0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views32 pages

Groovy for Quant Finance Experts

The document discusses using Groovy for quantitative finance applications. It outlines Groovy's main features and how it can be used for distributed computing, smart grids, and functional programming. Groovy allows for dynamic programming, domain-specific languages, and integration with Java libraries. The document also discusses challenges in quantitative finance like changing models, large amounts of data and products, and fast-changing trader needs. It argues Groovy can help through half-baked prototyping, learning from other languages, and dynamic programming.

Uploaded by

Jonathan Felch
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views32 pages

Groovy for Quant Finance Experts

The document discusses using Groovy for quantitative finance applications. It outlines Groovy's main features and how it can be used for distributed computing, smart grids, and functional programming. Groovy allows for dynamic programming, domain-specific languages, and integration with Java libraries. The document also discusses challenges in quantitative finance like changing models, large amounts of data and products, and fast-changing trader needs. It argues Groovy can help through half-baked prototyping, learning from other languages, and dynamic programming.

Uploaded by

Jonathan Felch
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Groovy On The Trading Desk:

Best Practices Developed From


Distributed Polyglot Programming

Jonathan Felch
[email protected]
JonathanFelch on Twiiter
Agenda
− Groovy Main Point
 Groovy Manifesto
 Major Language Features

− Computational Finance and Distributed Computing


 Finance Specific: Math / Data / Business / Languages
 Groovy Lessons: Use Cases

− Smart Grid and Dynamic Programming


 Data Grid: Moving Data Around
 Computational Grid: Moving Work and Code Around
 Operator Overloading and Dependency Graphs
 Groovy Lessons: Groovy Types, Dynamic Methods, GPars

− Functional Programming and The Problem of State


 Objects Versus “Smart Tuples”
 Closures, Operators, Currying and Chaining
 Groovy Lessons: Groovy Uses Or Groovy Is ?
 Groovy Type System: Friend or Foe?
Introduction

Jonathan Felch

− NASDAQ Software Architect 1997-99


− Lehman Brothers Global e-Commerce Architect 1999-2000
− Venture Capital Associate @ GS / BCG JV 2000-2001
− Quantitative Systems @ Syntax Capital 2005-2006
− VP Quantitative Prop Trading @ Credit Suisse 2006-2009
− Quant Trader @ E.H. Smith Jacobs High Frequency 2009+

[email protected]
JonathanFelch On Twitter and LinkedIn
Groovy Manifesto
 is an agile and dynamic language for the Java Virtual Machine
 builds upon the strengths of Java but has additional power features
inspired by languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk
 makes modern programming features available to Java developers
with almost-zero learning curve
 supports Domain-Specific Languages and other compact syntax so
your code becomes easy to read and maintain
 makes writing shell and build scripts easy with its powerful processing
primitives, OO abilities and an Ant DSL
 increases developer productivity by reducing scaffolding code when
developing web, GUI, database or console applications
 simplifies testing by supporting unit testing and mocking out-of-the-
box
 seamlessly integrates with all existing Java objects and libraries
 compiles straight to Java bytecode so you can use it anywhere you
can use Java
Groovy Use Cases

 Super Glue

 Half Baked Ideas

 Cookie Cutter Apps For Really Good Cookies

 Meta-Programming, Builders, And DSLs


Super Glue Example
Combine GUI Library (Swing), Network Library, and
XML Parser to make RSS Feed
def url ='http://www.groovyblogs.org/feed/rss'
def items = new XmlParser().parse(url).channel.item
def cols = 'pubDate title description'.tokenize()
groovy.swing.SwingBuilder.build {
frame(id:'f', title: 'Groovy RSS', visible:true) {
scrollPane {
table {
tableModel(list: items) {
cols.each { col →
closureColumn header: col,
read: { it[col].text() }
} } } } }
f.pack()
}
Groovy Performance:
Numeric Collections
Operator Overloading Creates Implicit
Dependency Graph That Optimizes Evaluation

Only Re-calculate Values That Change
 Overloading operators in numeric collections allow numeric
operations to only-recalculate variations in the dependency
graph
 JIT / Optimizers will load partial expressions into CPU
registered

− Closures as formulas
 Rather than using loops for executing an expression many
times, the collections can be mixed with numeric values
and constants in a single expression
Groovy Performance: Numeric Grid

// Monte Carlo Simulation For European Put Option in 10 Lines Or Less

def px = 100, r = 0.05, vol = 0.15, t = 1.0


def strikes = [80, 90, 100, 110, 120 ]
def w = RandomNumbers.getNormDist(1000,1000)
def S = px * Math.E ** ((r - ½ * vol * vol) * t + sqrt(t) * vol * w)
strikes.each { K →
def optionValue = Math.max(0, S – K)
def df = exp(-rate * time)
println “${strike} : ${df * optionValue as Number}”
}

// In Java or C You Would Have To Loop


Why Groovy ?
 Pith, Speedy Development Cycle
− Made for half baked ideas

 Learning Curve
− Familiar To Java Programmers, Java Syntax is (Mostly)
Groovy Syntax

 Dynamic Programming
− Meta-Programming, DSL Support

 Java / JEE / Enterprise


− Easy Stuff Is Actually Easy

 Community
What is Quant Finance ?

A quant designs and implements software and


mathematical models for the pricing of
derivatives, assessment of risk, or predicting
market movements

1 2
−  t t  
2
S t =S 0 e
What's The Problem: The Math
 Quant Finance Models are Wrong
− Even The Best Models Fail, Failure Is Expensive

 Assumption of Quantitative Finance Are Wrong


− Market Are Social Phenomena
− Not Random Walks, Not Natural Systems

 Quant Finance Models Change


− In Bad Times, They Change A Lot

 Coding Almost everything in C++ takes forever


 Coding Everything Else in VBA doesn't scale
What's The Problem: The Market
 Market Structures Drive Financial Data
− Different Calendars, Different Measures
− Equities and Government Auctions are Transparent
 Also options, some bonds, some preferred

− Exotic and Credit Markets are Illiquid, No


Transparency
 Some of products are not really 'securities'

 Identifiers are ridiculous, don't work, unclear


− ISIN, CUSIP, SEDOL, Tickers, ADRs, …
− Lifecycle of a Bond's ISIN (144a, Reg S, Registered)
What's The Problem: The Data

 Lots of Data, Lots of Math, Lots of Products


− Credit Market Subset
 1500 Companies / 2500 Curves / 10 Indices & Tranches
 10,000 Liquid Bonds / 2,000 Liquid Converts / 2,000 Loans
 1500 Liquid Equities / 169 point vol surface to start

− Derivatives and Quant strategies have many metrics


for each time series observation
 Securities can't be compared on price
 Relative values metrics are complex and there are many
What's The Problem: The Traders
 Great Trades Come From Half-Baked Ideas
− Fully Baked Ideas Have Already Been Priced In

 Traders Do Not Know What They Want


− Good traders ride the cusp of intuition and logic

 Whatever They Think They Want, They Wanted


It Yesterday

 Whatever They Want Today, They Will Never


Use Again
− Downside of the half baked idea
The Evils Of Financial Databases I
Date Price SMA_3 WRONG WAY:
3 102 101
4 103 102 SELECT DATE, PRICE, (TS1.PRICE+
5 104 103
TS2.PRICE+TS3.PRICE) / 3 AS SMA_3
6 105 104 FROM TIMESERIES TS1,
TIMESERIES TS2, TIMESERIES TS3
WHERE TS1.TICKER = TS2.TICKER |
Date Price Ticker AND TS2.TICKER = TS3.TICKER AND
TS2.DATE = (TS1.DATE-1) AND
1 100 ABC
TS3.DATE = (TS2.DATE-1) AND
TS1.TICKER = 'ABC'
2 101 ABC

3 102 ABC

4 103 ABC
Languages of Quant Finance
 Commonly used languages of Quant Finance
− C++ (The Dominant Industrial Strength Language)
− VBA
− Matlab, SAS, STATA, S+, and R
− C#
− Java (Most limited to Fixed Income and Web)

 Up and Coming / Research Languages of


Interest to Quant Finance
− Fortress, Scala, Groovy, Python, F#, and Erlang
Where Should We Go
 Polyglot Coding:
− Use C++ or Java Where You Need To
− Extend That Foundations With Python, Groovy, Lua,
Ruby, Scala, or some other dynamic language with
support for closures, meta-programming, and high-
level operations

 Post-SQL Data Management


− Combine Column Oriented and Row Oriented
Database Features In Cache
− Use Cache and Workspace and Integration Space
− Allow “Objects” to Evolve Dynamically
− Naturally Order Data Is Ordered In Cache
Groovy Performance:
Bad News
Overhead if NumericGrid Had Been Written in
Groovy Rather than Groovy-Aware Java

− Type System:
 Groovy Really Likes Java Collections, But Not Array
 Groovy Really Likes BigDecimal, But Not Primatives
 Groovy Really Likes Duck Typing

− Method Invocation

− Gparallelizer (Now Gpars)


 DSL For the JSR 166y ParallelArray Would Have Invoked
Many Copies of Groovy Collections Into Primative Maps
Databases versus Caching
 Traditional Model: Hibernate
− Data Model = Database plus Cache of POJOs
 All Objects of the name class share structure
 No (Persistent) Dynamic Properties on 1st class objects
 All first class objects (query-able) lived in the database

 Our Model: All POJOs → TupleMaps or Nodes


− Tuples of same class may 'grow' existing structure
− Tuples do not all have to come from data
 Questions about what does and does not belong in
database
 Query Language = Gpath / Xpath + Hibernate
 Includes dynamic properties and calculated values
Distributed Cache and
MetaProgramming I
 Terracotta for the shared memory and
synchronization
− Integration point for Hibernate and Hibernate
Cache
− Integration point for Groovy Data Adapters

 All First Class Objects are decomposed from


Java or Groovy objects to a 'Tuple'
− Not perfectly named, but a simple data structure
than implements Map and List
− Usable with XPATH
− Small Set of Primitives optimized for Terracotta
Distributed Cache and
Meta-Programming II
 Everything is a Property
− Data and methods
− Behavior follows a mathematical model
− Property listeners manage invalidation

 Missing Methods / Missing Properties


− Widely used calculations and method results stored
as property values so avoid redundant calculation
− Calculated values are never stored in the database
Distributed Cache and
Meta Programming III
 Tuple Class
− Much like a Groovy Class
− Joins objects like associations / relations in
Hibernate
− Defines raw types / names / converters
− Defines property finders / chained finders /
methods

 Missing Methods / Missing Properties


− Widely used calculations and method results stored
as property values so avoid redundant calculation
− Calculated values are never stored in the database
Distributed Cache and
Meta Programming IV
 Do We Even Want A Database ??
− Sometimes Accessing Data Remotely Works Just
As Well
− Sometimes Pulling Data from Flat Files On
Demand works Just As Well
− Sometimes Calculating from Values from old inputs
makes more sense than persisting it (normal forms)

 'Active' Cache As a Integration Space



Distributed Cache and
Meta Programming IV
 Did TupleMap and Tuple Class Simply Re-
Create The Object ?
− Functional Closures != Methods
− State Is Never Shared
− Curried Closures Can Move Large Tasks to
Distributed Work Queues or Thread Pools

 Data + Computational Grid = Scheduling Fun


− Move Work Requests To Where Data Lives
− Send Curried Closures To Computational Engines
Grails As A Integration Hub
 Controller requests arrive via JSON, XML, JMS
− R Language Client: JSON → Grails
− Excel Client: JSON → Grails Over HTTP
− Excel RTD: JSON → Grails over JMS
− SwingX Table (Real-Time) JSON → Grails via JMS
− SwingX Table JSON → Grails via HTTP

 Affiliated Business Units:


− XML Web Services from dot Not
− Matlab dot Net
Cache Logic: Reporting
def r = builder.reportWith(Bond.class, ”bond.cdsBasis < 0”) {
attr {
expression = 'bond.ticker'
name = 'Tkr'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.coupon'
name = 'Tkr'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.maturity'
name = 'Tkr'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.spot?.price?.last'
name = 'Px'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.spot?.yield?.last'
name = 'Px'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.spot?.zspread?.last'
name = 'Px'
}
attr {
expression = 'bond.spot?.cdsBasis?.last'
name = 'Px'
}
}
Grails to Excel I:
DASL(Ticker,Exp)
Ticker / JAVA ORCL GM IBM
Expression Equity Equity Equity Equity
it.spot.px 9.0 18.42 1.09 101.37

it.volSurface.find(delta : 50, expiry : 22 44 180 39


365).spot.iVol
it.cds.spot.spread 65.31 63 23730 60

it.refBond.spot.zspread 230 55 18700 57

it.cds.spot.basis -164.7 8 1030 3

it.fin.mrq.netDebt -300 10000 28846 21000

it.fin.mrq.totalDebt / N/A 5.5 N/A 6.3


it.fin.mrq.ebitda
Grails to Excel II:
DSLH(Ticker,Exp,Start,End)
Ticker / JAVA ORCL GM IBM
Expression Equity Equity Equity Equity
it.spot.px 9.0 18.42 1.09 101.37
15 May 2009 9.0 18.42 1.09 101.37
14 May 2009 9.0 18.46 1.15 101.05
13 May 2009 8.95 18.07 1.21 102.26
12 May 2009 9.05 18.38 1.15 103.94
11 May 2009 8.91 18.56 1.44 99.83
8 May 2009 8.71 18.32 1.61 101.49

 Expressions can be complex, traverse related


objects, join disparate data sources
Grails to Excel III:
DSLR(Report[Optional Para])

=DSLR('SUNMA') EqyPx CDS Bond Basis Debt Leverage


JAVA Equity 9.0 63 230 -164.7 -300 N/A

ORCL Equity 18.42 63 55 8 10000 5.5

IBM Equity 101.37 60 57 3 21000 6.3


Dasel:
A DSL for Financial Data
 Injectable Closures Into Tuples for “Column”
Definitions

 Simple Reporting / Excel Grammar

 GRAILS Rendered Everything Into Web Pages


or JSON / XML Services

 Component Library For Quantitative Analysis

 Massively Scalable Time Series Data Cache


The Revolution I
Technology And Finance

IBM
PDP-11 SPARC EMAIL WEB XML GRID
PC

 The Network Is The Computer


− We Can't Agree On Which End Of The Byte
Comes First (Big Endian / Little Endian)
− We Can't Agree On Character Set and Line
Delimiters (EBCIDEC, ASCII, Unicode)
− We Can't Agree How to Share Files
− We Can't Agree How To Share Code
Groovy Gotchas
 Pimping my library → Not Always Helping
− GPars: Copies are expensive, the syntax is great

 Language Gotchas

 Dynamic Method Invocation


− More Expensive than it should be

 'Groovy' Can Be Expensive: Abusing Each


− Anonymous Closures Versus loops (list.each {} )

You might also like