100% found this document useful (1 vote)
251 views2 pages

HCPR - IWDGF Foot Risk Classification

This document presents an international risk classification system for diabetic foot ulcers and amputations. It outlines 6 risk categories based on factors like sensation, deformity, history of ulcers or amputation, and arterial disease. Each category lists associated interventions like education, footwear recommendations, and follow up schedules with generalist or specialist physicians. Higher risk categories involve more intensive interventions and have higher predicted risks of ulceration or amputation within 3 years.

Uploaded by

Eva Arna Abrar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
251 views2 pages

HCPR - IWDGF Foot Risk Classification

This document presents an international risk classification system for diabetic foot ulcers and amputations. It outlines 6 risk categories based on factors like sensation, deformity, history of ulcers or amputation, and arterial disease. Each category lists associated interventions like education, footwear recommendations, and follow up schedules with generalist or specialist physicians. Higher risk categories involve more intensive interventions and have higher predicted risks of ulceration or amputation within 3 years.

Uploaded by

Eva Arna Abrar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot Risk Classification System1 with Associated Interventions

Risk for
Ulceration or
Risk Category Criteria Interventions Amputation in
the Next 3
Years2
 Diagnosis of diabetes  Education including advise on appropriate footwear
 Intact sensation  Possible shoe accommodations
0
 ABI >0.8mmHg or toe pressure  Annual assessment by a generalist physician:
5.1% risk of
>45mmHg o Neurovascular status, i.e. palpation of pedal pulses, 10g
Normal, no ulceration
neuropathy  No hx of ulceration monofilament testing
 +/- Foot deformity o Dermal thermometry
o Inspection of feet and footwear
 Diagnosis of diabetes Same interventions as category 0 PLUS:
 Sensation absent  Consider prescriptive/accommodative footwear (this will require a pedorthic
1
 ABI >0.8mmHg or toe pressure or orthotist consult)
>45mmHg  Assessment of the person by a generalist physician every three to six months:
Loss of 14.3% risk of
protective  No hx of ulceration or Charcot o Neurovascular status, i.e. palpation of pedal pulses, 10g
ulceration
deformity monofilament testing
sensation
(LOPS)  No foot deformity o Dermal thermometry
o Inspection of feet and footwear
o Yearly dynamic plantar pressure updates
 Diagnosis of diabetes Same interventions as category 1 PLUS:
 Sensation absent  Consider pedorthic/orthotic consultation for possible custom-molded/extra-
 ABI >0.8mmHg or toe pressure depth shoes
>45mmHg  Consider need for prophylactic surgery if footwear is not able to 18.8% risk of
2a
 No hx of ulceration or Charcot accommodate foot deformity or relieve the focus of stress ulceration
deformity  Assessment of the person by a generalist physician every two-three months:
LOPS and
deformity  Foot deformity (focus of stress) o Neurovascular status, i.e. palpation of pedal pulses, 10g 3.1% risk of
monofilament testing amputation
o Dermal thermometry
o Inspection of feet and footwear
o Yearly dynamic plantar pressure updates
2b  Diagnosis of diabetes Same interventions as category 2a PLUS: 18.8% risk of
 Sensation present/absent  Consider vascular consultation, possible revascularization ulceration
Peripheral  ABI <0.8mmHg or toe pressure  Assessment of the person by a specialist physician every two-three months
arterial <45mmHg 3.1% risk of
disease  May have an ulcer amputation
 Diagnosis of diabetes Same interventions as category 2a PLUS:
3a  Sensation absent  Assessment of the person by a specialist physician every one-two months 55.8% risk of
 ABI >0.8mmHg or toe pressure ulceration
Pervious >45mmHg
history of  Hx of ulceration and/or Charcot 20.9% risk of
ulceration deformity amputation
 Foot deformity (focus of stress)
 Diagnosis of diabetes Same interventions as category 3a PLUS:
 Sensation absent  Assessment of the person by a specialist physician every one-two months
3b 55.8% risk of
 ABI >0.8mmHg or toe pressure
ulceration
>45mmHg or ABI <0.8mmHg or NOTE: If there is a below knee amputation on one leg, there is a 50% likelihood of
Previous
toe pressure <45mmHg a similar amputation on the opposite extremity within five years3
history of 20.9% risk of
 Hx of ulceration and/or Charcot
amputation amputation
deformity
 Foot deformity (focus of stress)

References
1. Lavery L, Peters E, Williams J, et al. Reevaluating the way we classify the diabetic foot: Restructuring the diabetic foot risk classification
system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(1):154–156.
2. Peters EJ, Lavery LA. Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot.
Diabetes Care. 2001:24(8):1442.
3. Izumi Y, Satterfield K, Kee S, et al. Risk of amputation in diabetic patients stratified by limb and level of amputation: A 10 year observation.
Diabetes Care. 2006:29(3):566-570.

You might also like