100% found this document useful (1 vote)
535 views21 pages

Justification Matrix

The document provides guidance on pay adjustment tools and mechanisms for University of Wisconsin - Madison employees. It lists different types of pay adjustments, including for equity, market factors, retention, competitive pay, and performance. For each adjustment type, it indicates when a request is needed, what evidence is required to justify the need, required supporting documentation, and the applicable HR system. All pay adjustments must be approved by the Office of Human Resources and in accordance with their pay adjustment policies.

Uploaded by

NorIshamIsmail
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
535 views21 pages

Justification Matrix

The document provides guidance on pay adjustment tools and mechanisms for University of Wisconsin - Madison employees. It lists different types of pay adjustments, including for equity, market factors, retention, competitive pay, and performance. For each adjustment type, it indicates when a request is needed, what evidence is required to justify the need, required supporting documentation, and the applicable HR system. All pay adjustments must be approved by the Office of Human Resources and in accordance with their pay adjustment policies.

Uploaded by

NorIshamIsmail
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

University of Wisconsin – Madison

Pay Adjustment Tools & Mechanisms Justification Matrix


Last Updated 12.19.2017

All pay adjustments noted in this matrix must be awarded in accordance with the Office of Human Resources Pay Adjustments Policy (OHR Policy 10.01).
The Office of Human Resources (OHR) must approve all base adjustments for UW-Madison employees outside of the pay plan. Until final approval is
obtained by OHR, no university official is authorized to promise a base adjustment to an employee.

In specific situations submitting an Overload may be more appropriate than a pay adjustment. Information on overloads may be found in HR Policy 11.02:
https://kb.wisc.edu/ohr/policies/page.php?id=53140

ELIGIBILITY: To verify which employee classes are eligible and the types of adjustment that can be awarded (base-building, lump sum), see Pay
Adjustments Tools and Mechanisms Eligibility Matrix: https://www.ohr.wisc.edu/docs/PayAdjustmentToolsMechanismsEligibilityMatrix.pdf

AMOUNT: To determine amounts that can be awarded, see Pay Adjustments Tools and Mechanisms Amount Matrix:
http://ohr.wisc.edu/docs/PayAdjustmentToolsMechanismsAmountMatrix.pdf

Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
Equity (HRS Code To correct for inequity  Evidence of necessity to  Analysis of the effect of adjustments on the All eligible
006) compared to staff of hire new employees at salary structure within the department (and Empl Classes:
similar training, higher levels; and/or division) including the effect on gender/race Rate/Title
Sample Justification experience and  Evidence of pay pay equity (must identify those receiving an System
Wording responsibilities –OR - compression between an increase and those who are not; explain why)
when inequities are employee and his/her  Identification of newly hired employees &
created by hiring new immediate subordinates or salaries (if applicable)
employees at rates peers with fewer years of  Identification of the “similarly situated group
higher than existing staff service of employees” (if applicable)
– OR – to address  Methodology/formula used to determine the
significant pay adjustments
compression.  For Faculty, see:
https://provost.wisc.edu/academic-policies-

Page 1
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
and-guidelines/standard-salary-equity-
review-policy/
 Statement regarding the performance level of
the individual (i.e. satisfactory performance)
Market Factor
Adjustment
Outside To retain an employee  Evidence of an offer of  A copy of the outside offer letter or other All eligible
Offer (HRS who has received an employment from a evidence of the offer (for example, email Empl Classes:
Code 022) offer of employment university or organization exchanges between the employee and the Rate/Title
from outside UW outside of UW System outside institution that reference salary) System
Sample System. The position  Evidence that the position offered is
Justification offered must be a comparable to current position (for example,
Wording position with a job posting or job description)
comparable duties and  Statement of the effect of adjustment on the
responsibilities, and at a salary structure within the department (and
rate higher than his/her division) including and excluding the effect
existing rate on gender/race pay equity
Retention To retain one or more  Evidence of a retention  Summary of the retention issue All eligible
(HRS Code employees when there is problem such as a recent  Statement regarding the performance level of Empl Classes:
081) a serious retention pattern of employees in the the individual (i.e. exemplary performance) Rate/Title
problem due to same discipline/unit leaving  Statement of the effect of adjustments on the System
Sample increased interest to take UW to take outside salary structure within the department (and
Justification outside positions with positions. division) including and excluding the effect
Wording comparable duties and on gender/race pay equity
responsibilities at higher
levels of pay
Competitive To retain one or more  Identification of potential  Data showing that the current salaries are All eligible
(HRS Code employees when there is retention problems based on below the external labor market Empl Classes:
080) no outside offer or peer market data  Statement regarding the performance level of Rate/Title
specific example of the individual (i.e. satisfactory performance) System
Sample current retention  Identification of individual(s) and the
Justification problems, but there is methodology/policy for the adjustments
Wording evidence of a potential
retention problem

Page 2
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
 Statement regarding the effect of adjustments
on the salary structure within the departments
including and excluding the effect on
gender/race pay equity

Performance May be awarded for  Length or frequency of the  Per OHR Policy 8.01, Managers and All eligible
(Outside of Pay achievements, based on outstanding performance; Supervisors must have completed all required Empl Classes:
Plan) (HRS Code a structured and and/or performance management activities for those Rate/Title
091)* consistent process that  Overall significance of the employees whom they supervise in order to System
links employee employee’s work products; receive a performance adjustment.
Sample Justification compensation to and/or
Wording employee performance  Regularity with which the
outstanding performance or
unique contribution is
demonstrated; and/or
 Whether employee has
acquired additional
competencies which are
both specialized and critical
in carrying out the
permanent functions of the
position

Permanent May be requested when  List of current duties  Updated version of job duties with  Academic
Change-in- a substantive change in (including percent percentages assigned. Staff and
Duties/Permanent the duties and breakdown) with a  Updated organization chart (if applicable) Limited:
Reclassification responsibilities of a comparison list of proposed Rate/Title
(may or may not position occurs duties (including percentage System
include Title change) breakdown); change in  University
(HRS Code 001) All permanent change- duties of 50% or more may Staff: CHRIS-
in-duties requests should indicate a new position, for HR
Sample Justification include a review to which recruitment may be
Wording determine if a new title required. Explanation of

Page 3
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
is appropriate based how the change-in-duties
upon the change. came to be; and
 Evidence of a substantial
change in duties (qualitative
rather than just
quantitative); and
 This is typically considered
a year or more after taking a
new position, unless there
are extenuating
circumstances

Title and/or Range Employee achieves  List of current duties  Updated version of job duties with  Academic
Change due to expected progress in the (including percent percentages assigned Staff and
Promotion/Pay area of specialty with breakdown) with a  Resume showing outside work if promotion Limited:
Progression* (HRS greater experience, comparison list of proposed request is based on work experience outside Rate/Title
Code 003) expertise, and duties (including percentage UW System and
responsibility in the breakdown); change in  Updated organization chart (if applicable) must include
Sample Justification particular position. duties of 50% or more may  Note: Progression adjustments in accordance title change for
Wording indicate a new position for with OHR Policy 10.01, V. e. do not require promotion
When a University Staff which recruitment may be the supporting documentation above  *Progression
employee in Schedule required; and adjustments in
14 or 15 is due a  Explanation of advancement accordance
progression adjustment in knowledge, skills, ability; with OHR
in accordance with OHR and Policy 10.01,
Policy 10.01, V. e.  This is typically considered V. e. require
a year or more after taking a an email to the
new position, unless there Compensation
are extenuating and Titling
circumstances Specialist
indicating an
adjustment is
necessary.

Page 4
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
Temporary The rate increase for an  List of current duties  Updated version of job duties with  Academic
Change-in-Duties employee who assumes (including percent percentages assigned including duties of the Staff and
(HRS Code 025) temporary breakdown) with a temporary assignment Limited:
responsibilities such as a comparison list of proposed  Appointment letter for acting/Interim role (if Rate/Title
temporary assignment duties (including percentage applicable) System
Sample Justification while the unit is breakdown); and  Updated organization chart (if applicable)  University
Wording recruiting for a  Explanation of how the Staff: CHRIS-
permanent position; an change-in-duties came to be, HR
assignment of an and expected duration of the
unusual, short-term or duties; and
non-recurring nature; or  Evidence of truly new duties
a temporary – not just more of the same
administrative or work duties; and
assignment  If interim duties, must have
evidence that the new duties
are only a portion of another
position (taking over
another position in its
entirety requires a Waiver)
Special Initiatives Occasionally, UW- To be determined by UW- To be determined by UW-Madison leadership All eligible
Madison will identify Madison leadership Empl
situations in which a Classes:Rate/
special campus Title System or
compensation program as instructed by
is necessary (ex. High- OHR at the
demand Fund, Critical time of
Compensation Fund) implementation

Page 5
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
Performance – Employee performs a  Division leadership may  Copy of the latest performance review All eligible
Lump Sum task or completes a large determine when to provide  Information on the completion of a large Empl Classes:
payment project and the employer lump sum adjustments. project or department event Rate/Title
would like to reward the  Statement on the employee’s performance System
(handled in work with a one-time
Additional Pay in payment. Exempt and
HRS, by OHR)* Non-Exempt
Staff eligible

Performance –
Lump Sum
Payment
Codes

HPE US Performance No IC/IC 19


HOT US Performance IC 18
UPE FAASLI Performance No IC/IC 18
UOS FAASLI Performance IC 19

Page 6
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
Supplemental Occasionally a unit may  Need for an immediate  Summary of the situation and explanation of All eligible
Lump Sum identify a situation when response by an employee why lump sum is being requested Empl Classes:
payment an exempt employee is outside normal shift, and the  Emergency Rate/Title
asked to assume work needing to be performed  Unplanned, unscheduled activity System
(handled in unplanned or additional is mission critical  Called in/held over outside of normal
Additional Pay in activities which are  No ability to adjust schedule shift/hours Exempt Staff
HRS, by OHR)** mission critical or in order to staff an event  Need for immediate response Only -
needed to maintain  Need to maintain a  And either:
coverage. minimum/required staffing  Mission-critical work as defined by Non-Exempt
level Staff receive
unit; OR
The identified categories  Need due to position vacancy  Life and/or Safety issue(s)
overtime or
are emergencies, or extended leave of absence compensatory
maintenance or events,  Maintenance of Events time per Fair
and maintaining  Management-scheduled activity (not Labor
coverage self-scheduled) Standards Act
 Need for additional staffing (FLSA) and
 No ability to adjust schedules in order to UW-Madison
staff event Overtime
 Operational Necessity Policy
 Maintain Coverage
 Need to maintain a minimum/required
staffing level; OR
 Need due to vacancy or extended leave
of absence
 Information on the duration of time spent on the
activity
 Summary of why the work is mission critical
and required work to be done immediately (if
applicable)

Page 7
Type of Pay When Request is Evidence for Need Supporting Documentation HR System Used
Adjustment Needed
Supplemental
Lump Sum
Payment
Codes

Emergency
HEM US Emergnc Adj No IC/IC 19
HZT US Emergnc Adj IC 18
UEM FAASLI Emergnc Adj No IC/IC 18
UES FAASLI Emergnc Adj IC 19

Maintenance of Events
HMA US Maint Adj No IC/IC 19
HMT US Maint Adj IC18
UMA FAASLI Maint Adj No IC/IC18
UMS FAASLI Maint Adj IC 19

Maintain Coverage
HCV US Coverg Adj No IC/IC 19
HCT US Coverg Adj IC 18
UCV FAASLI Coverg Adj No IC/IC 18
UVS FAASLI Coverg Adj IC 19

Page 8
Sample Justification wording

Equity (HRS Code 006)


Example #1: between similar staff

The Department of DEPARTMENT is requesting a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE based on internal equity between similar
staff. EMPLOYEE has satisfactory performance. EMPLOYEE is an Information Processing Consultant with a current annual
salary of $72,000, as compared with these other employees (see attached salary spreadsheet): COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #1
$75,000; COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #2 $76,000.

We request a pay increase for EMPLOYEE to $75,000, to bring him/her in line with these other similarly situated employees.
We have reviewed the impact of this adjustment on the internal equity of the Department and believe the adjustment is
needed to maintain internal equity.

Example #2: hiring new employees at higher rates

The Department of DEPARTMENT is requesting a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE based on internal equity created by hiring
new employees at higher rates. EMPLOYEE was hired as a Payroll and Benefits Specialist Advanced on July 18, 2016 and is
being compensated lower than recent new hires in the same title performing similar work who have less experience.
EMPLOYEE has satisfactory performance. His/her current rate is $25.60/hour, as compared with these other new hires (see
attached salary spreadsheet):

 COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #1 hired in January 2017 at $26.60/hour


 COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #2 hired in June 2017 at $27.00/hour
 COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #3 hired in May 2017 at $24.00/hour and is less experienced than all peers in the
Department

Page 9
Finalists during the last recruitment indicated they had received job offers for similar positions at $27.00-29.00/hour. We
request a pay increase for EMPLOYEE to an annual salary of $28.00/hour to bring him above the rate of these comparison
employees, since he/she has 4 years more experience than his peers. We have reviewed the impact of this adjustment on
the internal equity of the Department and believe the adjustment is needed to maintain internal equity.

Example #3: Compression

The Department of DEPARTMENT is requesting a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE based on internal equity compression
between employee/supervisor. EMPLOYEE has satisfactory performance. EMPLOYEE is an Outreach Program Manager II
with a current annual salary of $80,000, supervising COMPARISON EMPLOYEE #1, who was recently promoted to Outreach
Program Specialist Senior at $78,000 (see attached salary spreadsheet).

We request a pay increase for EMPLOYEE to $85,000, to increase the pay differential between EMPLOYEE and COMPARISON
EMPLOYEE #1 and bring EMPLOYEE’S pay in line with others in the same title in the division. We have reviewed the impact of
this adjustment on the internal equity of the Department and believe the adjustment is needed to maintain internal equity.

Page 10
Example #4: Faculty Salary Equity Review

An additional type of equity review specifically for Faculty; Guidelines set by Office of the Provost – see “Guidelines for
Implementation – Standard Faculty Salary Equity Review” (https://provost.wisc.edu/academic-policies-and-guidelines/standard-
salary-equity-review-policy/).

Equity Adjustment for MARTHA WASHINGTON

We request a base pay increase of $XX for Dr. MARTHA WASHINGTON. Upon completing the annual faculty salary equity
study, the Department of Money identified Dr. MARTHA WASHINGTON as a candidate for an equity increase. Dr.
WASHINGTON’S current UW base rate of $XX,XXX is low compared to peers within the department. Dr. WASHINGTON is a PhD
Associate Professor and the mean for all Associate Professor PhD faculty is $XX,XXX ($XX,XXX if Dr. WASHINGTON is excluded).

Dr. WASHINGTON, PhD is a basic science researcher appointed as an Assistant Professor in March of 2010 with an Institutional
Base Salary of $XX,XXX. She was promoted to Associate Professor in July of 2015. Dr. WASHINGTON is one of five PhD
associate professors within the Department of Money and has the lowest base salary of that group. When comparing Dr.
WASHINGTON with all PhD faculty in the department, we noted that there are four Assistant Professors that are within $5,000
or less of Dr. WASHINGTON’S salary.

[ EXPLAIN WHY/HOW COMPARABLES WERE CHOSEN, AND PROVIDE SALARY EQUITY SPREADSHEET ]: Dr. WASHINGTON has
the same research and teaching services responsibilities as that of her peers with her research time devoted to the general
field of Coins with specific expertise in the Penny. Dr. WASHINGTON has 15 awards and 65 publications. As shown below and
noted on the spreadsheet provided (”Salary Equity Review-Faculty Comparison”), duties, awards and publications relative to
comparable faculty confirm that an adjustment to maintain equity of Dr. WASHINGTON’S salary is appropriate.

Comparable Department of Money faculty members are:

1. George Washington, PhD (Associate Professor, Division of the One Dollar, $XX,XXX)

Page 11
Basic science researcher recruited in January 2010 as an Assistant Professor and promoted to Associate Professor in July
2016.
Basic Duties: This position involves research and teaching services as expected of a tenure track faculty member. Research
time devoted to the field of one dollar bills and quarters. An equitable role in the teaching activities of the Division of
the One Dollar along with fellow conference.
Number of Awards: 10; Number of Publications: 30

2. Andrew Jackson PhD (Associate Professor, Division of Twenty Dollars, $XX,XXX)


Basic science researcher recruited in August 2004 as an Assistant Professor and promoted to Associate Professor in July
2012.
Basic Duties: This position involves research and teaching services as expected of a tenure track faculty member. Research
time devoted to the general field of twenty dollar bills. An equitable role in the teaching activities of the Division of
Twenty Dollars along with fellow conference.
Number of Awards: 16; Number of Publications: 81

3. Janet Yellen PhD (Associate Professor, Division of Federal Reserve, $XX,XXX)


Psychology/social researcher recruited in August 2011 as a Visiting Associate Professor and appointed in June 2014 to her
first faculty position.
Basic Duties: This position involves research and teaching services as expected of a tenure track faculty member.
Research time devoted to the general field of money and the federal reserve. An equitable role in the teaching activities
of the Division of Federal Reserve along with guest lecturer attendance.
Number of Awards: 11; Number of Publications: 32

BACK TO EQUITY

Page 12
Market
A. Market – Outside Offer (HRS Code 022)

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to Market – Outside Offer.

EMPLOYEE received an outside offer for a comparable position from [ EMPLOYER OUTSIDE UW SYSTEM ], for a base annual
salary of $45,000, which is higher than his/her current base annual salary of $40,000. In order to retain this employee, we are
requesting to increase his/her base annual salary to $XX,XXX. This increase will match the outside offer [ OR: will not match the
outside offer but will maintain equity in the Department and/or work within budgetary limitations ]. See attached evidence of
offer [ examples: offer via letter, or offer via email ].

In his/her current position, EMPLOYEE’s primary duties at UW include [ BRIEFLY describe primary duties of current position ].
These are similar to the duties proposed in the other position, which include [ BRIEFLY describe primary duties of other position ].
See attached evidence about the duties of the other position [ examples: job posting, or job description ].

EMPLOYEE consistently has excellent performance in his/her duties. We wish to retain the employee because [ LIST REASONS
MAKING COUNTER OFFER DESIRABLE ]

In recommending this increase, the department studied the salary structure of the department, the external market and internal
equity.

B. Market - Retention (HRS Code 081)

Example #1: All Employment Categories except Faculty

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to Market – Retention.

[ PROVIDE SUMMARY OF THE RETENTION ISSUE; may include serious retention problem due to increased interest to take outside
positions with comparable duties and responsibilities at higher level of pay (examples: applying/interviewing for positions outside

Page 13
UW; being actively recruited for positions outside UW); or recent pattern of employees in the same discipline/unit leaving to take
positions outside UW. ]

EMPLOYEE consistently has excellent performance in his/her duties. We wish to retain the employee because [ LIST REASONS
FOR RETENTION ].

In recommending this increase, the department studied the salary structure of the department, the external market and internal
equity.

Example #2: Faculty

Professor LAST NAME has exceeded expectations in the areas of research, teaching and service. Professor LAST NAME has
recently been recruited by UNIVERSITY for a position as a member of their faculty. In an effort to convince Professor LAST NAME
to end negotiations for a possible outside offer with UNIVERSITY, the departmental Executive Committee voted to make a
preemptive retention offer which Dean LAST NAME authorized contingent on OHR approval.

In recommending this increase, the department studied the salary structure of the department, considered issues of equity and
the prospect of future compensation opportunities and analyzed the recent history of raises, retentions, and unsuccessful
retention efforts in the department as well as the current external market in order to set the final rate.

C. Market – Competitive (HRS Code 080)

Example #1: All Employment Categories except Faculty

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to Market – Competitive.

Market data for TITLE in the Educomp Salary Survey (Public Doctoral $1-$10 billion budget) shows a median of $85,000, well
above EMPLOYEE’s rate of $80,000. This gap in pay raises retention concerns for this position, and we request to increase
EMPLOYEE’s base pay to $XX,XXX to address this.

Page 14
EMPLOYEE consistently has excellent performance and we wish to retain her. [ PROVIDE REASONS FOR RETENTION ]

In recommending this increase, the department studied the salary structure of the department, the external market and internal
equity.

Example #2: Faculty

Professor NAME has exceeded all expectations as a faculty member in the Department of DEPARTMENT in the areas of research,
teaching and service. His/Her service to the profession and department has been exemplary. [ PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF
EXEMPLARY SERVICE, for example: He/She is a prolific scholar of AREA OF EXCELLENCE who has published extensively in his/her
field. He/She is an excellent undergraduate teacher and taken the lead teaching courses that prepare our undergraduate
students for careers and graduate students for the teaching profession. ]

With this increase, his/her pay rate will be at $XX,XXX, below the 2015-16 AAUDE average of $XX,XXX [ Note: OHR HAS AAUDE
DATA ]. In recommending this increase, the department carefully studied the salary structure of the department, considered
issues of equity and the prospect of future compensation opportunities and analyzed the recent history of raises and retention
efforts in the department as well as the external market, in order to set the final rate.

BACK TO MARKET

Performance (Outside of Pay Plan) (HRS Code 091)


The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to performance.

NAME received a favorable performance evaluation on DATE. Her performance is excellent and the expectation is that it will
continue. [ INCLUDE 1-2 SENTENCES JUSTIFYING THE PERFORMANCE INCREASE; Example: NAME meets all expectations, and has

Page 15
an excellent teaching range with good teaching evaluations. She has a substantial output of books, articles, etc. and is a valuable
asset to the department. ]

BACK TO PERFORMANCE

Permanent Change-in-Duties/Permanent Reclassification may or may not include Title Change (HRS Code 001)
Example #1: All Employment Categories except University Staff

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase [ If applicable: and a change in title from CURRENT TITLE to NEW
PROPOSED TITLE ] for EMPLOYEE due to Permanent Change in Duties/Reclassification.

EMPLOYEE began employment as a CURRENT TITLE with UW Madison, Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. The primary
function of this position was [ LIST PRIMARY DUTIES/FUNCTION ].

EMPLOYEE has taken on new responsibilities.

1. [ Describe and list the new duties, and what changed to result in these new duties for this employee. ]
2. [ Explain how these new duties became associated with this person's position. ]
3. [ If New Title is proposed: Explain how the new duties are more appropriate with the title of NEW PROPOSED TITLE, and
show and provide examples of how the employee meets criteria from Title Guidelines/Title Descriptions ]
These new duties represent significant additions and broaden the scope of this employee’s position, and contribute to the
success of our organization.

[ Note: The new duties must also be added into the “Duties” tab. Provide organizational chart if applicable. ]

Page 16
Example #2: University Staff

[ Under “Logical and Gradual Changes” ] The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase [ If applicable: and a
change in title from CURRENT TITLE to NEW PROPOSED TITLE ] for EMPLOYEE due to Permanent Change in
Duties/Reclassification.

EMPLOYEE began employment as a CURRENT TITLE with UW Madison, Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. The primary
function of this position was [ LIST PRIMARY DUTIES/FUNCTION ].

EMPLOYEE has taken on new responsibilities.

4. [ Describe and list the new duties, and what changed to result in these new duties for this employee. ]
5. [ Explain how these new duties became associated with this person's position. ]
6. [ If New Title is proposed: Explain how the new duties are more appropriate with the title of NEW PROPOSED TITLE, and
show and provide examples of how the employee meets criteria from Title Guidelines/Title Descriptions ]

[ Under “Reclassification Summary” ] These new duties represent significant additions and broaden the scope of this
employee’s position, and contribute to the success of our organization.

[ Note: The new duties must also be added into the “Duties” tab. Provide organizational chart if applicable. ]

BACK TO PERMANENT CHANGE IN DUTIES

Title and/or Range Change due to Promotion/Progression (HRS Code 003)


A. Faculty

Page 17
Promotion from [ choose one: Assistant Professor C40NN to Associate Professor C30NN; or Associate Professor C30NN to
Professor C20NN ] was approved by Dean and will become effective DATE. Documentation is stored at the school, college or
division.

B. Limited
n/a – Limited titles are not in Promotion/Progression series (might be a permanent change in duties resulting in a new title)

C. Academic Staff

1. Category A Professional Academic Staff

A. Promotion to NO-PREFIX (must have at least one year of relevant, comparable, exempt-level experience)

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase and a change in title from CURRENT TITLE to NEW
PROPOSED TITLE for EMPLOYEE due to promotion/progression.

EMPLOYEE began her/his employment with Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. During this time, EMPLOYEE has
achieved a level of competence and independence that are expected and appropriate of NEW PROPOSED TITLE.

EMPLOYEE has obtained experience and has developed considerable expertise in her/his work on LIST DUTIES/AREAS OF
FOCUS. Additionally, EMPLOYEE works independently in applying approaches, processes, methods and techniques and has
been active in assisting with the development of new approaches as evidenced by [ LIST AN EXAMPLE OR TWO ].

B. Promotion to SENIOR (must have 7 years of relevant, comparable, exempt-level experience)

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase and a change in title from CURRENT TITLE to NEW
PROPOSED TITLE for EMPLOYEE due to promotion/progression.

EMPLOYEE began her/his employment with Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. [ IF EMPLOYEE DOES NOT HAVE THE
REQUIRED YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN POSITIONS AT UW: Additionally, EMPLOYEE has previous relevant work experience at

Page 18
LAST EMPLOYER performing similar DUTIES. (Provide Resume) ]. During this time, EMPLOYEE has had a consistent record of
exemplary performance, as evidenced by performance evaluations, and has achieved a level of competence and
independence that are expected and appropriate of NEW PROPOSED TITLE.

EMPLOYEE has obtained extensive experience, operates at a high level of proficiency and has advanced knowledge and
skills. EMPLOYEE develops new approaches, processes, methods and techniques that has been evidenced by [ PROVIDE
EXAMPLES OF WORK ]. EMPLOYEE is expected to cope independently with new and unexpected complex situations. [ IF
APPLICABLE: EXPLAIN HOW EMPLOYEE GUIDES/TRAINS OTHER EMPLOYEES. ]

2. Distinguished Prefix – selected Category A or B Academic Staff

Distinguished prefix nomination packet was sent to the Secretary of the Academic Staff for evaluation by the
Distinguished Prefix Review Committee.

3. All other Academic Staff

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase and a change in title from CURRENT TITLE to NEW
PROPOSED TITLE for EMPLOYEE due to promotion/progression.

EMPLOYEE began her/his employment with Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE.

[ SHOW AND PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF HOW EMPLOYEE MEETS CRITERIA FROM TITLE GUIDELINES, FOR PROPOSED
LEVEL: https://www.ohr.wisc.edu/polproced/UTG/CritPrefxScopLevl.html ]

BACK TO TITLE OR RATE CHANGE/PROMOTION

Page 19
Temporary Change-in-Duties (HRS Code 025)

Example #1: All Employment Categories except University Staff

The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to Temporary Change in Duties.

EMPLOYEE began his/her appointment with Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. The primary function of this position was [
LIST PRIMARY DUTIES/FUNCTIONS ]. EMPLOYEE has taken on new responsibilities that represent a substantial qualitative change
in the position.

EMPLOYEE’S new duties include [ BRIEFLY LIST NEW DUTIES AND EXPLAIN HOW THEY CAME TO BE ].

[ Note: these new duties must also be added into the “Duties” tab in the position description. Provide organizational chart if
applicable. ]

Example #2: University Staff

Under “Logical and Gradual Changes”: The Department of DEPARTMENT requests a base pay increase for EMPLOYEE due to
Temporary Change in Duties. EMPLOYEE began his/her appointment with Department of DEPARTMENT on DATE. The primary
function of this position was LIST PRIMARY DUTIES/FUNCTIONS. EMPLOYEE has taken on new responsibilities that represent a
substantial qualitative change in the position.

Under “Reclassification Summary”: EMPLOYEE’S new duties include [ BRIEFLY LIST NEW DUTIES AND EXPLAIN HOW THEY CAME
TO BE ].

[ Note: these new duties must also be added into the “Duties” tab in the position description. Provide organizational chart if
applicable. ]

Page 20
BACK TO TEMPORARY CHANGE IN DUTIES

Page 21

Common questions

Powered by AI

UW-Madison's strategies for performance and retention involve structured compensation adjustments linking pay to demonstrated performance, addressing retention concerns proactively. Performance-based increments reward extraordinary achievements based on consistent criteria, emphasizing performance management. Retention strategies tackle potential attrition by aligning salaries with market rates without the need for external offers, thereby stabilizing the workforce. Documentation for both strategies includes performance evaluations and market data, ensuring fair, transparent procedures fostering employee loyalty and organizational stability .

For permanent reclassification pay adjustment at UW-Madison, the job duties must have changed significantly, justifying a new title or pay scale. The process involves listing current versus new duties with percentage breakdowns and explaining how these new responsibilities emerged. If reclassification is pursued, documentation should demonstrate how the new duties fit the criteria for a new title and provide an organizational chart to illustrate changes. This thorough documentation ensures transparency and fairness in the reclassification process .

Eligibility criteria for pay adjustments at UW-Madison depend on the type of adjustment: equity adjustments address staff discrepancies; market factor adjustments aim to retain employees with external offers; and retention adjustments target individuals when retention problems arise due to comparable outside offers. Eligibility matrices define which employee classes can receive these adjustments, while corresponding documentation ensures these increments are based on justified needs, aligning with departmental salary structures for equity and market standards .

A pay adjustment based on the market factor at the University of Wisconsin - Madison requires evidence of an employment offer from outside the UW System for a similar position with higher pay. Justification includes providing a copy of the offer letter or documentation of job responsibilities that are comparable to the current role. Moreover, the impact on the department's salary structure regarding gender and race equity must be considered .

For a temporary change-in-duties pay increase, the University of Wisconsin - Madison requires a request detailing the substantial qualitative change in the employee's responsibilities. Documentation must include listing new duties, explaining their temporary nature, and updating the position description's "Duties" tab. An organizational chart may also be necessary to visualize the change in roles. This process ensures that employees are fairly compensated for temporary role expansions without permanent reclassification .

UW-Madison tackles retention issues by providing competitive adjustments even without external job offers. Evidence required includes identification of potential retention problems using peer market data, showing current salaries are below market levels, and outlining individual's satisfactory performance. Documentation must forecast how these adjustments could influence departmental salary structures in terms of gender/race equity. These measures aim to proactively retain talent by aligning with market standards before competitors offer employment .

Performance-based pay adjustments outside the regular pay plan at UW-Madison are awarded for achievements linking compensation to performance. Criteria include the duration and significance of performance achievements, the regularity of such performance, acquired specialized competencies, and completion of all performance management activities by supervisors. Justification for such adjustments must reference these criteria and confirm satisfactory or exemplary performance .

Supplemental lump-sum payments at UW-Madison are issued for unplanned, mission-critical activities that demand immediate employee response. Situations justifying these payments include emergencies, staffing shortages, or unscheduled tasks crucial for operational continuity. Documentation encompasses summarizing the situation, explaining its criticality, detailing the time commitment involved, and justifying urgency using available schedules and mission-critical definitions per unit standards .

Equity pay adjustments at UW-Madison are intended to correct disparities where employees with similar qualifications and responsibilities are paid differently, or when new hires receive higher salaries than existing staff, possibly causing significant pay compression. Required documentation includes analysis on salary structure impacts, identification of new hire salaries, and methodology used for determining adjustments, alongside stating how these adjustments affect gender/race pay equity .

Adjustments for competitive market environments at UW-Madison involve evidencing potential retention issues using market data and illustrating pay discrepancies with external standards. Justifications rely on recognizing the threat of losing staff to higher-paying positions elsewhere. Additionally, documentation considers performance levels and potential impacts on internal pay structures and equity. These adjustments align salaries with market norms proactively, retaining talented staff by avoiding pay-related attrition .

You might also like