CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

SESSION 2018-2019

JURISDICTION OF COURT IN CIVIL CASEs (SECTION 9)

SUBMITTED TO: Dr. Karan Jawanda

SUBMITTED BY: Vishal Gahlot

CLASS : B.Com. LL.B.

ROLL NO. : 175/15

SECTION :C

Page | 1 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................................................................................ 3

Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4

Jurisdiction of Civil Court under Civil Procedure Code (Section 9) ......................................... 5

Suit of civil nature...................................................................................................................... 6

Cognizance not barred ............................................................................................................... 9

Who may decide? ..................................................................................................................... 10

Presumption as to jurisdiction .................................................................................................. 10

Burden of proof ........................................................................................................................ 10

Exclusion of jurisdiction: Limitations ..................................................................................... 11

Exclusion of jurisdiction of civil court: Principles .................................................................. 13

General principles .................................................................................................................... 15

Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 16

BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 17

 Books Referred ............................................................................................................. 17

 Websites referred .......................................................................................................... 17

Page | 2 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I, Vishal Gahlot, would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my Teacher, Dr. Karan
Jawanda ma’am as well as our Director who gave me the golden opportunity to do this
wonderful project on ‘Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil cases’, which helped me in doing a lot of
Research and I came to know about so many new things. I am really grateful to them for this
learning curve.

I would like to extend my acknowledgement towards them for their valuable criticism and
benevolent assistance as well as consistent support throughout the phase of this project
compiling.

All and all thanks to everyone who helped me with the creative and new ideas which made this
project both an eye candy and soul food through their application of brain, eventually as a
consequence, this spectacular and educational project got finalized in the limited timeframe
previously granted.

Page | 3 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Introduction

Jurisdiction (from the Latin, iuris meaning "law" and dicere meaning "to speak") is the practical
authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political leader to deal with and
make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a
defined area of responsibility. The term is also used to denote the geographical area or subject-
matter to which such authority applies.

Jurisdiction draws its substance from public international law, conflict of laws, constitutional
law and the powers of the executive and legislative branches of government to allocate
resources to best serve the needs of its native society.

The District Court or Additional District court exercises jurisdiction both on original and
appellate side in civil and criminal matters arising in the District. The territorial and pecuniary
jurisdiction in civil matters is usually set in concerned state enactments on the subject of civil
courts. On the criminal side jurisdiction is almost exclusively derived from code of criminal
procedure. This code sets the maximum sentence which a district court may award which
currently is capital punishment.

The court exercises appellate jurisdiction over all subordinate courts in the district on both civil
and criminal matters. These subordinate courts usually consist of a Junior Civil Judge court,
Principal Junior civil Judge court, Senior civil judge court (often called sub court)in the order
of ascendancy on the civil side and the Judicial Magistrate Court of IInd Class, Judicial
Magistrate Court of Ist class, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in the order of ascendancy on the
criminal side.

Certain matters on criminal or civil side cannot be tried by a court inferior in jurisdiction to a
district court if the particular enactment makes a provision to the effect. This gives the District
Court original jurisdiction in such matters.1

1
http://ijtr.nic.in/article_chairman2.pdf

Page | 4 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Jurisdiction of Civil Court under Civil Procedure Code (Section 9)

Section 9 of CPC deals with the jurisdiction of civil courts in India. It says that the courts shall
(subject to the provisions herein contained) have jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature
excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.

Explanation I- a suit in which the right to property or to an office is contested is a suit or a civil
nature, notwithstanding that such right may depend entirely on the decision of questions as to
religious rites or ceremonies.

Explanation II- for the purpose of this section, it is immaterial whether or not any fees are
attached to the office referred to in explanation I or whether or not such office is attached to a
particular place.2

Conditions:

A civil court has jurisdiction to try a suit if two conditions are fulfilled:

 The suit must be of a civil nature; and

 The cognizance of such a suit should not have been expressly or impliedly barred.

2
https://indiacode.nic.in/acts/

Page | 5 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Suit of civil nature

1) Meaning:
In order that a civil court may have jurisdiction to try a suit, the first condition which
must be satisfied is that the suit must be of a civil nature? The word ‘civil’ has not been
defined in the code. But according to the dictionary meaning, it pertains to private rights
and remedies of a citizen as distinguished from criminal, political, etc. the word ‘nature’
has been defined as ‘the fundamental qualities of a person or thing; identity or essential
character; sort, kind, character’’3. It is thus wider in content. The expression ‘civil
nature’ is wider than the expression ‘civil proceedings’. Thus, a suit is of a civil is of a
nature if the principal question therein relates to the determination of a civil right and
enforcement thereof. It is not the status of the parties to the suit, but the subject matter
of it which determines whether or not the suit is of a civil nature.

2) Nature and scope:

The expression “suit of a civil nature” will cover private rights and obligations of a
citizen. Political and religious questions are not covered by that expression. A suit in
which the principal question relates to caste or religion is not a suit of a civil nature.
But if the principal question in a suit is of a civil nature (the right to property or to an
office) and the adjudication incidentally involves the determination relating to a caste
question or to religious rights and ceremonies, it does not cease to be a suit of a civil
nature and the jurisdiction of a civil court is not barred.4 The court has jurisdiction to
adjudicate upon those questions also in order to decide the principal question which is
of a civil nature. Explanation II has been added by the amendment act of 1976. Before
this explanation, there was a divergence of judicial opinion as to whether a suit relating
to a religious office to which no fees or emoluments were attached can be said to be a
suit of a civil nature. But the legal position has now been clarified by explanation II
which specifically provides that a suit relating to a religious office is maintainable
whether or not it carries any fees or whether or not it is attached to a particular place.

3) Doctrine explained:

3
Supra Note 1
4
Private International Law (8th ed.) at p. 368

Page | 6 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Explaining the concept of jurisdiction of civil courts under section 9, in PMA

Metropolitan v. M.M. Marthoma5, the Supreme Court stated:

“The expensive nature of the section is demonstrated by use of phraseology both

positive and negative. The earlier part opens the door widely and latter debars entry to
only those which are expressly or impliedly barred. The two explanations, one existing
from inception and later added in 1976, bring out clearly the legislative intention of
extending operation of the section to religious matters where right to property or office
is involved irrespective of whether any fee is attached to the office or not. The language
used is simple but explicit and clear. It is structured on the basic of a civilized
jurisprudence that absence of machinery for enforcement of right renders it nugatory.
The heading which is normally a key to the section brings out unequivocally that all
civil suits are cognizable unless bared. What is meant by it is explained further by
widening the ambit of the section by use of the word ‘shall’ and the expression ‘all suits
of a civil nature unless expressly or impliedly barred’

Each word and expression casts an obligation on the court to exercise jurisdiction for
enforcement of rights. The word shall makes it mandatory. No court can refuse to
entertain a suit if it is of the description mentioned in the section. That is amplified by
the use of the expression. ‘All suits of civil nature’. The word civil according to the
dictionary means, relating to the citizen as an individual; civil rights.’ In Black’s legal
dictionary it is defined as, ‘relating to provide rights and remedies sought by civil
actions as contrasted with criminal proceedings’. In law it is understood as an antonym
of criminal. Historically the two broad classifications were civil and criminal. Revenue,
tax and company etc. were added to it later. But they too pertain to the larger family of
civil. There is thus no doubt about the width of the word civil. Its width has been
stretched further by using the word nature along with it. That is even those suits are
cognizable which are not only civil but are even of civil nature….

The word ‘nature’ has defined as ‘the fundamental qualities of a person or thing;
identity or essential character, sort; kind; character’. It is thus wider in content. The
word ‘civil nature’ is wider that the word ‘civil proceeding’. The section would,

5
1995 AIR 2001

Page | 7 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

therefore, be available in every case where the dispute was of the characteristics of
affecting one’s rights which are not only civil but of civil nature.”

4) Test:
A suit in which the right to property or to an office is contested is a suit of a civil nature,
notwithstanding that such right may depend entirely on the decision of a question as to
religious rites or ceremonies.6

5) Suits of civil nature: illustrations- the following are suits of a civil nature.
 suits relating to rights to property;
 suits relating to rights of worship;
 suits relating to taking out of religious procession;
 suits relating to right to share in offerings;
 suits for damages for civil wrongs;
 suits for specific performance of contracts or for damages for breach of contracts;

6) Suits not of civil nature: illustrations- the following are not suits of a civil nature:
 suits involving principally caste questions;
 suits involving purely religious rites or ceremonies;
 suits for upholding mere dignity or honor;
 suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings;
 Suits against expulsions from caste, etc.

6
Sinha Ramanuja v. Ranga Ramanuja, AIR 1961 SC 1720: (1962) 2 SCR 509

Page | 8 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Cognizance not barred

As stated above, a litigant having a grievance of a civil nature has a right to institute a civil suit
unless its cognizance is barred, either expressly or impliedly.

1) Suits expressly barred:

A suit is said to be ‘expressly barred’ when it is barred by any enactment for the time
being in force. It is open to a competent legislature to bar jurisdiction of civil courts
with respect to a particular class of suits of a civil nature, provided that, in doing so, it
keeps itself within the field of legislation conferred on it and does not contravene any
provision of the constitution.
But every presumption should be made in favor of the jurisdiction of a civil court and
the provision of exclusion of jurisdiction of a court must be strictly construed. If there
is any doubt about the ousting of jurisdiction of a civil court, the court will lean to an
interpretation which would maintain the jurisdiction.7 Thus, matters falling within the
exclusive jurisdiction of revenue courts or under the code of criminal procedure or
matters dealt with by special tribunals under the relevant statutes, e.g. by industrial
tribunal, income tax tribunal, revenue tribunal, electronic tribunal, rent tribunal,
cooperative tribunal, motor accident claims tribunal, etc. or by domestic tribunals, e.g.
Bar Council, Medical Council, university, club etc. are expressly barred from the
cognizance of a civil court. But if the remedy provided by a statute is not adequate and
all questions cannot be decided by a special tribunal, the jurisdiction of a civil court is
not barred. Similarly, when a court of limited jurisdiction prima facie and incidentally
states something, the jurisdiction of a civil court to finally decide the time is not ousted.

2) Suits impliedly barred:

A suit is said to be impliedly barred when it is barred by general principles of law.
Where a specific remedy is given by a statute, it thereby deprives the person who insists
upon a remedy of any other form than that given by the statute. Where an act creates an
obligation and enforces its performance in a specified manner, that performance cannot
be enforced in any other manner.

7
Authors lecture on administrative law

Page | 9 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Similarly, certain suits, though of a civil nature, are barred from thee cognizance of a
civil court on the ground of public policy. “The principle underlying is that a court
ought not to countenance matters which are injurious to and against the public weal.”
Thus, no suit shall lie for recovery of costs incurred in criminal prosecution or for
enforcement of a right upon a contract hit by section 23 of the Indian Contract Act,
1872; or against any judge for acts done in the course of his duties.
Likewise, political questions belong to the domain of public administrative law and are
outside the jurisdiction of civil courts. A civil court has no jurisdiction to adjudicate
upon disputes of a political nature.

Who may decide?

It is well settled that a civil court has inherited power to decide its own jurisdiction.

Presumption as to jurisdiction
In dealing with the question whether a civil court’s jurisdiction to entertain a suit is barred or
not, it is necessary to bear in mind that every presumption should be made in favor of the
jurisdiction of a civil court. The exclusion of jurisdiction of a civil court to entertain civil causes
should not be readily inferred unless the relevant statute contains an express provision to that
effect, or leads to a necessary and inevitable implication of the nature.

Burden of proof
It is well- settled that it is for the party who seeks to oust the jurisdiction of a civil court to
establish it. It is equally well settled that a statute ousting the jurisdiction of a civil court must
be strictly construed. Where such a contention is raised, it has to be determined in the light of
the words used in the statute, the scheme of the relevant provisions and the object and purpose
of the enactment. In the case of a doubt as to jurisdiction, the court should lean towards the
assumption of jurisdiction. A civil court has inherent power to decide the question of its own
jurisdiction; although as a result of such inquiry it may turn out that it has no jurisdiction to
entertain the suit.8

8
ibid

Page | 10 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Exclusion of jurisdiction: Limitations

A litigation having a grievance of a civil nature has, independent of any statute, a right to
institute a suit in a civil court unless its cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred. The
exclusion of the jurisdiction of a civil court is not to be readily inferred and such exclusion
must be clear.

Again, even when the jurisdiction of a civil court is barred, either expressly or by necessary
implication, it cannot be said that the jurisdiction is altogether excluded. A court has
jurisdiction to examine whether the provisions of the act and the rules made thereunder have
or have not been complied with, or the order is contrary to law, malafide, ultra vires, perverse,
arbitrary, ‘purported’, violative of the principles of natural justice, or is based on ‘no evidence’
and so on. In all these cases, the order cannot be said to be under the act but is de hors the act
and the jurisdiction of a civil court is not ousted. In the leading decision of Secretary of State
v. Mask & Co.9, the Privy Council rightly observed:

“It is settled law that the exclusion of the jurisdiction of the civil court is not to be readily
inferred, but that such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied. It is also
well established that even if jurisdiction is so excluded the civil courts have jurisdiction to
examine into cases where the provisions of the act have not been complied with, or the statutory
tribunal has not acted in conformity with the fundamental principles of judicial procedure.”

It is respectfully submitted that the following observations of Subba Rao, J.(as he then was) in
the leading case of Radha Kishan v. Ludhiyana Municipality10 lay down the correct legal
position regarding jurisdiction of civil courts and require to be produced:

“Under section 9 of the civil procedure code the court shall have jurisdiction to try all suits of
civil nature excepting suits of which cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred. A
statute, therefore, expressly or by necessary implication can bar the jurisdiction of civil courts
in respect of a particular matter. The mere conferment of special jurisdiction on a tribunal in
respect of the said matter does not in itself exclude the jurisdiction of civil courts. The statute
may specifically provide for ousting the jurisdiction of civil courts; even if there was no such
specific exclusion, if it creates liability not existing before and gives a special and particular

9
(1940) 42 BOMLR 767
10
1963 AIR 1547

Page | 11 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

remedy for the aggrieved party, the remedy provided by it must be followed. The same
principle would apply if the statute had provided for the particular forum in which the remedy
could be had. Even in such cases, the civil court’s jurisdiction is not completely ousted. A suit
in a civil court will always lie to question the order of a tribunal created by statute, even if its
order is, expressly or by necessary implication, made final, if the said tribunal abuses its power
or does not act under the act but in violation of its provisions.”

Page | 12 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Exclusion of jurisdiction of civil court: Principles

From the above discussion it is clear that the jurisdiction of civil courts is all- embracing except
to the extent it is excluded by law or by clear intendment arising from such law.

In the classic decision of Dhulabhai v. State of M.P.11, after considering a number of cases,
Hidyatullah, C.J. summarized the following principles relating to the exclusion of jurisdiction
of civil courts:

a) Where a statute gives finality to orders of special tribunals, the civil courts jurisdiction
must be held to be excluded if there is adequate remedy to do what the civil courts
would normally do in a suit. Such a provision, however, does not exclude those cases
where the provisions of a particular act have not been complied with or the statutory
tribunal has not acted in conformity with fundamental principles of judicial procedure.

b) Where there is an express bar of jurisdiction of a court, an examination of the scheme

of a particular act to find the adequate or sufficiency of the remedies provided may be
relevant but this is not decisive for sustaining the jurisdiction of a civil court

c) Where there is no express exclusion, the examination of the remedies and the scheme
of a particular act to find out the intendment becomes necessary and the result of the
inquiry may be decisive. In the latter case, it is necessary to see if a statute creates a
special right or a liability and provides for the determination of the right or liability and
further lays down that all questions about the said right and liability shall be determined
by tribunals so constituted, and whether remedies normally associated with actions in
civil courts are prescribed by the said statute or not.

d) Challenge to the provisions of a particular act as ultra vires cannot be brought before
tribunals constituted under that act. Even the high court cannot go into that question on
a revision or reference from decisions of tribunals.

e) When a provision is already declared unconstitutional or the constitutionality of any

provisions is to be challenged, a suit is open. A writ of certiorari may include a direction

11
1969 AIR 78

Page | 13 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

for refund if the claim is clearly within the time prescribed by the limitation act but it
is not a compulsory remedy to replace a suit.

f) Where the particular act contains no machinery for refund of tax collected in excess of
constitutional limits or is illegally collected, a suit lies.

g) Questions of the correctness of an assessment, apart from its constitutionality, are for
the decision of the authorized and a civil suit does not lie if the orders of the authorities
are declared to be final or there is an express prohibition in a particular act. In either
case, the scheme of a particular act must be examined because it is a relevant enquiry.

h) An exclusion of jurisdiction of a civil court is not readily to be inferred unless the

conditions above set down apply. The above principles enunciated are relevant in
deciding the correctness or otherwise of assessment orders made under taxing statutes.

Page | 14 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

General principles

From various decisions of the Supreme Court, the following general principles relating to
jurisdiction of a civil court emerge:

1. A civil court has jurisdiction to try all suits of a civil nature unless their cognizance is
barred either expressly or impliedly.
2. Consent can neither confer nor take away jurisdiction of a court.
3. A decree passed by a court without jurisdiction is a nullity and the validity thereof can
be challenged at any stage of the proceedings, in execution proceedings or even in
collateral proceedings.
4. There is a distinction between want of jurisdiction and irregular exercise thereof.
5. Every court has inherent power to decide the question of its own jurisdiction.
6. Jurisdiction of a court depends upon the averments made in a plaint and not upon the
defense in a written statement.
7. For deciding jurisdiction of a court, substance of a matter and not its form is important.
8. Every presumption should be made in favor of jurisdiction of a civil court.
9. A statute ousting jurisdiction of a court must be strictly construed.
10. Burden of proof of exclusion of jurisdiction of a court is on the party who asserts it.
11. Even where jurisdiction of a civil court is barred, it can still decide whether the
provisions of an act have been complied with or whether an order was passed de hors
the provisions of law.

Page | 15 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

Conclusion

From the above contents of my project it can be concluded that section 9 at ‘the threshold of
the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) primarily deals with the question of civil court’s jurisdiction
to entertain a cause. It lays down that subject to what are contained in section 10,11, 12, 13,
47, 66, 83, 84, 91, 92, 115, etc., civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit of civil nature
except when its cognizance is expressly barred or barred by necessary implication. Civil court
has jurisdiction to decide the question of its jurisdiction although as a result of the enquiry it
may eventually turn out that it has no jurisdiction over the matter. Civil court has jurisdiction
to examine whether tribunal and quasi- judicial bodies or statutory authority acted within there
jurisdiction. But once it is found that such authority, e.g., certificate officer had initial
jurisdiction, then any erroneous order by him is not open to collateral attack in a suit. Because
there is an essential and marked distinction between the cases in which courts lack jurisdiction
to try cases and where jurisdiction is irregularly exercised by courts.

Page | 16 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases

 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 Books Referred
1. C.K. Takwani, Civil Procedure, 18th ed. (2017), Eastern Book Company
2. M.P. Jain; The Code of Civil Procedure (2007), Wadhawa Publications, Nagpur
3. Avtar Singh; Code of Civil Procedure(1st ed.) 2008 Central Law Publications

 Websites referred
1. www.scconline.com
2. www.indiankanoon.org
3. www.google.co.in
4. http://www.lexusnexus.com/in/legal
5. http://www.jstor.com

Page | 17 Jurisdiction of Courts in Civil Cases