TRANSPORTATION LAW MAY 3 QUIZ & READING ASSIGNMENT Page 1 of 4

2. LITONJUA SHIPPING INC., petitioners, vs. NATIONAL

CHAPTER 14 - CHARTER PARTIES SEAMEN BOARD and GREGORIO P. CANDONGO,
respondents. [G.R. No. 51910. August 10, 1989*
1. DEFINITION


*Case: CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., petitioner, vs. SULPICIO
LINES, INC., GO SIOC SO, ENRIQUE S. GO, EUSEBIO S. GO,
CARLOS S. GO, VICTORIANO S. GO, DOMINADOR S. GO, 3. EFFECT OF CHARTER ON CHARACTER OF CARRIERS

RICARDO S. GO, EDWARD S. GO, ARTURO S. GO, EDGAR S.

*Cases: 

GO, EDMUND S. GO, FRANCISCO SORIANO, VECTOR

1. CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., petitioner, vs. SULPICIO
SHIPPING CORPORATION, TERESITA G. CAÑEZAL AND
LINES, INC., GO SIOC SO, ENRIQUE S. GO, EUSEBIO
SOTERA E. CAÑEZAL, respondents. [G.R. No. 131166.
S. GO, CARLOS S. GO, VICTORIANO S. GO,
September 30, 1999.]

DOMINADOR S. GO, RICARDO S. GO, EDWARD S. GO,

ARTURO S. GO, EDGAR S. GO, EDMUND S. GO,
2. DIFFERENT KINDS OF CHARTER PARTIES

2.01 BAREBOAT CHARTER

FRANCISCO SORIANO, VECTOR SHIPPING
*Cases: 
CORPORATION, TERESITA G. CAÑEZAL AND SOTERA
1. COASTWISE LIGHTERAGE CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. E. CAÑEZAL, respondents. [G.R. No. 131166.
COURT OF APPEALS and the PHILIPPINE GENERAL September 30, 1999.]
INSURANCE COMPANY, respondents. [G.R. No. 114167. July 2. PLANTERS PRODUCTS, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT
12, 1995.] OF APPEALS, SORIAMONT STEAMSHIP AGENCIES
2. LITONJUA SHIPPING INC., petitioners, vs. NATIONAL AND KYOSEI KISEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA,
SEAMEN BOARD and GREGORIO P. CANDONGO, respondents. [G.R. No. 101503. September 15, 1993.]
respondents. [G.R. No. 51910. August 10, 1989*]
4. PERSONS WHO MAY MAKE CHARTER

4.01 CHARTERER

 2.02 CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT

4.02 PART OWNERS

*Cases:
4.03 SHIP AGENT

4.04 CAPTAIN OR MASTER

1. PLANTERS PRODUCTS, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT

OF APPEALS, SORIAMONT STEAMSHIP AGENCIES 5. REQUISITES OF A VALID CHARTER PARTY

AND KYOSEI KISEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, 6. FREIGHT

6.01 WHEN PAYMENT IS NOT EXCUSED

respondents. [G.R. No. 101503. September 15, 1993.]

6.02 INCREASE IN WEIGHT

TRANSPORTATION LAW MAY 3 QUIZ & READING ASSIGNMENT Page 2 of 4

7. PORT OF UNLOADING
5. CONSEQUENCES OF LOSS OF EFFECTS OF THE LOAN

8. DEMURRAGE
6. PREFERENCE 

8.01 COMPUTATION OF LAY DAYS

7. CODE OF COMMERCE PROVISIONS

8.02 DEADFREIGHT

9. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CHARTER PARTIES

9.01 SHIPOWNER OR CAPTAIN

CHAPTER 16 - AVERAGES
9.02 CHARTERER

9.03 LIABILITY OF CHARTERER TO SHIPOWNER IN CASE OF 1. AVERAGES IN GENERAL

BAREBOAT CHARTER
2. SIMPLE AVERAGE

*Case: AGUSTIN P. DELA TORRE, petitioner, vs. THE 2.01 BY WHOM BORNE

HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, CRISOSTOMO G. 2.02 EXAMPLES OF SIMPLE AVERAGES

CONCEPCION, RAMON "BOY" LARRAZABAL, PHILIPPINE 3. GENERAL AVERAGE

TRIGON SHIPYARD CORPORATION, and ROLAND G. DELA 4. REQUISITES OF GENERAL AVERAGE 

TORRE, respondents. [G.R. No. 160088. July 13, 2011.]

*Case: A. MAGSAYSAY, INC., plaintiff-appellee, vs.
ANASTACIO AGAN, defendant-appellant. [G.R. No. L-6393.
10. REPLACEMENT OF VESSEL
January 31, 1955.]

11. EFFECT OF BILL OD LADING

12. FREIGHT
4.01 COMMON DANGER

12.01 LIEN ON CARGOES

4.02 DELIBERATE SACRIFICE

13. CODE OF COMMERCE PROVISIONS

4.03 SUCCESSFUL SACRIFICE

4.04 COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL STEPS

4.05 ORDER OF JETTISON

4.06 EXAMPLES OF GENERAL AVERAGE

5. WHO BEARS GENERAL AVERAGE

5.01 INSURERS

CHAPTER 15 - LOANS ON BOTTOMRY AND RESPONDENTIA 5.02 LENDER ON BOTTOMRY AND RESPONDENTIA

5.03 WHO IS ENTITLED TO INDEMNITY

1. DEFINITIONS AND CONCEPTS

*Case: STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW YORK, plaintiff-
2. DISTINGUISHED FROM SIMPLE LOAN
appellee, vs. MANUEL LOPEZ CASTELO, defendant-
2.01 WHEN SIMPLE LOAN APPLIES
appellant. [G.R. No. 13695. October 18, 1921.] 
3. AUTHORITY TO CONSTITUTE LOAN ON
RESPONDENTIA

4. FORMS OF THE LOAN

TRANSPORTATION LAW MAY 3 QUIZ & READING ASSIGNMENT Page 3 of 4

*Cases: 

6. EFFECT OF NEGLIGENCE
1. C. B. WILLIAMS, plaintiff-appellant , vs. TEODORO R.
*Case: AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE, COMPANY, YANGCO, defendant-appellant. [G.R. No. 8325. March
petitioner , vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS and NATIONAL 10, 1914.]
MARINE CORPORATION and/or NATIONAL MARINE 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
CORPORATION (Manila), respondents. [G.R. No. 94149. May plaintiff-appellee, vs. PHILIPPINE STEAMSHIP CO.,
5, 1992.] INC., and FERNANDEZ HERMANOS, defendants.
PHILIPPINE STEAMSHIP CO., INC., appellant. [G.R.
7. APPORTIONMENT
No. 18957. January 16, 1923.]
8. PROOF AND LIQUIDATION OF AVERAGE: CODE OF 3. GORGONIO DE SARASOLA, plaintiff-appellee, vs. YU
COMMERCE
BIAO SONTUA, defendant-appellant. [G.R. No. 22630.
9. YORK-ANTWERP RULES
January 31, 1925.]

6. SPECIFIC RULES UNDER THE CODE OF COMMERCE

CHAPTER 17 - COLLISIONS 6.01 ONE VESSEL AT FAULT

*Case: SMITH BELL AND COMPANY (PHILIPPINES), INC. and

1. DEFINITIONS

TOKYO MARINE AND FIRE INSURANCE CO., INC.,

2. ZONES IN COLLISSION

petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS and CARLOS A.

2.01 ERROR IN EXTREMIS

GO THONG AND CO., respondents. [G.R. No. 56294. May 20,

*Case: A URRUTIA & CO., plaintiff-appellee, vs. BACO RIVER
1991.]

PLANTATION CO., defendant-appellee, M. GARZA,

intervener-appellant. [G.R. No. 7675. March 25, 1913.]

6.02 BOTH VESSELS AT FAULT

*Case: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,

3. APPLICABLE LAW

plaintiff-appellee, vs. PHILIPPINE STEAMSHIP CO., INC., and

*Case: NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, petitioner-
FERNANDEZ HERMANOS, defendants. PHILIPPINE
appellant, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS and DEVELOPMENT
STEAMSHIP CO., INC., appellant. [G.R. No. 18957. January
INSURANCE & SURETY CORPORATION, respondents-
16, 1923.]

appellees. [G.R. No. L-49407. August 19, 1988.]

6.02 PARTY AT FAULT CANNOT BE DETERMINED

3.01 COLREGS

*Case: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,

4. RULES IB LIABILITY

plaintiff-appellee, vs. PHILIPPINE STEAMSHIP CO., INC., and

5. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND LAST CLEAR
CHANCE NOT APPLICABLE
FERNANDEZ HERMANOS, defendants. PHILIPPINE
TRANSPORTATION LAW MAY 3 QUIZ & READING ASSIGNMENT Page 4 of 4

STEAMSHIP CO., INC., appellant. [G.R. No. 18957. January

16, 1923.]

6.04 CAUSE IS FORTUITOUS EVENT

6.05 THIRD PERSON IS AT FAULT

7. SINKING ON THE WAY TO PORT

8. PRESENCE OF PILOTS

9. EXTENT OF LIABILITY

10. COLLISION IN FOREIGN WATERS

11. PROTEST

11.01 PROTEST MANDATORY

12. LIMITED LIABILITY RULE

CHAPTER 18 - ARRIVAL UNDER STRESS AND SHIPWRECKS

1. ARRIVAL UNDER STRESS

1.01 DETERMINE OF PROPRIETY

1.02 PROTEST

1.03 WHEN ARRIVAL UNDER STRESS IS IMPROPER

1.04 EXPENSES

1.05 UNLOADING OF CARGOES TO MAKE REPAIRS

1.06 CUSTODY OF CARGO

1.07 LIABILITY OF CAPTAIN

2. SHIPWRECKS

2.01 CODE OF COMMERCE PROVISIONS

2.02 PROTEST

2.03 OTHER PROVISIONS ON SHIPWRECK

3. CHARTER PARTIES

4. LOAN