −1 + tan −1 . . . A4(2)
π
(W 2
+ 4D 2 ) (W 2
− 4D 2 ) (H 2
+ 4D 2 ) (H 2
+ 4D 2 )
where
φ = configuration factor
W = width of source
H = height of source
D = distance between source and receiver
TABLE A5
FACTOR C FOR USE IN THE DETERMINATION OF SAFE DISTANCE
Factor C
Configuration
Aspect ratio
factor
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
0.001 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8
0.002 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6
0.003 10.2 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3
0.004 8.82 8.88 8.89 8.89 8.89 8.89 8.89 8.91 8.91 8.91
0.005 7.88 7.93 7.94 7.95 7.95 7.95 7.96 7.96 7.96 7.96
0.006 7.16 7.23 7.25 7.25 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.26 7.27 7.27
0.007 6.62 6.68 6.70 6.71 6.71 6.72 6.72 6.72 6.72 6.72
0.008 6.17 6.24 6.26 6.26 6.28 6.28 6.28 6.28 6.28 6.28
0.009 5.80 5.87 5.89 5.90 5.91 5.91 5.92 5.92 5.92 5.92
0.010 5.50 5.56 5.59 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.61 5.61 5.61 5.61
0.020 3.78 3.88 3.92 3.93 3.94 3.94 3.94 3.94 3.94 3.94
0.030 3.00 3.13 3.17 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.21 3.21
0.040 2.53 2.67 2.71 2.74 2.75 2.75 2.76 2.76 2.76 2.76
0.050 2.20 2.35 2.40 2.43 2.44 5.45 2.45 2.45 2.46 2.46
0.060 1.95 2.12 2.17 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 2.23 2.23 2.23
0.007 1.76 1.93 1.99 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.05 2.05 2.05
0.080 1.60 1.78 1.85 1.87 1.89 1.90 1.90 1.91 1.91 1.91
0.090 1.47 1.66 1.72 1.75 1.77 1.78 1.78 1.79 1.79 1.79
0.100 1.35 1.55 1.62 1.65 1.67 1.68 1.68 1.69 1.69 1.69
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
0.200 0.75 0.94 1.02 1.07 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12
0.300 0.50 0.66 0.75 0.79 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.86
0.400 0.36 0.49 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.68 0.68
0.500 0.27 0.38 0.45 0.49 0.52 0.54 0.55 0.55 0.56 0.56
0.600 0.21 0.29 0.35 0.39 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.45
0.700 0.16 0.23 0.27 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.36
0.800 0.12 0.17 0.20 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28
0.900 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
APPENDIX B
ALTERNATIVE AND ADDITIONAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR ELEMENTS OF
CONSTRUCTION
(Informative)
B1 SCOPE
This Appendix provides alternative heating conditions and other procedures, which may
need to be adopted to evaluate the performance of elements of construction under fire
conditions when specified by the applicant. It should be read in conjunction with Section 2.
In circumstances where the alternative and additional test procedures for elements of
construction are applicable, the procedures set out in this Appendix should be adopted and
read in conjunction with this Standard.
The additional procedures contained in this Appendix fall into the following categories:
(a) Alternate heating regimes/exposure conditions.
(b) Additional measurements to provide data to assess compliance with other Standards
and/or provide data for fire safety engineering purposes.
(c) Supplementary test methods.
based on earlier international work dating from the early 20th century. Therefore there is a
very large existing database of results and experience in the use of the results.
It is widely recognized that the standard heating regime specified in AS 1530.4/ISO 834 is
not necessarily directly applicable to modern buildings. It should be noted that the recorded
FRLs expressed as the time to failure under the relevant criteria do not bear a direct
relationship to the failure times in real fires. However, the standard heating regime has
provided a means of ranking fire-resistant elements of construction for regulatory purposes
and the FRLs prescribed in the BCA and earlier building regulations.
The implementation of the BCA 1996 permitted alternative solutions (commonly referred to
as performance-based solutions) to be accepted in lieu of the traditional prescriptive
(deemed-to-satisfy) approaches. This has created a demand for the performance of elements
of construction to be predicted when exposed to conditions other than the standard heating
regime specified in AS 1530.4 in order to demonstrate compliance of alternate solutions
with the BCA. Fire testing following an alternate heating regime is an appropriate means of
demonstrating compliance but it is important that the tests are performed in a controlled and
repeatable manner.
By specifying ‘standard’ alternate heating regimes and test methods it is more likely that
test data will be able to be correctly applied to a wider range of projects reducing the need
for repeated testing on a project by project basis and thus providing efficiencies to the
building industry.
Since the use of alternate solutions is optional and methods of demonstrating compliance
are subject to approval by the relevant regulatory authorities, this Appendix has been
classified as informative.
An idealized time/temperature curve for the enclosure of fire origin is shown in
Figure B2(A). For simplicity, the fire can be characterized into the following phases:
(a) Establishment phase—slow heating where radiative feedback from the hot layer is
relatively low (typically below 200°C). The period of the establishment phase can
vary from less than 1 min to several hours depending upon fuel and ignition sources,
enclosure size, etc. Most fires will never progress beyond the establishment phase due
to self-extinguishment/manual or automatic fire suppression. The slow heating
establishment phase fire may be adopted to assess barriers under these conditions
(b) Rapid growth phase—typically where radiative feedback increases rapidly which if
the fire progresses unchecked may quickly lead to flashover (the transition from a
localized fire to general conflagration within the compartment when all fuel surfaces
are burning).
(c) Fully developed phase—general conflagration within the compartment when all fuel
surfaces are burning
(d) Decay phase—commonly defined as the period when the average enclosure
temperature has decreased to 80% of its peak.
The standard fire resistance test heating regime and/or the hydrocarbon heating regime may
be used to provide data to assess the performance of barriers during the rapid growth, fully
developed and decay phases.
The Hydrocarbon and slow heating regimes specified in this Appendix are shown in
Figure B2(B).
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
NOTE: The hydrocarbon heating regime is based on EN 1363.2; however, the equivalent regimes for slow
heating/external exposure specified in EN 1363 Part 2 were not considered appropriate or consistent with the
BCA and Australian building/design practices for the particular applications. Therefore, more appropriate
regimes have been specified.
B3 ADDITIONAL MEASUREMENTS
Requirements for the following additional measurements are included
(a) Radiant heat from the non-fire-exposed face of specimens.
(b) Radiant heat exposure measurements during fire-resistance tests.
(c) Furnace plate thermocouple measurements for compatibility with ISO 834.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
B5 HYDROCARBON CURVE
B5.1 General
Section 2 defines the heating conditions, in terms of a specified temperature-time
relationship, for the determination of fire resistance.
It is recognized that, whilst the heating conditions specified are related to those occurring in
real fires, it is not the intent to define an ‘average’ fire for universal application but
generally to rank elements of construction for regulatory purposes. In some practical cases
it is possible to identify scenarios where significant variation from the standard conditions
could exist.
One such example is in the petrochemical and offshore oil industries where there is a threat
of exposure to very intense fires such as liquid pool fires or well-insulated buildings
containing modern furnishings. Such fires are characterized by higher temperatures and a
rapid rate of growth.
Where there is an identified requirement for such a fire exposure, the following
hydrocarbon curve should be considered.
NOTE: If a form of construction has been tested to the hydrocarbon and standard heating regimes,
it may be possible to model the performance of the barrier to enable interpolation of results for
intermediate exposure conditions.
Many modern fully developed fires in buildings and industrial applications are
characterized by a very rapid growth to temperatures significantly higher than those
specified for the standard fire resistance test. The times to failure from the fire resistance
test cannot therefore be applied directly to time lines for fire scenarios when evaluating an
alternative solution. Since heat transfer during a fully developed fire is likely to be
predominately by radiation and will, therefore, vary approximately in proportion to
temperature to the power four, substantial reductions in performance of elements of
construction would be expected. In addition some elements of construction may be
susceptible to thermal shock.
The hydrocarbon heating curve has been included to provide a means for the evaluation of
elements of construction under more rapid heating conditions.
B5.2 Expression of temperature-time curve
A temperature-time curve to be designated as the hydrocarbon curve is to be defined by the
following expression:
[
T = 1080 1 − 0.325e −0.167 t − 0.675e −2.5t + 20] . . . B5(1)
where
t = time from start of test, in minutes
T = average required furnace temperature, in degrees centigrade
See Figure B2(B).
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
B5.3 Tolerances
The percentage deviation (de) in the area of the curve of the average temperature recorded
by the specified furnace thermocouples versus time from the area of the specified
temperature-time curve should be within—
(a) 15% .....................................................................................................for 5 < t < 10.
(b) (15 – 0.5 (t-10))%...............................................................................for 10 < t < 30.
(c) (5 − 0.083 (t-30))%.............................................................................for 30 < t < 60.
(d) 2.5% ......................................................................................................... for t > 60.
where
A − AS . . . B5(2)
de × 100
AS
de = percentage deviation
A = area under the actual furnace temperature-time curve
A S = area under the specified temperature-time curve
t = time, in minutes
All areas are to be computed by the same method, that is, by the summation of areas at
intervals not exceeding 1 min and should be calculated from time zero.
At any time after the first 10 min of test, the temperature recorded by any thermocouple in
the furnace should not differ from the corresponding temperature of the specified
temperature-time curve by more than 100ºC.
For test specimens that burn rapidly, a deviation in excess of 100ºC above the specified
temperature/time curve may be exceeded for a period not in excess of 10 min provided that
such excess deviation is clearly identified as being associated with the sudden ignition of
significant quantities of combustible materials increasing the gas temperature in the
furnace.
B5.4 Expression of results
The fire performance determined when exposed to the hydrocarbon fire should be expressed
in a statement as follows:
‘Fire performance of the building element when exposed to hydrocarbon curve—
(a) structural adequacy xx minutes;
(b) integrity yy minutes; and
(c) insulation zz minutes.
NOTE: An alternate heating regime to the standard heating regime specified in Section 2 has
been adopted. The results above should not be used as evidence of performance when subjected to
the standard heating regime.
All areas are to be computed by the same method, that is, by the summation of areas at
intervals not exceeding 1 min and are to be calculated from time zero.
At any time after the first 10 min of test, the temperature recorded by any thermocouple in
the furnace should not differ from the corresponding temperature of the specified
temperature-time curve by more than 100ºC.
The performance determined when exposed to the establishment phase fire is to be
expressed in terms contained in Paragraph B3.4.
B6.4 Expression of results
The fire performance determined when exposed to the slow heating establishment phase fire
for barrier systems should be expressed in a statement as follows:
‘Fire performance of the building element when exposed to slow heating establishment
phase fire for barrier systems—
(a) structural adequacy xx minutes; and
(b) integrity yy minutes; and
(c) insulation zz minutes.’
NOTE: An alternate heating regime to the standard heating regime specified in Section 2 has
been adopted. The results above should not be used as evidence of performance when subjected to
the standard heating regime.
external face is to be insulated by 25 mm thick ceramic fibre blanket. The steel sheet
is to be stiffened to prevent excessive distortion.
(b) An insulated test frame to house a representative section of wall at least 3 m × 3 m
constructed in accordance with Section 3 but with a central mounting provided for a
radiometer to measure the incident radiation at approximately the centre of the
specimen.
(c) Shielding panels to prevent exposure of personnel to radiant heat.
B7.3 Instrumentation
B7.3.1 Furnace temperature measurements
The furnace temperature is to be measured using Type K thermocouples as prescribed in
Section 2.
B7.3.2 Furnace pressure measurements
The furnace pressure need not be measured since it is not a critical component of the test.
B7.3.3 Specimen temperatures
Surface temperatures on the non-fire side of each specimen are to be measured in
accordance with Section 3.
B7.4.3 Observations
Temperature data and the radiant heat flux should be recorded at a maximum of 60 s
intervals to the levels of accuracy as defined in this Standard and ISO 834.
Any significant visible event is to be recorded.
B7.4.4 Exposure conditions
The heat flux is to be agreed between the laboratory and the applicant prior to
commencement of the test. The levels given in Table B7.4.4 have been extracted from the
BCA for a building element at a specified distance from a boundary or another building on
the same allotment.
TABLE B7.4.4
HEAT FLUX
Location Heat flux (kW/m 2 )
On boundary 80
1 m from boundary 40
3 m from boundary 20
6 m from boundary 10
0 m between buildings 80
2 m between buildings 40
6 m between buildings 20
12 m between buildings 10
At the commencement of the test the plate thermometers should be 100 ±50 mm from the
exposed face of the test construction and they should be maintained at this distance during
the test, as far as possible.
The method of support should ensure that plate thermometers do not fall away or become
dislodged during the test.
At the commencement of the test, the furnace is to include at least the number of plate
thermometers (n) that are required by the specific test method. If plate thermometers fail so
that they are n − 1 in the furnace, then the laboratory need take no action. If the number
falls below n − 1 during the test then the laboratory is to replace these to ensure that at least
n − 1 are present.
Plate thermometers are resistant to damage but are subject to damage by falling debris and
deteriorate in continued use, becoming slightly less sensitive with age. Before every test
they are to be inspected and checked for proper operation. If there is any evidence of
damage, deterioration or improper operation, they should not be used and should be
replaced.
The support for the plate thermometers should not penetrate or be attached to the specimen
unless the specific requirements for the position of the measuring junction cannot otherwise
be ensured. If the support for the measuring junction has penetrated or been attached to the
specimen, it is to be arranged so as to have minimal effect on the behaviour of the specimen
in relation to the relevant failure criteria or the supplementary information being
determined.
The specimen should be subjected to the standard heating regime set out in this Standard
with a positive pressure differential maintained between the furnace enclosure and
laboratory of approximately 8 Pa after the first 5 min of the test.
Observations should be taken during the test to facilitate the assessment of variations from
tested prototypes. Particular attention should be paid to observe the performance against the
relevant performance criteria of this Standard.
APPENDIX C
GUIDELINES FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF SPECIMEN THERMOCOUPLES
(Informative)
C1 INTERNAL THERMOCOUPLES
C1.1 General
Where information is required about the temperatures reached by individual components or
parts of a specimen within its construction, thermocouples of the appropriate type and
design, to suit the type of measurement to be made, should be chosen.
C1.2 Specification
Internal thermocouples for measuring cavity temperatures within test specimens or of
temperatures within materials such as concrete, steel, timber, etc., should be made from
double glass-fibre-insulated bare wire with wires of diameter 0.5 mm and crimped or
welded junctions. The wires should remain insulated as close as possible to the junction.
Any bare wires should be kept as far apart as possible to minimize electrolytic effects. They
should be used once only.
C1.3 Fixing methods and positioning
Appropriate methods should be adopted for fixing the measuring junctions securely to the
components or the construction so that the thermal behaviour is not greatly disturbed.
For example, a junction can be peened to a heavy metal section by drilling a hole in the
section only slightly larger in diameter than the thermocouple junction and deep enough to
accommodate the junction below the surface. The junction may be inserted into the hole and
burred over the edge of the hole with a punch to retain the wires in position. Alternatively,
the hot junction may be welded to the section.
A similar junction may be attached to small metal components, such as screws or wires, by
wrapping the tail around the component. In these applications the first contact between the
pair of thermocouple wires has to be close to the surface whose temperature is being
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
measured. The thermal contact can be improved by applying a little solder, which will
remain effective even at temperatures above its melting point.
The thermal contact may be made by inserting the junction and the insulated leads into a
hole with a suitable material of similar properties. Junctions and their leads may also be
cast in to materials such as concrete.
The wires from the junctions should, where possible, be taken along an isotherm for a
distance of at least 50 mm and then to the outside of the specimen in such a way that they
do not experience temperatures higher then the hot junction. There should be no joint or
junction made in the wires until they emerge from the specimen.
The thermocouple wires should be protected against—
(a) excessive temperature rise;
(b) condensation;
(c) short circuiting by any aspect of the specimen construction or resulting from the
heating conditions of test; and
(d) damage resulting form the deformation of the specimen during the test.
give an adequate bond. There should be a sufficient lapse of time between the bonding of
the thermocouples and the test for stable moisture conditions to be attained in the case of
the ceramic adhesive and evaporation of the solvent in the case of the contact adhesive.
C2.2.2 Steel
The insulating pad with the thermocouple fitted should be bonded to the cleaned surface of
the steel using water-based ceramic cement produced by mixing the components to form a
high-temperature-resistant adhesive. The adhesive should be of such a consistency that no
mechanical aid is necessary for retention purposes during the drying process. Where
difficulty in bonding is experienced, retention by adhesive tape may be employed provided
the tape is removed sufficiently long in advance of the test to allow complete drying of the
adhesive. Care is required in the removal of the tape to ensure that the insulating pad is not
damaged. If the thermocouple pad is damaged when the tape is removed, then the
thermocouple should be replaced.
C2.2.3 Mineral wool
The thermocouples with insulating pads fitted should be arranged in such a way that if a
surface wire mesh is present it may aid retention, and in all cases the bond to the fibrous
surface should be made using a contact adhesive. The nature of the adhesive necessitates a
drying time before mating surfaces are put together thus avoiding the need for external
pressure.
APPENDIX D
ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS CABLES
(Informative)
DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETRES
APPENDIX E
TEST PROGRAM FOR SEALING SYSTEMS PROTECTING METAL PIPE
PENETRATIONS
(Informative)
The following test program is recommended for use for sealing systems protecting metal
pipe penetrations of various materials wall thickness and outside diameter (OD):
(a) Service A Copper pipe, nominal diameter 150 mm, actual OD 152.4 mm and wall
thickness 1.63 mm, or nominal diameter 200 mm, actual OD 203.2 mm and wall
thickness 2.03 mm.
(b) Service B Brass pipe, nominal diameter 100 mm, actual OD 101.65 mm, wall
thickness 1.22 mm.
(c) Service C Brass pipe, nominal diameter 32 mm, actual OD 31.75 mm, wall thickness
0.91 mm.
(d) Service D Copper pipe, nominal diameter 32 mm, actual OD 31.75 mm, wall
thickness 0.91 mm (only required if the insulation criterion has not been waived).
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
APPENDIX F
FIRE-RESISTANT DOORSETS
(Informative)
F1 TESTING IN ADVANCE
Where an application is to be made to a regulatory authority for approval to use fire-
resistant doorsets of a particular design for the protection of openings in walls, the
specimen doorset should be tested in a wall agreed in advance by a registered testing
authority as being indicative of the doorset’s potential when ultimately mounted in its
intended location.
F3 PILOT TESTS
For pilot tests, where the purpose of the test is to validate a variation, the direction of fire
exposure and the specimen mounting may differ from the provisions at full scale. In each
instance the mounting and direction may be arranged to gather data needed for the
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
validation, subject to each feature under examination for the least favourable conditions.
APPENDIX G
REVIEW OF AS 1530.4—1997
(Informative)
G1 GENERAL
The review of AS 1530.4 for this edition considered many factors and issues including
development of international Standards, such as ISO 834, and the referencing of AS 1530.4
in the BCA.
The following information was included in the Public comment Draft, DR 04100, issued on
18 February 2004 and is included for information and future reference.
of 10 years. The European Community has not adopted ISO 834 but has published its own
suite of similar Standards. There has been and is substantial ongoing debate on some of the
content of ISO 834 and the European Standards, for example, the plate thermocouples. It is
therefore considered prudent to publish a revision of AS 1530.4 now to address a range of
issues and gain substantial benefits whilst working with the international community
towards a next generation ISO 834 Standard that is universally adopted. This has always
been the intention of Committee FP-018.
G2.3 Technical barriers to trade
The revised edition of AS 1530.4 is closely aligned with ISO 834, the plate thermometers
referred to Paragraph G.2.2 above being the exception, and European Standards.
Imported products can be approved by the adoption of an alternative solution, which,
therefore, provides no restraint of trade. The greater alignment will simplify the assessment
of products tested overseas as having been tested to an equivalent or more severe standard
facilitating use as a deemed-to-satisfy solution.
For Australian manufacturers, the greater alignment with ISO and European Standards will
enable many elements of construction to be simultaneously tested to ISO, European and
Australian Standards and also enable products to be developed for the local market that are
compatible with international markets.
The revision of AS 1530.4 will significantly assist international trade whilst work
progresses with ISO TC92 on the next revision of the ISO 834 and test methods.
Standards Australia www.standards.com.au
153 AS 1530.4—2005
The fire door industry is represented through the FPAA and other organisations on FP-018.
They are therefore aware of the proposed changes. Additional views will be sought during
the public comment stage but it is understood that most fire door manufacturers have
evaluated some door designs already using the cotton pad test for international markets and
therefore the impact will not be substantial.
TABLE G1
SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE REVISED
AS 1530.4—1997
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
General AS 1530.4 has retained a single Lower production costs Increase in price of
document format unlike making AS 1530.4 cheaper to the Standard due to its
ISO/European Standards that purchase for all users and larger size. However,
publish approximately 10 reduces the risk of a part of this represents a
Standards to cover the same the Standard being unavailable fraction of the cost of
material; however, the page to a user when required. the ISO suite of
numbers of AS 1530.4 have Improved clarity and Standards
increased to reflect additional repeatability due to more
types of construction and include detailed specification of the
more detailed specification of the method. Greater application to
method and permissible newer forms of construction
variations such as suspended ceilings
and critical services. Advice
on application of results will
assist builders, installers and
certifiers to achieve cost-
effective and safe construction
1.7.1(f) Better definition of incipient Correct specification None
ceiling. maintains required levels of
protection and/or prevents
There has been confusion in the
unnecessary expenditure
industry as to when an incipient
spread of fire ceiling is required,
leading to incorrect specification
for compliance with the BCA
1.10 Safety precautions have been Clear advice to laboratories None
clearly identified and people that attend
laboratories on potential
hazards leading to improved
safety
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
TABLE G1 (continued)
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
2.6 Inclusion of cotton pad test to be Consistent method of judging Potentially slightly
consistent with international integrity performance of all less onerous for most
Standards and provide an elements of construction elements since a very
appropriate method for assessing small through-gap
the risk of fire spread due to may not cause ignition
integrity failure. of a cotton pad. The
impact on industry
Current and previous editions of Clearer specification of and life safety due to
AS 1530.4 did not give clear integrity failure criteria this relaxation is
advice on assessing integrity leading to consistent expected to be
performance, which has led to application/interpretation minimal. The criteria
different interpretations being
is more onerous for
applied by laboratories. This was
doorsets but the fire
partially addressed by AS 4072.1.
protection industry is
General interpretation applied by Greater consistency with
aware of proposed
local labs has been any size international Standards
changes. Public
straight through gap constitutes facilitating international trade
comment will provide
failure except for doorsets where
an opportunity for
6 × 150 mm gap criteria are
comment if there are
applied except at sill level. This
any perceived
approach is inconsistent within
Benefits of the change are problems
the Standard as well as with
international Standards expected to outweigh the
potential negative impact
TABLE G1 (continued)
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
2.12 Criteria of failure: Limiting Improved repeatability of None
deflections and rates introduced testing for structural adequacy
for consistent assessment of
Structural Adequacy in line with
international Standards.
See Clause 2.6 for introduction of
cotton pad test for integrity
Clarification of failure criteria for Clear specification of None
radiation, which required radiation criteria in one place
reference to BCA and AS 1530.4
and some interpretation to
ascertain with current edition.
2.13 Example of expression of results Improved clarity and None
that include radiation added consistency of reporting to
facilitate use of reports by
practitioners
2.15 Reporting of results. More Manufacturers receive detailed None
guidance provided plus inclusion information for future use in
of the short form report and test reports but can obtain a
certificate requirements together short form (abridged) report,
with appropriate applications. which can be used as evidence
Currently the use of reports, short of compliance with prescribed
form reports and certificates are FRLs allowing a more
not clear in the industry which efficient regulatory
has contributed to regulatory compliance assessment, which
authorities not obtaining is expected to raise the level
sufficient documentation to of compliance and reduce
assess compliance as required by paperwork
A2.3 of the BCA. A full report is
required to be provided to the
sponsor. The short form report
contains the minimum
information required as evidence
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
TABLE G1 (continued)
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
Section 4 More detailed description of Greater consistency between None
method of test for floors roofs laboratories
and ceilings
Use of standard thermocouples in The failure criteria is None
lieu of thermocouples attached to unchanged; however, the
timber blocks and modification of determination of incipient
incipient spread of fire criteria spread has been modified to
for failure to simplify test improve repeatability
procedures
Inclusion of permissible Greater efficiency of None
variations regulatory assessment
removing uncertainty leading
to cost savings
Inclusion of Clause 4.3.9 for Potentially substantial savings None
ceiling systems for protection of in the cost of construction
structural members. This without reducing fire safety
approach is used extensively
overseas for protecting beams in
a cost-effective manner and has
been adopted for some alternate
solutions but the adoption has
been restricted due to the lack of
systems with proven performance
Sections 5 Beams/columns—Minimal None None
and 6 changes
Section 7 Greater detailed description of Greater consistency between None
method of test for doorsets. laboratories
Inclusion of permissible Greater efficiency of None
variations extracted from regulatory assessment
AS 1905.1 removing uncertainty leading
to cost savings
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
TABLE G1 (continued)
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
Section 9 The test specification has been Greater consistency between None
clarified laboratories
An internal airflow has been Greater consistency between None
specified for ducts under external laboratories and more efficient
fire conditions to simulate a duct designs
supply air application. This
approach had been adopted on an
ad-hoc basis leading to
differences in reporting
requirements and result
interpretations
Section 10 Greater detailed description of Greater consistency between None
method of test for service laboratories
penetrations and control joints
and consolidation of material
from AS 4072.1
Inclusion of permissible Greater efficiency of
variations and standard regulatory assessment leading
configurations from AS 4072.1 to cost savings
Section 11 The fire damper and air transfer Facilitates the development Existing test data
grilles test methods have been and approval of innovative cannot be directly
substantially changed and aligned devices in addition to assessed against the
with ISO test methods in such a traditional mechanical designs new test method;
way that similar criteria apply to however, the BCA
both intumescent, mechanical and permits old test data
combination devices to be used
indefinitely,
minimizing the cost
penalty. The impact
can be further reduced
by a phase-in period
to give manufacturers
the opportunity to
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
TABLE G1 (continued)
Potential negative
Clause Description/Reason Benefit
impact
Section 12 A new section has been provided The resulting classification of None
for the protection of critical critical services will depend
services. This has been added on the actual properties of the
because applications occur where material being protected and is
services need to carry out a consistent with a performance-
critical function during a fire based building code approach.
emergency. These are quite The provision of the test
common when major method will facilitate the
refurbishments are being evaluation of protection
undertaken as well in as new systems providing cost
buildings. A simple specification effective solutions
of construction having an FRL of
Consistent approaches will be None
120/120/120 is not adequate since
adopted by laboratories
services may be susceptible to
allowing solutions to be
slightly elevated temperatures
confidently specified by
and, therefore, a test procedure is
designers and approved by
required
regulatory authorities
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AS 1428.1 Design for access and mobility, Part 1: General requirements for
access—New building work
AS 1720.4 Timber structures, Part 4: Fire resistance of structural timber
members
AS 1735.11 Lifts, escalators and moving walks, Part 11: Fire rated landing doors
AS 3600 Concrete structures
AS 3700 Masonry structures
AS 4100 Steel structures
AS 5000.1 Electric cable—Polymeric insulated, Part 1: For working voltages up
to and including 0.6/1 kV
AS/NZS 1530.7 Methods for fire tests on building material, components and
structures, Part 7: Smoke control door and shutter assemblies—
Ambient and medium test leakage procedure
AS/NZS 1668.1 The use of ventilation and airconditioning in buildings, Part 1: Fire
and smoke control in multi-compartment buildings
DIN EN 1362.1 Identification card systems—Device interface characteristics—
Classes of device interfaces, Part 1: Alternative and additional
procedures
ISO 834 Fire-resistance tests—Elements of building construction
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
www.standards.org.au
Australian Standards
Australian Standards are prepared by committees of experts from industry, governments, consumers
and other relevant sectors. The requirements or recommendations contained in published Standards are
a consensus of the views of representative interests and also take account of comments received from
other sources. They reflect the latest scientific and industry experience. Australian Standards are kept
under continuous review after publication and are updated regularly to take account of changing
technology.
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007
International Involvement
Standards Australia is responsible for ensuring that the Australian viewpoint is considered in the
formulation of international Standards and that the latest international experience is incorporated in
national Standards. This role is vital in assisting local industry to compete in international markets.
Standards Australia represents Australia at both ISO (The International Organization
for Standardization) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
Electronic Standards
All Australian Standards are available in electronic editions, either downloaded individually from our web
site, or via On-Line and DVD subscription services. For more information phone 1300 65 46 46 or visit
Standards Web Shop at
www.standards.com.au
Accessed by SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY on 23 Aug 2007