0% found this document useful (0 votes)
478 views25 pages

LSM Beam Design

The document discusses limit state design of reinforced concrete beams in flexure. It describes three limit states: balanced, under-reinforced, and over-reinforced. For a balanced beam, the concrete and steel reach their limit states simultaneously. For an under-reinforced beam, the steel yields first, resulting in a ductile failure. For an over-reinforced beam, the concrete crushes first, resulting in a brittle failure. Design equations are provided to calculate the balanced reinforcement ratio.

Uploaded by

Pranav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
478 views25 pages

LSM Beam Design

The document discusses limit state design of reinforced concrete beams in flexure. It describes three limit states: balanced, under-reinforced, and over-reinforced. For a balanced beam, the concrete and steel reach their limit states simultaneously. For an under-reinforced beam, the steel yields first, resulting in a ductile failure. For an over-reinforced beam, the concrete crushes first, resulting in a brittle failure. Design equations are provided to calculate the balanced reinforcement ratio.

Uploaded by

Pranav
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Limit State Design of

Reinforced Concrete Beam


Limit State in Flexure: Brittle & Ductile Failure

Fracture

Fracture
stress

strain
Limit State in Flexure: Brittle & Ductile Failure

 Balanced Section
Concrete and steel reach their respective limit
state simultaneously.
Concrete and steel fail at the same time.

 Under-reinforced Section
Steel reach its limit state first. Ductile failure.

 Over-reinforced Section
Concrete reach its limit state first. Brittle failure.
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA (lever arm)
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA (lever arm)
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es

0.002 xu 4
x2   xu
0.0035 7
3
x1  xu  x2  xu
7
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA (lever arm)
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es
3 xu
0.002 xu 4 C1  0.446 f ck  b   0.191 f ck bxu
x2   xu 7
0.0035 7
3 4 xu 2
x1  xu  x2  xu C2  0.446 f ck  b    0.170 f ck bxu
7 7 3
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA (lever arm)
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es
3 xu
0.002 xu 4 C1  0.446 f ck  b   0.191 f ck bxu
x2   xu 7
0.0035 7
3 4 xu 2
x1  xu  x2  xu C2  0.446 f ck  b    0.170 f ck bxu
7 7 3

Total Compression C  C1  C2  0.36 f ck bxu a  0.416 xu

Total Tension T  (0.87 f y )  Ast


Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
D NA d–a
T Lever arm
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
D NA d–a
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es

Compatibility Equation
xu 0.0035

d  xu 0.002  0.87 f y / Es
fy (E = 200GPa) xu /d
250 0.53
415 0.48
500 0.46
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
D NA d–a
T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es

Compatibility Equation Equilibrium Condition: T = C


xu 0.0035 0.87 f y Ast  0.36 f ck xu b

d  xu 0.002  0.87 f y / Es
A 0.36 f ck xu Ast
 st  pt  100
fy (E = 200GPa) xu /d bd 0.87 f y d bd
250 0.53
415 0.48  fy  xu
 pt    41.38
500 0.46  f ck  d
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA

T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es

C  0.36 f ck xu b

T  (0.87 f y ) Ast

 fy  xu
pt    41.38
 f ck  d

a  0.416 xu
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA

T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es Moment of Resistance
M u  C  d  a   T  d  a 
C  0.36 f ck xu b
Mu xu xu
 0.36 f ck (1  0.416 )
T  (0.87 f y ) Ast bd 2 d d
Fy xu /d Mu
 fy  xu
pt    41.38 250 0.53 0.149fckbd2
 f ck  d
415 0.48 0.138fckbd2
a  0.416 xu 500 0.46 0.133fckbd2
Balance, Under-reinforced & Over-reinforced
0.0035
fy xu,lim /d
250 0.53
xu,max xu
415 0.48
500 0.46
s = 0.87fy/Es + 0.002

Over reinforced
s < 0 Balance
Under reinforced

s = 0

s > 0
Limit State in Flexure: Balanced Section
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA

T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es Moment of Resistance
M u  C  d  a   T  d  a 
C  0.36 f ck xu b
Mu xu xu
 0.36 f ck (1  0.416 )
T  (0.87 f y ) Ast bd 2 d d
Fy Xu,lim /d Mu,lim
 fy  xu
pt    41.38 250 0.53 0.149fckbd2
 f ck  d
415 0.48 0.138fckbd2
a  0.416 xu 500 0.46 0.133fckbd2
Limit State in Flexure: Under-reinforced
b 0.446fck
0.0035
x1 x1 a
0.002 C=C1+C2
xu
d x2 x2
d–a
D NA

T
0.87 f y
 0.002
Ast Es Moment of Resistance
M u  C  d  a   T  d  a 
C  0.36 f ck xu b
Mu xu xu
 0.36 f ck (1  0.416 )
T  (0.87 f y ) Ast bd 2 d d

 fy  xu 1/ 2
pt    41.38 xu  6.68 M u 
 1.2  1.2  
2
 f ck  d
d f bd 2 
 ck 
a  0.416 xu
Limit State in Flexure: Example
(i) Check whether the following sections are under-
reinforced or over-reinforced. (ii) Determine the moment of
resistances. Use M25, Fe415 and effective cover 50mm.

2-12T
2-12T
Holder
2L-8T @ Holder 2L-8T @
bar 400
150c/c bar 300 150c/c
3-20T+2-16T
3-16T

250 300
Design for Shear
Beam in Shear: Diagonal Cracking

Diagonal compression Diagonal tension


Beam in Shear: Dowel Action

Longitudinal reinforcement
enhances shear resistance
Limit State in Shear: Design Shear Strength
Limit State in Shear
Vu
Nominal shear stress v 
d Clause 40.1,
bd
Vu IS456: 2000  c ,max
b Table 20,
IS456: 2000

c
v c No shear reinforcement required
(Minimum to be provided as per Clause 26.5.1.6 IS 456:2000)

v c Shear reinforcement to be designed for ( v   c )


Beam in Shear: Typical Shear Reinforcement
sv sv

(45O)
d

sv sv
d
Number of stirrups cut by a 45O crack line given by, N  d
Sv
Limit State in Shear: Maximum Shear Strength

2 Legged Stirrups (2L) 4 Legged Stirrups (4L)

( v   c )bd  N  (0.87 f y Asv ) 


Asv  2   2 for 2L
4
d 0.87 f y Asv 
N Sv  Asv  4   2 for 4L
Sv b( v   c ) 4
Limit State in Shear
Limit State in Shear: Example
Calculate shear reinforcement (vertical stirrups) needed for a
factored shear force (i) Vu = 200 kN (ii) Vu = 75 kN. Use
M25, Fe415 and effective cover 50mm.

2-12T
Holder
bar 500
3-25T

300

You might also like