Decision IG.20/11 Regional Strategy Addressing Ship's Ballast Water Management and Invasive Species
Decision IG.20/11 Regional Strategy Addressing Ship's Ballast Water Management and Invasive Species
Annex II
Page 171
Decision IG.20/11
Regional strategy addressing ship’s ballast water management and invasive species
Desirous to address the risk arising from the introduction of invasive alien species through ships’
ballast water, which has been recognized as one of the four greatest threats to the world’s
oceans and which can cause extremely severe and irreversible environmental, economic and
public health impacts,
Recalling the objectives of the International Convention for the Control and Management of
Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004 and particularly its Article 13 whereby, to achieve
these objectives, “the Parties bordering enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, shall endeavor, taking
into account characteristic regional features, to enhance regional co-operation, including through
the conclusion of regional agreements”,
Further recalling Decision IG.19/11 adopted at the 16th Ordinary Meeting of the Contracting
Parties to the Barcelona Convention (Marrakesh, November 2009) to develop a regional strategy
on ships’ ballast water management in the Mediterranean within the Mediterranean Action Plan
(MAP), and which encouraged the Mediterranean GloBallast Regional Task Force to endeavor to
finalize such regional strategy as soon as possible, for possible adoption by the 17th Ordinary
Meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention;
Highlighting the relevance of the strategy to the process of gradual application by MAP of the
ecosystem approach for the management of human activities in the Mediterranean region, that
includes ecological objectives and operational objectives with associated indicators for the
introduction of non indigenous species in the ecosystem,
Noting that the Mediterranean region is one of the six high priority regions included in the
GEF/UNDP/IMO Project entitled “Building Partnerships to Assist Developing Countries to Reduce
the Transfer of Harmful Aquatic Organisms in Ships’ Ballast Water” (“GloBallast Partnerships”
Project),
Further noting that the Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the
Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC) was designated as the Regional Coordination Organization
(RCO) for the implementation of the GloBallast Partnerships Project in the Mediterranean in
collaboration with the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA),
Considering that the 10th Meeting of the Focal Points of REMPEC endorsed and recommended
the adoption of the Mediterranean Strategy on Ships’ Ballast Water Management, including its
Action Plan and Timetable, as well as the “General Guidance on the Voluntary Application of the
D1 Ballast Water Exchange Standard by Vessels Operating between the Mediterranean Sea and
the North-East Atlantic and/or the Baltic Sea” by the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona
Convention,
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 172
Recognizing the dialogue established with other Regional Seas Agreements, in order to ensure
efficient handling of the issue of ships’ ballast water management and taking into consideration
that the General Guidance Document was adopted by the Contracting Parties to the OSPAR
Convention during their last Ministerial Meeting (September 2010), and by the Contracting
Parties to the Helsinki Convention during the 32nd Meeting of the HELCOM Commission (March
2011);
Adopts the Mediterranean Strategy on Ships’ Ballast Water Management, including its Action
Plan and Timetable, as set out in Annex I to this Decision, and the “General Guidance on the
Voluntary Application of the D1 Ballast Water Exchange Standard by Vessels Operating between
the Mediterranean Sea and the North-East Atlantic and/or the Baltic Sea”, as outlined in Annex II
to this Decision, and agrees to the joint submission, with the other concerned Regional Seas
Agreements, of the General Guidance Document to the Secretary-General of the International
Maritime Organization (IMO);
Invites the Contracting Parties to take the necessary measures for its implementation;
1. The present Strategy takes into account all relevant international, regional and sub-regional
instruments and mechanisms, as well as all relevant Mediterranean action plans, policies and
decisions, including Decision IG 17/6 of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention related
to the implementation of the ecosystem approach adopted under the Barcelona Convention and its
th
protocols (adopted at their 15 Ordinary Meeting (Almeria, Spain, 15-18 January 2008, UNEP
(DEC)/MED IG.17)).
2. The Mediterranean Sea herewith refers to the Mediterranean Sea area as defined in Article 1
of the Barcelona Convention, i.e. the “maritime waters of the Mediterranean Sea proper with its
incorporated gulfs and seas, bounded to the west by the meridian passing through the Cape Spartel
lighthouse, at the entrance of the Straits of Gibraltar, and to the east by the southern limits of the
Straits of the Dardanelles between Mehmetcik and Kumkale lighthouses”.
Definition
3. For the purpose of this present Strategy, the term “invasive alien species” means “Harmful
Aquatic Organisms and Pathogens”, as defined in Article 1.8 of the 2004 International Convention for
the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM Convention).
General objective
4. The general objective of the present Strategy is to establish the framework for a regional
harmonised approach in the Mediterranean on ships’ ballast water control and management which is
consistent with the requirements and standards of the BWM Convention, as outlined in its Article 13.3.
Introduction
5. Invasive alien species have serious economic, environmental and human health impacts and
are now recognized as one of the greatest threats to biodiversity globally. In marine and coastal
environments, invasive alien species have been identified as one of the four greatest threats to the
world’s oceans. Ships’ ballast water is of particular concern as a vector of introduction of invasive alien
species in the Mediterranean Sea because of the large quantities of ballast water coming from different
marine environments around the world being discharged at Mediterranean ports. Ballast sediments are
also of concern for management as they provide a substrate for a variety of marine species, notably
dinoflagellates.
6. The 2004 BWM Convention provides a critically needed set of management tools to address
the issue and calls for regional cooperation and harmonization of policies to attempt
solving this transboundary marine environmental issue. Although the BWM Convention has not yet
entered into force, the national process of ratifications is underway in many countries. Meanwhile,
voluntary measures complying with the requirements of the Convention are needed in order to minimize
the introduction of invasive alien species in the Mediterranean Sea.
7. The present Strategy is composed of eight Strategic Priorities and of an Action Plan and
Workplan/Timetable for its implementation.
8. Growing recognition of the impacts of invasive alien species has led to a widespread
response to the issue, in the form of legal instruments as well as programmes aimed at developing
practical, technical solutions. The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992, (CBD) provides the basis
for measures to protect biodiversity against invasive alien species (Article 8 h) and comprehensive
1
Guiding Principles in this field have been adopted under this Convention in 2002 .
1
The Conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted Guiding Principles for the
Implementation of Article 8 (h). (COP 6 Decision VI/23, The Hague, 16-19 April 2002).
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 176
9. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), its member States and the maritime industry
have been working on the issue of ships’ ballast water introduction for more than twenty years, initially
developing voluntary guidelines and then developing a legally binding international regime to meet the
new challenges posed by the problem. In February 2004, these global efforts culminated with the
adoption of the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and
Sediments (BWM Convention). The Convention sets out strict treatment standards for ballast water
discharges, which, when in force, will apply to different ships at different times depending on their
construction date and their tanks’ ballast water capacity. Additionally, the Convention provides
guidance for the type approval of ballast water treatment systems and identifies detailed procedures
to ensure that the environmental toxicity of ballast water is evaluated and minimized, resulting in safe
discharges of treated ballast water. This is especially important when systems use chemical
treatment methods.
The Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention support the work for the
minimization of the introduction of invasive alien species being carried out by the
relevant organisations and forums, particularly the work of the International Maritime
Organisation (IMO) and are committed to take all appropriate actions toward the
ratification of the BWM Convention for its entry into force as soon as possible.
10. The implementation of the IMO /GEF /UNDP GloBallast Partnerships project (Building
Partnerships to Assist Developing Countries to Reduce the Transfer of Harmful Aquatic Organisms in
Ships’ Ballast Water) was initiated in 2008. The GloBallast Partnerships builds on the pilot phase and
will focus on the implementation of the BWM Convention by assisting countries to enact legal, policy and
institutional reforms to minimize the impacts of invasive alien species transferred by ships. Under this
project, a number of important activities and initiatives are being undertaken in the Mediterranean
region, which significantly help develop and strengthen the expertise within the region and the capacity
of the Mediterranean coastal States in the field of ballast water management. However, the lifetime of
the GloBallast Partnerships Project is limited and the project is expected to terminate in 2014.
The Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention stress the need to continue efforts
made in the region to enhance capacity building, knowledge transfer and training of
personnel after the GloBallast Partnerships Project terminates, and to involve relevant
international and regional co-operation mechanisms, non-governmental organisations
and agencies for the continuation of the process initiated.
11. The development and updating of knowledge in the field of ships’ mediated introduction of
invasive alien species in the Mediterranean is fundamental in order to have a sound scientific,
technical and legal basis as a solid basis for management measures. Significant progress has been
made to better understand the relation between maritime transport and invasive alien species
introduction in the marine environment of the Mediterranean. Biodiversity impacts of species
introduction and maritime traffic trends in the Mediterranean in the region have been identified and are
outlined below.
12. Research has shown that the Mediterranean marine ecosystems and resources have
been and continue to be severely compromised by invasive alien species, and remain at high
risk of further invasion as maritime traffic escalates. Zenetos and et.al (2008) have reported 903 alien
2
species in the Mediterranean basin based on literature up to April 2008. The rate of biological
invasions in the Mediterranean is estimated at one new species entry every nine days.
2
A.Zenetos, E. Meriç, M. Verlaque, P. Galli, C.-F. Boudouresque, A. Giangrande, M. E. Çınar and M. Bilecenoğlu
(2008), Mediterranean Marine Science 9/1, 119-165.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 177
13. Of these species invasions, 21 percent are believed to have arrived with vessels, however
many more have relied on the local shipping traffic for secondary spread within the Mediterranean
region. Ballast water has been implicated in many serious invasions of the region including the Comb
Jelly (Mnemiopsis leidyi), which has lead to fisheries collapse in the Black and Caspian Seas. The
Mediterranean GloBallast Task Force produced a review of scientific and technical studies related to
ships’ ballast water and invasive alien species produced by research institutes and universities of the
Mediterranean region. The review highlighted that while the introduction of invasive alien species is
well documented in certain countries, there are important information gaps in certain areas of the
Mediterranean.
14. The Mediterranean is a major shipping transit route. In 2006, around 10,000 mainly large
vessels transited the area en-route between non Mediterranean ports. Merchant vessels operating
within and through the Mediterranean are getting larger and carrying more trade in larger parcels.
Vessels transiting the Mediterranean average 50,000 DWT and are, on average, over three times
3
larger than those operating within the Mediterranean .
15. Overall vessel activity within the Mediterranean has been rising steadily over the past 10
years and is projected to increase by a further 18 per cent over the next 10 years. Transits through
the Mediterranean are expected to rise by 23 per cent. Increases in vessel activity will be coupled with
the deployment of ever larger vessels. Chemical tanker and container vessels will show the highest
rates of growth in respect of port callings within the Mediterranean over the next ten years whilst
increases in transits will be most pronounced in the product and crude tanker sector.
16. Intra-Mediterranean traffic. Seaborne trade between Mediterranean littoral States, which is
relatively underdeveloped, represents 18 per cent of the total Mediterranean littoral States’ trade. The
top 20 Mediterranean port to port trade routes measured in terms of number of voyages are
dominated by high frequency small size Intra Mediterranean passenger traffic. However, the top 20
transit routes through and voyages within the Mediterranean, measured by vessel capacity and
therefore cargo volumes, are dominated by larger tanker, container and dry bulk vessels.
17. The Mediterranean is both a major loading and unloading centre for crude oil.
Approximately 18 per cent of global seaborne crude oil shipments take place within or through the
Mediterranean. North African ports in Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Persian Gulf oil shipped via Egypt
account for over 90 per cent of all crude oil loaded in the Mediterranean. Italy accounts for nearly half
of all crude oil unloaded in the Mediterranean. Exports of crude oil from Black Sea ports averaging at
over 100 million tonnes a year are expected to continue to rise, resulting in continued seaborne
transits via the Istanbul Straits and increased use of eastern Mediterranean ports linked to new
pipelines intended to bypass the Istanbul Straits. The resumption of Iraqi crude supplies via Ceyhan in
Turkey and via Syrian ports will reverse the trend seen over recent years of declining crude exports
from these ports.
18. The efforts initiated to compile relevant data and enhance the knowledge on the above issues
are to be acknowledged, however, these efforts need to be strengthened with comprehensive species
inventories, data on species present in ports and data related to maritime traffic in the region, as well as
relevant oceanographic data. The compilation of comprehensive species inventories for individual ports
plays a significant role in ballast water management. For a port to effectively manage the ballast water
associated with its shipping movements, data must be available and complete from the local port as well
as from the source ports for the ballast water being received. It is important that the methods and
approaches used to compile a baseline list of species within a port are standardised among countries.
Port Biological Baseline Surveys (PBBS) are in this regard, an important tool for knowledge
management.
3
This paragraph as well as the following paragraphs describing the maritime traffic in the region are extracted
from the Study of Maritime Traffic Flows in the Mediterranean Sea, Final Report, REMPEC (2008).
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 178
Strategic Priority 4. Use risk assessment as a reliable tool to assist in ballast water
management decision-making and in compliance, monitoring and
enforcement procedures
19. Risk assessment and ballast water management. Risk assessment can be helpful in
ensuring that the provisions of the BWM Convention are applied in a consistent manner, based on
scientifically robust groundwork. In particular, the IMO has developed Guidelines for the
implementation of the BWM Convention under which risk assessment is needed. The Guidelines on
Designation of Areas for Ballast Water Exchange (G14) are of particular relevance for the
Mediterranean region, as these address the sea areas where a vessel cannot exchange its ballast
water and where the port State may designate areas, in consultation with adjacent or other States,
where a ship may conduct ballast water exchange. The IMO also recommends carrying out risk
assessment when a Party, within waters under its jurisdiction, is granting exemptions to ships (G7
Guidelines for Risk Assessment under Regulation A4 of the BWM Convention).
20. Risk assessment is also essential to have a sound knowledge of the overall risks for
introduction of invasive alien species associated with the maritime traffic in the Mediterranean region.
When resources are limited, management actions such as compliance, monitoring and enforcement
(CME) may be prioritized according to the higher risk areas or vessels.
21. Biological invasion of ports. Major shipping ports are often the first places where invasive
alien species are introduced and become established. Port Biological Baseline Surveys (PBBS) are
used to develop a baseline list of species – both native and non-native – that are present in a shipping
port. Subsequent long-term monitoring regimes should be put in place to continue building an
information base in this field and detect any new invasions. This data can be used to communicate risks
to other shipping ports or countries, as appropriate, and provide an essential reference point for
management of non-native species. As they target marine pests, PBBS can also help raise awareness
of marine pest issues within the region. Most importantly, they allow any existing introductions to be
recorded, tracked, and managed.
22. Ports at risk of biologic invasion. Some Mediterranean ports are more at risk of biological
invasion as they are ports receiving greater volumes of ballast water originating from ports located
outside the Mediterranean sea. These ports are the following: Arzew, Sidi Kerir Terminal, Algeciras,
Tripoli, Eleusis, Ceyhan, Port de Bouc, Banias, Brindisi, and Bizerta. It has been estimated that 69%
of the ballast water received by Mediterranean ports concerns three countries: Algeria, Egypt and
Libya, as these countries host important oil terminals, where oil tankers arrive on ballast to load cargo.
It has to be noted that the coast line of these three countries forms almost all the south coastline of
the Mediterranean. In addition, it should be noted that once an invasive alien species is introduced in
one port located in the Mediterranean Sea, there is a risk of secondary introduction of other ports
4
located within the region .
Strategic Priority 5. Decide upon voluntary regional arrangements in the Mediterranean and
ensure sub-regional and national strategies are in line with these
23. Given the transboundary nature of invasive alien species issue, it must be recognized that
individual countries cannot effectively address this concern on their own. A harmonized regional
ballast water management regime has to be agreed upon by the Mediterranean coastal States, which
takes into account the maritime traffic lanes in the region and the origin and distribution of ballast
water in the ports of the region, as well as the particular geographical constraints of the area and
associated scientific and oceanographic data.
4
This section is based on the result of a study on ballast water origins and volumes in the Mediterranean, which
was carried out by Mr. Bouteville for REMPEC in 2008, using the Study of Maritime Traffic Flows in the
Mediterranean Sea, Final Report, REMPEC (2008).
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 179
24. As the BWM Convention is not yet in force, voluntary measures are called for in order to
address the ships’ ballast water mediated introduction of invasive alien species in the Mediterranean
Sea. In addition, harmonised procedures incorporated in a compliance, monitoring and enforcement
(CME) system should be implemented by all countries of the region. Sub-regional approaches within
the Mediterranean Sea area (e.g. the BWM Sub Commission in the Adriatic Sea) are also encouraged
and existing sub-regional agreements in the Mediterranean region should consider integrating BWM
issues in their work, in coherence with the regional approach adopted. National strategies established
by Mediterranean coastal States should take into account and be consistent with the policy and
arrangements agreed upon at sub-regional and regional levels.
25. Harmonization of approaches to ballast water management across regional seas is essential
to help achieve the goals of the BWM Convention. Communication and alignment with neighbouring
regions and their BWM structures (e.g. PERSGA Strategic Action Plan for the Red Sea and Gulf of
Aden, the Black Sea Strategy) is needed to ensure consistency between the regimes, and also to
promote sharing of information between these interlinked marine regions. A dialogue should also be
established with other relevant regional seas Secretariats such as the OSPAR Commission for the
North-East Atlantic, which agreed in June 2007 on “General Guidance on the Voluntary Interim
Application of the D1 Ballast Water Exchange Standards in the North-East Atlantic”, the Helsinki
Commission (HELCOM) for the Baltic Sea, which developed a roadmap towards a harmonised
implementation of the IMO BWM Convention, and the ROPME Sea Area which recently adopted
regional measures on ballast water management exchange.
The Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention are committed to enhance and
maintain cooperation with the neighbouring regions of the Mediterranean Sea and with
other relevant regional agreements in order to ensure that the measures adopted are
consistent with other ballast water management regional arrangements.
Strategic Priority 7. Keep the Strategy and Action plan under review and assess their
implementation progress
26. The Strategy and Action Plan should be subject to periodic review to take into account
emerging issues, outcomes of research and development (R&D) activities and experience gained
from its operation and implementation.
The Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention call for regular meetings with the
purpose of reviewing and evaluating the ongoing relevance of the Strategy, and overall
effectiveness of activities carried out under the Action Plan, and that the work
accomplished in the various regional seas regarding the management of ballast water
is on the agenda of meetings and forums gathering the various regional Secretariats
and agreements.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 180
28. The identification and securing of adequate resources for implementing the Strategy and
Action Plan should be investigated from various sources, including IMO, REMPEC, and other MAP
Regional Activity Centres, regional and international shipping and port industries, bilateral and
multilateral donors and technical cooperation programmes.
The present Action Plan identifies eight main measures to be taken at regional level, sub-regional or
national level in accordance with the Strategic Priorities, and include a workplan/ timetable for their
implementation (Annex I).
Action 1. Ratify the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’
Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM Convention)
The urgent ratification of the BWM Convention is called for in order that, when it enters into force, the
treatment standards for ballast water discharges become applicable to ships. To help the process out
at national level, national policy initiatives preparing the ground and leading to the ratification should
be undertaken.
a) to form a national policy working group to lead the process towards the ratification of the
BWM Convention;
b) to draft the instrument of ratification for adoption through the proper channels with their
respective Government system and;
c) to develop national legislation including fines for violators, which will give effect to the BWM
Convention once ratified, as well as secondary regulations and technical arrangements for its
enforcement.
The harmonized arrangements are based on the relevant components and requirements of the BWM
Convention. Until such a time as the Convention has entered into force, the arrangements should
remain an interim voluntary instrument. This does not prejudice the right of any Contracting Party to
determine special requirements in certain areas under their jurisdiction, in conformity with international
law.
a) to adopt as soon as possible harmonized voluntary arrangements for ballast water exchange
in the Mediterranean region (Annex II); and
b) to notify all interested parties of the adoption of harmonized voluntary arrangements for
ballast water exchange in the Mediterranean sea through notices to shipping and instructions
to surveyors.
Action 3 Establish a solid Compliance, Monitoring and Enforcement (CME) system in the
Mediterranean region
In association with the development and implementation of the harmonized regional ballast water
management regime, a generic compliance, monitoring and enforcement system (CME) needs to be
developed to ensure compliance with the measures proposed within the regime. The CME system
should incorporate the following:
1. requirement for ships to collect and record information about their BWM practices (i.e. uptake,
management en route and discharge);
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 182
2. means for ships to transmit this information to the Port States’ BWM regulatory authority, and
to subsequently receive directions from them;
3. provision for examination/auditing of the ships’ official log books or other official records to
ascertain compliance with the BWM requirements of the Port State;
4. ability by the appropriate authority to obtain ballast water and sediment samples and carry out
any necessary testing;
5. legal provision for enforcement measures to be applied for non-compliance with the required
BWM requirements, and provisions for applying sanctions to violations; and
6. effective communication arrangements on a regional level to ensure proper tracking of
violations and exchange of experience during the application of the CME system on a national
level.
The proposed CME system for the region is attached as Annex III.
a) to adapt their existing Port State Control & CME systems to integrate the harmonized BWM
CME procedures; and
Action 4. Establish a survey, biological monitoring and risk assessment system for
Mediterranean ports
The development of a uniform regional biological monitoring system for Mediterranean ports is crucial
to understanding the nature of what is being managed, and supporting the methods through which the
management is implemented. The process of developing this system should be composed of the
following elements:
In some areas of the Mediterranean region, countries may identify sub-regional mechanisms for
collaboration on surveys, monitoring and risk assessment. For example, in the Joint Commission for
the protection of the Adriatic Sea waters and coastal areas, Croatia, Italy, Slovenia and Montenegro
have formed the Ballast Water Management Sub-Commission (BWMSC) which focus on the Adriatic
Sea area, and through which information on port surveys and IAS management is being shared.
a) to develop a regionally standardised biological sampling and monitoring protocol for use of
Contracting Parties in building the necessary biological and environmental databases to
support the IAS management objectives;
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 183
c) to seek institutional support at the national level to conduct port biological surveys and plans
for monitoring, as part of their national strategy for ballast water and IAS management;
d) to adapt and use the regional CHM for sharing of data related to port surveys and ongoing
biological monitoring; and
e) that a regional-level risk assessment should be produced based on the information made
available through biological surveys, as well as the shipping movement and ballast water
discharge databases.
Action 5. Enhance expertise; facilitate knowledge transfer and capacity building in the
Mediterranean region
Given the absence of national legislation and technical initiatives related to ballast water management
in several Mediterranean States, an effective Capacity Building programme should be established to
assist in carrying out activities which will assist in implementing the Strategy and Action Plan.
Capacity building activities should cover the following:
identification of National Lead Agencies and relevant stakeholders for ballast water issues
and formation of cross-sector / inter-ministerial working groups and committees;
communication and awareness raising activities;
port biota baseline surveys, monitoring and ballast water risk assessment;
research and development projects;
drafting of national ballast water legislation and regulations;
compliance monitoring and enforcement;
developing national ballast water management strategies and action plans; and
developing self-financing mechanisms.
Training activities should be organised both at regional and sub-regional level taking into
consideration similarities such as the geographical areas concerned (i.e. Eastern and Western
Mediterranean countries), the language, the status of ratification etc.). In addition, these training
activities should be carried out using the “Train the Trainer approach”, where appropriate, and used
by countries to replicate these training activities at national level.
b) to seek and secure support, individually or through REMPEC, from the IMO Technical
Cooperation Division (TCD), or other international organizations for national, sub-regional or
regional training courses and other capacity-building actions in support of activities of the
Action Plan;
c) to disseminate protocols and tools for standardization of technical approaches that could be
used to conduct regional and national activities;
d) that countries with specific expertise on ballast water management related activities help
organise national, sub-regional or regional training sessions; and
e) to replicate such training on a national level through the establishment of a national training
programme on ballast water management activities.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 184
Action 6. Enhance public awareness on ships’ ballast water and invasive alien species
issues
With a view to alert general and targeted public to the risks associated with introducing non-
indigenous marine species in the marine environment, and in this way add to the efforts towards
preventing and controlling the introduction of IAS into the Mediterranean Sea, coastal States and the
maritime industry should involve themselves in endeavors to raise knowledge and awareness on the
subject. General or specific awareness materials, according to the type of public targeted, are to be
used when they exist, or be developed, preferably in the local language of their respective countries.
5
Awareness materials already prepared by IMO-Globallast are available for download from its website
including brochures, posters and other educational documents and tools. Where possible,
collaborative partnerships will be forged between countries, and with NGO’s and other public interest
groups to aid in organising targeted public awareness campaigns.
a) to use IMO Globallast Public awareness materials and translate these to local languages for
dissemination at national level;
b) to carry out national seminars and workshops to raise awareness among the various
stakeholders involved; and
c) to develop local case studies that may be used effectively for awareness and leveraging
support within the Mediterranean region and its sub-regions.
To facilitate information exchange related to ballast water management issues among the Contracting
Parties, an information exchange network is considered necessary in the Mediterranean region. This
network will facilitate communications with and between countries, as well as function as a clearing
house mechanism (CHM) for data and ballast water management related information within the region.
a) to establish a web based Regional Information System based on the structure outlined in
Annex IV;
b) to explore possible options and functionalities of the system and decide upon the body
responsible for coordinating the development of the web-based Regional Information System;
d) to explore possible options and decide upon the body responsible for hosting and maintaining
the web-based Regional Information System.
Action 8. Incorporate the Action Plan evaluation within the Barcelona Convention
reporting system and procedure
The Action Plan is subject to periodic review to accommodate any developments on ballast water
management at the regional or global level and adjusted / updated accordingly. The implementation of
the Action Plan should be carried out under the coordination of REMPEC as a continuation of the
present efforts of the Centre devoted to enhance expertise in the region on ballast water management
issues. In addition, actions taken on a national level should be evaluated periodically under the
Barcelona Convention to determine their effectiveness.
5
http://globallast.imo.org/index.asp?page=AwarenessMaterials.htm&menu=true
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 185
a) to mandate REMPEC to coordinate and assist with the implementation of the Action Plan in
the region, in collaboration with the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas
(RAC/SPA) where relevant;
b) that REMPEC will inform its meetings of Focal Points, which take place every two years, on
the status of implementation of the Action Plan, for subsequent transmission to the Ordinary
Meetings of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention; and
c) to provide REMPEC with the relevant information on national-based activities with the
purpose of reviewing and evaluating the ongoing relevance and overall effectiveness of
activities carried out under the Action Plan.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 186
Annex 1
Year
Action Points Activities
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year
Action Points Activities
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year
Action Points Activities
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year
Action Points Activities
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Annex 2
Introduction
The harmonised voluntary interim regime is being submitted under paragraph 3 of Article 13 of the
International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
(Ballast Water Management Convention) whereby Parties with common interest to protect the
environment, human health, property and resources, particularly those bordering enclosed or semi-
enclosed seas, shall endeavour to enhance regional cooperation, including through the conclusion of
regional agreements consistent with the Convention. The proposed arrangements take into account
other adopted regional policies on ship’s ballast water exchange.
The regime forms also part of a regional strategy on ships’ ballast water management, developed
6
within the Mediterranean Action Plan , with the technical support of the GloBallast Partnerships
7
Project . It is based on the requirements of the Ballast Water Management Convention and is being
proposed as an interim regime. The regime is voluntary; therefore, ships entering the Mediterranean
Sea area are encouraged to apply these guidelines on a voluntary basis as from [XXXXXXXX].
This regime will no longer apply when a ship meets the ballast water performance standard contained
in regulation D-2 of the Convention, or when the Convention comes into force and a ship has to apply
the D-2 standard in accordance with the application dates set out in regulation B-3 of the Convention.
Definitions
Convention means the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast
Water and Sediments; and is hereunder referred to as “Ballast Water Management Convention”;
Mediterranean Sea area means the Mediterranean Sea proper including the Gulfs and seas
therein with the boundary between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea constituted by the 41° N
parallel and bounded to the west by the Straits of Gibraltar at the meridian of 005°36’ W;
Black Sea area means the Black Sea proper with the boundary between the Mediterranean and
the Black Sea constituted by the parallel 41°;
Red Sea area means the red sea proper including the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba bounded at the
south by the rhumb line between Ras si Ane (12°28’.5 N, 043°19’.6 E) and Husn Murad (12°40’.4
N, 043°30’.2 E).
1. Ships entering the waters of Mediterranean Sea area from the Atlantic Ocean (Straits of
Gibraltar), or from the Indian Ocean through the Red Sea (Suez Canal) or leaving the waters of the
Mediterranean Sea area to the Atlantic Ocean (Strait of Gibraltar) or to the Indian Ocean through the
Red Sea (Suez Canal), should:
(a) undertake ballast water exchange before entering the Mediterranean Sea area, or after
leaving the Mediterranean Sea area, as applicable, according to the standard set out in
the D-1 Standard of the Ballast Water Management Convention, and at least 200
8
nautical miles from the nearest land and in waters at least 200 meters in depth ;
6
The Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal
Region of the Mediterranean (Barcelona Convention) are the following: Albania, Algeria, Bosnia &
Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, The European Community, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Lebanon,
Libya, Malta, Morocco, Montenegro, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey.
7
GEF / UNDP / IMO project “Building partnerships to assist developing countries to reduce the transfer of
harmful aquatic organisms in ship's ballast water (Globallast Partnerships)”.
8
These geographical parameters are those set by Regulation B-4.1.1 of the Ballast Water Management
Convention.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 191
(b) in situations where this is not possible, either due to deviating the ship from its intended
voyage or delaying the ship, or for safety reasons, such exchange should be undertaken
before entering the Mediterranean Sea area, or after leaving the Mediterranean Sea
area, as applicable, according to the standard set out in the D-1 Standard of the Ballast
Water Management Convention, as far from the nearest land as possible, and in all
cases in waters at least 50 nautical miles from the nearest land and in waters of at least
9
200 meters depth .
(a) undertake ballast water exchange as far from the nearest land as possible, and in all
cases in waters at least 50 nautical miles from the nearest land and in waters of at least
200 meters depth. The areas, one of which being unfit for ballast water exchange due its
size, where such requirements are met in the Mediterranean Sea area, appear in the
map provided in Appendix;
(b) in situation where this is not possible either due to deviating the ship from its intended
voyage or delaying the ship, or for safety reasons, exchange of ballast water should be
10
undertaken in areas designated by the port State for that purpose ;
(c) such areas shall be assessed in accordance with the Guidelines on designation of
ballast water areas for ballast water exchange developed by the International Maritime
11
Organization , and in consultation with adjacent States and all interested States.
3. Sediments collected during the cleaning or repairing operations of ballast tanks should be
delivered in sediment reception facilities in ports and terminals, according to Article 5 of the Ballast
Water Management Convention, or be discharged beyond 200 nautical miles from the nearest land of
the coastline when the ship is sailing in the Mediterranean Sea area.
4. Exemptions can be granted to a ship on a voyage between specified ports or locations within
the Mediterranean Sea area, or to a ship operating exclusively between specified ports or locations
within the Mediterranean Sea area. These exemptions are to be granted according to Regulation A-4
1 of the Ballast Water Management Convention and based on the Guidelines for risk assessment
12
under regulation A-4 of the BWM Convention developed by the International Maritime Organization .
5. As per Regulation B-4 of the Ballast Water Management Convention, if the safety or stability
of the ship is threatened by a ballast water exchange operation, this operation should not be
undertaken. The reasons should be entered in the ballast water record book and a Report should be
submitted to the maritime authorities of the Port of destination.
6. Each vessel calling at a port within the Mediterranean Sea area is required to have on board a
Ballast Water Management Plan complying with requirements of the Guidelines for Ballast Water
Management and Development of Ballast water Management Plans developed by the International
13
Maritime Organization and to keep a record of all ballast water operations carried out.
9
These geographical parameters are those set by Regulation B-4.1.2 of the Ballast Water Management
Convention.
10
Regulation B-4.2 of the Ballast Water Management Convention.
11
Guidelines on Designation of Ballast Water Areas for Ballast Water Exchange (G14), adopted on 13 October
2006. Resolution MEPC.151(55).
12
Guidelines for Risk Assessment under Regulation A-4 of the BWM Convention (G7), adopted on 13 July 2007.
Resolution MEPC.162(56).
13
Guidelines for Ballast Water Management and Development of Ballast Water Management Plans (G4),
adopted on 22 July 2005. Resolution MEPC.127(53).
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 192
Appendix
Annex 3
Introduction
1. The invasion of alien species into new marine environments through ships’ ballast water and
sediments consist one of the greatest threats for the coastal and sea ecosystems. It is estimated that
3-5 billion tonnes of ballast water are carried annually by ships worldwide. While ballast water is of
high importance to the operation of a ship, it is, at the same time, a great environmental threat due to
the fact that over 7000 kinds of different microbes, plants and animals are being transferred worldwide
every year. The introduction of the above-mentioned organisms into a new marine ecosystem may
disturb its balance and affect the economic activities mainly, in the sectors of fishery and tourism, and
it may cause illnesses or even death to human populations.
2. It is a matter of high priority that a State develops firstly compliance monitoring and
14
enforcement measures (CME) in line with port State control guidelines developed by IMO , and
secondly includes research and constant monitoring measures, with view to developing sufficient
knowledge concerning the introduction of new organisms in terms of types, ports of origin and
possible effect on the local marine environment, which will aid the risk assessment process and
refine any CME requirements This information is especially important when interim measures are
being considered in order to mitigate the risk of new invasions.
4. A CME is the essential component of the overall Ballast Water Management regime or
National Strategic Framework designed to assess whether or not a ship has met the IMO
Convention’s and ports state’s BWM requirements, and where necessary, enforce these
requirements. There are various mechanisms which a competent authority can use to satisfy itself
that the rules and requirements are being met. These may involve sampling or testing, auditing of
records, observation or any other action or a combination of these actions and may vary from one
country or region to another. The CME will also change in time when the BWM Convention is ratified.
1. assess the ship’s compliance with the requirements of Ballast Water Management
Convention; and
2. gather data from the ship (such as the port of origin of ballast water, ballast water treatment
regime, volume of untreated water to be discharged, where and when the discharge is likely
to take place, amongst others) so that the port State, in the interim period prior to the BWM
Convention coming into, force can:
identify the risk of harmful aquatic organisms being introduced into an area through the ballast
water tanks of a ship ;
undertake risk assessments for the interim management of the risks posed by ballast water as
a vector for the movement of non-indigenous species; and,
Identify phytoplankton toxic organisms or other organisms that could be dangerous to public
health (e.g. fish-shell toxins) and potentially be imported into the region through ballast water,
and analysis of their potential effects (ecological and socio-economic).
6. The collection of this data after the BWC comes into force will also contribute to the formation
and development of exemptions and additional measures.
14
These guidelines are expected to be finalized by IMO during 2012.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 194
7. In addition, in order to undertake risk assessments and decide upon management measures,
a CME should be backed up with research on:
the distribution of harmful aquatic organisms (native, non native cryptogenic) in a port or a sea
area.
gathering data on species in the port of origin of ballast water being discharged in their ports.
8. The competent Port State Authorities may sample or require samples of ballast water and
sediments as part of port State Control enforcement of the BWM Convention, once the Convention
has entered into force. It should be noted that guidance on port State control for the BWM Convention
is being developed at the present time at the IMO. Port State control is likely to take the form of an
initial check of the documentation, the certification of the equipment and the state of the equipment.
This will only be backed up with indicative analysis or full sampling if the port State control Officer
suspects that there is a problem and cannot find clear grounds in the initial inspection that the ship
does not comply with the BWM Convention. Additionally, the port State may wish to target the ship
due to previous issues or reports from third countries. Work is being completed at IMO on when and
how indicative analysis/full scale testing should be undertaken.
9. Additionally competent National Authorities may require or ask vessels to provide information
on exchange or samples in order to collect data for research undertaken to mitigate risk. This can be
done on a ballast water reporting form which can be used to check if the ship has applied any interim
management requirements set by the port State. However, unless the collection of this information is
enshrined in local or national regulations, this submission of information or access to the ship to take
samples cannot be made mandatory. It should be noted that there is no requirement to report within
the IMO Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention.
ii. Sample Analysis of Ballast water to check that the D-1 Standard has
been met
10. Relative simple and quick salinity tests or other indicators of exchange (e.g. Coloured
Dissolved Organic Matter), may be able to verify if exchange has been performed (D1-standards) and
the ballast water was sourced from the location reported by the ship, or not.
11. However, this is only an indicator and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for
enforcement action, as ballast water exchange in specific sea areas has limitations with respect to the
safety and stability of the ship and the time needed to exchange water to meet the requirements of
the BWM Convention’s D-1 Standard (ships may not be able to complete exchange during very short
voyages). In such cases the ship should not be penalised for not exchanging their ballast water to the
BWM Convention’s standards.
iii. Sample Analysis of Ballast water to check that the D-2 Standard has
been met
12. In case that the Port State authority wants to check if the vessel is in compliance with the D-2
standard of the BWM Convention, then detailed sampling and testing for compliance with the D-2
Standard should be performed. Guidelines on sampling were developed under the aegis of IMO,
namely the “Guidelines for Ballast Water Sampling (G2)”, and further guidance is being developed by
the same organisation at the present time on indicative analysis (methods of analysing ballast water
quickly), which would speed up the sampling and analysis process.
13. If port State Control identifies that sampling and analysis of ballast water and sediments
samples is needed, specialist experts such as marine scientists and technicians, who have the
appropriate training needed to work onboard ships, should undertake this. Therefore, arrangements
with an accredited technical institute/ university or with an accredited laboratory to carry out the
analysis may be required. Moreover, the most critical aspect of such analysis is the number of
organisms in the discharge and the organisms’ viability, however, it is important to highlight that this
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 195
sampling and analysis of organisms in the ballast water could be difficult to accomplish without
delaying a ship especially in remote ports.
14. During the sampling, analysis of the following suggested parameters should be taken into
account:
15. The sampling and analysis of ships’ ballast water should follow standardized official methods,
some of which are still in development. This is important to assure the quality of the results globally
and will provide support to any enforcement action.
iv. Sediments and ships ballast water tanks being cleaned or repaired
16. According to Article 5 of the Convention, Parties should designate those ports and terminals
where cleaning or repair of Ballast tanks occurs, so that adequate facilities will be provided with the
entry into force internationally of the BWM Convention for the reception of sediments from ships
calling at those ports of terminals, taking into account the respective guidelines being developed by
the IMO. Countries in the region are invited to provide information on the availability of port reception
facilities for sediment, so cleaning or repair of ballast tanks can occur in Mediterranean Ports.
v. Other Research
17. In order to help risk assessments for the development of interim measures, additional
measures or exemptions, information should be collected on the biology and physicochemical
properties of water and sediments in ports (port of departure and port of arrival). In case that this isn’t
feasible in an area, any available published information should be reviewed. Furthermore, this
monitoring should be linked with an alert system so that ships taking up ballast water in an area of
concern can be subjected to appropriate emergency ballast water management methods, depending
on the nature of the risk that has been identified.
18. Any observation of new invasive alien species should be shared with other port States within
the region and added to relevant global databases on the invasion of alien species. This will also help
the international shipping industry and Port Authorities to be informed on any increase of invasive
alien species in certain areas and to enable the authorities in the area to notify ships with additional
information on pertinent ballast water management.
19. Enforcement measures should be applied in case it is established that a ship is non-
compliant, i.e. the ship is in violation of the BWM requirements of the BWM Convention and/or any
other requirements of the port State, such as ballast water emergency measures, ballast water
exchange zones or additional measures (given that such requirements have been communicated to
the ship before arrival by the Port State).
20. In the event that samples are found not to meet the BWM Convention’s D1 or D2 standards
during port State control, either through “clear grounds” identified in port State control, or through
indicative analysis or full scale/indicative sampling, the ship may be required to stop the discharge of
Ballast Water in a port. If this is the case then the ship would have to fix the problem before continuing
to discharge ballast water. Additionally, Port State authorities should avoid undue delays to ships
when taking any samples. Actions taken towards ships violating the BWM Convention should be in
the form of penalties and sanctions which must be backed up by national law and should be
proportional to the level of violation.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 196
22. Each situation of non-compliance should be treated on its merits with all factors being taken
into account before any enforcement action is taken. Penalties and sanctions could be applied with
different levels ranging from none in cases of situations outside the control of the ship, to very high in
cases of deliberate non compliance such as deliberate discharge of untreated / un-exchanged ballast
water with full knowledge of the Port state BWM requirements.
23. It is recommended that the penalties and sanctions regime set up for the BWM Convention is
aligned with any existing penalties and sanctions applied to shipping for other MARPOL related
violations.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 197
Annex 4
An appropriate mechanism for exchanging information is a web based system that covers all kind of
information which will be collected by the contribution of Contracting Parties to the Barcelona
Convention (hereafter referred as the “Parties”). The data input to the system will be elaborated by
three streams:
The scientific institutes of the Parties will produce relevant information. This information will be
coordinated and evaluated by the governmental authorities of the Parties. The Regional Activity
Centre is a gatherer body which also makes a gap analysis and makes coordination in order to
produce incomplete information.
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
The system will be used via internet. Each Party could enter the system by using one username and
password.
It will contain a home page from which one can access to the information module pages. Ten
information modules were defined.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 198
HOME PAGE WHERE THE LINKS OF THE GENERAL INFORMATION MODULES ARE LOCATED
This page provides icons in order to reach the information modules. The GISIS system of the IMO
was designated as an example for this system. One can reach each module by clicking on the
relative icon. Moreover, some announcements and news about the activities on ballast water
management could be placed on the centre of the page.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 200
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Study in the Ports of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention:
“Risk assessment Study of the Ports of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention” includes
a database for the risk assessment results. The ports can be chosen with the action bar. After
choosing the port the hereunder results will be showing.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 201
The results of risk assessment studies done by countries from other Regions and Regional or
intergovernmental Regional Organizations:
Also, the risk assessment studies done by countries from other Regions and Regional or
intergovernmental Regional Organizations could be found in a different page.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 202
The target invasive alien species can be found with respect to the biological region.
One of the most important inputs into the ballast water management system is the information which
could be obtained from the ballast reporting forms. The origin and volume of ballast water discharged
to the Ports of Parties can be easily provided from the reporting forms. The data provided from the
forms is a very important input for ballast water risk assessment studies. A web based system should
be designed in order to collect the ballast water reporting forms. The ships or the agents of the ships
or the harbour masters of the ports of Parties could record the data to the system.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 203
After choosing the port from the action bar, all the ships calling that port will be shown. It can be
reached to the original ballast water reporting form by clicking the yellow BWRF icon. Entries related
to flag on BWRF shall use only official names of States as recognized by the United Nations chosen
only from action bars. The user chooses the arrival and departure port only from action bars. Parties
will confirm the names of their ports.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 204
This module consists of a data base of the invasive alien species spread globally. It contains every
kind of information about the invasive alien species.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 205
Again an action bar is used to choose the species from name. It will also have a searching device
from habitat. After choosing the species, the page of the species will be opened that contains picture
and information about the species.
In this module all of the scientists who are working on invasive alien species are going to be put in
together. Parties are only allowed to include details of scientists/universities resident/situated in their
territory.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 206
All the IMO publications and the national legal instruments of the Parties will be located here in pdf
format.
In this module all the contact details of the national authorities of the Parties will be collected.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 207
An analysis instrument will be produced in order to determine the exchange limitations of the routes.
The user only chooses the arrival and departure port from action bars. Parties will confirm the names
of their ports. The instrument calculates the estimated arrival time and the possibility of the exchange.
All the media instruments produced by the Parties could be placed on this module.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 208
In this module, all the documents concerning the port baseline surveys of Parties could be collected.
In this module all the documents concerning the ballast water treatment activities could be collected.
ANNEX II
THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA AND THE NORTH-EAST ATLANTIC AND/OR THE BALTIC SEA”
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 211
“General Guidance on the Voluntary Interim Application of the D1 Ballast Water Exchange
Standard by vessels operating between the Mediterranean Sea and the North-East Atlantic
and/or the Baltic Sea”
1. In anticipation of the coming into force of the International Maritime Organization’s International
Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (the BWM
Convention), vessels operating between the marine areas as defined further in point 3, would
be expected to apply on a voluntary basis, as from [XXXXXXXX], the following guidelines to
reduce the risk of non-indigenous species invasion through ballast water. The guidelines are
addressed to the vessels covered by Article 3 of the BWM, taking into account the exceptions in
Regulation A-3 of that Convention. This Guidance does not replace the requirements of the
BWM Convention, but provide the part of interim Ballast Water Regional Management
Strategies for the Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the North-East Atlantic being
developed under Article 13 (3) of the BWM Convention by the contracting parties to either the
OSPAR Convention, the Helsinki Convention or the Barcelona Convention*. This Guidance will
no longer apply when a ship is in a position to apply the D-2 Standard of this Convention, or the
Ballast Water Management Convention comes into force and a ship has to apply the D-2
Standard.
2. If the safety of the vessel is in any way jeopardised by a ballast water exchange, it should not
take place. Additionally these guidelines do not apply to the uptake or discharge of ballast water
and sediments for ensuring the safety of the vessel in emergency situations or saving life at sea
in the waters of the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea and the North East Atlantic.
3. Definitions:
North-East Atlantic:
o those parts of the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans and their dependent seas which lie
north of 36° north latitude and between 42° west longitude and 51° east longitude
(but excluding the Baltic Sea and the Belts lying to the south and east of lines
drawn from Hasenore Head to Gniben Point, from Korshage to Spodsbjerg and
from Gilbjerg Head to Kullen, and the Mediterranean Sea and its dependent seas
as far as the point of intersection of the parallel of 36° north latitude and the
meridian of 5° 36' west longitude);
o that part of the Atlantic Ocean north of 59° north latitude and between 44° west
longitude and 42° west longitude.
The Baltic Sea:
o the Baltic Sea and the entrance to the Baltic Sea bounded by the parallel of the
Skaw in the Skagerrak at 57 44.43'N; and,
The Mediterranean Sea:
o the maritime waters of the Mediterranean Sea proper, including its gulfs and seas,
bounded to the west by the meridian passing through Cape Spartel lighthouse, at
the entrance of the Straits of Gibraltar, and to the east by the southern limits of the
Straits of the Dardanelles between the Mehmetcik and Kumkale lighthouses.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 212
5. Vessels leaving the Mediterranean Sea and proceeding to destinations in the North-East
Atlantic or the Baltic Sea should exchange all their ballast tanks to the standards set out by the
D-1 Standard of the Ballast Water Management Convention, at least 200 nautical miles from
the nearest land in water at least 200 metres deep, as soon as they enter the North-East
Atlantic. It should be noted that the best place to do this is in waters that meet these criteria to
the west of Portugal, Spain and France, as most of the waters of the English Channel and its
approaches, the North Sea and the Baltic Sea are less than 200m deep. A map identifying
1
these areas can be found in Figure 1 .
6. Vessels entering the Mediterranean Sea from the North-East Atlantic or the Baltic Sea and
proceeding to destinations in the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea or elsewhere should
exchange all their ballast tanks to the standards set out by the D-1 Standard of the Ballast
Water Management Convention, at least 200 nautical miles from the nearest land in water at
least 200 metres deep, before they leave the North-East Atlantic. A map identifying these areas
can be found in Figure 1.
7. If, for operational reasons, exchange is not possible at least 200 nautical miles from the nearest
land in water at least 200 metres depth, then such exchange should be undertaken as far from
the nearest land as possible outside the Mediterranean Sea, and in all cases in waters at least
50 nautical miles from the nearest land in waters of at least 200 metres depth. It should be
noted that nowhere in the Baltic Sea fulfils these criteria (Figure 2).
8. The release of sediments during the cleaning of ballast tanks should not take place within the
Baltic Sea, or within 200 nautical miles of the coastline of the North-East Atlantic, or within the
Mediterranean Sea.
* Albania, Algeria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, The
European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Latvia, Lebanon, Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, The Netherlands,
Norway, Poland, Portugal, The Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
1
For vessels leaving the Mediterranean or the North East Atlantic proceeding to destinations near Tarrifa Cape a
different regime for ballast water exchange could be considered.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 213
Figure 1: Map of North West Europe showing the 200 nautical miles and 50 nautical miles
contours and the 200m depth contour.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 214
Figure 2: Map of the Baltic Sea showing areas of more than 50 nautical miles
from the nearest land and areas of 200 meters depth.
UNEP(DEPI)/MED IG 20/8
Annex II
Page 215