FILAMER CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
Autonomous Status – CHED
GRADUATE SCHOOL
Roxas Avenue, Roxas City 5800, Capiz, Philippines
Tel. No. (036) 6212-317 ; Fax No. (036) 6213-0725
Website: http://www.filamer.edu.ph
Descriptive Linguistics
(Eng.408)
ANAMIE F. DE LA CRUZ DR. MARIA TERESA D. COSICO
MAT- English Professor
Language families and History of languages
The reconstruction of language when it is no longer there is a difficult task. One
distinguishes two methods: comparison between languages, and other internal
reconstruction. The later applied in absence of comparative evidence. One observes
certain irregularities in the language and proposes a solution in terms of a possible
development of the language.
It is observed, for example that irregular inflection is older than regular
inflection. For example in English there are plurals in /en/ (oxen),(vixen) and plurals in
vowel change (women/,mice/). These are predicted by internal reconstruction to reflect
an earlier state of the language where plurals was formed by addition of /en/ and vowel
change and that the plural /s/ was a later development.
Why do a few words take -en instead of -s or -es to become plural? You may
have heard that English is a Germanic language. The -en ending on plurals is something
we get from our German roots. In Old English, some nouns were made plural with -
s and -es as they are today, but many nouns took -en to become plural.
The s-form plurals became dominant in northern England first, while the en-form
hung on in southern England. By the 14th century the s-form became dominant
everywhere, but people didn't let go of the en-form completely; as late as the 16th
century the plural of eye was eyen and the plural of hose was hosen. Today only a
few en-forms survive; the most common are oxen and children. And, of course, another
Germanic way of forming plurals is by vowel change, as in mouse -> mice, man ->
men, woman -> women (double vowel change, in fact, but not reflected in the
spelling!), goose -> geese etc.
Likewise, this method predicts that the comparative in English was once formed
using /er/ and /est/, but at some point got replaced by forms involving /more/ and
/most/. In both cases, German reflects the earlier stage of English.