0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views16 pages

Operating Systems: Syed Mansoor Sarwar

Uploaded by

Ibrahim Choudary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views16 pages

Operating Systems: Syed Mansoor Sarwar

Uploaded by

Ibrahim Choudary
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Operating

Systems
Lecture 16
Syed Mansoor Sarwar
Agenda for Today
 Review of previous lecture
 SJF is optimal

 Round-Robin scheduling

 Multi-level queues scheduling

 Multi-level feedback queues


scheduling
 Recap of lecture
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Review of Lecture 15
 Shortest-Job-First (SJF)
 Shortest-Remaining-Time-First
(SRTF)
 Exponential averaging

 Priority scheduling

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
Review of Lecture 15
 Exponential Averaging
n+1 = tn + (1- ) n
for  = ½
n+1 = tn/2 + tn-1/22 + tn-2/23 + tn-3/24 + …

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
SJF is Optimal
 Logical Argument: Decrease in
the wait times for short processes
is much more than increase in the
wait times for long processes
P1 P2 P3
5 3 2

P3 P2 P1
2 3 5
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Round Robin (RR)
 Each process gets a small unit
of CPU time, called time slice or
quantum, which is usually 10-
100 milliseconds. After this
time has elapsed, the process
is preempted and added to the
end of the ready queue.
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Round Robin (RR)
 If there are n processes in the
ready queue, the time quantum
is q, and context switch time is
tcs, then no process waits more
than (n-1)(q+tcs) time units
 Used in time-sharing systems
where response time is an
important performance criteria
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Round Robin (RR)
Performance
 q large  FCFS
 q small  q must be large with
respect to context
switch, otherwise
overhead is too high.
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Round Robin Example
Process Burst Time
P1 53 — 33 — 13
P2 17
P3 68 — 48 — 28 — 8
P4 24 — 4
 The Gantt chart with quantum 20 is:
P1 P2 P3 P4 P1 P3 P4 P1 P3 P3

0 20 37 57 77 97 117 121 134 154 162

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
Round Robin Example
Process Turnaround Time Waiting Time
P1 134 134 – 53 = 81
P2 37 37 – 17 = 20
P3 162 162 – 68 = 94
P4 121 121 – 24 = 97
 Average waiting time = 73
 Average waiting time for SJF = 38
 Typically, higher average turnaround
than SJF, but better response.
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Quantum vs Context
Switch

Process Time = 10 Quantum Context


Switches

12 0

6 1

1 9

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
Turnaround Time vs
Quantum

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
Multilevel Queues
 Ready queue is partitioned into
separate queues:
- foreground (interactive)
- background (batch)
 Each queue has its own priority
and scheduling algorithm:
- foreground – RR
- background – FCFS
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Multilevel Queues
 Scheduling must be done across
queues.
 Fixed priority scheduling; i.e.,
serve all from foreground then
from background.
 Time slice – each queue gets a
certain percentage of CPU time,
e.g., 80% to foreground in RR
and 20% to background in FCFS
14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of
Pakistan
Multilevel Queues

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan
Recap of Lecture
 SJF is optimal
 Round-Robin scheduling

 Multi-level queues scheduling

14 September 2019 © Copyright Virtual University of


Pakistan

You might also like