1 FINAL NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR
2 EXHIBITION OF MISSING CREDENTIALS
3
4
5 TO: Mr. John S. Einhorn
6 Office of the Presiding Judge
7 San Diego Superior Court
8 P.O. Box 122724
9 San Diego 92112-2724
10 CALIFORNIA, USA
11
12 FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, Plaintiff
13 U.S. Supreme Court case #03-5070
14 Superior Court of California case #GIC807057
15
16 DATE: August 25, 2004 A.D.
17
18 SUBJECT: fraud and related criminal conduct by
19 THE OFFICE OF COURT COUNSEL,
20 Superior Court of California
21
22 Greetings Mr. Einhorn:
23
24 Due to continuing and apparently habitual violations of applicable
25 federal laws by the above mentioned employees, you are hereby notified
26 formally as follows: The absence of certain requisite credentials is
27 now a matter of certified evidence and testimony that remain
28 unrebutted in each of the two court cases listed above.
29
30 Accordingly:
31
32 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Oath of Office for
33 Mr. Dale A. Drozd. The existence of a proper Oath of Office for Mr.
34 Drozd assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the official court records
35 of the two cases in question;
36
37 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper license to practice
38 law for Mr. Dale A. Drozd. The existence of a proper license to
39 practice law for Mr. Drozd assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the
40 official court records of the two cases in question;
41
42 Demand is hereby made of you to produce the proper written consents of
43 all 129 named Defendants and one Plaintiff to the exercise of civil
44 jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate in the federal case in
45 question. The existence of proper written consents to the exercise of
46 civil jurisdiction by any U.S. Magistrates assumes facts nowhere in
47 evidence in the official court records of the two cases in question;
48
49 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Presidential
50 Commission and Oath of Office for Mr. William B. Shubb. The existence
51 of a proper Presidential Commission and Oath of Office for Mr. Shubb
52 assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the official court records of the
53 two cases in question;
1 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Presidential
2 Commission and Oath of Office for Mr. Stephen S. Trott. The existence
3 of a proper Presidential Commission and Oath of Office for Mr. Trott
4 assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the official court records of the
5 two cases in question;
6
7 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Oath of Office for
8 Mr. Procter Hug and Mr. Alfred T. Goodwin. The existence of proper
9 Oaths of Office for Messrs. Hug and Goodwin assumes facts nowhere in
10 evidence in the official court records of the two cases in question;
11
12 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Oath of Office for
13 Ms. Irma E. Gonzalez. The existence of a proper Oath of Office for
14 Ms. Gonzalez assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the official court
15 records of the two cases in question;
16
17 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Presidential
18 Commission and Oath of Office for Mr. Stephen G. Breyer, Ms. Ruth
19 Bader Ginsburg and Mr. Clarence Thomas. The existence of proper
20 Presidential Commissions and Oaths of Office for Ms. Ginsburg and
21 Messrs. Breyer and Thomas assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the
22 official court records of the two cases in question; and,
23
24 Demand is hereby made of you to produce a proper Oath of Office for
25 Mr. Anthony M. Kennedy, Ms. Sandra Day O'Connor, Mr. Antonin Scalia,
26 Mr. David H. Souter and Mr. John Paul Stevens. The existence of
27 proper Oaths of Office for Ms. O’Connor and Messrs. Kennedy, Scalia,
28 Souter and Stevens assumes facts nowhere in evidence in the official
29 court records of the two cases in question.
30
31 DEADLINE
32
33 You now have thirty (30) calendar days from the above date on this
34 NOTICE AND DEMAND to produce each and every one of the missing
35 credentials that are required by law, and are also itemized above.
36 Beyond that deadline, your silence with regard to any one of the said
37 credentials will constitute fraud, pursuant to U.S. v. Tweel, and it
38 will also activate estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen.
39
40 Thank you very much for your timely and professional consideration.
41
42
43 Sincerely yours,
44
45 /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell
46
47 Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
48 Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
49
50 All Rights Reserved without Prejudice (see UCCA 1207)
51 Notice to principals is notice to agents. Respondeat superior!
1 p.s. For your convenience, a Table of Contents
2 for each of the two cases in question is here:
3
4 [Link]
5 [Link]
6
7 copy: appropriate law enforcement officials
