Khmer Mentality
Khmer Mentality
(Based on a 1997 translation of the original Khmer text, "Proloeng Khmer," published in 1973)
A principal component of the Khmer mentality is matriarchy. At all levels of organization within Khmer
society, ranging from family life to national government, the accepted leader or decision-maker is a
woman.
This pattern dates back to the beginnings of our recorded history. During the Funan Period we had as our
monarch a queen known variously as "Soma," "Liev Yi," or "Neang Neak." An Indian prince known as
"Kaodinhya" (Indian name), "Hun Tien" (Chinese name), or "Preah Thong" (traditional Khmer name)
conquered the nation of Funan and eventually married the Khmer queen. During the wedding the prince
followed the queen, and held on to the edge of her scarf so as not to be distracted by his surroundings.
Our Khmer ancestors carved this story into the walls of Angkor to remind us of the ancient origins of our
matriarchy. At present-day royal weddings, custom still requires the groom to hold the edge of the bride's
scarf. For ordinary people as well, matriarchy is a basic principle of social organization. This can be seen
in the titles of important positions, in educational maxims, and in common social beliefs.
D) An educational maxim:
"It is better to face a shipwreck than to have the house burn down." (meaning: it is better to
lose the father than the mother, because the father is less important.)
The wife is the chief of the family, while the husband seeks work outside the home in order to bring money
back to her. If the sum is less than expected, his wife may chastise him. Khmer wives have the
personality of "master-wife." In contrast, in Chinese society the husband controls the family's finances,
and Chinese wives have the personality of "slave-wife."
According to current research into our national history, a second element of the Khmer mentality is a
"hidden strength," which has kept the nation from perishing despite repeated attacks from the outside
world. We are now asking ourselves, "What is this hidden strength?"
Many academics, as well as other citizens who are concerned with the nation's future integrity, are now
searching for the source of this defensive power. Historical research tells us that the Khmer nation has
repeatedly been invaded. In some of these periods the Khmer were enslaved by the Thai. The
successive Khmer capitals of Angkor and Longvek were subjected to terrible devastation. The great sages
and scholars were taken prisoner and sent to serve in the invaders' country. How have the Khmer land and
the Khmer people survived to the present day?
These case studies show that the Khmer have a hidden quality of persistence, which gives them defensive
strength and keeps the Khmer nation from falling. For this reason our ancestors created the popular
proverb, "The Khmer territories will never perish." The very fact that they had the confidence to say this
clearly indicates the strength contained in the Khmer mentality. Yet, we no longer know the exact nature of
this essential, hidden strength, nor exactly where it resides in the Khmer identity.
Only when we find this hidden part of the Khmer spirit can we continue to protect our land and our nation
from danger. Until then, we will have no reason to believe the optimistic proverb mentioned above. The
Khmer spirit and identity are tightly intertwined with our culture and civilization.
The third element of the Khmer mentality, based ultimately on considerations of geography, lies in the fact
that the Khmer have considerable pride, and have a strong inclination to praise themselves. This is
because the Khmer people originally belonged to an ethnic family known as the Mon-Khmer, which
inhabited the entire peninsula of Indochina. At that time the region was called Sovanna Phum ('Golden
Country'), and shared a border with China.
The name comes from the Pali words sovann, meaning 'gold', and phum, meaning 'land' or 'country'.
People living in the Golden Country of Sovanna Phum led joyful lives, blessed with natural riches, and in
their unconscious mind there slowly developed a high level of pride, as well as a tendency to boast. The
inhabitants of Sovanna Phum belonged to three different ethnic groups: the Mon, the Cham, and the
Khmer. They lived in tribal communities, without clear land boundaries, and mainly traded gold with the
Portuguese, who traveled by sail in the China Sea.
The people of the Golden Country had no concerns other than the gold trade. This is what gave rise to
their boastful attitude, and to the development of a high level of pride. In this respect the Mon ranked first,
followed by the Cham and then the Khmer, who were the humblest of the three. Nonetheless, the Khmer
were firmly trapped in the same up-bringing, and our Khmer ancestors made this explicit in the following
parable:
According to this saying, the self-praise of the Khmer went as high as the clouds, but not so high as the
sky or the heavens. Moreover, the Khmer usually came back down to earth quickly: They boasted, but
then returned to reality. When the Khmer spoke among themselves, they did not realize that they were
boasting, because they shared a common level of pride. But when they spoke with the Cham, who were
even prouder, they could see that the Cham liked to boast. Likewise, the Cham did not see themselves as
a boastful people, but when they spoke with the Mon, they did notice that the Mon were remarkably fond
of boasting.
The Mon boasted more than anyone else, until they lost all their land.
The Cham, second only to the Mon in boasting, lost their land, too.
The Khmer boasted only moderately, and thus retained some of their land.
Yet, by no means should we expect the Khmer to retain their remaining land forever. At present the Khmer
nation is headed for catastrophe.
How did boasting cause these three ethnic groups to lose so much of their land? The answer goes
something like this. As they continued boasting and enjoying their natural resources, they forgot that the
surrounding ethnic groups coveted their land. The Thai, who originated in China's southern province of
Yunnan, became known in the Eighth Century when they started to migrate southward. When the
Mongolians invaded China in the Thirteenth Century, the Thai took advantage of the resulting chaos and
attacked the city of Sukhotey. They took over all the Mon areas, and also conquered a number of northern
Khmer provinces beyond the Danrek Mountains, along the Semourn River. These included Nokoreach,
Surin, Sangkeas, Kouk-khan, Sisaket, and Burirum. Moreover, they extended their control into
southwestern areas, as far as Malaysia. All of this territory had belonged to the Sovanna Phum Peninsula.
Later, in 1794 and 1795, three Khmer aristocrats were competing for state power. Each considered
himself superior to the others, because all three belonged to an unconditionally proud people. One of the
aristocrats, Ben, tricked another, Sous, into assassinating the third, Mou. Afterwards Ben tried to kill Sous,
but failed, because the latter had strong allies. Ben then requested the help of the Thai army, whom he
allowed to enter Cambodia. In exchange for their help, Ben let Thailand annex several Khmer provinces,
including Battambang, Mongkolburi, and Serisophan.
What led these Khmer aristocrats to fight one another for power? In that day there was an active race for
power based on self-proclaimed superiority, with assistance from foreign armies. The aristocrats had
placed on the throne a six-year-old prince named Ang Eng, the son of Prince Otey II, who was too young to
rule. Their goal was to seize power for themselves.
Thus, we can see from history that foreign invasions of the Khmer territory were possible only because
Khmer leaders were stubbornly convinced of their own superiority, and failed to realize that the country was
headed for disaster.
The Khmer fondness for boasting is also well-documented, for instance, in such ethical poems as
"Father's Testament," "Rules for Children and Grandchildren," "Fable for Children and Grandchildren,"
and "Conduct Rules for Men." All these writings seek to awaken the Khmer people from their dreams of
self-praise and irrational pride.
"Father's Testament":
DO NOT BOAST ABOUT YOUR STRENGTH...
Another example comes from an academic conference held at Chakdhumuk Hall on 9 November 1970,
where a Buddhist monk argued that the Khmer language "has excellent linguistic rules that are superior to
those of any human language in the world [sic]."
Further discussion of our people's taste for boasting can be found in a recently published book by Mr. Bun
Chan Mol, The Character of the Khmer.
The fourth element of the Khmer mentality is a link to agriculture. From the beginning, Khmer society
relied almost exclusively on agriculture, and eventually it took agriculture as an important source of cultural
identity. All aspects of Khmer education have their "roots" in agriculture, because the Khmer have a
strong tendency to use agricultural metaphors in explanations.
The fifth element of the Khmer mentality, due once again to considerations of geography, is a relative
indifference to laws and regulations. Why should this be so? The Khmer region is seldom threatened by
Freezing winters
Earthquakes
Volcanic eruptions
Savage storms
Typhoons
Large-scale floods
The Khmer territory seldom faces such disasters. Indeed, natural disasters are almost unheard of, aside
from minor floods that occur every few decades, and even they are not especially brutal.
The climate is so warm that Khmer people can survive without clothing. The only significant "earthquakes"
are caused by bombs dropped by B-52's, which come day and night, destroying both the farmland and the
occupants of many villages.
Because the Khmer countryside is rarely subjected to natural catastrophes, the Khmer people are less
aware of nature, and have little need to adjust themselves to natural constraints. This exemption from
constraints has shaped the Khmer mentality, making it insensitive to social and legal rules except where
there is coercion. This stands in contrast to countries in colder regions, where people cannot even survive
without appropriate clothing.
Yet, people from those regions who migrate to the Khmer territory eventually adopt a mindset similar to the
Khmer people's. Likewise, Khmer people who go to live in colder regions eventually adopt the mindset of
the people there. Thus, the fifth element of the Khmer soul is explained by geographical conditions.
The sixth element of the Khmer mentality is inactivity. Because the Khmer people live in the tropics, they
tend to avoid physical exertion. The Khmer artistic spirit dwells in a soft, fanciful, and romantic state, one
that is low in energy. Khmer music tends to be sentimental, and to make people sleepy.
Khmer people move slowly. They set off for the workplace at a relaxed pace, as if they were on vacation.
These factors have shaped the Khmer mentality to prefer people who are inactive rather than active,
conservative rather than progressive.
Examples:
The Khmer admire people who work less and earn more, rather than people who work hard and earn little.
Likewise, the Khmer admire a government official who simply signs a document and earns millions of riels,
rather than one who works from morning till evening and hardly earns enough to survive. In fact they
should appreciate the latter, who makes a personal sacrifice and saves money for the national budget.
Yet, if an educator and a customs official simultaneously ask to marry a family's daughter, the former will
end in despair. Where does this come from?
Shall we continue with this lifestyle, spoiled by nature? Or shall we try to win out over nature? Shall we
destroy this root of the Khmer mentality, or leave it undisturbed? The solution lies mainly in the awareness
of Khmer youngsters, but the right awareness will be possible only after education – that is, after
enlightenment. If we lack enlightenment, our minds may unconsciously drift in the wrong direction. Being
blind or ignorant is a great evil, and allows other people to manipulate us easily.
The authors of Khmer folktales exhibit this aspect of the Khmer mentality in the following ways:
Another example is an old Khmer saying that tells us, "A sage falls into a hole, while a fool rises up to
paradise." Shall we retain this root of the Khmer mentality, or cut it off?
The seventh root of the Khmer mentality is a tendency to be confused about commitments.
This is because the Khmer people live in a country in which the various seasons are not clear-cut: the rainy
season and the dry season, as well as the cold season, start and end at fuzzy dates, known to no one. In
contrast, countries in colder regions have clear-cut seasons. For example, on the European continent:
Clear-cut seasons have trained the people of that region to have clear plans:
In France it is almost impossible to find a restaurant that serves anything more than drinks before 9AM, or
after 10PM. The Khmer region's fuzzy seasons have spoiled the minds of the people living there, with
fuzziness in all aspects of commitment:
In order to correct this root of the Khmer mentality, it is necessary to impose truly strict laws, and also to
have good examples from the top down.
The eighth element of the Khmer mentality is an ambivalent extremism. Khmer extremist thinking is not
always oriented in one particular direction. When we come to like something, we go out of our way to stick
to it. But when we start to dislike it, we go far in the opposite direction.
The more loving, the more hating. For example, in the story of "Tum and Teav," Teav's mother
initially loved Tum so much that she asked him to become her adopted son. But when she
started to dislike him, she sought to have him killed in an extremely violent way.
Teav's mother: "OR-CHOUN, YOU HAVE POWER. WHY NOT USE IT RIGHT NOW? ARREST
THAT STUBBORN SHIT TUM. HAVE NO MERCY. ORDER YOUR MEN TO BEAT HIM, STAB
HIM, KILL HIM. HIS GUILT IS TOO HEAVY TO BE PARDONED ON EARTH" (original verse in
seven-word rhyme)
When we believe people, we believe them a hundred and twenty percent. But if we stop
believing, we stop forever.
If you drink, then drink so much that others have to carry you. If you can still walk by yourself,
then what was the point in drinking?
If you kill someone, go ahead and taste the flesh.
If you put your hand into the fish paste, go ahead and stick your whole arm in.
If you want to cut someone, go ahead – don't just pretend!
The ninth element of the Khmer mentality is the sanctity of one's "truth-word," or oath. Faithfulness to one's
word is among the principal Khmer virtues. Examination of Khmer literature indicates that this has been
true for a very long time. Some believe that it resulted from contact with Hinduism, for Hindu Brahmans
were considered the agents of God, with a mission to spread their religion, and were said to honor their
word strictly. Truth to one's word was seen as a major virtue of Hinduism, and indeed as the essence of its
theology.
We can see this philosophy in the Khmer version of an Indian legend called "Ramayana," where a king
named Preah Bat Tusarath does not dare violate his oath. The King has promised a woman named Neang
Kaikesi that he will leave his throne to a particular prince, Preah Phirut, if he wins a war with the Sun. In
Part One of "Ramayana," the city of Aiyutya is at the center of a conflict over the throne, and the solution is
for the King's oath to take priority over tradition. As a consequence, Preah Ream, Preah Laksma, and
Neang Sita have to leave the kingdom and live in the forest.
In the story of "A Young Weaver of Palm-leaf Baskets," a personal oath is once again taken as a binding
contract. The weaver is stuck at the top of a palm tree, and promises to become a slave to anyone who will
save him from falling to his death. A person passing by, riding on an elephant, takes him at his word and
initiates a rescue, without asking for any real guarantee of the promise. The elephant rider himself becomes
trapped with the weaver. The two make the same promise to four bald men, who again come to their
rescue without requiring any real guarantee, because they take the two men's promise as an oath.
In two other folk tales, "A Man and a Tiger" and "A Man and a Crocodile," the main character promises a
wild animal that he will come back and be eaten, as soon as he has written his will. In each story, the man
keeps his word. Likewise, in "Golden Arrow," a king states that he will kill anyone who interferes with his
war plan. When he discovers that his own consort, the Queen, has made this mistake, he bitterly forces
himself to keep his word, and executes her with the golden arrow.
To capture the sanctity of one's oath, the Khmer people have formulated the following proverb:
Yet, the sanctity of one's personal oath decreased somewhat after an event known as "the lord's tea-
spilling," which first occurred around 1845 under an occupying Vietnamese general, Troeung Minh Yang.
One night the general ordered his troops to behead four or five Khmer citizens, in response to an order from
the Vietnamese emperor, Ming Mang. The victims' heads were then used to support the boiler for his tea.
This practice, which continued up until the French entered our country, shook the Khmers' spirit to its very
core. In response, the Khmer people began to consider "tricky" approaches to problem-solving, as
indicated in the following saying:
Yet, the value placed on one's oath persists to this day, and has been inherited in something close to its
original form by people in rural and mountainous areas, whose strict adherence to their personal word
resembles the practice of an ascetic monk. In mountainous regions, people teach their children that a
person who fails to honor an oath cannot live on the mountain.
The tenth element of the Khmer mentality is to place a high value on chastity and purity. Indeed, the
Khmer essence is a devotion to chastity, especially in women. Khmer women work incredibly hard to
preserve their chastity, including, of course, their physical purity, or virginity. Correspondingly, Khmer men
are inclined to accept as "queen" of their heart only a woman of fairly complete chastity, for which bodily
purity is a necessary condition.
When a single woman loses her purity, she generally believes that her body has no more worth, having lost
its essence. Her life becomes meaningless, and she sometime tries to end it through suicide. This stands
in stark contrast to European women, who generally accept the loss of bodily purity as a natural event in
their life, and who are more inclined to value the reality of their heart, which they consider the essence of
their life.
Khmer people place greater value on the quality of the body, than on the quality of the heart. There are
those who believe that this emphasis on bodily essence has its roots in Brahmanism, for the Brahman
likewise values bodily essence as a principal quality of Brahmanhood. Yet, we believe that such a transfer
of values is possible only when the recipient was, at some level, already thinking along similar lines.
The existence of this value in the Khmer mentality is noted in many works of Khmer literature:
In the story of "Ramayana," when Preah Ream takes refuge in a forest, his wife Neang Sita
accompanies him.
In the story of "Preah Vesantar," when Preah Vesantar is exiled to a forest, his wife Neang Metri
goes with him.
Some people think that these stories are influenced by Indian thought. Yet, acceptance by one country of
another country's influence, whether in beliefs, customs, religion, or ideology, is possible only when the
influence is compatible with the accepting country's pre-existing ideas. Hence, we conclude that Khmer
women's devotion to chastity existed even before the Indian influence, which simply added new momentum
to our own way of thinking, and led to a greater fondness for stories that praise this value.
For example:
In the story of "Tum and Teav," which is a purely Khmer love story, we see the Khmer woman's
devotion to chastity clearly in the deeds of Neang Teav. When she learns that her lover Tum
has been executed with a knife, she follows him by cutting her own throat with a knife.
In the story of "Sophat," Neang Manyan believes that Sophat has drowned, and follows her
sweetheart by drowning herself in a river.
Now, what evidence do we have that this characteristic is invariably present? One piece of evidence
comes from the present-day rotation of Khmer soldiers through different locations, which is required by
different missions of the armed forces. As the husbands respond to various dangers, the wives follow
them and devote themselves to providing support. Despite the challenges to family finances, and the
difficulty of constantly changing their habits and lifestyle, Khmer women take this devotion as their highest
priority, and thereby preserve their chastity.
********************
*********************