Supporting multi-tasking of activities
Dr. Víctor M. González
Interactive Systems Design Group
University of Manchester
[email protected] Overview
> Some characteristics of multi-tasking
> Office work: multi-tasking research
> Sphere Juggler
Challenges to support Multi-tasking
• Information workers have to cope with the
demands emerging by the multiple activities they
are engaged in.
• Current designs of information technology do not
provide a comprehensive support for the
management of activities.
• There is a lack of comprehensive understanding of
the phenomenon of managing multiple activities.
Office work: Multi-tasking research
The area of study:
• Personal activity management
• Modern information workers
The approach taken
• Systematic observation of 36 information workers as
they conducted their activities in the workplace
• Interviews to discuss various aspects of the
phenomenon, as well as reflective accounts about
observations
• Informants included software developers, financial
analysts, support engineers, projects leaders and
managers.
Office work: Multi-tasking research
Average continuous time spent on actions before switching
% entire Avg. Time/Day Avg. Time/ Action
Actions
day (sd) (sd)
Using phone 7.6 0:39:48 (0:29:10) 0:03:02 (0:01:28)
Using e-mail 8.3 0:43:31 (0:20:27) 0:02:04 (0:00:42)
Using PCs 27.8 2:26:21 (1:08:23) 0:02:30 (0:00:45)
Using paper documents 6.6 0:34:51 (0:25:10) 0:01:50 (0:00:52)
Using other tools 0.8 0:04:02 (0:03:55) 0:01:15 (0:00:43)
Talking through the walls 1.7 0:08:46 (0:10:29) 0:01:06 (0:01:14)
Talking to others in own cubicle 8.3 0:43:45 (0:29:37) 0:04:29 (0:02:49)
Formal meetings 14.3 1:15:21 (1:00:12) 0:42:56 (0:19:11)
Talking to others in other cubicles 12.4 1:05:24 (0:37:40) 0:08:21 (0:03:27)
Personal 11.2 0:59:11 (0:26:13) 0:33:32 (0:27:40)
Unknown 1.0 0:05:15 (0:08:59) 0:05:09 (0:09:05)
All actions except “Formal 73.5 0:48:19 (0:53:05) 0:03:05 (0:02:51)
meetings”, “Personal” and
“Unknown”
All actions total 100% 0:47:51 (0:51:48) 0:09:40 (0:17:19)
Office work: Multi-tasking research
Moving beyond actions: the need for a notion
Phone call with client
+
Meeting with developer
+
Composing e-mail message
=
Client’s problem with system
• The analysis was oriented toward understanding how
actions were related to other actions around practical
units of work: working spheres
Office work: Multi-tasking research
Average no. working spheres and segment for all informants
Avg. Time/W.S.
Type of working Avg. #. W.S. Avg. Total Time/W.S.
per segment
sphere per day (sd) per day (sd)
(sd)
9.31 0:12:16 0:43:21
Central
(4.99) (0:03:56) (0:19:38)
2.90 0:05:34 0:08:18
Peripheral
(1.63) (0:03:43) (0:06:06)
12.22 0:10:29 0:33:58
All
(5.30) (0:02:51) (0:12:04)
Office work: Multi-tasking research
Strategies to manage activities
People gain an overview of their working spheres at the
beginning of the day/week and update it as conditions
change
Consolidation of information from many sources
Office work: Multi-tasking research
Constant renewal of overviews: different perspectives
Global: provide major summaries of the work
Local: help manage the day-to-day things
Global perspective Local perspective
Our approach: Sphere Juggler
Personal Activity Management
The approach: Sphere juggler
Initial system to support activity
switching and context recovery
Aggregation of resources around
working spheres (emails, URLs,
documents, contacts)
Implementation: Windows XP and MS
Outlook
Our approach: Sphere Juggler
Centralized Sphere Management Stepper Learning Curve
Quick Sphere Targeting Drag & Drop enabled
Document Monitoring
PIM Integration
Sphere’s space association
Quick Sphere Switching Highly Customizable
Open Docs
Active Spheres
Our approach: Sphere Juggler
Scenario
Our approach: Sphere Juggler
Personal Activity Management
PDA Version
Integration with Whiteboard
Medical Interns
Future work on this area
> Study of multi-tasking practices with information
workers (executives) in Ensenada, Mexico.
> Design of a planning and task-management tool
> Theorizing on the conceptualization of personal
activities
