See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/308419801

Study on Extradosed Bridge and It's Structural Behavior.

Conference Paper · December 2015

CITATION READS

1 1,808

4 authors, including:

Md Shahjalal Chowdhury
Boise State University
3 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Implementing AASHTO TP 110 for Alkali-Silica Reaction Potential Evaluation of Idaho Aggregates. Funded by: Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) View project

Reduction and Analysis of Pavement Profiler Data to Quantify the Bump at the End of the Bridge. Funded by:Federal Highway Administration - U.S. Department of
Transportation (FHWA) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Md Shahjalal Chowdhury on 22 September 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Paper ID: SE-006

International Conference on Recent Innovation in Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development

(IICSD-2015)
Department of Civil Engineering
DUET - Gazipur, Bangladesh

Study On Extradosed Bridge And It’s Structural Behavior

M. S. Chowdhury*1; M. M. Rahman2; Dr. M. M. Rahman3; and M. S. Rana4

Department of Civil Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
*Corresponding author

Abstract
The Extradosed pre-stress bridge concept is relatively new in the field of Structural and Bridge
Engineering. The first Extradosed Bridge was constructed by Japan in 1994. Since, it becomes a
unique type of structure for its advantages over other bridges. In this paper, detail study is carried
out on historical context, origin and structural behavior of Extradosed Bridge. Its basic structural
concept is, Cables anchored with box Girder increase the compressive force of girder and allows the
box girder to carry a huge load by work together with a very long span and lower tower height.
Third Karnaphuli Bridge is the first major Extradosed Bridge in Bangladesh crossing Karnaphuli
River, used as a reference structure for analysis of structural behavior. Model analysis methodology
has been used for conduct the research. Ten different prototype models as well as simple models has
been created and analyzed by analysis software STAAD PRO V8i. All section and dimension are
same for different models except the tower height. Equivalent sections of reference bridge girder are
used for generating prototype models and girder is considered as a solid beam instead of a hollow
section. Analysis of prototype models provides insight into how different physical parameters such
as tower height, girder depth and angle of cable influence the structural behavior of Extradosed
Bridge. It mainly implies the variation of the axial force of girder and cables for different tower
height and cable angle. Similarly, deflection of girder and cables are also associated with tower
height and cable angle. Simple models results are compared with prototype models results. Variation
of different parameter observed for simple models are almost identical to prototype models. Study
shows an optimum tower height ranges may be from 20m-25m is preferable for Extradosed Bridge.
In between this range maximum Axial force of Girder and Cables are noticed with an allowable
limit of Deflection.
.
Keywords: axial force, cable angle, deflection, extradosed bridge, stress, structural behavior,
tower height.

1. Introduction

Structural concept of different Structures and Bridges have been developed and observed from
the very beginning of Civil Engineering but the Extradosed Bridge concept is a new and exciting
development in the history of Structural Engineering as well as Bridge Engineering which open a
new era in this field. It is widely known that, Mathivat proposed the first concept of Extradosed
Bridge and his proposal inspired Japanese engineers. They constructed the Odawara Blueway
Bridge in 1994, which is considered as the first Extradosed Bridge in the world [2, 4]. Extradosed
Bridge is an intercrossed between Prestressed Girder Bridge and Cable-stayed Bridge. Because of
its advantageous structural function, special superiority in economy and architecture, Extradosed
Bridges have been successfully designed and constructed for several years in many countries of

1
M.S. Chowdhury, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Email- [Link]@[Link]
2
M. M. Rahman, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Email- rahmanmotiur11@[Link]
3
Dr. M. M. Rahman, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Email- mahmud402@[Link]
4
M. S. Rana, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Email- [Link]@[Link]

IICSD-2015 Page 1
the world. The previous studies identified 120 Extradosed Bridges in use, under construction, or
in the planning phase in different countries [4]. More than sixty Extradosed Bridges are
constructed in 26 different countries of the world. Japan is in the leading position, having 29
Extradosed Bridges. South Korea and Bolvia get second and third position with 5 and 3
Extradosed Bridges respectively. Bangladesh also constructed an Extradosed Bridge (Third
Karnaphuli Bridge) and enters in the new era of Bridge Engineering [1].

1.1 Purposes of the Dissertation

The Objectives and goals of this dissertation is to gain expand knowledge of Extradosed Bridge
and make some structural analysis of extradosed bridge such as analysis on tower height, cable
angle, deck section etc. for check whether they meet the typical range provided for Extradosed
Bridges. Analysis carried out for observe the variation of Girder and Cable axial force as well as
stress, and Deflection of girder and cable with the change of tower height is also an important
purpose of the paper.

1.2 Structural behavior of Extradosed Bridge

 An Extradosed Bridge implies in an intermediate zone between Cable Stayed Bridge and
Girder Bridge. So the structural behavior of Extradosed Bridge may be similar to these
kinds of Bridges.
 In Extradosed Bridge, the Bridge decks are prestressing internally as like as a normal
prestressed Girder Bridge or cable stayed Bridge. In addition to this, Cables are also used
as externally prestress cables. This two prestressing process act simultaneously and make
the Bridge deck stiffer and stronger that allows a long span and can carry a huge amount
of loads.
 Tower height of Extradosed Bridge is generally lower than the tower height of cable
stayed Bridge. For this lower tower height cables form a flatter angle with the deck of the
Bridge. Reduced cable inclination leads to an increase in the axial load in the deck and a
decrease in vertical component of force at the cable anchorages. Thus, one of the
important function of the Extradosed cables is to prestress the deck.
 Extradosed Bridge usually rely their load on only 20%-50% to cable, and remaining
portion is covered by the girder as it is more stiff than the stiffening girder in a cable-
stayed Bridge.

2. Modeling and Analysis

Ten different prototype models as well as simple models of the Bridge has been created and
analyzed through STAAD PRO V8i.

2.1 Steps of Bridge modeling

Important steps associated with modeling of Extradosed Bridge will describe briefly. At first the
required Nodes are arranged for developing the model. Three types of distance related with node
to node i.e. distance in X, Y & Z direction. As ours is 2-D model, so X and Y direction distances
are considered. Distances in X and Y direction for a node are provided with respect to first node
(where distances are 0, 0).There are 86 nodes used for forming a prototype model. Whole span,
cables, pier are denoted as beam. All the beams are created by draw line in between the nodes
using Beam courser and created 132 beams are generating the model. Among these beams 48 are
cables and remaining beams are Girder, tower and Pier. After that sectional properties for
different parts are defined. Rectangular and circular section used here. Whole structure can
divided in four main parts i.e. Girder, Cables, Pier and Tower. Pier and Cable section are circular
section whereas Girder and tower are rectangular [1]. For modeling roller supports are used at
two ends of Bridge. Because only gravitational loads are considered and lateral loads are ignored
for the analysis. Again the Third Karnaphuli Bridge is designed as continuous Bridge [3]. For
follow this condition roller supports are used at the ends. Fixed support is used below the pier.

IICSD-2015 Page 2
The rest portion below the pile cap is ignored. Loads and cables are also defined in next step.
Self-weight is considered as main load for modeling. Lane load is considered as uniformly
distributed load. For defining the load two load cases is formed.

Fig. 1 Cross Section of Third Karnaphuli Bridge Girder

Then Self weight is assign by selecting whole section and UDL is assign only on girder.
External cables take the 20-50% loads of total load [4]. In the Actual third Karnaphuli Bridge 7Φ
36 cables are used [3]. In this modeling equivalent cable diameter is used. The cables are defined
as Member tension only considered that cables will take tensile force only. After defining it will
assign in selected beam. Simple models are also created by following these steps.

2.2 Analysis of the Model

The prototype models generated based on actual span and girder section of Third Karnaphuli
Bridge. Ten different prototype models as well as simple models are developed for study on
different parameter like tower height, cable angle, axial force and stress of girder and cable.
Variation of Deflection of Girder and Cable are also observed from these models. In all models
only variable is their tower height. Analysis of model helps to meet the purpose of this research.

3. Result and Discussions

This paper represents the results found from the analysis done by the software. Table 1 and Table
2 summarize the results of prototype and simple models.

Table-1. Summary of the results of prototype models

Model Tower Angle of Max Max Defle- Deflect- Stress of Stress of

Height Cable Compressive Tensile ction ion on Girder Cable
(m) (Degree) force of force of of Cable (KN/m²) (KN/m²)
Girder Cable Girder (mm)
(KN) (KN) (mm)
P1 20 21.03 65128.90 16528.36 431.53 2577.25 3339.94 330567.20
P2 23 23.86 62530.97 15120.19 427.29 2735.33 3206.72 302403.80
P3 25 25.68 60342.90 14186.20 386.80 2828.90 3094.51 283724.00
P4 27 27.44 58014.19 13296.61 353.57 2996.77 2975.09 265932.20
P5 30 29.98 54496.13 12076.77 313.92 3229.30 2794.67 241535.40
P6 33 32.40 51117.41 11006.00 283.50 3492.32 2621.10 220120.00
P7 35 33.94 48988.46 10372.36 267.08 3684.50 2512.23 207447.40
P8 37 35.43 46971.07 9998.12 253.09 3889.68 2408.78 199962.40
P9 38 36.16 46005.16 9531.72 246.88 3997.23 2359.24 190634.40
P10 40 37.57 44158.30 9037.15 235.78 4222.12 2264.53 180743.00

IICSD-2015 Page 3
The variation of different parameter with respect to change in tower height as well as Angle of
Cable is observed by plotted various curves for prototype models.

The graph (Fig. 2) shown below is Angle of Cable vs. Tower height graph. It demonstrates the
variation of Angle of cable with the variation of Tower height of prototype models. As the tower
height increase the angle of the cable with girder also increases. Maximum Cable angle 37.57
degree found for the maximum tower height 40m. The curve is a linear curve.

Angle of Cable VS Tower Height

40
Angle of Cable (Degree)

35
30
25
Angle of Cable
20 (Degree)
15
10
5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Tower Height (m)

Fig. 2 Variation of Angle of Cable with respect to Tower Height

Change in angle of cable influence the compressive force of girder as well as tensile force of
cable. So the variation of axial force of Girder and Cables with the variation of Angle of Cable is
observed by plotting the following graph (Fig. 3.). Max compressive force curve indicate that, as
the angle of cable increases, compressive force of girder decreases. Maximum compressive force
of girder 65128.90 K takes place for an angle of 21.03 degree (tower height 20m). After this
maximum point with an increase in cable angle, girder axial force is decreases. Maximum
compressive force curve found for different tower height is a linear curve.

Maximum axial Force Vs Angle of Cable

70000
Max Axial Force (KN)

60000
50000 Max Compressive
40000 force (KN)
Max Tensile Force
30000
(KN)
20000
10000
0
0 10 20 30 40
Angle of Cable (degree)

Fig. 3. Variation of Axial forces with the Variation of Angle of Cables

Again, Maximum tensile force curve of cables also indicates same behaviors as Maximum
compressive force curve. As the cable angle increases the cable tensile force decreases. The
maximum tensile force of cable 16528.36 KN also occurs for the same cable angle 21.03 degree.
Stresses of Girder and Cables are also varies as like as Axial force of Girder and Cables.

IICSD-2015 Page 4
The variation of deflection of Girder and Cable with change in tower height for prototype models
are shown is following graph (Fig. 4). It represents that Deflection of Girder decreases with the
increase of tower height, whereas deflection of cables increases gradually with the increase of
tower height.

Deflection of Girder and Cable VS Tower Height

4500
4000
3500
Deflection (mm)

Deflection of
3000 Girder (mm)
2500 Deflection of
2000 Cable (mm)
1500
1000
500
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Tower Height (m)
Fig. 4. Relation between Deflection of Girder and Cables and Tower Height of Prototype models

Maximum deflection of girder 431.53 mm takes place at 20m tower height and minimum
deflection of girder 235.78 mm occurred for 40 m. Conversely maximum deflection of cable
4222.12 mm observed for 40 m Tower Height and minimum deflection of cable take place at 20
m tower height.

Results of different simple models are summarizing by the table below. From this table it can be
seen that, the variation of different parameter with respect to tower height of simple models have
a great similarity with the variation of results of prototype models results.

Table-2. Summary of the results of Simple models

Model Tower Angle of Max Max Defle- Deflect- Stress of Stress of

Height Cable Compressive Tensile ction ion on Girder Cable
(m) (Degree) force of force of of Cable (KN/m²) (KN/m²)
Girder Cable Girder (mm)
(KN) (KN) (mm)
S1 7 19.30 324.50 345.81 21.35 1409.60 216.33 44029.89
S2 9 24.22 358.15 395.46 20.55 1509.21 238.77 50351.53
S3 10 26.56 366.58 412.87 20.17 1568.40 244.39 52568.24
S4 11 28.81 370.50 426.15 19.84 1633.85 247.00 54259.10
S5 12 30.96 370.67 435.91 19.55 1705.56 247.11 55501.78
S6 13 33.02 367.91 442.72 19.29 1783.53 245.27 56368.86
S7 15 36.90 355.91 449.41 18.86 1958.25 237.27 57220.65
S8 17 40.40 338.55 449.46 18.54 2158.00 225.70 57227.02
S9 18 41.99 328.77 447.75 18.42 2267.27 219.19 57009.30
S10 19 43.53 318.59 445.18 18.31 2382.79 212.39 56582.07

IICSD-2015 Page 5
 4. Conclusion

The structural behavior of Extradosed Bridge is concluding as follows based on the analysis
results. From the study, it is observed that, Cables anchored in box girder are working as an
additional prestressing source for pre-stressed box girder.
 Optimum tower height is an important factor for Extradosed Bridge. From the analysis it
was observed that, when the Tower Height rises from 20 m to 25 m the Compressive
force of girder decreases from 65128.90 KN to 60342.90 KN that indicate that for 25%
increase of tower height leads 7.34% reduction of Compressive force of Girder. Again
tensile force of Cable decreases from 16528.36 KN to 14186.2 KN indicates that for
same amount of increase in tower height reduces 14.17% tensile force of Cable.
 A guide line for getting optimum tower height is proposed for which maximum
compressive force of girder occurs with allowable amount of deflection. Deflection of
girder and cables are important factor for selecting an optimum tower height. So
deflection must be within allowable limit. From Analysis Deflection of girder decreases
with an increase of tower height. Although the deflection of girder decreases with an
increase in tower height but the axial forces at 40 m tower height is much smaller. So an
optimum tower height of 10% to 12.5% of main span (which is 20 m - 25 m in the
present study) may be selected for an Extradosed Bridge. Maximum axial forces are
occurred for the above range with an allowable deflection.
 According to the concept of Extradosed Bridge it is desired that the cables should have
much tensile force which will give a higher compressive force in girder. From analysis
result it is seen that maximum compression of girder occurs when the cables are in a
higher tensile force.

5. Acknowledgement

Cordial Encouragements and help Mr. Md. Munirul Islam Saeed, Lecturer, Department of Civil
Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology during software analysis of
STAAD PRO gratefully acknowledged.

6. References

[1] Abu Saleh Md Nuruzzaman, Lessons learnt from the design and construction of Third
Karnaphuli Bridge: The first Extradosed cable stayed Bridge of Bangladesh, Proc. IABSE-
JSCE Joint Conference on Advances in Bridge Engineering-II, Dhaka, 2010.
[2] Becze, J., Barta, [Link], Pre-stressed Extradosed Bridge, Proc. International Association
for Bridge and Structural Engineering Journal (IABSE), pp. SEI 01, 2006.
[3] D. Astin, Design of the Third Karnaphuli Bridge, Proc. IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on
Advances in Bridge Engineering-II, Dhaka, 2010.
[4] Steven L. Stroh On the Development of the Extradosed Bridge Concept, Phd thesis,
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida , Florida,
2012.

IICSD-2015 Page 6

View publication stats