Modeling and Analysis of Bridges PICE Manila May 2009
Modeling and Analysis of Bridges PICE Manila May 2009
By
Naveed Anwar, D. Eng
In Association with
Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA
Asian Center for Engineering Computations and Software
is part of
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
9:45 – 12:00
Modeling Tendering
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
System Selection
Analysis Construction
Concept Design
Design Management
Value Engineering
Detailing Erection
Maintenance Management
Retrofitting Monitoring
Rehabilitation Evaluation
Bridge Design Problem
• Category-1
– Small to medium size roadway and waterway
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Conceptual Design
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Preliminary Design
Geometric Design
Modeling and Analysis
Component Design
Detailing
Drafting
Documentation
Engineering,
Preliminary Design Standard Database and Libraries, Expert Systems
Preliminary
ANSYS/Civil FEM Bridges
Design
Geometric SAP 2000 Bridge Modular, ANSYS/Civil FEM Bridges, Bridgade, LEAP
Design Bridge, QConBridge, SAM, MIDAS-WinBDS, RM2006
SAP 2000 Bridge Modular, ANSYS/Civil FEM Bridges, Bridgade, LUSAS
Modeling and
Bridge, LEAP Bridge, RM2006, SAM, STRAP AutoBridge, ACES, MIDAS-
Analysis
WinBDS
SAP 2000 Bridge Modular, ANSYS/Civil FEM Bridges, RM2006, LUSAS
Component
Bridge, LEAP Bridge, QConBridge, SAM, STRAP AutoBridge, ACES,
Design
MIDAS-WinBDS
Detailing SAP 2000 Bridge Modular, ANSYS/Civil FEM Bridges, Bridgade, RM2006
Drafting LEAP-Bridge, MIDAS-WinBDS
Specific Issues in
Bridge Modeling and Analysis
Developments
tensioning etc.
different load cases
and combinations This also leads to a very large number of load combinations to be considered
in member design.
Extensive Several of the major bridge systems, such as cable stayed, suspension, tied
arch, cantilever, stressed ribbon etc. possess high degree of non linearity due
nonlinearity to the presence of cables, coupled effect of creep, differential movements,
inherently present in relaxation etc.
the structure itself
Many long span bridges with flexible decks are susceptible to flutter, vortex
shedding and even hyper elasticity with significant interaction between
structure and wind.
Complexities due to
wind induced forces Not many software are capable to handle wind analysis properly, and often
and motion wind tunnel tests are carried out to supplement the analysis.
Special Issues
connections Most of the joints and bearings behave in a highly non linear
manner. Only software that has the capability of handling non-
linear links and connections can be used effectively.
Special Issues and Specific Modeling
Problems
Special problems passive response, the soil structure interaction combined with
involved in the modeling the non-linearity of the bearings, anchor blocks, restraining
blocks etc. complicate the behavior and hence modeling and
of abutments and analysis.
foundation
• Modeling of Deck
– The extent of deck model and level of detail. Several models
may be needed
– Composite action, transverse load transfer, tensional
stiffness and modeling
– Axial forces in the entire deck, stiffening and softening
Cable Stayed and Suspension Bridges
• Modeling of Pylons
– Modeling the flexibility and stability
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Modeling of Foundations
– Very large loads and moments from pylons
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
response
Mu&& + Cu& + Ku
• Non-linear Analysis
– P-Delta Analysis
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
– Buckling Analysis
– Static Pushover Analysis
– Sequential Construction Analysis
– Fast Non-Linear Analysis (FNA)
– Large Displacement Analysis
– Sequential construction/ staged analysis
• Dynamic Analysis
– Free Vibration and Modal Analysis
– Response Spectrum Analysis
– Steady State Dynamic Analysis
– Forced vibration
Developments in FE Modeling
• Level-1
– Mostly developed and in use before the 1980s
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Constraints
• Restraints
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Springs
• Nonlinear Links
• Nonlinear Hinges
• Element End Conditions
• Dummy elements
Restraints - Supports
linked
• Rigid-body behavior
– Rigid Body: fully rigid for all displacements
– Rigid Diaphragm: rigid for membrane behavior
– Rigid Plate: rigid for plate bending in a plane
– Rigid Rod: rigid for extension along an axis
– Rigid Beam: rigid for beam bending on an axis
• Equal-displacement behavior
• Symmetry and anti-symmetry conditions
End Releases
“End-Release”
– Axial
– Shear
– Torsion
– Moment
SAP2000
Rigid End Offsets
SAP2000
Non-Linear Links
• Special elements to
capture the Non-Linear
behavior
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
– Multi-Linear Elastic
– Multi-Linear Plastic
– Damper
– Gap
– Hook
– Contact
– Rubber Isolators
– Friction Isolators
SAP2000
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Nonliner Links
SAP2000
Link/Support Element
• Friction Isolator
– Biaxial friction-pendulum
isolator that has coupled
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
friction
– properties for the two
shear deformation, post-
slip stiffness
– in the shear direction due
to the pendulum radii of
the
– slipping surfaces, gap
behavior in the axial
direction, and
– linear effective-stiffness
properties for the three
moment deformations
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Typical Bridge
Super Deck
Deck Slab
Slab and
and Girders
Girders
Super
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Deck
Deck Diaphragms
Diaphragms
Structure
Structure Approach
Approach Slab
Slab
Bearings
Bearings
Pier
Pier Bents
Bents and
and Transom
Transom (Cross
(Cross Beam)
Beam)
Abutments
Abutments Pier,
Pier, Pylon
Pylon
Sub
Sub Wing
Wing Wall
Wall
Structure
Structure
(Pile
(Pile Cap)
Cap)
Foundations
Foundations (Piles,
(Piles, Caissons)
Caissons)
(Footing)
(Footing)
Barriers,
Barriers, Side
Side Walk
Walk
Ancillary
Ancillary Systems
Systems Expansion
Expansion Joints
Joints
Lighting,
Lighting, Draining
Draining
Modeling of Bridge Components
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling of Deck
Basic Deck Types
• Simple RC Slab
• RC Slab and RC Beams
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Beam Model
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Grid Model
• Grid-Plate Model
• Plate-Shell Model
• Solid Model
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Beam Model
Grid Model
• Girders, Slab,
Diaphragm etc are all
converted to equivalent
beams
Beam-Plate Model
+h
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges Beam-Plate Model
Shell Model
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges Shell Model of Box Girder Bridge
Modeling of Loads
Modeling of Bridge s
Bride Load Classification
• Static, Dynamic
• Permanent, Transient
• Deterministic, Non-Deterministic
• Environmental, Man-made
• Short term, Long Term
Loads on Bridge Deck
• Gravity Loads
• Traffic and Highway Loads
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Pre-stressing Loads
• Temperature Loads
• Shrinkage and Creep
• Wind Load
• Seismic Load
Modeling Loads
P
• Point Load
• Line Load
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
(X,Z)
Y
X Z • Area Load
• Volume Load
W1
W
W2 (X1,Z1 (X1,Z1) (X3,Z3)
)
Y Y
Z (X2,Z2 (X2,Z2)
X X (X4,Z4)
) Z
Gravity Loads
– Vehicle Classes
– Traffic Lanes 10’0”
considered
• In case of Beam model
– The temperature loads to any member can be
applied as a form of fixed end moment caused by
the temperature changes.
automatically included
• Load Balancing analysis is not required
• Effect of prestressing on the entire structure
is evaluated including the continuity,
stiffness, shortening, shear lag, eccentricities,
etc.
• Most software have the ability to compute
stresses and stress profiles for computed
actions so no separate stress calculations are
needed
Why to use Integrated Approach?
comprehensively
• Prestressed structures are more suitable and
relevant for linear-elastic analysis mostly
used by general FEM Software
• The interaction of axial load, moment and
prestress load can be considered more
consistently
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
1:00 – 3:00
F
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Elastomeric Bearing
Shear Modulus G
V1 ? V2 ?
Bridge Bearings
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Hinges
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Pot Bearings
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Pot Bearings
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Elastomeric Pads
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Expansion Joints
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Z
X
Bearing Example - 1
How to Model this?
Modeling of Joints and Bearings
of Freedom (DOF)
• This is suitable for fully connected structural
members
• At Joints, full connection may not be available
or desired
• We can either “release” or “constrain” the
DOF to change this default behavior and to
model joints
Bearing and Expansion Joints
• Degrees-of-freedom representing
discontinuous components must be
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
disconnected
2 5 6 3
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
4 Joints 4,5,6:
Same Coordinates
Equal Y-Translation
Equal Z-Translation
Equal X-Rotation
Joints 4,6:
1
Equal X-displacement
Moment release
2 4 3
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Joint
Pier
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
• Single Pier
– Solid concrete sections and Hollow section
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Pier Types
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Piers Sections
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling Piers
Shell Model of Bridge Pier
Solid element
model
Solid element
model
Foundations
Modeling of Supports
• Actual Supports
– Isolated Footings
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
– Combined Footings
– Rafts
– Pile Cap
– Special Supports
– Pile Piers
– Caissons
Modeling of Supports in 2D
Support Models
Fixed
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
LLL
Pin
LLF
Roller
Elastic
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Modeling of Footings
Beam Plate Brick
Constraint
Yes Yes Yes
Soil
Footing as Plate
Footing as Brick
Raft as Plate, Soil as Brick
• Vertical Deflection
Patterns
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Inclined Supports
• 1st Method:
– Use an additional
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
hf Water level
Bearings,
Piers,
Footings,
Piles
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges Modeling Options for Foundations
Solid elements
to model soil
around a
Caisson with Shell Elements caisson
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges Pilecap Modeling
a=1.6 a=1.6
P=10,000 kN
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
d=1.4
L=2.5 L=2.5
1
α = tan-1 d/0.5L
α = tan-1 d/0.5(L-d1)
α = 48 deg α = 68.5 deg
T = 0.5P/tanα T = 0.5P/tanα
T = 1970 kN
T = 4502 kN
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Abutments
Modeling of Bridge Components
Modeling Issues
3:15 – 4:00
SAM
RM2006
Bridge
Ansys\Civil FEM
LUSAS-Bridge
Leap-Bridge
ADAPT-ABI
Midas-WinBDS
BRIGADE
QConBridge
SAP2000-Bridge
SOFTWARE FEATURES
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Bridge Layout •
Preliminary
•
Design
Geometric
• • • • • • • • • •
Design
Arch Bridge • • • • • • • • • •
Segmental Bridge • • • • • • • •
Slab Deck Bridge • • • • • • • • • •
Bridge Model Box Girder Bridge • • • • • • • •
Cable Stayed Bridge • • • • • • • •
Suspension Bridge • • • • • • •
Integral Bridge • • • •
Features and Comparison of Software
Bridge
Ansys\Civil FEM
Leap-Bridge
ADAPT-ABI
SAM
Midas-WinBDS
LUSAS-Bridge
BRIGADE
RM2006
QConBridge
SAP2000-Bridge
SOFTWARE FEATURES
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Static • • • • • • • • • •
Dynamic • • • • • •
Structural Heat Transfer • •
Analysis Construction Sequence • • • • • • • •
Soil-structure
• •
Interaction
Moving Load • • • • • • • • •
Loads Prestressing • • • • • • • •
Creep/Shrinkage • • • • • • •
Features and Comparison of Software
Bridge
Ansys\Civil FEM
LUSAS-Bridge
Leap-Bridge
ADAPT-ABI
SAM
Midas-WinBDS
BRIGADE
RM2006
QConBridge
Bridge
SAP2000-
SOFTWARE FEATURES
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Abutments • • • • • • • •
Component
Design
Piers and Columns • • • • • • • •
Foundations • • • • • • • •
Features and Comparison of Software
SAM
Midas-WinBDS
Bridge
Ansys\Civil FEM
LUSAS-Bridge
Leap-Bridge
ADAPT-ABI
BRIGADE
RM2006
QConBridge
SAP2000-Bridge
SOFTWARE FEATURES
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
AASHTO Standard • • • • • • • • •
BS-5440-2 • • •
Design Code LFD & LRFD
• • • • • •
Standard
CFD Code •
Detailing
Drafting • • • •
Documentation • • • • • •
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
SAP2000
Bridge Module
SAP2000
– Sequential Construction
• Special CALTRANS bridge modeler
– Step-by-step Modeler
• The full Object Based Bridge Modeler
– Step-by-step Modeler
– General Parametric Modeler
SAP2000-Object Based Bridge Modeler
• Applicable to most
typical and Category-1
bridge projects
• Especially useful for
preliminary and
comparative studies of
various options
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Elevation
Horizontal Layout
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Abutment Modeling
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Pier Bents
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Diaphragm Model
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Hinge/Joint Modeling
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Parametric Variations
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Bridge Objects
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Super Elevation
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Prestressing Tendons
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Prestressing Losses
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Load Cases
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
Analysis Cases
Modeling Analysis and Design of Bridges
– Topographical
– environmental
– geological and geotechnical and
– service lines and related aspects that exist before the
design and construction of the bridge
• The second level information model contains
– the proposed functional
– geometric design of the bridge
– including the overall alignment, planned services,
roadway modifications etc
Multi-scale Design Approach
Hierarchal Multi-scale
Design Approach for
Bridge Design
Conclusions
Thank You