Medicated Shampoos: Jerry Shapiro, MD, FRCPC Stuart Maddin, MD, FRCPC
Medicated Shampoos: Jerry Shapiro, MD, FRCPC Stuart Maddin, MD, FRCPC
Medicated Shampoos
JERRY SHAPIRO, MD, FRCPC
STUART MADDIN, MD, FRCPC
W
hen do we need to use a medicated sham- Medicated Shampoos to Combat Dandruff
poo? Not infrequently the scalp may be the
site of an associated psoriasis, dandruff The following active antifungal agents are contained in
alone, or, in its severe form, seborrheic dermatitis. Oc- antidandruff shampoos: ketoconazole, zinc pyrithione,
casionally the scalp may be the site of a folliculitis. selenium, sulfur, and, most recently, piroctone olamine
Some patients complain of an itchy scalp that is not (Table 2).
accompanied by any classic signs and may be relieved The first reference to an infective cause of seborrheic
by more frequent shampooing. dermatitis was in 1873!’ The following year, a pit-
The information that follows concerning medicated yrosporon-like organism was described by Malassez,
shampoos will provide rational therapeutic options that who thought it was responsible for pityriasis capitis.*
we hope will prove useful (Table 1). We also provide Unna and Sabouraud confirmed these observations,
detailed information dealing with prescription-only and the etiologic agent was identified as Pityrosporum
medicated shampoos. ovaIe.2,3 In 1984, Shuster announced that P. or&e fulfilled
We dermatologists should be increasingly aware that the terms of Koch’s postulate as the etiologic agent re-
our patients look to us to supply information that will sponsible for dandruff and seborrheic dermatitis, since
permit them to make more informed choices at the con- they are linked to an excessive presence of P. ovule-
sumer level. Often we have brushed off patients or trivi- affected skin.*j5 Support for this hypothesis was further
alized their questions, perhaps because we were unable strengthened when it was determined that ketocona-
to answer the queries or our knowledge was derived zole was an effective antifungal agent for reducing the
from the same source as theirs and we knew nothing levels of Pityrosporum. It is now generally accepted
more. Our undergraduate and even graduate training that P. ovule is active in the pathogenesis of seborrheic
programs devoted very little time to the subject of dermatitis. During treatment, P. ozde levels are reduced
shampoos. In addition, standard dermatology text- or eliminated. With recurrence, the yeast can again be
books include a paucity of information on this subject. demonstrated.
Thus, much of the readily available patient and doc-
tor information concerning shampoos is supplied by Ketoconazole
industry. When one considers that the worldwide Of the more than a dozen imidazoles currently avail-
shampoo market is estimated to have exceeded $6 bil- able, the antifungal properties demonstrated by ketoco-
lion in 1993, it is easy to understand why industry dedi- nazole have made it a leading contender for the treat-
cates so much time and so many resources to shampoo ment of seborrheic dermatitis. The use of ketoconazole
products. Our major interest concerns medicated sham- 2% in a shampoo formulation has been demonstrated to
poos, which have an annual market value exceeding $1 be both safe and efficacious. Van Cutsem et al showed
billion. Medicated shampoos include specialized for- that ketoconazole was more effective than zinc pyrithi-
mulations that incorporate one or several agents that one or selenium sulfide in terms of reducing pityrospo-
alleviate the underlying scalp problem. Crude coal tar- rum counts.(j Faergemann demonstrated that ketocona-
containing shampoos for psoriasis are popular with the zole was more effective in vitro against Pityrosporum
consumer but are under attack because of the terato- than other azole derivatives, such as fluconazole, econa-
genie potential associated with their use. Because most zole, clotrimazole, and miconazole.7 Ketoconazole 2%
of the available information comes from industry, how- shampoo has been extensively studied in more than
ever, many of us may not even be sure whether medi- 2000 patients with dandruff or seborrheic dermatitis
cated shampoos confer any therapeutic benefit. against placebo, and the shampoo has been consistently
more effective than placebo.s-‘O Many other studies
have also demonstrated the superiority of ketoconazole
From the University of British Columbia Hair Clinic Research, Treut- shampoo.“-‘6
merit, and Transplant Centre, Division of Dermatology, Department of This shampoo has been compared to topical steroids.
Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Address correspondence to Dr. Jerry Shapiro, Clinical Associate Profes-
Ortonne et al reported that 1 month after treatment,
sor, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of British reappearance of symptoms was more frequent in those
Columbia, 855 West 20th Avenue, Vancouver, BC VSZ lL7, Canada. treated with steroids, indicating that the ketoconazole
Category I, Il. G III we the designations nssigned by the Dermatology Review Panel, U.S.A
tributed to both its antimicrobial and its antioxidative been a companion of humans since prehistoric times.
action. The concentration used should be between 0.5% Head lice infestations remain a major public health con-
and 1.0%. Products containing this agent at these con- cern worldwide. Recent studies reveal that lice have
centrations are available in Europe. A comparative become firmly established in public schools. Through-
study of piroctone olamine and zinc pyrithione, both at out the United States and Canada, several million chil-
concentrations of 0.5%, showed that piroctone olamine dren are affected annually.
was more effective in the treatment of dandruff.
Lindane
Medicated Shampoos to Combat Lindane became available in the 1940sfor the treatment
Bacterial Infection of pediculosis capitis and scabies. Concern has recently
developed over the possible application of higher than
The following active agents are contained in so-called normal concentrations to the skin. Children are consid-
antibacterial shampoos: triclosan, chlorhexidine, ben-
ered to be particularly at risk, and percutaneous absorp-
zoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, poviodine-iodine, and sul-
tion may cause central nervous system toxicity.31 Now
fur.29
that other effective, safer treatment agents are available,
Although the surface of the scalp is teeming with
the use of lindane shampoo has decreased.
bacteria, they are usually members of the normal resi-
dent aerobic and anaerobic scalp flora. Bacteria present Malathion
on the hair shafts are easily removed by shampooing
Although classified as an organophosphorous pesti-
but are restored to their original level within 24 hours.
cide, malathion has an excellent safety profile.32 In
Bacteria on hairs are usually inconsequential, but under
some nations, such as the United Kingdom, malathion
certain circumstances bacteria such as Staphylococcusau-
has displaced lindane for the treatment of pediculosis
retls may involve the follicle, resulting in a staphylococ-
and [Link], patients complain of the un-
cal folliculitis. Antibacterial-containing shampoos are of
pleasant odor associated with malathion shampoo. Mal-
limited benefit in the management of scalp folliculitis.
athion is not currently available in the United States.
FDA since April 1986. 30 It is available as a mixture of Table 4. Shmnyoos for Psoriasis
25% cis- to 75% trans-isomers and formulated as 1% Denorex extra-strength Coal tar solution 12.5% &
permethrin in a standard commercial cream hair rinse menthol 1.5%
to which is added 20% isopropanol. The cis-isomer has DHS tar shampoo Coal tar 0.5%’
a higher potential for mammalian toxicity than the DHS tar gel Coal tar 0.5%
Duplex T Coal tar solution 10% & sodmm
trans-isomer, which is more rapidly metabolized. lauryl sulfate 15%
The 25:75 cis:trans ratio was preferred for human use locon Coal tar solution
because of the lower levels of &-isomer. Bowerman et Neutragena T gel Coal tar 2%’
al. compared lindane shampoo, permethrin 1% cream Neutragena T/solution Coal tar 2%, salacvlic acid 2’Ji
rinse, and placebo in 93 patients.33 At 14 days after Pentrax Coal tar 8.75% ’
Polytar Polytar 1%
treatment, 97% of patients treated with permethrin
Psorex Coal tar 1%
were free of lice compared to 6% of placebo-treated Targum shampoo Salicylic acid 5%
patients and 43% of the lindane-treated group. Perme- Tegrin Coal tar 50/c,allantoin 1.7%
thrin was 70% ovicidal compared to 45% for lindane. Tersa tar far distillate 3%
No adverse side effects were detected. Furthermore, Vanseb-T tar dandruff shampoo Sulfur 2%!, coal tar 5%, salicylic
acid, 1%
permethrin bonds to hair longer than lindane. Bower- Zetiu Whole colloidal tar 15;.,
man et al treated 1040 patients with either lindane or chloroxvlenof 0.5%
i -I__-- _...
permethrin: 98% of patients treated with permethrin
compared to 76% patients treated with lindane were
louse-free 2 weeks after treatment.33 Mild dermal reac- riod if the patients were using tar shampoo. There are,
tions such as pruritus and erythema occurred in 1.2% of however, no studies that compare the effectiveness of
permethrin-treated patients and 2.6% of lindane-treated one tar-containing shampoo agent to another.
patients. A recent report by Van Schooten et al questions
whether coal tar-containing shampoos should be sold
Pyrethrins without prescription and suggests that a limit be set for
Pyrethrum is an extract from chrysanthemums that pro- the level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons @‘AH)
vides a naturally occurring insecticide effective for the contained in coal tar-containing shampoos.“7 It has
treatment of scabies and pediculosis. Pyrethrin’s action been demonstrated that human exposure to PAH is as-
is enhanced when the agent is combined with piperonyl sociated with an increased risk of cancer.
butoxide. With the introduction of the synthetic pyre- Wood tars, oil of Cade, and pine tars were removed
throid permethrin, the use of the pyrethrin shampoo from shampoos on the recommendation of the FDA in
formulations has diminished.34 1990 because their efficacy had not been established.