0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views3 pages

Assigned Case Digest Submitted by Assigned Case Digest Submitted by Christopher G. Halnin Christopher G. Halnin

1) Mary Lyon Martin filed a motion to quash the order of execution, arguing that as she was not a party to the original case, her rights and interests should not be affected by the judgment. 2) The Court held that once a judgment becomes final and executory, it becomes immutable and cannot be modified. The only remedy for an excluded heir is to file a new, independent suit against the parties in the original case to prove their claim to a share of the property. 3) The trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify the final judgment by including Mary Lyon Martin as a co-heir entitled to participate in the property partition. Her remedy was to file a separate case, not a motion

Uploaded by

Ana Luna Adolfo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views3 pages

Assigned Case Digest Submitted by Assigned Case Digest Submitted by Christopher G. Halnin Christopher G. Halnin

1) Mary Lyon Martin filed a motion to quash the order of execution, arguing that as she was not a party to the original case, her rights and interests should not be affected by the judgment. 2) The Court held that once a judgment becomes final and executory, it becomes immutable and cannot be modified. The only remedy for an excluded heir is to file a new, independent suit against the parties in the original case to prove their claim to a share of the property. 3) The trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify the final judgment by including Mary Lyon Martin as a co-heir entitled to participate in the property partition. Her remedy was to file a separate case, not a motion

Uploaded by

Ana Luna Adolfo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Assigned Case Digest submitted by

CHRISTOPHER G. HALNIN

Assignment No. 11 – Item no. 1

N!"AL vs. CO!RT O# APPEALS


G.R. No. 94005
April 6, 1993

#ACTS$

Someti
Sometime
me in Decemb
December
er 1974,
1974, ater
ater trial
trial an! "earin
"earin#,
#, t"e t"en $o%rt
$o%rt o &irst
&irst 'nstan
'nstance
ce (no)
(no)
Re#ional *rial co%rt+ ren!ere! its %!#ment in avor o private respon!ents an! or!ere! t"e
 partition o t"e propert- o t"e late &ran $. /-on
/-on an! ar- strom /-on.
/-on. *"e or!er o 
 partition )as airme! in toto b-
b - t"e $o%rt o Appeals in 2%l- 19 t"en reman!e! to t"e lo)er 
co%rt an! t)o -ears later, a )rit o eec%tion )as iss%e! b - t"e latter.

n 2%l- 17, 194, ar- /-on artin, !a%#"ter o t"e late &ran $. /-on an! ar- strom
/-on, assiste! b- "er co%nsel ile! a motion to %as" t"e or!er o eec%tion )it" preliminar-
in%nction. 'n "er motion, s"e conten!s t"at not bein# a part- to t"e above8entitle! case "er 
ri#"ts, interests, o)ners"ip an! participation over t"e lan! s"o%l! not be aecte! b- a %!#ment
in t"e
t"e sai!
sai! case
case t"at
t"at t"e
t"e or!e
or!err o eec
eec%t
%tio
ion
n is %nen
%neno
orc
rcea
eabl
blee inso
insoa
arr as "er
"er s"ar
s"are,
e, ri#"t
ri#"t,,
o)ners
o)ners"ip
"ip an! partici
participat
pation
ion is concern
concerne!,
e!, sai!
sai! s"are
s"are not "avin#
"avin# been
been bro%#"t
bro%#"t )it"in
)it"in t"e
2%ris!iction o t"e co%rt a %o. S"e %rt"er invoes Section 1, R%le 69 o t"e R%les o $o%rt.

n 2an%ar- 197, t"e lo)er co%rt iss%e! t"e assaile! or!er !irectin# t"e incl%sion o ar- /-on
artin as co8o)ner )it" a s"are in t"e partition o t"e propert-
*"e petitioner ile! an appeal beore t"e $A assailin# t"e !ecision o t"e lo)er co%rt )"et"er or 
not t"e trial co%rt ma- or!er t"e incl%sion o ar- /. artin as co8"eir entitle! to participate in
t"e partition o t"e propert- consi!erin# t"at s"e )as neit"er a part- plainti nor a part-
!een!ant in $ivil $ase No. 7 or partition an! acco%ntin# o t"e aoresai! propert- an! t"at
t"e !ecision ren!ere! in sai! case "as lon# become inal an! eec%tor-.

ISS!E$

:"et"er or not t"e proper reme!- to enorce a ri#"t o an ecl%!e! "eir to a inal an! eec%tor-
 %!#ment o partition is a motion to %as" sai! %!#ment;

HELD$

*"e $o%rt "el! in t"e ne#ative. *"e $o%rt sai! t"at )"en a inal %!#ment becomes eec%tor-, it
t"ereb- becomes imm%table an! %nalterable. *"e %!#ment ma- no lon#er be mo!iie! in an-
respect, even i t"e mo!iication is meant to correct )"at is perceive! to be an erroneo%s
concl%sion o act or la), an! re#ar!less o )"et"er t"e mo!iication is attempte! to be ma!e b-
t"e $o%rt ren!erin# it or b- t"e "i#"est $o%rt o lan!. *"e onl- reco#ni<e! eceptions are t"e
correction o clerical errors or t"e main# o so8calle! n%nc pro t%nc entries )"ic" ca%se no
 pre%!ice to an- part-, an!, o co%rse, )"ere t"e %!#ment is voi!.=

&%rt"ermore, =an- amen!ment or alteration )"ic" s%bstantiall- aects a inal an! eec%tor-
 %!#ment is n%ll an! voi! or lac o %ris!iction, incl%!in# t"e entire procee!in#s "el! or t"at
 p%rpose.=
'n t"e case at bar, t"e !ecision o t"e trial co%rt in $ivil $ase No. 7 "as become inal an!
eec%tor-. *"%s, %pon its inalit-, t"e trial %!#e lost "is % ris!iction over t"e case. $onse%entl-,
an- mo!iication t"at "e )o%l! mae, as in t"is case, t"e incl%sion o ar- /-on artin )o%l!
 be in ecess o "is a%t"orit-.

*"e reme!- o ar- /-on artin is to ile an in!epen!ent s%it a#ainst t"e parties in $ivil $ase
 No. 7 an! all ot"er "eirs or "er s"are in t"e s%bect propert-, in or!er t"at all t"e parties in
interest can prove t"eir respective claims.

You might also like