0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 3K views291 pagesTensors For Circuits
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Tensors for Circuits §DOVER BOOKS ON SCIENCE
The Evolution of Scientific Thought: From Newton to Einstein,
A. d’Abro $2.00
The Rise of the New Physics, A. d’Abro Two volume set, $4.00
The Birth and Development of the Geological Sciences,
F.D. Adams $2.00
The Works of Archimedes, Heath $2.00
Language, Truth, and Logic, A.J. Ayer $1.25
An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine,
Claude Bernard $1.50
Foundations of Nuclear Physics, R. T. Beyer $1.75
Non-Euclidean Geometry, R. Bonola $1.95
Experiment and Theory in Physics, Max Born §.60
The Restless Universe, Max Born $2.00
Concerning the Nature of Things, William Bragg $1.35
The Nature of Physical Theory, P,W. Bridgman $1.25
Matter and Light: The New Physics, Louis de Broglie $1.60
Foundations of Science: Philosophy of Theory and Experiment,
N.R. Campbell $2.95
What Is Science? Norman R, Campbell $1.25
Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications,
Rudolf Carnap $1.85
The Common Sense of the Exact Sciences,
William Kingdon Clifford $1.60
Geographical Essays, William Morris Davis $2.95
The Geometry, René Descartes $1.50
A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler, J. L, E: Dreyer $1.98
Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement,
Albert Einstein $1.25
The Elements, Euclid, Heath Three volume set, $6.00
Thermodynamics, Enrico Fermi $1.75
The Analytical Theory of Heat, Joseph Fourier $2.00
Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, Martin Gardner $1.50
The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field,
J. Hadamard $1.25
The Sensations of Tone, Hermann Helmholtz Clothbound $4.95
A Treatise on Plane Trigonometry, E. W. Hobson $1.95
The Realm of the Nebulae, Edwin Hubble $1.50
The Principles of Science, Stanley Jevons $2.98
Calculus Refresher for Technical Men, A. A. Klaf $2.00
(continued on inside back cover)TENSORS for CIRCUITSTENSORS for CIRCUITS
(Formerly entitled 4 Short Course in Tensor Analysis
for Electrical Engineers)
By
GABRIEL KRON
Consulting Engineer, General Electric Co.
Schenectady, New York
With an Introduction by
BANESH HOFFMANN
Department of Mathematics,
Queens College, New York
Second Edition
Dover Publications, Inc.
New York, New York,
CONSTABLE & CO LTD
10-12 ORANGE STREET, LONDON, w.C2Copyright © 1942 by General Electric Company
Copyright © 1959 by Dover Publications, Inc,
All rights reserved under Pan American and
International Copyright Conventions.
Published simultaneously in Canada by
McClelland and Stewart Limited.
This new Dover edition, first published in 1959,
is a corrected and unabridged republication
of the work first published under the title
A Short Course in Tensor Analysis for Electri-
cal Engineers. The new Introduction by Banesh
Hoffmann and the Bibliography of the author’s
writings were especially prepared for this
edition.
Manufactured in the United States of America
Dover Publications, Inc.
180 Varick Street
New York 14, New YorkTo
PHILIP L. ALGERINTRODUCTION TO DOVER EDITION
Some people seem destined to be centers of controversy. I can
think of no one who would dispute Gabriel Kron’s eminent right to
be numbered among them.
Kron’s early work opened new domains in the applications of
tensor analysis, yet when it first appeared it received scant atten-
tion, and later, when it began to be recognized as possibly signifi-
cant, it was much vilified. Various complaints were made; that it
was completely wrong; that it might perhaps at bottom be correct
but used tensors improperly ; that it used tensors not at all but was
old stuff decked out in matrix clothing; and that even this deck-
ing out was not new. One observed a curious conflict of trends
in the complaints: the work was wrong — the work was right
but not new. Either way, Kron could hardly gain the impression
that he was being flattered, except perhaps by attention.
J. Slepian once likened Kron’s work to fruit salad; and A.
Duschek and A. Hochrainer, in the introduction to their book
Grundziige der Tensorrechnung in Analytischer Darstellung,
dismissed an American author — evidently Kron —with the fol-
lowing words:
Ein besonderes krasser Fall ist aber der eines amerikanischen
Autors, der die Tensorrechnung geradezu mit Gewalt auf die
Theorie der elektrischen Maschinen und Netze anwenden will,
sich bis zu den Begriffen , absolutes Differential" und ,Kriim-
mungstensor” versteigt und dariiber dicke Biicher and lange
Serien von Abhandlungen veréffentlicht.’’*
Why should the work of Kron have excited such general ani-
mosity? One reason is, doubtless, its bold originality, for the lot
* The precise flavor of the invective is hard to render into English. The
following is an approximate translation: A particularly crass instance,
however, is that of an American author, who wants to apply the tensor
calculus with downright violence to the theory of electric machines and
networks, even goes so far as to use the concepts “absolute differential”
and “curvature tensor,” and publishes thick books and long series of
papers on it all.viii B. HOFFMANN
of the innovator is rarely smooth. Another may lie in the very
nature of Kron’s synthesis, bringing together, as it does, the
previously disparate fields of electrical engineering and tensor
analysis. In the early days few people were equipped to assay
the work of Kron since, for the most part, those who knew elec-
trical engineering did not know tensor analysis and those who
knew tensor analysis did not know electrical engineering. The
impression thus arose that the work was formidably difficult,
and this may well have prejudiced people against it. Actually it
is no more difficult than many things that electrical engineers
have learned to take in their stride; and such difficulty as there
may be is more than compensated by a superb unification.
Originality and apparent difficulty may partly explain the re-
sistance Kron’s work has encountered. But Kron himself is also
to blame, for he is far from being a convincing expositor. His
primitive concept of rigor, his appeal to “generalization postu-
lates” in lieu of proofs, his attempts, fortunately absent from the
present book, to impress by a sort of name dropping of impres-
sive-sounding terms like Riemann-Christoffel Curvature Tensor
and Unified Field Theory — these and other faults have alienated
many people.
Kron would be the first to concede his lack of rigor. He does
not claim to be a pure mathematician. But we have no right to
insist that an innovator present his ideas in impeccable form.
We must take our innovators as they come, and we should be
grateful to get their ideas in any intelligible form at all. Newton
himself, by modern standards, was shockingly unrigorous in his
presentation of the calculus; and unrigorous too by standards
of his time, for his work was validly criticized by Bishop Berkeley.
Let us concede that Kron writes thick books and long series
of papers, that in some of his papers he is willfully obscure,
that he seems to delight in being irritating, that he lacks all
concept of mathematical rigor, and that he makes errors. Let us
make all other valid complaints against him. There remains
nevertheless an impressive corpus of work that stamps him as
an innovator of major importance.
P. Le Corbeiller wrote in the preface of his book Matrix Analy-
sis of Electric Networks:
“Kron is the author of a method of analysis of rotating elec-
trical machinery, in which one and the same tensor equationINTRODUCTION TO DOVER EDITION ix
applies to every conceivable type of machine. This, in my opinion,
is the most significant advance in electrical engineering analysis
since the introduction of impedances by Kennelly and Steinmetz
and of the two-reaction method by A. Blondel.”
‘And P. Langevin, who was the first to champion the seemingly
grotesque ideas of de Broglie on the wave nature of matter,
quickly recognized the importance of Kron’s work and saw to it
that Kron was awarded the Montefiore prize. Indeed, Kron now
has a signifivant international following, particularly in England,
France, and Japan.
Outside of geometry and the theory of relativity, the applica-
tions of tensor analysis have often been, from the tensorial point
of view, rather trifling. To write basic equations in tensorial
form by means of covariant derivatives is hardly to exhaust the
resources of the tensor calculus and while the use of the tensor
law of transformation to express these equations in terms of
spherical and cylindrical coordinates may at one time have
seemed remarkable, it is a small matter compared with the uses
to which Kron puts the tensor transformation law.
For Kron uses tensors to unify great classes of physical sys-
tems. With him a tensor transformation changes, for example,
the equations of one electrical machine to those of another elec-
trical machine of different type. He constructs prototype ma-
chines — the primitive machines — from whose equations he
obtains those of all other electrical machines by applying ap-
propriate tensor transformations. This in itself is a masterly
unification. But in addition Kron shows how different established
theories of a given machine are convertible into one another by
tensor transformation.
To accomplish these things Kron goes beyond the types of
transformations usually employed in technological applications
of tensor analysis. His transformations are often singular, and
in certain important cases non-holonomic. That such transforma-
tions are essential ingredients of the unification is an indication
of the non-trivial nature of Kron’s achievement. But for some
reason their presence has called forth strong criticism. True, they
are unexpected; that may make them suspect, but it does not
make them wrong.
Do we wish to criticize Kron’s use of singular transforma-
tions? Then, to be consistent, we should criticize also the use ofx B. HOFFMANN
such tensor transformations in the theory of Lagrangian dy-
namics. Do we complain that Kron uses non-holonomic reference
frames? Then, to be consistent, we should complain too about
the Maxwell-Lorentz electrodynamics, for Lorentz was the man
who first realized the non-holonomic character of the currents
used therein as electrodynamical coordinates.
There is irony in the fact that Lagrangian dynamics and Max-
well-Lorentz electrodynamics had been accepted without demur
by the very critics who objected to Kron’s using singular and
non-holonomic transformations, for while Kron went well be-
yond what had been done before with these transformations he
did no violence to the ideas already present in embryonic form
in dynamics and electrodynamics.
In more advanced work growing out of that presented in this
book, Kron uses the curvature tensor, a fact noted with appar-
ent distaste by Duschek and Hochrainer. Kron uses the curva-
ture tensor in both holonomic and non-holonomic reference
frames, something probably without precedent in the techno-
logical applications of tensors. But he uses it because it comes
in naturally. He does not drag it in arbitrarily merely to impress
or annoy —though once it is in he is not above using it for
those purposes.
When first I encountered Kron’s work, nearly a quarter of a
century ago, I was extremely dubious of its validity, and even
of its plausibility. Trained, as I was, in the tensorial tradition
of geometry and relativity, I balked at the use of singular trans-
formations the elements of whose matrices were mainly ones,
minus ones, and zeros; the tensor nature of such work seemed
highly suspect. I can sympathize with Duschek and Hochrainer
in the attitude they expressed many years ago towards Kron’s
work, for, because of the extraordinary originality of that work,
its initial effect on those who knew tensors was indeed shocking.
But I have long been convinced that the work that forms the
topic of this book is both valid and important, that it makes
proper, if novel, use of tensor concepts, that tensors are an in-
tegral and essential part of it, and that it constitutes an epoch
making extension of the realm of application of tensor analysis.
In recent years Kron has considerably extended his method and
advanced into new territories of application, Each advance has
excited new controversy reminiscent of the old, but I am lessINTRODUCTION TO DOVER EDITION xi
competent to discuss these matters, lacking sufficient expertness
in the fields involved.
The present book, ostensibly an introduction to tensor analysis,
is really an introduction to Kron’s tensor theory of stationary
electrical networks and rotating electrical machines. If you seek
in it a rigorous presentation of the subject you will be disap-
pointed. Approach it with a different attitude. Seek in it a
working introduction to the remarkable methods that Kron
discovered. Accept the assurances of myself and increasingly
many others that the work can be demonstrated to be funda-
mentally valid. Read the book, in fact, as you would read a work
by Heaviside now that it is no longer fashionable to deride him—
for Heaviside and Kron have much in common. Do this and you
will find to your delight that the basic procedures are clearly
set forth, the various aspects of the generalized machine are
patiently portrayed, the illustrative examples are nicely worked
out, the steps to be taken are carefully codified—in short, that,
within its limitations, this book is almost a model of exposition.
For no one presents the ideas of Kron more vividly than Kron
himself.
June, 1958 BANESH HOFFMANN
Queens College
Flushing, N. Y.PUBLICATIONS OF GABRIEL KRON
IL. Books
The Application of Tensors to the
Analysis of Rotating Electrical
Machinery. Schenectady: General
Electric Review, 1938. Pp. xii +
187.
Tensor Analysis of Networks. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, 1939.
Pp. xxiv + 635,
A Short Course in Tensor Analysis
for Electrical Engineers. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, 1942.
Pp. xv + 250.
Equivalent Circuits of Electrical
Machinery. New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 1951. Pp. xviii +
278.
Il. Monographs published in serial form
“The Application of Tensors to the
Analysis of Rotating Electrical
Machinery, Part I, The Algebra
of Hypercomplex Numbers,” Gen-
eral Electric Review, XXXVIII
(April, 1935), 181-91.
“Part II, Transformation The-
ory,” Ibid. (May, 1935), 230-43.
“Part III, The Generalized Ro-
tating Machine,” Ibid. (June,
1935), 282-92.
“Part IV, Machines with Sta-
tionary “Axes,” Ibid., (July,
1935), 339-44; (August, 1935),
386-91.
“Part V, Labor-Saving Devices,”
Ibid., (September, 1935), 434-
40; (October, 1935), 473-79.
“Part VI, Moving Reference
Axes,” Ibid., (November, 1935),
527-36.
“Part VII, Machines with Mov-
ing Axes,” Ibid., (December,
1935), 582-91,
“Part VIII, Interconnected Ma-
chines,” Ibid., XXXIX (Febru-
ary, 1936), 108-16.
“Part IX, The Building Up of
New Geometrie Objects,” Ibid.,
(March, 1936), 155-59.
“Part X, The Various Forms of
the Equation of Motion,” Ibid.,
(April, 1936), 201-10.
“Part XI, Machines under Accel-
eration,” Ibid., (May, 1936),
249-57.
“Part XII, Small Oscillations,”
Ibid., (June, 1936), 297-306.
“Part XII, Oscillating Refer-
ence Axes,” Ibid., (August, 1936),
397-402; (October, 1936), 504-9.
“Part XIV, Oscillations in Slip-
Ring Machines,” Ibid., XL (Feb-
rvary, 1937), 101-7; (April,
1937), 197-202,
“Part XV, The Raising and Low-
ering of Indices,” Ibid., (June,
1937), 296-202; (August, 1937),
389-96,
“Part XVI, The Basic Theory
of Networks,” Ibid., (October,
1937), 490-6; (December, 1937),
594-601; XLI (March,’ 1938),
153-59.
“Part XVII, Nonholonomic Ref-
erence Frames,” Ibid., (May,
1938), 244-50.
“Part XVIII, The Dynamical
Equations of Lagrange,” Ibid.,
(October, 1938), 448-54,
“Tensorial Analysis of Integrated
Transmission Systems, Part I,
The Six Basic Reference
Frames,” Transactions AIEE,
xiiixiv
PUBLICATIONS OF GABRIEL KRON
Il. Monographs in serial form—Continued
“Tensorial Analysis”—Cont
XX (1951), 1239-46,
art II, Off-Nominal Turn Ra-
tios,” I[bid., LXXI (1952), 505-12.
“Part III, The ‘Primitive’ Divi-
sion,” Ibid., (1952), 814-21.
“Part IV, The Interconnection of
Transmission Systems,” Ibid.,
LXXII (1953), 827-38.
“Diakopties,—The Piecewise Solu-
tion of Large-Scale Systems,”
The Electrical Journal (London),
formerly The Electrician, “An
Introduction to Universal’ Engi-
neering” (June 7, 1957), 1673-77.
“Chapter I, Topology of Piece-
wise Analysis,” Ibid., (July 5,
1957), 27-34; (July 12, 1957),
101-5.
“Chapter II, Orthogonal Net-
works.” Ibid., (August 9, 1957),
385-94.
“Chapter III, Piecewise Solution
of Diffusion-Type Networks,"
Thid, (September 18, 1957), 745-
Shapter IV, Topology of Piece-
wise Solution,” Ibid., (October
11, 1957), 1041-49,
“Chapter V, Topological Model
of a Transportation Problem,”
Ibid., (November 15, 1957), 1409-
u
“Chapter VI, Piecewise Optimi-
zation of Linear Programming,”
., (December 13, 1957), 1713-
“Chapter VII, Generalization of
Topology to Mechanical Struc-
tures,” Ibid., (January 10, 1958),
93-98.
“Chapter VIII, Building-Blocks
of Elastic Structures,” Ibid.,
(February 7, 1958), 399-407.
“Chapter IX, Turbine Split-Dia-
phragms,” Tbid., (March 7,
1958), 705-11,
“Chapter X, Piecewise Solution
of Non-Linear Plastic Strue-
tures,” Ibid., (April, 1958), 1141-
41.
“Chapter XI, Topological Models
of the Elastic Field,” Ibid., (May,
1958), 1435-44.
“Chapter XII, Piecewise Solution
of Mesh Networks,” Ibid., (June,
1958), 1711-18,
“Chapter XIII, Piecewise Solu-
tion of Poisson-Type Networks,”
Ibid., (July, 1958), 25.
“Chapter XIV, Pyramiding Su-
persystem Solutions,” Ibid., (Au-
gust, 1958), 289-94,
“Chapter XV, Piecewise Analyt-
ical Solutions (One Parameter
per Subdivision),” Ibid. (Sep-
tember, 1958), 701-05.
“Chapter XVI, Singular Subdivi-
sions,” Ibid.,’ (October, 1958),
1071-77.
“Chapter XVII, Piecewise Solu-
tion of Eigenvalue Problems,”
Ibid., (November, 1958), 1371-77.
“Chapter XVIII, Piecewise Solu-
tion of Time-Varying Problems,”
Ibid., (December, 1958), 1727-
32.
“Chapter XIX, Elastic Building.
Blocks of Polyatomie Molecules,”
Ibid., (January, 1959), 149-55.
“Chapter XIX, Epilogue—and
Prologue to Multidimensional
Wave Models,” Ibid., (February,
1959).
III. Articles about Tensor Analysis “In The Large” (Topology)
“Tensor Analysis of Rotating Ma-
chinery,” Baia-Mare, Rumania:
Privately printed, (May, 1932).
Presented at the January 1933
Winter Convention of AIEE.
“Discussion of Summer's Paper:
‘Vector Theory of Circuits In-
volving Synchronous Machines,’ ”
Trans. AIRE, LI (Sune, 1932),
325.
“Non-Riemannian Dynamics of Ro-
tating Electrical Machinery,”
Jour. of Math, and Physics, XIII-
2 (May, 1934), 103-94,PUBLICATIONS OF GABRIEL KRON xv
III. Tensor Analysis “In The Large”—Continued
“Quasi-Holonomic Dynamical Sys-
tems,” Physics, VII-4 (April,
1936), 143-52.
“Analyse Tensorielle appliquée a
PArt de VIngénieur,” Bull. de
P Association des Ingénieurs Elec-
triciens sortis de l'Institut Elec-
trotechnique Montefiore, No. 9
(September, 1936) ; No. 10 (Octo-
ber, 1936); No. 1 (January,
1937), No. 2 (February, 1937).
“Tensor Analysis of Multielectrode-
Tube Circuits,” Electrical Engr.,
LV (November, 1936), 1220-42.
“Invariant Forms of the Maxwell-
Lorentz Field Equations for Ac-
celerated Systems,” Jour. of Ap-
plied Physics, IX-3
1938), 196-208.
“Classification of the Reference
‘Frames of a Synchronous Ma-
chine,” Trans. AIEE, LXIX
(1950), 720-27.
“Stationary Networks and Trans-
mission Lines Along Uniformly
Rotating Reference Frames,”
Trans. AIEE, LXVUI—Part 1
(1949), 690-96.
“So You Are Going To Study Ten-
sors?” The Matriz & Tensor
Quarterly, 1-4 (June, 1952),
3-6; BEAMA Journal, (October,
1952), 306-9.
(March,
IV. Articles about Equivalent Circuits of Electrical Machinery
“Equivalent Circuit of the Capaci-
tor Motor,” G.E. Review, XLIV-9
(September, 1941), 511-13.
“Equivalent Circuit of the Salient-
Pole Synchronous Machine,” G.E.
Review, XLIV-12 (December,
1941), 679-83.
“The Double-Fed Machine,” Trans.
AIEE, LXI (May, 1942), 286-89.
“Equivalent Circuit of the Primi-
tive Rotating Machine,” G.E. Re-
view, XLIX (March, 1946), 43-9.
“Equivalent Circuits of the Primi-
tive Rotating Machine with
Asymmetrical Stator and Rotor,”
Trans. AIEE, UXVI (1947) 17-
3,
“Tensorial Analysis and Equivalent
Circuit of a Variable-Ratio Fre-
quency Changer,” Trans. AIEE,
LXVI (1947), 1503-6.
“Steady-State Equivalent Circuits
of Synchronous and Induction
Machines,” Trans. AIEE, LXVII
(1948), 175-81.
“Equivalent Circuits of the Shaded-
Pole Motor with Space Har-
monies,” Trans. AIEE, LXIX
(1950), 735-41.
V. Articles about Theory of Electrical Devices
“Generalized Theory of Electrical
Machinery,” Trans. AIEE, XLIX
(April, 1930), 666-85.
“Induction Motor Slot Combina-
tions,” Trans. AIEE, L (June,
1931), 757-68.
“Tracing of Electron Trajectories
Using the Differential Analyzer,
Part I,” Proc. LR.E., XXXVI-
1:Pt.1 (January, 1948), 70-73.
VI. Articles about Stability of Multi-Energy Systems
“Equivalent Circuits for the Hunt-
ing of Electrical Machinery,”
Trans. AIEE, LXI (May, 1942),
290-96.
“Equivalent Circuits for Oscillat-
ing Systems and the Riemann-
Christoffel Curvature Tensor,”
Trans. AIEE, LX (January,
1943), 25-31.
“Self-Excited Oscillation of Capaci-
tor-Compensated Long-Distance
Transmission Systems,” (withPUBLICATIONS OF GABRIEL KRON
VI. Stability of Multi-Energy Systems—Continued
“Self-Excited Oscillation” —Cont
R.B. Bodine and C. Concordia),
Trane. AIBE, LXII (January,
1943), 41-44.
“Steady-State and Hunting Equiva-
lent Circuits of Long-Distance
Transmission Systems,” G.E. Re-
view, XLVI (June, 1943), 337-42.
“Damping and Synchronizing
Torques of Power Selsyns,” (with
C. Concordia), Trans. | AIKE,
LXIV (June, 1945), 366-71.
“A New Theory of Hunting,”
Trans. AIEE, LXXI (October,
1952), 859-66.
VII. Articles about Control of Multi-Energy Systems
“The Direct-Acting Generator Volt-
age Regulator,” (with W.K.
Boice, S.B. Crary, and L.W.
Thompson), Trans. AIEE, LIX
(March, 1940), 149-157.
“Tensorial Analysis of Control Sys-
tems,” Jour. of Applied Mechan-
ics, XV (June, 1948), A107-124.
“Regulating System for Dynamo-
Electric Machine,” U.S. Patent
No. 2, 692, 967 (October 26,
1954).
“A. ‘Super-Regulator’- Cancelling
the Transient Reactance of Syn-
chronous Machines,” Matrix &
Tensor Quarterly, V-3_ (March,
1955), 71-75; The Electrical
Journal, CLIV-14 (April, 1955).
“A Physical Interpretation of the
Riemann-Christoffel Curvature
Tensor,’ The Tensor (Japan),
IV-3 (March, 1955), 150-72.
VIII. Articles about Electric-Circuit Models of
Non-Electrical Systems
“Equivalent Circuits of the Elastic
Field;” Jour. of Applied Mechan-
ics, XI (1944), A-149-A-161.
‘Network Analyzer Solution of the
Equivalent Circuits of Elastic
Structures,” (with G.K. Carter),
Jour. of the Franklin Institute,
CCXXXVIII (December, 1944),
443-52.
“Tensorial Analysis and Equiva-
lent Circuits of Elastic Struc-
tures,” Jour. of the Franklin In-
stitute, CCXXXVIII (December,
1944), 400-42.
“Blectric Circuit Models of the
Schrédinger Equation,” The
Physical Review, LXVII-12
(January 1, 15, 1945), 39-43.
“A.C. Network Analyzer Study of
the Schrédinger Equation,” (with
GK. Carter), The Physical Re-
view, LXVII-12 (January 1, 15,
1945), 44-49.
“Numerical Solution of Ordinary
and Partial Differential Equa-
tions by Means of Equivalent
Circuits,” Jour. of Applied Phy-
sics, XVI-3 (March, 1945), 172-
86.
“Equivalent Circuits of Compres-
sible and Incompressible Fluid
Flow Fields,” Jour. Aeronautical
Sciences, XII-2 (April, 1945),
221-31.
“Numerical and Network Analyzer
Tests of an Equivalent Circuit
for Compressible Fluid Flow,”
(with G.K. Carter), Jour. of
Aeronautical Sciences, XII-2
(April, 1945) 232-34,
“Blectric Circuit Models for the
Vibration Spectrum of Poly-
atomic Molecules,” Jour. Chem-
ical Physics, XIV-1 (January,
1946), 19-31,
“Network Analyzer Tests of Equiv-
alent Circuits of Vibration Poly-
atomic Molecules,” (with G. K.
Carter), Jour. Chemical Physics,
XIV-1 (January, 1946), 32-34.PUBLICATIONS OF GABRIEL KRON
VIII. Electric-Circuit Models—Continued
“Equivalent Circuits for the Nu-
merical Solution of the Critical
Speeds of Flexible Shafts,” Jour.
of Applied Mechanics, XIII-2
(June, 1946) A 109-A 117.
“Electric Circuit Models of Partial
Differential Equations,” Electri-
cal Engr., (July, 1948), 672-84.
“Electric Circuit Models of the
Nuclear Reactor,” Trans. AIEE,
LXXIII (1954), 259-65,
IX. Articles about Tearing of Topological Models
“A Set of Principles to Interconnect
the Solutions of Physical Sys-
tems,” Jour. of Applied Physics,
XXIV (August, 1953), 965-80.
“A Method for Solving Very Large
Physical Systems in Easy
Stages,” Proc. R.E., XLII-4
(April, 1954), 680-86,
“Solving Highly Complex Elastic
Structures in Easy Stages,” Jour.
of Applied Mechanics, XXII-2
(June, 1955), 235-44.
“Detailed Example of Interconnect-
ing Piecewise Solutions,” Jour.
of Franklin Institute, XXV-5
(April, 1955), 307-83.
“Inverting a 256x256 Matrix,” En-
gineering (London), CLXXVIII
(March 11, 1955).
“Tearing and Interconnecting as a
Form of Transformation,” Quar-
terly of Applied Math., XIII-2
(July, 1955), 147-59.
“Solution of Complex Nonlinear
Plastic Structures by the Method
of Tearing,” Jour. of Aeronauti-
eal Sciences, XXII-6 (June,
1956), 557-62.
“Multiple Substitution of Basic
Vectors in Linear Program-
ming,” Matrix & Tensor Quar-
terly, VII-1 (September, 1956),
B11.
“Improved Procedures for Inter-
connecting Piecewise Solutions,”
Jour. of Franklin Institute,
CCLXII-6 (November, 1956),
385-92,
“Blectrical Power Engineering as
a Spearhead of ‘Universal’ En-
gineering,” Bull. of, Electrical
Engr. Education (Univ. of Man-
chester), (December, 1956), 1-20.
“Diakoptics—A Gateway into Uni-
versal Engineering,” The Elec-
trical Journal (London), (De-
cember, 1956).
“A Very Simple Example of Piece-
wise Solution,” Matrix & Tensor
Quarterly, VIII-1 (September,
1957), 13-15.
“Tearing, Tensors and Topological
Models,” American Scientist,
XLV-5, (December, 1957), 401-
13.
“Numerical Example for Intercon-
necting Piecewise Solutions of
Elastic Structures,” Memoirs of
the Unifying Study of the Basic
Problems in Engineering Sci-
ences by Means of Geometry,
Vol. I1, (Association for Science
Documents Information, Tokyo,
Japan).
“Diakoptics—The Science of Tear-
ing, Tensors and Topological
Models,” Memoirs of the Unify-
ing Study of the Basic Problems
in Engineering Sciences by
Means of Geometry, Vol. II, (As-
sociation for Science Documents
Information, Tokyo, Japan).
“Factorized Inverse of Partitioned
Matrices, Matrix and Tensor
Quarterly, VIII, No. 2, Dee.
1957, 89-41.
You might also like
Robert S. Elliot, Antenna Theory and Design, Revised Edition, JohnWiley & Sons, New York, 2003., The Free Encyclopedia PDF
Robert S. Elliot, Antenna Theory and Design, Revised Edition, JohnWiley & Sons, New York, 2003., The Free Encyclopedia PDF
4 pages