Scribd
Upload
223 views5 pages

Example: Lead Compensator Design: Solution

The document describes designing three lead compensators to reduce the settling time of a system by half while maintaining 30% overshoot. Three compensators are designed with pole locations of -5, 2+5.24/tan(deg2rad(7.4755)), and 2 respectively. A fourth compensator is also designed with a pole location of 6.7. Each compensator is tested in simulation and their characteristics compared.

Uploaded by

JBBAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
223 views5 pages

Example: Lead Compensator Design: Solution

The document describes designing three lead compensators to reduce the settling time of a system by half while maintaining 30% overshoot. Three compensators are designed with pole locations of -5, 2+5.24/tan(deg2rad(7.4755)), and 2 respectively. A fourth compensator is also designed with a pole location of 6.7. Each compensator is tested in simulation and their characteristics compared.

Uploaded by

JBBAR
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Example: Lead compensator design

Design three lead compensators for the above given system that will reduce the settling
time by a factor of two while maintaining 30% overshoot. Compare the system
characteristics between the three designs.

Solution:
First determine the characteristics of the uncompensated system operating at 30%
overshoot.
30% overshoot  zeta=-log(pOS/100)/sqrt(pi^2+(log(pOS/100))^2)
ζ = 0.358  θ = 180 – cos-1ζ = 180 – rad2deg(acos(zeta)) = 180 – 69.03 = 110.9687o

The characteristics of the uncompensated system operating at 30% overshoot:


Ts = 4 / 1 = 4 (3.98) sec, Tp = π / 2.62 = 1.19 (1.31) sec.

Now let us do lead compensation.


The new Ts = 4 / 2 = 2 sec, σ = 4 / Ts_new = 4 / 2 = 2, ωd_old = 2*2.62 = 5.24
Therefore the new operating point: -2+j5.24
Design 1:
zc= -5
The pole location can be found as

–Tpc – T4 + T3 – T2 – T1 = (2k+1)π
Tpc = 7.4755  tan(Tpc) = 5.24 / (pc – 2)  pc = 2+5.24/tan(deg2rad(Tpc)) = 42
Now the gain for the compensated system
KGH=-1  K=-s1*(s1+4)*(s1+6)*(s1+42) / (s1+5) for s1=-2+5.24i
K = 1.4196e+003 -6.9737e+000i  1420 - j6.9  K = 1420
K=63.21; G=K/s/(s+4)/(s+6), T=feedback(G,1), step(T)
K1=1423; G1=K1*(s+5)/s/(s+4)/(s+6)/(s+42.96), T1=feedback(G1,1), step(T1)
K2=698.1; G2=K2*(s+4)/s/(s+4)/(s+6)/(s+20.09), T2=feedback(G2,1), step(T2)
K3=345.6; G3=K3*(s+2)/s/(s+4)/(s+6)/(s+8.971), T3=feedback(G3,1), step(T3)

Now let us do a 4th compensation:


Tpc=-rad2deg(-pi+atan(5.24/(6-2))-(pi-atan(5.24/(2-1)))+atan(5.24/(4-2))
+deg2rad(110.98)) = 48.1
pc = 2+5.24/tan(deg2rad(Tpc)) = 6.7
K= 273

G4 = K*(s+2) / s / (s+4) / (s+6) / (s+6.7)


273( s  2)
K v  lim G ( s )  lim  Kv = 3.39, ess = 0.2945,
s 0 s 0 s ( s  4)( s  6)(s  6.7)
Ts = 3.83 sec, Tp = 0.7 sec (actually it is around 7 sec)

You might also like