Overview of Non-Banking Financial Institutions
Overview of Non-Banking Financial Institutions
INSTITUTIONS (NBFC)
CA Rajkumar S. Adukia
B. Com. (Hons.), FCA, ACS, AICWA, LL.B, Dip.IFR (UK),DIPR, DLL&LP, MBA
Mobile +91 98200 61049/+91 93230 61049
Fax +91 22 26765579
Email [email protected]
Web: www.caaa.in
To receive regular updates on various professional issues kindly send test mail
to [email protected]
1
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Non Banking Financial Institutions (NBFIs) and International Regulatory
System
3. Emergence of NBFCs - Indian Historical Perspective
4. Non- Banking Financial Company- Meaning
5. Pre-requisites for carrying on business of NBFC
6. Regulatory Framework for NBFCs in India
7. Acceptance of Public Deposits
8. Submission of Returns
9. Anti Money Laundering Standards
10. Fair Practices Code
11. Monitoring of Frauds
12. Corporate Governance
13. Foreign Exchange investment in NBFCs
14. Overseas Investments by NBFCs
15. Working Group on the Issues and Concerns in the NBFC Sector
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2
The word system, in the term financial system, implies a set of complex and
closely connected or inter-linked Institutions, agents, practices, markets,
transactions, claims, and liabilities in the economy.
And NBFCs can be further classified into different types depending on their
nature of business.
Further, total Finance sector in India may be classified into Formal and Informal
Finance.
The informal sector of finance may be said to refer to all economic activities that
fall outside the formal sector that is regulated by economic and legal institutions
e.g money lenders, some channels of micro finance and the other not necessarily
regulated sectors. Landlords, local shopkeepers, traders, suppliers and
professional money lenders, and relatives are the informal sources of micro-
finance for the poor, both in rural and urban areas.
The Formal sector can be said to comprise of the Formal and necessarily
regulated channels of financing like, finance provided by Banks, Financial
Institutions, Non-Banking Financial Institutions, and Micro finance institutions.
3
2.0 NON BANKING FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL
REGULATORY SYSTEM
These non-banks financial institutions provide services that are not necessarily
suited to banks, serve as competition to banks, and specialize in sectors or
groups. Having a multi-faceted financial system, which includes non-bank
financial institutions, can protect economies from financial shocks. However, in
developing countries that lack a coherent policy framework and effective
regulations, non-bank financial institutions can exacerbate the fragility of the
financial system.
To summarize:
NBFIs have much to contribute, but they also bring some risks;
Those risks are best contained by sound regulation that seeks to create a
generally level playing field, without stifling either the growth or
individuality of NBFIs;
These objectives notwithstanding, NBFI regulation is generally
underdeveloped throughout most of the world;
The three areas in which improvements are most needed are:
1. In the legal powers granted to NBFI regulators
2. In the prudential standards, regulations and rules which, in general,
need to become more risk-based to catch up with banking standards;
3. In the internal practices and processes of regulators where there is a
general need for stronger governance standards and for a greater
commitment to enforcement among prudential regulators and conduct
regulators alike.
4
Any institution which is not a bank but is involved in finance
Financial institutions not taking demand deposits
Financial institutions not taking any deposit
NBFIs are different types of financial institutions that provide the following
types of services:
Payments
Liquidity / credit
Divisibility: break up large denomination and aggregate small
denomination
Store of value
Information: processing and assessing risks
Risk pooling: lower the risks of investors
Many NBFI provide services that are also provided by banks, hence the
distinction between banks and NBFI has become blurred. Many NBFI belong to
supervised conglomerates (or conglomerates that should be supervised).
Types of NBFIs
Financial institutions, including banks and non-banks, provide some or all of the
following core financial services. These services are often provided in
combinations:
5
widely accepted in exchange and must be linked to the arrangements for
ultimate settlement of value.
2. Liquidity is the ease with which an asset‘s full market value can be realized
once a decision to sell has been made. Financial institutions enhance liquidity
through specialization and scale.
6. Risk pooling is the extent to which an asset spreads the default risk of the
underlying promises by pooling. By pooling assets, financial institutions have
much more scope to risk pool than do individuals.
Banks provide an attractive bundle of most of the core financial services in their
deposit product:
Ability to write cheques on deposits means that banks offer payments
services and liquidity equal to that of currency.
Deposits also offer exceptionally high divisibility (at least to the same level
as currency).
The store of value service is that of a debt promise in that deposits
promise repayment at (nominal) face value plus interest.
Banks resolve the information conflict faced by borrowers and generally
enjoy substantial economies of scale in processing and analyzing
information.
Finally, banks risk pool borrowers‘ promises into a single promise by the
intermediary itself.
Banks offer all of the services that NBFIs offer, then why do we Need NBFIs? The
Answer to this question emerges if we analyse the differences between Banks
and NBFIs.
6
Difference between Banks and NBFIs in India:
NBFCs are doing functions akin to that of banks, however there are a few
differences:
In Southern Technologies limited vs JCIT, on 11th January 2010, the Supreme Court
held that the business operations of NBFCs and banks are quite different. “NBFCs accept
deposits from the public for which transparency is the key; hence, we have RBI
directions/norms. On the other hand, for banks, weightage must be placed on liquidity.
These two concepts, namely, risk and liquidity bring out the basic difference between
NBFCs and banks”, the Bench added.
1. Inefficiency of Banks
In principle, there is no reason why banks can‘t provide all services – indeed to
an extent they do. However they are extremely inefficient in providing some
services and even face conflicting incentives in providing all services.
In short, the way in which banks provide their core services means that they
cannot provide all services equally efficiently.
In order to provide certainty of value for payments, bank deposits must be low
risk. This limits the range and nature of assets that banks can hold on the asset
side of their balance sheets and thereby the extent to which they can offer risk
pooling. It also limits their ability to offer a wide range of store of value services,
especially equity type stores of value services.
More generally, NBFIs play a range of roles that are not suitable to banks:
through the enhancement of equity promises (adding liquidity,
divisibility, informational efficiencies and risk pooling services), NBFIs
broaden the spectrum of risks available to investors;
in this way they encourage investment and savings and improve the
efficiency of investment and savings;
7
through the provision of contingent promises they foster a risk
management culture by encouraging those who are least able to bear risk
to sell those risks to those better able to manage them; and
they can enhance the resilience of the financial system to economic shocks
NBFIs complement banks by providing services that are not well suited to banks;
they fill the gaps in financial services that otherwise occur in bank-based
financial systems.
3. Economic Development
In the first place, banks offer assets (deposits) that claim to be capital certain. If
this promise is to be honored, then there must be limits to the range and nature
of assets that a bank can reasonably take on to its balance sheets.
Notwithstanding the existence of universal banking in many parts of the world
(i.e., banks also engaged in securities market activities), this consideration
implies that bank-based financial system will tend to have a smaller range of
equity-type assets than those with a more broadly based structure including a
wide range of NBFIs. More generally, NBFIs play range of roles that are not
suitable for banks and through their provision of liquidity, divisibility,
informational efficiencies, and risk pooling services, they broaden the spectrum
of risks available to investors. In this way, they encourage and improve the
efficiency of investment and savings. Through the provision of a broader range
of financial instruments, they are able to foster a risk management culture by
attracting customers who are least able to bear risks and fill the gaps in financial
services that otherwise occur in bank-based financial systems.
8
4. Financial Stability
As Alan Greenspan (1999) pointed out, the impact of the currency crisis in
Thailand might have been significantly less severe if some of the risks borne by
the Thai banks had instead been borne by the capital markets.
While NBFIs can contribute to the economy, they also bring risks and the only
way to contol these risks is through proper regulation. Risk will vary depending
upon the economic functions performed by NBFIs.
The challenge for regulation is striking the right balance between the risks and
benefits.
On the one hand, too little or no regulation can lead to crisis and severely impact
the vulnerable and the economy. This has been a major attribute to the Asian
crisis in the late 90s – finance companies in Thailand and merchant banks in
Korea. On the other hand, too strict or inappropriate regulation can hinder
innovation and development. The call for ‗deregulation‘ in developed economies
reflects this.
Getting the right balance is a perpetual challenge for financial regulators and
supervisors, not only in the developing countries, but also in developed and
advanced economies.
9
1. To Prevent Systemic Risk
A systemic problem can be said to arise when a failure of one institution creates
large social costs (contagion, generalized panic, interruption of the payments
system, etc):
The essence of systemic risk is therefore the correlation of losses. For example, if
one bank goes bankrupt and sells all its assets, the drop in asset prices may
induce liquidity problems of other banks, leading to a general banking panic.
Regulation of NBFIs to prevent systemic risk is necessary because NBFIs tend not
to adequately internalize systemic risks.
This effect has been clearest where NBFIs have been either totally or largely
unregulated and have thereby gained a competitive advantage in competing
with regulated banks on their own territory.
The fallout from this type of behaviour was widely experienced in the Asian
region in the late 1990s.
In Thailand, finance companies issued high-yielding promissory notes
and borrowed offshore, then loaned the funds in local currency to high-
risk borrowers who could not meet banking standards – when the crisis
hit in mid 1997, the Government was forced to close 69 insolvent finance
companies;
Malaysia experienced similar problems with finance companies that had
extended hire -purchase loans;
10
In Korea, NBFIs grew very strongly in the pre-97 period precisely because
they competed directly with banks, but with a regulatory advantage. The
problem re -emerged in a different guise between ‗97 and ‗99 when poorly
regulated Investment Trust Companies took over as the primary source of
corporate finance.
China has also had problems associated with Investment Trust
Companies.
To prevent regulatory arbitrage between banks and NBFIs there is a need to have
a coherent regulatory framework that covers the whole of the financial system
and which regulates similar risks in similar ways – regardless of which
institutions offer the particular services.
3. Conglomerate Contamination
A major risk with NBFIs arises from their association with banks through
conglomerates.
While many countries have quite sound regulatory frameworks for supervising
banks, very few have either the legal power or the policy framework for
adequately supervising conglomerate groups in which banks own and operate
large non-bank subsidiaries.
This problem was also a contributor to the crisis in the late 1990s, most
particularly in Korea and Indonesia. But the problem is by no means confined to
emerging markets. Australia has lost only two banks through outright failure in
the past century. Both failed because of high-risk activities carried out through
their unregulated and very large subsidiaries.
11
4. To Protect consumers against market misconduct
This is one of the primary reasons for NBFI supervision and regulation – that
depositors are protected against the NBFIs failure to repay.
In a perfect market, we would expect individual depositors, policy holders and
investors to have information based on which they can assess the institutions
before they enter into any deals. The reality is information is not always reliable
and customers lack expertise to analyse the information to determine the value of
promises made to them by financial institutions. The regulator‘s role is to ensure
that those promises are reasonable, understandable and adequately backed by
capital reserves.
To protect the consumers, the regulators need to lay down certain Rules of
Conduct for the NBFIs which will help to prevent insider trading, conflict of
interest, false advertisement etc. For this purpose the Regulators generally have
certain norms like:
Certain Entry restrictions like licensing etc.
Disclosure of information
Financial strength (minimum capital etc.)
Governance of the NBFIs (responsibilities etc.)
Rules for conduct of business
In economics and contract theory, information asymmetry deals with the study
of decisions in transactions where one party has more or better information than
the other. This creates an imbalance of power in transactions which can
sometimes cause the transactions to go awry. Information asymmetry models
12
assume that at least one party to a transaction has relevant information whereas
the other(s) do not.
7. Social objectives
The structure of the regulator can and does take different forms in different
jurisdictions. A recent trend has been a shift towards more integrated
supervision with banking, insurance and capital market regulation being
brought within one organisation.
13
1. United Kingdom :
Financial Services Authority (FSA)
FSA is the Regulator of all providers of financial services in the UK
However, Bank of England retains responsibility for systemic risk.
2. Australia:
Twin regulators
3. Singapore:
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
MAS covers both prudential supervision of the banking and insurance sectors,
capital market regulation and business conduct regulation across the financial
system.
4. United States:
14
5. India:
Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
6. Mauritius:
Financial Services Commission (FSC).
7. Malaysia:
Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), the Central Bank
8. Bangladesh:
Bangladesh Bank (the Central Bank)
9. Phillipines:
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)
15
NBFCs had to rely excessively on unsecured public deposits for their existence /
survival by paying higher rate of interest. To service such high cost deposits,
some NBFCs were forced to deploy their funds which carried high return
coupled with high risk . This ultimately resulted in higher risks for their
depositors, which in some cases had culminated in the crisis of confidence and
credibility.
The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 was amended on 1st December, 1964 by the
Reserve Bank Amendment Act, 1963 to include provisions relating to non-
banking institutions receiving deposits and financial institutions. It was observed
that the existing legislative and regulatory framework required further
refinement and improvement because of the rising number of defaulting NBFCs
and the need for an efficient and quick system for redressal of grievances of
individual depositors.
Also, it was felt necessary to initiate immediate action for the protection of
depositors‘ interest. RBI issued the Non Banking Companies (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 1977, guidelines on prudential norms and various other Directions
and clarifications, from time to time for governing the activities of NBFCs.
Central Government, during 1974, introduced 58A in the Companies Act, 1956
which empowered Central Government to regulate acceptance and renewal of
deposits and to frame rules in consultation with Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
prescribing (a) the limit up to, (b) the manner and (c) the conditions subject to
which deposits may be invited or accepted / renewed by companies.The Central
Government in consultation with RBI framed Companies (Acceptance of
Deposits) Rules, 1975.
Given the need for continued existence and growth of NBFCs, the need to
develop a framework of prudential legislations and a supervisory system was
felt especially to encourage the growth of healthy NBFCs and weed out the
inefficient ones. Continuing this process, RBI Act, 1934 was amended in 1997
which authorised the Reserve Bank to determine policies, and issue directions to
NBFCs regarding income recognition, accounting standards, NPAs, capital
adequacy, etc. The amended Act, inter alia, provided for compulsory registration
of all NBFCs into three broad categories, viz., (i) NBFCs accepting public deposit;
(ii) NBFCs not accepting/holding public deposit; and (iii) core investment
companies (i.e., those acquiring shares/securities of their group/holding/
subsidiary companies to the extent of not less than 90 per cent of total assets and
which do not accept public deposit).
Until some years back, the prudential norms applicable to banking and non-
banking financial companies were not uniform. Moreover, within the NBFC
group, the prudential norms applicable to deposit taking NBFCs (NBFCs-D)
16
were more stringent than those for non-deposit taking NBFCs (NBFCs-ND). The
absence of capital adequacy requirements resulted in high leverage by the
NBFCs. Since 2000 however, the Reserve Bank has initiated measures to reduce
the scope of ‗regulatory arbitrage‘ between banks, NBFCs-D and NBFCs-ND.
Various committees were formed in India to review the existing framework and
address the shortcomings. Some of the committees and its recommendations are
given hereunder:
This committee was formed to examine all aspects relating to the structure, organization
& functioning of the financial system. It also recommended that the supervision of these
institutions should be brought within the purview of the agency to be set up for the
purpose under the aegis of the RBI. This led to the amendment of the RBI Act in 1997.
The RBI Amendment Act 1997 introduced compulsory registration with the RBI of all
17
existing and newly incorporated NBFCs and prescribed certain minimum capital
requirements as basic entry norms for a company to be able to operate as an NBFC.
The Working Group on Financial Companies constituted in April 1992 i.e the
Shah Committee set out the agenda for reforms in the NBFC sector. This
committee made wide ranging recommendations covering, inter-alia entry point
norms, compulsory registration of large sized NBFCs, prescription of prudential
norms for NBFCs on the lines of banks, stipulation of credit rating for acceptance
of public deposits and more statutory powers to Reserve Bank for better
regulation of NBFCs.
18
vi. Introduction of a system whereby the names of the NBFCs which had not
complied with the regulatory framework / directions of the Bank or had
failed to submit the prescribed returns consecutively for two years could
be published in regional newspapers.
This committee emphasised the need for strengthening of the NBFC sector
including entry norms and prudential norms, and dealt with framework for
acceptance of public deposits, issues concerning unincorporated financial
intermediaries and addresses issues of supervision of NBFCs.
19
ix. A separate instrumentality for regulation and supervision of NBFCs
under the aegis of the RBI should be set up, so that there is a great focus in
regulation and supervision of the NBFC sector.
x. The Committee felt it was not judicious to introduce a deposit insurance
scheme for the depositors in NBFCs because of the moral hazard issues,
likelihood of assets stripping and likely negative impact on the growth of
a healthy NBFC sector.
xi. Reserve Bank could use the services of chartered accountants with suitable
experience and capabilities to carry out inspection of the smaller NBFCs.
Although the terms Non Banking Financial Institution (NBFI) and Non Banking
Financial Company (NBFC) is generally used interchangeably in India and when
referring to each the meaning implied is the same, however technically there lies
a difference in the as the terms have been defined in specific terms in the Reserve
Bank of India Act (RBI Act) 1934 and hence the necessity for a separate chapter
on the subject.
NBFC is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and desirous of
commencing business of non-banking financial institution as defined under
Section 45 I(a) of the RBI Act, 1934 which should have a minimum net owned
fund of Rs 200 lakh w.e.f April 21, 1999.
20
‗NBFC‘, is defined under sec. 45-I(f) of the Act, as under "non-banking financial
company" means-
(i) a financial institution which is a company;
(ii) a non banking institution which is a company and which has as its principal
business the receiving of deposits, under any scheme or arrangement or in any
other manner, or lending in any manner;
(iii) such other non-banking institution or class of such institutions, as the bank
may, with the previous approval of the Central Government and by notification
in the Official Gazette, specify.
For this purpose, the definition of ‗Principal Business‘ given, vide Press Release
1998-99/1269 dated April 8, 1999 may be followed:
―The company will be treated as a non-banking financial company (NBFC) if its
financial assets are more than 50 per cent of its total assets (netted off by
intangible assets) and income from financial assets is more than 50 per cent of the
gross income. Both these tests are required to be satisfied as the determinant
factor for principal business of a company.‖
Definitions of NBFC
Whereas the ‗Reserve bank of India Act 1934‘ itself defines the term NBFC, there
is a different definition of the same term viz. NBFC in the ‗Non-Banking
Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions,
1988‘ that the RBI itself has issued under the aforesaid Act of 1934.
Under section 45-I(a) of the RBI Act,1934 ‗business of non banking financial
institution ‘, is defined in terms of the business of a financial institution and
NBFC.
NBFI
FI
21
"financial institution" means any non-banking institution which carries on as its
business or part of its business any of the following activities, namely :-
(i) the financing, whether by way of making loans or advances or otherwise, of
any activity other than its own;
(ii) the acquisition of shares, stock, bonds, debentures or securities issued by a
government or local authority or other marketable securities of a like nature;
(iii) letting or delivering of any goods to a hirer under a hire-purchase agreement
as defined in clause (c) of section 2 of the Hire-Purchase Act, 1972 (26 of 1972);
(iv) the carrying on of any class of insurance business;
(v) managing, conducting or supervising, as foreman, agent or in any other
capacity, of chits or kuries as defined in any law which is for the time being in
force in any State, or any business, which is similar thereto;
(vi) collecting, for any purpose or under any scheme or arrangement by
whatever name called monies in lump sum or otherwise, by way of subscriptions
or by sale of units, or other instruments or in any other manner and awarding
prizes or gifts, whether in cash or kind, or disbursing monies in any other way,
to persons from whom monies are collected or to any other person, but does not
include--------------------------------------------------------------.‖
NBI has been defined under the RBI Act 1934 as follows:
NBI
Sec.45-I(e) : "non-banking institution" means a company, corporation or co-
operative society.
NBFC
22
50 per cent of its total assets (netted off by intangible assets) and income from
financial assets is more than 50 per cent of the gross income. Both these tests are
required to be satisfied as the determinant factor for principal business of a
company.‖
On reading jointly both of the definitions of FI and NBI reveals that for a
company to be an NBFC it should either carry on any of the businesses as
enumerated in (i) to (vi) of FI Sec. 45-I(c) or it should otherwise receive public
deposits in any manner.
NBFC
Para 2(1) (xi) of the Directions defines NBFC as -
Non-banking financial company means only the non-banking institution which
is a loan company or an investment company or an asset finance company (w.e.f
6.12.2006) or a mutual benefit financial company.
The terms used in the above definition are also defined in the Directions, as
under:
23
Asset Finance Company means any company which is a financial institution
carrying on as its principal business the financing of physical assets supporting
productive / economic activity, such as automobiles, tractors, lathe machines,
generator sets, earth moving and material handling equipments, moving on own
power and general purpose industrial machines.
Each category of above notified companies is an NBFC for the Directions. As per
the definition given in the directions, these companies are a ‗financial
institution‘. However, the directions do not define financial institution.
Therefore ‗financial institution‘ mentioned under imports its meaning from the
definition in section 45-I(c) of the RBI Act. This is consequent to Para 2(2) of the
directions.
Thus, NBFC‘s under the Reserve Bank of India Directions are a subset of the
NBFC‘s under the Reserve Bank of India Act.
Classification of NBFCs
24
Regulatory and Development Authority. Other than the fact that all these come
under the category of "non-banks,'' there are not many common features.
During 2011-12, two new categories of NBFCs, viz., Infrastructure Debt Funds –
NBFC (NBFC-IDF) and Micro Finance Institution (NBFC-MFI) – were created
and brought under separate regulatory framework. In addition, a new category
of NBFC-Factors was introduced in September 2012. Earlier in April 2010, a
regulatory framework for Systemically Important Core Investment Companies
(CIC NDSI) was created for companies with an asset size of `1 billion and above,
whose business is investment for the sole purpose of holding stakes in group
concerns, are not trading in these securities and are accepting public funds.
Prudential requirements in the form of Adjusted Net Worth and leverage were
also prescribed for CIC-ND-SIs as they were given exemption from NOF, capital
adequacy and exposure norms.
25
financial inclusion, the Micro-Finance Institutions (Development and Regulation)
Bill, 2012 was introduced in the Lok Sabha on May 22, 2012.
2. NBFCs are classified into two categories, based on the liability structure, viz.:
Category ‗A‘ companies (NBFCs accepting public deposits or NBFCs-D);
Category ‗B‘ companies (NBFCs not raising public deposits or NBFCs-
ND).
International Monetary Fund has framed principles for regulation of the financial
sector, where it suggests that institutions performing similar functions should be
subject to similar regulations. Accordingly, All NBFCs–ND with an asset size of
Rs.100 crore and more as per the last audited balance sheet are now considered
as systemically important NBFCs–ND (NBFC-ND-SI). NBFCs–ND– SI are
required to maintain a minimum CRAR of 10 per cent. No NBFC–ND–SI is
allowed to (i) lend to any single borrower/group of borrowers exceeding 15 per
cent / 25 per cent of its owned fund; (ii) invest in the shares of another
company/ single group of companies exceeding 15 per cent / 25 per cent of its
owned fund; and (iii) lend and invest (loans/investments taken together)
exceeding 25 per cent of its owned fund to a single party and 40 per cent of its
owned fund to a single group of parties.
This classification is in addition to the present classification of NBFCs into
deposit-taking, and non-deposit-taking NBFCs. [RBI on Financial Regulation of
Systemically Important NBFCs and Banks‘ Relationship with them- dated
12.12.2006]
26
3. Residuary non-banking companies (RNBCs)
At end-March 2012, there were two RNBCs, registered with the Reserve Bank.
One each is located in central and eastern regions. Both the RNBCs are in the
process of migrating to other business models and have been directed to reduce
their deposit liabilities to ‗nil‘ by 2015
27
6. Housing finance companies.
7. Insurance companies
Insurance Companies are regulated by the Insurance Regulatory and
Development Authority.
Companies holding or accepting public deposits are required to comply with all
the directions on acceptance of public deposits, prudential norms and liquid
assets, and should submit periodic returns to the Reserve Bank. They are
supervised using all the supervisory tools indicated above.
28
classification and provisioning against bad and doubtful debts. They are less
frequently inspected. Such companies are now required to submit a monthly
return to the Reserve Bank.
1. Registration Requirement
In terms of Section 45-IA of the RBI Act, 1934, it is mandatory that every NBFC
should be registered with RBI to commence or carry on any business of non-
banking financial institution as defined in clause (a) of Section 45 I of the RBI Act,
1934.
29
An indicative list of documents/information to be furnished along with the application.
All documents/information is to be submitted in duplicate.
1. Minimum NOF requirement Rs. 200 lakh.
Application to be submitted in two separate sets tied up properly in two
2.
separate files.
Annex II to the Application Form to be submitted duly signed by the
3.
director/Authorized signatory and certified by the statutory auditors.
Annex III (directors‘ profile) to the Application Form to be separately
filled up for each director. Care should be taken to give details of bankers
4.
in respect of firms/companies/entities in which directors have
substantial interest.
In case the directors are associated or have substantial interest in other
5. companies, indicate clearly the activity of the companies (whether NBFC
or not).
Board Resolution specifically approving the submission of the
6.
application and its contents and authorising signatory.
Board Resolution to the effect that the company has not accepted any
public deposit, in the past (specify period)/does not hold any public
7.
deposit as on the date and will not accept the same in future without the
prior approval of Reserve Bank of India in writing.
Board resolution stating that the company is not carrying on any NBFC
8. activity/stopped NBFC activity and will not carry on/commence the
same before getting registration from RBI.
Auditors Certificate certifying that the company is/does not accept/is
9.
not holding Public Deposit.
Auditors Certificate certifying that the company is not carrying on any
10.
NBFC activity.
11. Net owned fund as on date.
Certifying compliance with section 45S of Chapter IIIC of the RBI Act,
12.
1934 in which director/s of the company has substantial interest.
Details of changes in the Memorandum and Articles of Association duly
13.
certified.
Last three years Audited balance sheet along with directors & auditors
14.
report.
15. Details of clauses in the memorandum relating to financial business.
Details of change in the management of the company during last
16.
financial year till date if any and reasons thereof.
17. Details of acquisitions, mergers of other companies if any together with
30
supporting documents.
Details of group companies/associate concerns/subsidiaries/holding
18.
companies.
Details of infusion of capital if any during last financial year together
19.
with the copy of return of allotment filed with Registrar of Companies.
Details of the bank balances/bank accounts/complete postal address of
20.
the branch/bank, loan/credit facilities etc. availed.
Business plan for next three years indicating market segment to be
21.
covered without any element of public deposits.
Cash flow statement, asset/income pattern statement for next three
22.
years.
Brief background note on the activities of the company during the last
23.
three years and the reasons for applying for NBFC registration.
II(b) is the company engaged in any capital market activity? If so,
24. whether there has been any non-compliance with SEBI Regulations?
(Statement to be certified by Auditors).
Whether any prohibitory order was issued in the past to the company or
25. any other NBFC/RNBC with which the directors/promoters etc. were
associated? If yes, details there of.
Whether the company or any of its directors was/is involved in any
26. criminal case, including under section 138(1) of the Negotiable
Instruments Act? If yes, details thereof.
Whether the company was granted any permission by ECD to function
27.
as Full-fledged Money Changers?
Whether the company was/is authorised by ECD to accept deposits from
28.
NRIs.
29. Whether ―Fit and Proper‖ Norms for Directors have been fulfilled.
31
regulated by National Housing Bank.
32
(xii) Core Investment Companies - The provisions of section 45-IA of the Act
shall not apply to a non-banking financial company being a Core Investment
Company referred to in the Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2011, which is not a Systemically Important Core Investment
Company, as defined in clause (h) of sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 3 of the
Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2011. The provisions of
section 45-IA (1)(b) of the Act also shall not apply subject to the condition that it
meets with the capital requirements and leverage ratio as specified in the said
directions. The Non-Banking Financial (Non- Deposit Accepting or Holding)
Companies Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2007" shall also not
apply to a non-banking financial company being a Core Investment Company
referred to in the Core Investment Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2011
(hereinafter referred to as CIC Directions), which is not a systemically important
Core Investment Company as defined in clause (h) of sub-paragraph (1) of
paragraph 3 of the CIC Directions.‖ The provisions of paragraphs 15, 16 and 18
of these Directions shall not apply to a Systemically Important Core Investment
Company as defined in the CIC Directions, subject to the condition that it
submits the Annual Auditors Certificate and meets with the capital requirements
and leverage ratio, as specified in the CIC Directions".
The list of registered NBFCs is available on the web site of Reserve Bank of India
and can be viewed at www.rbi.org.in
33
Net Owned Fund is defined in the Explanation to Section 45-IA of the RBI Act
1934 as follows
(a) The aggregate of the paid-up equity capital and free reserves as disclosed in
the latest balance sheet of the company after deducting therefrom-
(2) The book value of debentures, bonds, outstanding loans and advances
(including hire-purchase and lease finance) made to, and deposits with-
to the extent such amount exceeds ten per cent, of (a) above
All NBFCs, being companies registered under the Companies Act, have to fulfill
compliance relating to the Board of Directors, Share Capital, Management
Structure, Audits, Meetings, maintenance as well as publication of books of
accounts and general conduct as per the requirements of the Companies Act
1956.
34
In addition, they have to fulfill the specific requirements of the Reserve Bank of
India (RBI) as set out in the Directions and various notifications and amendments
by the RBI. The RBI also prescribes a set of compliance norms for all NBFCs. The
Prudential Norms for NBFCs accepting public deposits are more rigorous.
Various committees, which went into these aspects, strongly recommended that
there should be an appropriate regulatory framework over NBFCs and that more
powers should be vested with RBI to regulate NBFCs in a better manner.
Chapters III-B, III-C and V of the RBI Act were comprehensively amended in
January 1997 for vesting more powers with the RBI and providing, inter alia, for
35
minimum entry point norm, compulsory registration with the Reserve Bank of
all existing and newly incorporated NBFCs for carrying on and commencement
of financial business. RBI put in place in January 1998 a new regulatory
framework involving prescription of prudential norms for NBFCs, regulation of
deposit taking activity to ensure that the NBFCs function on sound and healthy
lines and strengthen the financial system of the country. Regulatory and
supervisory attention was focused on NBFCs -D which accept public deposits so
as to enable RBI to efficiently discharge its responsibilities to protect the interests
of the depositors. The process has helped in ensuring consolidation of NBFC
sector as a whole.
Further two sets of detailed directions on Prudential norms were issued by RBI
in 2007. The directions interalia, prescribe guidelines on income recognition,
asset classification and provisioning requirements applicable to NBFCs, exposure
norms, constitution of audit committee, disclosures in the balance sheet,
requirement of capital adequacy, restrictions on investments in land and
building and unquoted shares.
36
An Overview of Regulation of NBFCs (Concld.)
with the monetary policy Supervisory framework comprising
framework, so that their (a) on-site inspection (CAMELS
functioning does not lead to pattern)
systemic aberrations, (b) off-site Monitoring through
returns(c)
market intelligence And (d) Exception
reports by statutory auditors,,
* the quality of surveillance Punitive action like cancellation
and supervision exercised of Certificate of Registration
by the RBI over the NBFCs (CoR), prohibition
keeps pace with the developments from acceptance of deposits and
in this sector. alienation of assets, filing criminal
complaints and winding up petitions
in extreme cases, appointment of the
RBI observers in certain cases, etc.
* comprehensive regulation and Co-ordination with State Governments
supervision of Asset liability to curb unauthorised and fraudulent
and risk management activities, training programmes
system for NBFCs, for personnel of NBFCs, State
Governments and Police officials.
(2) Amendments to the (4) Other steps for protection of
Reserve Bank of India depositors‘ interest
(RBI) Act, 1934
RBI Act was amended Publicity for depositors‘ education
in January 1997 And awareness, workshops / seminars
providing for, inter alia. for trade and industry organisations,
depositors‘ associations,
chartered accountants, etc.
* Entry norms for NBFCs
and prohibition of deposit
acceptance (save to the
extent permitted under
the Act) by unincorporated
bodies engaged in financial business,
* Compulsory registration,
maintenance of liquid
assets and creation of reserve fund,
* Power of the RBI to issue
directions to an NBFC or to
the NBFCs in general
37
or to a class of NBFCs.
* Comprehensive regulation
and Supervision of deposit
taking NBFCs and limited
supervision over those not
accepting public deposits.
(source- www.rbi.org.in)
Governing Laws:
a. CHAPTER IIIB, III-C and V of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act 1934;
b. RBI Directions
45 I : Definitions
38
45JA: Power of RBI to determine Policy and issue Directions
45K: Power of RBI to collect information from NBI as to deposits and give
Directions
45N: Inspection
b. RBI Directions
39
iv. Non-Banking Financial Companies Auditor's Report (Reserve Bank)
Directions, 2008
40
8. Fair Practices Code
11. Allied activities- entry into insurance business, issue of credit card and
marketing and distribution of certain products
12. Frauds – Future approach towards monitoring of frauds in NBFCs
Nov 08, 2012 - Readiness of major service providers to migrate from IPv4
to IPv6
Nov 06, 2012 - Standardisation and Enhancement of Security Features in
Cheque Forms - Migrating to CTS 2010 Standards
41
May 11, 2012 -
42
Dec 30, 2011 -
43
Apr 05, 2011 - Operation of deposit account with NBFCs and money
mules
Mar 08, 2011 - Know Your Customer (KYC) norms /Anti-Money
Laundering (AML) standards/Combating of Financing of Terrorism (CFT)
Obligation of NBFCs under PMLA, 2002
Feb 17, 2011 - All Deposit Taking NBFCs - CRAR Fifteen percent w.e.f
March 31, 2012
Jan 28, 2011 - NBFCs/RNBCs - Anti- Money Laundering/Combating
Financing of Terrorism Standards
Jan 27, 2011 - Services to Persons with Disability - Training Programme for
Employees
Jan 17, 2011 - Provision of 0.25% for standard assets of NBFCs
Jan 05, 2011 - Regulatory Framework for Core Investment Companies
44
and ―public company‖
Section 4: Meaning of ―holding company‖ and ―subsidiary‖
Section 4A: Public Financial Institutions
Section 43A: Private Company to become public company in certain cases
Section 58A: Deposits not to be invited without issuing an advertisement
Section 58AA: Small Depositors
Section 58AAA: Default in acceptance or refund of deposits to be cognizable
Section 209(1): Books of Accounts to be kept by company
Section 217(1) : Director‘s Report
Section 227: Powers and Duties of Auditors
Section 252: Minimum Number of Directors
Section 292A: Audit Committee
Section 370(1B): Loans etc. to companies under the same management
Section 372 (11) : Purchase by company of shares etc. of other companies
Section 620A: Power to modify Act in its application to Nidhis etc.
Section 637A: Power of Central Government or Tribunal to accord approval etc.
subject to conditions and to prescribe fees on applications
4.Company‘s Rules
45
7. Housing Finance Companies
46
Salient features of the RBI regulatory framework
The Reserve Bank regulates and supervises NBFCs as defined in Chapter III B of
the RBI Act,1934. Accordingly, the Reserve Bank has issued a set of directions to
regulate the activities of NBFCs under its jurisdiction. Some features of the RBI
regulatory framework are as follows:
-Offer a rate of interest on deposits more than that approved by RBI from time to
time (current Interest Rate is 12.5%p.a)
-Accept deposit for a period less than 12 months and more than 60 months
-Offer any gifts/incentives to solicit deposits from public.
RNBCs should
47
-offer a rate of interest of not less than 5% per annum on term deposits and
3.5% on daily deposits, both compounded annually, under extant directions.
-RNBCs cannot accept deposits for a period less than 12 months and more
than 84 months.
-RNBCs cannot offer any gifts/incentives to solicit deposits from public
If a deposit taking NBFC fails to repay the deposit or the interest accrued
thereon in accordance with the terms and conditions of acceptance of such
deposit, redressal of grievance can be through,
- the Regional Bench of the Company Law Board at Chennai/ Delhi/
Kolkata/Mumbai
48
7.0 ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC DEPOSITS
All NBFCs are not entitled to accept public deposits. Only those NBFCs holding
a valid Certificate of Registration with authorisation to accept Public Deposits
can accept/hold public deposits. NBFCs authorised to accept/hold public
deposits besides having minimum stipulated Net Owned Fund (NOF) should
also comply with the Directions such as investing part of the funds in liquid
assets, maintain reserves, rating etc. issued by the Bank.
Public Deposit
The term ‗deposit‘ is defined under Section 45 I(bb) of the RBI Act, 1934.
‗Deposit‘ includes and shall be deemed always to have included any receipt of
money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form but does not include:
49
amount received from shareholders by private company;
amount received from directors or relative of the director of a NBFC;
amount raised by issue of bonds or debentures secured by mortgage of
any immovable property or other asset of the company subject to
conditions;
the amount brought in by the promoters by way of unsecured loan;
amount received from a mutual fund;
any amount received as hybrid debt or subordinated debt;
any amount received by issuance of Commercial Paper.
On and from January 31, 1998, no non-banking financial company having Net
Owned Fund (NOF) of twenty five lakh of rupees (Increased to Rs. 200 lakh) and
above shall accept public deposit unless it has obtained minimum investment
grade or other specified credit rating for fixed deposits from any one of the
approved credit rating agencies at least once a year and a copy of the rating is
sent to the Reserve Bank of India along with return on prudential norms.
However, this shall not apply to an Asset Finance Company.
In order to strengthen the financial system in general and deposit taking entities
in particular NBFCs accepting deposits should be adequately capitalized and at
the same time also have a uniform minimum NOF.
(a) As a first step, NBFCs having minimum NOF of less than Rs. 200 lakh may
freeze their deposits at the level currently held by them.
(b) Further, Asset Finance Companies (AFC) having minimum investment grade
credit rating and Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) of 12% may
50
bring down public deposits to a level that is 1.5 times their NOF while all other
companies may bring down their public deposits to a level equal to their NOF by
March 31, 2009.
(c) Those companies which are presently eligible to accept public deposits up to a
certain level, but have, for any reason, not accepted deposits up to that level will
be permitted to accept public deposits up to the revised ceiling prescribed
(d) Companies on attaining the NOF of Rs.200 lakh may submit statutory
auditor's certificate certifying its NOF.
(e) The NBFCs failing to achieve the prescribed ceiling within the stipulated time
period, may apply to the Reserve Bank for appropriate dispensation in this
regard which may be considered on case to case basis.
Credit Rating
No non-banking financial company having Net Owned Fund Two Hundred lakh
of rupees and above shall accept public deposit unless it has obtained minimum
investment grade or other specified credit rating for fixed deposits from any one
51
of the approved credit rating agencies at least once a year and a copy of the
rating is sent to the Reserve Bank of India along with return on prudential
norms.
An unrated NBFC, except certain Asset Finance companies (AFC), cannot accept
public deposits. An exception is made in case of unrated AFC companies with
CRAR of 15% which can accept public deposit up to 1.5 times of the NOF or Rs
10 crore whichever is lower without having a credit rating. A NBFC may get
itself rated by any of the five rating agencies namely, CRISIL, CARE, ICRA,
FITCH Ratings India Pvt. Ltd. and Brickwork Ratings India Pvt. Ltd.
The names of approved credit rating agencies and the minimum credit rating
shall be as follows:-
52
downgrading of credit rating, the amount of excess public deposit to nil or to the
appropriate extent permissible under paragraph 4(4) of Non-Banking Financial
Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits ( Reserve Bank) Directions, 1998;
however such NBFC can renew the matured public deposits subject to
repayment stipulations specified above and compliance with other conditions for
acceptance of deposits.
NBFCs also issue financial products like Commercial Paper, Debentures etc. to
which rating is assigned by rating agencies. The ratings assigned to such
products may undergo changes for various reasons ascribed to by the rating
agencies.
Therefore RBI vide Notification RBI /2008-09 /372 DNBS (PD) CC.
No.134/03.10.001 / 2008-2009 dated 4.02.2009, has clarified that all NBFCs (both
deposit taking and non-deposit taking) with asset size of Rs 100 crore and above
excluding RNBCs, shall furnish the information about downgrading / upgrading
of assigned rating of any financial product issued by them, within fifteen days of
such a change in rating, to the Regional Office of the Bank under whose
jurisdiction their registered office is functioning.
Period of Deposit
The NBFCs are allowed to accept/renew public deposits for a minimum period
of 12 months and maximum period of 60 months. The RNBCs have different
norms for acceptance of deposits.
NBFCs cannot offer interest rates higher than the ceiling rate prescribed by RBI
from time to time. The present ceiling is 12.5 per cent per annum (on and from
April 24, 2007. The interest may be paid or compounded at rests not shorter than
monthly rests. This is the maximum permissible rate an NBFC can pay on its
public deposits and they may offer lower rates.
53
Payment of brokerage
On and from January 31, 1998 no non-banking financial company shall pay to
any broker on public deposit collected by or through him, -
(i) brokerage, commission, incentive or any other benefit by whatever name
called, in excess of two per cent of the deposit so collected;and
(ii) expenses by way of reimbursement on the basis of relative vouchers/bills
produced by him, in excess of 0.5 percent of the deposit so collected.
54
(f) at the end of application form but before the signature of the depositor, the
following verification clause by the depositor should be appended:
―I have gone through the financials and other statements / particulars /
representations furnished / made by the company and after careful
consideration I am making the deposit with the company at my own risk and
volition‖.
(g) the information relating to and the aggregate dues from the facilities, both
fund and non-fund based, extended to, and the aggregate dues from companies
in the same group or other entities or business ventures in which the directors
and / or the non-banking financial company are holding substantial interest and
the total amount of exposure to such entities.
a. the actual rate of return by way of interest, premium, bonus other advantage
to the depositor;
b. the mode of repayment of deposit;
c. maturity period of deposit;
d. the interest payable on deposit;
e. the rate of interest which will be payable to the depositor in case the depositor
withdraws the deposit prematurely;
f. the terms and conditions subject to which a deposit will be renewed;
g. any other special features relating to the terms and conditions subject to which
the deposit is accepted/renewed;
h. the information, relating to the aggregate dues (including the non-fund
based facilities provided to) from companies in the same group or other
entities or business ventures in which, the directors and/or the NBFC are
holding substantial interest and the total amount of exposure to such entities;
and
i. that the deposits solicited by it are not insured.
Where an NBFC displays any advertisement in electronic media such as TV, even
without soliciting deposits, it should incorporate a caption/band in such
advertisements indicating the following:
55
As regards deposit taking activity of the company, the viewers may refer to the
advertisement in the newspaper/information furnished in the application form
for soliciting public deposits;
A statement delivered as outlined above shall be valid till the expiry of six
months from the date of closure of the financial year in which it is so delivered or
until the date on which the balance sheet is laid before the company in general
meeting or where the annual general meeting for any year has not been held, the
latest day on which that meeting should have been held in accordance with the
provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), whichever is earlier, and a
fresh statement shall be delivered after the expiry of the validity of the statement,
in each succeeding financial year before accepting public deposit in that financial
year.
The said receipt shall be duly signed by an officer entitled to act for the company
in this behalf and shall state the date of deposit, the name of the depositor, the
amount in words and figures received by the company by way of deposit, the
rate of interest payable thereon and the date on which the deposit is repayable.
56
Register of deposits
The register or registers aforesaid shall be kept at each branch in respect of the
deposit accounts opened by that branch of the company and a consolidated
register for all the branches taken together at the registered office of the company
and shall be preserved in good order for a period of not less than eight calendar
years following the financial year in which the latest entry is made of the
repayment or renewal of any deposit of which particulars are contained in the
register.
Provided that, if the company keeps the books of account referred to in sub-
section (1) of section 209 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) at any place other
than its registered office in accordance with the proviso to that sub-section, it
shall be deemed to be sufficient compliance with this clause if the register
aforesaid is kept at such other place, subject to the condition that the company
delivers to the Reserve Bank of India a copy of the notice filed with the Registrar
of Companies under the proviso to the said sub-section within seven days of
such filing.
In every report of the Board of Directors laid before the company in general
meeting under sub-section (1) of section 217 of the Companies Act, 1956 there
shall be included in the case of non-banking company, the following particulars
or information, namely:
57
(a) the total number of depositors of the company whose deposits have not been
claimed by the depositors or paid by the company after the date on which the
deposit became due for repayment or renewal; and
(b) the total amount due to the depositors and remaining unclaimed or unpaid
beyond the dates referred to as aforesaid.
(2) The said particulars or information shall be furnished with reference to the
position as on the last date of the financial year to which the report relates and if
the amounts remaining unclaimed or undisbursed as referred to above exceed in
the aggregate the sum of rupees five lakhs, there shall also be included in the
report a statement on the steps taken or proposed to be taken by the Board of
Directors for the repayment of the amounts due to the depositors and remaining
unclaimed or undisbursed.
58
a) Company Law Board (CLB) or / and
A depositor can approach any or all of these redressal authorities‘ i.e consumer
forum, court or CLB.
Relevant Forms as laid down in Company law Board Regulations, 1991 are:
Form 1 – Form of petition to company law board
Form 2- Interlocutory application
Form 3- Reference to Company Law Board
Form 4- Application By Depositor / Debenture Holder Under Section 58A(9) or
Section 117C(4) of the Act Or Section 45QA of The Reserve Bank Of India Act,
1934
The details of addresses and territorial jurisdiction of the bench officers of CLB
are as under:
59
Chennai 600 006. and Pondicherry
60
to the scheme approved by the court. The liquidator generally inserts
advertisement in the newspaper inviting claims from depositors/investors in
compliance with court orders. Therefore, the investors/depositors should file the
claims within due time as per such notices of the liquidator. The Reserve Bank
also provides assistance to the depositors in furnishing addresses of the official
liquidator.
c) No Ombudsmen
Net Rs 2 crore
Owned
Funds
61
Non Need to make provisions
Performing against non performing
Assets assets
3. Every NBFC shall separately disclose in its balance sheet the provisions made
as per paragraph 9 of the Directions without netting them from the income or
against the value of assets. [According to Para 9 - Every NBFC shall, after taking
into account the time lag between an account becoming non-performing, its
recognition as such, the realisation of the security and the erosion over time in
62
the value of security charged, make provision against sub-standard assets,
doubtful assets and loss assets as provided in the Paragraph]
4. A NBFC having assets of Rs. 50 crore and above as per its last audited balance
sheet shall constitute an Audit Committee, consisting of not less than 3 members
of its Board of Directors.
5. Every NBFC shall prepare its balance sheet and profit and loss account as on
March 31 every year. Where a NBFC intends to extend the date of its balance
sheet as per provisions of the Companies Act, it should take prior approval of the
RBI before approaching the Registrar of Companies for this purpose.
Further, even in cases where the Bank and the ROC grant extension of time, the
NBFC shall furnish to the Bank a proforma balance sheet (unaudited ) as on
March 31 of the year and the statutory returns due on the said date.
6. Every NBFC shall append to its balance sheet, the particulars in the schedule
as set out in Annex to the Directions.
Every NBFC shall submit a Certificate from its Statutory Auditor that it is
engaged in the business of NBFI requiring it to hold a Certificate of Registration
under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act.
A certificate from the Statutory Auditor in this regard with reference to the
position of the company as at end of the financial year ended March 31 may be
submitted to the Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision
under whose jurisdiction the non-banking financial company is registered, latest
by June 30, every year.
Such certificate shall also indicate the asset / income pattern of the NBFC for
making it eligible for classification as Asset Finance Company, Investment
Company or Loan Company.
63
(Such ratio shall not be less than fifteen percent by March 31, 2012 vide
Notification No. DNBS.224 / CGM(US)-2011 dated February 17, 2011) of its
aggregate risk weighted assets on balance sheet and of risk adjusted value of off-
balance sheet items. The total of Tier II capital, at any point of time, shall not
exceed one hundred per cent of Tier I capital.
With effect from June 30, 2011, all Non-banking financial companies, excluding
residuary non-banking companies referred to in paragraphs 1(3)(i)(a) and (b) of
the Non-Banking Financial (Deposit Accepting or Holding) Companies
Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2007, shall submit on line a
quarterly return within fifteen days of the expiry of the relative quarter as on
March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 every year, in the format
available on https://cosmos.rbi.org.in.‖
Every NBFC (incldg. RNBC) with total assets of Rs. 100 crore and above
according to the previous audited balance sheet, shall submit a monthly return
within a period of 7 days of the expiry of the month to which it pertains in the
format NBS 6 provided in Annex 3 to the Regional Office of the Department of
64
Non-Banking Supervision of the RBI as indicated in the Second Schedule to the
Non-Banking Financial Companies Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve
Bank) Directions, 1998 and Schedule B to the Residuary Non-Banking Companies
(Reserve Bank) Directions, 1987.
The following Sections in the Companies Act, 1956 relate to Public deposits
a) Sec 58A- Deposits not to be invited without issuing an advertisement
b) Sec 58AA- Small depositors
c) Sec 58AAA-Default in acceptance or refund of deposits to be cognizable
d) Sec 58B- Provisions relating to prospectus to apply to advertisement
The important provisions of the Act and the Rules are summarised as under:
1. The rules do not apply to banking companies and financial companies for
which RBI have separately prescribed rules.
2. Deposit means deposit of money and include any amount borrowed by a
company, but does not include certain types of borrowings; viz. amount
received:
i. From Government, Local Authority, Foreign Government or any other foreign
person, citizen or authority or any amount guaranteed by Government.
ii. From Banks.
iii. From various Government or semi-Government financial Cos. Or
Corporation/insurance Cos. Or a Public financial institution as may be notified
by the CG.
iv. From any other company.
v. By way of security deposit from an employee.
vi. By way of security or advance from any purchasing, selling or other agents in
the course of business or any advance received against orders for supply of
goods, properties or services.
vii. By way of subscription to any share, stock, bonds or debentures pending
allotment. Any amount received by way of calls in advance so long as this is not
repayable under the Articles.
viii. In trust or in transit.
ix. From a director in case of any company or from a shareholder in case of a
private company out of his own funds (that is not borrowed or accepted from
65
others) including a Company which has become public u/s.43A so long as it
retains S. 3(1)(iii) conditions in its Articles. The director/shareholder concerned
however has to furnish a declaration in writing to the effect that the amount is
not being given out of funds acquired by him by borrowing or accepting from
others.
x. By issue of bonds or debentures secured by the mortgage of any immovable
property or with an option to convert them into shares. Provided the amount
does not exceed the market value of property.
xi. From promoters by way of unsecured loans pursuant to agreement with
financial institutions for loans so long as such loans are outstanding.
3. Acceptance of deposits
a) No company shall accept or renew any deposit which is repayable on demand
or on notice or after a period of less than six months or more than thirty six
months from the date of acceptance or renewal of such deposit
b) No company shall invite or accept or renew any deposits in any form, on a
rate of interest exceeding 12.5 per cent per annum at rests which shall not be
shorter than monthly rests
c) No company shall pay brokerage to any broker at a rate, exceeding one per
cent of the deposits for a period up to one year, one and half per cent of the
deposits for a period of more than one year but up to two years, and two percent
of the deposits for a period exceeding two years collected by or through such
broker, and such payment shall be on one time basis.
d) No company with a net owned fund of less than rupees one crore shall invite
public deposits
e) Any person who is authorised by a company, in writing, to solicit deposits on
its behalf and through whom deposits are procured will only be entitled to
brokerage
66
8. The expression 'small depositor' means ''a depositor who has deposited (in a
financial year) a sum not exceeding twenty thousand rupees in a company and
includes his successors, nominees and legal representatives". In case of any
default by the company in paying back to them, it shall inform the Tribunal
within sixty days from the date of default. The Tribunal will then direct the
company to repay to small depositors within a period of thirty days from the
date of receipt of intimation of default. On failure to comply with the orders of
the Board, the company and its directors shall be punishable with imprisonment
and payment of daily fine during the period in which such non-compliance
continues. However, if such a defaulting company wants to invite deposits from
small depositors, it shall state the complete nature of default in all its future
advertisements and application form.
9. Section 58AAA, any default / contravention under sections 58A and 58AA,
relating to deposits, will be treated as a cognizable offence. In other words, under
this provision, the directors of the defaulting company can be arrested and put
behind bars. Incidentally, the courts will take cognizance only of the complaint
of the central government or any of its authorised officers.
NBFCs are required to submit various returns to RBI with respect to their deposit
acceptance, prudential norms compliance, etc.
A list of such returns to be submitted by NBFCs-D, NBFCs-ND-SI and others is
as under:
67
6. NBS-6 Monthly return on exposure to capital market by deposit taking NBFC
with total assets of Rs 100 crore and above
1. NBS-7 - A Quarterly statement of capital funds, risk weighted assets, risk asset
ratio etc., for NBFC-ND-SI
3. ALM returns:
Basic information like name of the company, address, NOF, profit / loss during
the last three years has to be submitted quarterly by non-deposit taking NBFCs
with asset size between Rs 50 crore and Rs 100 crore.
D. Other Returns
1. As at the end of March every year, all NBFCs are required to submit an annual
certificate duly certified by the Statutory Auditors that the company is engaged
in the business of NBFI requiring it to hold the CoR. The certificate shall also
68
indicate the asset / income pattern of the NBFC for making it eligible for
classification as AFC, Investment Company, or Loan Company.
2. An NBFC with FDI has to submit a half yearly (half year ending March and
September) certificate to the effect that it has complied with the minimum
capitalisation norms and that its activities are restricted to the activities
prescribed under FEMA.
69
Companies holding whose
Public Deposits (The application
return was for Certificate
subsequently of
simplified for better Registration
response) under Section
45-IA of
RBI Act,
1934 have
been rejected
5. Monthly Return on NBS6 Monthly As at the 7 days 7th day Details of NBFCs-D
Capital Market end of the of next Capital Market
Exposure month month Exposure
6. Quarterly Return of NBS7 Quarterly 31st March/ 15 days 15th Capital Funds, NBFCs-ND-
Capital Funds, Risk- 30th June/ April/ Risk Assets, SI
Asset Ratio from 30th Sept/ 15th Risk Weighted
NBFCs-ND-SI 31st Dec July/ off-balance sheet
(Supervisory Return) 15th items (Non-
Oct/ Funded
15th Jan Exposures),
Asset
Classification
etc.
7. Asset-Liability ALM Half yearly 31st March/ 1 month 30th Structural NBFCs-D
Management (ALM) 30th Sept April/ Liquidity, Short- having public
Return 30th Oct term dynamic deposit of Rs
liquidity, Interest 20 crore
Rate sensitivity and/or asset
etc. size of more
than Rs. 100
crore
8. A Statement of short ALM-1 Monthly As at end of 10 days 10th day Short-term NBFC-ND-SI
term dynamic liquidity the month of next dynamic
in format ALM -NBS- month liquidity
ALM1
9. Statement of structural ALM-2 Half yearly 31st March/ 20 days 20th Structural NBFC-ND-SI
liquidity in format 30th Sept April/ liquidity
ALM – NBS-ALM2 20th Oct
10. Statement of Interest ALM-3 Half yearly 31st March/ 20 days 20th Interest Rate NBFC-ND-SI
Rate Sensitivity in 30th Sept April/ sensitivity
format ALM-NBS- 20th Oct
ALM3.
11. Monthly Return on 100 Monthly end of every 7days 7th of Sources and NBFC-ND-SI
Important Financial Crore month next Application of
Parameters of NBFCs NBFCs- month Funds, Profit and
not accepting/holding ND-SI Loss Account,
70
public deposits and Asset
having asset size of Classification,
Rs.100 crore and above Bank's/FIs
exposure on the
company, Details
of Capital
Market
Exposure,
Foreign Sources
etc.
12. Quarterly return to be Quarterly. 31st March/ within a Basic
submitted by non- 30th June/ period of information like
deposit taking NBFCs 30th Sept/ one month name of the
with asset size of Rs 50 31st Dec from the company,
crore and above but close of the address. NOF,
less than Rs 100 crore, quarter profit / loss
during the last
three years
13. Quarterly Return to be Quarterly. 31st March/ within a Name of the All NBFCs
submitted by NBFCs 30th June/ period of WOS/JV,
having overseas 30th Sept/ one month
investment 31st Dec from the Country and
close of the date of
quarter incorporation
Date of NoC
from DNBS,
Business
undertaken
Note: NBFCs-D -> Deposit taking Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs);
NBFCs-ND -> Non-Deposit taking NBFCs.
NBFCs-ND-SI -> Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) not accepting/holding public deposits and having
asset sizes of Rs.100 crore and above (also termed as Systemically Important NBFCs or in short NBFCs-ND-SI)
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) is in force since 1st July
2005. Under PMLA certain exclusive and concurrent powers are conferred on the
Director, Financial Intelligence Unit, India (FIU-IND).
Financial Intelligence Unit – India (FIU-IND) was set by the Government of India
vide order dated 18th November 2004 as the central national agency responsible
for receiving, processing, analyzing and disseminating information relating to
71
suspect financial transactions. FIU-IND is an independent body reporting
directly to the Economic Intelligence Council (EIC) headed by the Finance
Minister.
Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, empowers the
Director, FIU-IND to impose fine on any banking company, financial institution
or intermediary for failure to comply with the obligations of maintenance of
records, furnishing information and verifying the identity of clients. The amount
of fine may vary from ten thousand rupees to one lakh rupees for each failure.
Section 12 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 lays down following
obligations on banking companies, financial institutions and intermediaries.
"12. (1) Every banking company, financial institution and intermediary shall -
(a) maintain a record of all transactions, the nature and value of which may be
prescribed, whether such transactions comprise of a single transaction or a series
of transactions integrally connected to each other, and where such series of
transactions take place within a month;
(c) verify and maintain the records of the identity of all its clients, in such a
manner as may be prescribed.
The ‗Know Your Customer‘ guidelines were issued in February 2005 revisiting
the earlier guidelines issued in January 2004 in the context of the
Recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Anti
Money Laundering (AML) standards and on Combating Financing of Terrorism
(CFT).
ii. As an extension of the KYC Guidelines, NBFCs should put in place a process
of due diligence in respect of persons authorised by NBFCs including
brokers/agents etc. collecting deposits on behalf of the company through a
uniform policy for appointment and detailed verification. Details of due
diligence conducted may be kept on record with the company for verification.
Compliance in this regard were to be reported to RBI by December 31, 2005.
73
In the depositors‘ interests and for enhancing transparency of operations, the
companies should have systems in place to ensure that the books of accounts of
persons authorised by NBFCs including brokers/agents etc, so far as they relate
to brokerage functions of the company, are available for audit and inspection
whenever required.
iii. All deposit receipts should bear the name and Registered Office address of
the NBFC and must invariably indicate the name of the persons authorised by
NBFCs including brokers/agents etc. and their addresses who mobilised the
deposit and the link office with the telephone number of such officer and/or
persons authorised by NBFCs including brokers/agents etc in order that there is
a clear indication of the identifiable contact with the field persons and matters
such as unclaimed / lapsed deposits, discontinued deposits, interest payments
and other customer grievances are appropriately addressed. The companies may
also evolve suitable review procedures to identify persons authorised by NBFCs
including brokers/agents etc. in whose cases the incidence of discontinued
deposits is high for taking suitable action.
iv. It was clarified in March 2006 that although flexibility in the requirement of
documents of identity and proof of address has been provided in the circular
mentioned above yet there may be instances where certain persons, especially,
those belonging to low income group both in urban and rural areas may not be
able to produce such documents to satisfy the NBFC about their identity and
address. Hence, it has been decided to further simplify the KYC procedure for
opening accounts by NBFCs for those persons who intend to keep balances not
exceeding rupees fifty thousand (Rs. 50,000/-) in all their accounts taken together
and the total credit in all the accounts taken together is not expected to exceed
rupees one lakh (Rs. 1,00,000/-) in a year.
a) introduction from another account holder who has been subjected to full KYC
procedure. The introducer‘s account with the NBFC should be at least six month
old and should show satisfactory transactions. Photograph of the customer who
proposes to open the account and also his address needs to be certified by the
introducer, or
74
b) any other evidence as to the identity and address of the customer to the
satisfaction of the NBFC.
vi. It was further clarified to NBFCs in April 2008 that for the purpose of Circular
dated February 21, 2005 the term 'being satisfied' means that the NBFC must be
able to satisfy the competent authorities that due diligence was observed based
on the risk profile of the customer in compliance with the extant guidelines in
place. An indicative list of the nature and type of documents/ information that
may be relied upon for customer identification was also given in the Annex-VIII
to this circular. It may happen that Annex-VIII, which was clearly termed as an
indicative list, may be treated by some NBFCs as an exhaustive list as a result of
which a section of public may be denied access to financial services. NBFCs are,
therefore, advised to take a review of their extant internal instructions in this
regard.
75
NBFCs should keep in mind the spirit of instructions issued by the Reserve Bank
and avoid undue hardships to individuals who are, otherwise, classified as low
risk customers.
viii. In terms of extant instructions, NBFCs are required to put in place a system
of periodical review of risk categorisation of accounts and the need for applying
enhanced due diligence measures in case of higher risk perception on a
customer. NBFCs are further advised that such review of risk categorisation of
customers should be carried out at a periodicity of not less than once in six
months. NBFCs also introduce a system of periodical updation of customer
identification data (including photograph/s) after the account is opened. The
periodicity of such updation should not be less than once in five years in case of
low risk category customers and not less than once in two years in case of high
and medium risk categories.
ix. NBFCs have been further advised in terms of extant instructions that
KYC/AML guidelines issued by Reserve Bank of India shall also apply to their
branches and majority owned subsidiaries located outside India, especially, in
countries which do not or insufficiently apply the FATF Recommendations, to
the extent local laws permit. It is further clarified that in case there is a variance
in KYC/AML standards prescribed by the Reserve Bank and the host country
regulators, branches/overseas subsidiaries of NBFCs are required to adopt the
more stringent regulation of the two.
It has been decided to accept the letter issued by the (UIDAI) as an officially
valid document for opening of accounts. Attention was invited to Annex VI para
3 of Master Circular No 231 dated July 1, 2011 on KYC/AML/PMLA dealing
with customer identification. All NBFCs were advised that, while opening
accounts based on Aadhaar also, NBFCs must satisfy themselves about the
current address of the customer by obtaining required proof of the same as per
extant instructions.
76
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Obligations of NBFCs in terms of
Rules notified thereunder’
1. NBFCs were advised to appoint a Principal Officer and put in place a system
of internal reporting of suspicious transactions and cash transactions of Rs.10
lakh and above. In this connection, Government of India, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue, issued a notification dated July 1, 2005 in the Gazette of
India, notifying the Rules under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
(PMLA), 2002. In terms of the Rules, the provisions of PMLA, 2002 have come
into effect from July 1, 2005. Section 12 of the PMLA, 2002 casts certain
obligations on the NBFCs in regard to preservation and reporting of customer
account information. NBFCs are, therefore, advised to go through the provisions
of PMLA, 2002 and the Rules notified there under and take all steps considered
necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of section 12 of the Act
ibid.
(i) all cash transactions of the value of more than rupees ten lakh or its equivalent
in foreign currency;
(ii) all series of cash transactions integrally connected to each other which have
been valued below rupees ten lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency where
such series of transactions have taken place within a month and the aggregate
value of such transactions exceeds rupees ten lakh;
(iii) all cash transactions where forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank
notes have been used as genuine and where any forgery of a valuable security
has taken place;
(iv) all suspicious transactions whether or not made in cash and in manner as
mentioned in the Rules framed by Government of India under the Prevention of
Money Laundering Act , 2002.
3. Information to be preserved
77
NBFCs are required to maintain the following information in respect of
transactions referred to in Rule 3:
NBFCs should take appropriate steps to evolve a system for proper maintenance
and preservation of account information in a manner that allows data to be
retrieved easily and quickly whenever required or when requested by the
competent authorities. Further, NBFCs should maintain for at least ten years
from the date of cessation of transaction between the NBFCs and the client, all
necessary records of transactions, both domestic or international, which will
permit reconstruction of individual transactions (including the amounts and
types of currency involved if any) so as to provide, if necessary, evidence for
prosecution of persons involved in criminal activity.
(i) The Prevention of Money Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2009 (No. 21 of 2009)
has come into force with effect from June 01, 2009 as notified by the Government.
In terms of Sub-Section 2(a) of Section 12 of The Prevention of Money
Laundering (Amendment) Act, 2009 (PMLA, 2009), the records referred to in
clause (a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 12 shall be maintained for a period of ten
years from the date of transaction between the clients and the banking company
and in terms of Sub-Section 2(b) of Section 12 of the Act ibid, the records referred
to in clause (c) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 12 shall be maintained for a period of
ten years from the date of cessation of transaction between the clients and the
banking company.
78
(ii) NBFCs (including RNBCs) are advised to maintain for at least ten years from
the date of transaction between the NBFC (including RNBC) and the client, all
necessary records of transactions referred to at Rule 3 of the Prevention of
Money-Laundering (Maintenance of Records of the Nature and Value of
Transactions, the Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing
Information and Verification and Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the
Clients of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries)
Rules, 2005 (PMLA Rules), both domestic or international, which will permit
reconstruction of individual transactions (including the amounts and types of
currency involved, if any) so as to provide, if necessary, evidence for prosecution
of persons involved in criminal activity.
(iii) However, records pertaining to the identification of the customer and his
address (e.g. copies of documents like passports, identity cards, driving licenses,
PAN card, utility bills etc.) obtained while opening the account and during the
course of business relationship, as indicated in paragraph 4 of the of the above
said Master Circular dated July 1, 2009, would continue to be preserved for at
least ten years after the business relationship is ended as required under Rule 10
of the Rules ibid.
It is advised that in terms of the PMLA rules, NBFCs are required to report
information relating to cash and suspicious transactions to the Director, Financial
Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND) at the following address:
Director, FIU-IND,
Financial Intelligence Unit-India,
6th Floor, Hotel Samrat,
Chanakyapuri,
New Delhi-110021
I) NBFCs should carefully go through all the reporting formats. There are
altogether five reporting formats prescribed for a banking company viz. i)
Manual reporting of cash transactions ii) Manual reporting of suspicious
transactions iii) Consolidated reporting of cash transactions by Principal Officer
of the bank iv) Electronic data structure for cash transaction reporting and v)
Electronic data structure for suspicious transaction reporting which are enclosed
to this circular. The reporting formats contain detailed guidelines on the
79
compilation and manner/procedure of submission of the reports to FIU-IND.
NBFCs are advised to adopt the format prescribed for banks with suitable
modifications. It would be necessary for NBFCs to initiate urgent steps to ensure
electronic filing of cash transaction report (CTR) as early as possible. The related
hardware and technical requirement for preparing reports in an electronic
format, the related data files and data structures thereof are furnished in the
instructions part of the concerned formats. However, NBFCs which are not in a
position to immediately file electronic reports may file manual reports to FIU-
IND. While detailed instructions for filing all types of reports are given in the
instructions part of the related formats, NBFCs should scrupulously adhere to
the following:
(a) The cash transaction report (CTR) for each month should be submitted to
FIU-IND by 15th of the succeeding month. While filing CTR, individual
transactions below rupees fifty thousand may not be included;
(b) The Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) should be furnished within 7 days
of arriving at a conclusion that any transaction, whether cash or non-cash, or a
series of transactions integrally connected are of suspicious nature. The Principal
Officer should record his reasons for treating any transaction or a series of
transactions as suspicious. It should be ensured that there is no undue delay in
arriving at such a conclusion once a suspicious transaction report is received
from a branch or any other office. Such report should be made available to the
competent authorities on request;
(c) The Principal Officer will be responsible for timely submission of CTR and
STR to FIU-IND;
(d) Utmost confidentiality should be maintained in filing of CTR and STR with
FIU-IND. The reports may be transmitted by speed/ registered post, fax, email at
the notified address;
(e) It should be ensured that the reports for all the branches are filed in one mode
i.e. electronic or manual;
(f) A summary of cash transaction report for the NBFC as a whole may be
compiled by the Principal Officer of the NBFC in physical form as per the format
specified. The summary should be signed by the Principal Officer and submitted
both for manual and electronic reporting.
80
6. NBFCs may not put any restrictions on operations in the accounts where an
STR has been made. However, it should be ensured that there is no tipping off to
the customer at any level.
10. In regard to CTR, it is reiterated that the cut-off limit of Rupees ten lakh is
applicable to integrally connected cash transactions also. Further, after
consultation with FIU-IND, it is clarified that :
81
month, where either debit or credit summation, computed separately, exceeds
Rupees ten lakh during the month. However, while filing CTR, details of
individual cash transactions below rupees fifty thousand may not be indicated.
Illustration of integrally connected cash transactions is furnished in Annex-I;
b) CTR should contain only the transactions carried out by the NBFC on behalf of
their clients/customers excluding transactions between the internal accounts of
the NBFC;
c) All cash transactions, where forged or counterfeit Indian currency notes have
been used as genuine should be reported by the Principal Officer to FIU-IND
immediately in the format (Counterfeit Currency Report – CCR) as per Annex-II .
Electronic data structure has been furnished in Annex-IV to enable NBFCs to
generate electronic CCRs. These cash transactions should also include
transactions where forgery of valuable security or documents has taken place
and may be reported to FIU-IND in plain text form.
12. In paragraph 7 of April 5, 2006 circular, NBFCs have been advised that the
customer should not be tipped off on the STRs made by them to FIU-IND. It is
likely that in some cases transactions are abandoned/ aborted by customers on
being asked to give some details or to provide documents. It is clarified that
NBFCs should report all such attempted transactions in STRs, even if not
completed by customers, irrespective of the amount of the transaction.
13. While making STRs, NBFCs should be guided by the definition of 'suspicious
transaction' as contained in Rule 2(g) of Rules ibid. It is further clarified that
NBFCs should make STRs if they have reasonable ground to believe that the
transaction involve proceeds of crime generally irrespective of the amount of
82
transaction and/or the threshold limit envisaged for predicate offences in part B
of Schedule of PMLA, 2002 .
14. In the context of creating KYC/AML awareness among the staff and for
generating alerts for suspicious transactions, NBFCs may consider the indicative
list of suspicious activities contained in Annex-V to the Master Circular.
83
laundering and terror financing risks, a national AML/CFT strategy and
institutional framework for AML/CFT in India. Assessment of risk of Money
Laundering /Financing of Terrorism helps both the competent authorities and
the regulated entities in taking necessary steps for combating ML/FT adopting a
risk-based approach. This helps in judicious and efficient allocation of resources
and makes the AML/CFT regime more robust. The Committee has made
recommendations regarding adoption of a risk-based approach, assessment of
risk and putting in place a system which would use that assessment to take steps
to effectively counter ML/FT. The recommendations of the Committee have
since been accepted by the Government of India and needs to be implemented.
Accordingly, NBFCs should take steps to identify and assess their ML/FT risk
for customers, countries and geographical areas as also for products/ services/
transactions/delivery channels, in addition to what has been prescribed in our
Master Circular dated July 1, 2011, referred to in paragraph 2 above. NBFCs
should have policies, controls and procedures, duly approved by their boards, in
place to effectively manage and mitigate their risk adopting a risk-based
approach as discussed above. As a corollary, NBFCs would be required to adopt
enhanced measures for products, services and customers with a medium or high
risk rating.
In this regard, Indian Banks' Association (IBA) has taken initiative in assessment
of ML/FT risk in the banking sector. This has circulated to its member banks on
May 18, 2011 and a copy of their Report on Parameters for Risk Based
Transaction Monitoring (RBTM) as a supplement to their guidance note on Know
Your Customer (KYC) norms / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards issued
in July 2009, is available on the IBA website. The IBA guidance also provides an
indicative list of high risk customers, products, services and geographies. NBFCs
may use the same as guidance in their own risk assessment.
Reference was invited to Master Circular No 231 dated July 1, 2011 on 'Know
Your Customer' (KYC) Guidelines- Anti Money Laundering (AML) Standards. In
terms of the extant instructions, NBFCs were required to report
information/data relating to Cash and Suspicious Transactions to the Director,
Financial Intelligence Unit-India (FIU-IND) in the prescribed format.
The present multiple data files reporting format mentioned in Annex-II and
Annex-IV of para 28 c of the Master circular No 291 is being replaced by a new
84
single XML file format as provided in the ‗Download‘ section of the FIU-IND
website (http://fiuindia.gov.in).
All NBFCs were requested to carefully go through the revised reporting format
and initiate urgent steps to build capacity to generate reports, which are
compliant with the new reporting XML format specifications. The exact date of
transition from the old reporting format to the new format will to be
communicated separately.
The Fair Practices Code of the NBFCs should be put up on their website, if any,
for the information of various stakeholders.
NBFCs were advised on September 28, 2006 (Guidelines on Fair Practices Code-
[DNBS (PD) CC No. 80 / 03.10.042 / 2005-06 dated September 28, 2006), to
prescribe the broad guidelines on fair practices that are to be framed and
approved by the boards of directors of all non-banking financial companies
(including RNBCs). The fair practices code so framed and approved by the board
of directors is to be published and disseminated on the website of the company,
if any, for the information of the public
(b) Loan application forms should include necessary information which affects
the interest of the borrower, so that a meaningful comparison with the terms and
conditions offered by other NBFCs can be made and informed decision can be
taken by the borrower.
(c) The NBFCs should devise a system of giving acknowledgement for receipt of
all loan applications. Preferably, the time frame within which loan applications
will be disposed of should also be indicated in the acknowledgement.
85
(ii) Loan appraisal and terms/conditions
The NBFCs should convey in writing to the borrower, the amount of loan
sanctioned along with the terms and conditions including annualised rate of
interest and method of application thereof and keep the acceptance of these
terms and conditions by the borrower on its record. As complaints received
against NBFCs generally pertain to charging of high interest / penal interest,
NBFCs shall mention the penal interest charged for late repayment in bold in the
loan agreement.
(a) The NBFCs should give notice to the borrower of any change in the terms and
conditions including disbursement schedule, interest rates, service charges,
prepayment charges etc. NBFCs should also ensure that changes in interest rates
and charges are effected only prospectively. A suitable condition in this regard
should be incorporated in the loan agreement.
(c) NBFCs should release all securities on repayment of all dues or on realisation
of the outstanding amount of loan subject to any legitimate right or lien for any
other claim NBFCs may have against borrower. If such right of set off is to be
exercised, the borrower shall be given notice about the same with full particulars
about the remaining claims and the conditions under which NBFCs are entitled
to retain the securities till the relevant claim is settled/paid.
(iv) General
(a) NBFCs should refrain from interference in the affairs of the borrower except
for the purposes provided in the terms and conditions of sanction of the loan
(unless new information, not earlier disclosed by the borrower, has come to the
notice of the lender).
(b) In case of receipt of request for transfer of borrowal account, either from the
borrower or from a lender which proposes to take over the account, the consent
or otherwise i.e. objection of the NBFC, if any, should be conveyed within 21
86
days from the date of receipt of request. Such transfer shall be as per transparent
contractual terms in consonance with law.
(c) In the matter of recovery of loans, the NBFCs should not resort to undue
harassment.
The Board of Directors of NBFCs should also lay down the appropriate grievance
redressal mechanism within the organization to resolve disputes arising in this
regard. Such a mechanism should ensure that all disputes arising out of the
decisions of lending institutions' functionaries are heard and disposed of at least
at the next higher level. The Board of Directors should also provide for periodical
review of the compliance of the Fair Practices Code and the functioning of the
grievances redressal mechanism at various levels of management. A
consolidated report of such reviews may be submitted to the Board at regular
intervals, as may be prescribed by it.
(vi) Fair Practices Code (which should preferably in the vernacular language or a
language as understood by the borrower) based on the guidelines outlined
hereinabove should be put in place by all NBFCs with the approval of their
Boards within one month from the date of issue of this circular. NBFCs will have
the freedom of drafting the Fair Practices Code, enhancing the scope of the
guidelines but in no way sacrificing the spirit underlying the above guidelines.
The same should be put up on their web-site, if any, for the information of
various stakeholders.
(a) The Board of each NBFC shall adopt an interest rate model taking into
account relevant factors such as, cost of funds, margin and risk premium, etc and
determine the rate of interest to be charged for loans and advances. The rate of
interest and the approach for gradations of risk and rationale for charging
different rate of interest to different categories of borrowers shall be disclosed to
the borrower or customer in the application form and communicated explicitly in
the sanction letter.
87
(b) The rates of interest and the approach for gradation of risks shall also be
made available on the web-site of the companies or published in the relevant
newspapers. The information published in the website or otherwise published
should be updated whenever there is a change in the rates of interest.
(c) The rate of interest should be annualised rates so that the borrower is aware
of the exact rates that would be charged to the account.
The Reserve Bank has been receiving several complaints regarding levying of
excessive interest and charges on certain loans and advances by NBFCs. Though
interest rates are not regulated by the Bank, rates of interest beyond a certain
level may be seen to be excessive and can neither be sustainable nor be
conforming to normal financial practice.
Boards of NBFCs are, therefore, advised to lay out appropriate internal principles
and procedures in determining interest rates and processing and other charges.
In this regard the guidelines indicated in the Fair Practices Code about
transparency in respect of terms and conditions of the loans are to be kept in
view.
88
The Reserve Bank has revised the guidelines on Fair Practices Code (FPC) for all
NBFCs issued on September 28, 2006 in the light of the recent developments in
the NBFC sector. The salient features of the revised circular dated March 26, 2012
are as follows:
General
(b) Loan application forms should include necessary information that affects the
interests of the borrower.
(d) NBFCs should refrain from interference in the affairs of the borrower except
for the purposes provided in the terms and conditions of the loan agreement.
(e) In the matter of recovery of loans, the NBFCs should not resort to undue
harassment and ensure that the staffs are adequately trained to deal with
customers.
(f) The Board of Directors of NBFCs should also lay down the appropriate
grievance redressal mechanism within the organisation.
(g) The Fair Practices Code should be put in place by all NBFCs with the
approval of their Boards. The same should be put up on their website.
(h) Boards of NBFCs should lay out appropriate internal principles and
procedures to determine interest rates and processing and other charges.
(i) The Board of each NBFC shall adopt an interest rate model taking into account
relevant factors, such as cost of funds, margins and risk premium.
89
the sale / auction of the property; (e) the procedure for giving repossession to the
borrower and (f) the procedure for sale/ auction of the property.
The Reserve Bank has issued guidelines (Master Circular No. RBI/2012-13/23
DNBS.PD.CC. No.283/03.10.042/2012-13 dated July 2nd, 2012) to NBFCs
(including RNBCs) on classification of frauds, approach towards monitoring of
frauds and reporting requirements from time to time under Section 45K and 45 L
of the RBI Act, 1934.
While the primary responsibility for preventing frauds lies with NBFCs
themselves, a reporting system for frauds prescribed by the abovementioned
Master Circular is given in the following paragraphs:
NBFCs should ensure that a reporting system is in place so that frauds are
reported without any delay.
NBFCs should fix staff accountability in respect of delays in reporting of
fraud cases to the Reserve Bank.
NBFCs may, strictly adhere to the fixed timeframe fixed for reporting
fraud cases to the Reserve Bank failing which NBFCs would be liable for
penal action as prescribed under the provisions of Chapter V of the RBI
Act, 1934.
NBFCs should specifically nominate an official of the rank of General
Manager or equivalent who will be responsible for submitting all the
returns
In order to have uniformity in reporting, frauds have been classified as
under based mainly on the provisions of the Indian Penal Code:
90
(f) Irregularities in foreign exchange transactions.
(g) Any other type of fraud not coming under the specific heads as above.
91
A copy of FMR-1 where the amount involved in the Fraud is Rs 25 lakhs
and above should also be submitted to the Regional Office of the
Department of Non-Banking Supervision of Reserve Bank of India under
whose jurisdiction the Registered Office of the NBFC falls.
Frauds involving Rs. 25 lakh and above
In respect of frauds involving Rs. 25 lakh and above, in addition to the
requirements given above, NBFCs may report the fraud by means of a
D.O. letter addressed to the Chief General Manager-in-charge of the
Department of Banking Supervision, Reserve Bank of India, Frauds
Monitoring Cell, Central Office and a copy endorsed to the Chief General
Manager-in-charge of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision,
Reserve Bank of India, Central Office within a week of such frauds coming
to the notice of the NBFC. The letter may contain brief particulars of the
fraud such as amount involved, nature of fraud, modus operandi in brief,
name of the branch/office, names of parties involved (if they are
proprietorship/ partnership concerns or private limited companies, the
names of proprietors, partners and directors), names of officials involved,
and whether the complaint has been lodged with the Police. A copy of the
D.O. letter should also be endorsed to the Regional Office of Reserve
Bank, Department of Non-Banking Supervision under whose jurisdiction
the Registered Office of the NBFC is functioning.
NBFCs should submit a copy of the Quarterly Report on Frauds
Outstanding in the format given in FMR – 2 to the Regional Office of the
Reserve Bank of India, Department of Non-Banking Supervision under
whose jurisdiction the Registered Office of the NBFC falls irrespective of
amount within 15 days of the end of the quarter to which it relates.
NBFCs should furnish a certificate, as part of the above report, to the
effect that all individual fraud cases of Rs. 1 lakh and above reported to
the Reserve Bank in FMR – 1 during the quarter have also been put up to
the NBFC‘s Board and have been incorporated in Part – A (columns 4 and
5) and Parts B and C of FMR – 2.
Progress Report on Frauds - NBFCs should furnish case-wise quarterly
progress reports on frauds involving Rs. 1 lakh and above in the format
given in FMR – 3 to the Central Office (CO) of the Reserve Bank of India,
Department of Banking Supervision, Frauds Monitoring Cell where the
amount involved in fraud is Rs 25 lakhs and above and to Regional Office
of the Reserve Bank of India, Department of Non-Banking Supervision
under whose jurisdiction the Registered Office of the NBFC falls where
the fraud amount involved in fraud is less than Rs 25 lakh within 15 days
of the end of the quarter to which it relates.
NBFCs should ensure that all frauds of Rs. 1 lakh and above are reported
to their Boards promptly on their detection. Such reports should, among
other things, take note of the failure on the part of the concerned officials,
92
and consider initiation of appropriate action against the officials
responsible for the fraud.
Quarterly Review of Frauds
Annual Review of Frauds
Guidelines to be followed for reporting Frauds to the Police
Listed NBFCs which are required to adhere to listing agreement and rules
framed by SEBI on Corporate Governance are already required to comply with
SEBI prescriptions on Corporate Governance.
iii) The importance of appointment of directors with ‗fit and proper‘ credentials
is well recognised in the financial sector. In terms of Section 45-IA(4)(c) of the RBI
Act, 1934, while considering the application for grant of Certificate of
Registration to undertake the business of non-banking financial institution it is
necessary to ensure that the general character of the management or the
proposed management of the non-banking financial company shall not be
prejudicial to the interest of its present and future depositors. In view of the
interest evinced by various entities in this segment, it would be desirable that
NBFC-D with deposit size of Rs 20 crore and above and NBFC-ND-SI may form
93
a Nomination Committee to ensure ‗fit and proper‘ status of proposed/existing
Directors.
iv) The market risk for NBFCs with Public Deposit of Rs.20 crore and above or
having an asset size of Rs.100 crore or above as on the date of last audited
balance sheet is addressed by the Asset Liability Management Committee
(ALCO) constituted to monitor the asset liability gap and strategize action to
mitigate the risk associated. To manage the integrated risk, a risk management
committee may be formed, in addition to the ALCO in case of the above category
of NBFCs.
Connected Lending
The Bank has received suggestions in the matter with reference to paragraph
2(vi) of the circular dated May 28, 2007 containing instructions on connected
lending. The suggestions are being studied and the instructions contained in
paragraph 2 (vi) of the said circular will become operational after final evaluation
of the suggestions and modifications, if any considered necessary.
The need for good corporate governance has been gaining increased emphasis
over the years. Globally, Companies are adopting best corporate practices to
94
increase the investors confidence as also that of other stakeholders. Scrutiny of
the books of account conducted by auditors rotated periodically would add
further value in strengthening corporate governance.
As per Sr.No.24.2 of Annex B to A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 137 dated June 28,
2012:
Foreign investment (100%) in NBFC is allowed under the automatic route in only
the following activities:
95
(xiv) Forex Broking
(xv) Credit Card Business
(xvi) Money Changing Business
(xvii) Micro Credit
(xviii) Rural Credit
(ii) US $ 5 million for foreign capital more than 51% and up to 75% to be brought
upfront
(iii)US $ 50 million for foreign capital more than 75% out of which US$ 7.5
million to be brought upfront and the balance in 24 months.
(iv) There is a specific exception for 100% foreign-owned NBFCs where there is
no restriction on establishing downstream subsidiaries without further
capitalizing each subsidiary with the minimum required foreign investment.
However, this specific dispensation was not available to NBFCs where foreign
investment is between 75% and 100%. By way of a Press Note No. 9 (2012) Series,
the Government has now brought such NBFCs on par with 100% foreign-owned
NBFCs, whereby they can also set up downstream subsidiaries without further
capitalizing each one of them with the requirement minimum amount.
NBFCs (1) having foreign investment more than 75% and up to 100%, and (2)
with a minimum capitalisation of US$ 50 million, can set up step down
subsidiaries for specific NBFC activities, without any restriction on the number
of operating subsidiaries and without bringing in additional capital. The
minimum capitalisation condition as mandated by para 3.10.4.1 of DIPP Circular
1of 2012 dated April 10, 2012 on Consolidated FDI Policy, therefore, shall not
apply to downstream subsidiaries.
(v) Joint Venture operating NBFCs that have 75% or less than 75% foreign
investment can also set up subsidiaries for undertaking other NBFC activities,
subject to the subsidiaries also complying with the applicable minimum
capitalisation norm mentioned in (i), (ii) and (iii) above and (vi) below.
96
(vi)Non- Fund based activities : US $0.5 million to be brought upfront for all
permitted non-fund based NBFCs irrespective of the level of foreign investment
subject to the following condition:
It would not be permissible for such a company to set up any subsidiary for any
other activity, nor it can participate in any equity of an NBFC holding/operating
company.
Note:
(i) Credit Card business includes issuance, sales, marketing & design of various
payment products such as credit cards, charge cards, debit cards, stored value
cards, smart card, value added cards etc.
(ii) Leasing & Finance covers only financial leases and not operating leases.
(2) The NBFC will have to comply with the guidelines of the relevant regulator/
s, as applicable.
The Reserve Bank has issued Master Circular No. RBI/2012-13/28 DNBS (PD)
CC No.292/03.02.001/2012-13 dated July 2nd, 2012 on Opening of Branch-
Subsidiary-Joint Venture- Representative office or Undertaking Investment
Abroad by NBFCs.
97
NBFCs were advised to refer to Regulation No. 7 of the Foreign Exchange
Management (Transfer or Issue of Any Foreign Security) (Amendment)
Regulations, 2004, dated July 07, 2004, in terms of which an Indian party requires
prior approval of the concerned regulatory authorities both in India and abroad,
to make an investment in an entity outside India engaged in financial services
activities. Further in terms of para B.5.3 of the Master Circular on Direct
Investment in Joint Venture (JV) / Wholly owned subsidiary (WOS) abroad
dated July 01, 2009 issued by Foreign Exchange Department, RBI, regulated
entities in the financial sector making investments in any activity overseas are
required to comply with the above regulation.
Instances have been observed where NBFCs have made overseas investments
without regulatory clearance of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision,
Reserve Bank of India. Any investments made by NBFCs without regulatory
clearance is a violation of FEMA 2004 and attracts penal provisions.
In this regard, it is emphasised that all NBFCs desirous of making any overseas
investment must obtain 'No Objection' (NoC) of the Department of Non-Banking
Supervision of RBI before making such investment, from the Regional Office in
whose jurisdiction the head office of the company is registered.
98
Venture/Wholly Owned Subsidiary.
3. The following general and specific conditions are prescribed for permitting
subsidiaries/joint ventures/representative office or making investments abroad
by a NBFC (both deposit taking and non-deposit taking) registered with RBI.
General conditions
99
should be satisfactory
l. The NBFC shall comply with the KYC norms;
m. SPVs set up abroad or acquisition abroad shall be treated as investment or
subsidiary/joint venture abroad, depending upon percentage of investment in
overseas entity;
n. An annual certificate from statutory auditors shall be submitted by the NBFC
to the Regional Office of Department of Non-Banking Supervision (DNBS) where
it is registered, certifying that it has fully complied with all the conditions
stipulated under these Guidelines for overseas investment;
o. A quarterly return in the enclosed format shall be submitted by the NBFC to
the Regional Office of DNBS and also Department of Statistics and Information
Management (DSIM)
p. If any adverse features come to the notice of the Bank, the permission granted
shall be withdrawn. All approvals for investment abroad shall be subject to this
condition.
Specific conditions.
In addition, the following stipulations are made, which shall be applicable to all
NBFCs:
b. No request for letter of comfort in favour of the subsidiary abroad from any
institution in India shall be permitted;
100
c. It shall be ensured that NBFC‘s liability in the proposed overseas entity is
restricted to its either equity or fund based commitment to the subsidiary;
d. The subsidiary being established abroad should not be a shell company i.e "a
company that is incorporated, but has no significant assets or operations."
However companies undertaking activities such as financial consultancy and
advisory services with no significant assets shall not be considered as shell
companies;
e. The subsidiary being established abroad by the NBFC should not be used as a
vehicle for raising resources for creating assets in India for the Indian operations;
f. In order to ensure compliance of the provisions, the parent NBFC shall obtain
periodical reports/audit reports about the business undertaken by the subsidiary
abroad and shall make them available to Reserve Bank and inspecting officials of
the Bank;
g. If the subsidiary has not undertaken any activity or such reports are not
forthcoming, the approvals given for setting up a subsidiary abroad shall be
reviewed/ recalled;
The representative office can be set up abroad for the purpose of liaison work,
undertaking market study and research but not undertaking any activity which
involves outlay of funds, provided it is subject to regulation by a regulator in the
101
host country. As it is not envisaged that such office would be carrying on any
activity other than liaison work, no line of credit should be extended.
The parent NBFC shall obtain periodical reports about the business undertaken
by the representative office abroad. If the representative office has not
undertaken any activity or such reports are not forthcoming, the approvals given
for the purpose shall be reviewed/ recalled.
4. Violation of these directions shall invite penal action under the provisions of
Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
The Board for Financial Supervision (BFS) in its meeting held on September 29,
2010, desired that a Working Group be constituted with experts to study the
issues and concerns in the NBFC sector. Accordingly, a Working Group (WG)
was set up under the Chairmanship of Smt. Usha Thorat, Director, Centre for
Advanced Financial Research and Learning (CAFRAL).
The Working Group submitted its Report on August 23rd, 2011 and apart from
various recommendations on various aspects, recommended the following
Legislative Changes:
1. The Working Group is of the view that insurance business and chit fund
business should be omitted from Section 45I(c) of the RBI Act 1934 whenever the
amendments are taken up. New forms of business which may require to be
regulated by RBI may be separately identified for inclusion in Section 45 I(c) at
that time, or flexibility may be given to RBI to include in the said list of
businesses, any other business from time to time.
2. The present limit of Rs. 2 crore is too small to enable a financial entity to carry
on business in such a manner that there are economies of scale and scope. A
higher entry barrier in the form of a higher Net Owned Fund (NOF) requirement
is necessary so that only serious players enter the sector. Hence, a minimum
requirement of Rs. 2 crore in start up NOF is grossly inadequate from the
perspective of financial soundness and solvency. The Working Group feels as
102
and when the RBI Act amendments are taken up, Section 45IA (1) (b) of the RBI
Act 1934 should be amended to prescribe entry level criteria as a floor without a
cap on the power of RBI to specify a higher requirement of NOF.
3. Banks and NBFCs are in similar businesses of lending and investing. Since the
assets of the two financial entities are similar, it is necessary that they be subject
to similar prudential norms for asset classification, income recognition and
provisioning. However, the tax treatments for provisions are not similar. It is
therefore proposed that the tax treatment for provisions made by NBFCs for
regulatory purposes should be similar to that for banks.
4. Unlike banks and Public Financial Institutions (PFIs), most NBFCs (except
those which are PFIs under Section 4A of the Companies Act) do not enjoy the
benefits deriving from the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets
and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act 2002, even though their
clients/borrowers may be exactly the same. The Working Group is of the view
that there is a good case for considering NBFCs to be notified by Central
Government under Section 2(1) (m) (iv) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.
5. In regulating NBFCs, RBI should have the power to legally prescribe fit and
proper conditions and have the powers to remove the directors in the event they
are not found fit or proper and even appoint directors where it is necessary to do
so in public interest and in the interest of financial stability. There should also be
powers to supersede the Board in the interest of financial stability and constitute
a fresh Board. Also provisions similar to those in banks for obtaining prior
approval of RBI for any significant acquisition of ownership and control in any
NBFC could be made part of the legislation. This may be considered at the time
of comprehensive legislation change for the financial sector.
6. Suitable amendments may be carried out in the RBI Act, 1934, making it
obligatory for NBFCs to obtain prior approval of the RBI for any merger,
acquisitions or change in management or control.
103
About the Author
Rajkumar S. Adukia
B. Com (Hons.), FCA, ACS, AICWA, LL.B, M.B.A, Dip IFRS (UK), Dip LL & LW
Senior Partner, Adukia & Associates, Chartered Accountants
Meridien Apts, Bldg 1, Office no. 3 to 6
Veera Desai Road, Andheri (West)
Mumbai 400 058
Mobile 098200 61049/093230 61049
Fax 26765579
Email [email protected]
104
Mr. Adukia is a rank holder from Bombay University. He did his graduation from
Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. He received a Gold Medal for highest
marks in Accountancy & Auditing in the Examination. He passed the Chartered
Accountancy with 1st Rank in Inter CA & 6th Rank in Final CA, and 3rd Rank in Final
Cost Accountancy Course in 1983. He started his practice as a Chartered Accountant on
1st July 1983, in the three decades following which he left no stone unturned, be it
academic expertise or professional development. His level of knowledge, source of
information, professional expertise spread across a wide range of subjects has made him
a strong and sought after professional in every form of professional assignment.
He has served on the Board of Directors in the capacity of independent director at BOI
Asset management Co. Ltd, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and SBI Mutual Funds
Management Pvt Ltd. He was also a member of the London Fraud Investigation Team
Mr. Rajkumar Adukia specializes in IFRS, Enterprise Risk Management, Internal Audit,
Business Advisory and Planning, Commercial Law Compliance, XBRL, Labor Laws, Real
Estate, Foreign Exchange Management, Insurance, Project Work, Carbon Credit,
Taxation and Trusts. His clientele include large corporations, owner-managed
companies, small manufacturers, service businesses, property management and
construction, exporters and importers, and professionals. He has undertaken specific
105
assignments on fraud investigation and reporting in the corporate sector and has
developed background material on the same.
Based on his rich experience, he has written numerous articles on critical aspects of
finance-accounting, auditing, taxation, valuation, public finance. His authoritative
articles appear regularly in financial papers like Business India, Financial Express,
Economic Times and other professional / business magazines. He has authored several
accounting and auditing manuals. He has authored books on vast range of topics
including IFRS, Internal Audit, Bank Audit, Green Audit, SEZ, CARO, PMLA, Anti-
dumping, Income Tax Search, Survey and Seizure, Real Estate etc. His books are known
for their practicality and for their proactive approaches to meeting practice needs.
Mr. Rajkumar is a frequent speaker on trade and finance at seminars and conferences
organized by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, various Chambers of
Commerce, Income Tax Offices and other Professional Associations. He has also
lectured at the S.P. Jain Institute of Management, Intensive Coaching Classes for Inter &
Final CA students and Direct Taxes Regional Training Institute of CBDT. He also
develops and delivers short courses, seminars and workshops on changes and
opportunities in trade and finance. He has extensive experience as a speaker, moderator
and panelist at workshops and conferences held for both students and professionals both
nationally and internationally.. Mr. Adukia has delivered lectures abroad at forums of
International Federation of Accountants and has travelled across countries for
professional work.
Professional Association: Mr. Rajkumar S Adukia with his well chartered approach
towards professional assignments has explored every possible opportunity in the fields of
business and profession. Interested professionals are welcome to share their thoughts in
this regard.
106
Some of the notable publications authored by Mr. Rajkumar S Adukia
To receive regular updates kindly send test email to
4) Concept of Derivatives
5) Due Diligence
107
20) An insight into XBRL [eXtensible Business Reporting Language]
21) A Study On Proposed Goods And Services Tax [GST] Framework In India
23) ESOP and Sweat Equity - Concept, Regulatory Framework, Accounting and Taxation
24) An Insight into Twenty Four Sunrise Professional Opportunities for Chartered Accountants
25) Overview of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Including Provisions of The Preventio
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Bill, 2011
32) Mines
37) ClimateChange Mitigation & Its Importance for Professionals & Business
108
41) An overview of the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Sector
109