Indian Gold Investment Insights
Uploaded by
Shawn SriramIndian Gold Investment Insights
Uploaded by
Shawn Sriram- Introduction to Gold as an Investment
- Analysis of Gold Investment Returns
- Sovereign Gold Bonds Scheme 2015
- Risks and Opinions on Gold Investment
- Conclusion and Final Thoughts
Common questions
Powered by AIThe SGB scheme challenges the traditional view of gold as a heritage asset by shifting its role from a tangible, emotionally significant family heirloom to a financial instrument in the form of bonds. This transformation undercuts cultural attachments that associate gold with familial legacy and religious traditions . By transforming gold ownership into a digital format held in government records, it removes the tangible connections and usability gold has had as a source of emergency funds, which may affect its perceived value as a long-term family asset . Moreover, receiving cash instead of gold at maturity alters the intrinsic experience associated with passing down gold through generations .
If the Indian government's gold monetization efforts succeed, several potential economic outcomes could ensue. One likely consequence is a reduction in the national gold import bill, leading to an improved trade balance and preserving foreign exchange reserves . This can stabilize the domestic currency and foster more sustainable fiscal policies. Additionally, by reducing gold imports, internal consumption of gold substitutes like SGBs may rise, creating a more formalized banking sector influence over gold-related savings . A successful monetization strategy can also stimulate economic diversification as resources previously tied in gold could be reallocated to productive investments, accelerating economic development and growth .
Purchasing gold jewelry differs from buying Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs) in several key aspects. Jewelry involves physical gold, which incurs making charges, storage risks, and concerns over purity, whereas SGBs eliminate these issues by being dematerialized investments . Additionally, jewelry is often retained within families for cultural and religious reasons, rarely sold unless in financial distress, while SGBs are intended as investment vehicles with fixed maturity periods and periodic cash interest returns. SGBs are more illiquid compared to physical gold, as they can only be redeemed after five years, whereas jewelry can be sold or mortgaged more freely when required .
The Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGB) scheme aims to reduce India's gold import demand by providing an alternative to holding physical gold. Since SGBs are a substitute for physical gold and offer a fixed interest rate, they make it less appealing for investors to purchase physical gold. By investing in SGBs instead, the associated costs and risks of storing physical gold are eliminated, potentially reducing the overall import demand . Additionally, if successfully implemented, these schemes could lead to decreased imports, as they also align with the government's broader economic strategies to curb gold imports .
Indians traditionally hold onto gold for several reasons: it serves as a hedge against bad times, as it is highly liquid and can be mortgaged or sold in times of crisis; it is a vehicle for hoarding black money; and it is valued for its cultural significance, being used in religious offerings and as family heirlooms passed down through generations .
The illiquidity of Sovereign Gold Bonds (SGBs) poses significant issues for Indian investors who traditionally value gold for its liquidity. SGBs have a fixed tenure of 8 years, with early redemption allowed only after the 5th year, making them less accessible in times of immediate financial need compared to physical gold, which can be easily sold or mortgaged . This limitation conflicts with the cultural practice of using gold as a financial safety net and may deter investors who prioritize emergency liquidity. Furthermore, physical gold has emotional significance and is often passed down generations, while SGBs lack this heritage value .
Different financial entities promote gold-related investment products primarily due to vested commercial interests. The World Gold Council promotes gold as a good investment to maintain demand, while fund houses and stock exchanges benefit from transaction fees and asset management fees associated with Gold Funds and ETFs . The Reserve Bank and government promote the Sovereign Gold Bonds to reduce gold imports, impacting national economic stability positively. Financial advisors may push these products to earn commissions or because they have affiliations with sellers and brokers, indicating a lack of objective advising that serves the best interests of individual investors .
SGBs offer a fixed interest rate of 2.75% per annum, which is substantially lower than the approximate 8% interest rate on fixed deposits in India . The potential drawback of the SGB scheme, despite offering interest, is that the benefits are taxable under the Income-tax Act and are subject to capital gains tax, much like physical gold. In comparison, fixed deposits offer clearer, non-tax-deductible returns up to certain thresholds and are seen as more stable investments against volatile gold prices. Additionally, the redemption value of SGBs in cash rather than gold itself poses a risk if gold prices underperform over the 8-year tenure compared to fixed income solutions .
Widespread adoption of the SGB scheme could lead to a decrease in India's gold import demand, one of the world's largest, thereby reducing the global demand for gold. This shift could result in oversupply compared to demand, potentially keeping gold prices stagnant or causing them to fall internationally . If SGBs and other gold-saving schemes by the Indian government are successful, they may encourage similar initiatives in other countries, amplifying the global impact. Consequently, gold may shift from being a safe-haven asset to a commodity with more stable, but potentially lower, price movements over time .
Historically, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of gold from January 1990 to November 2015 was 4.3% . In contrast, the average inflation rate in India during this period was approximately 8% , meaning the investment in gold effectively resulted in a negative real return after accounting for inflation.
