0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views3 pages

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATON FORM (With Sample Computation)

This document contains a sample SBM Level of Practice Validation Form that assesses a school's performance across three categories: Access, Efficiency, and Quality. Metrics like enrollment rates, dropout rates, and National Mean Percentage Scores are measured over multiple school years and used to calculate category ratings on a scale of 1 to 3. These category ratings are then weighted and summed to determine an overall performance rating of Good, Better, or Best. However, the validation form provided is incomplete as it lacks any numerical performance data for the school years assessed.

Uploaded by

Yza Velle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views3 pages

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATON FORM (With Sample Computation)

This document contains a sample SBM Level of Practice Validation Form that assesses a school's performance across three categories: Access, Efficiency, and Quality. Metrics like enrollment rates, dropout rates, and National Mean Percentage Scores are measured over multiple school years and used to calculate category ratings on a scale of 1 to 3. These category ratings are then weighted and summed to determine an overall performance rating of Good, Better, or Best. However, the validation form provided is incomplete as it lacks any numerical performance data for the school years assessed.

Uploaded by

Yza Velle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATON FORM (with sample computation)

SY: 2012 - 2015

School: TABERNA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL District: PALOMPON


Division: LEYTE Date of Assessment/Validation:

Part- I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
2011-2012 790 Baseline
2012-2013 853 63/790 = 7.97% 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)
2013-2014 843 53/790 = 6.71% 2-average (at least 5% increase)
2014-2015 827 37/790 = 4.68% 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase 7.97+6.71+4.68/3 = 6.45% average = 2

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout Rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
(Baseline=7.06)
2012-2013 4.35% -2.71/7.06(100) = -38.39% ; -2.75 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.)
2013-2014 0.63% -6.43/7.06(100) = -91.08% ; -6.43 (2% dec.)
2014-2015 0.48% -6.58/7.06(100) = -93.2% ; -6.58 2-average (at least 50% dec.); 4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease = -74.22% ; -5.24%
-38.39+(-91.08)+(-93.2) 3
School Year Completion rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline -75%
2012-2013 81.30% 6.3/75(100) = 8.4% 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2013-2014 68.01% -6.99/75(100) = -9.32% 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2014-2015 91.56% 16.56/75(100) = 22.08% 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase = 7.05% 2

School Year Cohort Surv. Rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline
2012-2013 85.39% 10.39/75(100) = 13.85% 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2013-2014 69.63% -5.37/75(100) = -7.16% 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2014-2015 99.52% 24.75/75(100) = 32.69% 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase = 13.13% Average = 3
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR+CR+CSR/3 = 3+2+3 = 2.67

B. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Formula: Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67 Sec.= 48 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem. ; 7%
2012-2013 66 18/48(100) = 37.50% Sec. increase)
2013-2014 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
2014-2015 Sec. increase)
3 high (at least 7% Elem. ; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase Average = 3

SUMMARY
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45% 2 x 0.45 0.9
Efficiency 25% 2.67 x 0.25 0.67
Quality 30% 3 x 0.30 0.9
Total 100% 2.47 = Better
INTERPRETATION
Legend Good: 0.5 - 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment
Better: 1.5 - 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 - 3.0
SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATON FORM (with sample computation)
SY: 2017 - 2018

School: ISABEL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL District: ISABEL


Division: LEYTE Date of Assessment/Validation:
Part- I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
2014-2015 Baseline
2015-2016 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)
2016-2017 2-average (at least 5% increase)
2017-2018 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase =
B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout Rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
(Baseline=7.06)
2015-2016 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.)
2016-2017 (2% dec.)
2017-2018 2-average (at least 50% dec.); 4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease
School Year Completion rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline -75%
2015-2016 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2016-2017 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2017-2018 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase =
School Year Cohort Surv. Rate % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline
2015-2016 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2016-2017 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2017-2018 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase =
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR+CR+CSR/3 =
B. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Formula: Rating & Eqiuv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67 Sec.= 48 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem. ; 7%
2015-2016 Sec. increase)
2016-2017 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
2017-2018 Sec. increase)
3 high (at least 7% Elem. ; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase

SUMMARY
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45%
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
Total 100%
INTERPRETATION
Legend Good: 0.5 - 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment
Better: 1.5 - 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 - 3.0

You might also like