0% found this document useful (0 votes)
438 views18 pages

Scour Depth Calculations for Riprap Design

This document contains calculations for stone pitching and riprap design for a bridge bypass in Haripur. Key aspects include: 1) Calculation of maximum scour depth below the river bed using Lacey's, Inglis, and USBR methods, finding depths ranging from 9.19m to 56.59m. 2) Calculation of scour depth at bridge piers using Jain and HEC-18 methods, with results of 3.34m to 4.38m. 3) Determination of D50 riprap size for pier protection using Richardson & Davis, Breusers, and Austroads methods, with results of 2.73m to 9.91m

Uploaded by

guildkey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
438 views18 pages

Scour Depth Calculations for Riprap Design

This document contains calculations for stone pitching and riprap design for a bridge bypass in Haripur. Key aspects include: 1) Calculation of maximum scour depth below the river bed using Lacey's, Inglis, and USBR methods, finding depths ranging from 9.19m to 56.59m. 2) Calculation of scour depth at bridge piers using Jain and HEC-18 methods, with results of 3.34m to 4.38m. 3) Determination of D50 riprap size for pier protection using Richardson & Davis, Breusers, and Austroads methods, with results of 2.73m to 9.91m

Uploaded by

guildkey
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HARIPUR BY PASS BRID

Contract : Hydraulic Design of Stone Pitching,Riprap


Component : Stone Pitching,riprap
Feature : Calculation of Stone Pitching d/s of Bridges
Description

Lacey's silt factor

Flow
Bed width
Mean Flow depth
Avereage channel velocity

Flow intensity (unit discharge)

DESIGN CALCULATION:
A. CALCULATION OF SCOUR DEPTH

a. TRADITIONAL SUBCONTINENT METHODS


1 LACEY'S METHOD (1930)
Multiplication factor for Lacey Method

Scour depth below water surface

Scour depth below river bed

Scour depth below river bed

2 INGLIS METHOD (1940)

Multiplication factor for Inglis Method

Scour depth below water surface

Average Scour Depth Below Water

Average Scour Depth Below Water

b. URBR METHODS
1 LACEY'S METHOD (1930), EXPANDED (1984) BY US
Multiplying factor for predicting maximum
scour depth

Mean depth at design discharge


Scour depth below river bed

Scour depth below river bed

Average Scour depth below bed

D. SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIER


1 JAIN METHOD (1981) RECOMMENDED BY USB
Flow velocity
Pier Width
Mean flow depth
Froude No

Scour depth below river bed

Scour depth below river bed

2 The HEC-18 PIER SCOUR EQUATION BASED O


Flow velocity just upstream of pier
Flow depth upstream of pier
Angle of flow attack on pier
No of piers in one row
Pier Width
Length of Pier

Correction factor for pier nose shape

Correction factor for angle of attack of low

Correction factor for bed condition

Froude No directly upstream of pier

Scour depth below river bed

Scour depth below river bed

Average Scour depth at pier

F. RIPRAP DESIGN FOR PIER PROTECTION


CALCULATION OF D50 OF PIER RIPRAP
1 Using HEC-18 Richardson & Davis (1995) Method
Average Channel velocity

Specific gravity of Riprap


aceerelation due to gravity

Pier Shape factor

Breusers et al.
2
(1977)
Average Channel velocity
Specific gravity of Riprap
Froude No
aceerelation due to gravity

Austroads
3
(1994)
Average Channel velocity

Specific gravity of Riprap

Froude No
factor for pier shape

factor for pier shape

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Method

Using Richardson & Davis (1995) Method


Breusers et al.
(1977)
Austroads
(1994)
Average
b. RIPRAP COVERAGE
Breusers et al.
(1977)

Lauchlan (1999)
PASS BRIDGE AT RD.24+059
CALCULATION SHEET No. of Sheets
2
ching,Riprap By:
Haroon Abid

Checked:
/s of Bridges [Link]
Symbol Data Reference

f = 1.25 Medium sand

Q = 143,090 ft3/sec Maximum Channel d


B = 524.93 ft Designed bed w
dm = 13.75 ft Designed Flow d
V = 16.47 ft/sec from Hec-Ras ana

q = 272.59 ft3/s/ft q=Q/B

METHODS
Table-5-13 Manual of
x = 1.25
Practices (MIP), Revi
1
2
q
xR = 43.89 ft xR  x 0 . 9 ( )3
f

D = 30.14 ft D=xR-dm

D = 9.19 m

Table-5-14 Manual of
x = 4.00
Practices (MIP), Revi

�=0.93𝑞^0.71
R = 49.85 ft

D = 185.67 ft D=xR-dm

D = 56.59 m

DED (1984) BY USBR


Table-5-15 Manual of
Z = 1.5
Practices (MIP), Revi
1
dm Q 3
= 22.82 ft dm  0 . 47 ( )
f
ds = 34.23 ft ds=Zdm

ds = 10.43 m

r depth below bed = 9.81 m

MENDED BY USBR
V = 24.70 ft/sec
b = 3.94 ft
d = 13.75 ft
Fc = 1.17 -

ds = 10.97 ft

ds = 3.34 m

ATION BASED ON CSU EQUATION


V = 24.70 ft/sec
y1 = 13.75 ft
ɵ = 0.00 degree
n = 2.00 No's
a = 3.94 ft
L = 7.87 ft
L/a = 2.00

K1 Group of Cylind
= 1.00 ft
(Table-7.1)
K2 Group of Cylind
= 1.00 ft
(Table-7.2)

K3 Small dunes
= 1.10 ft
(Table-7.3)
F1 = 1.17 -

ds = 14.38 ft

ds = 4.38 m

cour depth at pier = 3.86 m

OTECTION
RIPRAP
is (1995) Method
Ve = 24.70 ft/sec

Sg = 2.65 -
g = 32.20 ft/sec2

K1 = 1.50 Rounded Pier

D50 = 8.94 ft

D50 = 2.73 m

Ve = 24.70 ft/sec
Sg = 2.65 -
Fr = 1.17
g = 32.20 ft/sec2

D50 = 32.51 ft

D50 = 9.91 m

Ve = 24.70 ft/sec
Sg = 2.65 -

Fr = 1.17 -
Kp = 2.25 -
Kv = 1.00 -

D50 = 14.99 ft

D50 = 4.57 m

D50 (m)

2.73

9.91

4.57

5.73

C = 2.40 m 2b from pier fa

1b to 1.5 b in all directi


pier face. Sy nthetic filte
C = 1.80 m
should have lateral exten
of the lateral extent of the
Rev.
0
Date:
12-Jun-18
Date:
12-Jun-18
ce

Medium sand

ximum Channel discharge


Designed bed width
Designed Flow depth
from Hec-Ras analysis

q=Q/B
e-5-13 Manual of Irrigation
tices (MIP), Revised 2017
1
2
q
 x 0 .9 ( )3
f

D=xR-dm

e-5-14 Manual of Irrigation


tices (MIP), Revised 2017

�=0.93𝑞^0.71

D=xR-dm

e-5-15 Manual of Irrigation


tices (MIP), Revised 2017
1
Q 3
0 . 47 ( )
f
ds=Zdm
Group of Cylinders
(Table-7.1)
Group of Cylinders
(Table-7.2)
Small dunes
(Table-7.3)
Rounded Piers
2b from pier face

5 b in all directions from the


e. Sy nthetic filter (if placed)
ave lateral extent about 75%
eral extent of the riprap layer.

You might also like