A Manual For The Application of The Critical Path Method To Highway Projects in India
A Manual For The Application of The Critical Path Method To Highway Projects in India
Special Publication 14
A MANUAL
FOR THE
APPLICATION OF
THE CRITICAL
PATH METHOD
TO HIGHWAY
PROJECTS IN
INDIA
A MANUAL
FOR THE
APPLICATION OF
THE CRITICAL
PATH METHOD
TO HIGHWAY
PROJECTS IN
INDIA
Published by
The Indian Roads Congress
1 are reserved)
(lire .Ri:~Jrtso/Pzdthnitmn and y~p
Page
(‘El P’I’ER I i nitrod ti ct tOri
(‘HAPTER 2 Delhi iiioi ns 5
CHAPTER —••— 3 Network Construction 11
CHAPTF:iR’ 4 Assignment of Duration for Activities 17
CHAPTER- 5 Determination of Proiect Schedule
and (‘nt ical Path 21
CHAPTER 6 Ccst4’inne Balancing 27
(‘RAPiER ........... 7 Resources ( Manpower, Equiprnen I)
Scheduling 33
CHAPTER 8 Budgeting and Actual Cost 39
CHAPTER—- 9 Application of (‘PM to ether related
Highway Matters 43
(:HAP’FER ‘ lO Advantage:s i:’if the Applicatior of C’
to H ighis ay Projects 49
CHAPTER ...“. ii Limitations of’ (‘PM 53
C H A PTE: P. I2 Example ofa Bridge Project 57
CHAPTER —13 E%am pIe of .a Road Project 61
APPENDICES
Page
I. CPM Network for a Bridge Project ... 81
II. Bar Graph of a Bridge Project •.. 83
IlL Modified CPM Network fora Bridge Project ... 85
IV. CPM Network for a Road Project ... 87
V. Bar Graph for a Road Project ... 89
<< VI
Introduction
~ntroduction
<<
CHAPTER 1
1. INTRODUCTION
<<
Def~nitionS
Definitions
<<
CHAPTER 2
2, DEFINITIONS
Fig, 1
(ii) Activity
An activity is a part of the project denoted by an arrow on the
network, the tail representing the start of the activity and the head
the end of the activity. One and only one arrow can he used to
represent one activity or operation. Each activity has to have a given
time. ‘However, length and direction of the arrow have no significance.
For example in Fig. 1, an activity can be represented as l~2 or
by ‘A’.
<<
S Definitions
(Iii) Event
An eve.nt is a stage or a point where all previous jobs are
complete and the succeeding ones are to start. The event is represen-
ted on the network by a circle (node) at the junction of arrows, An
event cannot occur until all the activities leading to it are completed.
Similarly, no activities emanating from an event can start until the
event has occured. These events are numbered in their sequential
order on the network.
(iv) Durations
Duration is the estimated time required to complete an activity
and is denoted on the activity in the network. For example the
duration for activity 1-2 (A) is 9 days in the network shown in Fig. I
The duration can be expressed in any convenient unit such as hours,
days, weeks, months. etc.
(vi) Restraint
It is a restriction very similar to a dummy activity but has a
duration which can be either negative or positive. It is frequently used
to fix intermediate dates within the network and thereby fix the
relative start or finish of the parallel activities, when these activities
are not coincident.
<<
10 Definitions
will not delay the overall project time, Interfering float i~denoted
by IF.
1FTF—FF
<<
Network Construction 11
Network
Construction
<<
CHAPTER 3
3. NETWORK CONSTRUCTION
A ô C ~® ~tc”tiSh~i~’err ~
Logic behind the diagram
FiG -5
<<
Network Construction 15
p C 0 ~
dummy activity to main-
ta~lgka1quene
inter-retattonships.
Fig, 6
<<
Assignment of Durations for 17
Activities
4
Assignment of
Durations for
Activities
<<
CHAPTER 4
<<
DeterminaUon of Project 21
Schedule and Critical Path
5
Determination of
Project Schedule
and Critical Path
<<
CHAPTER 5
<<
24 Determination of Project Schedule and Critical Path
Fig. 7
5.2. The events in whiëh the EFT and LFT are the same or
in other words there is no leeway, fall on the critical path. The
critical path is shown in heavy lines on the network in Fig. 7 and
passes through the events 1, 2, 4~,S and ~. It may be noticed that
for any particular project, there may he more than one critical path.
The critical path will be ~acontinuous line beginning, from the start of
the project and ending at its completion. All activities on the criti-
cal path must be completed on schedule and cannot be prolonged. On
the other hand, the aetivities outs~de the critical path, can he pro-
longed within, the limits indicated by their floats, without prolonging
the total project time.
<<
Determination of Project Schedule and Critical Path 25
TABLE 1
d~cLi’~
LEY L)ura— : I I
ItciT)
~
Auo~
I t~On
da~
r EST 1ST E~T LFT TF }~F IF \rnark~
~ ~ ~ ~
A I 9 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 Criti-
cal
B 1-3 9 0 6 9 15 6 0 6 —
( ‘ 24 9 9 33 33 0 0 0 Criti-
cal
F 2-6 12 9 29 21 4! 20 0 20
1) 3-4 18 9 15 27 33 6 6 0 —
U 3-5 15 9 18 24 33 9 9 0 —
ii 5-7 14 33 39 47 53 6 0 6
M 5-9 30 33 33 63 63 0 0 0 Criti-
cal
1 6-7 12 21 41 33 53 20 14 6
J 6-8 2 21 54 23 56 33 0 33 —
L 7-9 10 47 53 57 63 6 6 0 —
K 8-9 7 23 56 30 63 33 33 0 *
<<
26 Determination of Project Schedule and CrItical Path
voR~cwtc~
D~15~
11~LMMtRO~ RITICJ~ 0 tO 20 ~O 40 SO ~O 70
A1 1-2
e~ H3
C 24 .
F 2-6
D 3-4
G 3-S
E 4-7
~,4 5.7 UZ~
M S-~
1 6-7
51 . ~zZ~7Z~ZZZ!
L a-9 1
L~L
SCHEDULED -ç ~ R
DuRATtOH F- RE E FLOAT
AT
<<
Cost-Time Balancing 27
Cost-Ti me
Ba’ancing
<<
CHAPTER 6
6. COST—TIME BALANCING
Fig. 9
It will be seen that the critical path which was earlier along 1, 2,
4, 5 and 9 has changed to 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 and the project duration
time has shortened to 57 days from the earlier period of 63 days.
<<
30 Cost—Time Balancing
6.3. In order to evaluate the monetary affect of reducing or
increasing the duration of each activity, it is necessary’ to have
activity time/cost relations, Such relations can be established only
on the basis of past records of project cost and time. It would be
necessary [Orthe organisation to develop a bank of such data so that
effective use can be made of them in futpre scheduling of projects
and working out the optimum solution. A typical time/cost curve
for an activity is illustrated in Fig. 10. The lowest cost (least cost)
is also called the normal cost and the time when this is obtained is
called the normal time, From the curve it is seen that as the time is
reduced, the cost tends to go up curvilineary, till a point of least time
reached, Further reduction in time is not possible and the cost
increases with no time reduction, The least time is often called
“crash time” and the operation of speeding up an activity is called
“crashing’’. The minimum cost of the project at the crash time is called
the “crash cost for least time”. For approximation, the curvilinear
relation can be treated as a linear relation shown in dotted line in
Figure lO, ‘rite slope of the straight line gives an indication of the
sensitivity of the activity as far as its time-cost relation is concerned.
toWflTCg,$bj CtnT
FOR Lfl~t‘rIME
I- N cost
U,
~,1
TiME
Fig. tO. - Activity cost—-time relationship
CO
5.
t COSTS
U’,
U,
0
-u
‘rIME ~
Fig- It . Cost4i-me curve
is simplified by obtaining a plot of a number of alternatives involving
ditl’c’rent costs and duration Fig. II indicates such a set of curves,
derived for Indirect costs, Direct costs and the Total costs, From
the curve for the Total costs, it is possible to obtain minimum total
cost and the project duration for the minimum total cost. This is
the most economical solution.
6,5. The procedure of investigating the etiect of successively
crashing various activities i-s called ‘‘compression’’. As opposed to
this, “d~compression” is the operation of successively increasing the
pr(pec:t darat~onfrom the. ‘‘crashed sol ation’’ and investigating its
effect on cost,
6,6, The complexity of the operations involved makes the
calculations laborious, If the operations are too large, use of com—
putors become inevitable. Activities upto 200—400 can reasonably
he handled manually, hut a larger number needs computors.
<<
Resources (Manpower1
Equipment Scheduling
7
Resources
(Manpower,
Equipment)
Scheduling
<<
CHAPTER 7
Cf sD
C3J3D c717_)
<<
Fig. 12
36 Resources (Manpower~Equipment) Scheduling
Table 2 below depicts the schedule of the project,
TABLE 2
1-2 1 1 5 0 4 4
1-3 3 3 3 0 C) 0 Critical
3~4 4 7 7 3 3 0 Critical
2-4 2 3 7 1 5 4
2-5 3 4 10 1 7 6
45 3 10 10 7 7 0 Critical
Days -~0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
of 5 11 11 8 3 3 3 1 1 1
Days~O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 It)
TotalNo.of 5 6 6 4 5 5 5 4 4 .3
Dl ixe rs
From the ahove example, it is seen how the CPM enables one
to reschedule the project, without prolonging it, within the constraints
of resources availability.
<<
Budgeting and Actual Cost 39
Budgeting and
Actual Cost
<<
CHAPTER 8
<<
ApplIcation of CPM to other 43
related Highway Matters
9
Application of
CPM to other
related Highway
Matters
<<
CHAPTER 9
<<
Advantages of the ApplIcation 49
of CPM to Highway Projects
10
Advantages of
the Application
ofCPMto
Highway Projects
<<
CHAPTER 10
<<
Limitations of CPM 53
11
Limitations of
CPM
<<
CHAFfER 11
<<
Example of a Bridge Project 57
12
Example of a
Bridge Project
<<
CHAPril 12
A1 P1
Fig. 13
Assuming that the indirect costs are 10 pcr cent of the project
and this varies linearly with time, the indirect costfday
— 10% of Rs 13,98, 068 R 6
— 247 = 855
<<
Example of a Road Project 61
13
Example of a
Road Project
<<
CHAFFER 13
<<
Appendices
14
Appendices
<<
Appendix- I
R.C.C. BRIDGE OF 3 SPANS 25 METRES EACU WITU WELL FOUNDATIONS
Activity Description Quantity Normal Cost Remarks
No. Duration in
~ (days) Ks.
<<
Appendix-I (Contd.)
Activity Description Quantity Normal Cost Remarks
Duration in
(days) Ra
10—12 Laying of Bottom Plugs for welt Nos. 162 Cu. m. 4 26,568
A
1 andA,
11—13 —do----- —do--- well !4os. 162 cu.m. 4 26,568
Pi and
12—14 Sand Filling in well Nos. Ai and A2 230.5 Cu. m. 16 2,444
13—15 —i-do— —do—- 230.5 Cu. m. 16 2,444
for well Nos. P1 and P.
14—16 Laying of intermediate plug for well 43 Cu- m. 2 5,719
Nos. A1 and A,
15—17 —do--- —do— forwell 43cu.m. 2 5,719
Nos.P5 and P,
16—18 Erecting abutteriag. laying reinforce- 88.7 cu. m. 8 36,300
meats and concreting of well caps for
well Nos. A1 and A, ~
17—19 —do—~ —do— for well 88.7 cu. m. 8 36,300
Nos. Ps and P.
18—20 Erect n, shuttering, laying reinforce- 39.048 cu. m. 20 25,937
~ ments and concreting of abutment
columns and abutment caps
19—21 —do— —do— for Pier and 87.54 cu. m. 30 29,024
Pier caps
20—22 Fixing of bearing over Abutment caps. 6 Nos. 3 3,000
21—23 —do- —do— over Pier caps 12 Nos. 3 6,000
18—24 Erecting staging. shuttering for super 1 No. 15 36,038
~ structure span 1 ~
19—25 —do— —do—- for span 2 1 No. 15 36,038
<<
Appendix-i (Contd.)
Activity Description Quantity Normal Cost Remarks
Duration in
(days) Rs
24—26 Laying Reinforcements and concreting 148.24 Cu. in. 6 86,882
of superstructure span 1
23—27 —do—- —do-’--- for span 2 148.24cu.m. 6 86,882
26—28 Erecting Railings for span 1 56-75 in. 5 3,177
27—29 —do- —do— for span 2 56.75 5 3,177
26—30 Release of centering and shuttering I No. 22 36,038
from span I and erecting the same for
span 3
30—31 Laying of reinforcements and con- 148.24 en. in. 6 86,882
creting superstructure span 3
31—32 Erecting Railings for span 3 56.75 in 5 3,177
32—36 Laying of Reinforcements and con- Job 6 21,160
creting of wearing coat, fixing drainage
spouts and expansion joints for all
spans
20—33 Erection of shuttering, laying rein- 27.5 m’ 7 20,388
forcement and concreting of R.C.C
Returns
33—34 Earth filling behind abutments 8670 m’ 30 91,902
34—36 Laying of Approach Slab, inclusive 1 2 6,580
11.08 in
of Linked items like soling etc.
Job 30 74,040
33—35 Proteciion works
Total - 13,98,068
<<
Appendix-2
0—1 là 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 Critical
1—2 30 10 10 40 40 0 0 0 Critical
2—3 5 40 45 45 50 5 5 0
2—4 10 40 40 50 50 0 0 0 Critical
2—8 90 40 109 130 199 69 69 0
3—4 0 45 50 45 50 5 5 0
4—5 50 50 52 52 0 0 0 Critical
5—6 3 52 52 55 55 0 0 0 Critical
6—7 3 55 55 58 58 0 0 0 Critical
7—9 3 58 58 61 61 0 0 0 Critical
9—10 75 61 74 136 149 13 0 13
10—12 4 136 149 140 153 13 0 13
12—14 16 140 153 156 169 13 0 13
14—16 2 156 169 158 171 13 0 13
16—18 8 158 . 171 166 179 13 0 13
18—20 20 166 179 186 199 13 0 13
18 — 24 15 166 187 181 202 21 21 0
9—11 78 61 61 139 139 0 0 0 Critical
11—13 4 139 139 143 143 0 0 0 Critical
13—15 16 143 143 159 159 0 0 0 Critical
15—17 2 159 159 161 161 0 0 0 Critical
17—19 8 J61 161 169 169 0 0 0 Critical
19—21 30 169 169 199 199 0 0 0 Critical
19—25 15 169 187 184 202 18 0 18
21—23 3 199 199 202 202 0 0 0 Critical
25—23 0 184 202 184 202 18 18 0
20—22 3 t86 199 189 202 13 0 13
20—3 3 7 186 208 193 215 22 0 22
22—24 0 189 202 189 202 13 13 0
23—4 0 202 202 202 202 0 0 0 Critical
24—26 6 202 202 208 208 0 0 0 Critical
26—28 5 208 236 213 241 28 0 28
<<
71
Appendix-2 (Conid.)
<<
Appendix-3 ~
MODIFIED ACTIVITIES FOR 1LC.C. BRIDGE OF 3 SPANS 25 METRES EACH WITH
WELL FOUNDATIONS
Activity Description Quantity Normal Du- Remarks
No. ration (days)
• 19—21 -‘--do— —do— for Pier and Pier caps. 87.54 cu.m. 30
20—22 FIxing of bearing over Abutment caps. 6 No.. 3
21 —23 —do—- —do— over Pier caps 12 No.. 3
18—24 Erecting, staging, shuttering for superstructure span 1 1 No. 15
19—24 -do— —do— for spans 2 and 3 2Nog. 15
• 24—31 Laying reinforcements and concreting of superstructure ~444.72cu.rn. 6
spans 1,2 and 3
31—32 Erecting railings for spans I, 2 and 3 170.25 m 5
32—36 Laying reinforcements and concreting of wearing coat, Job 6
fixing drainage spouts and expansion joint5 for all spans 5 7
20—33 Erection of shuttering laying reinforcements and concre- 27.5 m
33—34 Earth
ting offillingbehind abutments
R.C.C. returns - 8670 m2 30
34—36 Laying of approach slab, inclusive of linked items like 11.08 in5 2
soling etc.
33 —35 Protection Works Job 30
<<
Appendix-4 ~
WIDENING, STRENGTHENING AND REALIGNING
EXISTING ROAD
<<
Appendix-4 (Con Id.)
Activities Description Quantity Normal Cost Remarks
Duration in
(days) Rs
11—19 Earthwork inclusive of carriage and
compaction in Section I 47,500 cu.m. 45 2,98,100
12—20 —-do— —do-— in Section Il 79,400 cum. 55 4,95,100
13—21 —do— —do— in Section III 69,600 cum. 52 4,35,200
14—22 —do— —do— in Section IV 57,200 cu.m. 48 3,57,100
19—23 Gravel Sub-base in Section 1 1,500 cu.m 10 9,270
20—24 —co— —do— in Section II 1,500 cu.rn 10 9,270
21—25 —do— —do--—- in Section 111 1,500 cu.m. 10 9,270
22—26 —do--— —do— in Section IV 1,500 cu.rn. 10 9,270
23—27 Water Bound Macadam Base course in Section 1 895 cu,m. 20 28,200
24—28 —do--- —do-— in Section II - 895 cum. 20 28,200
25—29 —do— —do— in Section 111 895 cu-rn. 20 28,200
26—30 —do—- —do— in Section IV 895 cujo. 20 28,200
27—31 Water Bound Macadam Top course in
Section 1 895 cu-rn- 20 30,850
28—32 —do— —do— in Section 11 895 cum. . 20 30,850
29—33 -do— —do— in Section 111 895 cum, 20 30,850
30—34 —do— —do— in Section IV 895 cum. 20 30,850
31—35 Providing tack coat in Section I 23,020 sq.rn. 44 14,770
32— 36 —do— —-do— in Section 11 23,020 sq.m. 44 14.770
33— 37 —do— —do— in Section 111 23 .020 sq.m. 44 14,770
-J
34—38 —do— ——do-— in Section IV 23,020 sq.m. 44 14,770 C.”
<<
Appendix-4 (Contd) ~
Activities Description Quantity Normal Cost Remarks
Duration in
(days) Rs
31—39 Providing levelling course of lean bitu-
minous macadam in Section I 765 cu-rn. 45 93.120
32—40 —do— —do— in Section 11 765 cu.m. - 45 93,120
33—41 -do— —do— in Section III 765 cu.m. 45 93,120
34—42 —do— —do— in Section IV 765 cu.m. 45 93,120
39—43 Providing bituminous macadam in Section 1 1.382 cu.m. 80 2,Q4,470
40—44 —do— —do— in Section II 1,382 cum. 80 2,04,470
4l~—45 —do— —do— in Section Ill 1,382 cu.m. 80 2,04,470
42—46 —do— —do— in Section IV 1,382 cu.m. 80 2,04,470
43—47 Semi-Dense Carpet for Section 1 644 cu.m. 40 1,37,230
44—48 ——do— —do— in Section II 644 cu.m. 40 1,37,230
45—49 -do— —do— in Section III 644 cu.m. 40 1,37,230
46—50 —do— —do— in Section IV -644 cu.m. 40 1,37,230
6—51 Construction of Culvert. 15 no.. 60 4,50,000
47—52 Fixing Kilometre Stones, Road Signs in Job 5 5,000
Section 1
48—52 —do— —do— in Section II Job 5 5,000
49—52 —do--- —do— in Section III Job 5 5.000
50—52 —do— —do—- - in Section IV Job 5 5,000
52—53 Finishing and opening Job 5 5,000
44,65,810
<<
Appendix-5
0—I 4 0 10 4 14 10 0 10
0—2 - 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 Critical
0—3 4 0 3 4 7 3 0 3
0—4 4 0 7 4 11 7 0 7
0—5 30 0 - 182 30 212 182 0 182
1—15 7 4 15 11 22 Il 1 10
1—7 4 4 14 8 IX 10 0 10
2—16 7 4 5 11 12 1 1 0
2—8 4 4 4 8 8 0 0 0 Critical
3—17 7 4 8 Ii 15 4 1 3
3—9 4 4 7 8 11 3 0 3
4—18 7 4 12 11 19 8 1 7
4—10 4 4 11 8 15 7 0 7
15—11 0 II 22 11 22 ~ Il 1 10
7—Il 4 8 18 12 22 10 0 10
16—12 0 11 12 Il 12 1 1 0
8—12 4 8 8 12 12 0 0 0 Critical
17—13 0 11 15 II 15 4 1 3
9—13 4 8 Il 12 15 3 0 3
18—14 0 11 19 11 19 8 1 1
10—14 4 8 15 12 19 7 0 7
5—6 15 30 212 45 227 182 0 182
6—51 60 45 227 105 287 182 182 0
11—19 45 12 22 57 67 10 0 10
12—20 55 12 12 67 67 0 0 0 Critical
13—21 52 12 ~5 64 67 3 0. 3
14—22 48 12 19 60 67 - 7 0 7
19-—23 10 57 67 67 77 10 0 10
28—24 10 67 67 77 77 0 0 0 CrItical
21—25 10 64 67 74 77 3 0 3
22—26 10 60 67 70 77 7 0 - 7
23—27 20 67 77 87 97 10 0 10
<<
78
Appendix-5 (Conid.)
24—28 20 77 77 97 97 0 0 0 Critical
25—29 20 74 77 94 97 3 0 3
26—30 20 70 77 90 97 7 0 7
27—31 20 87 97 107 117 10 0 10
28—32 20 97 97 117 117 0 0 0 Critical
29—33 20 94 97 114 117 3 0 3
30—34 20 90 97 110 117 7 0 7
31—35 44 107 118 151 162 ii 0 II
31 —39 45 107 117 152 162 10 0 10
32—36 44 117 118 161 162 1 0 1
32—40 45 117 117 162 162 0 0 0 Critical
33—37 44 114 11~ 158 162 4 0 4
33-—4 I 45 114 117 159 162 3 0 3
34—38 44 110 118 154 162 8 0 8
34—42 45 110 117 155 162 7 0 7
35—39 0 151 162 151 162 11 1 10
36—40 0 161 162 161 162 1 1 0
37—41 0 158 162 158 162 4 1 3
39—42 0 154 162 154 162 8 1 7
39—43 80 152 162 232 242 10 0 10
40—44 80 162 162 242 242 0 0 0 Critical
41 —45 80 159 162 239 242 3 0 3
42—46 80 155 162 235 242 7 0 7
43—47 40 232 242 272 282 10 0 10
44—48 40 242 242 282 282 0 0 0 Critical
45—49 40 239 242 274 282 3 0 3
46_SO 40 235 242 275 282 7 0 7
47—52 5 272 282 277 287 10 10 0
48—52 5 282 282 287 287 0 0 0 Critical
49—52 5 279 282 284 287 3 3 0
50—52 5 275 282 280 287 7~ 7 0
51—52 0 105 287 105 287 182 182 0
52—59 5 287 287 292 292 0 0 0 Critical
<<
BIBLIOGRAPHY
<<
<<
<<
<<
<<
<<