Doctrine of Equality of Shares - All Stocks Issued by
Doctrine of Equality of Shares - All Stocks Issued by
The doctrine of equality of shares presumes that all stocks issued by a corporation have the same privileges and liabilities, as long as the Articles of Incorporation are silent on any differences. This ensures that each share is equal in all respects to every other share regarding voting rights, dividends, and liquidation preferences, unless otherwise specified. This doctrine influences shareholder rights by ensuring uniformity and fairness among shareholders unless specific provisions in the articles state otherwise .
A corporation can ensure uniformity by clearly detailing the rights and responsibilities associated with each class of shares in the articles of incorporation. This includes specifying voting rights, dividend structures, liquidation preferences, and any conversion rights. By adhering to the doctrine of equality of shares, and explicitly addressing variances in shares in foundational documents, corporations can maintain transparency and fairness, minimizing disputes among shareholders .
Redeemable shares can be issued only if expressly provided in the articles of incorporation. They can be bought back by the corporation after a set period, regardless of unrestricted retained earnings. This condition means shareholders may have to relinquish their shares under the terms outlined, which may include a predetermined redemption date and price. Thus, it impacts a shareholder's investment timeline and potentially their expected returns .
The classification of shares in a corporation can be used strategically to comply with constitutional or legal requirements. For instance, shares can be classified to meet foreign ownership restrictions or to ensure certain shareholder demographics. This classification allows a corporation to tailor its governance structure and shareholder rights in accordance with legal mandates while maximizing strategic advantages and maintaining regulatory compliance .
The SEC plays a crucial role in approving the issuance of founders' shares with special voting rights. Founders' shares may grant exclusive rights to vote and be voted for during director elections but only for a limited period of five years. This authority and the time limitation are subject to SEC approval, ensuring regulatory oversight and preventing long-term concentration of power among founders .
Corporations may issue no-par value shares to provide flexibility in setting share prices and simplifying the accounting process by avoiding the traditional par value constraints. Restrictions include a minimum issuance value of five pesos per share, and proceeds from no-par shares must be treated as capital, which cannot be distributed as dividends. This ensures a minimum capital base protecting creditors' interests .
Non-voting shares generally do not have voting rights, except on specific matters where the Corporation Code grants them such rights. These matters include amendments of the articles of incorporation, adoption and amendment of by-laws, and decisions involving corporate property disposition, bonded indebtedness, capital stock adjustments, mergers, investments, and dissolution. These exceptions ensure that holders of non-voting shares have a say in significant corporate changes .
Preferred shares may have special rights such as preference in the distribution of corporate assets upon liquidation and preference in dividend payments. They may also include other preferences not violating the Corporation Code, which must be stated in the articles of incorporation. Unlike common shares, preferred shares must have a stated par value. However, they often do not hold voting rights unless specified otherwise. This structure can attract investors seeking prioritized returns over voting power .
Issuing founders' shares with special rights can centralize control, at least temporarily, by granting founders disproportionate influence over corporate decisions. While this can foster stability and visionary leadership in the early stages, it might also delay broader shareholder engagement and potentially cause conflicts once the special rights expire. Hence, corporations must strategically balance this concentrated control with normal corporate governance practices to ensure sustainable governance .
Treasury shares are issued stocks that have been reacquired by the corporation. They can be re-issued at a reasonable price determined by the board of directors. Legal considerations include ensuring compliance with corporate governance laws and the requirement to provide transparency in the pricing and sale process. The decision to reissue such shares must align with the corporation's financial strategy and market conditions .