100% found this document useful (2 votes)
412 views2 pages

The Sun of Intellect: Humanity's Dilemma

The document summarizes Jacquetta Hawkes' conclusion to her 1962 book "Man and the Sun". It discusses how the detonation of the first hydrogen bomb in 1952 marked mankind's creation of an "artificial sun". However, this was "not a star of peace" as tensions rose between the US and USSR who now both possessed such powerful weapons. It questions whether modern scientists, in their pursuit of knowledge, are leading humanity to self-destruction, as Prometheus did in Greek mythology. In the end, it expresses hope that a new religion may arise to help humanity find meaning and harmony in the face of this existential threat posed by modern science and technology.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
412 views2 pages

The Sun of Intellect: Humanity's Dilemma

The document summarizes Jacquetta Hawkes' conclusion to her 1962 book "Man and the Sun". It discusses how the detonation of the first hydrogen bomb in 1952 marked mankind's creation of an "artificial sun". However, this was "not a star of peace" as tensions rose between the US and USSR who now both possessed such powerful weapons. It questions whether modern scientists, in their pursuit of knowledge, are leading humanity to self-destruction, as Prometheus did in Greek mythology. In the end, it expresses hope that a new religion may arise to help humanity find meaning and harmony in the face of this existential threat posed by modern science and technology.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SUN OF INTELLECT

The conclusion to Man and the Sun


by Jacquetta Hawkes (1962)

Chapter 10: Sun of Intellect


During the autumn of 1952 thousands of scientists, engineers and nuclear warriors
congregated at the coral island of Eniwetok in the Marshall Islands. The bomb-makers,
with their sickening fondness for trivializing high tragedy, called their creation Mike. We
can, I suppose, be thankful that the P.R. men had not been allowed to name it New
Hope or Peace Maker. The thing was set up on the islet of Elugaleb. When it was
detonated on the morning of 1st November, a fireball three and a half miles across lifted
into the air and Elugaleb disappeared below the sea...
Man's first artificial sun rose above the Pacific, but it was not a star of peace. The
Russians watched their own sun rise within a year. So now two chosen people, each
confident that they were the children of light, confronted one another across the globe
with suns in their bandoliers.
Before the decade was out earth had its man-made satellites and the face of the moon
had been struck. In this present year of A.D. 1962, three representatives of Homo sapiens
have already seen the sun shining in the black skies of interplanetary space. The pace quickens.
Prometheus stole fire from the gods, the fire which has so often been kindled as a
symbol of the sun. We have stolen the secret formula of the sun itself. The Titan defied
Almighty Zeus on behalf of mankind, and for his sacrilege had to suffer torments from
the talons of the eagle, bird of the sun. So he has been a hero for all Apollonians, for the
Greeks, for the men of the Renaissance, for ourselves. Prometheus, yes, and Icarus,
Phaeton and Faust as well. Is our modern Prometheus, the total scientist, in his greater
pride, his more reckless defiance of the gods, about to lead us all to self-destruction? In
our hundreds of millions we mass on the face of the earth in helpless expectation of a
searing death more terrible than that spread by Phaeton when he found he could not hold
the horses of the sun.
In following the solar cycle of this book, I have honoured those who worshipped the
Sun God in his many forms. Yet I have also honoured those scientists whose probing
minds have dispelled the simple divinity of the star. The members of the Holy Office
were right to be fearful of the ideas of Copernicus to see that they would lead to the
destruction of many of the old religious forms. They were wrong as well as ridiculous
trying to turn back the tide of science, of man's efforts to comprehend the physical
universe, for that pursuit is a part of what is divine in humanity. We have to honour both
the King of Heaven and Prometheus.
The present peril and despair of humanity show that we cannot live without religious
meaning although we may we do without religious institutions. (The time may come
when even those few who still follow them turn against priests who in gem-encrusted
copes and mitres, serve Him who taught poverty and humility, who betray Him who
-2-

taught love of one enemy by raising no murmur against a holocaust of hate.) If we cannot
find god in the world, we lose Him in ourselves and become contemptible in our own
eyes. We become mere statistics. For this is the greatest evil coming from the unbalanced
Apollonian mind. Science has won power over the universe of matter by breaking down
and down, by numbering and measuring. So at last everything that cannot be broken
down, numbered and measured must be deemed not to exist. Science is uniting man with
the sun in a totality of energy and matter. That is communion at the lowest level of
being. But we have always been right to seek it also at the highest.
The Sun of Intellect shining fierce and alone overhead will make the whole globe a
Golgotha. Forms of religious expression, like art, are means towards harmonizing the
dark and light within each one of us–those terrible forces, potent as the atom, that are
driving us to destruction. We have to find this means of letting light into the dark places,
and darkness to temper the light. The late Roman Empire gave birth to Christianity. Will
our own world, which so poignantly resembles it, have life and strength for another labour?
It seems that a new religion must exalt the Sun of Life more successfully than
Christianity has ever succeeded in doing. It is some proof of our need that the man who
has proclaimed 'a reverence for life' as his creed has come to be accepted as a saint of the
modern world. The morality of the new religion cannot be of the prohibitive,
life-denying kind which may, alas, only serve to strengthen the inner forces of darkness,
our sense of 'the enemy', but a no less strenuous positive morality directed towards
creative love in all its manifestations. It must respect the chicken crying for life within the
shell equally with the light of thought within the skull. Akhenaten in his gardens by the
Nile had a vision of what might be, but it was too soon. If we cannot move nearer to this
vision now, it will be too late.
I have a hesitant conviction that the young are already moving towards these new
forms, infected though they are with our own corruption. I often look at them with
distaste and with a great hope. They are stripped down to bare bones of truth and
acceptance which could soon be reclothed from head to foot. Many of the attitudes
which the older generations delight in censuring (because, like the Inquisition, we are
afraid) may well mark stumbling advances towards a better morality.
Meanwhile the sun shines upon us all in turn, the black and the white, the peoples of
the East and the peoples of the West.
There is just a chance that it may awaken us to a Good Morning.

Jacquetta Hawkes, Man and the Sun, Cressett Press, London 1962:239-241.

Spirasolaris.ca

SUN OF INTELLECT
The conclusion to Man and the Sun
by Jacquetta Hawkes (1962)
Chapter 10: Sun of Intellect
During the autumn
-2-
taught love of one enemy by raising no murmur against a holocaust of hate.) If we cannot
find god in the world, we lose H

You might also like