Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
9TH Judicial Region
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, CRIM. CASE NO. _____
Plaintiff,
-VERSUS- -for
ESTAFA DEFINED AND PENALIZED
Chanel Gucci lv, UNDER ARTICLE 315-2 (a) OF THE
Accused. REVISED PENAL CODE
X-------------------------X
MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
COMES NOW Accused ______________, through the undersigned
counsel, and unto the Honorable Court most respectfully states:
That the above-named accused was charged of ESTAFA Defined and
Penalized under Article 315-2 (a) of the Revised Penal Code;
That upon perusal of the records of the case, the amount involved in
Criminal Case No. 26728 is Twenty-Five Thousand;
That pursuant to Republic Act No. 10951or An Act Adjusting the Amount
or the Value of Property and Damage on Which a Penalty is Based and the Fines
Imposed Under the Revised Penal Code, Amending for the Purpose Act No.
3815, Otherwise Known as “The Revised Penal Code”, as Amended, Article 315
states as follows:
“ART. 315. Swindling (estafa).— Any person who shall defraud
another by any of the means mentioned hereinbelow shall be punished by:
Xxx
“4th. By arresto mayor in its medium and maximum periods, if such
amount does not exceed Forty thousand pesos (₱40,000):
That crimes with a penalty punishable by arresto mayor fall within the
jurisdiction of the Municipal Trial Courts;
That the above-entitled case fall within the jurisdiction of the Municipal
Trial Court, the amount involved as stated in the Information does not exceed
Forty Thousand Pesos (P40,000.00), hence this Honorable Court has no
jurisdiction to try the above-entitled case;
That in view hereof Accused through counsel moves for the DISMISSAL
of the above-entitled case for lack of jurisdiction.
1
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, in view of the above, it is respectfully prayed of the
Honorable Court to DISMISS the instant case for lack of jurisdiction.
________________, Philippines.