THE IN HIGH COURT JUDICATURE AT
NEW DEHLI
APPEAL
U NDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 0F C0NSTITUTION OF
INDIA
ORDERL XI RUE 13READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CIVIL
PRODECURE CODE, 1908
IN THE MATTER OF
MUNISH KUMAR SINGLA TRADINGS AS CHAKSHU FOOD PRODUCTS
_ ________APPELLANT
v.
JOLLIBEE FOODS CORPORATION. __________
RESPONDENT
Appeal (civil) ---- of 2017
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE
APPELLANT
Most Respectf ully Submitt ed to the Hon’ble HIGH COURT
OF DELHI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS----------------------------------------------------- [3]
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES-------------------------------------------------- [4]
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION---------------------------------------- [5-11]
STATEMENT OF FACTS--------------------------------------------------- [12]
STATEMENT OF ISSUES---------------------------------------------------- [15]
ARGUMENTS----------------------------------------------------------- [16-21]
PRAYER---------------------------------------------------------------- [22]
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
ML.......................................Moh.Law
&............................................And
B/W........................................Between
Sec........................................Section
Ed.........................................Edition
Ltd........................................Limited
U/S........................................Under
Section Para......................................Paragraph
V..........................................versus
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
BOOKS
1. AQIL AHMED, “MOHAMMEDAN LAW”, (Revised by Prof. Iqbal
Ali Khan), Central Law Agency.
LINKS
https://indiankanoon.org
https://lawmantra.co.in
https://indiancaselaws.wordpress.com
CASES:
1)RashidAhmedv.AnisaKhatun,(1932)34BomL.R.475PC.
59I.A.21
2)Muhammad Allahdad Khan v Muhammad
Ismail,1LR(1987)10All.289
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The counsel on behalf of Plaintiff, in the matter of “S” vs. “S1” &
“D” have approaches the Hon’ble Family Court and would humbly
contest the grounds invoked under this.
The counsel on behalf of Plaintiff, most respectfully submits that
Hon’ble Family Court has the jurisdiction to hear the said matter
under and adjudge the substantive dispute herein.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
“A”asunnimuslim
diedleavingbehindtwosons‘S’and‘S1’andone
daughter‘D’werebornoutofthewedlockof‘A’andhiswife‘
W’.‘S’
filedasuitagainsthisyoungerbrother‘S1’andhissister‘D’.‘
S’
allegedthathewastheeldersonofthedeceasedfather‘A’an
d
claimedinheritancerightsinthepropertyleftbehindby‘A’.
the
defencewasthattheplaintiff‘S’wasonlythestepsonofthef
ather
havingbeenbornoftheirmotherbefore‘W’marriedtheirfa
ther,the
deceased.Theplaintiffcontendedthatevenifhefailedtopr
ovethat
hewasthesonofthedeceased,hehadbeenacknowledgeda
sson
bythedeceasedonseveraloccasions.hefiledcertainletters
alsoin
whichhehadbeenreferredashissonbythedeceased.There
were
noprohibitionsonmarriagebetween‘A’and‘W’.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
Whetheritwasavalidacknowledgementbydeceased“A”
&doShasarighttoinheritance?
STATEMENT OF ARGUMENTS
Whether it was a valid acknowledgement by deceased “A”& do S has
a Right to in inheritance?
Acknowledge her emeans a declaration ascertaining the paternity where,
Although the marriage exists but the child's paternity is doubtfull
because no
Direct proof of marriage. Anacknowledge need not be express, it may be
presumedfrom thefactthatonepersonhashabituallyandopenlytreated
anotherashislegitimatechild.Thechildmaybeasonoradaughter.Where
thepaternityofachild,i.e.itslegitimatedescentfrom itsfather,cannotbe
provedbyestablishingamarriagebetweenitsparentsatthetimeofits
conception orbirth,such marriage and legitimate descentmay be
establishedbyacknowledgement.
The Conditions of a valid acknowledgemen tunder muslim
lawandhowitcanbeapplicable
inthiscase
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, IN THE LIGHT OF FACTS STATED, ISSUES RAISED,
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED AND AUTHORITIES CITED, THE
RESPONDENT RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THIS HON’BLE COURT
TO ADJUDGE AND DECLARE THAT:
I. Allowed the appellant appeal.
II. The impugned order of trial court may kindly be quashed and
set aside.
III. Allowed the application under order 9 rule 13 of civil
procedure code.
IV. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble
Court consider just and proper in the facts and circumstances
of this case, may kindly be passed in favour of the respondent.
AND TO PASS ANY SUCH ORDER OR JUDGMENT AS THIS HON’BLE
COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, EQUITY AND
GOOD CONSCIENCE.
