Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20.

ISBN 0 7310 3663 8 1

A Phylogenetic Study of the Parrotfishes

Family Scaridae (Pisces: Labroidei), with a
Revision of Genera

DAVID R. BELLWOOD

Department of Marine Biology, James Cook University of North Queensland,

Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia

ABSTRACT. The comparative morphology of the family Scaridae was examined to provide data
which were used to i) assess the monophyly of the family, ii) identify groups of species within
the family, and iii) determine the phylogenetic relationships of these groups. Analyses were based
on examinations of 69 of the 80 species of Scaridae recognised in this study. In addition, five
outgroup taxa from the family Labridae were examined. A total of 143 characters coded as 334
character states were used in the analyses. The characters were drawn from the osteology of the
neurocranium, oral jaws, palatine arch, hyoid arch, branchial arches, pectoral girdle, pelvic girdle,
axial skeleton, dorsal and anal fins, and the caudal skeleton. In addition, characters were drawn
from the soft anatomy of the oral jaws and pharyngeal apparatus, the viscera, reproductive system,
colour patterns and external morphology. Phylogenetic analyses of these character states were
undertaken using the principle of maximum parsimony. Computational procedures were performed
using the program PAUP. Two trees were produced with consistency indices of 0.697
(autapomorphies excluded). The topology and character state distributions of the ingroup are identical
in both trees. The analyses strongly supported the monophyly of the Scaridae. The family is defined
by 54 synapomorphies, of which 19 are unique and unreversed. Within the family ten groups are
recognised. All are referrable to previously recognised genera. Calotomus, Leptoscarus, Sparisoma,
Cetoscarus, Bolbometopon, Chlorurus, Hipposcarus and Scarus sensu stricto are hypothesised to
be monophyletic based on the possession of unique derived character states. No uniquely derived
character states were found to define Cryptotomus or Nicholsina. A cladogram showing the
phylogenetic relationships of these ten taxa is provided. This cladogram is used as a basis for
a new classification of the Scaridae. The following ten genera are recognised in this classification:
Cryptotomus, Nicholsina, Calotomus, Leptoscarus, Sparisoma, Cetoscarus, Bolbometopon, Chlorurus,
Hipposcarus and Scarus. The main difference in this classification from that in common usage
is in the limits of the genus Scarus. The genus Scarus sensu lata as previously applied was
paraphyletic and included species in two distinct lineages. These two lineages are recognised herein
as Chlorurus and Scarus sensu stricto with Hipposcarus being the immediate sister group of Scarus
sensu stricto. The analyses also indicate that the subfamily Sparisomatinae is paraphyletic. A
subfamilial division of the Scaridae is therefore rejected. A diagnosis of supraspecific taxa, with
a key to genera and a list of Recent species are provided. Biogeographical analyses based on the
cladogram point to a major division between Indo-Pacific and Atlantic/Caribbean scarid taxa and
2 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

identify the closure of the eastern Tethys and the formation of the Isthmus of Panama as key
vicariance events in the history of the Scaridae. Analyses of habitat associations suggest that scarids
first arose in seagrass and that reef dwelling forms are of a more recent origin. An analysis of
adult feeding modes suggests that scarids which excavate the substratum when feeding arose from
taxa which fed by browsing, and that taxa with a scraping mode arose relatively recently from
excavating forms as a result of paedomorphosis.

Contents

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Historical review of the supraspecific classification of the Scaridae .............................................. 4
Status of the family Scaridae ............................................................................................................... 6
The biology of the Scaridae ................................................................................................................. 7
Materials and methods ....................................................................................................................... '" 7
Comparative morphology of the Scaridae ........................................................................................... 8
Osteology .............................................................................................................................. ................... 9
Neurocranium .................................................................................................................................... 9
Oral jaws ......................................................................................................................................... 11
Premaxilla .............................................................................................................................. .... 11
Maxilla ....................................................................................................................................... 14
Dentary ....................................................................................................................................... 14
Articular ..................................................................................................................................... 17
Palatine arch.......................................................................................................................... ......... 17
Hyoid arch ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Branchial arches ............................................................................................................................. 21
Opercular series .............................................................................................................................. 26
Pectoral girdle ................................................................................................................................. 26
Pelvic girdle .................................................................................................................................... 27
Axial skeleton ................................................................................................................................. 28
Dorsal fin ........................................................................................................................................ 29
Anal fin ........................................................................................................................................... 29
Caudal skeleton ............................................................................................................................... 30
Lipid in bones ................................................................................................................................ 30
Soft anatomy ......................................................................................................................................... 31
Jaw muscles .................................................................................................................................... 31
Pharyngeal muscles ........................................................................................................................ 38
Ligaments ........................................................................................................................................ 39
Viscera ............................................................................................................................................. 39
Reproductive system ....................................................................................................................... 40
Juvenile colour patterns ....................................................................................................................... 40
External morphology ............................................................................................................................ 41
Phylogenetic analyses ........................................................................................................................... 41
Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 41
Selection of taxa and outgroups ............................................................................................. 41
Character selection and coding ............................................................................................... 42
Phylogenetic analyses ................................................................................................................ 43
Results .............................................................................................................................................. 43
Interpretation ................................................................................................................................... 43
Character analysis ..................................................................................................................... 43
Clade analysis ........................................................................................................................... 52
Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 54
Relationships of the Scaridae with other labroid taxa ............................................................. 54
Phylogeny and classification of the Scaridae ............................................................................. 54
Fossil record and historical biogeography ................................................................................... 56
Phylogenetic perspectives On ecology and life history .............................................................. 58
Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 60
Revised classification of genera of Scaridae .................................................................................... 60
A key to genera of Scaridae ........................................................................................................ 61
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 3

Systematic accounts ....................................................................................................................... 62

Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................. 68
References ............................................................................................................................................. 68
Appendix I - Species and numbers of specimens of Scaridae examined .................................. 73
Appendix 11 - Material held in Museum collections .. :................................................................. 75
Appendix III - Abbreviations used in text figures ........................................................................ 78
Appendix IV - Tables 1-3 ................................................................................................................ 81

BELLWOOD, D.R., 1994. A phylogenetic study of the parrotfishes family Scaridae (Pisces: Labroidei), with
a revision of genera. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 20: 1-86.

Introduction supraspecific classification of the family is now of

paramount importance.
The parrotfishes (family Scaridae) are a distinctive All recent workers who have addressed the
group of labroid fishes. Members of the family may problems of the supraspecific classification of the
be found on coral reefs throughout the world. They Scaridae (ie, Smith, 1956, 1959; Schultz, 1958, 1969;
are present in the tropical Atlantic, Indian and Rosenblatt & Hobson, 1969) have recognised the
Pacific Oceans, where they are closely associated with value of internal characters in the resolution of
coral reefs. In these areas, they form a dominant and scarid genera. Yet their studies, and all subsequent
conspicuous part of the herbivorous fish community. studies, have relied on generic groupings based almost
As such, they have been the focus of a number of entirely on external morphological characters or a single
studies on the importance and role of herbivores on coral internal character state (eg, Scarops Schultz, 1958).
reefs. They have been implicated as major determinants To date, there has been no detailed analysis of
of the benthic community structure of coral reefs (Brock, the interrelationships between scarid genera. Many
1979; Lewis & Wainwright, 1985) and as dominant generic descriptions lack adequate definitions or
agents of bioerosion on reefs, both currently (Kiene, sufficient diagnostic details to enable the boundaries of
1988; Bellwood & Choat, 1990) and historically (Steneck, groups to be clearly recognised. It is therefore, almost
1983a,b). Parrotfishes are a significant component of reef inevitable that scarid genera have been accepted or
fisheries yields and are a common food item in many rejected on a 'ad-hoc' basis.
tropical regions (Johannes, 1981; Reeson, 1983; An examination of the internal morphology of
Bellwood, 1988). representative species from all ten valid Recent genera
The Scaridae is relatively small family, with 80 and of representatives from several closely related
species in ten genera. It comprises small to large species families has provided a foundation upon which it is
with maximum adult sizes ranging from 110 to 1000 possible to undertake a major revision of the systematics
mm SL. Despite the small size and relative importance of the Scaridae.
of the family, the systematics of the Scaridae has been This will be undertaken as a phylogenetic analysis
in a state of confusion for many years. This is using a cladistic methodology (Hennig, 1966; Wiley,
primarily a result of the conservative nature of the 1981; Ax, 1987). It is the aim of this study to produce
external morphology of the group and has forced a phylogenetic hypothesis for the Scaridae, and a
most workers to rely on colour patterns as the primary classification which reflects this phylogeny. To
criterion for identifications. This approach is provide a strong basis for the analyses, this phylogenetic
confounded by the complex colour patterns exhibited study is based on the widest range of available
by most species, as a result of their sexual evidence, incorporating both internal and external
dichromatism and a propensity for dramatic colour anatomical features. A classification based on phylogeny
pattern changes both when live and as a result of is desirable as it permits morphological data to be
capture. These colour patterns are usually lost during examined in an evolutionary framework. A phylogeny is
preservation, thus limiting the utility of preserved also an essential prerequisite to the formulation and
specimens. testing of hypotheses of the biogeography and
There has been only one review of the family, by evolution of the group.
Schultz (1958). Schultz (1958) was aware of sexual The objectives of this study are to: 1) determine the
dichromatism in the family but not of its extent. In his phyletic status of the family Scaridae; 2) define the major
1958 revision therefore, sexual stages were often subgroups within the family; 3) determine the
regarded as separate species. interrelationships of the subgroups; 4) present a generic
The recent clarification of the status of many scarid classification of the Scaridae which reflects these
species is a result of the linking of the sex-related colour interrelationships.
patterns, ie, initial and terminal phase colour patterns Introductory aspects of scarid taxonomy and biology
(sensu Randall & Choat, 1980), and the identification will be considered under separate headings: i) historical
of early types. This has stabilised the taxonomy of the review; ii) status of the family Scaridae; iii) biology of
Scaridae at the species level. A clarification of the the Scaridae.
 4 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Historical Review of the Supraspecific Nieholsina. Nieholsina was accorded full generic status
Classification of the Scaridae by Schultz (1958).
From 1860 to 1940, the generic classification of the
Scaridae was relatively stable, albeit unclear. Most
Forssklll (1775) erected the genus Searus to
genera were relatively small, each containing a few
incorporate ten new species from the Red Sea. Of
distinctive species. Most 'typical' scarid species were
these, six were scarids; the remaining four have
placed in the 'catchall' genera Searus, Pseudosearus or
subsequently been placed in the families Labridae and
Callyodon.
Siganidae. From the original six parrotfish species
described by Forssklll, Jordan & Gilbert (1882) In the 1950s two major works on the taxonomy of
designated Searus psittaeus as the type species of the the Scaridae were published. The first was a review of
genus Searus. However, the actual identity of this the parrotfishes of the Western Indian Ocean by J.L.B.
species was not resolved until 1978 (Randall & Ormond, Smith (1956). The second was a comprehensive review
1978). Searus was established as the first genus of the of the family by L.P. Schultz (1958). The two workers,
family following the International Commission on Smith and Schultz, had disparate backgrounds and
Zoological Nomenclature decision (Opinion 261) to approached the problems of scarid taxonomy in markedly
invalidate names in Gronow's Zoophylacii different ways.
Gronoviani .... (1763), which included the parrotfish genus Although he examined the fish collections of several
Callyodon. The name was non-binomial, parrotfish museums, most of Smith's scarid work was based on
merely being referred to as "les callyodons". observations on fresh and preserved material collected
Gronow's Callyodon was subsequently followed by on the numerous trips he made along the east coast of
Callyodon Scopoli (1777), Callyodon Bloch (1788), and Africa, from South Africa to Kenya, and offshore to
Calliodon Bloch & Schneider (1801) all after Callyodon Aldabra, and the Seychelles. Smith's collections were
Gronow (1763). Walbaum (1792) contrasted the generic intensive but were restricted to the western Indian
characters of Searus and Callyodon as described by Ocean. He provided detailed descriptions and numerous
Gronow, Forsskal and Bloch. The earlier scarid genera colour plates, with the primary aim of identifying forms.
Mormyra Browne (1789) and Novaeula Catesby (1771) Species identifications and groupings were based on
were not included in this appraisal. morphology, colour patterns and a personal knowledge
Callyodon was widely used until 1959. Smith (1959) of their field biology.
was the last major work to use the name, and noted its Smith was primarily concerned with descriptions, and
replacement by Searus. Despite the invalidity of the name took pains to accurately describe the various colour
Callyodon it may still occasionally be found in more forms, providing both colour descriptions of fresh
recent literature (eg, Jones & Kumaran, 1980; Suvatti, material and colour plates. Correct nomenclature was of
1981). secondary importance. He regarded many of the early
In his extensive study of monocardian animals, types as unidentifiable, the descriptions being "utterly
Swainson (1839) recognised 16 genera in the subfamily inadequate". He preferred to describe a species as new
Scarinae (family Percidae), eight of which were new. Of rather than use an existing name based on a poor
the 16 genera, six contained only labrids and one was description.
erected to accommodate a siganid. Of the remaining nine In comparison, Schultz based most of his work on
genera, Swainson recognised the existing Callyodon and museum specimens, and was much more concerned than
Searus and erected seven new genera: Leptosearus, Smith with nomenclatural procedure. He regarded
Hemistoma, Petronason, Eryehthys, Chlorurus, Sparisoma, Smith's failure to put existing species names to his
(Swainson 1839:224-227), and Chloregaster (Swainson, specimens as "pandering to inadequacy and inefficiency".
1839:172). Their differences were not resolved.
Despite the number of existing scarid genera, Bleeker Although Smith (1956) and Schultz (1958) were aware
(1859b) recognised only two, Searus and Callyodon, but of sexual dimorphism in scarids, neither worker knew
erected three new genera, Seariehthys in 1859a (and the extent of sexual dimorphism and the protogynous life
1859b) and Pseudosearus and Callyodontiehthys in 186l. history of most scarids.
The three genera Callyodon, Searus and Pseudosearus In terms of their generic classifications, both workers
were subsequently accepted as the 'typical' scarid found the existing generic system unsatisfactory. Smith
genera and were widely used and frequently (1956) accepted some existing genera, but noted that
interchanged. most workers placed Indo-Pacific species into one
Post-1861 several unusual scarid specimens were polymorphous genus, either Callyodon or Searus. Smith
collected and new genera were erected to accommodate (1956) chose to adopt the former and, in addition,
them, namely, Cryptotomus Cope (1871), Calotomus erected several new genera: Xanothon, Bolbometopon,
Gilbert (1890), Searidea Jenkins (1903) and Xenosearus Margaritodon, Cetosearus and Hipposearus, stating that
Evermann & Radcliffe (1917). In addition, Jordan & "Our acquaintance with living Parrot fishes indicates
Evermann (1896) erected two new genera, Loro and that narrower generic limits for the Indo-Pacific forms
Eusearus, to accommodate two previously described are justified, [and] are indeed supported on both
Atlantic species. Fowler (1915) subsequently subdivided taxonomic and ecological grounds". Smith based his
Cryptotomus, placing several species in a new subgenus groupings on morphology, colour patterns and field
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 5

ecology. has stabilised. Following the discovery of sex reversal

In terms of higher classifications within the family, in scarids (Brock & Yamaguchi, 1954), field studies in
Schultz (1958) selected several genera stating that the 1960s and 1970s (Randall, 1963; Choat, 1969; Choat
"Since my studies indicate that certain characters are & Robertson, 1975) established the extent of sex
important in grouping parrotfishes into phyletic lines, it reversal in scarids and greatly assisted in the
seems advisable to recognise certain of these groups of subsequent linking of sexual colour phases.
species as full genera and others as subgenera". Nomenclatural stability also resulted from: 1) a detailed
Schultz's generic and sub-generic groupings were based re-examination of types, which established the identity
on morphological characters which are traditionally used of type specimens and linked the species in original
when examining preserved specimens in museum descriptions with currently recognised forms (Randall
collections. They are therefore based primarily on external & Ormond, 1978; Randall & Nelson, 1979); 2)
characters. Such characters form the basis of traditional geographically extensive collections which have
museum-based systematics, but are fraught with resolved differences between geographic variants and
problems when applied to the parrotfishes, where closely related but geographically isolated species eg,
meristic values and squamation patterns are very S. tricolor/forsteni; 3) detailed regional reviews
conservative. Schultz (1958) provided a presumed (eg, Rosenblatt & Hobson, 1969; Randall, 1983a,b;
phylogeny, but this was undertaken prior to the Randall & Bruce, 1983; Choat & Randall, 1986).
widespread application of Hennigian principles (after Despite the increased species stability, genera
Hennig, 1966). Schultz (1958) rejected all of Smith's new continued to be selected on an ad-hoc basis. Most
genera, stating that Smith "ignored many of the rules studies recognised the generic classification of
of zoological nomenclature" and that his newly erected Schultz (1969) with the exception of Scarops and the
genera are synonyms of already valid genera. Schultz addition of Smith's Cetoscarus and Hipposcarus (eg,
erected one new genus Scarops and two subgenera, Randall 1983b; Randall & Bruce, 1983; Choat &
Ypsiscarus and Xenoscarops. Schultz (1958) also divided Randall, 1986).
the family into two subfamilies, the Sparisomatinae and Since the major works of Smith and Schultz, only
the Scarinae. This division was based on a proposed two studies have specifically considered the status of
phylogeny which highlighted a division within the family scarid genera. In the same year as Schultz's final
in the distribution of a number of internal and external revision of the Scaridae, Rosenblatt & Hobson (1969)
characters. working on the Scarinae of the eastern Pacific,
These studies were followed by a re-evaluation by both considered the status of many scarin genera to be
workers. uncertain. They concluded that, "Until such time as the
In his re-evaluation of the parrotfishes of the western internal anatomy of a large number of parrotfish
Indian Ocean, Smith (1959) commended Schultz (1958) species is known, the most reasonable way to arrange
for attempting the task of reviewing the whole family the species of the Scarinae is to recognise only two
and providing illustrations for all species, and genera ....Bolbometopon and Scarus".
welcomed the use of internal morphological characters, In 1985, Bruce & Randall revised two scarid genera,
but he noted that Schultz had made "grievous errors", Calotomus and Leptoscarus. They diagnosed the two
primarily in the examination of types. Smith genera and placed Scaridea in the synonymy of
reaffirmed his confidence in his earlier (1956) genera Calotomus. Although detailed descriptions of each
but incorporated two of Schultz's subgenera, Ypsiscarus genus and the component species were given, these
and Scarops. were based almost entirely on external morphological
In Schultz's second (1969) revision of the Scaridae, characters. Bruce & Randall (1985) emphasised the
he accepted Smith's genus Bolbometopon but rejected need for a detailed study of other scarid groups before
Xanothon, Margaritodon, Cetoscarus and Hipposcarus. any comments on the relationship between these
Of his own genera, he raised Ypsiscarus to full generic two genera and other sparisomatine genera could be
status. made.
Both Smith and Schultz agreed that the main problem All of the recent workers have emphasised the need
in the recognition of scarid genera was the lack of for a reclassification of the Scaridae and all have
diagnostic external characters, and agreed that internal recognised the value of internal morphological
morphological characters were particularly useful for characters in such an undertaking. None of the studies
higher classification. Despite this, they both continued to date have assessed relationships in a phylogenetic
to erect and recognise genera based solely on a limited framework utilising cladistic methodologies. The use of
number of external morphological characters. The generic such methodologies can provide a clear indication of
classification of the Scaridae remained confused, with the the limits and interrelationships of scarid species
two principal workers, Smith and Schultz, recognising groups, and will give a rational basis for selecting scarid
six and four Indo-Pacific genera respectively, but of these genera.
they failed to agree on the extent of a single genus. Even This study represents the first detailed examination
if the same generic name was used, it was applied to of the family based on analyses of both internal and
different species or species groups. external morphological characters using cladistic
In the last two decades the taxonomy of scarid species methodologies.
6 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Status of the Family Scaridae dentition, lack of a true stomach and herbivorous
habit warrant familial status. Choat & Randall (1986)
likewise rejected a fusion of the three families.
The Scaridae was first recognised as a distinct In the present study, fusion of the Labridae, Scaridae
family by Bleeker (1859b) who later, in 1862, provided and Odacidae is also rejected. Monophyly is a
detailed descriptions of the two families: the Scaroldes prerequisite to the recognition of a family but does not,
(parrotfishes) and the Labroldes. Prior to .this alone, warrant such recognition. Despite the rejection of
classification, the two groups were both placed III a Kaufman & Liem's (1982) proposal it is recognised that
single family, the Labridae (eg, Cuvier & Valenciennes, the current status of the three families is unsatisfactory.
1840; Kner, 1860; Gunther, 1862). Bleeker's classification Combining them into a single family, however, is only
formed the basis for all subsequent classifications, with one possible solution. An alternative solution,
the Scaridae being widely accepted as a distinct recognising several families within the Labridae, must
family. Nevertheless, the close relationship between the also be considered. Although a familial revision is
Labridae and Scaridae was still recognised. In Norman's justified, any action at this time is regarded as premature.
(1966) classification, the Labridae, Scaridae and Such action must await a more detailed and critical study
Odacidae comprise a single division, the Labriformes. In of the interrelationships of the Labridae, Scaridae and
the classification of Greenwood et ai. (1966) the three Odacidae so that the two alternative classifications may
families form a single sub-order the Labroidei. be adequately appraised. In this study therefore, the
Recently, the status of the Labroidei has received conventional system will be followed, recognising the
considerable attention. The first major change was in Scaridae, Labridae and Odacidae as separate families.
1981, when Liem & Greenwood (1981) suggested that The status of the three families is discussed below.
the Cichlidae, Embiotocidae, Labridae, Scaridae and
Odacidae represent a monophyletic assemblage, with the
latter three families (the Labroidei sensu Greenwood et LABRIDAE
ai., 1966) forming a distinct (monophyletic) lineage. This
work was followed by that of Kaufman & Liem (1982), The status of the Labridae is less well defined than
who presented evidence to suggest that the Cichlidae, the Odacidae or Scaridae. The Labridae (sensu Norman,
Embiotocidae, Labridae, Scaridae, Odacidae and the 1966; Greenwood et ai., 1966) appears to be a paraphyletic
Pomacentridae are a monophyletic assemblage and assemblage. There are presently no recognised
proposed that all six families be included in the synapomorphies uniting the Labridae. The insertion of
Labroidei. This classification, unless stated otherwise, is the Adductor Mandibulae section Al via a tendon to the
followed in the present study (however, see Rosen & tip of the premaxillary process of the maxilla was
Patterson, 1990 for a discussion of the status of the regarded by Stiassny (1981) as a synapomorphy uniting
Labroidei). Within this 'expanded' Labroidei it was the Labridae. However, the status of this character was
argued that the Labridae, Scaridae and Odacidae should later questioned by Stiassny & Jensen (1987) who
be recognised as a single family, the Labridae, "since reported that this condition was approached by some
the monophyletic nature of this assemblage is strongly embiotocids and cichlids. In view of this similarity, and
indicated by both morphological and functional the presence of a comparable insertion mode in some
characters". Kaufman & Liem (1982) did not state the scarid genera (character 116, below), Stiassny & Jensen
reason for the proposed fusion beyond evidence of (1987) are followed and this character is rejected as a
monophyly. synapomorphy uniting the Labridae sensu stricto. The
It has been generally accepted that the Labroidei lack of a synapomorphy uniting the Labridae highlights
(sensu Kaufman & Liem, 1982) is monophyletic, although the need for a detailed revision of the Labroidei (sensu
the interrelationships between the families within this Greenwood et ai., 1966).
assemblage remain unclear (Stiassny & Jensen, 1987). Kaufman & Liem (1982) proposed a fusion of the
Likewise it is widely accepted that the Labridae, three families, whilst Gomon & Russell (1981, oral
Scaridae and Odacidae represent a monophyletic presentation) have proposed a classification of the genera
assemblage. The fusion of the Labridae, Scaridae and within such a family. However, in an oral presentation
Odacidae into a single family, however, is still a topic at the Third International Conference on the
of active discussion. Fusion was first suggested by Gomon Systematics and Evolution of Indo-Pacific Fishes, in
& Russell in an oral presentation at the inaugural Wellington, New Zealand, 1989, Bellwood presented
International Conference on the Systematics and evidence (given in Bellwood, 1990) to suggest that two
Evolution of Indo-Pacific Fishes held in Sydney, distinct lineages exist within the Labridae and that the
September 1981. Some workers followed Gomon & recognition of several labrid families may be warranted.
Russell and Kaufman & Liem (1982) and included the
Scaridae in the Labridae, eg, Stiassny & Jensen (1987).
Others questioned this decision. Richards & Leis OOACIDAE
(1984) cautioned against fusion of the three families,
based on observations on the early life history The Odacidae has been recently reviewed by Gomon
characters of several labroid families. Bruce & Randall & Paxton (1985). They presented evidence which
(1985) retained the Scaridae arguing that their unique suggested that the family is monophyletic. The Odacidae
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 7

was retained as a family to avoid confusion, but the the immediate vicinity of reefs (Bellwood & Choat,
authors supported the inclusion of the family Odacidae, 1990). Several reef-dwelling species have also been
along with the monotypic genus Chelio, as a tribe reported to eat the faeces of other reef species (Bailey
Odacini within the Labridae following Gomon & Russell & Robertson, 1982).
(1981, oral presentation; cited in Gomon & Paxton, There have been several reports of scarids feeding
1985). on live corals (eg, Hiatt & Strasburg, 1960; Glynn et
al., 1972; Frydl, 1979). However, it has been found that
live coral represents a major dietary constituent
SCARIDAE
(greater than 50%) in only one species, Bolbometopon
murieatum (Bruce, 1979; Bellwood, 1986; Bellwood &
Upon examination, many of the characters Choat, 1990).
traditionally considered diagnostic for the Scaridae (eg, The diet of those species that live in seagrass beds
fused jaw teeth, loss of the supraneurals (predorsal (Nicholsina, Calotomus, Leptoscarus and Sparisoma
bones), presence of an articulatory articular-dentary joint) species), is composed primarily of seagrasses (Randall
are absent from the more basal genera, whilst others (eg, & Bishop, 1967; Bruce & Randall, 1985). The diet of
the lower pharyngeal jaw form, and the form of the first Cryptotomus, another seagrass dwelling species, and the
haemal spine) appear to be present in some labrids (eg, sub-tropical rocky reef species Sparisoma eretense and
Pseudodax). Nevertheless, the monophyly of the S. strigatus have not been determined quantitatively.
Scaridae is strongly supported by a wide range of However, the former appears to feed primarily on
derived character states, many of which are unique and seagrasses and associated epiphytes, whilst the latter two
unreversed. In this study, the Scaridae is retained as a species include algae and a large amount of inorganic
family, however, it is acknowledged that a re-evaluation material in their diet (DRB unpublished data).
of the familial status of labroid taxa is necessary. During feeding, many reef-dwelling scarid species
remove large quantities of inorganic material. As a
result, scarids are a major bioeroding agent on coral
reefs. It has been estimated that up to 9 kg/m2/yr may
The Biology of the Scaridae be removed by scarid grazing on the Great Barrier Reef
(Kiene, 1988). The importance of scarids in primary
Ecology. Although several scarid species may be erosion, sediment reworking and habitat modification
found in subtropical waters, the vast majority of species have been the focus of a number of recent studies
are to be found in tropical regions in the immediate (Frydl & Stearn, 1978; Keine, 1988; Bellwood & Choat,
vicinity of coral reefs. Most species live in shallow 1990).
waters, with the greatest abundance being between 1 and
10 m (Bouchon-Navaro & Harmelin-Vivien, 1981; Russ, Colour phases and reproductive biology. Most scarids
1984). However, some species may be found down to are protogynous hermaphrodites and undergo a complex
180 m (Bruce & Randall, 1985). Five genera, Searus, series of colour pattern changes associated with their
Chlorurus, Hipposearus, Bolbometopon and Cetosearus, sexual ontogeny. There are typically three distinct
encompass 63 species, most of which occur solely on or colour phases: the juvenile phase, initial phase (IP) and
around coral reefs. In addition, two genera, Calotomus terminal phase (TP). IPs are sexually sub adult, female
and Sparisoma, have four reef-associated species. The or primary males (ie, males which are not the result of
remaining species in these two genera and the four sexual inversion). The colour pattern of IPs is typically
species in the remaining three genera (Cryptotomus, drab comprising dull browns and greys. TPs are sexually
Nieholsina and Leptosearus), are found on rocky reefs males. They may be either primary males which have
or in seagrass beds; Cryptotomus and Nieholsina in the simply undergone a colour change, or secondary males
Caribbean and Leptosearus in the Indo-Pacific. which have synchronously changed both their sex and
colour pattern. The colour patterns of TPs are usually
bright, with green and blue predominating. Juvenile
Food and feeding. All scarid species are diurnal colour patterns are extremely variable and often bear no
herbivores. The vast majority of reef-dwelling species resemblance to the adult IP or TP colour patterns
feed on the short epilithic (turf) algae that covers the (Bellwood & Choat, 1989). The reproductive biology of
reef substratum. However, there are at least two distinct parrotfishes is considered in detail in Choat &
functional groups within this assemblage: excavators and Robertson (1975), Robertson & Warner (1978) and
scrapers (Bellwood & Choat, 1990). Excavators have Robertson et al. (1982).
powerful oral jaws which excavate the substratum,
leaving distinct grazing scars. Scrapers have less powerful
jaws and rarely scar the substratum. Excavating species
include: all Chlorurus species, Bolbometopon, Cetosearus, Materials and Methods
and Sparisoma viride. The scrapers include all Searus
and Hipposearus species. Within the scraping species a The analyses in this study were based on the
distinct subgroup of Searus species may be recognised external examination of 65 scarid species, with
which occasionally feed on the surface of the sand in dissections and/or examinations of osteological
8 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

preparations of 63 species. This represents approximately immersion in buffered 20% formaldehyde (2-4 hrs),
81 % and 79%, respectively, of the 80 extant scarid before being washed, air dried and labelled for storage.
species recognised in this study (listed in the revised If necessary, the bones were subsequently degreased by
classification genera of Scaridae). These species included washing in toluene.
representatives of all genera and sub-genera of Fully articulated osteological preparations were
previous authors (Searidea excepted). The species prepared from fresh or frozen material. Specimens were
examined were classified into ten groups based on gutted, scaled and cleaned of as much flesh as possible,
shared character state distributions. All ten groups taking care not to disturb any bones. For ease of
corresponded with previously recognised genera. In all examination, the left mandibular, palatine and hyoid
cases the species examined included the type species arches were dissected free, along with the intact
from each of these genera. Care was taken to ensure branchial basket. All material was air dried for several
that, in cases where the type species has a wide days or weeks and placed in a dermestid beetle colony
geographical distribution, the material examined to remove the remaining flesh.
included specimens from the geographic region which To obtain clean disarticulated bones from dry
encompasses the type location of the type species (ie, articulated skeletons or from whole preserved
Red Sea specimens of Chlorurus gibbus, Hipposearus specimens, bones were carefully removed, placed in
ha rid and Searus psittaeus). The material examined is distilled water for 24 to 48 hours, cleaned of excess
listed in Appendix I, with details of material held III flesh, and placed in a narrow deep flask of hot water
museum collections given in Appendix 11. to which sodium perborate had been added
Throughout the text generic terms are employed in (approximately 30g/l). The bones were left in this
their revised sense. The body of this study is based on solution for 48 hours then the softened flesh washed or
a survey of the comparative morphology of the Scaridae brushed off. The perborate treatment was repeated if
with a phylogenetic analysis of the morphological necessary.
characters and their character states. The results of these Enzyme cleared counterstained specimens were
analyses are presented as a cladogram. This cladogram prepared using the alcian blue-alizarin red S method of
describes interrelationships between species groups Dingerkus & Uhler (1977). Some specimens were
within the family and indicates that changes to the subsequently dissected to clearly expose internal
current generic classification of the Scaridae are structures. A few specimens were dissected prior to
necessary. To clarify these changes, generic diagnoses, clearing.
synonymies, a key, and an annotated list of valid extant Osteological details of type material and additional
species are given in the revised classification of genera specimens were based on analyses of radiographs
of Scaridae. stored in the Ichthyology Department of the National
The terminology of the following studies was used in Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.
the descriptions: (i) external morphology - Choat & Anatomical illustrations were prepared primarily from
Randall (1986), (ii) osteology - Gomon & Paxton (1985), drawings made using a camera-lucida mounted on a
Russell (1988), with details following Rognes (1973) and dissecting microscope. Large structures or whole head
Barel et at. (1976), (iii) myology - Winterbottom (1974), dissections of large specimens were drawn using a
unless stated otherwise, (iv) intestinal morphology - Grant projector, or were based on photographs of the
Bellwood (1986). specimen. In paired bones, those of the left side are
figured. Abbreviations used in the text figures are listed
in Appendix Ill.
Preparation of material. Most of the osteological
material examined was obtained by hot water maceration
of fresh or frozen specimens followed by bacterial
Comparative Morphology of the Scaridae
digestion. Fresh or fully thawed frozen specimens were
placed in hot water at 80 to 100°C for three to ten
minutes until the flesh was loose. The specimen was Previous descriptions. There have been few
removed, allowed to cool and excess flesh carefully comprehensive studies of the internal morphology of
washed off or removed using forceps. The bones were parrotfishes. Most studies have been restricted to
then placed in fresh water for four to ten days (at descriptions of specific structures, particularly the
approximately 25°C) to allow any remaining flesh to be pharyngeal apparatus (Monod, 1951; Nelson, 1967;
softened by bacterial digestion. The water was changed Yamaoka, 1980; Liem & Greenwood, 1981; Kaufman &
everyone to two days and any loose flesh washed off. Liem, 1982; Gobalet, 1989) and oral jaws (eg, Choat,
The water was buffered with calcium carbonate to 1969; Bruce, 1979; Bellwood & Choat, 1990).
prevent excessive acid buildup. Care was taken to ensure To date, there has been no published comparative
that the bony elements of the suspensorium, study which addresses differences between all scarid
neurocranium and vertebral column did not genera, with the possible exception of Schultz (1958) who
disassociate. In whole preparations, all disarticulated figured the pharyngeal bones of several genera and
bones, including ribs and fin elements, were retained. alluded to their utility in supra-specific classifications.
Once all the flesh was removed, the bones were General surveys of the oral jaws (Choat, 1969) and of
sterilised and connective tissues fixed by brief the pharyngeal apparatus (Bruce, 1979) formed the
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 9

basis for ecological comparisons but were not examined can co-occur (as in labrids), the two features are
in a cladistic framework. Detailed studies which consider regarded as separate characters. The only genus which
more than one functional system are invariably restricted differs from this basic pattern is Bolbometopon, which
to one or a few species, usually from the genus Searus unlike all other taxa has an enlarged reticulate ethmoid
(eg, Gobalet, 1980; Tedman, 1980a,b; Clements & (4.1). This forms the base for the unusually large hump
Bellwood, 1988). in this species although, as in other species, the hump
The studies outlined above include most of the per se is composed of fibrous tissue.
major works on scarid morphology. Additional Dorsally, two unusual features of the scarid
descriptions of the morphology of specific structures neurocranium are apparent. Firstly, the form of the
will be noted in the relevant sections below. In the supraoccipital crest. In most scarids, the sl1praoccipital
following section, derived character states are indicated crest has distinct lateral flanges (6.1). These flanges
in the text by boldface numbers in parentheses giving are absent in the outgroups. In Calotomus they are
the character and character state (eg, 2.1 = character 2 particularly well developed and result in an extended
state 1 is derived). Where there is more than one derived trifid supraoccipital crest posteriorly (6.2). Secondly,
state these are indicated in a similar manner (eg, 8.1- the posterior extension of the epioccipital. This extension
2 or 8.3). Numbering character states 1, 2, 3 etc. does is absent in the outgroups but present in all scarids
not necessarily indicate a transformation series. The (8.1-3), where the epioccipital is extended posteriorly to
polarity of the characters states was determined during form a curved flange. Dorsally, the flange is confluent
the construction of the cladogram. with the top of the neurocranium. Medially, it curves
ventrally fusing with an exoccipital flange which tapers
off as it extends towards the exoccipital condyle. In
Osteology Cryptotomus and Nieholsina the epioccipital flange is
relatively short (8.1; not reaching the exoccipital condyle).
Neurocranium (characters 1 - 12) In all other genera, with the exception of Calotomus,
the epioccipital flange is well developed and extends
Fig. 1 posteriorly to or beyond the level of the exoccipital
condyle (8.2). In Calotomus the flange extends
The form of the neurocranium varies widely within anteromedially and fuses with the laterally expanded
flanges of the trifid supraoccipital crest (8.3). A slight
the family, from robust massive structures in
anteromedial twisting of the flange may be seen in
Bolbometopon to light, fragile structures in some Searus
species. The neurocranium of many scarids is well Sparisoma. In all genera, the epioccipital flange
ossified with strong suturing of the bony elements, represents the site of origin of posterior portion of the
particularly in large specimens. The basic form of the levator posterior. This site of origin is bordered
neurocranium of scarids has been described briefly by posteromedially by the exoccipital flange. The exoccipital
Tedman (1984a), Yamaoka (1980), Gobalet (1989) and flange is long (ie, extending beyond exoccipital condyle)
Clements & Bellwood (1989). in all scarid genera except Hipposearus and Searus,
where it terminates well short of the exoccipital condyle
As in the outgroups, the ethmoid-vomerine region is
(7.1). This flange is not present in any of the outgroups.
usually relatively short. Although quite variable both
within and between genera, elongation of this region is It is in the ventral aspect that the most striking
apparent in several genera and is considered derived features of the neurocranium of scarids may be seen:
(1.1; region forward of lateral ethmoid greater than 40% A) the presence of deep subtemporal fossae and B) the
of total neurocranuim length). Two pairs of facets are articulatory facets of the pharyngeal articulation.
visible on the vomer, a pair of maxillary facets on the A pair of large, deep subtemporal fossae are present
anterior lateral surface and a pair of anteriorly facing in all scarid genera (9.1-2), with an additional smaller
premaxillary facets near the ethmoid-vomer suture. The pair posteriorly in some genera (9.1). These fossae are
orientation of the lateral maxillary facets appears to be unique to the Scaridae. In some labrids the neurocranium
of phylogenetic significance. In the outgroups the may have depressions in this region (eg, in
orientation has an anterior component (face of facet Semieossyphus and some Bodianus species), but only in
clearly visible when viewed anteriorly), with the loss of scarids are deep shaft-like fossae present. The anterior
this component in scarids apparently being derived fossae are subtriangular when viewed ventrally and are
(5.1). The characteristic depression formed by the bordered by the pro otic, pterotic, exoccipital and
ethmoid and frontals in labrids, which forms a fossa for intercalar, with the supraoccipital, parietal and epioccipital
the ascending processes of the premaxillae (Russell, forming the roof. The posterior pair of fossae, when
1988), is represented in scarids by a depression in the present, are invariably smaller and are usually a more
ethmoid. The loss of this depression in some scarids is elongate triangular shape with a posteriorly directed
considered derived (2.1). In the outgroups and some apex. The anterior fossae are parallel sided or slightly
scarid genera, the ethmoid and frontals are sutured. wider dorsally. The posterior pair taper dorsally and
However, in those scarids which have an ethmoid-frontal appear to be bordered by the epioccipital, intercalar,
depression, the two bones are separate (3.1). Because parietal and pterotic. The posterior margins of the
fusion of the bones and the presence of a depression posterior fossae are reduced in Bolbometopon and are
10 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

present only as a vestige in Chlorurus, Hipposearus and of the medial fibres of the large fourth levator externus
Searus (9.2) where they are marked by a protrusion of muscle. Posterior fossae are the site of origin of the
the intercalar. posterior fibres of the fourth levator externus, although
The anterior subtemporal fossae are the site of origin some of the anterior fibres of the levator posterior may
a

b
"'"" ...... :./.

d
~ .... ------
......

Fig. 1. The neurocranium of Cryptotomus roseus: A, dorsal view, B, lateral view, C, ventral view, scale
bar equals 5 mm; a-k, pharyngeal articulation facets, anterior to left, scale bars equal 5 mm, a-j, ventral
view: a - Cryptotomus roseus; b - Nieholsina usta; c - Calotomus earolinus; d - Leptosearus vaigiensis;
e - Sparisoma viride; f - Cetosearus bieolor; g - Bolbometopon murieatum; h - Chlorurus gibbus; i -
Hipposearus longieeps; j - Searus psittaeus; k - Searus psittaeus, posterior view (ventral surfaces uppermost).
Abbreviations given in Appendix Ill).
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 11

encroach upon the fossa. The presence of these fossae surface, a shelf or groove marks the location of the
represents a major change in the structure of the insertion of the posterior maxillary-premaxillary ligament.
neurocranium and probably also in the mechanics of In Pseudodax and all scarids, the ventrally facing
the pharyngeal apparatus. Bellwood (1986) suggested maxillary facet is located immediately lateral to this shelf
that this change may be correlated with an increase in or groove, at the base of the alveolar and ascending
the role of the anterior pharyngeal muscles, increasing processes (29.1). This facet represents the dorsal
mobility for grinding rather than simple crushing power. surface of the main maxillary-premaxillary joint and
In most labroids and in all the outgroups examined, corresponds with the premaxillary condyle of the
the facets of the neurocranial-pharyngeal articulation are maxilla. In all remaining outgroups, the maxillary facet
short and convex. In scarids, however, these facets are is located part way along the ascending process.
represented by a pair of large, elongate (length greater A maxillary fossa was not recorded in any outgroup,
than 2.5 times width) anteroposteriorly oriented grooves but was present in all scarid genera with the exception
on the posterior part of the parasphenoid (10.1). These of Searus. This fossa is indistinct in Cryptotomus and
elongate, concave (12.1) articulation facets differ Nieholsina (15.1) and distinct in the remaining scarid
markedly from those of all other members of the genera (15.2). The maxillary fossa may be located at the
Labroidei and represent a unique derived feature of the angle of the ascending process and the alveolar process,
Scaridae. These facets point to a change in the function either at the base of the ascending process facing
of the upper pharyngeal jaws, from a rotational laterally, or at the base of the alveolar process facing
movement (as in labrids) to a sliding movement, or a posteriorly, or intermediate between these two. This
rotation around a much larger circumference. Within the fossa may be represented by a flat facet, a deep concave
Scaridae the form of the facets vary considerably in facet or a raised crater-shaped concave facet. It is into
shape, having either straight edges and a bluntly this fossa that the protrusion on the anterior face of the
rounded anterior margin or tapering to a point anteriorly maxillary head inserts. In Sparisoma, there is a unique
as in Chlorurus, Hipposearus and Searus (11.1; Fig. 1). flat facet immediately above the maxillary fossa (31.1).
This is an anterior extension of the palatine-maxillary
articulation.
Oral jaws In scarids, the alveolar process is bifid distally (24.1).
In labrids the alveolar process is usually rounded or
The oral jaws (mandibular arch) of parrotfishes have pointed distally (some odacids may have a slight
been described on numerous occasions and have been indentation distally). In most scarid genera, there is a
recognised as one of the few external characters to be small concave/flat facet between the two processes (30.1).
of taxonomic value at supraspecific levels. Descriptions This facet is absent in Hipposearus and Searus, whilst
of the tooth plates are almost invariably included in in Leptosearus the facet is convex (30.2).
species descriptions (eg, Randall, 1983a; Randall & The dental plates display a wide variety of tooth
Bruce, 1983; Bruce & Randall, 1985; Choat & Randall, forms and configurations. There are three basic individual
1986). Descriptions of the osteology of the oral jaws are tooth forms: caniniform, conical and incisiform. There
provided in Gregory (1933), Tedman (1984a), Clements are two basic tooth forms when fused: a) small flattened
& Bellwood (1988), and Bellwood & Choat (1990). incisiform/conical or b) large incisiform. In addition,
there are three main toothed regions: ilnterior, lateral and
posterior.
Premaxilla (characters 13 - 31)
Teeth in the anterior region are relatively large. They
Fig. 2 may be caniniform (Cryptotomus, Nieholsina), pointed
but flattened (Calotomus, some Sparisoma) or thickened
There is a great deal of variability in the structure with a blunt cutting margin (all genera with coalesced
of the premaxilla between scarid genera. The basic shape, teeth except Leptosearus). These teeth all develop in a
with a relatively thick, blunt ascending process and a dorsal alveolar region and migrate anteroventrally before
shorter alveolar process at 45 to 90° to it, is relatively erupting on or near the cutting edge. It is these teeth
uniform. Most variability is found in the form of the which typically fuse to form the characteristic fused
dental plates, the teeth and the articulation facets. dental plates. The presence of coalesced teeth was only
The paired premaxillae are joined medially by recorded in Odax and some scarid genera (13.1). In the
cruciate ligaments which connect the anterodorsal remaining outgroups and scarid genera, teeth were
regions of the ascending processes. The ascending either isolated or in rows with no evidence of
process may be pointed terminally, but is usually blunt. coalescence. The plates are usually covered with a layer
Some genera have a depreSSion on the posteroventral of cement (19.3), although the occurrence of cement is
surface of the ascending process (23.1) (the region highly variable between taxa. This cement appears to be
occupied by the rostral cartilage), whilst on the lateral similar to the osteodentine described in tetraodontids
surface, there may be an elongate indentation (22.1), by Andreuci et al. (1982). The cement is usually white
corresponding with the location of the palatine dorsal but in TP Chlorurus and Searus it is often blue or blue-
process. Neither of these depressions/indentations were green.
recorded in the outgroups examined. On the ventral The presence of anterior caniniform teeth in most
12 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

. :7

Fig. 2. Premaxillae: A-J, lateral view; a-j, ventral view; anterior to left; scale bars equal 5 mm; A-a -
Cryptotomus roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus; D-d - Leptosearus vaigiensis;
E-e - Sparisoma viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus gibbus;
I-i - Hipposearus longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 13

outgroups suggests that the loss in several scarid taxa of large developing teeth (28.1), which are absent or
is a derived feature (16.1). The condition in Pseudodax small in all outgroups and some scarid genera. The
is unusual with highly modified flattened incisiform presence of oblique tooth rows is a distinct feature of
teeth anteriorly. Within Calotomus and Sparisoma the all scarid species, including Leptosearus. In Leptosearus,
presence of caniniform teeth varies both within and the dental plates are shallow with strongly oblique
between species. tooth rows. In the other genera, the dental plates are
On the lateral face of the premaxillae, immediately deep and the tooth rows are more acute, although a
posterior to the anterior teeth, are the lateral canines. Leptosearus-like condition is found in Sparisoma
These arise at the posterior or posteroventral extremity radians.
of the main alveolar region, and migrate anteroventrally Only one character of the oral jaw apparatus as a
before erupting. Although the lateral canines may be whole was used in the phylogenetic analyses, namely,
short and blunt, they are usually long and pointed and the nature of the jaw overlap. Previously, this feature
curve posteriorly. Lateral canines may be present in was one of the key characters used to divide the two
the initial phase, but their presence is often associated subfamilies within the Scaridae: Sparisomatinae (upper
with sexual maturity or the sexual transition to the jaw included within lower jaw when mouth closed) and
male, terminal phase. Although present in Haliehoeres, Scarinae (edge of lower jaw included in that of upper
lateral canines are absent in most labrid taxa and their jaw when mouth closed) sensu Schultz (1958). The
presence is considered to be derived (17.1). It appears functional implications of this difference are not
that they may have arisen as a result of a lateral known. In most outgroups the jaws oppose with
rotation of the large caniniform teeth found in many interdigitating teeth. In scarids, the extent to which the
labrid genera (eg, Pseudolabrus and Bodianus). dentary protrudes (21.1) may vary (being indistinct in
In species without fused dental plates, a bony ridge Cryptotomus, Nieholsina and Calotomus), but is clearly
runs inside the anterior teeth and extends along the distinguished from the overshot condition with a
alveolar process. Along the posterior portion of this protruding premaxilla (21.2) in Cetosearus, Bolbometopon,
ridge are the posterior teeth. These teeth are usually small Chlorurus, Hipposearus and Searus.
and conical. Some or all of the teeth may be found in Although the development of coalesced teeth in
a row along the ridge. In Nieholsina, there is an scarids and other labroids awaits a more detailed
additional row anteriorly, in Calotomus the teeth extend investigation, it appears that there may be two separate
medially, and in Leptosearus they appear to be fused in types of fusion. The first, posterior type, being a
rows which extend forward along the bony ridge. flattening and fusion by cement connection of the s
Posterior teeth develop at the posterior extremity of the mall conical teeth at the angle of the jaws, with several
toothed area and migrate anteriorly or anterolaterally adjacent oblique rows forming the cutting edge. In this
before erupting on the cutting edge. In Nieholsina and scheme, new teeth erupt at the posterior end of each
Calotomus there is some degree of cement deposition at row, from here, they migrate anteriorly to take a place
the base of the teeth in the lateral row. In Leptosearus, on the cutting edge, replacing worn teeth. This pattern
the teeth are short and even, and are fused in tight rows of fusion is typified by Leptosearus. A similar pattern
which progress anterolaterally along the cutting edge. may be found in Sparisoma radians, whilst several
Small conical teeth are occasionally visible in species Calotomus species show some degree of flattening and
in genera with fused dental plates. In these species, fusion by cement of the small conical teeth at the angle
these teeth are present at the posterior extremity of the of the jaws.
cutting edge (eg, Hipposearus, Fig. 1I,i). The second, anterior type of fusion is characterised
The form of the dental plates varies greatly within by a mosaic formed by rows of large teeth on the front
and between genera. In the analyses, several characters of the dental plates. In this pattern, new teeth
which relate to the form of the dental plates were used: develop in the alveolar region of the dental plate, they
1) the form of the cutting edge, which may be a single progress towards the cutting edge, where they erupt
entire edge, extending from the symphysis to the angle through the anterior/lateral face of the dental plates.
of the jaws (14.1), or incompleteibroken as in all From here, they migrate to the cutting edge where they
outgroups except Odax; 2) the number of tooth rows, wear and are lost, to be replaced by the teeth
in which genera with three to six rows (some scarids; immediately above them. It appears that the teeth in this
all outgroups except Odax) are clearly distinguished from scheme are modified anterior caniniform teeth.
the remaining genera which have approximately 12 to Within the Scaridae there appears to be a range of
22 (20.1); 3) the presence of conical teeth medial to the intermediate stages in the development of the anterior
cutting edge (25.1); 4) the presence of a conical tooth type of fusion. The proposed sequence, and that
or teeth on the medial face adjacent to the medial supported by the cladogram, is: 1) the plesiomorphic
symphysis, found only in Calotomus (26.1); 5) the condition with caniniform teeth on the anterior face of
origin of the teeth in the lateral tooth rows, which is premaxilla as in Cryptotomus; 2) a flattening of these
indeterminate in most outgroups, but lateral in teeth as in Calotomus; 3) an increase in the depth of
Pseudodax and all scarid genera except Leptosearus the dental plates, with more rows of teeth and a greater
where the teeth erupt on the medial surface of the jaw number of exposed teeth per row as in Sparisoma
(27.1); 6) the presence of clearly visible diagonal rows rubripinne and S. ehrysopterum; 4) individual teeth
 14 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

increase in strength and expand posteriorly, producing greatly, and in some genera, is greatly expanded
solid dental plates as in large Sparisoma viride; 5) posterodorsally. Distally, the maxillary arm may be
individual teeth enlarge further as in Cetosearus and straight or curved anteriorly. In most genera, a small
Bolbometopon, whilst the whole dental plate may be facet may be located on the anterior face of the maxillary
covered in cement as in Chlorurus; 6) individual teeth arm, corresponding to the facet between the bifid
decrease in size but retain the cement and growth pattern processes of the premaxillary alveolar process. On the
(Hipposearus or Searus). mid-anterior margin of Sparisoma there is an unusual
Whilst the two patterns are not mutually exclusive grooved process (32.1), where the maxillary arm abuts
(Calotomus has traces of both patterns and S. radians the premaxillary alveolar process. This process is absent
appears to have an intermediate form or a fusion of in the outgroups and all other scarid genera. It may
both anterior and posterior types), the presence of represent an extraordinary enlargement of the facet
small conical teeth in some Searus, Hipposearus and found in this position in other scarid genera.
Chlorurus species suggests that the dental plates in The maxillary head varies considerably in its relative
these genera are a result of anterior fusion rather than size. The medial face is often enlarged with a posteriorly
an anterior progression of a posterior fusion. expanded bony flange. The maxillary facet of the
The hypothesis that the form of the dental plates palatine-maxillary articulation lies in the middle of the
of Chlorurus and Searus species is a result of fusion maxillary head facing posterodorsally. This facet is
of the anterior teeth is supported by observations of lacking in labrids. In scarids it may be concave, convex,
the ontogeny of the oral jaws in these two genera or concave with a posteroventral groove (33.1-3). The
(Bellwood, 1986). In both genera, recently settled medial face of the maxillary head bears the neurocranial
specimens 7 to 9 mm SL (ie, within days of leaving the condyle posteriorly and extends anteriorly to form the
plankton) have caniniform teeth on the anterior edge of premaxillary process. The premaxillary condyle is located
the jaws. Developing teeth on the anterior face of on the anterodorsal extremity of the premaxillary
the dental plates are also caniniform. At 10 to 12 mm process. This condyle may extend on to the lateral and/
SL, the caniniform anterior teeth are lost, although or medial faces. In Leptosearus the condyle is only
small conical teeth are present at the angle of the jaws. present on the lateral face as the flange on the maxillary
The new anterior teeth are scale-shaped with a head extends along the premaxillary process. On the
flattened overall appearance and a broadly curved medial face, immediately below this condyle is a small
leading edge. During the early juvenile phase, 14 to 50 groove (in some scarids and all outgroups), cavity (35.2)
mm SL, the anterior teeth become progressively or deep fossa (35.1), marking the insertion site of the
stronger, and become more pear-shaped, with the anterior maxillary-premaxillary ligament.
broad margin on the cutting edge, the number of In labrids and some scarids, the Alt inserts anteriorly
tooth rows and number of teeth per row slowly on the ventral face of the premaxillary process. In
increases. The small conical teeth at the angle of the Cryptotomus, Calotomus and Sparisoma, this origin is
jaws are usually lost between 19 to 27 mm SL. Above from a small rod in this position (no rod in Nieholsina
25 mm SL, the developing teeth are clearly visible and Leptosearus). The insertion of the Alt in Chlorurus,
within the dental plates, and the overall appearance is Hipposearus and Searus is at base of the maxillary head.
similar to that of some Sparisoma species. In In Cetosearus and Bolbometopon a stout ridge extends
progressively larger specimens, individual teeth become from the ventral surface of the premaxillary process to
thicker, the material covering the plates become the medial surface of the maxillary arm, terminating in
increasingly opaque and the plates are eventually covered the Alt insertion scar. The presence of this ridge is
in cement. considered derived (36.1).
A premaxillary facet is present on the anterior face
of the maxillary head in all scarid genera except Searus
Maxilla (characters 32 - 36) This facet inserts into the maxillary fossa on the
Fig. 3 premaxilla. The premaxillary facet may be on the medial
(34.1) or anterior (34.2) face of the maxillary head. This
structure has been recorded only in scarids.
In scarids, the maxilla is more robust than in labrids. In Hipposearus, a large palatine facet is present
This difference probably reflects the greater force posteriorly on the lateral face of the medial flange of
applied to the jaws during feeding in scarids. The three the maxillary head. This facet corresponds with a
main regions of the maxilla are A) the maxillary arm, large flat facet on the medial face of the palatine (ef
a large flattened lateral limb; B) the maxillary head, at character 53).
the dorsal end of the maxillary arm and surrounding the
facet of the palatine-maxillary articulation (the principal
articulation point of the upper jaw); and C) the Dentary (characters 37 - 44)
premaxillary process, which lies medial to the maxillary
head. Fig. 4
The maxillary arm is usually broad and laterally
flattened with a bony flange or process on the The form of the dentary varies widely between scarid
posterodorsal margin. The size of this process varies genera, from the labrid-like condition found in
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 15

A a mx head c c
pmx con
in ant mx pmx fig

pal art fac

G 9

Fig. 3. Maxillae: A-J, lateral view, anterior to left; a-j, medial view, anterior to right; scale bars equal 5
mm; A-a - Cryptotomus roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus; D-d - Leptosearus
vaigiensis; E-e - Sparisoma viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus
gibbus; I-i - Hipposearus longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
16 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

art f05

cor pr B
a

Fig. 4. Dentaries: A-J, lateral view, anterior to left; a-j, medial view, anterior to right; scale bars equal 5
mm; A-a - Cryptotomus roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus; D-d - Leptosearus
vaigiensis; E-e - Sparisoma viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus
gibbus; I-i - Hipposearus longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 17

Cryptotomus which is characterised by discrete rows in Nieholsina and most Searus species. Lateral canine
of caniniform teeth, to highly modified forms as in teeth on the dentary appear to be an unusual
Chlorurus which has deep dental plates, a greatly development restricted to a few Searus species. The
expanded coronoid process and a deep articular fossa. extent of coalescence and cement deposition on the teeth
In terms of the overall shape of the dentary, the or dental plates follows that found on the premaxilla.
greatest departures from the labrid-like form of In all scarid genera, the tooth rows on the dentary
Cryptotomus are: 1) the expansion of the coronoid are characterised by new teeth erupting on the lateral
process (deep rounded form Fig. 4; 43.1), from the surface of the jaw at the posterior end of each tooth row.
narrow pointed form found in all outgroups and some Erupted teeth progress anterodorsally towards the cutting
scarids. In Sparisoma this process has a distinctive edge, where they become functionally active and replace
notch posteriorly (44.1). This notch is a unique derived worn teeth.
feature of the genus; 2) the form of the articular fossa. In Cryptotomus and Nieholsina there are three and
This may be represented by either a broad flat tapering three to five tooth rows, respectively, the anterior two
groove, where the anterior ascending process of the rows consist of flattened caniniform teeth. Teeth in the
articular is bound to the dentary (as in most scarids and lateral row( s) are incisiform (occasionally pointed). In
all outgroups), or a deep rounded fossa (42.1), which some Cryptotomus there are also few small conical teeth
represents the articulation socket of the articulatory in a short row posteriorly. In all genera except
articular-dentary joint (as in Chlorurus, Hipposearus and Cryptotomus, Nieholsina and Calotomus, the number of
Searus). Some foreshortening of the groove is apparent diagonal tooth rows is greater than five (usually 6-10;
in Bolbometopon but this does not represent an 37.1). In the outgroups there is usually only one row
articulatory fossa. of teeth, tooth rows as in scarids are not present.
On the medial face, differences are marked by: 1) the Pseudodax is unusual, with a row of numerous small
presence of a large insertion scar marking the teeth. In this genus, the developing teeth alternate in
insertion of the A3t on the posterodorsal region of their position and may be interpreted as rows, although
the medial face of the dentary coronoid process these 'rows' of two to three teeth are not as clear as
(corresponding with 120.2); 2) an anterior extension of those of scarids, and are not considered homologous. In
the coronoid process as a bone ridge passing medial to the Scaridae, the angle of the tooth rows with respect
the main cutting edge (38.1), which is absent in some to the cutting edge may be either oblique (less than 45°
outgroups and most scarid genera; 3) modified medial eg, Cryptotomus), approximately 45° forming a mosaic
sutures. (39.1, eg, Cetosearus), or perpendicular (39.2, eg, Searus).
In all scarids, the paired dentaries are sutured along
the medial symphysis. Comparable medial sutures are Articular (characters 45 - 47)
present in several labrid taxa and appear to be
correlated with a strengthening of the jaw during Fig. 5
occlusion (Gomon, 1979). A similar correlation has been
suggested for the presence of sutures in some cichlids In most scarid genera, the articular closely resembles
(Stiassny, personal communication). In labrids and that of labrids, with well-developed anterior and
cichlids, the sutures are represented by a series of straight posterior ascending processes and a broad descending
diagonal ridges, as in Searus (and juveniles of other process, incorporating the angular on the posteroventral
scarid genera), and are usually small and few in number. corner. In scarids, the anterior ascending process may
In scarids, the sutures usually have an irregular or zig- taper to a point as in labrids, be short and broad with
zag form (40.2), with their margins becoming a terminal notch (45.1), or moderately broad and
increasingly uneven in large individuals. There are two rounded distally (45.2). In most labrids and scarids,
notable exceptions, in Chlorurus the sutures are straight the articular descending process has a medial bony
with a small inflected or zig-zag portion posteriorly flange which may extend onto the anterior ascending
(40.3) whilst in Searus the sutures are straight (the process. In some scarid genera, however, this flange is
plesiomorphic condition). Within a species the number reduced with only the vertical portion remaining as an
of sutures increases with increasing size (Bruce, 1979). articular medial spine (47.1). In some genera, the
In scarids, and if present in labrids, the medial sutures articular is highly modified, with the loss of the
usually extend to the anterior edge of the dentary, posterior ascending process (46.1). Within the family,
excluding the cement. In Cetosearus and Bolbometopon, there is a progressive reduction in the size of Meckel's
however, the sutures do not reach the anterior margin fossa, from a large labrid-like fossa in Cryptotomus to
(41.1). its absence in Searus. Meckel's cartilage is lost in
In general, the form of the teeth and dental plates Chlorurus and Searus.
mirror those of the premaxilla, however, there is less
differentiation of teeth into anterior, lateral and Palatine arch (characters 48 - 56)
posterior fields. The teeth on the dentary appear to be
dominated by teeth from the anterior tooth field. Fig. 6
Posterior teeth are usually greatly reduced, as in
Cryptotomus, Sparisoma and Hipposearus, or absent as The palatine arch has not been used previously as a
18 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

A a

H h

J
art med sp

Fig. 5. Articulars: A-J, lateral view, anterior to left; a-j, medial view, anterior to right; scale bars equal
5 mm; A-a - Cryptotomus roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus; D-d - Leptosearus
vaigiensis; E-e - Sparisoma viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus
gibbus; I-i - Hipposearus longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 19

source of characters in systematic studies of the a distinct maxillary condyle terminally (51.1). Basally,
Scaridae. The overall form differs little from that of the the palatine is strongly ankylosed to the entopterygoid
Labridae and other labroids, with the exception of the and ectopterygoid (56.1), in contrast to the loose association
form of the palatine and the palatine-maxillary found in labrids. These features appear to reflect an
articulation. In the Labridae, the palatine dorsal process increase in the overall strength of the palatine-maxillary
is a thin bone with an elongate palatine dorsal articulation.
process. Anteriorly, it articulates with the maxilla via Within the Scaridae the form of the palatine varies
ligaments that attach the two bones (Gomon, 1979; considerably. In Cetoscarus, Bolbometopon and
Russell, 1988). There is no terminal condyle. In scarids, Chlorurus, unlike other scarids and the outgroups, the
the palatine dorsal process is relatively robust and bears palatine dorsal process is short and robust (50.1; Fig.

F G
lat pr

~
"""
',?~},",'"
:::,:-.''', ,.:',-.
,

med fac

Fig. 6. The palatine arch: lateral view; anterior to left; scale bars equal 5 mm; A, whole suspensorium,
B-G, anterior elements of the palatine arch; A - Cryptotomus roseus; B - Calotomus carolinus; C - Leptoscarus
vaigiensis, c - medial view of the palatine, c' - anterior view of the palatine; D - Bolbometopon muricatum;
E - Chlorurus gibbus; F - Hipposcarus longieeps, inset - medial view of the palatine; G - Searus psittaeus.
 20 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

6D,E). The form of the condyle also varies, with of epihyal-ceratohyal sutures (ef Gomon, 1979). In
marked differences in its orientation. A move to a contrast to most of the outgroups, except Pseudodax,
more ventral orientation (52.1) appears to be correlated the ceratohyal and epihyal of all scarids are joined by
with an overall increase in the strength of the jaws, cartilage (57.1). In Chlorurus, Hipposearus and Searus,
whilst an anteroventral orientation reflects greater a faint hint of a suture may be detected on the
mobility (Bellwood & Choat, 1990). In Leptosearus the dorsolateral margin of the joint, but the degree if
condyle is concave rather than convex (Fig. 6c'). In interdigitation is minimal. In all genera, there are five
Bolbometopon, reticulate bone may be found on the branchiostegal rays (60.1). The outgroups had either
dorsal surface of the palatine dorsal process (54.1), five or six branchiostegal rays. In all scarids, curved
whilst in Hipposearus, a large flat facet is present on dorsal projections on the ceratohyal and hypohyal form
the medial surface (53.1). This facet articulates with a an incomplete foramen (58.1), this appears to be a
corresponding facet located posteriorly on the lateral remnant of the beryciform foramen as found in the
face of the medial flange of the maxillary head. A ceratohyal and hypohyal of some (basal) labrids
superficially similar flange is present on the medial face (Gomon, 1979; Gomon & Paxton, 1985), but found in
of the palatine in odacids (Gomon & Paxton, 1985), and none of the outgroups. In all scarids and Pseudodax, the
articulates with the vomer. ventral hypohyal is expanded posteroventrally to or
The other bone in the palatine arch which shows beyond the point of attachment of the anteriormost
considerable variation within the Scaridae, and which branchiostegal ray (59.1). In other labrids the ventral
may be of phylogenetic significance, is the entopterygoid. hypohyal is usually short, and does not reach the
In Cryptotomus, Nieholsina, Calotomus and point of attachment of the anteriormost branchiostegal
Leptosearus, the entopterygoid is relatively elongate ray (Russell, 1988, figures an expanded ventral
extending anterodorsally towards the palatine (55.1). In hypohyal in Pseudolabrus lueulentus although P. miles
the remaining scarid genera and in all outgroups, the (personal observation) and allied genera have the shorter
entopterygoid is shorter. In most scarids and all condition).
outgroups, the entopterygoid is entire. In Cetosearus, In all scarids and some outgroup labrids, the urohyal
Bolbometopon and Chlorurus, the medial region of the is a low, elongate triangular shaped bone (61.1; depth
entopterygoid is perforated with a series of holes (49.1). less than 35% of length; Fig. 8) (deep in most outgroups),
The most unusual feature of the entopterygoid is the with dorsal and ventral processes projecting
presence of an entopterygoid lateral process found posteriorly. The curtain of bone connecting these two
only in Chlorurus (48.1). This process is characterised processes is concave in the outgroups, but deeply
by a lateral expansion of the dorsal margin of the notched in Pseudodax and all scarids (64.1). Both the
entopterygoid. This expansion forms a narrow strut, dorsal and ventral processes are expanded laterally. The
which is buttressed by one or two flanges dorsal process is narrowly spatulate or rounded, whilst
perpendicular to it. At the base of the entopterygoid the ventral process in scarids may be pointed
lateral process, a small hole marks the site at which the posteriorly narrowly spatulate (63.2), broadly spatulate
mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve (ramus (63.1) or tapering posteriorly with an expanded
mandibularis V) passes through the lateral process. A posterior extremity (63.3). In all instances it is broadly
small lateral flange may be present in some Searus rounded posteriorly in contrast to labrids in which it is
species (eg, S. globieeps and S. spinus). These are not almost always pointed (Cheilio and odacids have a
regarded as entopterygoid lateral processes, as there flared ventral process; 63.4). Anteriorly there are a pair
are no traces of buttresses and the trigeminal nerve of lateral processes which mark the site of the
invariably passes posterior to these flanges and not
through them.
The leading edge of the lateral process forms part ch eh
of a superficial tendinous connection of the ih
adductor mandibulae section Al. The buttresses form
two to three deep triangular fossae. The anterior fossa
is the site of origin of the deep portion of the Al
muscle, whilst the posterior fossae ae) is the site of
origin of the dorsomedial fibres of the A3 (Bellwood & br
Choat, 1990).

Hyoid arch (character 57 - 64)

Figs 7,8

Overall, the hyoid arch is relatively generalised (Fig.

7) and differs little from outgroup taxa. It also possesses Fig. 7. Hyoid arch of Cryptotomus roseus, lateral view,
features which are generally regarded as primitive in anterior to left, scale bar equals 5 mm, cartilage indicated by
labrids eg, traces of a beryciform foramen and the lack heavy stipple.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 21

connection with the ventral hypohyals. On the dorsal Branchial arches (characters 65 - 92)
surface, between these two processes is a single
ascending process which articulates with a ventrally Figs 9-12
expanded keel on the first basibranchial (Fig. 11). In
labrids, this process is usually represented by an The branchial arches and the pharyngeal apparatus of
elongate flange with a medial thickening leading to a scarids and other labroids have received a great deal of
rounded depression on the dorsal margin (Rognes, 1973; attention and are widely accepted as structures of
Stiassny & Jensen, 1987; Russell, 1988; personal considerable phylogenetic significance (Stiassny &
observations). In scarids, there is no flange, the Jensen, 1987). There are numerous published
ascending process has a narrow neck with a trumpet- descriptions of the branchial and pharyngeal
shaped end and a small depression in the dorsal structures of scarids (Gregory, 1933; Al-Hussaini, 1945;
surface (62.1). Monod, 1951; Board, 1956; Gohar & Latif, 1959;

~_;_;_ . ~~/~v~p_r
.• . =

...?::::>

.. ~

=A
J~~:;;o;;.,. .~_=-
Fig. 8. Urohyal: A-J, lateral view; a-j, ventral view; anterior to left; scale bars equal 10 mm; A-a - Cryptotomus
roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus; D-d - Leptosearus vaigiensis; E-e - Sparisoma
viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus gibbus; I-i - Hipposearus
longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
22 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Nelson, 1967; Yamaoka, 1980; Liem & Greenwood,

1981; Kaufman & Liem, 1982, Clements & Bellwood,
1989; Gobalet, 1989). Comparative studies primarily
compare scarids with other pharyngognath families (eg,
Nelson, 1967; Liem & Greenwood, 1981; Kaufman &
Liem, 1982), whilst the form of pharyngeal bones has
been widely used in taxonomic and systematic studies
of the family (eg, Hattori, 1976, 1984; Masuda, et al., e4
1984; Schultz, 1958, 1969).
Within the Scaridae, gill raker counts show
considerable inter- and intra-specific variability and are
therefore of limited use for taxonomic purposes at the
species level (Choat & Randall, 1986). However, they
are of considerable use in distinguishing genera
(Randall & Bruce, 1983; Bruce & Randall, 1985) and
Fig. 9. Dorsal branchial elements of Cryptotomus roseus,
appear to be of phylogenetic significance. Gill raker dorsal view, anterior to top, scale bar equals 5 mm, cartilage
counts of the ten scarid genera, based on values given is shaded in black.
in Smith (1959), Schultz (1969), Randall (1983a),
Randall & Bruce (1983), Masuda et al. (1984) and Bruce pharyngeal valve in the Scaridae (78.1).
& Randall (1985), are as follows: Cryptotomus - 10-11;
The first epibranchial is a thin "Y" -shaped element.
Nieholsina - 12-13; Calotomus - 8-14; Leptosearus -
The medial stalk supports the leading lip of the
10-14; Sparisoma - 10-21; Cetosearus - 20-26;
pharyngeal valve. The second and third epibranchials are
Bolbometopon - 16-18; Chlorurus - 39-75; Hipposearus
also modified when compared to those of labrids. In
- 45-65; Searus - 38-84.
scarids, they have elongate processes and lack the
In the outgroups, gill raker counts are relatively low
flattened laminae found in most labrids (et Yamaoka,
(12-23 in Bodianus, Gomon, 1979; 16-22 in Labrus,
1978; Gomon, 1979; Russell, 1988). The form of the
Quignard & Pras, 1986). The distinct jump to raker
elements described in Gobalet (1989) are typical of the
counts of over 35 appears to be a derived condition scarid condition.
(65.1). In addition to gill raker numbers, the form of
The fourth epibranchials are not associated with the
the posterior gill rakers also appears to be of
pharyngeal valve but do display unique modifications. In
significance. Within the Scaridae, most scarid genera
some labrids the fourth epibranchials may be laterally
possess branched posterior gill rakers, with straight gill
expanded, but this expansion is restricted to a
rakers being the derived condition (66.1). The
broadening of the lateral portion. None display the
widespread occurrence of straight gill rakers in the
hypertrophy characteristic of the scarid fourth
Labroidei, however, suggests that this condition is
epibranchial. In all scarids, the fourth epibranchial is
secondarily derived.
greatly expanded laterally to form a large flat wing
As in other labroids, the branchial arches of scarids which curves posterolaterally (77.1; Fig. 9). The margin
are highly modified. However, their structure differs of the wing is bordered by a vertical flange. The lateral
markedly from the typical labroid morphology. The wing is convex on the dorsal surface and deeply
anterior epibranchials are reduced and serve to support concave ventrally. The wing is usually rounded
the pharyngeal valve, the fourth epibranchial is greatly posteriorly but may be pointed as in Cryptotomus. In
expanded, and the pharyngeal jaws display a unique Leptosearus, the posterior portion is inflected ventrally.
shape and mode of tooth replacement. Basally, the fourth epibranchial has an elongate
Despite these differences, the branchial structure are condylar section bearing a large elongate concave
relatively uniform within the Scaridae, with most groove on the medial surface which articulates with the
intrafamilial variation being in the form of the pharyngeal upper pharyngeal.
dentition. Muscular associations are relatively uniform
throughout the family and follow the pattern described
DORSAL BRANCHIAL ELEMENTS. The dorsal branchial by Gobalet (1989).
elements comprise the epibranchials, infrapharyngo- In scarids, the first infrapharyngobranchials are
branchials and upper pharyngeal bones (Fig. 9). absent. The paired second infrapharyngobranchials
Gobalet (1989) provides a detailed description of the are represented by small rod-like bones with a slight
bones, their associations and related musculature III swelling and inflection mid-way along their length.
Searus. There is no associated tooth plate. The second
In scarids the form of the first three pairs of infrapharyngo- branchials are located medial to the
epibranchials differ markedly from the typical labrid second epibranchials and lie in the posterior portion of
condition, where they are much more robust. These the main pad of the pharyngeal valve.
differences are not interpreted as a series of character The largest of the dorsal elements are the paired
changes, rather, all are regarded as the result of a single upper pharyngeal bones (third infrapharyngobranchials
character change, namely the possession of a and associated tooth plates; Nelson, 1967). It is in the
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 23

form of the upper pharyngeal bones that the major phylogenetic significance. The morphology of the upper
differences between scarid genera are apparent (Fig. 10). pharyngeal bones of scarids is unique. Within the
Some of these differences were recognised by Smith Labroidei, only the upper pharyngeals of Pseudodax bear
(1956, 1959) and Schultz (1958, 1969) as taxonomically any resemblance to those of scarids.
useful characters for distinguishing genera. Differences When compared to the upper pharyngeals of most
in the morphology of these bones also appear to be of labrids, the upper pharyngeals of scarids are strongly
ne art fae

post proj
e4 art con

ne art fac

Fig. 10. Upper pharyngeal bones: A-I, ventral view; a, j, lateral view; anterior to left; scale bars equal 5
mm; A-a - Cryptotomus roseus; B - Nieholsina usta; C - Calotomus earolinus; D - Leptosearus vaigiensis;
E - Sparisoma viride; F - Cetosearus bieolor; G - Bolbometopon murieatum; H - Chlorurus gibbus; I -
Hipposearus longieeps; I-j - Searus psittaeus.
24 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

compressed laterally. The cladogram suggests that the alternating teeth on the two bones interdigitating
extent of this lateral compression increases within the down the midline (74.2). The extent of interdigitation
family. In labrids the paired upper pharyngeals are varies considerably and is generally reduced in large
more than twice as broad as high. In scarids they vary individuals. In most scarid genera, the two medial
from 1 to 1.9 times as wide as high (69.1) to less than teeth rows run parallel to each other (75.1), in
0.8 times as wide as high (69.2). In lateral view, the contrast to Cryptotomus, Nicholsina, Calotomus and
bones are triangular with an anteriorly oriented apex, Leptoscarus where the rows are curved and diverge
which may be bordered laterally by the alveolar posteriorly.
process (68.1, Fig. lOj). The posterior margin is a thin The dentigerous area of the upper pharyngeal
sheet of bone which bears a small posterior bones of labrids is broad. In scarids, it is relatively
projection (the insertion site of the retractor dorsalis). narrow, with an apparent reduction within the family
This projection is well developed Cryptotomus but (73.1-3; broad, length/total width of both bones less
reduced in all other scarid genera (76.1). Among the than 0.6, state 0; 0.6-0.9, state 1; 1.0-2.0, state 2;
outgroup taxa, a comparable process is present only in length greater than 2.1 times width, state 3). In large
Pseudodax. A large elongate condyle on the midlateral individuals the dentigerous area of the tooth plates is
surface represents the articulation site of the fourth parallel sided. In smaller individuals, it often narrows
epibranchial. On the dorsal surface each upper posteriorly. It has been suggested that this may be a
pharyngeal bone bears an elongate facet which result of rapid growth in small individuals with new,
articulates with the neurocranium. In labrids, this larger teeth erupting faster than the old teeth are
articulatory facet is short and strongly rounded. In all worn (G. Nelson, personal communication). In larger
scarids it is elongate, being either slightly curved individuals growth is reduced, with no significant
(67.1) or straight (67.2). change in size over the time period between tooth
eruption and loss.
In lab rids, teeth may erupt in the dental plates of
the upper pharyngeal bones. In all scarid genera, the VENTRAL BRANCHIAL ELEMENTS. Six unpaired
upper pharyngeal teeth erupt only from an anterior elements lie along the ventral midline (Fig. 11). The
germinative alveolar region and migrate posteriorly, basihyal is laterally compressed anteriorly and may bear
wearing progressively with use. Teeth erupt in rows and a ventral flange. In some Scarus species the basihyal is
maintain their relative position as they progress greatly reduced (Gobalet, 1989; also in Sparisoma). The
posteriorly, like conveyor-belts (71.2). Tooth rows are first basibranchial is a short, thin bone but is greatly
absent in the outgroups and their presence in scarids is expanded ventrally. The ventral margin of this bone is
considered derived. There may be one to three tooth
rows in each bone (70.1-2). A single row has only been
cbl cb2 cb3
recorded from adult individuals of Scarus
rubroviolaceus, S. perrico and S. compressus. Schultz
(1958) erected a separate genus Scarops for the former
two species based on this character. As these species
have two rows as juveniles and occasionally as adults
(Rosenblatt & Hobson, 1969; Schultz, 1969; personal
observation), the value of this character is questionable,
and is not considered sufficient to warrant recognition
of a separate genus or subgenus. Scarops is therefore
placed in synonymy with Scarus, following Rosenblatt
er bh bb1 bb2 bb3 bb4

& Hobson (1969), Randall & Bruce (1983) and Choat

& Randall (1986). Ontogenetic observations (Bellwood, ~s~"~~
1986) indicate that there is a progressive reduction in
hb3
the relative size of the teeth in the outermost tooth
rows. These changes are reflected in the adult
conditions (72.1-2; state 0, near equal tooth sizes in each
row; state 1, row 3 less than half row 2, row 1 and
2 subequal; state 2, row 3 less than half row 2 and row
2 less than half row 1). In addition to changes in the
relative sizes of the teeth the shape of the teeth may
differ markedly, particularly the medial tooth rows (1 on
each bone). Reduction in the size of the teeth in the
outer tooth row results in small rounded teeth. The teeth
in the medial row are usually an elongate ovoid shape
(74.1; rounded in most outgroups except Pseudodax). In Fig. 11. Anterior ventral branchial elements of Cryptotomus
Chlorurus, Hipposcarus and Scarus, however, these roseus, dorsal view - above, lateral view - below, anterior
teeth are curved and produced medially, with the to left, scale bar equals 5 mm, cartilage is shaded black.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 25

Fig. 12. Lower pharyngeal bones: A-J, dorsal view, anterior to bottom; a-j, lateral view, anterior to left;
scale bars equal 5 mm; A-a - Cryptotomus roseus; B-b - Nieholsina usta; C-c - Calotomus earolinus;
D-d - Leptosearus vaigiensis; E-e - Sparisoma viride; F-f - Cetosearus bieolor; G-g - Bolbometopon
murieatum; H-h - Chlorurus gibbus; I-i - Hipposearus longieeps; J-j - Searus psittaeus.
26 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

tightly bound by a ligament to the anterodorsal ridge of enamel, with a central depression (82.1». In
process of the urohyal. The second basibranchial is an most outgroups the dentigerous area has rounded
elongate hour-glass shaped rod, which may possess lateral margins. In Pseudodax and some scarids, the
lateral laminae. The third basibranchial is either a more whole dentigerous area is worn forming a concave or
elongate hour-glass shape or tapers posteriorly. It may slightly biconcave groove, the lateral margins of which
occasionally have small lateral laminae. The fourth may be distinctly raised (83.1). The condition in the
basibranchial is represented in most genera by a small scarids and Pseudodax, however, appears to be
cylindrical cartilaginous rod. In Cryptotomus, this homoplaseous.
element is lightly ossified. Either side of the dentigerous area are lateral horns,
The paired first and second hypobranchials, attach which bear insertion scars of the fifth adductor, levator
to the lateral margins of the second and third posterior and fourth levator externus muscles on the
basibranchials respectively. Basibranchial 4 receives dorsolateral extremities (scarring regions indistinct in
the dorsal portion of the third hypobranchial and Cryptotomus, Nieholsina and the outgroups). There are
the anterior portion of ceratobranchials 3 and 4. two main regions of scarring, with the inner area
The paired elements of the gill arches are relatively usually being the largest (84.1). The two regions may
light. The paired first and second hypobranchials are be separated by a straight anteroposteriorly oriented
flattened rods which taper towards the middle. Often ridge (85.1) (curved in Hipposearus, 85.2). On the
with laminae along the anterior and posterior posterolateral extremity each horn bears a distinct
margins. The third hypobranchial is a thin round facet/condyle. This represents the pharyngeal
ventrolaterally projecting rod or flattened element facet of the pharyngocleithral joint. In Hipposearus
which tapers distally. only, the lower pharyngeal jaw articulation facet is
Ceratobranchials 1, 2 and 3 are elongate rods. All may expanded laterally and extends beyond the site of
have anterior and/or ventrally directed laminae. the insertion scars (86.1). The main shaft of the
Ceratobranchial 4 is a thin bone with a small posterior lateral horn is usually broader (anteroposteriorly)
flange anteriorly. Posteriorly, it attaches to the ventral than deep (87.1). In labrids, the shaft is deeper
edge of the anteriormost part of the lateral expansion than broad and is taken to represent the plesiomorphic
of the fourth epibranchial. The fourth ceratobranchial state.
supports a hemibranch (there is no gill slit behind the In scarids, the ventral keel of the lower pharyngeal
fourth arch). The fifth ceratobranchials are fused and bone extends along the midline and is greatly
form the lower pharyngeal bone. This is described in expanded anteroventrally with a broad rounded portion
detail below. anteriorly (89.1; Fig. 12). In all outgroups, the keel is
relatively short and tapers anteriorly. The base of the
keel may arise anterior (as in the outgroups), on (88.2)
LOWER PHARYNGEAL BONE. All scarids share a
or posterior (88.1) to the broad ventral bar that connects
common pharyngeal morphology which differs the lateral horns. In most labrids, the keel is thickened
markedly from that of all other labroids (Fig. 12). In near the anterior margin forming a stout ridge. In
scarids, new lower pharyngeal teeth erupt only along Pseudodax and scarids, this thick ridge is not
the posterior margin of the dentigerous area and developed (91.1). Thickening is restricted to the
progress anteriorly (90.2). In other labroids the teeth proximal portion, with the remainder of the keel being
usually arise either in stacks (phyllodont sensu represented by a thin bony sheet. In Pseudodax and
Bellwood, 1990) or individually over the whole scarids, the ventral edge of the keel may bear small
dentigerous area. Unlike all the outgroups, where teeth lateral projections (92.1), or a laterally expanded flat
are either scattered or in non-linear patterns, the margin (92.2). Neither structure is present in the other
lower pharyngeal teeth of scarids form distinct outgroups.
transverse rows of five (79.2) to six teeth (79.1). The
teeth migrate anteriorly in rows, which results in a
straight-sided dentigerous area. This is in stark contrast Opercular series
to the triangular form in labrids. The dentigerous
areas may be broadly rectangular (81.1; length/width The four elements of the opercular series are
ratio of less than 0.7), square (81.2; IIw 0.7-1.3) or an relatively uniform throughout the family and have a
elongate rectangle (81.3; IIw greater than 1.5). The typical labroid appearance (e! Russell, 1988). The
number of tooth rows present at any given time varies preoperculum bears no spines or serrations and has an
from 5-25, with a sharp discontinuity between those entire posterior margin.
genera with 10 or less and those with 11 or more
(usually greater than 16; 80.1). The number of rows
does not increase simply as a result of an elongation of Pectoral girdle (characters 93 - 97)
the dentigerous area, the largest numbers were
recorded from Cetosearus and Bolbometopon which have Figs 13,14
relatively short dentigerous areas. As the teeth
progress anteriorly they wear, resulting in an elongate The pectoral girdle of scarids is relatively robust,
pair of ridges (most scarids) or a broad spindle-shaped with a typical labroid morphology (Fig. 13). In all
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 27

scarids, the first pectoral ray is rudimentary, the second those with 14 or more rays (modal values). This
ray is well developed and unbranched, the remaining 11 character was used by Schultz (1958) to separate the
to 15 rays are all branched. The number of pectoral rays Scaridae into two subfamilies. This character is
is highly variable in the outgroups, however, relatively included in the present analyses and appears to be of
high counts (greater than 14) appear to be the phylogenetic significance, but a subfamilial division is
plesiomorphic condition (Pseudodax 15, Bodianus 15-18, no longer supported.
Pseudolabrus 12-15, Odax 11-18). Within the family, In most scarid taxa there is a distinct round facet on
there is a distinct discontinuity between taxa the anterior face of the cleithrum (Fig. 14). This facet
encompassing species with 13 (97.1) pectoral rays and marks the articulation point of the synovial
pharyngocleithral joint. A contact between the lower
pharyngeal and the cleithrum is a characteristic of all
labroids (sensu Greenwood et aI., 1966; Kaufman &
A Liem, 1982). In Cryptotomus it is represented by an
elongate indistinct facet on the cleithrum as in labrids.
However, in most scarids this contact is marked by a
distinct facet (93.1). This suggests that the basic
mechanics of the labroid pharyngeal apparatus
have been modified in the Scaridae. In some scarid
genera, there is a medial indentation beneath the
pharyngocleithral facet (94.1) or a perforate region
above it (95.1). Both features are absent in the
outgroups. The functional implications of these
changes are unknown. The postcleithra have a typical
labrid form.
Scarids differ markedly from the labroid condition
in the form of the posttemporal. In scarids, the
posttemporal has an elongate posteroventral flange
which lies along the dorsal margin of the supracleithrum
(96.1; Fig. 13A). This flange is lacking in the labrids
and in all other labroid families, and therefore
appears to be an unique unreversed synapomorphy of
the Scaridae.

Fig. 13. Pectoral girdle of Crypfotomus roseus, lateral view,

anterior to left; A - posttemporal, scale bar equals 2 mm; B
- pectoral girdle, scale bar equals 5 mm. Pelvic girdle (characters 98 - 99)
Fig. 15
A B c
The pelvic girdle consists of two laterally paired
basipterygia which support the pelvic fins
posteriorly. The basic form of the basipterygia is
uniform within the family, with the bones tapering
anteriorly. However, unlike those of labrids where the
bones are pointed anteriorly, in scarids they may be
either broadly rounded (99.2) or bear short lateral
flanges (99.1; Fig. 15). At the posterior margin of the
medial symphysis the bones are often protruded, and
in Chlorurus and Scarus bear distinct horns (98.1;
Fig. 15).

med horns

Fig. 14. Cleithra: anterior view; scale bars equal 5 mm; A

- Cryptotomus roseus; B - Leptosearus vaigiensis; C - Searus Fig. 15. Pelvic girdle of Searus psittaeus, dorsal view, anterior
psittaeus. to left, scale bar equals 5 mm.
28 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Axial skeleton (characters 100 - 105) 4 (and occasionally 5) the haemal postzygopophyses
are expanded to a lesser extent, and are connected
Figs 16-19 to the posterior margins of the parapophyses by a
bony curtain which extends along the lateral edge of
All scarids have 25 vertebrae, including the urostyle the centrum (103.1; Fig. 17). This connection is most
(105.2). This vertebral count is common among the pronounced on vertebra 3, but differs in extent between
Labridae (Leis & Rennis, 1983) and may represent the genera.
plesiomorphic condition for the Labroidei (sensu The paired parapophyses of the posterior 4 to 6
Greenwood et aI., 1966) as a whole. However, the precaudal vertebrae are connected by a transverse bony
cladogram infers a close relationship between the bridge, forming a small (primary) haemal arch.
Hypsigenyini, Pseudodax and the Scaridae and Parapophyses thus connected, may be termed
suggests that the presence of 25 vertebrae in the
Scaridae is a reduction from the ancestral condition
(27+) and therefore represents a synapomorphy uniting
the family.
Within the Scaridae the number of precaudal
vertebrae typically varies from 9 to 11, with
Bolbometopon being the sole exception with 12 (101.1).
Variability in this character in the outgroups makes
polarity assignment difficult, however, the cladogram
suggests that within the Scaridae 9 precaudal vertebrae
is the plesiomorphic condition, with an increase to 10 B
to 11 being a derived state (101.2). A precaudal count
of 10 to 11 was one of the characters used by
Schultz (1958) to define the subfamily Scarinae. This
character appears to be of phylogenetic significance,
but a subfamilial division is not supported by the data
in the present study.
In all outgroups examined, the first neural spine is
autogenous. In the Scaridae this spine is fused with the
centrum (100.1), and is of a comparable length to
c
subsequent spines (Fig. 16). The size of the anterior
neural prezygopophyses is highly variable. They are
usually small and simple but may be expanded
anterodorsally almost reaching the neural spine of the
preceding vertebra.
All scarids are characterised by a unique
posterolateral expansion of the haemal D
postzygopophyses on the first 1 to 2 vertebrae
(102.1-2; Figs 16, 17). These expanded postzygopophyses
usually have a strong central ridge. On vertebrae 3 and

n Sp-----,11
E

v1

Fig. 17. Anterior vertebrae: ventral view, anterior to left, scale

bars equal 5 mm; A - Cryptotomus roseus; B - Calotomus
Fig. 16. Anterior vertebrae and dorsal spines of Cryptotomus carolinus; C - Leptoscarus vaigiensis; D - Bolbometopon
roseus, lateral view, anterior to left, scale bar equals 2 mm. muricatum; E - Searus psittaeus.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 29

haemapophyses (Clothier, 1950; Russell, 198~). The Dorsal fin (characters 106 - 109)
posterior part of the vertebral column compnses 14
Figs 16,18
to 16 caudal vertebrae. These vertebrae, with the
exception of the highly modified ~rostyle and
In most labrid and scarid genera, a single supraneural
penultimate vertebra, are charactensed by the
(predorsal) bone is present anterior to the first neural
possession of a haemal spine. Th.e structure of the
spine. It is a relatively narrow curved rod-shap~d bone
first haemal spine (character 104; FIgS 18, 19) appears
with a slight expansion distally. The loss of thIS bone
to be of considerable phylogenetic significance.
in Odax, Chlorurus and Searus is considered derived
In most labrids the first haemal spine is relatively
(106.1). .
robust (see range in Russell,. 1988). Howe.v~r,
In all scarids, there are 18 dorsal pteryglOphores
Pseudodax Bodianus and all scands share a modIfIed
supporting nine spinous and ten branched segmented
first haem~l spine (104.1). In scarid gepera with nine
rays (the last 2 rays are closely apposed and are count~d
precaudal vertebrae, the first haemal spine arises from
as 1). The nine anterior pterygiophores are broad, WIth
the middle of the bone bridge joining a pair of
a narrow central shaft which expands and thickens
haemapophyses. The first haemal spi~e is usu~lly
dorsally, at this point each dorsal spine is attached ~y
exceedingly thin and projects postenorly, CurVlllg
a ring joint. The dorsal spines may be pungent (as In
posteroventrally. The next vertebra has either a. more
most labrids) or flexible (108.1). A small posterodorsal
robust haemal spine arising from a pan of
projection present on the first eight pterygiophores
haemapophyses, or an almost completely [Link]
appears to be expanded on the ninth ptery?iophore and
haemal spine, the fusion been marked only by a shght
serves as the site of attachment of the fIrst branched
inflection in the spine when viewed laterally.
ray. The remaining nine pterygiophores have a thin ~haft
Subsequent vertebrae have completely fused haemal
bearing a narrow blade posteriorly, each supports ~ slllgle
spines. In genera with ten to 12 precau?~l vertebrae,
branched ray with the exception of the last pteryglOph?re
the first haemal spine is usually robust, anslllg from the
which supports two small rays. The base o~ the fIrst
middle of the bridge joining a pair of haemapophyses.
pterygiophore is located between the neu~al spInes of the
The next haemal spine occasionally possess a slight
first and second vertebrae (107.1), thIS represents a
inflection, all subsequent spines are completely fused. In
departure from the typicallabrid condition [Link] first
these genera, the first haemal spine is [Link]
pterygiophore lies between the neural spllles of
preceded by a small thin rudimentary haemal spine WhICh
vertebrae 2 and 3 (Gomon, 1979; Russell, 1988). The
arises from a pair of haemapophyses on the last
remaining pterygiophores are each located. between
precaudal vertebra.
successive pairs of spines, the last two pteryglOphores,
A thin first haemal spine which arises from the
however are both located between the neural spines
middle of a bridge joining the last pair of parapophyses
of the 17th and 18th vertebrae. The dorsal fin membrane
(haemapophyses) appears to be one of the ~ey c?~racter
may be either deeply incised or continuous (109.1), the
states which links the Scaridae and HypsIgenyInI (and
cladogram suggests that the latter condition is derived.
Pseudodax and Laehnolaimus). This shared character
state supports the proposal that the Scaridae, Pseudod~x
and the hypsigenyine labrids form a monophyletIc Anal fin (character 110)
assemblage that diverged early from the rest of the Fig. 18
Labridae (Gomon, 1979).
All scarids possess ten anal pterygiophores which
support three spines and ten branched segmented

haem
haem

hspl

Fig. 18. Middle axial skeleton of Cryptotomus roseus, lateral Fig. 19. First caudal vertebra of Chlorurus gibbus, anterior
view, anterior to left, scale bar equals 5 mm. view, scale bar equals 10 mm.
30 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

rays. The last two rays are closely apposed and are Unlike labrids, the parhypural is foreshortened
counted as one. The first pterygiophore has a bony (111.1). It has no attachment to the urostyle or ventral
crest along the distal anterior margin. Separation of hypural plate, it lacks a hypurapophysis, and is
the crest anteriorly, as in Cryptotomus (Fig. 18), is usually preceded by a laterally compressed process on
atypical. The remaining pterygiophores typically the anterior margin of the ventral hypural plate. A
possess only a small posterior bony crest at the foreshortening of the parhypural was not recorded in
ventral inflection. The first pterygiophore supports any other labroid family and appears to be a unique
two spines, the second pterygiophore supports the synapomorphy uniting the Scaridae. A laterally
third spine and the first branched ray. All spines are compressed process on the anterior face of the ventral
attached by ring joints. The spines may be pungent hypural plate is found in all scarid genera, although
or flexible. Pterygiophores 3 to 9 each bear one the size of the protrusion varies considerably, from a
branched ray, the two small rays on the last (10th) trace in Cetosearus (112.2) to almost complete closure
pterygiophore are counted as one. across the space left by the short parhypural (112.1) as
In scarids, as in labrids, there are usually two in Cryptotomus and Nieholsina. This structure is
to three (exceptionally 0) pterygiophores anterior to usually absent in labrids but has been recorded in
the first haemal spine, the presence of four Choerodon by Gomon (1979).
pterygiophores in Bolbometopon is considered derived The haemal spine of the penultimate (24th)
(110.2). The remaining pterygiophores are each centrum is autogenous, but closely associated with
located between successive pairs of haemal spines, the centrum. The neural process of the penultimate
with the exception of the last two pterygiophores vertebra is represented by a short protrusion (113.1).
which are located between the spines of the 17th and A short neural process is present in some labrid
18th vertebrae. genera eg, Haliehoeres and Pseudolabrus, but a long
process in Bodianus and Pseudodax suggest that
the foreshortening in the Scaridae represents a
Caudal skeleton (characters 111 - 114) derived condition and therefore a synapomorphy of
the Scaridae. The haemal spine of the antepenultimate
Fig. 20 (23rd) vertebra is fused with the centrum.
The caudal rays usually comprise, starting dorsally:
The caudal skeleton bears a close resemblance to that five to seven pro current unsegmented, unbranched
of labrids (ef Gomon, 1979; Stiassny & Jensen, 1987; rays; one unbranched ray approximately half length of
Russell, 1988). There are two epural bones, hypurals 1 segmented rays, from tip of posterior epural, often
and 2 are fused forming a ventral hypural plate, segmented, especially in small individuals; one
hypurals 3 and 4 fuse to form the dorsal hypural plate. segmented unbranched ray from hypural 5; six
Basally, hypurals 3 and 4 are fused with a fused branched segmented rays, from dorsal hypural plate;
uroneural/urostyle block. No sutures are visible five branched segmented rays, from entral hypural
between any of these elements. Hypural 5 is a short plate; one unbranched segmented ray from
bone lying close to the dorsal margin of the dorsal parhypural; one ray from tip of haemal spine of
hypural plate. Basally, the ventral hypural plate is penultimate vertebra, unbranched, half length of
closely associated with the urostyle but remains segmented rays, often segmented in small individuals;
autogenous. five to six unbranched unsegmented procurrent rays.
The number of principal caudal rays (7+6; ie, the rays
supported by the hypurals and parhypural; 114.1)
represents a significant departure from the counts
recorded in labrids (7+7, 7+8, Leis & Rennis, 1983; 8+8,
Russell, 1988).

per
Lipid in bones (character 115)

The presence or absence of lipid in the bones when

prepared by either maceration in hot water or
defleshing in a dermestid beetle colony, may reflect
basic differences in the lipid metabolism of scarids
versus labrids and other labroids. In all labrid, odacid,
pomacentrid, embiotocid and cichlid material examined
that had been prepared in this manner, the bones had
pah hyp1-2
an oily property when dried. With time, the bones
turned brown, presumably as the lipid oxidises. In
Fig. 20. Caudal skeleton of Cryptotomus roseus, lateral view, contrast, the bones of scarids were invariably white
anterior to left, scale bar equals 5 mm. with no evidence of lipid (115.1).
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 31

Soft anatomy 1. Cryptotomus (Fig. 21), Nieholsina (Fig. 22A),

Calotomus (Fig. 22B), Leptosearus (Fig. 23A). Adductor
Jaw muscles (characters 116 - 125) mandibulae sub divisions AI, A2 and A3 are all well
developed in these genera. All are weakly pinnate.
Figs 21-25 The Al is a single superficial muscle, occupying a
mid-lateral position, it arises from the vertical limb and
Considerable variation is displayed in the form of angular region of the preoperculum and the posterior
the jaw muscles between scarid genera. Within the edge of the hyomandibula. It inserts via a long tendon
Scaridae there are five basic configurations of the jaw (Alt) which passes medial to the maxillary shaft before
muscles. To facilitate descriptions, the five basic types inserting on the anteroventral extremity of the
will be described separately. The genera may be premaxillary process of the maxilla. In Cryptotomus and
grouped according to their muscle configurations as Calotomus this insertion is onto a small ventrally
follows: 1. Cryptotomus, Nieholsina, Calotomus, protruding rod. A small tendon connects the Alt to the
Leptosearus; 2. Sparisoma; 3. Cetosearus, Bolbometopon; articular; another small tendon connects Alt and A2t (2
4. Chlorurus; 5. Hipposearus, Searus. tendons in Cryptotomus).

f// /'-"'"'-'--A3

in A 1

aii

mx pmx fig

Fig. 21. Myology of the oral jaws of Cryptotomus roseus: A - integument and infraorbital bones removed,
scale bar equals 5 mm; ai - as A, except adductor mandibulae sections Ai and A2 removed; aii - details
of upper jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 5 mm; aiii - details of lower jaw, medial
view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 5 mm.
32 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

The A2 occupies the ventral part of the is a single muscle mass. The lower portion or part of
suspensorium. Its origin occupies the whole of the ventral the A2 invariably inserts muscularly on the posterior
part of the quadrate, and may extend posteriorly to margin of the articular. The dorsal part or portion
include the part of the angular portion of the inserts wholly or partially on the articular posterior
preoperculum. In Cryptotomus and Nicholsina it has ascending process. The dorsal fibres may converge on
two distinct portions, in Calotomus and Leptoscarus it a broad thin tendon (A2t) which passes medial to this

-H------i-,A1 lap
~'----

A2

aiii

in A 1---1'----""

-+H--A3

inA2
in A3t2
in A3t1

Fig. 22. Myology of the oral jaws: A-aiii, Nicholsina ustus; A - integument and infraorbital bones removed,
scale bar equals 10 mm; ai - as A, except adductor mandibulae sections Al and A2 removed; aii - details
of upper jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 5 mm; aiii - details of lower jaw, medial
view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 3 mm. B-bi, Calotomus carolinus; B - integument and infraorbital
bones removed, scale bar equals 10 mm; bi - as B, except adductor mandibulae sections Al and A2 removed.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 33

process and inserts on the posterior part of the ridge on of the intermandibularis. The Aw~ has been variously
the medial face of the dentary coronoid process. In referred to as the adduktor-symphysialier (Lubosch,
Cryptotomus and Nicholsina this tendon is small, in 1923), the Aw (Lubosch, 1929), the abductor portion of
Calotomus it is well developed and in Leptoscarus it is the Aw (Gobalet, 1980), and Awa (Bellwood & Choat,
absent. 1990).
The A3 is a large muscle which lies medial to the The Awy comprises a series of fibres which connect
superficial Al and A2 portions. Sites of origin include the anterodorsal extremity of the medial flange on the
the hyomandibula, preoperculum, symplectic, quadrate, articular anterior ascending process and the medial
and metapterygoid. The only portion visible laterally is face of the dentary, at the base of the coronoid
the posterodorsal extremity. The origin of the muscle in process. The muscle fibres either radiate from a single
this region is often divided by levator arcus palatini. point on the tip of the articular medial spine or arise
The fibres converge dorsally onto a large tendon which from a small tendon which inserts on this point. The
runs along the anterodorsal edge of the muscle. A broad Awy has been referred to as the M. articulari-dentalis
bundle of fibres arising from the anterodorsal edge of by Lubosch (1923), the adductor portion of the Aw by
this tendon insert on the medial surface of the dentary Gobalet (1980) and Aw~ by Bellwood & Choat (1990).
coronoid process (occasionally also connecting with the In all species a short intermandibularis is present
A2t). These fibres are clearly visible in Cryptotomus and connecting the two dentaries.
Nicholsina (Aw?; Figs 21ai, 22ai) but are reduced in
Calotomus and Leptoscarus. They correspond with the 2. Sparisoma (Fig. 23B). In Sparisoma, the form of
"A3~" of Dietz (1914) and Stiassny (1981). Winterbottom the adductor muscles differs significantly from the
(1974) considers these fibres to be part of the Aw genera described above, but displays considerable
section. The A3 tendon may split prior to insertion. The variability within the genus.
larger, ventral portion (A3t1) inserts on the midmedial The Al is a single muscle mass which is
surface of the articular onto the coronomeckelian. The multipinnate in larger specimens. The superficial fibres
smaller, dorsal portion (A3t2) passes medial to the of Al converge on a short round tendon (Alt) which
ventral portion and inserts on the anterodorsal extremity passes medial to the maxillary arm before inserting on
of the flange on the ventral edge of the anterior a raised process on the ventromedial base of the
ascending process. This dorsal division is extremely premaxillary process of the maxilla. There is a small
small or absent in Leptoscarus. In Cryptotomus and tendon connecting Alt and the dorsal tendon of A2
Nicholsina the fibres on the dorsal margin of the A3 (A2t1).
have a thin tendinous insertion (A3t3) along a ridge on The degree of association between Al and A2 varies
the medial face of the dentary coronoid process. This greatly. In most species the muscle fibres of these two
insertion is immediately anterior to the dentary insertion sections are closely associated basally. In the larger
of the A2t. species S. cretensis, S. strigatus and S. viride, the deeper
In all four genera, the main Awdivision (Awa) has fibres of the Al representing about 30% of the total
a posterior tendinous attachment to the medial face of muscle volume, converge on to the A2tI.
the quadrate. Anteriorly, the muscle fibres arise broadly The A2 is a large superficial muscle occupying the
within the Meckelian fossa, extending over the flange whole of the ventromedial area of the suspensorium. It
which joins the descending and anterior ascending has two distinct divisions, although this may be
processes. A few dorsal fibres insert on the medial face obscured superficially by the tendinous sheet which
of the dentary. Immediately anterior to the main Aw covers the outer surface of the whole of the adductor
(Awa) is a complex collection of short muscle fibres muscle mass. The dorsal division of A2 (A2a) is usually
which co~prise the sub-divisions Aw~ and Awa. the largest division, except in small specimens or in small
In Leptoscarus and to a lesser extent Calotomus, the species such as S. radians. The A2a arises from the
posterior tendon of Awa is expanded and has a covering quadrate, angular region of the preoperculum, the
of muscle fibres. This structure was described as separate symplectic and the ventral region of the hyomandibula.
muscle, the M. adductor mandibulae medialis, by Fibres in this subdivision are strongly pinnate in large
Lubosch (1923) and later (Lubosch, 1929) the M. specimens. The A2a has two insertion sites. Superficial
quadrato mandibularis internus. ventral fibres converge on a short tendon (A2t2) which
The clear homology of the main Aw muscle division inserts on the medial face of the dentary coronoid
(Awa) in scarids and the Aw of other labroids process near to the posteroventral edge. The bulk of the
necessitates a revision of the terminology applied to A2a comprising the dorsal and medial fibres, converge
the smaller Aw subdivisions within the Scaridae. In anteriorly on a large tendon (A2t1) which inserts on the
this study, the main Aw subdivision is designated Awa medial or lateral face of the posterior extremity of the
and the smaller anterior subdivisions Aw~ and Awy. alveolar process of the premaxilla.
In all four genera the Aw~ and Awy are closely In the larger species, S. cretensis, S. strigatus and S.
associated. The Aw comprises a series of parallel viride, and to a lesser extent in S. aurofrenatum, S.
muscle fibres which connect the leading face of the chrysopterum and S. rubripinne, the A2t1 is associated
articular medial flange and the posteroventral edge of with fibres from all three major adductor muscle
the dentary, in the region ventral to the insertion site divisions, sections AI, A2 and A3.
34 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

The anterior region of A2a is tightly connected by The small subdivision A2~ is restricted to the
connective tissue to the dorsal part of the articular anteroventral region of the suspensorium. It arises from
posterior ascending process. Basally the Ala is usually the anterior region of the quadrate and inserts along the
closely associated with the Al and A2~. posterior edge of the articular ascending process.

A3

A2

B
A3

At

A3

A2t2

A2P
~

w'Y

Fig. 23. Myology of the oral jaws: A-ai, Leptoscarus vaigiensis; A - integument and infraorbital bones removed,
scale bar equals 5 mm; ai - as A, except adductor mandibulae sections Al and A2 removed. B-bv, Sparisoma
viridis; B - integument and infraorbital bones removed, scale bar equals 20 mm; bi - as B, except adductor
mandibulae sections Al and A2 removed; bii - details of upper jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale
bar equals 5 mm; biii - details of lower jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 20 mm; biv
- details of lower jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 5 mm, with the bulk of Aw removed;
bv - as biv, except for the removal of Aw and the quadrate.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 35

Dorsally, it is closely associated with A2a. muscle is attached to this ridge. The Awl) has three
The A3 is a large muscle lying medial to Al and insertions. These are most clearly seen in the larger
Al. It arises from the hyomandibular, metapterygoid, species. The tendinous sheet covering the muscle
symplectic and quadrate, the site of origin often being consolidates anteriorly forming a broad tendon (Awl)t1)
divided dorsally by the site of origin of the levator arcus which inserts on the medial surface of the dentary. A
palatini. The A3 division has three possible insertion few fibres along the ventral edge of the Awl) insert
sites. In larger species (eg, S. ere tens is, S. strigatus and muscularly directly onto the medial surface of the
S. viride), the superficial fibres converge on a small articular at the base of the anterior ascending
tendon which fuses with the medial surface of the process, medial to the insertion of A3t2. A few of
common tendon A2tI. In all species, the bulk of the the most ventral fibres converge on a small tendon
fibres, from the central region of the muscle, converge (Awl)t2) that inserts on the posterodorsal margin of
on a short broad tendon (A3t1) which inserts on the the articular medial spine. A short sheet of tendon
medial face of the dentary, at the base of the coronoid connects a ridge on the medial face of the quadrate to
process. On the medial surface some fibres insert the lateral surface of the Awl) just prior to its dorsal
muscularly with the whole muscle being covered by a insertion (Fig. 23biv). In small species the ventral
thin tendinous sheet. The remaining portion of the A3, margin of Awl) is almost confluent with the dorsal
comprising the anteromedial fibres, converge on a more margin of Awa.
elongate tendon (A3t2) which passes under the ventral
3. Cetoscarus, Bolbometopon (Fig. 24A,B). When
edge of the coronoid process and insert on the medial
compared to Sparisoma the adductor mandibulae of
surface of the articular anterior ascending process half
Cetoscarus and Bolbometopon are relatively simple. The
way along its length near to the dorsal margin (120.1).
In most labrids and scarids the insertion of the A3 is three main sections are well developed and strongly
pinnate (bi- or multi-pinnate; 122.1). In most scarids and
on the articular. A few fibres arising on the lateral face
all outgroups the fibres are weakly pinnate.
of A3t2 insert on the ventral medial surface of the
The Al arises from the ascending arm of the
dentary coronoid process. A small tendon connects the
ventral margin of A3t1 to the dorsal margin of A3t2. preoperculum, the posterior margin of the hyomandibula,
the metapterygoid and the symplectic. Superficial
On the medial face of the jaws, the Aw section in fibres also arise from the tendinous sheet which covers
Sparisoma is well developed. The main posterior portion the whole adductor muscle mass. The Al inserts via a
(Awa) has two tendinous sheets attaching to the short thick tendon on the middle of the medial face of
quadrate and a large body of muscle fibres crossing the maxillary arm (116.1), at the end of a ridge which
the lower jaw articulation. Anteriorly, the Awa inserts extends from the base of the maxillary medial process
tendinously on the posteroventral edge of the dentary (cf Fig. 2F,G). In all outgroups and most other scarids,
immediately lateral to the insertion of the protractor the insertion of the Al is onto the premaxillary process
hyoideus. The lateral surface of the Aw is closely of the maxilla.
attached by tendons and connective tissue to the medial The origin of the A2 include the preoperculum,
surface of the articular descending process. symplectic, and quadrate. It inserts via a short thick
Anteriorly, the Awj3 and Awy are distinct subdivisions. tendon on the medial face of the dentary coronoid
The Awj3 connects the anterior edge of the articular process near to the posterodorsal edge. In Cetoscarus a
flange/spine to the posteroventral margin of the dentary few fibres insert on the posterior margin of the posterior
immediately above the insertion of the main Awa. The ascending process of the articular. In Bolbometopon
Awy connects the tip of the flange/spine on the articular there is a second small tendinous insertion on the distal
descending process to the medial face of the dentary. medial surface of the posterior ascending process of the
In addition to these subdivisions, the adductor articular.
muscles of Sparisoma are unique in that they include The A3 arises from the entopterygoid, metapterygoid,
a large subdivision arising on the medial face of the hyomandibula and quadrate. It has two tendinous
suspensorium (125.1). The sites of origin and insertions. The largest insertion (A3t1) is on the dorsal
insertions of this muscle strongly suggest that it arose part of the medial face of the dentary coronoid process.
as a dorsal expansion of the Aw division of the The second, smaller, insertion is on the medial face of
adductor mandibulae. It is therefore regarded herein as the articular near the base of the posterior ascending
a dorsal division of the Aw, and named Awl). This process.
muscle was figured and described in Sparisoma cretense The Awa is present, but is only represented by a
by Board (1956) but was not named. small muscle connecting the medial surface of the
The Awl) is a large muscle covering a large anterior part of the quadrate to the flange on the
proportion of the medial surface of the suspeIlsorium. descending process of the articular. Anteriorly, the Awj3
Its site of origin includes the medial surface· of the and Awy are present as in Sparisoma.
quadrate, metapterygoid, entopterygoid and pterygoid
and may be bordered posteriorly by a ridge on the 4. Chlorurus (Fig. 24C). In Chlorurus the adductor
entopterygoid and metapterygoid. It may displace the muscles are all well developed. The major divisions,
anterior portion of the adductor arcus palatini. A thin Ala, A2, and A3 all have strongly multipinnate fibres
tendinous sheet which covers the surface of the (122.1).
36 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

The Al is expanded and covers the greater part of hyomandibula, metapterygoid and symplectic, and from
the superficial area of the adductor muscle mass. The the tendinous sheet which covers the adductor muscle
Al has two major subdivisions, the main Ala and a mass. It inserts via a thick round tendon on the medial
dorsal division AI~. Ala arises from the preoperculum, face of the maxillary arm, at the base of the medial

1-,'~~-+-.A3

in A
..-r-+-or AT

in A3at --f1t--.A3a

A2

cii
post mx pmx fig

A1p_ _---'"

in A we--'--"U." +-I---~..c.,...-h''-----+t---A w'Y

A Tt

Fig. 24. Myology of the oral jaws: A - Cetoscarus bicolor, integument, infraorbital bones and adductor
mandibulae section Ai removed, scale bar equals 20 mm; B - Bolbometopon muricatum, integument,
infraorbital bones and adductor mandibulae section Ai removed, scale bar equals 20 mm; C-ciii, Chlorurus
sordidus: C - integument and infraorbital bones removed, scale bar equals 20 mm; ci - as C, except adductor
mandibulae section Ai removed; cii - details of upper jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals
10 mm; ciii - details of lower jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 10 mm.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 37

process. An extremely small tendon connecting the covering the adductors. Anteriorly it converges on a
medial surface of Ala to the base of the articular thin round tendon which inserts on the medial surface
ascending process is present as in the genera described of the maxillary arm, at the base of the medial process.
above. A few of the anteroventral fibres converge on a small
The Alf3 arises from the palatine and entopterygoid tendon which inserts on the medial posterodorsal
and inserts muscularly on the medial face of the extremity of the dentary coronoid process.
maxilla, dorsal to the insertion of Alat. The lower The A2 arises from the quadrate and inserts via a
fibres of Alf3 may insert on the dorsal margin of short tendon on the posterior edge of the medial face
Alat. In large individuals the anterior region of Alf3 of the dentary coronoid process.
has a tendinous sheath. Within the Alf3 there are often In comparison with other scarids and most
five subdivisions visible. The four superficial outgroups, the A3 is greatly reduced (121.1). It is
divisions arise from the palatine. The deeper portion represented merely by a thin multipinnate muscle,
arises from a deep anterior cavity which is formed with origins on the hyomandibula, entopterygoid,
by the buttressed entopterygoid lateral process. An metapterygoid and quadrate. It has two equally sized
Alf3 was not recorded in the outgroups, and in the insertions. The dorsal fibres converge on a narrow
Scaridae has only been recorded from Chlorurus and round tendon which inserts on the dorsomedial surface
Searus (118.1). of the dentary coronoid process. The ventral fibres
The A2 arises from the quadrate, symplectic, converge on a broad tendon which inserts on the medial
preoperculum and the superficial tendinous sheet face of the articular ascending process and on the distal
which covers the adductor muscle mass. A dorsal end of the articular medial spine.
aponeurosis converges with a tendinous medial septum In Hipposcarus, the Awa is represented by a small
to form a short round tendon which inserts on the thin sheet of fibrous muscle connecting the anterior
medial face of the dentary coronoid process (Fig. 24ci). medial face of the quadrate and a mass of connective
The A3 arises from the quadrate, entopterygoid tissue which is associated with the anterior portions of
(including the main deep cavity at the base of the Aw, Awf3 and Awy. These subdivisions are comparable
entopterygoid lateral process), metapterygoid and to those of Chlorurus, but there is no AWE.
hyomandibula, and posterodorsally from the superficial There is a tendinous attachment between the ventral
tendinous sheet. The large medial/posterodorsal margin of the Alt and the dorsal margin of the A2t.
portion of the A3, designated A3a, contains tendinous This connection approaches the condition found in
septa which converge anteriorly to form a single large Searus species and, although not complete, is regarded
round tendon which inserts on the medial surface of as a functional coupling of the Al and A2 sections in
the dentary coronoid process near to its dorsal margin. Hipposearus. Fusion of these sections was only found
The anteroventral fibres of A3, designated A3f3, arise in these two genera and is therefore considered derived
from the anterior region of the quadrate and are covered (117.1).
by a thin tendinous sheet which consolidates anteriorly
to form a small strap-like tendon which inserts on the
Hipposearus and Searus - Searus (Fig. 25B). The
medial surface of the articular near to the base of the
condition in Searus most closely resembles that of
articular medial spine. A few fibres of A3f3 insert
Hipposearus. The adductors are generally only
muscularly below this tendinous insertion.
moderately well developed and all are weakly pinnate.
Section Aw differs markedly from all the genera
described above (and all outgroups). The posterior The Al is a relatively large muscle with a small dorsal
portion (Awa) connecting the quadrate and articular is division, the Alf3. The larger ventral portion of AI, Ala
lost (124.2), although the two anterior portions Awf3 and and the A2 are fused to form a single muscle complex,
Awy, are distinct and well developed. There is also a the Ala/A2 (117.1). In some species, a superficial
unique additional muscle present in Chlorurus, the AWE division may be visible between the two muscles, but
(123.1; = Awy of Bellwood, 1986 and Bellwood & Choat, in all cases the two sections are tightly bound
1990). This portion connects the ventromedial edge of anteriorly. The Ala/A2 arises from the hyomandibula,
the dentary coronoid process to the dorsal surface of preoperculum, metapterygoid, entopterygoid, quadrate,
the articular ascending process, immediately above the and the fibrous sheet covering the medial portion of
lower jaw articulation. The insertion sites of AWE and section A3. Fibres in the dorsal region converge on a
its proximity to Awy, suggest that AWE developed as a thick tendon Ala/A2t1 which inserts on the medial
lateral expansion of Awy. face of the maxillary arm, at the base of the medial
process. Fibres in the anteroventral region converge on
5. Hipposearus and Searus - Hipposearus (Fig. 25A). a strong round tendon the Ala/A2t2 which inserts on
In Hipposearus, the adductors are only moderately the medial face of the dentary coronoid process, near
developed, with the largest sections Al and A2 having its dorsal margin. The remaining fibres in the mid region
weakly pinnate fibres. of the Ala/A2 complex converge on a strong tendinous
The Al is the largest division and has no dorsal belt which connects the ventral surface of the Ala/A2t1
subdivision. It arises from the hyomandibula, and the dorsal surface of the Ala/A2t2.
preoperculum, metapterygoid and symplectic, and to a The small dorsal portion Alf3, arises from the
limited extent, from the superficial tendinous sheet entopterygoid. The ventral fibres of Alf3 converge with
38 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

the dorsal surface of the tendon Al a/A2t1 , the dorsal maxilla to the maxillary arm (116.1); fusion of Al and
fibres insert muscularly at the base of the medial A2 (117.1); presence of an Al~ (118.1); insertion of the
process of the maxilla, above the insertion of Ala/A2t1. A2 restricted to the dentary (loss of the articular
Section A3 in Searus is represented by an insertion, 119.1); inclusion of the dentary in the insertion
exceedingly thin narrow muscle which lies beneath the of A3 (120.1-2); A3 greatly reduced (121.1); multipinnate
larger Ala/A2 complex. The A3 arises from the fibres (122.1); presence of an AWE (123.1); presence of
hyomandibula, metapterygoid, symplectic and quadrate. an Awo (125.1); enlargement (124.1) or loss (124.2) of
The weakly pinnate fibres fuse with an elongate dorsal the Awa.
aponeurosis which consolidates to form a thin strap-like
tendon A3t which inserts on the medial face of the
articular, immediately above the base of the articular Pharyngeal muscles (characters 126, 127)
medial spine. Anteriorly, a few muscle fibres connect the
dorsal margin of the A3t with the medial surface of the The pharyngeal apparatus of scarids follows the
dentary coronoid process. Comparable fibres in the typical labroid pattern (ef Liem & Greenwood, 1981;
Labridae were labelled "A3~" by Stiassny (1981) and Kaufman & Liem, 1982). The myology of the
A3a? by Bellwood & Choat (1990). Winterbottom (1974) pharyngeal apparatus of Searus has been described
considered them to be a posterior extension of the Aw. by Liem & Greenwood (1981), Clements & Bellwood
The posterior portion of the Aw, the Awa, is not (1988) and in detail by Gobalet (1989). The pharyngeal
present. The anterior portions Aw~ and Awy are both myology of Calotomus has been described by Yamaoka
well developed and distinct. In the Awy, in addition to (1980).
the usual insertion site on the tip of the articular medial The pharyngeal myology of the Scaridae differs from
spine, some fibres may insert on the medial face of the the labrid condition primarily in:
articular, dorsal to the insertion of the A3t. There is no 1. The origin of the levator posterior, which is
AwE. restricted dorsally by the posteriorly expanded
Summary of derived characters of jaw muscles: exoccipital (126.1). There is no origin from the
insertion of Al moved from the premaxillary process of supraoccipital crest. In Odax, Bodianus and Pseudodax

A3

A3
--1-+--11- A 1alA2
in A3t1r---v--.,.d~

in A 1alA2t2

in A3t2

bi in A 1alA2t2

A 1alA2t1 A3

Fig. 25. Myology of the oral jaws: A - Hipposcarus longiceps, integument and infraorbital bones removed,
scale bar equals 20 mm; B-bii, Scarus frenatus: B - integument and infraorbital bones removed, scale bar
equals 20 mm; bi - details of upper jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 10 mm; bii -
details of lower jaw, medial view, anterior to right, scale bar equals 10 mm.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 39

the onglll of the levator posterior includes the Viscera (characters 130 - 132)
supraoccipital crest. In other labrids the origin may not
extend this far dorsally, but it is not restricted by the Fig. 26
exoccipital (ef Yamaoka, 1978). Contrary to Yamaoka
(1980), the condition in Calotomus is not regarded as The viscera include the liver, intestine, and swim
an origin from the supraoccipital crest. In Calotomus, bladder. The structure of the former two organs have
the muscle arises from flanges on the exoccipital, been described in detail by Gohar & Latif (1959, 1961)
epioccipital and possibly part of the supraoccipital, but (in Searus and Hipposearus). Brief descriptions of
not from the supraoccipital crest per se as in some labrids the intestine are provided by Suyehiro (1942) (in
(Yamaoka, 1978) and Odax (Clements & Bellwood, Calotomus), AI Hussaini (1945, 1947) (in Chlorurus and
1988). Cetosearus), and Clements & Bellwood (1988) (in
2. The presence of a pharyngeal valve (78.1). Ail Searus). Visceral characters have not been used
scarid genera possess an unusual pharyngeal valve. previously in systematic studies of the Scaridae or
This has been described in Hipposearus and Searus Labridae.
(Gohar & Latif, 1959; Gobalet, 1989), Chlorurus (as The liver has two major lobes, a small dextral
Searus; AI Hussaini, 1945) and Sparisoma (Board, (right) lobe and a greatly enlarged sinistral (left) lobe.
1956), and is present in Nieholsina (Gobalet, 1989), The liver of scarids is large and oily (AI Hussaini, 1945,
Cryptotomus, Calotomus, Leptosearus, Cetosearus and 1947; Gohar & Latif, 1959). It typically has a yellow-
Bolbometopon (personal observation). Such a structure tan colour, in contrast to the deep red of most labrids.
is lacking in labrids, and appears to be a unique In scarids, the liver size and colour vary greatly within
feature of the Scaridae. Detailed analyses of the and between species (1.5 - 7.4% of total body weight;
pharyngeal valve and the associated osteology and Gohar & Latif, 1959). Scarids lack the fat bodies which
myology will probably reveal a suite of unusual are characteristic of other reef herbivores, which are
morphological characters associated with the presence represented either by distinct fat bodies, as in the
of this structure (see the description of the branchial Acanthuridae (Fishelson et aI., 1985, 1987), or as
arches; character 78). deposits around the intestines, as in some members of
3. The form of the transversus dorsalis posterior. In the Siganidae and Pomacanthidae (Bellwood, 1986). The
most labrids and odacids, the transversus dorsalis unusually large oily liver in scarids suggests that this
posterior crosses the midline (Liem & Greenwood, 1981, organ may serve as the primary lipid storage site. It is
Liem & Sanderson, 1986). In scarids, the transversus interesting to note that scarids lack the characteristic
dorsalis posterior does not cross the midline (Liem & oily bones found in all other labroid groups (ef character
Greenwood, 1981; Gobalet, 1989; personal observation). 115). These differences suggest that the Scaridae may
In both scarids and Pseudodax, it connects the have a novel form of lipid metabolism.
posterior portion of the lateral surface of the upper The intestines of scarids differ markedly from the
pharyngeal bone to the posterodorsal margin of the typical labrid pattern. As in labrids, all scarids lack a
condylar region of the fourth epibranchial (and is gastric stomach. However, unlike labrids, some scarid
thus, technically, an obliquus dorsalis IV). This genera possess a lateral intestinal bulb (132.1), ie, a
division was recorded only in scarids and the blind sac-shaped bulb on the dorsal/sinistral surface of
monotypic labrid genus Pseudodax and is considered the duodenum immediately behind the oesophageal/
derived (127.1). It appears to be functionally
related to the elongation of the upper pharyngeal
bones. ~ ,,"a. '""
Ligaments (characters 128, 129)
i\:;,~ ooiZ~
sac il duo/il jn an int bulb liv
The loss, in some scarid genera, of a post-
pharyngeal ligament connecting the lower pharyngeal B ~~I b
~- ~--~-~
jaw and the cleithrum (128.1) is regarded as a derived
condition. This ligament is present in some labrids ~ '--~->
C C duo/il jn
(Yamaoka, 1978; personal observation), the odacid Odax -~ Type 11
pullus (Clements & Bellwood, 1988) and several scarid
genera. D~~ ~~~
In many labrid genera, there is a broad thin ligament -~ Typelll d~_ _ __

~~~~->
connecting the dorsal part of the lateral face of the
maxilla (arising from a small cleft) to the suspensorium
in the region of the palatine-entopterygoid-pterygoid
junction (Stiassny, 1980, in Lauder & Liem, 1983; Fig. 26. Viscera and gut coiling patterns in the Scaridae: A-
personal observation). The loss of this ligament in all D - lateral view; a-d - dorsal view. See text for explanations
scarid genera appears to be a synapomorphy of the of coiling types; figures A-a, based on a Type II coiling pattern
Scaridae (129.1). in Searus frenatus.
40 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

duodenal junction. In some species, a small reproductive mode and egg shape. The reproductive
additional bulb may be present dextrally. The duodenum mode of scarids is predominantly protogynous
is a straight smooth tube which extends to the back hermaphroditism. This has been determined based on
of the body cavity, where it joins the ilial section of gonad examination in Cryptotomus (Robertson &
the intestine. The ilium of some scarids is unique Warner, 1978), Calotomus (Robertson et al., 1982),
among fishes, with the ilial wall constricted at short Sparisoma (Robertson & Warner, 1978), Bolbometopon
intervals, forming irregular internally imperfect pouches (Bruce, 1979; Randall & Bruce, 1983), Chlorurus (as
(131.1). Overall, the ilium has a sacculated appearance Searus; Choat & Robertson, 1975), Hipposearus
which closely resembles that of the mammalian (Choat & Robertson, 1975; Bruce, 1979; Randall &
colon. The extent of sacculation varies between Bruce, 1983) and numerous Searus species (Choat &
genera. The intestine may be either a simple tube, a Robertson, 1975; Bruce, 1979; Robertson & Warner,
tube with slight constrictions, or fully sacculated. 1978).
Bellwood (1986) suggested that the degree of There is no published evidence of hermaphroditism
sacculation may be correlated with the amount of in Nieholsina or Cetosearus, however, in Cetosearus at
carbonate ingested. There is a distinct rectum marked least, the presence of small female IPs and only large
by a constriction at the ilio-rectal valve. The rectum is TP males (Randall & Bruce, 1983; Choat & Randall,
not sacculated. 1986) strongly suggest that the single species in this
The coiling of the intestine in scarids is distinctive genus is also a protogynous hermaphrodite.
and usually follows one of three basic patterns (Fig. 26). Protogynous hermaphroditism is the common
The simple coiling pattern, Type I (130.1), has no pattern in the Labridae (Warner & Robertson, 1978;
sinistral loops. Additional sinistral loops are only Robertson & Choat, 1974) and represents the
found in Type 11 and Type III patterns (130.2). Type plesiomorphic condition within the Scaridae. The only
III differs from Type 11 in that the smaller sinistral variant to the common pattern of protogynous
loop (finely stippled in Fig. 26) lies lateral to the hermaphroditism is Leptosearus, the sole species of
larger sinistral loop. In Type 11, the smaller loop lies which, based on gonad examinations, appears to be
within the larger loop. The length of the sinistral gonochoristic (134.1; Robertson et al., 1982).
loops varies widely, from a small loop (sometimes
All scarid species spawn pelagic eggs. The eggs of
with only the larger loop apparent) to both loops
Calotomus (Kamiya, 1925), Sparisoma (Wynn & Bardach,
extending to the posterior region of the abdominal
1960; Randall & Randall, 1963), Cetosearus (Colin &
cavity.
Bell, 1991), and Bolbometopon (R.W. Bruce, personal
A Type I pattern may be found in some labrid
communication) are spherical. As the eggs of labrids are
species (ef. Gohar & Latif, 1959) which approximates
invariably spherical (Leis & Rennis, 1983), this state is
the type B pattern of Mok (1980), who describes it as
considered to be plesiomorphic. In Chlorurus,
the dominant labroid intestinal pattern, although most
Hipposearus (Colin & Bell, 1991) and Searus, the eggs
labrids examined in the present study, including the
are distinctly spindle-shaped, about one third as
outgroups, had a type LA pattern sensu Mok (1980).
long as wide (Wynn & Bardach 1960; personal
Type LA is therefore considered plesiomorphic and
observation). This represents a uniquely derived
Type I derived. Type 11 and III intestinal coiling
feature (133.1).
patterns, as found in the Scaridae, do not correspond
with any of the patterns described by Mok (1980) in his
survey of actinopterygian intestinal patterns, and may Juvenile colour patterns (characters 135, 136)
represent unique coiling patterns.
During ontogeny, the intestinal pattern of
Chlorurus and Searus changes from linear to a single Adult colour patterns are of limited value in
left-hand loop (at or near notochord flexion; Leis & distinguishing supraspecific groups within the
Rennis, 1983). In post-settlement individuals, the loop Scaridae. Most species have highly variable and
expands and a second loop develops anteriorly, complex adult colour patterns. This intrageneric
passing down the right hand side of the peritoneal variability precludes their use in the analyses of generic
cavity. A Type I pattern is present at 11 mm SL. An relationships. However, the colour patterns of
anterior extension of the intestine which curves to the juveniles are relatively conservative and show little
left, results in a Type 11 or III pattern which is complete variation outside a limited range of colour patterns
at approximately 60 mm SL (Bellwood, 1986). The (Bellwood & Chmit, 1989). There are two striking
transformation series for character 130, therefore, is: exceptions: A) the large ocellus on the anterior
linear/single loop - Type I - Type 1I/l11. part of the dorsal fin found only in Cetosearus
(135.1) and B) the presence of a single line on the
body terminating with a single dark dot at the base
Reproductive system (characters 133, 134) of the caudal fin found only in juvenile
Hipposearus (136.1). Juvenile scarids are figured in
The reproductive patterns of scarids has been Smith (1959), Randall & Bruce (1983), Bruce &
described in the introduction. Two aspects of the Randall (1985), Bellwood (1989), Bellwood & Choat
reproductive system were used in the analyses: (1989).
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 41

External morphology (characters 137 - 143) species (Appendix I). This represents approximately
81 % and 79%, respectively, of the 80 extant scarid
External morphological features have been widely species recognised in this study (given in the revised
employed in the determination of supraspecific scarid classification of genera of Scaridae). These species
taxa (Smith, 1956, 1959; Schultz, 1958, 1969). However, included representatives of all genera and sub-genera
few appear to be of phylogenetic significance. Those of previous authors (Scaridea excepted). The species
characters which were variable, but displayed examined were classified into ten groups. Each group
consistent patterns within genera are outlined below. comprised those species for which the available
Meristic values are based on the values given in Smith character state distributions were either identical or
(1959), Schultz (1969), Randall (1983a), Randall & differed only marginally. For the characters used,
Bruce (1983), Masuda et al. (1984), Bruce & Randall variability within a species or species group was
(1985) and Choat & Randall (1986). minimal, occurring in only eight out of the possible
In overall shape, only Cryptotomus displays a labrid- 1430 ingroup character state designations (Table 2,
like appearance with a elongate body and distinctly Appendix IV). All groups corresponded with previously
pointed snout (143.1; Figs 21-25). Most scarids have a recognised genera. The species examined included the
relatively deep body and a sloping, blunt or rounded type species from each of these genera.
snout. The two extremes being Hipposcarus which has A number of recent studies have presented
an elongate snout and Bolbometopon which has an evidence which indicates that the Labridae, Odacidae and
almost vertical profile. Scaridae represent a monophyletic assemblage (Liem &
All scarids have large cycloid scales with 22 to 24 Greenwood, 1981; Stiassny & Jensen, 1987). If the
pored scales in the lateral line. In all the outgroups, the Scaridae represents a monophyletic group, then the
lateral line was continuous, whilst in scarids it is broken immediate sister group of the Scaridae must be contained
posteriorly by one or two scale rows (141.1). There are within the Labridae or Odacidae. However, despite the
one to four cheek scale rows (140.1-2) (numerous in most widespread suggestion that the Labridae is the closest
outgroup taxa), two rows on the interoperculum (with family to the Scaridae, the Labridae is almost certainly
the exception of one in Cetoscarus), and three to seven paraphyletic and intrarelationships within the group are
(usually 4 to 6) median predorsal scales (139.1; numerous currently unclear. The immediate sister group of the
in most outgroup taxa). Scaridae therefore, can not be determined with any
The branchiostegal membranes may be free (as in all certainty. The apparent paraphyletic nature of the
outgroups) or broadly attached to the isthmus, with Labridae prompted Russell (1988) in his analyses of
(142.1) or without (142.2) a free-fold membrane. Pseudolabrus and allied genera to select the
In scarids, the form of the nostrils is often distinct. Embiotocidae as a sister group to the Labridae sensu lato,
The anterior nostril is usually small with a fleshy rim, based on the proposed phylogeny of Kaufman & Liem
with or without a small fleshy flap posterodorsally (1982). In a re-analysis of labroid interrelationships
(without in outgroups). In some genera this flap extends however, Stiassny & Jensen (1987) suggest that the
over half way to, or beyond, the posterior nostril (138.1). Pomacentridae may be the sister-group of the Labridae
These flaps are usually simple but in Sparisoma they bear sensu lato (including Scaridae and Odacidae) but
multifid cirri (138.2). emphasised the tentative nature of hypotheses regarding
In most scarid genera and outgroups, the two nostrils labroid relationships.
are of comparable size and are widely spaced. In In a recent review of the Odacidae, Gomon & Paxton
Cetoscarus and Bolbometopon, however, the nostrils are (1985) presented evidence which suggests that the
in close proximity and the posterior nostril is more than Odacidae is monophyletic, but they did not discuss its
twice the area of the anterior nostril (137.1). relationships with other labroid groups other than to
refer to Gomon & Russell (1981, unpublished). Gomon
& Russell (unpublished, 1981), represents an oral paper
Phylogenetic Analyses presented at the International Conference on the
Systematics and Evolution of Indo-Pacific Fishes held
in Sydney, Australia, September 1981. At this meeting,
Methods they presented a proposed outline of interrelationships
among groups within the Labridae (sensu Kaufman &
The method of cladistic analysis involves three Liem, 1982) based on osteological evidence. In this
stages: selection of taxa and outgroups, the choice of scheme, it was suggested that the Odacidae and the
characters and their coding into character states, and monotypic genus Cheilio should be recognised as a
lastly the analysis of the data and the construction of tribe, the Odacini, within the Labridae. It was proposed
the cladogram. that the Scaridae along with the monotypic genus
Pseudodax be recognised as distinct line which, with the
Selection of taxa and outgroups. As described earlier, genus Lachnolaimus, forms the tribe Scarini; the tribes
the analyses in this study were based on the external Scarini and Hypsigenyini forming the subfamily Scarinae.
examination of 65 scarid species, with dissections and/ The similarity and inferred close relationship between
or examinations of osteological preparations of 63 the Scaridae and Pseudodax has been noted by other
42 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

workers (Kner, 1860; Kaufman & Liem, 1982). Gomon material was examined but was not required to resolve
(1979) argued that Pseudodax was the immediate sister character states, and was not included in the analyses.
group of the Scaridae based on their shared unique A list of outgroup material examined is given in
modification of the first haemal spine and unusual Appendix 11.
modifications of the pharyngeal apparatus.
Whilst Pseudodax may represent the immediate sister Character selection and coding. Particular attention
group of the Scaridae it is a highly modified monotypic was paid to the selection of characters to be used in the
genus. Selection of Pseudodax as the sole outgroup analyses. Characters were excluded if they exhibited a
could restrict the number of characters that can be clear functional correlation with other established
polarised and may lead to spurious character state characters (eg, the fossa on the premaxilla and the
polarities. To overcome this problem, a number of corresponding process on the maxilla). To minimise the
labrid genera, including Pseudodax, were selected as effects of functional or developmental interdependence
outgroups. of characters, characters were obtained from as wide a
The st:cOIHl uutgruup chosen was Bodianus, the range of structures ami functional systems as possible.
largest and most widespread genus in the tribe In cases where it follows a logical precedent that
Hypsigenyini. This tribe was proposed by Gomon & character 'A' must be present prior to character 'B', (if
Russell (1981, unpublished) as the sister group of the B inserts on A for example) then taxa lacking 'A' must
tribe Scarini which comprises the Scaridae, Pseudodax also lack 'B'. In such cases, the status of character B
and Lachnolaimus. in taxa which lack A are coded as '?' ie, all possible
In addition to Pseudodax and Bodianus, one genus states.
was selected from each of three tribes from the four In the analyses, all character states were based on the
remaining labrid tribes proposed by Gomon & Russell adult condition. However, the inevitable problem of
(1981, unpublished): Labrus from the Labrini, Odax heterochrony was apparent. Where possible, especially
from the Odacini, and Pseudolabrus from the lulidini. in large species, both adult and juvenile specimens were
The above three outgroup genera were selected to examined to ensure that character states were not
include a broad range of labrid types. These particular directly linked to size or developmental stage. Characters
genera were selected as: A) detailed published which were clearly linked to sexual status were not
descriptions of anatomical characters were available, B) included in the analyses, although it is recognised that
each had recently been reviewed and the phyletic such characters may be extremely useful for analyses at
status of the group and associated genera resolved the species level.
(Labrus excepted), and C) comparative material was The characters chosen for inclusion in the analyses
readily available. No taxa within the tribe Chelinini were those known or found to be of high taxonomic
fulfilled all these criteria and although chelinine material value. That is, characters with clearly defined character
was examined, it was not represented in the analyses. states, which were consistent within a species, relatively
The inclusion of several outgroups including those uniform within species groups, and useful for
groups reportedly close to the ingroup was necessary distinguishing such groups. The choice of characters and
i) because of poorly resolved outgroup associations and the identification of character states are described in
ii) to facilitate a robust ancestral state assessment. In the Comparative Morphology section and character
the analyses, a global parsimony criterion was used to analysis section below. In all cases, characters with
assess outgroup and ingroup relationships two or more clearly defined character states were
simultaneously following Maddison et al. (1984). preferred. In the analyses, characters which were
Analyses of several outgroups in this manner enabled invariant within the Scaridae but differed between
the character states for the 'outgroup node' to be outgroups were included to facilitate the determination
determined. This represents a hypothetical taxonomic of ingroup-outgroup associations and reliable ingroup
unit that is directly ancestral to the ingroup. character polarities. Character polarities were determined
The use of the global parsimony criterion alleviates by direct outgroup analyses based on a simultaneous
the problems faced when working with poorly resolved resolution of in- and out-groups, using a global
or highly derived outgroups, where the arbitrary choice parsimony criterion following Maddison et al. (1984).
of a particular outgroup may markedly affect ingroup If characters are only found in the ingroup, outgroup
polarities, as it allows the program (PADP) to select the comparisons are not possible. In such cases, character
'best', ie, most parsimonious, outgroup-ingroup polarity was determined during the global parsimony
relationship. It also acts as a type of 'test' of the procedure. The low number of such characters (10 out
proposed monophyly of the ingroup. of 143 characters) would have a minimal effect on the
Published descriptions of the following genera were ingroup cladogram.
used in the compilation of the outgroup data matrix:
Bodianus (Yamaoka, 1978; Gomon, 1979), Labrus ONTOGENY CRITERION. Insufficient data was
(Rognes, 1973; Stiassny & lensen, 1987), Odax (Gomon available to determine the polarity of most characters
& Paxton, 1985; Clements & Bellwood, 1988), Pseudodax based on the ontogeny criterion (see Wiley, 1981;
(Gomon, 1979), Pseudolabrus (Russell, 1988). Nelson, 1978). However, this rule was applied to resolve
Additionallabrid, cichlid, pomacentrid and embiotocid the transformation sequence of some multistate characters
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 43

(these characters are marked 0 in column 3 of Table used, permitting inclusion of several outgroups and
1, Appendix IV). The morphological changes during enabling the program to polarise the character states in
ontogeny from settlement to sexual maturity in two a manner ensuring global parsimony (Maddison et al.,
species in the genera Chlorurus and Searus are 1984; Swofford, 1985). Initial analyses with no specified
described briefly in Bellwood (1986). Additional outgroups confirmed the monophyly of the Scaridae.
observations were made during the present study. Default options of HOLD = 1 and ADDSEQ = CLOSEST
were used in the analyses.
CRITERION OF GEOLOGICAL PRECEDENCE. As part
of this study, fossil scarids and labrids were examined,
but these data were not used to determine character Results
states. This criterion was not used in the present study
on both theoretical and practical grounds. The criticisms
of the technique by Schaeffer et al. (1972) and Nelson The analyses produced two equally parsimonious
(1978) are accepted, whilst the paucity and nature of trees each 238 steps long with a consistency index of
scarid fossils (Bellwood & Schultz, 1991) makes fossils 0.697 (Fig. 27). The two trees differed only in the
and geological precedence a poor source of information arrangement of the three outgroups furthest from the
with which to determine character polarities in the ingroup. In both trees, the ingroup and the two closest
Scaridae. outgroups always formed a monophyletic assemblage
with identical topologies, branch lengths and character
Phylogenetic analyses. A total of 143 characters, state distributions. The cladogram of the ingroup (the
coded as 334 character states, were selected for Scaridae) is given in Figure 28. Analyses based on
inclusion in the analyses. A list of the characters and binary data only produced a single tree (topology as in
Tree 2, Fig. 27) with a consistency index of 0.680.
character states is given in Table 1 (Appendix IV). The
character numbers given in Table 1 (Appendix IV) are
used throughout the text and in the figure captions
pertaining to the cladograms presented in figures 27 Interpretation
and 28. Characters and their respective character states
were described in the previous section on the
comparative morphology of the Scaridae. This section will be presented in two parts. Firstly,
The complete matrix of character states used in the the distribution of character states on the cladogram will
analyses for the ten ingroup taxa and five outgroup be examined by considering each character in turn. This
taxa is given in Table 2 (Appendix IV). This table part of the analyses will address character polarity
includes autapomorphic character states. These decisions and will assess evidence of homoplasy as a
characters or character states (if terminal result of convergence, parallelism or reversal, in terms
autapomorphies in multistate characters) were removed of the hypothesised evolutionary sequence of character
prior to analysis to prevent an artificial increase in state changes. These changes are considered with respect
the consistency index of the cladogram, whilst to characters in other labroid taxa. Secondly, individual
providing no information on relationships. Where clades within the ingroup cladogram will be examined,
character states are polymorphic within a genus, the with an appraisal of the evidence supporting the
condition is coded as 'P' in Table 2 (Appendix IV), but monophyly of each clade. In this study the term
was coded as '?' in the analyses (ie, all possible states). 'monophyletic' is used following Hennig (1966), ie,
Multi-state characters were all specified as unordered referring to a group containing a single ancestral species
unless the probable transformation series could be and all descendant species or taxa, equivalent to
inferred based on ontogenetic evidence (marked 0 in 'holophyletic' (e! Ashlock, 1971, 1972).
column 3 of Table 3, Appendix IV). In addition to the
main analysis, the data set was analysed with all Character analysis. In the analyses, character states
unordered characters removed (characters 6 and 30 were are considered unique if they were not recorded
retained as removal of the terminal autapomorphic state elsewhere in the in the Labroidei. This includes the
resulted in a binary character). All characters were outgroup taxa examined, additional material examined
unweighted. and published descriptions of additional labrid taxa,
The phylogenetic analyses followed the cladistic including members of the Cichlidae, Embiotocidae and
method of Hennig (1966), using the principle of Pomacentridae. Character states were considered
maximum parsimony for inferring phylogenies. unreversed if the character was retained, even if it
Computational procedures were carried out using was subject to subsequent modification. In the
PAUP version 4.2.1 (Phylogenetic Analysis Using analyses, the use of several outgroups prevents the
Parsimony; Swofford, 1985). application of the DELTRANS option which maximises
In all analyses the branch and bound option (BAND B) the occurrence of parallel events rather than
was used, an exact algorithm which guarantees to find reversals. In instances where the former may be
the shortest (most parsimonious) tree or trees. To root preferred, the alternative interpretations are noted. The
the ingroup tree the ROOT = OUTGROUP option was consistency (c) of each character (calculated after the
44 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

exclusion of terminal autapomorphies) is given in the fused condition occurs in clade 20, with separation
parentheses after the name of the character. again in Scarus.
4. Reticulate ethmoid. Autapomorphy of
NEUROCRANIUM. 1. Ethmoid-vomerine process (c Bolbometopon.
0.500). The cladogram indicates that an elongate 5. Maxillary facets on vomer (c = 1.000). The
ethmoid-vomerine process arose independently in cladogram indicates that anterodorsolaterally oriented
Hipposcarus and as a synapomorphy of clade 16. facets on the vomer represent the plesiomorphic
2. Ethmoid-frontal depression (c = 0.500). The loss condition. A shift to a lateral or dorsolateral orientation
of the ethmoid-frontal depression is a synapomorphy of is a synapomorphy of clade 20.
clade 20, with a reversal in Scarus. The loss appears 6. Supraoccipital crest (c = 1.000). In labrids and
to be associated with an overall structural strengthening other labroid taxa, the supraoccipital crest is a simple
of the neurocranium, which may be related to the crest with a smooth margin. The lateral flanges on the
power of the bite (cf. Bellwood & Choat, 1990). posterodorsal margin of the supraoccipital crest of
3. Ethmoid-frontal fusion (c = 0.333). The cladogram scarids appear to be a unique, unreversed
indicates that fusion of the ethmoid-frontals is the synapomorphy of the Scaridae, with the highly extended
plesiomorphic condition with separation representing a flanges of Calotomus (state 2) being a secondary
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). A reversal to modification.

SCARIDAE

Tree 2

Fig. 27. Cladograms showing the relationship of the Scaridae with the outgroup taxa. Both trees have a
length of 238 steps and a consistency index of 0.697. Clades are numbered arbitrarily following the
analyses. Character state distributions are as follows (character numbers and character states (in
parentheses) follow Table 3; synapomorphies which are unique and unreversed are in bold). Clade 25: 29(1),
40(2), 59(1), 64(1), 69(2), 73(3), 74(1), 81(3), 91(1), 92(1), 127(1). Clade 26: 19(1), 57(1), 71(1), 90(1),
104(1), 105(1).
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 45

7. Exoccipital flange (c = 1.000). A shortening of pair of fossae (state 2) is a synapomorphy of clade 18.
the posterior exoccipital flange, which terminates before 10. Size of pharyngeal articulation facets (c = 1.000).
the exoccipital condyle is a synapomorphy of clade 17. The possession of elongate pharyngeal articulation
8. Posterior extension of epioccipital (c = 1.000). The facets (length greater than 2.5 width), is a unique,
presence of a posterior extension (flange) of the unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
epioccipital which forms an arch-like site of origin for 11. Shape of pharyngeal articulation facets (c =
the levator posterior is a unique, unreversed 1.000). Facets which taper to a point anteriorly are a
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). Within the synapomorphy of clade 18. This condition is found in
Scaridae a short posterior extension (state 1) some labrids and cichlids.
represents the plesiomorphic condition, with a long 12. Curvature of pharyngeal articulation facets (c =
extension being derived (state 2). An anterodorsal 1.000). Strongly concave articulation facets on either
curving of the extension and a close association with side of a sharp medial ridge represent a unique,
the lateral processes of the supraoccipital crest is an unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
autapomorphy of Calotomus (state 3).
9. Deep subtemporal fossae (c = 1.000). The possession MANDIBULAR ARCH - PREMAXILLA. 13. Coalescence
of deep subtemporal fossae, which forms the site of of jaw teeth (c = 0.500). Coalescence of the teeth,
origin for the 4th levator externus muscles, is a unique, representing the apomorphic state, is found in Odax and
unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). in clade 21. This is regarded as homoplasy. Despite a
The cladogram indicates that the loss of the posterior superficial similarity, the nature of the coalesced teeth

t::
Cl Cl)

~
e: QI
~
Cl)

i:QI QI
e:Cl
Cl)

i:QI ...§- Cl)

i:
~
.2 .5 e: t)
t)
Q)
e:Cl i: Cl) Cl)

.2 .!!!
Cl .2
Cl)
.2 .~ Cl) i:! Cl
~ i:QI
..[Link] .2 :5lCl oS! .S:
~
oS! go QI t)

~ ~ ~ ~ CXl t5 :t Cl)
(.)
""

CLADE 18

Fig. 28. Cladogram of genera within the Scaridae. Clades are numbered arbitrarily for reference following
the analyses. Character state distributions are as follows (character numbers and character states (in parentheses)
follow Table 3; synapomorphies which are unique and unreversed are in bold; terminal autapomorphic character
states are underlined). Clade 24: the Scaridae, 3(1), 6(1), 8(1), 9(1), 10(1), 12(1), 15(1), 17(1), 21(1), 24(1),
30(1), 33(1), 34(1), 38(1), 55(1), 56(1), 58(1), 60(1), 62(1), 63(1), 67(2), 69(1), 70(1), 71(2), 73(1), 77(1),
78(1), 79(1), 81(1), 88(1), 89(1), 90(2), 96(1), 97(1), 98(0), 99(1), 100(1), 102(1), 103(1), 105(2), 107(1),
108(1), 111(1), 112(2), 113(1), 114(1), 115(1), 126(1), 129(1), 130(1), 139(1), 140(1), 141(1), 142(1).
Cryptotomus: 19(0),95(1). Clade 23: 51(1), 67(1), 76(1), 93(1), 143(1). Nieholsina: No synapomorphies. Clade
22: 8(2), 15(2), 37(1), 52(1), 63(2), 85(1), 87(1), 138(1), 142(2). Calotomus: @, .fu1)., 25(1), 26(1), 35(1),
95(1), 109(1). Clade 21: 13(1), 14(1), 19(3), 22(1), 38(0), 124(1). Leptosearus: 27(1), 30(2), 33(3), 87(0),
102(2), 134(1). Clade 20: 2(1), 3(0), 5(1), 16(1), 20(1), 23(1), 28(1), 39(1), 45(1), 55(0), 69(2), 72(1), 73(2),
75(1), 79(2), 80(1), 81(2), 83(1), 84(1), 88(2), 120(2), 122(1), 128(0), 130(2), 131(1), 132(1). Sparisoma:
22(0), 31(1), 32(1), 44(1), 108(0), 120(1), 125(1), 138(2). Clade 19: 21(2), 34(2), 35(1), 43(1), 47(1), 49(1),
50(1), 95(1), 97(0), 101(2), 109(1), 112(1), 116(1), 140(2), 142(0). Clade 16: 1(1), 17(0), 19(2), 36(1), 41(1),
99(2), 110(1), 137(1). Cetosearus: 34(1), 95(0), 135(1). Bolbometopon: 1ill, 00), 54(1), 101(1), 110(2).
Clade 18: 9(2), 11(1), 42(1), 45(2), 46(1), 65(1), 66(1), 67(2), 68(1), 72(2), 73(3), 74(2), 81(3), 82(1), 92(2),
94(1), 98(1), 106(1), 118(1), 119(1), 124(2), 133(1), 138(0). Chlorurus: 40(3), 48(1), 63(3), 123(1). Clade
17: 7(1), 22(0), 23(0), 30(0), 33(2), 35(2), 39(2), 49(0), 50(0), 52(0), 70(2), 88(0), 117(1), 120(1), 121(1),
122(0). Hipposearus: 1(1), 53(1), 85(2), 86(1), 98(0), 106(0), 118(0), 124(1), 136(1). Searus: 2(0), 3(1), 15(0),
34(0), 40(1), 110(1), 120(0).
46 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

differs markedly. In od acids, the teeth are small and any associated tooth ridges lie medial to the teeth on
coalescence is primarily a result of fusion by the cement the dentary. This condition is classified as being an
covering. In the scarids, the teeth are much larger and underslung dentary (state 1) which is exemplified by
form a clear coalesced beak with or without a cement Sparisoma which lacks the anterior caniniform teeth.
covering. An overshot premaxilla (state 2) is a synapomorphy of
14. Cutting edge (c = 0.500). The cladogram suggests clade 19 and independently derived in Odax. The
that the presence of a single entire cutting edge has arisen division between over slung (state 2) versus
independently in Odax and clade 21. underslung (state 1) was regarded by Schultz (1958,
15. Maxillary fossa (c = 0.500). Absent in all 1969) as a key character in the division of the Scaridae
outgroups studied, the presence of this fossa appears to into two subfamilies, the Sparisomatinae (underslung)
be a synapomorphy of the Scaridae. The cladogram and the Scarinae (overslung). Whilst this subfamilial
indicates a change from the indistinct condition (state division is not supported by other characters, the nature
1) to a relatively robust form (state 2) in clade 22. This of jaw overlap does appear to be of phylogenetic
parallels the ontogenetic sequence described in significance.
Chlorurus (Bellwood, 1986). The fossa is lost in Scarus. 22. Lateral depression in the premaxillary ascending
16. Conical/caniniform teeth anteriorly (c = 0.500). process (c = 0.333). A lateral depression in the
The cladogram indicates that the presence of anterior ascending process of the premaxilla marking the
canines is the plesiomorphic condition with an position of the palatine dorsal process appears to have
independent loss in Pseudodax and clade 20. The loss arisen in clade 21, with a subsequent reversal in
in Pseudodax is a result of flattening of the anterior teeth Sparisoma and clade 17.
which are broad and incisiform. In clade 20 the teeth 23. Concave rostra I cartilage site (c = 0.500). A
are lost or fused to form a dental plate. concavity in the posteroventral extremity of the
17. Lateral canines (c = 0.500). In some labrid genera ascending process, marking the location of the rostral
a ventrolaterally oriented canine is present at the angle cartilage is a synapomorphy uniting clade 20, with a
of the jaws (eg, Halichoeres, Bodianus, Stethojulis). reversal in clade 17.
However, the orientation of these teeth is markedly 24. Alveolar process (c = 1.000). A distal bifurcation
different from the large recurved lateral canines of of the alveolar process of the premaxilla is an unreversed
scarids. The cladogram suggests that the presence of synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
lateral canines is a synapomorphy uniting the 25. Conical teeth medial to cutting edge (c = 1.000).
Scaridae, with a reversal to the plesiomorphic condition The cladogram suggests that the presence of conical
in clade 16. teeth medial to the cutting edge is an autapomorphy of
18. Nodules on teeth. An autapomorphy of Calotomus. The presence of comparable teeth in
Bolbometopon, which has distinct nodules at the base Nicholsina precludes this however, the teeth may have
of each tooth. Small, indistinct nodules are visible in different origins. In Nicholsina, they form a single row
large Scarus guacamaia and S. coelestinus, but were not anteriorly, whilst in Calotomus they are represented by
recorded in other Scarus species. a more diffuse patch of teeth posteriorly. More detailed
19. Cement (c = 0.600). Cement (dermadentine) may analyses of the development of teeth in the oral jaws
be present either as a thin layer at the base of teeth of scarids is required.
(state 1), in a thin layer at the base of the dental 26. Conical teeth on the ventral surface near the
plates (state 2) or thick layer covering the dental plates medial symphysis. Autapomorphy of Calotomus.
(state 3). The cladogram suggests that a thick cement 27. Origin of teeth in lateral tooth rows. A medial
layer is a synapomorphy of clade 21, with a reduction origin of teeth in the lateral tooth rows is an
in the extent of the cement being a synapomorphy of autapomorphy of Leptoscarus. In all other genera, the
clade 16. The absence of cement in Cryptotomus is origin is lateral.
considered to be a secondary loss. It is not considered 28. Developing tooth rows (c = 1.000). The presence
to be the result of heterochrony as cement is clearly of large teeth in distinct diagonal or vertical tooth
visible in specimens of a comparable size in other taxa. rows is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of clade 20.
20. Tooth rows (c = 1.000). The presence of six or 29. Maxillary facet (c = 1.000). In the plesiomorphic
more distinct diagonal or vertical tooth rows is a unique condition, the maxillary facet of the premaxilla lies on
unreversed synapomorphy of clade 20. the ventral surface of the premaxillary ascending
21. Jaw overlap (c = 0.667). The cladogram indicates process. A move to the base of the ascending process,
that the labroid condition with no distinct overlap and at the angle of the ascending and alveolar processes is
interdigitating teeth is the plesiomorphic condition. a synapomorphy of clade 25.
The condition in Pseudodax is considered to be a 30. Facet on distal end of alveolar process (c =
modified labroid condition with no distinct overlap, 0.500). The presence of a facet is a synapomorphy of
with interdigitation of the teeth being prevented by the Scaridae (clade 24). The facet is often faint in
their great lateral flattening. In Cryptotomus, Chlorurus, and is lost in clade 17. A convex facet (state
Nicholsina, Calotomus and Leptoscarus the anterior 2) is an autapomorphy of Leptoscarus.
caniniform teeth overlap the teeth in the dentary 31. Articulation facet of palatine-maxilla extending
although the remainder of the alveolar process and onto premaxilla. Autapomorphy of Sparisoma.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 47

MAXILLA. 32. Grooved anterior process on of simple oblique ridges which interdigitate at the
maxillary arm. Autapomorphy of Sparisoma. symphysis. The cladogram suggests that this
33. Facet of palatine articulation (c = 1.000). The represents the plesiomorphic condition (state 1), with
presence of a distinct concave maxillary facet (state 1) irregular ridges (state 2) a synapomorphy of clade 25
at the articulation point of the maxillary-palatine is a (lost in Pseudodax). The presence of straight ridges
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). A convex with a distinct zig-zag posteriorly (state 3) is an
facet (state 3) is a unique autapomorphy of autapomorphy of Chlorurus (this pattern is distinct in
Leptoscarus, whilst a modified facet with a ventral all species with the exception of C. perspicillatus
groove (state 2) is a unique unreversed synapomorphy where only a single inflection is visible). A reversal to
of clade 17. the plesiomorphic state (state 1) is recorded in Scarus
34. Premaxillary facet (c = 0.500). The presence of (a slight hint of an inflection may be seen in
a premaxillary facet is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae exceptionally large individuals).
(clade 24). The cladogram suggests that a facet on the 41. Medial suture location (c = 1.000). In the
medial face of the medial process (state 1) arose first, plesiomorphic condition, the medial sutures extend to the
with a subsequent movement to an anterior position edge of the dentary. An anterior foreshortening is a
(state 2) in clade 19, with a reversal to the unique, unreversed synapomorphy of clade 16.
plesiomorphic condition in Scarus, and from state 2 to 42. Articular fossa (c = 1.000). A deep rounded
1 in Cetoscarus. articular fossa is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of
35. Anterior maxillary-premaxillary ligament clade 18. This reflects the presence of an articulating
insertion (c = 0.667). In the plesiomorphic condition, the articular-dentary joint in the three taxa in clade 18:
maxillary insertion site is indistinct or marked by a Chlorurus, Hipposcarus and Scarus.
shallow narrow groove. A relatively deep groove/hole 43. Coronoid process (c = 1.000). A greatly enlarged,
(state 1) arose independently in Calotomus and clade 19. deep coronoid process is a unique unreversed
Subsequent modification in clade 17 resulted in an synapomorphy of clade 19.
insertion site marked by a shallow concavity (state 2). 44. Notch in posterior margin of coronoid process.
36. Medial ridge for Al insertion (c = 1.000). The Autapomorphy of Sparisoma.
presence of a stout ridge on the medial face of the
maxilla terminating in the insertion scar of the Alt, is ARTICULAR. 45. Anterior articular ascending
a unique unreversed synapomorphy of clade 16. process (c = 1.000). The cladogram indicates that a broad
anterior ascending process is a unique unreversed
DENTARY. 37. Number of diagonal tooth rows (c synapomorphy of clade 20. Within the clade, the
= 1.000). The cladogram indicates that within the possession of a slight terminal notch (state 1) is the
Scaridae the plesiomorphic condition is five or less more plesiomorphic state, with a rounded end (state 2)
diagonal tooth rows. The presence of six or more being a synapomorphy of clade 18.
diagonal tooth rows (usually 6 to 10) is a synapomorphy 46. Posterior ascending process (c = 1.000). A loss
uniting clade 22. In the analyses, Scarus is coded '1', of the posterior ascending process is a unique
as although most rows are vertical, a diagonal unreversed synapomorphy of clade 18.
component may be seen during ontogeny and in the 47. Articular medial spine (c = 1.000). The presence
adult stages of some species. In all such cases at of an articular medial spine is a unique unreversed
least six rows were indicated. Calotomus is coded 'P' synapomorphy of clade 19.
as most species have three to six rows (exceptionally up
to 8). PALATINE ARCH. 48. Entopterygoid lateral process.
38. Bone ridge inside cutting edge (c = 0.500). An Autapomorphy of Chlorurus.
anterior extension of the dorsal margin of the coronoid 49. Latticework of holes in entopterygoid (c = 0.500).
process is present as a bony ridge which passes medial The presence of holes is a synapomorphy of clade 19
to the posterior region of the cutting edge in with a reversal in clade 17.
Cryptotomus, Nicholsina and Calotomus. This is 50. Palatine dorsal process (c = 0.500). A short
interpreted as a synapomorphy of clade 24 with a palatine dorsal process is a synapomorphy of clade 19
reversal in clade 21. with a reversal in clade 17.
39. Tooth row orientation (c = 1.000). The cladogram 51. Condyle on palatine (c = 1.000). A distinct
indicates that in the Scaridae oblique tooth rows are the maxillary condyle on the palatine dorsal process is an
plesiomorphic condition (state 1) with a mosaic unreversed synapomorphy of clade 23. Although not
composed of both diagonal and vertical components (state found in the outgroup taxa examined, a condyle is
2) being a synapomorphy of clade 20. A pattern occasionally visible in other labrid taxa.
dominated by vertical rows (state 3) is a synapomorphy 52. Direction of maxillary condyle (c = 0.500). The
of clade 17. cladogram indicates that an anteroventrally facing
40. Medial suture form (c = 0.500). The presence of condyle is plesiomorphic (state 0). A shift to a ventral!
medial sutures appears to be correlated with bite posteroventral orientation (state 1) is a synapomorphy of
strength, and may be found in many labroid taxa. When clade 22, and is followed by a reversal to the
present, the sutures are usually represented by a series plesiomorphic condition in clade 17.
48 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

53. Facet on medial face of palatine (c = 0.500). A condition is marginal III Pseudodax but clear III all
flat facet on the medial face of the palatine dorsal scarids.
process appears to have arisen independently in Odax
and Hipposcarus (see notes in Comparative BRANCHIAL ARCHES. 65. Number of gill rakers (c =
Morphology section). 1.000). Gill raker counts vary widely both within and
54. Reticulate bone on palatine dorsal process. between species (Munro, 1967; Choat & Randall, 1986;
Autapomorphy of Bolbometopon. A distinct reticulate Randall, 1983a). However, some divisions are apparent;
matrix of bone on the dorsal surface of the palatine a count of 35 or greater is an unreversed synapomorphy
dorsal surface was only found in Bolbometopon. The of clade 18.
slight reticulation in some Calotomus species was not 66. Form of posterior gill rakers (c = 1.000). The
considered to be homologous. presence of simple (unbranched) gill rakers is an
55. Entopterygoid (c = 0.500). An elongate unreversed synapomorphy of clade 18.
entopterygoid that extends onto the posterodorsal
margin of the palatine is a synapomorphy of the BRANCHIAL ARCHES - DORSAL ELEMENTS. 67. Form
Scaridae (clade 24) with a reversal in clade 20. of neurocrania I facets (c = 0.667). An anteroposterior
56. Palatine-entopterygoid joint (c = 1.000). A curvature of the neurocranial facets is pronounced in
strong ankylosed fusion of the palatine and entopterygoid the outgroup taxa and represents the plesiomorphic
is an unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade condition. In most scarids a slight curvature is retained
24). (state 1), with straight facets (state 2) arising
independently in Cryptotomus and clade 18.
HYOID ARCH. 57. Ceratohyal-epihyal joint (c = 1.000). 68. Alveolar process (c = 1.000). A distinct
The loss of distinct suturing of the ceratohyal-epihyal anterodorsal projection of the alveolar process
joint is a synapomorphy of clade 26. represents a synapomorphy of clade 18.
58. Trace of beryciform foramen (c = 1.000). 69. Width/Height (c = 0.667). The cladogram indicates
Although the presence of a beryciform foramen is that broad upper pharyngeals (WIH greater than 2.0) are
regarded as a plesiomorphic condition in percoid fishes plesiomorphic. A reduction in width (WIH 1-1.9; state
(Gomon, 1979), the cladogram indicates that the presence 1) is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24) with
of traces of the beryciform foramen represent a a marked further reduction uniting clade 20 (WIH less
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). than 0.8; state 2). This condition appears to have arisen
59. Ventral hypohyal (c = 1.000). An elongate ventral independently in Pseudodax.
hypohyal is a synapomorphy of clade 25. 70. Number of tooth rows (c = 1.000). Absent in all
60. Number of branchiostegal rays (c = 0.333). The outgroup taxa examined, the presence of regular tooth
number of branchiostegal rays is of limited value as a rows is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of the
phylogenetic character as a result of variability in the Scaridae (clade 24). Within the family, three rows (state
outgroups. Gomon (1979) and Russell (1988) suggest 1) is the plesiomorphic condition. A loss of the outer
that the general perciform number is 6-7; Russel row (state 2) is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of
regarded 5 as a derived condition in Notolabrus. clade 17. In some adult Scarus species both outer rows
Although the cladogram suggests that five rays is a may be lost. The transformation series 3-2-1 is supported
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24), the Scaridae by ontogenetic evidence. Several taxa show a
appears to be merely one of a number of labroid groups progressive reduction in size and occasional loss of the
possessing five rays (cf. Gomon, 1979). outer row during ontogeny (Bellwood, 1986).
61. Urohyal (c = 0.500). An elongate urohyal is a 71. Tooth replacement pattern (c = 1.000). The
synapomorphy of clade 27, with a reversal in Pseudodax. addition of cardinal teeth at the posterior margin or in
62. Urohyal anterodorsal process (c = 1.000). The fields within the dentigerous area represents the
presence of a narrow anterodorsal process which lacks plesiomorphic condition (state 0), and was found in all
anteroposterior flanges, is a unique unreversed the outgroup taxa examined (including Pomacentridae,
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). Embiotocidae, Cichlidae and most labrids). Phyllodont
63. Urohyal ventral aspect (c = 1.000). The cladogram development (state 1; described by Bellwood, 1990) was
indicates that a narrow ventral process which tapers only recorded in Bodianus and other hypsigenyine
posteriorly to a point is the plesiomorphic condition genera (including the oblique phyllodont development
(state 0). Lateral wings which flare posteriorly (state 4) of Pseudodax). A conveyor-like progression (state 2) is
are found only in Odax (flared wings and a low lateral a unique, unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae
profile are a unique feature of odacids; Gomon & (clade 24). This condition is interpreted as a highly
Paxton, 1985). A spatulate ventral aspect (state 1) is a modified type of phyllodont development where
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24) and a narrow development has a dominant linear component with
ventral aspect (state 2) a synapomorphy of clade 22. A numerous functional teeth (see section on Comparative
posterior expansion (state 3) is an autapomorphy of Morphology).
Chlorurus. 72. Tooth sizes (c = 1.000). The cladogram indicates
64. Urohyal posterior margin (c = 1.000). A deeply that within the Scaridae near equal tooth sizes in each
notched urohyal is a synapomorphy of clade 25. This row is the plesiomorphic condition. A reduction in the
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 49

size of teeth in row 3 (state 1: row 3 less than half row of 11 or more tooth rows is a synapomorphy of clade
2, row 1 and 2 subequal) is a synapomorphy of clade 20.
20, with a further reduction of both outer rows (state 81. Shape of dentigerous area (c = 0.750). The
2: row 3 less than half row 2 and row 2 less than half cladogram suggests that following the appearance of a
row 1) a synapomorphy of clade 18. In the analyses broad rectangular dentigerous area in the Scaridae
these character states were ordered based on the (clade 24) there has been a progressive increase in the
ontogenetic sequences observed in Chlorurus and relative length of the dentigerous area, from a length/
Scarus (Bellwood, 1986). width ratio of less than 0.7 (state 1) in clade 24, to 0.7
73. Dentigerous area (c = 0.750). The cladogram to 1.3 (state 2) in clade 20 and greater than 1.5 (state
suggests that the dentigerous area becomes 3) in clade 18. This latter condition appears to have
progressively more elongate within the Scaridae. Most arisen independently in Pseudodax.
outgroup taxa have a broad dentigerous area (length/ 82. Tooth shape when worn (c = 1.000). The presence
total width of both bones less than 0.6). An increase to of worn teeth which result in ovoid enamel ridges is a
0.6 to 0.9 (state 1) is a synapomorphy of clade 24, unique unreversed synapomorphy of clade 18.
with a further elongation to 1.0 to 2.0 (state 2) a 83. Raised sides on dentigerous area (c = 0.500). This
synapomorphy of clade 20. The most elongate condition has arisen independently in some odacids,
condition with the length more than 2.1 times the width Pseudodax and clade 20, and appears to be a result of
(state 3) is a synapomorphy of clade 18. This condition convergence. In Pseudodax the raised sides are
appears to have arisen independently in Pseudodax. represented by an unusual series of incisiform teeth on
74. Shape of medial tooth (c = 1.000). The possession a bone ridge around the anterior and anterolateral
of a broad, laterally expanded tooth (state 1) is a margins and a series of phyllodont teeth posteriorly. In
synapomorphy of clade 25. A modified tooth which is scarids the ridge appears to be primarily the result of
curved, narrowing medially, with all the teeth in the differential wearing, which is highest medially and
opposing medial rows of each upper pharyngeal bone lowest along the lateral margins.
strongly interdigitating (state 2) is a unique unreversed 84. Lateral horn muscle insertion scars (c = 1.000).
synapomorphy of clade 18. Character states were coded A medial insertion scar (primarily of the 4th levator
as ordered following changes observed in ontogenetic externus and levator posterior) which is larger than the
sequences (Bellwood, 1986). lateral insertion scar (primarily of the 5th adductor)
75. Medial margins of dentigerous areas (c = 0.500). represents a synapomorphy of clade 20. The exact
A parallel orientation of the medial margins of the location and size of the insertion scars are not visible
upper pharyngeal dentigerous areas has arisen in Cryptotomus, Nicholsina and the outgroup taxa
independently in Pseudodax and clade 20. examined.
76. Horn on posterior margin of upper pharyngeal 85. Ridge separating insertion scars (c = 1.000). In
(c = 1.000). The cladogram suggests that the presence the plesiomorphic condition there is no ridge visible. A
of a distinct horn as found in Pseudodax and distinct straight ridge (state 1) is a unique unreversed
Cryptotomus is the plesiomorphic condition (state 0), synapomorphy of clade 22, with a curved ridge (state
with a reduction (state 1) uniting clade 23. Outgroup 2) an autapomorphy of Hipposcarus.
taxa were coded as ' ?' as the presence or absence of 86. Lateral projection of the pharyngocleithral
a horn could not be determined with confidence in condyle. A lateral protrusion of the pharyngocleithral
taxa with short broad upper pharyngeal bones. condyle beyond the insertion scars on the lateral horn
77. Epibranchial 4 (c = 1.000). A greatly expanded is an autapomorphy of Hipposcarus.
lateral flange on the fourth epibranchial is a unique 87. Lateral horn shaft (c = 0.500). A flattened shaft
unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). which is broader than deep is a synapomorphy of clade
78. Pharyngeal valve (c = 1.000). The presence of 22, with a reversal in Leptoscarus.
a pharyngeal valve is a unique unreversed 88. Location of keel base (c = 0.667). In the
synapomorphy of the Scaridae. plesiomorphic condition the keel arises anterior to the
bar which crosses between the two lateral horns
BRANCHIAL ARCHES VENTRAL ELEMENTS. (state 0). The cladogram suggests that a movement of
79. Number of teeth per row (c = 1.000). The presence the keel base to the posterior edge of the crossbar
of teeth in even rows across the lower pharyngeal is (state 1) is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24),
a unique unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae with subsequent movement to the middle of the
(clade 24), with six teeth being the more plesiomorphic crossbar (state 2) a synapomorphy of clade 20. A
condition (state 1). The subsequent reduction to five reversal to the plesiomorphic condition is found in
teeth per row (state 2) is a synapomorphy of clade 20. clade 17.
In Hipposcarus longipinnis rows may alternate 89. Keel form (c = 1.000). An elongate keel which
regularly between five and six teeth but in the type is deep, rounded and flattened distally is a unique
species H. harid five teeth are typical. The condition in unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
H. longiceps is regarded as a modification of the 5 90. Tooth development (c = 1.000). Developmental
condition. patterns are complex. In the cladogram, the simple
80. Number of tooth rows (c = 1.000). The presence labroid pattern is plesiomorphic, with phyllodont
50 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

development (state 1) representing a derived feature of 101. Precaudal vertebrae (c = 0.600). Variability in
Bodianus and Pseudodax (the tooth development the number of precaudal vertebrae in the outgroups
patterns of Pseudodax are complex but include makes polarity decisions difficult. However, the cladogram
phyllodont series; coded as state 1). Sequential suggests that an increase to ten to 11 (state 2) is a
eruption of several teeth in a transverse row (state 2) synapomorphy of clade 19, with 12 (state 1) independently
is a uniqueunreversedsynapOmorphyoftheScaridae derived· in Pseudodax and Bolbometopon:
(clade 24). 102. Expanded postzygopophyses (c = 1.000). A
91. Ridge on keel (c = 1.000). The presence of a stout marked posterolateral expansion of the haemal
ridge along the anterior edge of the keel represents the postzygopophyses on the first two vertebrae (state 1)
plesiomorphic condition. The absence of a distinct ridge is a unique, unreversed synapomorphy of the
is a synapomorphy of clade 25. Scaridae (clade 24), the flattening of the protrusion on
92. Keel margin (c = 1.000). The plesiomorphic the second vertebra (state 2) is a autapomorphy of
condition is represented by a simple even narrow margin. Leptoscarus.
The presence of a pair of lateral flanges ventrally is a 103. Expanded flanges on parapophyses (c = 1.000).
synapomorphy of clade 25. The presence of a flange Expanded flanges on the parapophyses of the anterior
which extends along the margin is a synapomorphy of three to five vertebrae are a unique unreversed
clade 18. synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
104. Form of the first haemal spine (c = 1.000). The
PECTORAL GIRDLE. 93. Articular facet on cleithrum presence of a relatively thin curved first haemal spine
(c = 1.000). The presence of a distinct round facet of that arises from a distinct secondary haemal arch which
the pharyngocleithral joint on the cleithrum is a spans across the haemapophyses of the first caudal
synapomorphy of clade 23. vertebra, appears to be a synapomorphy uniting the
94. Medial indentation of cleithrum (c = 1.000). An Scaridae and the hypsigenyine labrids (sensu Gomon,
indentation immediately beneath the pharyngocleithral 1979).
articulation facet is a unique unreversed synapomorphy In other labrids the first haemal spine is usually
of clade 18. formed by an extension of the haemapophyses which
95. Holes above cleithral facet (c = 0.250). A lattice- join ventrally resulting in a secondary haemal arch. The
work series of holes above the pharyngocleithral size of this arch varies greatly, and in some species, may
articulation facet appears to have arisen independently be absent (Russell, 1988). In species where remnants of
in Cryptotomus, Calotomus and clade 19, with a reversal the parapophyses remain, the haemal spine is bifid
in Cetoscarus. proximally (as in Notolabrus; Russell, 1988) arising
96. Posterior flange on posttemporal (c = 1.000). A laterally from the medial surface of the parapophyses,
long posterior extension of the posttemporal which rather than from the middle of a bridge joining die
extends along the dorsal margin of the supracleithrum parapophyses as in hypsigenyines and scarids. The only
is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae possible reversal is the straightening of the spine in
(clade 24). Cetoscarus.
97. Pectoral rays (c = 0.500). The cladogram indicates 105. Number of vertebrae (c = 0.667). Variability in
that a decrease in the modal number of pectoral rays the outgroups make character polarity difficult. The
to 13 or less is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade cladogram indicates that the possession of 25
24). This reduction is reversed in clade 19 with a return vertebrae is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
to the plesiomorphic condition of 14 or more rays. However, this number is found in many labroid
groups, and may be the plesiomorphic condition within
PELVIC GIRDLE. 98. Horns on symphysis of the Labroidei.
basipterygum (c = 0.250). It is difficult to determine the
polarity of this character. Distinct posterior extensions DORSAL FIN. 106. Number of predorsal bones (c =
or horns on the symphysis of the basipterygum appear 0.333). The plesiomorphic condition is one predorsal.
in several labrid genera including Chelinus, Bodianus Stiassny & Jensen (1987) suggest that the reduction of
and Pseudodax. The cladogram suggests that the the number of predorsal bones from the general
presence of horns is a synapomorphy of clade 18 with percoid condition of three (Smith & Bailey, 1961;
a reversal (loss) in Hipposcarus. Johnson, 1984) to two in the Labridae and two or fewer
99. Basipterygum anterior extremities (c = 1.000). The in the Cichlidae represents a synapomorphy uniting
presence of lateral flanges (state 1) is a unique these two groups. Whilst it is accepted that a
unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). In reduction may represent the derived condition, in this
clade 16 these flanges are reduced and the extremities study all labrids examined had only one predorsal bone
are broadly rounded (state 2). (see also Gomon, 1979; Russell, 1988). In the analyses,
the loss of the predorsal bone in odacids, Chlorurus and
AxIAL SKELETON. 100. First neural spine (c = 0.500). Scarus are interpreted as an independent loss in Odax
The cladogram suggests that fusion of the first neural and clade 18, with a reversal in Hipposcarus. However
spine to the centrum arose independently in Odax and the alternative interpretation of independent loss in
the Scaridae (clade 24). Chlorurus and Scarus may be preferred.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 51

107. Neural spines before first dorsal pterygiophore mandibulae muscle section 1 (Alt) onto the premaxillary
(c = 1.000). A reduction to one, from the plesiomorphic process of the maxilla, as found in most labrids,
condition of two, appears to be a unique unreversed represents the plesiomorphic condition. Stiassny (1981)
synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). considered it a synapomorphy of the Labridae although
108. Dorsal spines (c = 0.333). Soft dorsal spines are this was later refuted by Stiassny & Jensen (1987). A
a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). A reversal movement of the Alt insertion to the base of the
to the plesiomorphic condition, ie, with pungent spines premaxillary process appears to have arisen
is found in Sparisoma and in Calotomus zonarchus independently in Odax and clade 19. This condition is
(Bruce & Randall, 1985). similar to that in several other labroid groups (ct
109. Dorsal fin membrane (c = 0.333). A continuous Stiassny & Jensen, 1987).
(as opposed to deeply incised) dorsal fin margin 117. Fusion ofA1 and A2 (c = 1.000). A synapomorphy
appears to have arisen independently in Calotomus and of clade 17.
clade 19. 118. Presence of an A1f3 (c = 0.333). The analyses
suggest that the presence of an A1f3 is a synapomorphy
ANAL FIN. 110. Pterygiophores before first haemal of clade 18 with a reversal in Hipposcarus. The
spine (c = 0.333). The cladogram suggests that in the alternative interpretation of an independent origin in
plesiomorphic condition one to two pterygiophores are Chlorurus and Scarus is equally parsimonious and may
present before the first haemal spine, with three be preferred.
pyerygiophores arising independently in Odax, clade 16 119. A2 insertion (c = 1.000). The cladogram indicates
and Scarus, with a subsequent change to four being an that an insertion restricted to the dentary is a unique
autapomorphy of Bolbometopon. unreversed synapomorphy of clade 18.
120. A3 insertion (c = 0.500). In the plesiomorphic
CAUDAL SKELETON. 111. Parhypural length (c = condition the A3 inserts on the articular. The cladogram
1.000). A foreshortened parhypural is a unique suggests that the loss of the articular insertion (state 2)
unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). is a synapomorphy of clade 20, with a shift to include
112. Anterior protrusion on hypurals 1/2 (c = 1.000). the dentary (state 1) being independently derived in
A distinct protrusion which fully or partially closes the Sparisoma and clade 17. This is followed by a loss of
gap between hypurals 1+2 and the haemal spine of the the dentary insertion in Scarus which again displays
penultimate vertebra (state 1) is a synapomorphy of the the plesiomorphic condition. However, it must be noted
Scaridae (c1ade 24). A marked reduction of the that, because of the changes in the mechanics of the
protrusion (state 2) is a synapomorphy of clade 19. A lower jaw, the functional role of the A3 in Scarus may
small protrusion is present in some Bodianus differ markedly from that of the A3 in the outgroups.
specimens. 121. A3 size (c = 0.500). A great reduction in the
113. Neural flange on penultimate vertebra (c = relative size of section A3 is a synapomorphy of clade
0.500). Although outgroup variability makes character 17.
polarity difficult, a short neural protrusion without a 122. Degree of fibre pinnation (c = 0.500). The
distinct flange appears to be a synapomorphy of the presence of strongly pinnate fibres in the adductor
Scaridae (clade 24). Both large and reduced states are muscles is a synapomorphy of clade 20. This condition
found in a range of other outgroup taxa, although a IS reversed in clade 17.
reduction does appear to be the derived condition (ct 123. AWE. An autapomorphy of Chlorurus
Stiassny & Jensen, 1987). 124. Posterior section of Aw (Awa) (c = 0.400). A
114. Principal caudal rays (c = 1.000). A reduction simple labrid-like tendinous posterior connection to
to 7+6 principal rays (ie, rays supported by the the quadrate is the plesiomorphic condition. A posterior
hypurals and parhypural; as opposed to 7+7, 8+7 or 8+8 expansion of muscle fibres to form a distinct muscular
in labrids, Leis & Rennis, 1983; Russell, 1988) is a bundle (state 1) is a synapomorphy of clade 21. The
synapomorphy of the Scaridae. analyses suggest that the complete loss of the posterior
connection (state 2) is a synapomorphy of clade 18, with
LIPID IN BONES. 115. Bone colour (c = 1.000). When a reversal in Hipposcarus. However, the alternative
prepared by controlled maceration in boiling water or interpretation of an independent loss in Chlorurus and
in beetle cultures, the bones of all outgroups examined Scarus may be preferred.
contained lipid which turns brown within weeks of 125. Awo. Autapomorphy of Sparisoma.
preparation (oxidisation?). Although there was no
Cryptotomus material available prepared in this manner, PHARYNGEAL ApPARATUS. 126. Origin levator
the lack of lipid in the bones of all other scarid posterior (c = 1.000). A site of origin of the levator
genera, as evidenced by pure white bones (target bone posterior which is restricted posteriorly to the
= maxilla), suggests that this condition is a unique epioccipital region, with no extension to the
unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24). supraoccipital crest, is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae
(clade 24). It must be noted, however, that there is
MYOLOGY - ORAL JAWS. 116. A1 insertion (c = considerable variability within the Labridae (Yamaoka
0.500). An insertion of the tendon of the adductor 1978), and that the scarid pattern is not unique.
 52 Records of the A)lstralian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

127. Transversus posterior dorsalis (c = 1.000). In autapomorphy of Hipposcarus.

most labrids, as in the Odacidae, Cichlidae,
Embiotocidae and Pomacentridae, the transversus EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY. 137. Posterior nostrils (c =
posterior dorsalis crosses the midline posterior to the 1.000). A posterior nostril more than twice the size of
upper pharyngeal bones (c! Liem & Greenwood, 1981; the anterior nostril (with the nostrils separated by a
Kaufman & Liem, 1982). In Pseudodax and all scarids, small gap) is a unique unreversed synapomorphy of
the transversus posterior dorsalis does not cross the clade 16.
midline. This modification is regarded as a unique 138. Fleshy flap on anterior nostril (c = 0.500). In
unreversed synapomorphy uniting clade 25. te plesiomorphic condition the flap is either absent or
simple and less than half the distance to the
LIGAMENTS. 128. Post pharyngeal ligament (c = posterior nostril. An elongate flap almost touching
0.500). The loss of the postpharyngeal ligament is a or extending beyond the posterior nostril (state 1) is a
synapomorphy of clade 20. Although inconsistency in synapomorphy of clade 22, with a reversal to the
the outgroup makes polarity decisions difficult, the plesiomorphic condition in clade 18. A long branched
presence of a postpharyngeal ligament in several flap (state 2) is an autapomorphy of Sparisoma.
labroid groups (Yamaoka, 1978) supports the polarity 139. Median predorsal scales (c = 1.000). A reduction
decision in the analyses. in the number of median predorsal scales to seven or
129. Maxillary-Palatine ligament (c = 1.000). A thin less is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24).
ligament connecting the lateral face of the maxilla to 140. Cheek scale rows (c = 1.000). The plesiomorphic
the suspensorium, near to the palatine-entopterygoid condition is represented by numerous rows of small
junction (a modified primordial ligament?) is present in scales. The presence of a single row of five to seven
the Labridae, Embiotocidae, Cichlidae and large scales (state 1) is a synapomorphy of the Scaridae
Pomacentridae (Anker, 1987; Stiassny & Jensen, 1987). (clade 24), the presence of two to four rows of large
The loss of this ligament is an unreversed synapomorphy scales is a synapomorphy of clade 19.
of the Scaridae. 141. Lateral line (c = 1.000). In the cladogram, the
plesiomorphic condition is represented by a continuous
VISCERA. 130. Intestinal coiling pattern (c = 1.000).
lateral line, with an interruption of one/two scale row( s)
The presence of a distinct dextral loop (state 1; Type representing a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade
I) is a unreversed synapomorphy of the Scaridae and 24). However, it must be noted that several labrid taxa
is probably unique (c! Mok, 1980). A modified pattern also have an interrupted lateral line (Webb, 1990).
with an additional pair of short anterior loops extending 142. Gill membranes (c = 0.667). In the plesiomorphic
along the left side (state 2; Type I1+III) is a unique condition the gill membranes are not attached to the
unreversed synapomorphy of clade 20. Considerable isthmus and form a deep free fold posteriorly. A broad
individual variability is observed, with ontogenetic attachment to the isthmus with no free fold (state 1) is
changes from Type I to 11 or Ill. Characters are coded a synapomorphy of the Scaridae (clade 24), whilst a
based on the modal pattern of large mature specimens. broad attachment with a free fold (state 2) is a
In the analyses, character states were coded as synapomorphy of clade 22. In clade 19 there is a
ordered based on observations on the ontogenetic reversal to the plesiomorphic condition.
development of gut coiling patterns in Chlorurus and 143. Head profile (c = 1.000). A sloping or rounded
Searus (Bcllwood, 1986). profile is a synapomorphy of clade 23.
131. Sacculation of the intestine (c = 1.000).
Sacculation of the intestine is a unique unreversed
synapomorphy of clade 20. The slight invaginations or
Clade Analysis
creases occasionally found in the intestines of
Calotomus and Leptoscarus do not represent sacs.
These intestines, therefore, are not considered to be In the following section, the clades that comprise
sacculated. the cladogram given in Figure 28 and their respective
132. Lateral intestinal bulb (c = 1.000). The presence synapomorphies are discussed. Each clade is numbered
of a lateral bulb is a unique unreversed synapomorphy as in Figure 28, this is followed by its name or
of clade 20. included taxa, and by a list of its synapomorphies,
giving the character number (following Table 1,
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM. 133. Egg shape (c = 1.000). Appendix IV) and character state in parentheses.
A spindle-shaped egg appears to be a unique Synapomorphies which are unique and unreversed are
unreversed synapomorphy of clade 18. listed in bold. Character states are considered unique
134. Gonochorism. Autapomorphy of Leptoscarus. if they are not recorded elsewhere in the Labroidei
(sensu Kaufman & Liem, 1982). Unreversed characters
JUVENILE COLOUR PATTERNS. 135. Dorsal fin with are only referred to in clades with two or more taxa.
distinct anterior ocellus. An ocellus in the dorsal fin of Terminal autapomorphic character states are underlined.
the juvenile is an autapomorphy of Cetoscarus. The correspondence between the cladogram and the
136. Juvenile with single body stripe. A single body formal classification of the family is addressed in the
stripe terminating in a dark dot posteriorly is an following discussion.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 53

Clade 24. The Scaridae [3(1), 6(1), 8(1), 9(1), 10(1), is a reversal (38) and one is a loss (124). Another
12(1), 15(1), 17(1), 21(1), 24(1), 30(1), 33(1), 34(1), weakness appears to be the affinities of Leptosearus.
38(1), 55(1), 56(1), 58(1), 60(1), 62(1), 63(1), 67(2), Whilst Leptosearus may share character states with the
69(1), 70(1), 71(2), 73(1), 77(1), 78(1), 79(1), 81(1), other members of clade 21 the exact nature of these
88(1), 89(1), 90(2), 96(1), 97(1), 98(0), 99(1), 100(1), character states often differs and homology may be
102(1), 103(1), 105(2), 107(1), 108(1), 111(1), 112(2), questioned (particularly the oral jaw characters: 14, 19,
113(1), 114(1), 115(1), 126(1), 129(1), 130(1), 139(1), 22). The monophyly of the other genera within the clade
140(1), 141(1), 142(1)]. The family is defined by 54 is strongly supported (clade 20), with the cladogram
synapomorphies, of which 19 are unique and suggesting that Leptosearus is the sister-group.
unreversed. These latter characters are related to the Leptosearus appears to be an anomalous monotypic
structure of the pharyngeal apparatus (8, 9, 10, 12, 70, genus with only loose affinities to the other taxa in
71, 77, 78, 79, 89, 102, 103), the dorsal fin (107), the clade 20.
caudal skeleton (111), the neurocranium (6), the urohyal
(62), the posttemporal (96), the basipterygum (99) and Leptosearus [27(1). 30(2). 33(3), 87(0), 102(2), 134(1)].
the intestinal coiling pattern (130). Although dominated This is an unusual monotypic genus which is clearly
by pharyngeal characters there is a wide range of defined by five distinct autapomorphies. Its affinity to
characters from other functional systems. The pharyngeal other taxa, however, is unclear as noted above.
characters include associated articulation sites on the
neurocranium and insertion sites of pharyngeal muscles Clade 20. Sparisoma, Cetosearus, Bolbometopon,
on the neurocranium and vertebral column. Chlorurus, Hipposearus, Searus [2(1), 3(0), 5(1), 16(1),
20(1), 23(1), 28(1), 39(1), 45(1), 55(0), 69(2), 72(1),
Cryptotomus [19(0), 95(1)]. Both synapomorphies are 73(2), 75(1), 79(2), 80(1), 81(2), 83(1), 84(1), 88(2),
weak, 19(0) appears to be a reversal whilst 95(1) appears 120(2), 122(1), 128(0), 130(2), 131(1), 132(1)]. This is
to have been independently derived in Cryptotomus, a clearly defined clade with six unique unreversed
Calotomus and clade 19. synapomorphies associated with the oral jaws (20, 28,
45) and intestine (130, 131, 132). In addition, the
Clade 23. Nieholsina, Calotomus, Leptosearus, monophyly of this clade is supported by 20 other
Sparisoma, Cetosearus, Bolbometopon, Chlorurus, synapomorphies with characters from the neurocranium
Hipposearus, Searus [51(1), 67(1), 76(1), 93(1), 143(1)]. (2, 3, 5), oral jaws (16, 23, 39), palatine arch (55),
The five synapomorphies uniting this clade are relatively pharyngeal apparatus (69, 72, 73, 75, 79, 80, 81, 83,
weak with no unique character states. 84, 88), myology (120, 122) and ligaments (128). The
number and nature of the synapomorphies defining this
Nieholsina There are no synapomorphies defining this clade suggest that clade 20 represents a distinct
taxon. Further analyses are required to determine the phyletic lineage, characterised by significant changes in
phyletic status of this genus. a number of functional systems, which in turn may
reflect a major ecological shift in the biology of the
Clade 22. Calotomus, Leptosearus, Sparisoma, component taxa.
Cetosearus, Bolbometopon, Chlorurus, Hipposearus,
Searus [8(2), 15(2), 37(1), 52(1), 63(2), 85(1), 87(1), Sparisoma [22(0), 31(1), 32(1), 44(1), 108(0), 120(1),
138(1), 142(2)]. The monophyly of this clade is 125(1), 138(2)]. A distinctive genus clearly defined by
supported by nine synapomorphies including one five autapomorphies based on characters from the oral
unique unreversed synapomorphy: a ridge separating jaws (31, 32, 44), myology (125) and external morphology
insertion scars on the lateral horn of the lower (138). The presence of the adductor mandibulae
pharyngeal bone [85(1)]. These synapomorphies include subsection Aw (125) is a particularly unusual feature and
pharyngeal (8, 85, 87), oral jaw (15, 37), urohyal (63) has not been recorded previously in the Teleostei (ef
and external (138, 142) characters. Winterbottom, 1974).

Calotomus [6(2), 8(3), 25(1), 26(1), 35(1), 95(1), Clade 19. Cetosearus, Bolbometopon, Chlorurus,
109(1)]. This genus is clearly defined by three Hipposearus, Searus [21(2), 34(2), 35(1), 43(1), 47(1),
autapomorphic character states, two of the neurocranium 49(1),50(1), 95(1),97(0), 101(2), 109(1), 112(1), 116(1),
(6, 8) and one in the oral jaws (26). The four remaining 140(2), 142(0)]. This is a well-defined clade with two
synapomorphies are weak. All the synapomorphic unique unreversed synapomorphies: the presence of a
character states appear to have arisen independently in deep coronoid process (43) and an articular spine (47).
other scarid taxa. The 13 other synapomorphies are based on characters
of the oral jaws (21, 34, 35), palatine arch (49, 50),
Clade 21. Leptosearus, Sparisoma, Cetosearus, pectoral girdle (95, 97), axial skeleton (101), dorsal fin
Bolbometopon, Chlorurus, Hipposearus, Searus [13(1), (109), caudal skeleton (112), oral jaw myology (116), and
14(1), 19(3), 22(1), 38(0), 124(1)]. This is a relatively external morphology (140, 142).
weakly defined clade. Of the six synapomorphies, not one
is unique, two are subsequently reversed (19, 22), one Clade 16. Cetosearus, Bolbometopon [1(1), 17(0),
54 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

19(2), 36(1), 41(1), 99(2), 110(1), 137(1)]. This is a characters of ancestral forms by adults of their
small but well-defined clade comprising two monotypic descendants).
genera. There are three unique unreversed
synapomorphies: insertion of Al on raised ridge (36), Hipposearus [1(1), 53(1), 85(2), 86(1), 98(0), 106(0),
a foreshortening of the dentary medial sutures (41), and 118(0), 124(1), 136(1)]. Hipposearus is marked by a
a large posterior nostril (137). Of the five remaining number of characters interpreted in the cladogram as
synapomorphies, four are unreversed within the clade (1, reversals of character states which were synapomorphic
17, 19, 99). in clade 18 (ie, characters 98, 106, 118, and 124).
However, the alternative interpretation of parallel
Cetosearus [34(1), 95(0), 135(1)]. This monotypic changes in Chlorurus and Searus is noted, and may be
genus is defined by one autapomorphy (135) based on preferred.
the juvenile colour pattern.
Searus [2(0), 3(1), 15(0),34(0),40(1), 110(1), 120(0)].
Bolbometopon [±CD, 18(1), 54(1), 101(1), 110(2)]. Most of the character states synapomorphic for Searus
This distinctive monotypic genus is defined by four are reversals of states which are synapomorphic in
autapomorphies based on characters from the clades 24 (15, 34, 40) and 20 (2, 3, 120). The
neurocranium (4), oral jaws (18), palatine arch (54) and paedomorphic trend seen in clade 17 is continued in
anal fin (110). Searus with further evidence of paedomorphosis, the state
of characters 15, 34, 40 in Searus being characteristic
Clade 18. Chlorurus, Hipposearus, Searus [9(2), of juvenile specimens of other scarid taxa.
11(1), 42(1), 45(2), 46(1), 65(1), 66(1), 67(2), 68(1),
72(2), 73(3), 74(2), 81(3), 82(1), 92(2), 94(1), 98(1),
106(1), 118(1), 119(1), 124(2), 133(1), 138(0)]. This is Discussion
a well-defined clade with eight unique unreversed
synapomorphies. These are associated with the oral
jaws (42, 46), pharyngeal apparatus (74, 82), pectoral Relationships of the Scaridae with other labroid
girdle (94), oral jaw myology (119) and reproductive taxa. The findings of this study overwhelmingly support
system (133). Perhaps the most significant feature of the monophyly of the Scaridae. There is little doubt
this clade is the presence of a unique second that the Scaridae represents a distinct natural group
articulation in the lower jaw, between the articular and (defined by 54 synapomorphies, 19 of which are unique
dentary (42). This represents a major morphological and unreversed). Their relationships with other labroid
innovation with no comparison within the Labroidei. The taxa, however, remain unclear. Nevertheless two points
monophyly of this clade is supported by a further 15 may be made.
synapomorphies. Firstly, the analyses support the widespread
suggestion that Pseudodax is closely related to the
Chlorurus [40(3), 48(1), 63(3), 123(1)]. A distinctive Scaridae. Furthermore the cladogram is consistent with
genus defined by four autapomorphies based on the suggestion of Gomon (1979) that the Scaridae,
characters from the oral jaws (40), palatine arch (48), Pseudodax and other hypsigenyine genera form a
urohyal (63) and myology (123). The presence of an monophyletic assemblage, with the component taxa
adductor mandibulae subsection Aw (123) is particularly sharing a modified first haemal spine, phyllodont tooth
distinctive and has not been recorded previously in the development (ef Bellwood, 1990) and the loss of the
Teleostei (ef Winterbottom, 1974). hypurapophysis.
Secondly, there remains a striking degree of
Clade 17. Hipposearus, Searus [7(1), 22(0), 23(0), homoplasy between some scarids and odacids, raising the
30(0), 33(2), 35(2), 39(2), 49(0), 50(0), 52(0), 70(2), question of the nature of their evolution. The possibility
88(0), 117(1), 120(1), 121(1), 122(0)]. This is a clearly of convergence correlated with the functional constraints
defined clade, with three unique unreversed of a herbivorous diet and fused oral teeth may be
synapomorphies: a modified palatine articulation facet on worth investigating, despite marked differences in their
the maxilla (33), dental plates with dominant vertical feeding modes (ef Clements & Bellwood, 1988).
tooth rows (39) and the loss of the outer tooth row on
the upper pharyngeals (70). There are an 13 additional Phylogeny and classification of the Scaridae. The
synapomorphies which unite this clade. However, a large Scaridae has long been recognised as a distinctive and
proportion of these represent reversals of character clearly defined family of fishes, traditionally
states which are synapomorphies defining clades 19 (49, characterised by coalesced teeth in the oral jaws and a
50), 20 (23, 88, 122), 21 (22, 52) and 24 (30). Many highly modified pharyngeal apparatus (eg, Nelson, 1984;
of the character states displayed in clade 17 are Myers, 1991; Randall et aI., 1990). However, in a
comparable to those found in juveniles of other taxa in cladistic analysis few of the traditional characters would
the family (especially characters 30, 50, 52, 122). Clade support the monophyly of the family. Few, if any, are
17 appears to be distinguished, at least in part, by unique and many are not shared by all members of the
paedomorphic development (ie, the retention of juvenile family. Indeed, based on traditional characters it is
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 55

difficult to define the limits of the Scaridae. This has interrelationships. For now, the current familial divisions
led some authors to question the status of the family are retained in an endeavour to maintain taxonomic
(Kaufman & Liem, 1982). stability. It is nevertheless recognised that, in view of
The results of the present study strongly support the paraphyletic nature of the Labridae sensu stricto, an
the monophyly of the Scaridae but also indicate that appraisal of the higher classification of the labroid
the traditional characters are inadequate. The family fishes is urgently required and that a change in the
lacks diagnostic external characters. The study has taxonomic rank of the Scaridae may be warranted.
revealed a new suite of characters which provide Previous appraisals of the generic classification of
diagnostic features of the family (unique unreversed the Scaridae have likewise been severely hampered by
synapomorphies), only a small proportion of which the lack of suitable external characters. The number of
represent traditional characters. All are internal characters used in the present study and the nature of
characters and of these, the majority are osteological. their distribution has resulted in a well defined
The character states that define the family are drawn cladogram. Again, the analysis is dominated by internal
from a wide range of functional systems. This points to characters.
a major divergence from the labrid condition. It is also The cladogram presented in Figure 28, summarises
interesting to note that, as in other labroid taxa, the the relationships between species groups within the
pharyngeal apparatus possesses many characters Scaridae. Most of these groups correspond with existing
which are of phylogenetic significance. This structure genera. The data support the monophyly of Calotomus,
appears to have been intimately associated with the Leptoscarus, Sparisoma, Cetoscarus, Bolbometopon and
evolution of the Scaridae and its component taxa. Hipposearus. As in most cladograms, the basal taxa are
The only previous attempt at a cladistic analysis of relatively poorly defined, with few synapomorphies/
scarid taxa was by Bellwood (1986) who examined the autapomorphies. This is the case with Cryptotomus and
phylogeny of genera in the subfamily Scarinae (sensu Nicholsina, and more detailed investigations are
Schultz, 1958), using data which arose from functional required to further resolve their relationships. Only one
analyses of species of Chlorurus and Scarus (all genus, Searus, has been substantially modified from
previously placed in the genus Scarus). This study current usage. The genus Scarus sensu lato as currently
considered 60 characters and 13 scarid taxa but was used comprises two distinct phyletic lineages. In the
limited by the extent of missing data. Only 28 characters revised classification, the vast majority of the species
were employed in the analyses and in the construction remain in the genus Scarus sensu stricto, with the
of a cladogram. Despite the paucity of characters, these remaining species being placed in the genus Chlorurus.
initial observations cast doubt upon two established Unless the cladogram suggests otherwise, existing
taxonomic groups: the Sparisomatinae and the genus taxa have been retained in their current usage, to
Scarus. The validity of the two scarid subfamilies, the preserve taxonomic utility and nomenclatural stability.
Sparisomatinae and the Scarinae, was questioned and it Although a cladogram may be converted into a
was inferred that the Sparisomatinae was paraphyletic. hierarchical Linnaean classification, the results are almost
The need for more detailed observations on sparisomatine invariably unwieldy. I believe that the best means of
genera was emphasised. expressing relationships is by using a cladogram, where
The genus Scarus also appeared to be paraphyletic, taxonomic rank is of little significance. However,
and it was suggested that the genus was comprised of taxonomic ranks do help to classify forms into readily
two distinct phyletic lineages. These two groups were identifiable groups in practical applications. In this
identified as separate functional groups by Bellwood study, existing taxonomic groups and their ranks have
(1986) and, subsequently, by Bellwood & Choat (1990). been retained if the data support their monophyly.
This distinction also appeared to have a phylogenetic Groups which were clearly paraphyletic have not been
basis. retained. Where the monophyly of a group could not be
These observations are supported by the data in the established, but, if at the same time, no alternative
present study. These data indicate that the grouping was indicated by the data then the taxonomic
sparisomatine genera Cryptotomus, Nicholsina, status of that group has been retained and the need for
Calotomus, Leptoscarus and Sparisoma represent a further study noted. The revised generic classification
paraphyletic assemblage. A division of the family into of the Scaridae is given below. Details of this
two subfamilies is not supported by the data and is
Family Genus No. spp.
therefore rejected.
With regards to the familial status of the Scaridae, Scaridae Cryptotomus 1
the results do not change my position as outlined in the Nieholsina 2
introduction. That is, that fusion of the Labridae, Calotomus 5
Leptosearus 1
Scaridae and Odacidae into a single family is premature.
Sparisoma 8
Monophyly may be a prerequisite to the recognition of Cetosearus 1
the group as a family but it is not a justification. Bolbometopon 1
Consideration of the familial status of the Scaridae must Chlorurus 14
await a detailed study of all the labroid fishes (sensu Hipposearus 2
Greenwood et al., 1966) and a resolution of their Searus 45
56 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

classification, including taxonomic diagnoses, a key to subsequent fate of the isolated scarid populations
genera and a list of extant species are given in the being determined by habitat associations and the
revised classification of genera of Scaridae. patterns of habitat availability through time. These
events are summarised in Table 3 (Appendix IV). The
Fossil record and historical biogeography. The evidence which supports this series of events will be
construction of a cladogram of scarid genera provides discussed below in three sections: i) differentiation of
a basis for examining biogeographic patterns in the eastern and western populations prior to the closure of
Scaridae. By substituting areas for terminal taxa one is the eastern Tethys; ii) differential development of
able to construct a hypothesis of area relationships. Caribbean/Atlantic and Indo-Pacific populations; iii) the
The examination of such area cladograms (sensu pantropical distribution of Searus.
Humphreys & Parenti, 1986) enables one to evaluate the
role that vicariance, dispersal and differential speciation/ i) DIFFERENTIATION OF EASTERN AND WESTERN
extinction may have played in determining current POPULATIONS PRIOR TO THE CLOSURE OF THE
distribution patterns. An area cladogram for the Scaridae EASTERN TETHYS. Differentiation of eastern (Indian
is given in Figure 29. and Pacific Ocean) and western (Atlantic, Caribbean and
The two main patterns that can be identified from east Pacific) populations prior to the closure of the
the area cladogram are: 1) A distinct division between eastern Tethys is supported by two pieces of evidence.
Indo-Pacific and Atlantic genera. Seven of the ten A. The fossil record shows that at least one clearly
genera are present in only one of the two regions; 2) differentiated scarid genus was present in the Paratethys
Only three genera have representatives in both (southern Europe) at approximately the time of the
regions, and of these, only one genus, Searus, has a closure of the eastern Tethys.
pantropical distribution. This genus is one of the most B. There are no basal taxa present in both areas.
recent taxa, yet it is also the most abundant and The oldest recorded fossil scarid is a Calotomus
widespread. species (c. preisli) from the Mid-Miocene (14 Myr BP)
Any explanation of these patterns must account for of Europe (Bellwood & Schultz, 1991). This is the first
the marked difference between Atlantic/Caribbean and unequivocal fossil representative of the family and
Indo-Pacific faunas and the presence of the most derived clearly establishes the presence of scarids at
genus Searus in both provinces. approximately the time of the closure of the eastern
The major differences between the Indo-Pacific and Tethys (12-14 Myr BP; ef Ragl & Steininger, 1983),
the Caribbean scarid faunas are interpreted as a and in the key central region of the Tethys. This
consequence of early faunal differentiation and supports the contention that the basal taxa were
vicariance events, followed by major differences in the present at this time, that they had differentiated
history of reefs and other tropical marine habitats in sufficiently to be placed within groups based on Recent
the two regions during the succeeding 13 million years. taxa, and that scarids were present in the central Tethys
The available evidence suggests that there were two and were therefore likely to be influenced by the closure
major vicariance events in the historical biogeography of the eastern Tethys.
of the Scaridae: the closure of the eastern Tethys and The lack of any pantropical basal taxa suggests
the closure of the Isthmus of Panama, with the that the eastern and western areas were already

IP IP IP IP IP IP IP
EP EP EP
c C C C
EA EA EA

IP Indo-Pacific
EP Eastern Pacific
C Caribbean
EA Eastern Atlantic

Fig. 29. Area cladogram of scarids (based on the cladogram of genera of Scaridae given in Figure 28). A
and B indicate minimum ages of divergence based on fossil evidence. Details are provided in the text.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 57

distinct at this time, each with a clearly identifiable runoff) the fate of coral reefs in the Caribbean
scarid fauna: Cryptotomus, Nicholsina and Sparisoma especially during the Pleistocene glaciations was a
in the western (Atlantic) region; Calotomus, Leptoscarus, tenuous one (Newell, 1971; Frost, 1977). These factors
and the ancestor of clade 19 in the eastern (lndo-Pacific) point to a possible cessation of coral reef growth and
region. loss of shallow-water coral reefs over extensive areas.
The above hypothesis is proposed as the most However, other marine habitats may not have been
parsimonious explanation for present day distribution equally susceptible. Seagrasses, in particular, probably
patterns. The only alternative explanation would require fared better. Today, seagrasses are a dominant and
the complete and reciprocal loss of basal taxa in the widespread shallow water marine habitat in the
two regions (ie, the complete loss of any taxon in one Caribbean. They extend into temperate areas and thrive
region that remains in the other). in coastal areas with terrigenous runoff (cf Larkum &
Hartog, 1989). They also represent a key habitat for three
ii) DIFFERENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF CARIBBEAN/ of the four Caribbean scarid genera.
ATLANTIC AND INDO-PACIFIC POPULATIONS. During The role of seagrasses as refuges for reef taxa with
the 13 to 15 Myr following the closure of the eastern seagrass-dwelling representatives may have been
Tethys, the Caribbean/Atlantic/Eastern Pacific and critical during this period. The ability of seagrasses to
Indo-Pacific regions have had a distinctly different withstand low temperatures, and to survive in areas with
history, with periods of global sea level changes and a relatively high sediment load and nutrient input
other climatic factors markedly affecting tropical faunas. suggest that the effects of the Pleistocene glaciations on
This appears to have held true for the scarid Caribbean seagrass communities may have been much
populations as well. less than their impact on coral reefs.
As a significant shallow-water habitat, Caribbean
Eastern Province: Indian and Pacific Oceans. coral reefs may not have had the continuity of
Although the Indo-Pacific encountered numerous sea availability as seen in the Indo-Pacific. The role of
level changes throughout the late Neogene and seagrasses and other off-reef habitats as refuges for
especially in the Pleistocene it appears to have had reef fish taxa during the Pleistocene glaciations may
continuity of coral reef development. Thus, although on have been critical in the shaping of the present-day
a regional basis reefs may have disappeared, the Indo- Caribbean reef fish fauna. Indeed it may be that the
Pacific province as a whole probably retained modern Caribbean coral reef fish fauna is dominated by
considerable reef habitat (cf Newell, 1971; Rosen, 1988). taxa which were recently seagrass and rocky-reef
For reef fish taxa with a relatively long pelagic larval dwelling forms. This suggestion may, in part, explain
phase (30-50 days, Brothers, et aI., 1983) such regional why seagrasses in the Caribbean serve as initial habitats
losses would be of only minor significance and the for reef fishes at settlement to an extent that is not seen
province as a whole would have continuous availability in the Indo-Pacific (cf Shulman, 1985; Shulman &
of coral reef habitats. Ogden, 1987; Parrish, 1989).
The presence of a fossil fragment ascribed to the The Eastern Pacific seems to have suffered a similar
genus Bolbometopon in the Miocene of Sri Lanka fate to the Caribbean during the Pleistocene, but with
(Bellwood & Schultz, 1991) points to the presence of an even greater loss of corals (Heck & McCoy, 1978)
the more derived reef-associated scarid taxa in the Indian and lacking extensive seagrasses, it may have lost even
Ocean during this period. more scarid species. It is interesting to note that the only
It is suggested that it is the combination of a large scarid species with Caribbean affinities present in the
area and continuity of habitat availability that permitted Eastern Pacific is a rocky reef dwelling species,
the speciation and survival of reef associated scarid taxa Nicholsina denticulata.
in the Indo-Pacific.
iii) THE PANTROPICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SCAR US.
Western Province: Atlantic, Caribbean and eastern One of the most problematical aspects of the
Pacific. The history of the western province is in stark distribution patterns of scarid genera is the pantropical
contrast to that of the eastern (lndo-Pacific) province. presence of Scarus, which is in stark contrast to all
Although both provinces underwent periods of sea other scarid genera. The question arises of whether
level change their effects in the western province were Scarus was present in the Caribbean prior to the closure
much more severe and resulted in a considerable faunal eastern Tethys or if it appeared after, either arising in
loss. There is extensive evidence of regional extinctions the Caribbean or migrating in from the Indo-Pacific prior
in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific (Vermeij & Petuch, to the closure of the Isthmus of Panama.
1986) with reef corals being particularly susceptible to It is not possible, at this stage, to distinguish between
changes during the Pleistocene glaciations (Frost, 1977; these alternatives, however, the available evidence offers
Jackson et aI., 1985). some support for the suggestion that Scarus arose in the
Given widespread faunal losses, depletion of coral Indo-Pacific and has repeatedly crossed the eastern
taxa, marked sea level and surface temperature Pacific barrier, both before and after the formation of
changes, limited geographical extent and close proximity the Isthmus of Panama.
to major land masses (and concomitant freshwater Fossil evidence of the Scaridae from the Americas is
 58 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

equivocal as all records appear to be misidentifications, following the closure of the Isthmus of Panama.
most being oplegnathid material (Bellwood & Schultz, The advantage of the above explanation is that it is
1991; personal observation). based on a relatively robust cladogram, incorporating
Only two genera occur on both sides of the Isthmus taxa which have well documented distributions. In most
of Panama, Nieholsina and Searus. Nieholsina is cases the component hypotheses are refutable and
represented by two species, one in the Caribbean and therefore potentially testable. Most have a distinct time
Atlantic, the other in the eastern Pacific. As noted above, frame which makes them particularly amenable to
Nieholsina is one of the most basal taxa and has refutation or testing by further examination of the fossil
probably been represented in the western (Atlantic, record, comparisons with molecular data sets, and
Caribbean, east Pacific) province since at least the comparisons with cladograms from other taxa.
Mid-Miocene. The two species were presumably isolated The above hypotheses are specific. They refer only to
by the formation of the Isthmus of Panama, which is the biogeography of the Scaridae. Whether the patterns
a widely recognised vicariance event separating Atlantic observed and the explanations proposed are specific to
and Pacific marine populations (Vermeij & Petuch, the Scaridae or have a more general basis remains to
1986). be determined. This requires comparisons with other
The distribution patterns of Searus differ markedly groups. Some comparative data on corals, echinoderms
from all other scarid genera. There are 39 Searus species and fish are available (Rosen & Smith, 1988; Blum,
in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. This includes the 1989) which suggest that some of the patterns observed
eastern Pacific scarid fauna, which comprises two endemics may be general ones prompting a general explanation.
and two widespread species (S. ghobban, S. However, such conclusions must await a detailed
rubroviolaeeus). None of these species are present in the appraisal of these comparative data sets. Nevertheless,
Caribbean. There are only six Searus species in the these data offer exciting possibilities in the investigation
Caribbean and one in the Atlantic. All are endemic to of the biogeography of reef organisms.
these regions.
The presence of two widespread Indo-Pacific species Phylogenetic perspectives on ecology and life history.
in the eastern Pacific, along with sightings of a Several aspects of the ecology of scarids may be assessed
widespread Calotomus species, are regarded as evidence in an evolutionary framework based on an examination
of recent dispersal events (ef. Rosenblatt & Hobson, of the cladogram.
1969). This is supported by electrophoretic data on
other fish taxa (Rosenblatt & Waples, 1986), which HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS. The above observations
shows strong genetic links between east-Pacific and contrasting the evolutionary history of the Scaridae in
Indo-Pacific fish populations. the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean, identify habitat-
It is interesting to note that the two endemic Eastern associations and the availability of seagrasses and off-
Pacific Searus species are similar in terms of counts and reef habitats as key elements in the evolution of the
meristic values to the widespread Searus ghobban. scarid faunas in these regions. This raises several
Perhaps they represent previous colonisations by a questions with regards to scarid habitat associations: in
common ancestor, rather than remnants of a more which habitat did scarids evolve? Are they a
widely distributed scarid fauna as suggested by predominantly reef-associated group as generally
Rosenblatt & Hobson (1969). considered? And what is their association with
The fact that the three immediate primitive sister- seagrasses?
groups of Searus are all restricted to the Indo-Pacific These questions were addressed by examining the
suggests that Searus had Indo-Pacific origins. This, habitat associations of extant taxa in a phylogenetic
combined with the presence of widespread Indo-Pacific framework. If the habitat associations of extant taxa are
species in the eastern Pacific and the lack of genetic substituted for terminal taxa in the cladogram in
isolation in some east Pacific fishes suggest that Figure 28, the distribution of habitat use is quite striking
Searus arose in the Indo-Pacific and was able to cross (Fig. 30). It appears that reef associated taxa arose from
the east Pacific Barrier both prior to, and after, the final seagrass dwelling forms, with the common ancestor of
closure of the Isthmus of Panama. all scarids being a seagrass dwelling species.
The present data can not establish the origins of The earlier suggestion of differentiation of eastern
Caribbean Searus species. However, biochemical and western scarid populations prior to the terminal
analyses (ef. Rosenblatt & Waples, 1986) may provide Tethyian event was referring predominantly to seagrass-
a means of evaluating the various alternatives, whilst a dwelling taxa. Thus, when considering distribution patterns
cladogram of species would undoubtably offer some of the Scaridae, it is imperative to consider both
insight into the factors that may have determined seagrasses and reefs as potential habitats. The early
present distribution patterns. biogeography of the family may owe more to
Overall, the patterns observed today appear to be the distributions of seagrasses than to coral reefs. Indeed reef
result of a series of vicariance events during the dwelling taxa may have only arisen very recently. There
Cenozoic, with subsequent developments depending on is, for example, no reliable evidence to suggest that
habitat associations, possibly with the superimposition reef-dwelling scarid taxa are more than 15 Myr old.
of relatively recent extinctions/dispersal events Although these observations are based on present
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 59

habitat associations, the fossil record does offer some worthy of further investigation.
support for inferences on past habitat associations. The
earliest fossil scarid, Calotomus preisli Bellwood & FEEDING MODES. The cladogram in Figure 28, also
Schultz (1991), was found in deposits bearing gives a valuable insight into the possible evolution of
seagrasses. Today, this represents the dominant habitat feeding modes in the Scaridae. In an analysis of the
of species in this genus. feeding biology of scarids, Bellwood & Choat (1990)
The role of seagrass dwelling species in the evolution described two basic feeding modes: scraping and
of marine herb ivory in the Labroidei as a whole may excavating. A third mode which was not described may
be of considerable importance. In the Odacidae, a family be classified as browsing, where the teeth of the oral
of temperate water labroids, it appears that the jaws are used to remove pieces of epilithic algae, or
herbivorous representatives (Odax pullus, O. fragments of macroalgae or seagrasses, without scarring
cyanomelas, O. cyanoallix) may also have arisen from or scraping the substratum.
seagrass dwelling taxa. Today, most odacids, including If the taxa in the cladogram in Figure 28 are replaced
the basal taxa, are frequently associated with by adult feeding modes, a clear pattern arises, with a
seagrasses, with some including seagrasses in their transition from a browsing mode to an excavating mode,
omnivorous diets (Gomon & Paxton, 1985). and finally to a scraping mode (Figure 31). It appears
Seagrass dwelling scarids also include seagrasses in that species with an excavating feeding mode arose from
their diet. The possible role of seagrasses as a first step taxa which fed by browsing. Scraping is a relatively
in the evolution of herb ivory in the Labroidei may be recent feeding mode.

eR eR eR eR eR eR
RR RR RR
5 5 5 5 5

CR Coral Reef
RR RockV Reef
S Seagrass

Fig. 30. Cladogram of habitat associations of scarids (based on Figure 28).

5 5
E E E E
B B B B B

S Scraping
E Excavating
B Biting

Fig. 31. Cladogram of feeding modes of scarids (based on Figure 28).

 60 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

It is interesting to note that both feeding modes reflects their probable phylogeny.
are only recorded in one genus (Sparisoma) and that In the preceding sections, the major groups of
within this genus there is a clear division between species within the family have been identified and a
species feeding in either way (an excavating feeding hypothesis of their phy logenetic relationships
mode appears to have arisen independently in this presented. All recognised groups may be referred to
genus and in clade 19). These patterns also reflect previously described genera. With the exception of
habitat utilisation patterns, with the browsers living Cryptotomus and Nieholsina, all genera are believed
predominantly in seagrasses and excavators to be monophyletic.
predominantly on reefs. Sparisoma is unusual in that In this section a revised classification of genera
within the genus there is a gradation of morphological of Scaridae is provided. For each genus a synonymy
characters that mirror changes in the family as a is given, followed by the etymology of the generic
whole, from browsing seagrass-dwelling species to name, a short diagnosis, a definition based on
excavating reef-dwelling forms. It is hypothesised external character states, a list of Recent species in the
that this diversity may have arisen as a result of the genus, notes on the geographic distribution, a short list
long isolation of Sparisoma, the history of of principal taxonomic references and a remarks
environmental disturbances in the Caribbean, and the section, covering taxonomic comments and notes on the
possible role of seagrasses as a refuge during these biology of species in the genus.
times. In the definitions, external characters include
Finally, the scraping mode appears to be a clear apomorphic and plesiomorphic character states,
example of paedomorphosis. This type of development internal characters refer to unique derived character
was suggested based on individual character state states only. All genera can be assumed to possess the
distributions but it also appears to apply to the characters listed in the family definition.
feeding mode in general. The early juvenile stages of Of the references given in this section, only original
Chlorurus, Cetosearus and Bolbometopon all feed as descriptions of valid genera and principal taxonomic
scrapers (sensu Bellwood & Choat, 1990). The references are provided in the list of references cited.
excavating mode only appears in specimens above 90 For details of the references in the synonymies see
mm SL (Bellwood, 1986). Morphological and field Eschmeyer (1990).
observations suggest that this also applies to those A key to genera based on external characters is
juvenile Sparisoma species which feed as excavators provided before the generic descriptions. A list of
as adults (eg, S. viride; personal observation). The material examined is provided in Appendix 11.
retention of a scraping feeding mode in adult
Hipposearus and Searus species is interpreted as an
example of paedomorphosis (ie, the retention of
juvenile characters of ancestral forms by adults of Scaridae Rafinesque, 1810
their descendants).
Diagnosis. Distinguished from all other labroid
fishes by a wide range of derived characters (internal
Summary characters listed below), of these, the form of the
pharyngeal dentition is particularly distinctive. The
The above discussion has brought to light a number Scaridae is unique among perciform fishes in the
of misconceptions about the Scaridae. Based on the possession of deep subtemporal fossae.
abundance of Searus species and their numerical
dominance on reefs, scarids are generally regarded as
Definition. External - dorsal fin continuous with 9
reef dwelling forms that scrape the coral substratum
spines and 10 rays, anal fin with 3 spines and 9 rays,
with fused beaks-like jaws. However, inferences based
dorsal and anal fins naked except for basal sheath of
on cladistic analyses indicate that although this may be
1 scale row; pelvic fins 1,5; pectoral fins with 2
the dominant view based on the numerical abundance
unbranched rays (the first always rudimentary) and 11-
of extant species, historically scarids may have much
15 branched rays; gills broadly joined to isthmus,
closer affinities with seagrasses than with coral reefs.
with or without freefold. Body scales large and cycloid;
Scarids probably arose in seagrasses as browsing
lateral line interrupted, with 22-24 scales. Cheek scale
herbivores which lacked fused teeth, characteristics
rows 1-4, median predorsal scales 2-8. Oral jaw teeth
that are retained in five of the ten extant scarid genera.
may be caniniform, incisiform or coalesced to form
The 'typical' reef dwelling scarid therefore, although
dental plates.
numerous, may be a relatively recent form.
Internal - neurocranium with trifid supraoccipital
crest, posterior extension on epioccipital, 1-2 pairs of
Revised Classification of Genera of Scaridae deep subtemporal fossae in ventral surface, elongate
concave pharyngeal articulation facets; pharyngeal
bones well developed, upper pharyngeal bones with
One of the primary aims of this study was to provide teeth in 1-3 longitudinal rows, lower pharyngeal
a supra-specific classification of the Scaridae which ~~~s~s~~~~~~ro~~
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 61

comprising 5-6 teeth, teeth progress like a conveyor-belt, flanges; expanded postzygopophyses on first 2
lower pharyngeal with greatly extended ventral keel; vertebrae and flanges on parapophyses of anterior 3-4
fourth epibranchial greatly expanded; pharyngeal vertebrae; 2 neural spines present before first dorsal
valve present; posterior flange on posttemporal; pterygiophore; foreshortened parhypural; Type I-Ill
anterior extremities of basipteryigium with lateral intestinal coiling pattern.

A Key to Genera of Scaridae

This key is based on external characters and refers to adult specimens. It is based on all available
characters not just derived character states. It is provided primarily as an aid to the identification
of scarid genera both in the field and in museum collections. Notes on colour patterns have been
excluded as patterns are often lost during fixation and preservation, and are subject to possible
misinterpretation. For species identifications users are directed to the taxonomic references given
under that genus in the descriptions provided below.

1. Gill membranes broadly joined to isthmus; jaws meet or upper jaw

edge enclosed by lower when mouth closed; 1 cheek scale row;
pectoral rays 13 (rarely 12 or 14) ........................................................................................... 2

- - Gill membranes narrowly joined to isthmus; lower jaw edge enclosed

by upper when mouth closed; 2-4 cheek scale rows; pectoral rays
14-16 (rarely 13 or 17) .............................................................................................................. 6

2. Individual teeth in oral jaws distinct, without cement covering;

cutting edge broken or irregular ............................................................................................... 3

- - Individual teeth in oral jaws coalesced to form dental plates, with

thin covering of cement (dental plates may be very narrow, on
premaxilla especially); single entire cutting edge on jaws .................................................... 5

3. Narrow free fold present at junction of gill membranes and isthmus ................................ 4

- - No free fold present at junction of gill membranes and isthmus

(with the exception of occasional Calotomus japonicus specimens)
(lndo-Pacific) ................................................................................................................. Calotomus

4. Elongate body (depth greater than 4.0 in SL) and pointed snout;
adult size 30-90 mm SL, probably does not exceed 105 mm SL;
lateral tooth row of dentary not extending to angle of jaws (single
row of small conical teeth may be present posteriorly) (Caribbean) ................. Cryptotomus

- - Relatively deep body (depth less than 3.5 in SL) and snout rounded
or steeply sloping; adult size greater than 100 mm SL, maximum
greater than 200 mm SL; lateral tooth row of dentary not extending
to angle of jaws (single row of small conical teeth may be present
posteriorly) (east Pacific, Caribbean, Atlantic) ......................................................... Nicholsina

5. Cutting edges of jaws formed by rows of small incisiform teeth,

with those on the premaxilla arising from the medial face of the
jaws; stout anterior canines above cutting edge present in adults;
dental plates very narrow (lndo-Pacific) ................................................................. Leptoscarus

- - Cutting edges of jaws formed by rows of medium-large incisiforrn

teeth, with those on the premaxilla arising from the lateral face of
the jaws; no stout anterior canines above cutting edge (occasionally
small caniniform teeth near symphysis); dental plates moderately
deep (Caribbean, Atlantic, Mediterranean) ................................................................ Sparisoma
62 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

6. Dental plates covered with thin layer of cement basally; individual

teeth visible in dental plates; no lateral canines present; posterior
nostril large (more than twice size of anterior nostril); gill rakers
less than 33 ................................................................................................................................... 7

- - Dental plates covered with thick layer of cement; individual teeth

visible only near cutting edge; lateral canines often present; posterior
nostril small (usually of similar size to anterior nostril); gill rakers
greater than 35 ............................................................................................................................. 8

7. Individual teeth smoothly rounded; 2 rows of scales on interoperculum;

head profile evenly convex; median predorsal scales 5-7; pectoral rays
14 (occasionally 15) (Indo-Pacific) ............................................................................. Cetosearus

- - Individual teeth with distinct nodule basally (in specimens greater

than 350 mm SL); 1 row of scales on interoperculum; head profile
steep with distinct hump (greater than 200 mm SL), profile almost
vertical in large individuals (greater than 600 mm SL); median
predorsal scales 2-5 (usually 4); pectoral rays 15-16 (Indo-Pacific) .............. Bolbometopon

8. Head profile pointed with distinctly angular snout; eye near dorsal
profile; dental plates relatively narrow with white cement; cheek scales
small, in an isolated patch, in indistinct rows (Indo-Pacific) .............................. Hipposearus

- - Head profile not pointed, snout blunt or rounded; eye not near dorsal
profile; dental plates relatively deep with white, blue or blue-green
cement; cheek scales large, in distinct rows, not in an isolated patch ............................... 9

9. Head profile blunt; dental plates broadly exposed; vertical tooth rows
alternate in possessing a tooth on the cutting edge; cutting edge
crenate; pectoral fin rays 15 or more (exceptionally 14); median
predorsal scales 4 (rarely 3) with no anterior pair (Indo-Pacific) .......................... Chlorurus

- - Head profile rounded; dental plates usually covered by lips; each

vertical tooth row possesses a tooth on the cutting edge; cutting edge
even; pectoral fin rays usually 15 or less; median predorsal scales
3-8, usually 4-6, some species with an anterior pair (circumtropical) ........................ Searus

Cryptotomus Cope, 1870 of the jaws.

Definition. Body elongate with distinctly pointed

Cryptotomus Cope 1870: 462-463. Type species Cryptotomus snout; lips covering or almost covering teeth in both jaws;
roseus Cope, 1870, by monotypy.
pectoral rays 13, dorsal spines flexible; median predorsal
scales 4, 1 row of scales on the cheek; gill rakers lO-
Etymology. Cope (1870) did not explain the ll; anterior nostril with raised rim but no fleshy flap;
etymology of the name, although it appears to be gill membranes broadly attached to isthmus with small
derived from the Greek terms kripto - hide and tomos free fold across isthmus; premaxilla with stout caniniform
- a volume or book, or a piece of a larger item, the teeth anteriorly, a single row of small conical teeth
term being akin to the term referring to the cutting or posteriorly and in adults 1-3 recurved lateral canines,
shearing action which forms the piece (Greek tomi - cut). dentary with 3 rows of teeth, anterior 2 rows with
The name Cryptotomus presumably refers to the flattened caniniform teeth, posterior row flat incisiform
hidden cutting teeth in this genus. In most scarids, the teeth (pointed prior to wear), additional row of small
cutting teeth are clearly visible. conical teeth present posteriorly in some specimens.

Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarid genera Composition. Monotypic: roseus Cope, 1870.
by an elongate body and pointed snout, small adult
size (30-90 mm SL; maximum approximately 103 mm Distribution. Western Atlantic, Caribbean.
SL), and dentary bearing pointed, flattened teeth
anteriorly, but only small conical teeth at the angle References. Randall, 1983a; Schultz, 1958, 1969.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 63

Remarks. An unusual monotypic genus. The type needed. At this stage, the cladogram suggests that
species, C. roseus, is the smallest member of the family, Nicholsina is more closely related to other scarids than
growing to a maximum adult size of approximately 103 it is to Cryptotomus. This observation, and the fact that
mm SL (120 mm TL). Found at depths ranging from both taxa can be distinguished by a number of
8 to 60 m, it is most frequently recorded in relatively features is taken as an indication that the two groups
shallow seagrass beds. Randall (personal communication) are distinct. At this stage therefore, the present generic
reports that a second species or subspecies has been distinctions are tentatively retained. However, further
collected from the northern Caribbean. investigations are strongly recommended.
Species of Nicholsina may be found in rocky
coastal areas, seagrass beds and deep reefs, from 0 to
Nicholsina Fowler, 1915 80 m. Schultz (1968) recognised two subspecies, N. usta
usta (Valenciennes) from the western Atlantic, and N.
usta collettei Schultz from the east Atlantic. Nicholsina
Nicholsina Fowler, 1915: 3, as subgenus. Type species denticulata is restricted to the eastern Pacific.
Cryptotomus beryllinus Jordan & Swain, 1884: 101 [=
Nicholsina usta (Valenciennes) in Cuvier & Valenciennes
1840: 286], by original designation.
Xenoscarus Evermann & Radcliffe 1917: 129. Type species X Calotomus Gilbert, 1890
denticulatus Evermann & Radcliffe, 1917: 129-130, by
original designation (also monotypic).
Calotomus Gilbert 1890: 70. Type species Calotomus xenodon
Gilbert, 1890: 70 [= Calotomus carolinus (Valenciennes),
Etymology. Named after Mr John T. Nichols, an in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840], by original designation
ichthyologist at the American Museum of Natural (also monotypic).
History. Scaridea Jenkins 1903: 468. Type species Scaridea zonarcha
Jenkins, 1903: 468, by original designation (also
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarid genera by monotypic).
the combination of 1) gill membranes broadly attached
to the isthmus with a narrow free fold posteriorly and Etymology. Gilbert (1890) did not explain the
2) the dentary bearing flattened pointed teeth with the etymology of the name Calotomus. However, it appears
posterior row extending to the angle of jaws. to be a combination of the Greek terms kalloyi - beauty
and tomos - a volume or book, or a piece of a larger
Definition. Body moderately deep, head slopes item, a term akin to that for the cutting or shearing action
steeply; lips covering or almost covering teeth in both which forms the piece (Greek tomi - cut). The name
jaws; pectoral rays 13, dorsal spines flexible; median Calotomus presumably refers to the beautiful cutting
predorsal scales 4 (occasionally 5), 1 row of scales on teeth of the type species.
the cheek; gill rakers 12-13; short simple fleshy flap on
anterior nostril; gill membranes broadly attached to Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarids by 3
isthmus with small free fold across isthmus; premaxilla derived character states: extended lateral projections on
with 2-4 rows of caniniform teeth anteriorly, a single the supraoccipital crest, an anterior expansion of the
row of small conical teeth posteriorly (N. usta only, posterior extension of the epioccipital connecting with
single row of small conical teeth medial to the anterior the lateral projections on the supraoccipital crest, and
cutting edge and in adults 1-3 recurved lateral canines), small conical teeth on the medial face of the premaxilla
dentary with 3-5 rows of row flat incisiform teeth adjacent to the medial symphysis.
(pointed prior to wear; anterior 2 rows flattened caniniform
in N. usta). Definition. Body moderately deep, head rounded;
lips covering or almost covering teeth in both jaws;
Composition. Two species: usta (Valenciennes, 1840) pectoral rays 13, dorsal spines usually flexible; median
in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; denticulata (Evermann predorsal scales 4 (occasionally 3), 1 row of scales on
& Radcliffe, 1917) the cheek; gill rakers 8-14; anterior nostril with fleshy
rim and simple flap which extends to or beyond
Distribution. Eastern Atlantic, western Atlantic, posterior nostril; gill membranes broadly attached to
Caribbean and eastern Pacific. isthmus, usually without a free fold across isthmus;
premaxilla with flattened pointed teeth anteriorly, a
References. Randall 1983a; Schultz 1958, 1968, broad group of small conical teeth posteriorly and in
1969. adults 1-4 recurved lateral canines and 1-2 conical teeth
on the medial surface of the jaws close to the medial
Remarks. This genus is very similar to Cryptotomus, symphysis, dentary with 3-8 imbricate rows of rounded
however, neither genus can be defined based on incisiform teeth, additional row of small conical teeth
derived features. The status of Nicholsina therefore present posteriorly in some specimens.
remains uncertain. A more detailed analysis of the
relationships of the more basal scarid taxa is clearly Composition. Five species: carolinus (Valenciennes,
 64 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; japonicus Gaimard, 1824).

(Valenciennes, 1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840;
spinidens (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824); viridescens (Riippell, Distribution. Red Sea, Indian Ocean, west and
1835); zonarchus (Jenkins, 1903). southern Pacific.

Distribution. Red Sea, Indian Ocean, west, central References. Bruce & Randall, 1985
and eastern Pacific.
Remarks. This is a widespread monotypic genus.
References. Bruce & Randall, 1985. The type species L. vmgtensis, is unusual in many
ways. It is the only gonochorist in the family and it
Remarks. Found in rocky coastal areas, seagrass has an unusual distribution, which extends from the
beds and deep reefs, from 1 to 180 m, usually most Red Sea throughout the Indian Ocean and the south-
abundant in seagrass beds. They appear to feed primarily west Pacific Ocean as far as Easter Island. It is one of
on seagrasses, macroalgae or associated epiphytes. the few scarid species to extend into sub-tropical
regions, yet it is absent from all central and northern
Pacific Reefs. Leptoscarus vaigiensis is abundant in
Leptoscarus Swainson, 1839 seagrass beds feeding upon the seagrasses. In areas
where seagrasses are lacking, it may be found in shallow
water in areas with a heavy cover of macroalgae. It may
Leptosearus Swainson 1839: 172, 226. Type species Searus occasionally be found in dislodged algae floating near
vaigiensis Quoy & Gaimard, 1824: 288, by monotypy; the reef.
misspelled vargiensis by Swainson 1839: 226.
Seariehthys Bleeker 1859a: 334.-Bleeker, 1859b: 17, 106-107.
Type species, Searus naevius Valenciennes, in euvier &
Valenciennes, 1840: 253 (= Searus vaigiensis Quoy & Sparisoma Swainson, 1839
Gaimard, 1824: 288) designated by subsequent monotypy
(Jordan, 1919: 287).
Sparisoma Swainson 1839: 172, 227. Type species Searus
abildgaardii Bloch 1791: 22 [= Sparisoma viride
Etymology. Swainson (1839) did not explain the (Bonnaterre, 1788)], by monotypy.
derivation of the name Leptoscarus, but is almost Callyodontiehthys Bleeker 1861: 230. No type species
certainly derived from the Greek leptos - thin, slender designated.
and Scarus the ancient Greek term for parrotfish, in Euscarus Jordan and Evermann 1896: 416, as subgenus. Type
reference to the unusually slender body of the type species Labrus cretensis Linnaeus 1766: 474, by original
species. designation.

Diagnosis. Distinguished from all other scarids by 5 Etymology. Swainson (1839) did not allude to the
derived character states: teeth in lateral tooth rows of etymology of the name Sparisoma. Zeiller (1975)
premaxilla arise from medial surface of the jaw, convex suggests that it is derived from the Greek terms Sparus
facet on premaxillary alveolar process, convex - "I gasp", referring to the ancient Greek term for a
palatine articulation facet on maxilla, expanded and sparoid fish, and soma - body. The name Sparisoma
raised postzygopophyses only on first vertebra, referring therefore, to a fish with a sparoid-like body.
gonochoristic.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarids by five
Definition. Body elongate, head rounded; lips derived character states: palatine-maxilla articulation
covering teeth in both jaws; pectoral rays 13, dorsal facet extending onto premaxilla, grooved anterior
spines usually flexible; median predorsal scales 4 process on maxilla, distinct notch in posterior margin
(occasionally 3), 1 row of scales on the cheek; gill rakers of coronoid process, presence of an AWCl, branched
8-10; anterior nostril with fleshy rim and simple fleshy fleshy flap on anterior nostril.
flap which extends to or beyond posterior nostril; gill
membranes broadly attached to isthmus without a free Definition. Body moderately deep, head rounded;
fold across isthmus; cutting edge of lower jaw closes lips covering the teeth in both jaws; pectoral rays 13,
over upper jaw when mouth closed; premaxilla with dorsal spines pungent; median predorsal scales 4, 1 row
oblique fused rows of short even incisiform teeth along of scales on the cheek; gill rakers 11-21; anterior nostril
the cutting edge forming shallow dental plates, teeth with fleshy rim and long fleshy flap, with 2-20 cirri,
arise medially, adults with stout caniniform teeth which extends to or beyond posterior nostril; gill
anteriorly above fused teeth on cutting edge, lateral membranes broadly attached to isthmus without a free
canines present, dentary with shallow dental plates fold across isthmus; teeth of lower jaw close over upper
formed by oblique rows of short fused even incisiform jaw; premaxilla with broadly flattened teeth, with thin
teeth along the cutting edge. cement covering, in larger specimens teeth coalesced
into dental plates, lateral canines present in adults,
Composition. Monotypic: vaigiensis (Quoy & caniform teeth present along anterior symphysis of
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 65

some species, dentary with numerous rows of broadly and southern Pacific, but not Hawaii.
flattened teeth, covered with thin cement and forming
dental plates in larger specimens. References. Smith, 1956; Randall & Bruce, 1983;
Choat & Randall, 1986.
Composition. Eight species: atomarium (Poey, 1861);
aurofrenatum (Valenciennes, 1840) in Cuvier & Remarks. A distinctive monotypic genus, found only
Valenciennes, 1840; chrysopterum (Bloch & Schneider, on coral reefs. Rosenblatt & Hobson (1969) and Schultz
1801); cretensis (Linnaeus, 1766); radians (Valenciennes, (1969) did not recognise Cetosearus as a valid genus.
1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; rubripinne In both studies, it was regarded as a junior synonym of
(Valenciennes, 1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; Bolbometopon. Randall & Bruce (1983) questioned
strigatus (Giinther, 1862); viride (Bonnaterre, 1788). this action and presented evidence to support the
retention of the two genera.
Distribution. Western Atlantic, Caribbean, central In the present study, the phylogenetic analyses
and eastern Atlantic, Mediterranean. support the contention that the two genera are closely
related. However, sufficient differences remain to warrant
References. Randall, 1965, 1983a; Schultz, 1958, the recognition of two separate genera. Both genera
1969. possess autapomorphic character states, and additional
characters which provide a practical means of
Remarks. Found from 1 to 80 m, on reefs, in rocky distinguishing the two genera. The number and nature
coastal areas and in seagrass beds. They feed either of the character states that distinguish these two
directly on seagrasses and macroalgae or by scraping genera are comparable to those used elsewhere within
turf algae from the reef substratum. Some species may the family to recognise monophyletic polytypic taxa as
excavate the substratum when feeding. genera. Cetosearus and Bolbometopon are therefore
recognised herein as full genera.

Cetoscarus Smith, 1956

Bolbometopon Smith, 1956
Cetosearus Smith 1956: 16 (4). Type species Searus pulehellus
Riippell, 1835: 25 [= Searus bieolor Riippell, 1829], by Bolbometopon Smith, 1956: 8. Type species Searus murieatus
original designation. Valenciennes, in euvier & Valenciennes 1840, by original
designation (also monotypic).
Etymology. Smith (1956) did not explain the
etymology of the name Cetoscarus. It appears to have Etymology. Smith (1956) does not explain the
been derived from the Greek terms cetos - whale or sea etymology of the name Bolbometopon, which is almost
monster and Searus the ancient Grecian word for certainly derived from the Greek terms bulbus - bulbous
parrotfish, possibly referring to the unusually large size or swollen and metopon - forehead, in reference to the
attained by the type species. large hump on the forehead of adult specimens.

Diagnosis. Distinguishes from other scarids by one Diagnosis. Distinguished from all other scarids by 4
derived character state: juvenile with distinct dorsal derived character states: a large mass of reticulate bone
ocellus. Also distinguished by 2 rows of scales on on the anterodorsal region of the ethmoid, which
interoperculum. supports the large gibbosity on the forehead of adult
specimens, distinct nodules at the base of each
Definition. Body moderately deep, head rounded; lips exposed oral jaw tooth, reticulate bone on the
largely covering dental plates; pectoral rays 14-15, dorsal palatine, 4 anal pterygiophores before the first haemal
spines flexible; median predorsal scales 4-7, 3 rows of spine. In addition Bolbometopon is characterised by a
scales on the cheek, interoperculum with 2 longitudinal deep body, with a steep profile and a large maximum
rows (1 in all other scarid genera); gill rakers 20-24; adult size.
anterior nostril with fleshy rim, posterior nostril large
and oval in adults; teeth of upper jaw close over lower Definition. Body deep, head with steep profile and
jaw; gill membranes broadly attached to isthmus with large hump; dental plates largely exposed; pectoral rays
continuous freefold membrane; teeth in both jaws 15-16, dorsal spines flexible; median predorsal scales 2-
coalesced to form dental plates, plates with thin white 5, 3 rows of scales on the cheek, interoperculum with
cement covering basally, teeth stout, cutting edge 1 longitudinal row; gill rakers 16-19; anterior nostril with
crenate, exposed teeth forming a mosaic and broadly fleshy rim, posterior nostril large and slit-like in adults;
rounded on the cutting edge, no lateral canines. teeth of upper jaw close over lower jaw; teeth in both
jaws coalesced to form dental plates, plates with thin
Composition. Monotypic: hieolor (Riippell, 1829). white cement covering basally, teeth stout, cutting edge
crenate, exposed teeth forming a mosaic each with
Distribution. Red Sea, Indian Ocean, western, central distinct nodule basally, no lateral canines.
66 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Composition. Monotypic: muricatum (Valenciennes, 1802); frontalis (Valenciennes, 1840) in Cuvier &
1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840. Valenciennes, 1840; genazonatus (Randall & Bruce,
1983); gibbus (Riippell, 1828) *; oedema (Snyder, 1909);
Distribution. Red Sea, Indian Ocean, western, central perspiciliatus (Steindachner, 1879); japanensis (Bloch,
and southern Pacific, but not Hawaii. 1789); sordidus (Forsskal, 1775); troschelii (Bleeker,
1853).
References. Smith, 1956; Randall & Bruce, 1983;
Choat & Randall, 1986. Distribution. Red Sea, Persian Gulf, Indian
Ocean, western, central and southern Pacific Ocean,
Remarks. A very distinct monotypic genus, found and Hawaii.
only on coral reefs. Bolbometopon muricatum is the
largest member of the family growing up to 1000 mm References. Schultz (1958, 1969); Randall & Nelson
SL and is the only species in which live corals form (1979); Randall & Choat (1980); Randall (1981, 1983b);
a significant proportion of the diet. Randall & Bruce (1983); Choat & Randall (1986).

Remarks. A widespread genus found only on coral

Chlorurus Swainson 1839 reefs. Species in this genus excavate the substratum
when feeding and may play an important role in
bioerosion on reefs (Bellwood & Choat, 1990).
Chlorurus Swainson 1839: 227. Type species Searus gibbus It appears that Swainson (1839) may have confused
Rtippell 1828: 81, by monotypy. Chlorogaster (p. 172) and Chlorurus (p. 173), as the
Pseudosearus Bleeker 1861: 230. Type species Searus description of Chlorogaster on page 172 fits the later
mierorrhinos Bleeker 1854, by subsequent designation description of Chlorurus on page 227. The description
(Jordan & Evermann 1898: 1655).
of Chlorurus on page 173 is at variance with the
Xanothon Smith 1956: 4 (3). Type species Callyodon bipallidus
Smith 1955, by original designation. subsequent description (p. 227). The description of
Ypsisearus Schultz 1958: 33, 47, as subgenus. Type species Chlorogaster on page 172 lacks a type species
Callyodon oedema Snyder 1909: 603, by original designation and contains insufficient information to
designation (also monotypic), full generic status by Schultz refer it to any other taxon. It is therefore regarded as
1969: 4. a nomen nudum. Likewise, the description of
Chlorurus on page 173 is considered a nomem nudum.
Etymology. Swainson (1839) did not describe the The genus Chlorurus therefore, is based on the
etymology of the name Chlorurus, although it is account given on page 227, which includes a
probably derived from the Greek prefix chloros - green, description, a figure and a nominated type species.
in reference to the brilliant green colour of the type Eschmeyer (1990: 92) regards Chlorogaster (p. 172; cited
species C. gibbus (Forsskal). as p. 173) as a misspelling of Chlorurus (see also
Eschmeyer, 1990 p. 653).
Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarids by 4
unique derived character states: dentary medial sutures
straight with zig-zag posteriorly, an entopterygoid lateral Hipposcarus Smith, 1956
process, a urohyal ventral aspect which is swollen
posteriorly, and the presence of an AWE subsection of
Hipposearus Smith 1956: 17 (4). Type species Searus harid
the adductor mandibulae. Forsskiil, 1775: 30, by original designation (also monotypic).

Definition. Body moderately deep, head bluntly

rounded or with large hump; dental plates broadly Etymology. Smith (1956) did not refer to the etymology
exposed; pectoral rays 15-16 (occasionally 14), dorsal of the generic name, however, it is almost certainly
spines flexible; median predorsal scales 3-4, 2-3 rows derived from the Latin hippo - horse (Greek ippos), in
of scales on the cheek, interoperculum with one reference to the elongate snout of the type species which
longitudinal row; gill rakers 42-75; nostrils small and Smith (1956) describes as a "typical horse-like snout".
subequal; teeth of upper jaw close over lower jaw; teeth
in both jaws coalesced to form dental plates, thick * Some authors regard C. gibbus as a species complex
cement covering plates coloured white, green or blue- comprising C. gibbus in the Red Sea, C. strongyloeephalus
green, teeth stout, cutting edge crenate, lateral canines (Bleeker, 1854) in the Indian Ocean and C. mierorhinos
present on premaxilla. (Bleeker, 1854) in the western and central Pacific (see
Smith, 1959; Randall & Choat, 1980; Randall & Bruce, 1983;
Choat & Randall, 1986; Randall et al., 1990). Colour
Composition. Fourteen species: atrilunula (Randall & varieties are also reported from the north-west Pacific
Bruce, 1983); bleekeri (de Beaufort, 1940) in Weber & (Masuda et aI., 1984) and the south Pacific (Randall & Choat,
de Beaufort, 1940; bowersi (Snyder, 1909); capistratoides 1980). There is clearly a need for a comprehensive study
(Bleeker, 1849); cyanescens (Valenciennes, 1840) in of this species, or species complex, to determine the
Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; enneacanthus (Lacepede, taxonomic status of the various forms.
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 67

Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarids by 4 1883: 274).

derived character states: articular facet on medial face Loro Jordan & Evermann 1896: 418. Type species Searus
of palatine, lower pharyngeal bone with a curved ridge guaeamaia (not Parra) Cuvier, 1829, by original designation.
separating the insertion scars on the lateral horns and Margaritodon Smith 1956: 15 (4). Type species Callyodon
a protruded pharyngocleithral condyle; juvenile colour verweyi Weber & de Beaufort, 1940: 15, by original
designation.
pattern with a single body stripe terminating in a dark
Searops Schultz 1958: 18 (16). Type species Searus
dot posteriorly. rubroviolaeeus Bleeker 1849: 52, by original designation.
Xenosearops Schultz 1958: 23 (16), as subgenus. Type species
Definition. Body moderately deep, head angular Searus perrieo Jordan & Gilbert, 1881: 357, by original
with elongate snout; lips largely cover dental plates; designation (also monotypic).
pectoral rays 15, dorsal spines flexible; median predorsal
scales 3-4 (usually 4), 3-4 rows of scales on the cheek, Etymology. Forsskal (1775) did not describe the
rows often irregular; gill rakers 45-65; nostrils extremely etymology of the name Scarus. However, Scarus is the
small and subequal; teeth of upper jaw close over lower ancient Greek word for parrotfish. The Greeks were
jaw; teeth in both jaws coalesced to form dental plates, familiar with the parrotfish species found along the
plates narrow, covered with white cement, teeth relatively Mediterranean shores (Sparisoma cretense) and were
weak, cutting edge even, lateral canines present on aware of its biology, the name Scarus most likely being
premaxilla. derived from the Grecian term scarizo - to go/take to
pasture, presumably referring to the grazing habits of
Composition. Two species: harid (ForsskiU, 1775); parrotfishes.
longiceps (Valenciennes, 1840) in Cuvier & Valenciennes,
1840. Diagnosis. Distinguished from other scarids by the
loss of the maxillary fossa on the premaxilla and straight
Distribution. Red Sea, Indian Ocean, western, central dentary medial sutures. Also characterised by a greatly
and southern Pacific Ocean. reduced A3 which inserts only on the articular.
References. Smith, 1956, 1959; Schultz, 1958, 1969; Definition. Body moderately deep, head rounded; lips
Randall & Bruce, 1983; Choat & Randall, 1986. largely cover dental plates; pectoral rays 13-16 (usually
14-15), dorsal spines flexible; median predorsal scales
Remarks. A distinctive genus, found in the vicinity 3-8 (usually 4-7), 2-4 rows of scales on the cheek; gill
of coral reefs, often in sheltered sandy areas near to the rakers 39-61; nostrils very small and subequal; teeth of
reef. Although only two species are recognised herein, upper jaw close over lower jaw; teeth in both jaws
detailed analyses of the Red Sea and Indian Ocean coalesced to form dental plates, cement white, green,
populations may result in a subdivision following Smith blue-green or blue, teeth relatively weak wearing on the
(1959). cutting edge, cutting edge even, most species with lateral
canines on premaxilla as adults, few species also with
lateral canines on dentary.
Searus ForsskiH, 1775
Composition. Forty five species: altipinnis
Searus ForsskiH 1775: 25. Type species Searus psittaeus (Steindachner, 1879); arabicus (Steindachner, 1902);
ForsskiH 1775: 29, by subsequent designation (Jordan & atropectoralis Schultz, 1958; caudofasciatus (Giinther,
Gilbert 1882: 938); status of type species determined by 1862); chameleon Choat & Randall, 1986; coelestinus
Randall & Ormond, 1978. Valenciennes, 1840, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840;
Callyodon Gronow 1763: 72. Non-binomial, inadmissible.
coeruleus (Bloch, 1786); collana Riippell, 1835;
Novaeula Catesby 1771: 18. Unavailable, rejected work.
Callyodon Scopoli 1777: 449 (on Callyodon Gronow 1763, compressus (Osburn & Nichols, 1916); dimidiatus Bleeker,
preoccupied by Searus ForsskiH). Type species Searus 1859; dubius Bennett, 1828; falcipinnis (Playfair, 1867);
eroieensis Bloch 1790, by subsequent designation (Jordan ferrugineus ForsskiH, 1775; festivus Valenciennes, 1840,
& Gilbert 1882: 606). in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; flavipectoralis Schultz,
Callyodon Bloch 1788: 242. Type presumably Searus croieencis 1958; forsteni (Bleeker, 1861); frenatus Lacepede, 1802;
Bloch 1790, listed in Jordan 1917: 45. [uscopurpureus (Klunzinger, 1871); ghobban ForsskiH,
Mormyra Browne 1789: 446. Unavailable, rejected work. 1775; globiceps Valenciennes, 1840, in Cuvier &
Calliodon Walbaum, 1792: 649. On Callyodon Gronow, no type Valenciennes, 1840; guacamaia Cuvier, 1829; hoefleri
species designated. (Steindachner, 1881); iserti (Bloch, 1789); longipinnis
Hemistoma Swainson 1839: (172) 226. Type species H.
Randall & Choat, 1980; javanicus Bleeker, 1854*;
retieulata Swainson 1839: 226, based on Searus pepo
Bennett 1834, by monotypy. koputea Randall & Choat, 1980; niger Forsskal, 1775;
Petronason Swainson 1839: (172) 226. Type species Searus obishime Randall & Earle, 1993; oviceps Valenciennes,
psittaeus Forsskal 1775: 29, by subsequent designation
(Swain 1883: 274). * Some authors regard S. hypselopterus (Bleeker, 1953) as
Eryehthys Swainson 1839: (172) 226. Type species Searus a senior synonym of S. javanieus Bleeker, 1854 (eg, Myers,
eroieensis Bloch 1790, by subsequent designation (Swain, 1991).
 68 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

1840, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; ?ovifrons Russell, V.G. Springer, M.L.J. Stiassny, D. Swofford, c.c.
Temminck & Schlegel, 1846; perrieo Jordan & Gilbert, Wallace, R. Winterbottom - sincere thanks to all.
1882; persieus Randall & Bruce, 1983; prasiognathos The manuscript benefited greatly from the comments and
Valenciennes, 1840, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; suggestions of W.N. Eschmeyer, G.D. Johnson, G. Nelson, J.M.
Leis, J.R. Paxton, L.R. Parenti, V.G. Springer, and R.
psittaeus Forsskal, 1775; quoyi Valenciennes, 1840, in
Winterbottom.
Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; rivulatus Valenciennes, I am grateful to the following people who assisted me in
1840, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; rubroviolaeeus my endeavours to locate, loan and dissect museum material:
Bleeker, 1849; russelii Valenciennes, 1840, in Cuvier & G. Nelson (AMNH); W.N. Eschmeyer, D. Catania (CAS); V.G.
Valenciennes, 1840; sehlegeli (Bleeker, 1861); seaber Springer, J. Williams, S.L. Jewett (USNM); AW. Wheeler,
Valenciennes, 1840, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1840; J. Chambers, o. Crimmen (BMNH). Additional material was
spinus (Kner, 1868); taeniopterus Desmarest, 1831; kindly collected and donated by: J.H. Choat, K.D. Clements,
trieolor Bleeker, 1849; vetula Bloch & Schneider, 1801; G. Denton, J.E. Randall, C. Roberts, G.R. Russ and R.S. Smith.
viridifueatus (Smith, 1956). The assistance of the technical staff of the School of
There is at least one additional species which may Biological Sciences and photography section at James Cook
be referred to this genus (Rand all & Myers, in University is gratefully acknowledged.
I am indebted to O. Perez and subsequently, O. Bellwood
preparation; et Myers, 1991). Several other forms for her support and assistance throughout this project.
currently placed in synonymy with species in the above This project was supported by an Australian Research
list may represent distinct species and require further Council grant in association with Prof. J.H. Choat. Additional
examination (personal observation). assistance was provided by the James Cook University funding
panel. Museum visits were supported by a Short-term Visitors
Grant (USNM) and a Collection Study Grant (AMNH)
Distribution. Pantropical, with representatives in the
Red Sea, Persian Gulf, Indian Ocean, central and western
Pacific, eastern Pacific, Caribbean and Atlantic Ocean,
including the west coast of Africa. Throughout most of References
this range, it is numerically the dominant scarid genus.

References. Smith, 1956, 1959; Schultz, 1958, 1969; AI Hussaini, AH., 1945. The anatomy and histology of the
alimentary tract of the coral feeding fish Searus sordidus
Randall, 1963, 1981, 1983a,b; Rosenblatt & Hobson, (Klunz.). Bulletin de l'Institut D'Egypte 27: 349-377.
1969; Randall & Ormond, 1978; Randall & Nelson, Al Hussaini, A.H., 1947. The feeding habits and the
1979; Randall & Choat, 1980; Randall & Bruce, 1983; morphology of the alimentary tract of some teleosts (living
Choat & Randall, 1986; Randall et aI., 1990. in the neighbourhood of the Marine Biological Station,
Ghardaqa, Red Sea). Publications of the Marine Biological
Remarks. This is the most widespread scarid genus. Station, Ghardaqa (Red Sea), (now Bulletin of the Institute
The vast majority of species are found only on coral reefs of Oceanography and Fisheries) No. 5, 61 pp.
with only adult S. ghobban being regularly reported in Andreucci, R.D., H.A Britski & J. Carneiro, 1982. Structure
off-reef locations. Species in this genus form the and evolution of tetraodontid teeth: an autoradiographic
numerically dominant scarid component in most study (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes). Journal of Morphology
171: 283-292.
localities. The highest diversity is in the Indo-Pacific Ashlock, P.D., 1971. Monophyly and associated terms.
where there are 26 widespread species and 12 regional Systematic Zoologist 20: 63-69.
endemics. There are six species in the Caribbean and Ashlock, P.D., 1972. Monophyly again. Systematic Zoologist
one endemic from the west coast of Africa. Species in 21: 430-438.
this genus are an important component of the Ax, P., 1987. The Phylogenetic System: the Systematization
herbivorous reef fish community but, unlike Chlorurus, of Living Organisms on the Basis of their Phylogenesis.
they rarely excavate the substratum when feeding John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 340 pp.
(Bellwood & Choat, 1990). Anker, [Link]., 1987. The morphology of joints and ligaments
of a generalized Haploehromis species: H. elegans Trewavas
1933 (Teleostei, Cichlidae) n. The jaw apparatus.
Netherlands Journal of Zoology 37: 394-427.
Bailey, T.G. & D.R. Robertson, 1982. Organic and caloric
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. I am extremely grateful to Prof. J.H. levels of fish faeces relative to its consumption by
Choat. This work would not have been possible without his coprophagous reef fishes. Marine Biology 69: 45-50.
unfailing support and faith in the project. From the initial Barel, C.D.N., F. Witte & M.J.P. Van Oijen, 1976. The shape
stages of the project, through to its completion, his of the skeletal elements in the head of a generalized
encouragement, guidance and advice have been invaluable. haplochromis species: H. elegans Trewavas 1933 (Pisces,
I wish to thank R.D.M. Page for his objective advice and Cichlidae). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 26: 163-265.
guidance whilst teaching me the basics of cladistic analysis Bellwood, D.R., 1986. The functional morphology, systematics
during the early days of this project. and behavioural ecology of parrotfishes (family Scaridae).
The following people provided helpful advice and PhD dissertation, James Cook University of North
stimulating discussions: P. Arnold, W.N. Eschmeyer, M.F. Queensland, Townsville, 489 pp.
Gomon, P.H. Greenwood, G.D. Johnson, G. Nelson, J.M. Leis, Bellwood, D.R., 1988. Seasonal changes in the size and
J.R. Paxton, L.R. Parenti, J.B. Randall, D.G. Reid, B.c. composition of the fish yield from reefs around Apo Island,
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 69

Central Philippines, with notes on methods of yield Browne, P., 1789. The Civil and Natural History of Jamaica,
estimation. Journal of Fish Biology 32: 881-893. 2nd edn, 490 pp.
Bellwood, D.R., 1989. The juvenile colour patterns of two Bruce, R.W., 1979. A study of the Scaridae of Aldabra Atoll.
Searus species from the western Pacific: S. prasiognathos PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow, UK, 196 pp.
and S. trieolor (Pisces: Scaridae). Journal of Natural Bruce, RW. & J.B. Randall, 1985. Revision of the Indo-Pacific
History 22: 1677-1682. Parrotfish Genera Calotomus and Leptosearus. Indo-Pacific
Bellwood, D.R., 1990. A new fossil fish Phyllopharyngodon Fishes Number 5, 32 pp.
longipinnis gen. et sp. novo (family Labridae) from the Bouchon-Navaro, Y. & M.L. Harmelin-Vivien, 1981.
Eocene, Monte Bolca, Italy. Studi e Ricerche sui Giacimenti Quantitative distribution of herbivorous reef fishes in the
Terziari di Bolca, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Gulf of Aquaba (Red Sea). Marine Biology 63: 79-86.
Verona VI: 149-160. Catesby, M., 1771. The Natural History of Carolina, Florida
Bellwood, D.R & J.H. Choat, 1989. A description of the and the Bahama Islands; containing the Figures of Birds,
juvenile phase colour patterns of 24 parrotfish species Beasts, Fishes, Serpents ... with their Descriptions in English
(family Scaridae) from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. and French, etc. 3rd edn, 2 vols, London.
Records of the Australian Museum 41: 1-41. Choat, J.H., 1969. Studies on labroid fishes. PhD dissertation,
Bellwood, D.R. & J.H. Choat, 1990. A functional analysis of University of Queensland, Australia, 433 pp.
grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological Choat, J.H. & J.E. Randall, 1986. A review of the parrotfishes
implications. Environmental Biology of Fishes 28: 189-214. (family Scaridae) of the Great Barrier Reef of Australia with
Bellwood, D.R. & O. Schultz, 1991. A review of the fossil description of a new species. Records of the Australian
record of the parrotfishes (Labroidei: Scaridae) with a Museum 38: 175-228.
description of a new Calotomus species from the Middle Choat, J.H. & D.R. Robertson, 1975. Protogynous
Miocene (Badenian) of Austria. Annalen Naturhistorisches hermaphroditism on fishes of the family Scaridae. Pp.
Museum, Wien 92: 55-71, 4 pIs. 263-283. In R. Reinboth (ed.). Intersexuality in the Animal
Bleeker, P., 1859a. Over eenige vischsoorten van de Zuidkust- Kingdom. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
wateren van Java. Natuurkundig tijdschrift voor Clements, K.D. & D.R Bellwood, 1988. A comparison of
Nederlandsch-Indie 8: 391-434. the feeding mechanisms of two herbivorous labroid fishes,
Bleeker, P., 1859b. Enumeratio specierum piscum hucusque in the temperate Odax pullus and the tropical Searus
Archipelago Indico observatarum, habitationibus rubroviolaeeus. Australian Journal of Marine and
citationibusque, ubi descriptiones earum recentiores Freshwater Research 39: 87-107.
reperiuntur, nec non speciebus Musei Bleekeriani Clothier, C.R., 1950. A key to some southern California fishes
Bengaleensibus, Japonicus, Capensibus Tasmanicisque. Acta based on vertebral characters. California Department of
Societatis Scientiarum Indo-Neerlandicae 6, xxxvi + 276. Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 79: 1-83.
Bleeker, P., 1861. lets over de geslachten der Scaroiden en Colin, P.L. & L.J. Bell, 1991. Aspects of the spawning of
hunne Indisch -archipelagische soorten. Verslagen en labrid and scarid fishes (Pisces: Labroidei) at Enewetak
Mededeelingender Koninklijke Akademie van Atoll, Marshall Islands with notes on other families.
Wetenschappen, Amsterdam 12: 228-244. Environmental Biology of Fishes 31: 229-260.
Bleeker, P., 1862. Atlas Ichthyologique des Indes Orientales Cope, E.D., 1870. Contribution to the Ichthyology of the Lesser
Neerlandaises. I: Scaroides et Labroides 1, 168 pp, 48 pIs. Antilles. Transactions of the American Philosophical
Frederec Muller Amsterdam. Society 14: 445-483, 10 figs.
Bloch, M.B., 1788. Charactere und Beschreibung des Cuvier, G. & A Valenciennes, 1840. Histoire Naturelle des
Geschelechts der Papageyfische, Callyodon. Abhandlungen Poissons, 14, pp. 1-464, pIs 389-420. Pitois-Levrault. Paris.
der K. Bohmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 4: 242- Dietz, P.A, 1914. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Kiefer- und
248. Kiemenbogenmuskulatur der Acanthopterygii. Mitteilungen
Bloch, M.E. & J.G. Schneider, 1801. M.E. Blochii, Systema aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel 22: 99-162.
Ichthyologiae iconibus ex illustratum. Post obitum auctoris Dingerkus, G. & L.D. Uhler, 1977. Enzyme clearing of alcian
opus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Jo. Gottlob blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of
Schneider, Saxo Berolini. Sumtibus Austoris Impressum et cartilage. Stain Technology 52: 229-232.
Bibliopolio Sanderiano Commissum, ix + 584 pp. Eschmeyer, W.N., 1990. Catalog of the Genera of Recent
Blum, S.D., 1989. Biogeography of the Chaetodontidae: an Fishes. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, 697
analysis of allopatry among closely related species. pp.
Environmental Biology of Fishes 25: 9-31. Evermann, B.W. & L. Radcliffe, 1917. The fishes of the West
Board, P.A, 1956. The feeding mechanism of the fish Coast of Peru and the Titicaca Basin. Bulletin of the United
Sparisoma eretense (Linne). Proceedings of the Zoological States National Museum 95: 1-166.
Society, London. 127: 59-78. Fishelson, L., W.L. Montgomery & AA Myrberg, 1985. A
Briggs, J.C., 1961. The East Pacific Barrier and the new fat body associated with the gonad of surgeonfishes
distribution of marine shore fishes. Evolution 15: 545-554. (Acanthuridae: Teleostei). Marine Biology 86: 109-112.
Brock, RE., 1979. An experimental study on the effects of Fishelson, L., W.L. Montgomery & AA Myrberg Jr., 1987.
grazing by parrotfishes and role of refuges in benthic Biology of the surgeonfish Aeanthurus nigrofuseus with
community structure. Marine Biology 51: 381-388. emphasis on changeover in diet and annual gonadal cycles.
Brock, V.B. & Y. Yamaguchi, 1954. The identity of the Marine Ecology Progress Series 39: 37-47.
parrotfish Searus ahula, the female of S. perspieillatus. Forssktll, P., 1775. Descriptiones Animalium Avium,
Copeia 1954(2): 154-155. Amphibiorum, Piscium, Insectorum, Vermium; quae in
Brothers, E.B., [Link]. Williams & P.F. Sale, 1983. Length Itinere Orientali observavit. 164 pp., 43 pIs, Molleri
of larval life of twelve families of fishes at One-Tree Havniae.
Lagoon, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Marine Biology 76: Fowler, H.W., 1915. The genus Cryptotomus Cope. Copeia
319-324. 1915 (14): 3.
70 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Frost, S.H., 1977. Miocene to Holocene evolution of Caribbean Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of
province reef-building corals. Proceedings of the Third Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 263 pp.
International Coral Reef Symposium 2: 353-359. Hiatt, R.W. & D.W. Strassburg, 1960. Ecological relationships
Frydl, P., 1979. The effect of parrotfishes (Scaridae) on coral of the fish fauna on coral reefs of the Marshall Islands.
in Barbados, West Indes. Internationale Revue der gesamten Ecological Monographs 30: 65-127.
Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 64: 737-748. Humphreys, e.J. & L.R. Parenti, 1986. Cladistic Biogeography.
Frydl, P. & C.W. Stearn, 1978. Rate of bioerosion by parrotfish Oxford Monographs on Biogeography No. 2. Oxford
in Barbados reef environments. Journal of Sedimentary University Press. 98 pp.
Petrology 48: 1149-1168. Jackson, lB.C., J.E. Winston & AG. Coates, 1985. Niche
Gilbert, e.H., 1890. A preliminary report on the fishes collected breath, geographic range, and extinction of Caribbean reef-
by the steamer "Albatross" on the Pacific coast of North associated cheilostome bryozoa and scleractinia. Proceedings
America during the year 1889, with descriptions of twelve of the Fifth International Coral Reef Congress, Tahiti 4:
new genera and ninety-two new species. Proceedings of the 151-158.
United States National Museum 13: 49-126. Jenkins, O.P., 1903. Report on collections of fishes made in
Glynn, P.W., R.H. Stewart & J.E. McCosker, 1972. Pacific the Hawaiian Islands, with descriptions of new species.
reef corals of Panama: structure, distribution and predators. Bulletin of the United States Fisheries Commission (1902)
Geologische Rundschau 61: 483-519. 22: 415-511, 4 pIs, 56 figs.
Gobalet, K.W., 1980. Functional morphology of the head of Johannes, R.E., 1981. Words of the Lagoon. University of
parrotfishes of the genus Searus. Unpublished PhD thesis, California Press, 223 pp.
University of California, Davis, 224 pp. Johnson, G.D., 1984. Percoidei: Development and relationships.
Gobalet, K.W., 1989. Morphology of the parrotfish pharyngeal Pp. 464--498. In H.G. Moser (ed.). Ontogeny and Systematics
jaw apparatus. American Zoologist 29: 319-331. of Fishes. Special Publications of the American Society of
Gohar, [Link]. & AF.A Latif, 1959. Morphological studies on Ichthyologists and Herpetologists No. 1. AlIen Press,
the gut of some scarid and labrid fishes. Publications of Lawrence, Kansas, 760 pp.
the Marine Biological Station, Ghardaqa (Red Sea), (now Jones, S. & M. Kumaran, 1980. Fishes of the Laccadive
Bulletin of the Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries) 10: Archipelago. Trivandrum Nature Conservation and Aquatic
145-189. Sciences Service, India, xii + 760 pp.
Gohar, [Link]. & AF.A Latif, 1961. The histology of the Jordan, D.S. & RW. Evermann, 1896. A check-list of the
alimentary tract in representative scarid and labrid fishes fishes and fish-like vertebrates of North and Middle
(from the Red Sea). Publications of the Marine Biological America. Report of the United States Fisheries Commission
Station, Ghardaqua (Red Sea), (now Bulletin of the Institute 21: 207-584 (1895).
of Oceanography and Fisheries) 11: 97-126. Jordan, D.S. & C.H. Gilbert, 1882. A synopsis of the fishes
Gomon, M.F., 1979. A revision of the labrid fish genus of North America. Bulletin of the United States National
Bodianus, with an analysis of the relationships of other Museum 16: i-lvi, 1-1018.
members of the tribe Hypsigenyini. PhD dissertation, Kamiya, T., 1925. The pelagic eggs and larvae of fishes in
University of Miami, USA, 653 pp. the Tateyama Bay. Journal of the Imperial Fisheries Institute
Gomon, M.F. & lR. Paxton, 1985. A revision of the Odacidae, 21(3): 27-36, 3 pIs.
a temperate Australian-New Zealand labroid fish family. Kaufman, L.S. & K.F. Liem, 1982. Fishes of the suborder
Indo-Pacific Fishes No. 8: 1-57, 6 pIs. Labroidei (Pisces perciformes): phylogeny, ecology, and
Greenwood, P.H., D.E. Rosen, S.H. Weitzman & G.S. Meyers, evolutionary significance. Breviora 472: 1-19.
1966. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional Kiene, W.E., 1988. A model of bioerosion on the Great Barrier
classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Reef. Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef
Museum of Natural History 131: 339--456. Symposium (1988), Australia 33: 449--454.
Gregory, W.K., 1933. Fish skulls: a study of the evolution of Kner, R, 1860. Zur Charakteristik und Systematik der Labroiden.
natural mechanisms. Transactions of the American Osterreichische Akademie de Wissenschaften.
Philosophical Society 23: 75--481. (Reprint 1959, Lundberg, Sitzungsberichte Vienna 40(7): 41-57, 2 pIs.
Laurel, Florida). Larkum, AW.D. & e. den Hartog, 1989. Evolution and
Gronow, L.T., 1763. Zoophylacii Gronoviani fasciculus primus, biogeography of seagrasses. Pp. 112-156. In AW.D. Larkum,
exhibens animalia quadrupeda, amphibia atque pisces, quae AJ. McComb & S.A Shepherd (eds). Biology of Seagrasses.
in museo suo adservat, rite examinavit, systematice disposuit, Chapter 4. Elsevier.
descripsis atque iconibus illustravit L.T. Gronovius, Lauder, G.V. & K.F. Liem, 1983. The evolution and
lU.D ... Leiden: Haak & Luchtmans, 136 pp. interrelationships of the Actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of
Giinther, A, 1862. Catalogue of the Acanthopterygii, the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150: 95-197.
Pharyngognathi and Acanthini in the Collection of the Leis, J.M. & D.S. Rennis, 1983. The larvae of Indo-Pacific
British Museum. Vo!. 4. Catalogue of Fishes in the British coral reef fishes. New South Wales University Press, Sydney
Museum, xxii + 534 pp., British Museum (Natural History), & University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 269 pp.
London. Lewis, S.M. & P.e. Wainwright, 1985. Herbivore abundance
Hattori, l, 1976. The pharyngeal bones of parrotfishes (Scaridae) and grazing intensity on a Caribbean coral reef. Journal of
excavated from the shell-mounds in Okinawa and Amami, Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 87: 215-228.
Japan. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 22: 221-226. Liem, K.F., 1973. Evolutionary strategies and morphological
Hattori, J., 1984. A scarid fish Searus virifueatus distinct innovations: cichlid pharyngeal jaws. Systematic Zoology 22:
from Searus ovifrons. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 31: 425--441.
188-192. Liem, K.F., 1986. The pharyngeal jaw apparatus of the
Heck, K.L. Jr & E.D. McCoy, 1978. Long-distance dispersal Embiotociadae (Teleostei): a functional and evolutionary
and the reefbuilding corals of the Eastern Pacific. Marine perspective. Copeia 1986: 331-323.
Biology 48: 349-356. Liem, K.F. & P.H. Greenwood, 1981. A functional approach
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 71

to the phylogeny of the pharyngognath teleosts. American in the West Indes. Studies in Tropical Oceanography.
Zoologist 21: 83-101. University of Miami, Florida 5: 667-847.
Liem, KF. & S.L. Sanderson, 1986. The pharyngeal jaw Randall, J.E. & R.W. Bruce, 1983. The parrotfishes of the
apparatus of labrid fishes: a functional morphological subfamily Scarinae of the western Indian Ocean with
perspective. Journal of Morphology 187: 143-158. descriptions of three new species. Ichthyological Bulletin
Lubosch, W., 1923. Der kieferapparat der Scariden und die Rhodes University 47: 1-39.
Frage der Streptognathie. Anatomischer Anzeiger 57: Randall, J.B. & J.H. Choat, 1980. Two new parrotfishes of
10-29. the genus Searus from the Central and South Pacific, with
Lubosch, W., 1929. Die kaumuskeln der Teleostier. Gegenbaurs further examples of sexual dichromatism. Zoological Journal
Morphologische Jahrbuch 61: 135-144. of the Linnean Society 70: 383-419.
Maddison, W.P., MJ. Donoghue & D.R. Maddison, 1984. Randall, J.B. & G. Nelson, 1979. Searus japanensis, S. quoyi
Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic Zoology 33: and S. iserti - valid names for parrotfishes presently known
83-103. as S. eapistratoides, S. bloehii and S. eroieensis. Copeia
Masuda, H., K Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno & T. Y oshino 1979(2): 206-212.
(eds), 1984. The Fishes of the Japanese Archipelago. Tokai Randall, J.E. & R.F. Ormond, 1978 On the Red Sea parrotfishes
University Press, Tokyo, xxii + 437 pp., 370 pIs. of Forsskill, Searus psittaeus and S. ferrugineus. Zoological
Mok, H.-K., 1980. Notes on the classification of Journal of the Linnean Society 63(3): 239-248.
Actinopterygian intestinal patterns. Japanese Journal of Randall, J.E. & H. Randall, 1963. The spawning and early
Ichthyology 27: 29-40. development of the Atlantic parrotfish, Sparisoma
Monod, T., 1951. Notes sur le squelette visceral des Scaridae. rubripinne, with notes on other scarid and labrid fishes.
Societe D'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse Bulletin 86: Zoologica 48(2): 49-60.
191-194. Reeson, P.H., 1983. The biology, ecology and bionomics of
Munro, I.S.R., 1967. The Fishes of New Guinea. Department the parrotfishes, Scaridae. Pp. 166-177. In J.L. Munro (ed.).
of Agriculture, Stock and Fisheries, New Guinea, 650 pp. Caribbean Coral Reef Fishery Resources. Chapter 13.
Myers, R.F., 1991. Micronesian Reef Fishes. Coral Graphics, ICLARM, Manila.
Guam, 2nd edn, 298 pp. Richards, W.J. & J.M. Leis, 1984. Labroidei: Development and
Nelson, G.J., 1967. Gill arches of some teleostean fishes of relationships. In H.G. Moser, WJ. Richards, D.M. Cohen,
the families Girellidae, Pomacentridae, Embiotocidae, M.P. Fahay, AW. Kendall & S.L. Richardson (eds).
Labridae, and Scaridae. Journal of Natural History 1: Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. Ahlstrom
289-293. symposium, La Jolla, California, 1983. Special Publication
Nelson, G., 1978. Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the No.1, American Society of Ichthyologists and
biogenic law. Systematic Zoology 27: 324-345. Herpetologists. 760 pp.
Nelson, J.S., 1984. Fishes of the World. (2nd edn). John Wiley Robertson, D.R. & J.H. Choat, 1974. Protogynous
& Sons, xv + 523 pp. hermaphroditism and social systems in labrid fish.
Newell, N.D., 1971. An outline history of tropical organic reefs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Coral Reef
American Museum Novitates 2465: 1-37. Symposium 1: 217-225.
Norman, J.R., 1966. A draft synopsis of the orders, families Robertson, D.R. & R.R. Warner, 1978. Sexual patterns in
and genera of recent fishes and fish-like vertebrates, 649 the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean. n. The
pp. British Museum (Natural History), London. parrotfishes (Scaridae). Smithsonian Contributions to
Parrish, J.D., 1989. Fish communities of interacting shallow- Zoology 255: 1-26.
water habitats in tropical oceanic regions. Marine Ecology Robertson, D.R., R. Reinboth & R.W. Bruce, 1982.
Progress Series 58: 143-160. Gonochorism, protogynous sex change and spawning in
Paulay, G., 1990. Effects of late Cenozoic sea-level fluctuations three Sparisomatinine parrotfishes from the western Indian
on the bivalve faunas of tropical oceanic islands. Paleobiology Ocean. Bulletin of Marine Science 32: 868-879.
16: 415-434. Ragl, von F. & F.F. Steininger, 1983. Vom Zerfall der Tethys
Quignard, J.-P. & A Pras, 1986. Labridae. Pp. 919-942. In zu Mediterran und Paratethys. Annalen Naturhistorisches
P.J.P. Witehead, M.-L. Bauchot, J.-e. Hureau, J. Nilsen & Museum, Wien 85A: 135-163.
E. Tortonese (eds). Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and Rognes, K, 1973. Head skeleton and jaw mechanism in
Mediterranean. Vol. 2. UNESCO. Labrinae (Teleostei: Labridae) from Norwegian waters.
Randall, J.E., 1963. Notes on the systematics of parrotfishes Arbok for Universetet I Bergen. Matematisk -
(Scaridae) with emphasis on sexual dichromatism. Copeia naturvitenskapelig. Serie 1971, No. 4, 149 pp, 21 pIs.
1963: 225-237. Rosen, B.R., 1988. Progress, problems and patterns in the
Randall, J.E., 1965. A redescription of Sparisoma atomarium biogeography of reef corals and other tropical
(Poey), a valid West Indian parrotfish. Notulae Naturae 378: marine organisms. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 42:
1-9. 269-301.
Randall, J.E., 1981. Underwater Guide to Hawaiian Reef Rosen, B.R. & AB. Smith, 1988. Tectonics from fossils?
Fishes. Harrowood Books and Treasure of Nature, Hawaii. Analysis of reef-coral and sea-urchin distributions from late
Randall, J.E., 1983a. Caribbean Reef Fishes. TFH Publications, Cretaceous to Recent, using a new method. Pp. 275-306.
2nd edn, 350 pp. In M.G. Audly-Charles & A Hallam (eds). Gondwana and
Randall, J.E., 1983b. Red Sea Reef Fishes. IMMEL Publishing, Tethys. Geological Society Special Publication No. 37.
London, 192 pp. Oxford University Press.
Randall, J.B., G.R. AlIen & R.e. Steene, 1990. Fishes of the Rosen, D.B. & e. Patterson, 1990. On Miiller's and Cuvier's
Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. Crawford House Press, concepts of pharyngognath and labyrinth fishes and the
Bathurst, Australia and University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii, classification of percomorph fishes, with an atlas of
507 pp. percomorph dorsal gill arches. American Museum Novitates
Randall, J.E. & P.B. Bishop, 1967. Food habits of reef fishes No. 2983: 1-57.
72 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Rosenblatt, RH. & E.S. Hobson, 1969. Parrotfishes (Scaridae) 275-314.

of the eastern Pacific, with a generic rearrangement of the Stiassny, M.L.J. & J.S. Jensen, 1987. Labroid interrelationships
Scarinae. Copeia 1969(3): 434-453. revisited: morphological complexity, key innovations, and
Rosenblatt, RH. & R.S. Waples, 1986. A genetic comparison the study of comparative diversity. Bulletin of the Museum
of allopatric populations of shore fish species from the of Comparative Zoology 151: 269-319.
eastern and central Pacific Ocean: dispersal or vicariance? Suvatti, C., 1981. Fishes of Thailand. Royal Institute of
Copeia 1986: 275-284. Thailand, 379 pp.
Russ, G., 1984. Distribution and abundance of herbivorous Suyehiro, Y., 1942. A study of the digestive system and feeding
grazing fishes in the central Great Barrier Reef. H. Patterns habits of fish. Japanese Journal of Zoology 10(1): 1-303.
of zonation of mid-shelf and outershelf reefs. Marine Swainson, W., 1839. The Natural History and Classification
Ecology Progress Series. 20: 35-44. of Fishes, Amphibians, and Reptiles or Monocardian Animals.
Russell, B.c., 1988. Revision of the labrid fish genus London 2, 448 pp.
Pseudolabrus and allied genera. Records of the Australian Swofford, D.L., 1985. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony.
Museum, Supplement 9: 1-70. Version 2.4 User's Manual. Champaign. Illinois Natural
Schaeffer, B., M.K. Hecht & N. Eldridge, 1972. Paleontology History Survey.
and phylogeny. Evolutionary Biology 6: 31-46. Tedman, RA, 1980a. Comparative study of the cranial
Shulman, MJ., 1985. Recruitment of coral reef fishes: effects morphology of the labrids Choerodon venustus and Labroides
of distribution of predators and shelter. Ecology 66: dimidiatus and the scaris Searus Jasciatus (Pisces:
1056-1066. Perciformes). 1. Head skeleton. Australian Journal of Marine
Shulman, MJ. & J.c. Ogden, 1987. What controls tropical reef and Freshwater Research 31: 337-349.
fish populations: recruitment or benthic mortality? An Tedman, R.A, 1980b. Comparative study of the cranial
example in the Caribbean reef fish Haemulon flavolineatum. morphology of the labrids Choerodon venustus and Labroides
Marine Ecology Progress Series 39: 233-242. dimidiatus and the scaris Searus Jaseiatus (Pisces:
Schultz, L.P., 1958. Review of the parrotfishes, family Perciformes). H. Cranial myology and feeding mechanisms.
Scaridae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31:
214: 1-143. 351-372.
Schultz, L.P., 1968. A new subspecies of parrotfish, Vermeij, G.J. & E.J. Petuch, 1986. Differential extinction in
Nieholsina ustus eolettei, from the Eastern Atlantic Ocean. tropical american molluscs: endemism, architecture, and the
Proceedings of the United States National Museum 124: Panama land bridge. Malacologia 27: 29-41.
1-5. Walbaum, 1.1., 1792. Petri Artedi, Genera Piscium. In quibus
Schultz, L.P., 1969. The taxonomic status of the controversial system a totum ichthyologiae proponitur cum classibus,
genera and species of parrotfishes with a descriptive list ordinibus, generum characteribus, specierum differentiis,
(family Scaridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 17: observationibus plurimis. Redactis speciebus 242 ad genera
1-49. 52. Ichthyologiae, pars Ill, 723 pp.
Scopoli, G.A, 1777. Introductio ad historiam naturalem, sistens Warner, R.R. & D.R. Robertson, 1978. Sexual patterns in the
genera lapidum, plantarum et animalium hactenus detecta, labroid fishes of the western Caribbean. 1. The wrasses
caracteribus essentialibus donata, in tribus divisa, subinde (Labridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 254:
ad leges naturae. Prague, 506 pp. 1-27.
Smith, C.L. & R.M. Bailey, 1961. Evolution of the dorsal-fin Webb, J.F., 1990. Comparative morphology and evolution of
supports of percoid fishes. Papers of the Michigan Academy the lateral line system in the Labridae (Perciformes:
of Science, Arts and Letters 46: 345-363. Labroidei). Copeia 1990: 137-146. .
Smith, J.L.B., 1956. The parrot fishes of the family Wiley, E.O., 1981. Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of
Callyodontidae of the western Indian Ocean. Ichthyological phylogenetic systematics. J. Wiley, New York, xv + 439
Bulletin of the J.L.B. Institute of Ichthyology, Rhodes pp.
University 1: 1-23. Winn, H.E. & J.E. Bardach, 1960. Some aspects of the
Smith, J.L.B., 1959. The identity of Searus gibbus Riippell, comparative biology of parrotfishes at Bermuda. Zoologica
1828 and of other parrotfishes of the family Callyodontidae 45(1): 29-34.
from the Red Sea and the western Indian Ocean. Winterbottom, R., 1974. A descriptive synonymy of the
Ichthyological Bulletin Rhodes University 16: 265-282. striated muscles of the Teleostei. Proceedings of the
Steneck, RS., 1983a. Quantifying herbivory on coral reefs: just Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 125(12):
scratching the surface and still biting off more than we can 224-317.
chew. Pp. 103-111. In M.L. Reaka (ed.). The Ecology of Yamaoka, K., 1978. Pharyngeal jaw structure in labrid fish.
Deep and Shallow Coral Reefs. Symposia series for Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory 24:
underwater research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 409-426.
Administration Undersea Research Program. Vol. 1. Yamaoka, K., 1980. Some pharyngeal jaw muscles of
Steneck, RS., 1983b. Escalating herb ivory and resulting Calotomus japonieus (Scaridae, Pisces). Publications of the
adaptive trends in calcareous algal crusts. Paleobiology 9: Seto Marine Biological Laboratory 25: 315-322.
44-61. Zeiller, W., 1975. Tropical Marine Fishes. AS. Barnes & Co.,
Stiassny, M.L.J., 1981. The phyletic status of the family New Jersey, USA, 127 pp.
Cichlidae (Pisces, Perciformes): a comparative anatomical
investigation. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 31(2): Accepted August 25, 1992
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 73

APPENDIX I

Species and numbers of specimens of Scaridae examined.

(Key: *, type species; L, information taken from published literature cited in the text)

Genus species External Osteology Myology Viscera Reproduction

Cryptotomus roseus * 16 6 1 1 L

Nicholsina usta * 11 5 1 2
denticulatus 6 1 1 1

Calotomus carolinus * 8 4 4 5 L
japonicus L 1
spinidens 11 5 3 5 L
viridescens L
zonarchus 3 1

Leptoscarus vaigiensis * 24 5 5 6 L

Sparisoma atomarium 1 1 L
aurofrenatum 6 6 1 1 L
chrysopterum 6 4 1 1 L
cretensis 20 2 l+L 3
radians 8 2 1 1 L
rubripinne 8 4 1 1 L
strigatus 11 1 1 1
viride * 7 4 1 2 L

Cetoscarus bicolor * 9 6 6 7 3L

Bolbometopon muricatum * 14 6 4 4 lL

Chlorurus atrilunula 1 1
bleekeri 24 6 6 8
bowersi 4 3 3 3
capistratoides 1 2
cyanescens L
enneacanthus L
frontalis 4 4 1 1
genazonatus 2
gibbus * 22 7 5 5 L
japanensis 5 2 2 2
oedema 8 2 1 1
perspicillatus 3 3 1
sordidus 30 21 21 21 L
troschelii 1

Hipposcarus harid * L 8 L
longiceps 8 5 5 4 L

Scarus altipinnis 5 3 3 3 L
arabicus L
atropectoralis 1
caudofasciatus L
chameleon 15 5 5 5 L
coelestinus 3 4 1 1
coeruleus 2 5 1 1
collana L
compressus L 2L L
dimidiatus 25 5 5 5 L
dubius 5 2 2 2
falcipinnis L
ferrugineus L
festivus 3 1 1 1
flavipectoralis 23 6 6 6 L
74 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Genus species External Osteology Myology Viscera Reproduction

Scarus forsteni 8 3 3 5
frenatus 25 11 11 11 L
fuscopurpureus 1
ghobban 15 6 5 5 L
globiceps 30 21 21 21 L
guacamaia 3 9 1 1
hoefleri 6 1
iserti 5 4 1 L
javanicus 2 1
koputea 2
longipinnis 3 1 1 1
niger 25 8 8 8 L
obishime L
oviceps 10 8 8 4 L
ovifrons ?1 L
perrico 1 2L L
persicus 1 1
prasiognathos 11 4 4 4
psittacus * 25 6 6 6 L
quoyi 15 5 5 5
rivulatus 25 6 6 6 L
rubroviolaceus 14 6 6 4 L
russellii L
schlegeli 25 5 5 5 L
scaber 2 9
spinus 9 3 3 3 L
taeniopterus L 1
tricolor 12 4 8 4
vetula 3 5 1 1 L
viridifucatus L 6
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 75

APPENDIX II

Material held in Museum collections

The following lists provide details of specimei1s examined in museum collections and voucher material
deposited in these collections. Material is listed as follows: institutional abbreviation, registration number(s),

CS - cleared and stained; X - radiograph; AS - articulated skeleton; °-

number of specimens and standard length(s) in mm. The nature of the material is designated as follows:
disarticulated osteological preparation;
DF - material dissected when fresh (only osteological material retained); DP - material dissected when
preserved; P - material preserved in alcohol; * - type species (collection location of specimens given); p
- partial specimen or isolated elements. Institutional abbreviations: AMNH - American Museum of
Natural History, New York; AMS - Australian Museum, Sydney; BMNH - British Museum (Natural
History), London; BPBM - Bernice P Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawai'i; CAS - California Academy of
Sciences, San Francisco; USNM - National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC.

OUTGROUPS

EMBIOTOCIDAE 005 (1:267)(0); 1. 31432-001 (1:140)(0, DF)

Cheilio inermis (3 specimens: 223 - 316 mm SL): AMS 1.
Damalichthys vacca (1 specimen): CAS 26197, (1)
Amphistichus rhodoterus (1 specimen): CAS 25832 (as
° 31430-006 to 008 (3:223-316)(0, DF)
Choerodon anchorago (2 specimens: 112 - 203 mm SL): AMS
Holconotus rhodoterus, 1)(0) I. 31430-009 (1:203)(0); I. 31431-002 (1:112)(0, DF)
C. fasciata (1 specimen: 164 mm SL): AMS I. 31433-001
POMACENTRIDAE
(1:164)(0, DF)
C. zamboangae (1 specimen: 220 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430-010
Chromis punctipinnis (1 specimen): CAS 62851 (1:213)(0) (1:220)(0, DF)
Cirrhilabrus cyanopleura (1 specimen: 91 mm SL): AMS I.
31430-011 (1:91)(0)
ODACIDAE Coris gaimardi (1 specimen: 224 mm SL): AMS 1. 31429-004
(1:224)(0, DF)
Odax pullus (1 specimen: 285 mm SL): BMNH 1893-12-13:14 Halichoeres argus (1 specimen: 84 mm SL): AMS 1. 31434-
(1:285)(AS) 001 (1:84)(0)
Hemigymnus fasciatus (1 specimen: 195 mm SL): AMS 1.
LABRIDAE 31429-005 (1:195)(0, DF)
H. melapterus (2 specimens: 230 - 260 mm SL): AMS 1. 31429-
Anampses caerulopunctatus (1 specimen: 158 mm SL): AMS 006 (2:230-260)(0, DF)
I. 31428-001 (1:158)(0) Hologymnus doliatus (2 specimens: 239 - 253 mm SL): AMS
A. geographicus (2 specimens: 187 - 210 mm SL): AMS I. 1. 31430-012, 013 (2:239-253)(0, DF)
31194-001 (1:210)(0, DF); I. 31429-002 (1:187)(0) Labrus bimaculatus (1 specimen: 243 mm SL): AMS 1. 31435-
Bodianus bilunulatus (1 specimen: 305 mm SL): AMS I. 31429- 001 (1:243)(0, DF)
003 (1:305)(0, DF) Macropharyngodon melagris (1 specimen: 120 mm SL): AMS
B. diana (1 specimen: 148 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430-001 1. 31430-014 (1:120)(0)
(1:148)(0, DF) Novaculichthys taeniurus (1 specimen: 225 mm SL): AMS 1.
B. luteopunctatus (1 specimen: 128 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430- 31429-007 (1:225)(0, DF)
002 (1:128)(0, DF) Pseudodax moluccanus (2 specimens: 157 - 185 mm SL): AMS
B. mesothorax (1 specimen: 129 mm SL): AMS I. 31430-003 1. 31430-015 (1:157)(0, DF). USNM 111891 (1:185)(P)
(1:129)(0, DF) Pseudolabrus miles (1 specimen: 234 mm SL): AMS I. 31436-
Chelinus diagrammus (1 specimen: 230 mm SL): AMS 1. 001 (1:234)(0, DF)
31430-004 (1:230)(0, DF) Stethojulis trilineata (1 specimen: 93 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430-
C. fasciatus (1 specimen: 237 mm SL): AMS 1. 31431-001 016 (1:93)(0)
(1:237)(0, DF) Xyrichthys pentadactylus (1 specimen: 163 mm SL): AMS 1.
C. trilobatus (2 specimens: 140 - 267 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430- 31430-017 (1:163)(0, DF)
 76 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

APPENDIX II (cont' d)

Species and numbers of specimens of Scaridae examined. (* - type species)

Cryptotomus roseus * (15 specimens: 36- 101 mm SL): AMNH (Puerto Rico; 1:230)(AS); 22226SD (l)(Op); 56789SD,
28712 (l)(Op). BMNH 1939.4.19:32 (Bahamas, l:64)(DP, 56799SD (Puerto Rico; 2:approx. 215)(AS). BMNH
CS); 1879.5.22:108 (1:97)(P); 1933-10-12:73-6 (Dry 1874-10-31:10 (Bermuda, l:approx 385)(P); 1931.12.5:
Tortugas, 3:53-56)(P, CS); 1976-6-3:35 (Grand Cayman, 214-218 (St James, Antigua, 4:159-262)(DP, P). USNM
1:36)(P). USNM 293163 (Gulf of Mexico, Florida, uncat. (l)(X)
1:101)(DP); 293164 (Cuba, 1:99)(P); 178004 (Nonsuch Cetosearus bieolor * (11 specimens: 326 - 410 mm SL): AMS
Island, 1:95)(P); 117120 (Dry Tortugas, 2:86-87)(P); 1. 31438-001 (Myrmidon Reef, Great Barrier Reef,
uncat. Silver Bay 2361 (2)(X); uncat. Oregon 2631 1:388)(0, DF); I. 31439-001 (Lizard Island, Great
(l)(X) Barrier Reef, 1:486)(0); I. 31447-001 (Negros,
Nieholsina usta * (12 specimens: 111 - 149 mm SL): BMNH Philippines, 1:326)(0, DF). USNM 157086, 160094,
1890.2.25:30, Rio Janeiro, (1:140)(AS); 1933-10-12:69- 113688, 157305, 147268, 113687, 160095 (as Chlorurus
72 (Dry Tortugas, Florida; 3:111-140)(P); 1961.9.4.:8- pulehellus) (7)(X), 157085 (1:410)(P, X)
13 (British Guiana; 4:128-149)(P, DP). USNM 293204 Bolbometopon murieatum * (9 specimens: 171 - 900 mm SL):
(Brazil, 1:147)(DP); uncat. (3)(X) AMS 1. 31437-001 (Yonge Reef, GBR, 1:613)(0, DF).
N. dentieulatus (5 specimens: 142 - 183 mm SL): USNM BMNH 1874-11-16:5 (Palau, l:l71)(P), 1893-8-10:6
202348 (3: 142-160)(P); 293205 (1:183)(DP); 128112 (l)(Op), 1894-10-10:10 (Solomon Island; 1: approx.
(l)(Op) 900)(AS), 1980-2-15:78 (1:927)(Op). CAS 62585, 1:205
Calotomus earolinus * (6 specimens: 192 - 256 mm SL): AMS (P). USNM 160314, 157253, 160315 (as Chlorurus
1. 31429-008 to 010 (Apo Island, Philippines, 3:200- gibbus, 3)(X)
220)(DF, 0). BMNH 1980-2-15:68, 74, 77 (Aldabra, Chlorurus atrilunula (2 specimens: 214 mm SL): BMNH 1980-
3: 192-256)(Op) 2-15:181 (paratype, 1:214)(Op). USNM 226362
C. japonieus (1 specimen): AMNH 57668 (l)(Op) (paratype, l)(P)
C. spinidens (6 specimens: 103 - 140 mm SL): AMS 1. 31430- C. bleekeri (3 specimens: 193 - 268 mm SL): AMS I. 31430-
018, 019 (3:110-140)(0, DF). BMNH 1980-2-15:96 030 (1:268)(0, DF); 1. 31449-004 (1:240)(0, DF); I.
(l:103)(Op). CAS 20232 (1: 131)(P), 20835 (1:114)(P) 31455-007 (1:193)(0)
C. zonarehus (3 specimens: 156 - 210 mm SL): AMNH uncat. C. bowersi (4 specimens: 194 - 234 mm SL): AMS I. 31460-
(l)(Op). CAS 7099 (1:156)(P); 7441 (1:210)(P) 002 (1:194)(0, DF); I. 31449-002 (1:234)(0, DF). CAS
Leptosearus vaigiensis * (4 specimens: 133 - 235 mm SL): 30557 (1:205)(P). USNM 062950 (holotype, l)(X)
AMS 1. 31450-001 (Philippines, 2:133-199)(0, DF); 1. C. eapistratoides (2 specimens): BMNH 1862-2-287 (holotype,
31451-001 (Philippines, 1:235)(0, DF); 1. 31430-020 l)(P); BPBM 16013 (l)(Op)
(Philippines, 1:235)(0, DF) C. frontalis (6 specimens: 186 - 240 mm SL): BMNH 1955-
Sparisoma atomarium (1 specimen): AMNH 28221 (l)(Op) 11-4:1 (1:186)(P). USNM 113671-8 (4:191-240)(P, DP);
S. aurofrenatum (9 specimens: 145 - 240 mm SL): AMNH 181939 (l)(Op)
56947SD, 56760SD, 56888SD, 56402SD, 30831SD, C. genazonatus (2 specimens: 199 - 255 mm SL): BMNH 1980-
56790SD (6:180-240)(AS). BMNH 1922-2-3:60 6-13:1 (paratype, 1:199)(P). USNM 223879 (paratype,
(1:145)(P); 1931.12.5: 221-225 (l)(DP). USNM 175793, 1:255)(P)
(1:211)(DP) C. gibbus * (7 specimens: 194 - 410 mm SL): AMS 1. 31448-
S. ehrysopterum (6 specimens: 67 -175 mm SL): AMNH 30747 002 (Sharm el Sheikh, Red Sea, 1:>200)(0); I. 31451-
(l)(Op). USNM uncat. (3: 67 - 97)(X); 117111 (2:160- 002 (Cebu, Philippines, 1:194)(0, DF); 1. 31460-001,
175)(P, DP) 003 (Dumaguete, Philippines, 2:410)(0, DF); 1. 31463-
S. eretensis (19 specimens: 119 - 380 mm SL): AMNH 16869, 001 (Osprey Reef, Coral Sea, 1:340)(0, DF); 1. 31464-
3507 (2)(Op). BMNH 1960-6-10:36-7 (2: 119-185)(P); 001 (Flinders Reef, Coral Sea, 1:219)(0, DF). USNM
1976-11-22:4-5 (2:235-240)(DP); 1981.2.2: 201-202 202414 (Red Sea, l)(Op)
(2:353-380)(DP, P); 1976.11.22: 4-5 (DP); 1983-9-8- C. japanensis (3 specimens: 153 - 235 mm SL): AMS I. 31449-
:188-9 (2:292-352)(P); 1983-10-11:88-90 (3:125-215)(P); 005 (1:235)(0, DF); I. 31465-001 (1:153)(0). USNM
1864.6.6:21 (1)(0); 1984.3.6: 64-67 (4:155-185)(P, DP). 051754 (as Callyodon abaeurus, holotype)(X)
USNM 94518 (l)(Op) C. oedema (10 specimens: 235 - 370 mm SL): USNM 062951
S. radians (8 specimens: 82 - 137 mm SL): BMNH 1904-6- (holotype, 1:370)(P, X); 157033 (4:241-351)(P, DP, X);
24:24 (1:82)(P); 1923.7.30:277-278 (2:135-137)(P, DP). 147305 (1:240)(P); 112224 (1:235)(P); 112232 (1:352)(P);
USNM 038676 (2:105-110)(P, DP); 163565 (1:112)(P); 160088 (1:325)(P); 147305 (l)(Op)
uncat. (2)(X) C. perspieillatus (3 specimens: 165 mm SL): AMNH 7451
S. rubripinne (11 specimens: 122 - 158 mm SL): BMNH (1: approx. 165)(Op); uncat. (l)(Op). USNM 08417 (as
1924.7.22: 64-67, 1922-6-22:96 (5:122-158)(P,DP); Searus kraussi, holotype, 1)(X)
1923.7.30: 274-276 (2: 143)(P, DP). USNM 293203 C. sordidus (3 specimens: 161 - 234 mm SL): AMS I. 31193-
(1:156)(DP); 175804 (1 )(Op); uncat. (2)(X) 001 (1:161)(0, DF); I. 31457-002 (1:234)(0, DF); 1.
S. strigatus (7 specimens: 225 - 380 mm SL): BMNH, 31464-002 (1:219)(0)
1953.8.10:10 (holotype, l)(P); 1908.8.28:1-2 (2:225- C. trosehelii (1 specimen: 288 mm SL): BMNH 1864-5-15:19
260)(P); 1959.12.30:21 (1: 275)(P); 1985.12.6:32 (holotype; 1:288)(P)
(1:285)(P); 1979.1.5:146 (1:380)(DP). USNM 163446 Hipposearus harid * (8 specimens: >200 - 419 mm SL): AMS
(l)(Op) 1. 31448-001 (Sharm el Sheik, Red Sea, 1:>200)(0).
S. viride * (10 specimens: 159 - 385 SL): AMNH 56746SD BMNH 1980-2-15:87-92 (Aldabra Island; 5:to 419)(Op).
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 77

USNM 202289 (Red Sea; l)(Op); 202294 (Farquhar S. iserti (6 specimens: 50 - 235 mm SL): AMNH 21757SD
Island; l)(Op) (1:235)(AS). BMNH 1976-7-15:12-18 (l:approx. 50)(CS).
H. longiceps (6 specimens: 59 - 405 mm SL): AMS I. 31194- USNM uncat. (as S. eroieensis) (3)(X); 175761 (1 )(Op)
002 (1:367)(0, DF); I. 31449-001 (2:375-400). CAS S. javanieus (1 specimen: 204 mm SL): BMNH 1864-5-15:21
62594 (1: 59)(CS). USNM 147269 (1:405)(P); 147412 (holotype, 1:204)(P)
(1:41O)(P) S. koputea (2 specimens: 300 mm SL): USNM 175272-3
Scarus altipinnis (1 specimen: 340 mm SL): AMS I. 31452- (paratypes, 2:300)(P)
001 (1:340)(0, DF) S. longipinnis (1 specimen: 75 mm SL): AMS I. 25789-001
S. atropectoralis (1 specimen: 220 mm SL): USNM 147217 (1:75)(DP)
(holotype, 1:220)(P) S. niger (7 specimens: 185 - 282 mm SL): AMS I. 31432-
S. chameleon (2 specimens: 254 mm SL): AMS I. 31453-001 002 (1:260)(0, DF); I. 31455-004 (1:240)(0, DF).
(1)(0); I. 31454-001 (1:245)(0) BMNH 1858-4-20:210 (1:207)(AS); 1978-9-14:8
S. coelestinus (3 specimens: 178 - 365 mm SL): AMNH (1:185)(P), 1980-2-15:28, 30 (2:271-282)(Op). USNM
35448SD, 30840SD (2:approx. 365)(AS). USNM 164283 202347 (l)(Op)
(1: 178)(DP) S. ovieeps (1 specimen: 304 mm SL): AMS I. 31456-004
S. coeruleus (5 specimens: 252 - 440 mm SL): AMNH (1:304)(0, DF)
27954SD, 35478SD, 27957SP, 27958SD, (4:325- S. perrico (3 specimens: 380 mm SL): AMNH uncat. (l)(Op).
440)(AS). USNM 088980 (1:252)(DP) USNM 65440 (1:380)(P); 087548 (as Callyodon microps,
S. compressus (2 specimens): AMNH uncat. (l)(Op). USNM holotype, 1) (X)
087549 (holotype, l)(X) S. persieus (1 specimen: 195 mm SL): USNM 224474
S. dimidiatus (4 specimens: 198 - 247 mm SL): AMS I. 31429- (paratype, 1:195)(P)
011 (1:198)(0, DF); I. 31430-021 (1:247)(0, DF); I. S. prasiognathos (1 specimen: 320 mm SL): AMS I. 31430-
31455-001 (1:214)(0, DF). USNM 061170 (as Callyodon 026 (1:320)(0, DF)
fumifrons, paratype, l)(X) S. psittaeus * (4 specimens: 127 - 196 mm SL): AMS I. 31192-
S. festivus (1 specimen: 210 mm SL): AMS I. 31430-022 001 (Sharm el Sheikh, Red Sea, 1)(0); I. 31432-003
(1:210)(0, DF) (Balicasag Island, Philippines, 1:180)(0, DF); I. 31455-
S. Jlavipectoralis (4 specimens: 186 - 234 mm SL): AMS I. 005 (Lizard Island, 1:196)(0, DF). BMNH 1980-2-15:99
31430-023, 024 (2:208-234)(0, DF); I. 31455-002 (1: 127)(Op)
(1:186)(0, DF); I. 31456-001 (1:222)(0, DF) S. quoyi (2 specimens: 235 - 240 mm SL): AMS I. 31430-
S. forsteni (3 specimens: 138 - 299 mm SL): AMS I. 31430- 027 (2:235-240)(0, DF)
025 (1:138)(0, DF); I. 31449-003 (1:299)(0, DF); I. S. rubroviolaeeus (12 specimens: 146 - 477 mm SL): AMS
31450-002 (1:229)(0, DF) I. 31429-012 (1:380)(0, DF); I. 31430-028 (1:350)(0,
S. frenatus (4 specimens: 214 - 291 mm SL): AMS I. 31456- DF). BMNH 1980-2-15:1-6, 8 (7: 146-477)(Op). USNM
002 (1:291)(0, DF); I. 31457-001 (1:214)(0, DF). 051749 (as Callyodon ruberrimus, holotype, l)(X);
BMNH 1980-2-15:173 (l)(Op). USNM 163414 (l)(Op) 055500 (as Chlorurus jordani, 1)(X); 055499 (as Scarops
S. fuscopurpureus (1 specimen): BMHN 1871-7-15:13 jordani, l)(X)
(holotype; l)(P) S. sehlegeli (2 specimens: 253 - 258 mm SL): AMS I. 31429-
S. ghobban (7 specimens: 266 - 370 mm SL): AMS I. 31454- 013 (1:258)(0, DF); I. 31456-005 (1:253)(0, DF)
002 (1)(0); I. 31455-003 (1:226)(0, DF); I. 31458-001 S. seaber (9 specimens): BMNH 1980-2-15:31-39 (9)(Op)
(1:370)(0, DF); I. 31459-001 (1:293)(0, DF); I. 31456- S. spinus (3 specimens: 185 - 197 mm SL): AMS I. 31429-
003 (1:360)(0, DF). USNM 050084 (as Searus noyesi, 014 (1:185)(0, DF); I.31454-003 (1:196)(0, DF); I.
paratype, l)(X); 065439 (as Chlorurus azureus, l)(X) 31455-006 (1:197)(0, DF)
S. globieeps (1 specimens: 175 mm SL): AMS I. 31461-001 S. taeniopterus (1 specimen: 188 mm SL): AMNH 56404SD
(1:175)(0, DF) (1: 188)(AS)
S. guaeamaia (10 specimens: 189 - 700 mm SL): AMNH S. trieolor (3 specimens: 221 - 244 mm SL): AMS I. 31429-
56726SD (l)(AS); uncat. (l)(Op); 30826SD, 22224SD, 001 (1:221)(0, DF); I. 31430-029 (2:240-244)(0, DF)
30862SD, 35440SD, 56501SD, 35455SD, 27956 (7:300- S. vetula (6 specimens: 180 - 320 mm SL): AMNH 56745SD,
approx. 700)(AS). USNM 125658 (1:189)(DP) 56758SD, 22538SD, 30844SD (4:approx. 245-320)(AS).
S. hoeJleri (7 specimens: 68 - 255 mm SL): BMNH 1938-12- BMNH 1863.8.7:96 (1:180)(AS). USNM 175803,
15:21 (1:255)(P); 1951-3-12:7 (l:approx. 220)(P); 1962- (1:241)(DP)
9-18: 142 (1 :203)(P); 1977-3-21: 148-151 (2:68-97)(P). S. viridifueatus (6 specimens: 183 - 239 mm SL): BMNH 1980-
USNM 164275-6 (2:131)(P,Op) 2-15:159, 163-7 (6:183-239)(Op)
78 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

APPENDIX III

Abbreviations used in the text figures

Ai, A2, A3 Adductor mandibulae muscles divisions 1-3

Ala, Al~ Adductor mandibulae subdivisions
A3a, A3~ Adductor mandibulae subdivisions
Alt, A2t, A3t Tendons of the adductor mandibulae (subdivisions abbreviated as A1tl,
A1t2 etc.)
Aw Adductor mandibulae muscle division Aw
Awa, Aw~, Awy, Awo, AWE Adductor mandibulae muscle subdivisions
alv Alveolar region
alv pr Alveolar process
an Anus
ang Angular
ant Anterior
ant asc pr Anterior ascending process
ant rnx prnx fig Anterior maxillary-premaxillary ligament
ant st fos Anterior subtemporal fossa
art med sp Articular medial spine
art con Articulation condyle of the pharyngeo-cleithral joint
art fos Articulation fossa of the dentary
art fac Articulation facet
asc pr Ascending process of the premaxilla
bbl-4 1st to 4th basibranchial elements
bh Basihyal
boc Basioccipital
br Branchiostegal rays
bso Basisphenoid/basisphenotic
cbI, cb2, cb3 1st to 3rd ceratobranchials
cem Cement covering of dental plates
ch Ceratohyal
cl Cleithrum
con Conical tooth
cor Coracoid
cor pr Coronoid process of the dentary
dec pr Articular descending process
dec pr fl Bone flange on the articular descending process
dent pI Dental plate
dh Dorsal hypohyal
d pr Dorsal process
dsph Dermosphenotic
duo Duodenum
duolil jn Duodenal/ilial junction
el-4 1st to 4th epibranchial bones
e4 art con Articular condyle of upper pharyngeal-4th epibranchial joint
ect Ectopterygoid
eh Epihyal
ent lat pr Entopterygoid lateral process
ent Entopterygoid
ep Epihyal
epo Epioccipital
epo fl Epioccipital flange
epl Epipleural rib
epu Epural
eth Ethmoid (mesethmoid)
eth-fr dep Ethmoid-frontal depression
exo con Exoccipital condyle
exo fl Exoccipital flange
ff Flat facet of the maxillary fossa
fr Frontal
gr pr Grooved process of the maxilla
l°ha, 2°ha Primary/secondary haemal arch
haem Haemapophyses (parapophyses)
has Hyomandibula articulation socket
hbl-3 1st to 3rd hypobranchials
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 79

ho Holes
h postz Haemal postzygopophyses
hspl First haemal spine
hyo Hyomandibula
hypl-2, 3-4, 5 Hypural plates
ic Intercalar
ih Interhyal
im Intermandibularis muscle
in Insertion site (eg, in A3t insertion site of adductor mandibulae section
A3
int bulb Intestinal bulb
ip2 Second infrapharyngeobranchial
keel Keel of lower pharyngeal bone
Zap Levator arcus palatini
lat can Lateral canine
lat fl Lateral flange
lat ind Lateral indentation of the premaxillary ascending process
lat eth Lateral ethmoid
lat hn Lateral horn
liv Liver
Ija Lower jaw articulation
m in Muscle insertion scars
med sut Medial sutures of dentary
med horns Medial horns
med fac Medial facent of the palatine
med indent Medial indentation
meth Mesethmoid (or ethmoid)
mpt Metapterygoid
mx fos Maxillary fossa of the premaxilla
mx fac Maxillary facet of the premaxilla
mx arm Maxillary arm
mx head Maxillary head
mx con Maxillary condyle
n sp Neural spine
n prez Neural prezygopophyses
nc con Neurocranial condyle of the maxilla
nc art fac Articulation facet of the upper pharyngeal
oes Oesophagus
or Site of origin of adductor muscles (eg, or AI)
part fac Pharyngeal articulation facents of the neurocranium
pal Palatine
pal art fac Palatine articulation facet of the neurocranium
pah Parhypural
par Parietal
parap Parapophyses
pc Postcleithrum
pcr Principal caudal rays
pd Predorsal bone (supraneural)
per Perforate bone
pI Pleural ribs
pmx pr Premaxillary process of maxilla
pmx con Premaxillary condyle of maxilla
pmx fac Premaxillary facet of the maxilla
pop Preoperculum
post mx pmx lig Posterior maxillary-premaxillary ligament
post asc pr Posterior ascending process of the articular
post proj Posterior projection
post st fos Posterior subtemporal fossa
pr Pectoral fin rays
pro Prootic
psph Parasphenoid
pt Posttemporal
ptf Posttemporal flange
ptp Pterygiophore
pto Pterotic
pts Pterosphenotic
80 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

qua Quadrate
rl-3 Upper pharyngeal tooth rows (row 1 is medial)
rcc Concavity marking the position of the rostral cartilage
ret Reticulate bone
sac il Sacculated ilium
sc Scapula
scl Supracleithrum
ses Sesamoid articular
so Supraoccipital
soc Supraoccipital crest
sph Sphenotic
symp Symplectic
upb Upper pharyngeal bone
uro Urohyal
uro asc pr Ascending process of the urohyal
v pr Ventral process
vl-24 Vertebrae 1 - 24
vh Ventral hypohyal
vom Vomer
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 81

APPENDIX IV

Table 1. List of characters and character states used in the cladistic analysis of the genera of Scaridae.

(All character states are ordered except those marked U in column 3; a 0 in column 3 indicates thet the
characters are ordered based on ontogenetic evidence. Asterisks indicate terminal autapomorphic character
states. The plesiomorphic character state is given in column 8, states given in parentheses refer to plesiomorphic
character states within the ingroup).

Character state
No. Character Unordered o 1 2 3 Plesio-
morphic
Neurocranium:
1 Ethmoid-vomerine process Short Elongate o
2 Ethmoid-frontal depression Present Absent o
3 Ethmoid-frontal fusion Fused Separate o
4 Reticulate ethmoid None Present * o
5 Maxillary facets on vomer [Link]. Lateral! o
dorso-Iat.
6 Supraoccipital crest Simple Trifid Extended * o
7 Exoccipital flange Long Short (0)
8 Posterior extension of epioccipital U Absent Present, Present, To crest on * o
short long supraoccipital
9 Deep sub temporal fossae U Absent 2 pairs 1 pair o
10 Size pharyngeal articulation facets Short Elongate o
11 Shape pharyngeal articulation Straight Tapers to o
facets edges a point
12 Curvature of pharyngeal facets Convex Concave o
Mandibular arch - Premaxilla:
13 Coalescence of jaw teeth Absent Present o
14 Cutting edge Broken Entire o
15 Maxillary fossa o None Trace Distinct o
16 Anterior canines Present Absent o
17 Lateral canines Absent Present o
18 Nodules on teeth Absent Present* o
19 Cement U Absent Thin on Thin on Covering o
tooth base plates plates
20 Tooth rows 6 or less >6 o
21 Jaw overlap U None Dentary Premaxilla o
protrudes protrudes protrudes
22 Lateral depression in premaxilla Absent Present o
ascending process
23 Concave rostral cartilage site Absent Present o
24 Alveolar process Simple Bifid o
25 Conical teeth mesial to cutting Absent Present o
edge
26 Conical teeth TIr. medial symphysis Absent Present* o
27 Origin of teeth in lateral Lateral Medial* o
tooth rows
28 Developing tooth rows None or Large o
small teeth diagonal
29 Maxillary facet On ascending At angle of o
process processes
30 Facet on alveolar process Absent Concave-flat Convex* o
31 Palatine-maxilla articulation facet Absent Present* o
extending onto premaxilla

Mandibular Arch - Maxilla:

32 Grooved process on maxillary arm Absent Present* o
33 Facet of palatine articulation U Absent Concave Concave + Convex * o
groove
34 Premaxillary facet U Absent Medial Anterior o
35 Anterior maxillary-premaxillary U Indistinct/ Deep groove/ Shallow o
ligament insertion site thin groove hole concavity
36 Medial ridge for Al insertion Absent Present o
82 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Table 1 (cont' d).

Character state
No. Character Unordered 0 1 2 3 Plesio-
morphic

Dentary:
37 Number of diagonal tooth rows 5 or less >5 (0)
38 Anterior extension of coronoid pr. Absent Present 0
39 Tooth row orientation U Oblique Mosaic Vertical (0)
40 Medial sutures U Absent Simple Irregular Zig-zag* 1
41 Medial suture location To edge Foreshortened - 0
42 Articular fossa Shallow Deep hole 0
43 Coronoid process Narrow Expanded 0
44 Notch in coronoid process Absent Present* 0

Articular:
45 Anterior ascending process U Pointed Notched Rounded 0
46 Posterior ascending process Present Absent 0
47 Articular medial spine Absent Present 0

Palatine arch:
48 Entopterygoid lateral process Absent Present* 0
49 Holes in entopterygoid Absent Present 0
50 Palatine dorsal process Elongate Short 0
51 Condyle on palatine Indistinct Distinct 0
52 Direction of maxillary condyle [Link] Ventral! (0)
post. ventral
53 Facet on medial face of palatine Absent Present 0
54 Reticulate bone on palatine Absent Present * 0
55 Entopterygoid Short Elongate 0
56 Palatine-entopterygoid joint Simple Ankylosed 0

Hyoid arch:
57 Ceratohyal-epihyal joint Sutured No suture 0
58 Trace beryciform foramen Absent Present 0
59 Ventral hypohyal Short Elongate 0
60 Number of branchiostegal rays Six Five 0
61 Urohyal Deep Elongate 0
62 Urohyal anterodorsal process Broad Narrow 0
63 Urohyal ventral aspect U Pointed Broadly Spatulate Swollen 0
posteriorly spatulate posteriorly*
64 Urohyal posterior margin Slight curve Deep notch 0

Branchial arches:
65 Number of gill rakers 10-33 35-60 0
66 Form of posterior gill rakers Branched Simple (0)

Dorsal elements:
67 Neurocranial facets of UPJ U Strongly Slight Straight 0
curved curve
68 Alveolar process Small Projects (0)
69 Width/height U >2.0 1-1.9 <0.8 0
70 Number of tooth rows U Zero Three Two 0
71 Tooth replacement pattern U Labroid Phyllodont Conveyor- 0
belt
72 Tooth sizes 0 Equal Row 3 Rows 2 & 3 - (0)
reduced reduced
73 Dentigerous area U Broad Reduced Narrow Elongate 0
74 Shape of medial tooth 0 Round Elongate Curved & 0
ovoid interdigitating
75 Medial margins of dentigerous areas Curved Parallel 0
76 Horn on posterior margin of UPJ Distinct Trace 0
77 Epibranchial 4 Small Expanded 0
78 Pharyngeal valve Absent Present 0
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 83

Table 1 (cont'd).
Character state
No. Character Unordered o 1 2 3 Plesio-
morphic

Ventral elements:
79 LPJ, tooth rows (No. per row) U Zero Six Five o
80 Number of tooth rows <10 >11 (0)
81 Shape of dentigerous area U Triangular Broad Square Elongate o
82 Tooth shape when worn Elongate Ovoid o
83 Raised sides on dentigerous area Absent Present o
84 Lateral horn muscle insertion scars Lateral large Medial large - (0)
85 Ridge separating insertion scars Absent Straight Curved* o
86 Pharyngocleithral condyle/facet Short Protruded* (0)
87 Lateral horn shaft Deep Broad o
88 Location of keel base U Anterior Posterior Medial o
89 Keel form Short- Long- o
tapering expanded
90 Tooth development U Labroid Phyllodont Sequential o
91 Ridge on keel Stout Absent o
92 Keel margin U Simple Lateral Marginal o
flanges flange

Pectoral girdle:
93 Articular facet on cleithrum Absent Present o
94 Medial indentation of cleithrum Absent Present o
95 Holes above cleithral facet Absent Present o
96 Posterior flange on posttemporal Absent Present o
97 Pectoral rays 14 or more 13 o
Pelvic girdle:
98 Horns on symphysis of basipterygium Absent Present O?
99 Basipteryigium anterior extremities U Pointed Lateral Rounded o
flanges

Axial skeleton:
100 First neural spine Autogenous Fused o
101 Precaudal vertebrae U 13 12 10-11 9 O?
102 Expanded/raised postzygopophyses Absent Two One* o
103 Expanded flanges on parapophyses Absent Present o
104 Form first haemal spine 'Labrid' Hypsigenyine - o
105 Number of vertebrae U 29+ 27-28 25 0/1

Dorsal fin:
106 Number of supraneural bones One Zero o
107 Spines before first pterygiophore Two One o
108 Dorsal spines Pungent Flexible o
109 Dorsal fin membrane Incised Continuous o
Anal fin:
110 Pterygiophores before haemal spine U 1-2 3 4* o
Caudal skeleton:
111 Parhypural Long Short o
112 Anterior protrusion of hypurals 1+2 U Absent Large Small o
113 Flange on penultimate vertebra Large Reduced o
114 Principal caudal rays 7+7, 8+7 7+6 o
Lipid in bones:
115 Bone colour Brown White o
Oral jaw muscles:
116 Al insertion site Premaxillary Maxilla o
process arm
117 Fusion of Al and A2 Divided Fused o
84 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Table 1 (cont'd).
Character state
No. Character Unordered 0 1 2 3 Plesio-
morphic

Oral Jaw Muscles (cont'd):

118 Presence of AlE Absent Present 0
119 A2 insertion site Includes Dentary 0
articular only
120 A3 insertion site U Articular Articular + Dentary 0
dentary
121 Size of A3 Large Small 0
122 Degree of fibre pinnation Weak Strong 0
(multipinnate)
123 AWE Absent Present * 0
124 Awa U Simple Enlarged Absent 0
125 Awo Absent Present* 0

Pharyngeal musculature:
126 Origin of levator posterior Includes Excludes 0
from supraoccipoital crest (SOC) SOC SOC
127 Travsversus posterior dorsalis Crosses Divided 0
midline

Ligaments:
128 Postpharyngeal ligament Present Absent 0
129 Maxillary-Palatine ligament Present Absent 0

Viscera:
130 Intestinal pattern 0 'Labrid' Type I TypeII/III 0
131 Sacculation of the intestine Absent Present 0
132 Lateral intestinal bulb Absent Present 0

Reproductive system:
133 Egg shape Spherical Spindle 0
134 Reproductive pattern Protogynous Gonochoristic* - 0

Juvenile colour patterns:

135 Juvenile with dorsal ocellus Absent Present* 0
136 Juvenile with single body stripe Absent Present* 0
with dark dot posteriorly

External morphology:
137 Posterior nostril Small Large 0
138 Fleshy flap on anterior nostril Small Large Branched * 0
139 Median predorsal scales Numerous 7 or less 0
(>8)
140 Cheek scale rows U Numerous One 2-4 Naked 0
(>4)
141 Lateral line Continuous Interrupted 0
142 Gill membranes, joint to isthmus U Free Broadly joint Broadly joint - 0
free fold no free fold
143 Head profile Pointed Steep or 0
rounded
 Bellwood: Phylogeny of Scaridae 85

APPENDIX IV (cont' d)

Table 2. The character state matrix used in the cladistic analyses of genera of Scaridae.

(See Table 1 for a list of characters and character states, ? = missing value, P = variable/polymorphic; Labrus,
Pseudolabrus, Odax, Bodianus and Pseudodax are outgroups)

Character number

Region Neurocranium Premaxilla Mx Dent Art Pal

1 2 3 4 5
Labrus OOOOOO?OOO?O OOOOOOOOOOOO?O?OOOO 00000 ???07000 000 OOOO?OOOO
Pseudolabrus OOOOOO?OOO?O OOOOOOOOOOOO?O?OOOO OOO?O ???POOOO OO? OOOO??OOO
Odax PO?O?O?OOO?O 1100003?2000?0?0000 00000 ?7110000 000 00007100P
Bodianus OOOOOO?OOO?O 000000100000PO?0000 00000 ?071?000 000 OOOO?OOOO
Pseudodax 000000700000 0001001000000000100 00000 ?0?07000 000 OOOO?OOOO
Cryptotomus 001001011101 0010100010010000110 01100 01020000 000 000000011
Nieholsina 001001011101 001010POI00IPOOOII0 01100 01020000 000 000100011
Calotomus 001002031101 002PI0I0I00III00II0 01110 P1020000 000 000110011
Leptosearus 001001021101 1120103011010010120 03100 10020000 000 000110011
Sparisoma 010011021101 112PI03?10110001111 11100 10120001 100 000110001
Cetosearus 110011021101 1121002121110001110 01111 10121010 101 011110001
Bolbometopon 110111021101 1121012121110001110 01211 10121010 101 011110101
Chlorurus 010011022111 1121103121110001110 01210 10130110 211 111110001
Hipposearus 110011122111 1121103120010001100 02220 10220110 211 000101001
Searus 001011122111 1101P03120010001100 02020 10210110 211 000100001

Hyo Uro BA UPJ LPJ Pect Pel Axial

6 7 8 9 0
Labrus POOl 0000 07 0?000?000700 O?O?O?O?OOOOOO O?OOO ?? 000000
Pseudolabrus OOPO 0000 ?? O?OOO?OOO?OO O?O?O?O?OOOOOO OOOOP 00 030002
Odax 0001 1040 ?? O?OOO?OOO?OO O7O?P?O?OOOOOO O?OOP ?? 100000
Bodianus POOO 1000 O? 0?001?000?00 0?0?0?0?000100 00000 10 OPOO11
Pseudodax 1010 0001 ?? 0?201?311000 0?301 ?0?000111 00000 10 010011
Cryptotomus 1111 1111 00 201120110011 101O0?07011211 07111 01 131112
Nieholsina 1111 1111 00 101120110111 101O0?00011211 10011 01 131112
Calotomus 1111 1121 O? 101120110111 10100010111211 10111 01 131112
Leptosearus 1111 1121 O? 101120110111 10100010011211 10011 01 132112
Sparisoma 1111 1121 00 102121211111 21201110121211 10011 01 131112
Cetosearus 1111 1121 00 102121211111 21201110121211 10010 02 1211?2
Bolbometopon 1111 1121 00 102121211111 21201110121211 10110 02 111112
Chlorurus 1111 1131 11 212122321111 21311110121212 11110 11 121112
Hipposearus 1111 1121 11 212222321111 21311121101212 11110 01 121112
Searus 1111 1121 11 212222321111 71311110101212 11110 11 121112

Dors A Cau Myol Ph L Int R J Ext

1 2 3 4
Labrus 0700 0 OOP? 0 0000010000 ?O 00 000 O? 00 0000000
Pseudolabrus OOO? 0 0010 0 0000000000 ?O O? 000 00 00 OO?POOO
Odax 101P 1 OO?O 0 1010000010 00 I? 000 00 00 OOPPOOO
Bodianus 0000 0 OPOO 0 OPOOOOOOOO 00 ?O 000 00 00 ??OOOOO
Pseudodax 0001 0 0000 0 0000000010 01 10 000 ?? 00 0000000
Cryptotomus 0110 0 1211 ? 0000000000 11 11 100 ?O 00 0011110
Nieholsina 0110 0 1P11 1 0000000000 71 11 100 ?? 00 0011111
Calotomus O1P1 0 1211 1 0000000000 11 71 100 00 00 0111121
Leptosearus 0110 0 1211 1 0000000010 11 11 100 71 00 0111121
Sparisoma 0100 0 1211 1 0000101011 71 01 211 00 00 0211121
Cetosearus 0111 1 1P11 1 1000201010 11 01 211 00 10 1112101
Bolbometopon 0111 2 1111 1 1000201010 11 01 211 00 00 1112101
Chlorurus 1111 0 1111 1 1011201120 11 01 211 10 00 0012101
Hipposearus 0111 0 1111 1 1101110010 11 01 211 1001 0012101
Searus 1111 1 1111 1 1111010020 11 01 211 10 00 0012101
86 Records of the Australian Museum (1994) Supplement 20

Table 3. Summary of hypothesised events in the historical biogeography of the Scaridae.

Tectonic events Age Scarid biogeography

Myr BP

15+ Differentiation of eastern (Indian Ocean) and western (Atlantic)

populations

14 Calotomus present in Paratethys (first fossil record of the family)

Closure of the
eastern Tethys 13 Physical isolation of eastern & western populations

13-0 lndo-Pacific: proliferation of reef associated taxa

5+ Bolbometopon present in lndo-Pacific

13-0 Caribbean: proliferation of rocky reef and seagrass associated taxa

5+ Dispersal of Searus from lndo-Pacific across Eastern Pacific into

Caribbean?

Closure of Isthmus
of Panama 5 Physical isolation of Atlantic/Caribbean faunas from lndo-Pacific fauna

5-0 Colonisation of Eastern Pacific by lndo-Pacific taxa