Scribd
Upload
113 views1 page

Torts Liability and Vicarious Responsibility

The document discusses the liability of tortfeasors and the doctrine of vicarious liability. It provides examples of vicarious liability for various entities including: 1) Parents and guardians for the actions of their children. 2) Employers for the actions of their employees. 3) Owners of vehicles for damages caused by those vehicles. 4) Various government entities including states, provinces, cities and municipalities. 5) Teachers and heads of establishments for students or trainees under their supervision.

Uploaded by

Charlie Pein
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
113 views1 page

Torts Liability and Vicarious Responsibility

The document discusses the liability of tortfeasors and the doctrine of vicarious liability. It provides examples of vicarious liability for various entities including: 1) Parents and guardians for the actions of their children. 2) Employers for the actions of their employees. 3) Owners of vehicles for damages caused by those vehicles. 4) Various government entities including states, provinces, cities and municipalities. 5) Teachers and heads of establishments for students or trainees under their supervision.

Uploaded by

Charlie Pein
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

I.

Liability of tortfeasors

a) Metro Manila Transit Corp. vs. The CA & Nenita Custodia G.R. No. 104408 June 21,
1993
b) Macario Tumargo et. Al. vs. CA G.R. No. 85044 June 3, 1992

II. Doctrine of Vicarious Liability

1. Parents & Guardians


a) Tumargo et. Al. vs. CA G.R. No. 85044 June 3, 1992
b) Sps. Cresencio Libi vs. IAC et. al. G.R. No. 70890 Sept. 18, 1992
c) Exconde vs Capuno G.R. No. L-10134 June 29, 1957
d) Cangco vs. Manila Railroad Co. G.R. No. L-12191
e) Salen vs. Balce G.R. No. L-14414 April 27, 1960

2. Employers
a) Castilex Ind. Corp. vs. Vicente Vasquez & Cebu Doctors Hospital Inc. G.R. 132266
Dec. 21, 1999
b) Victory Liner Inc. vs Heirs of Andres Malecdan G.R. No. 154278 Dec. 27, 2002
c) St. Francis High School & Patricia Cadiz vs. CA G.R. No. 82465 Feb. 25, 1991
d) Baliwag Transit, Inc. vs. CA, Divina Vda. De Dionisio G.R. No. 116624 Sept. 20,
1996
e) Perla Compania De Seguros, Inc vs. Sps. Gaudencio Sarangaya III G.R. No. 147746
Oct. 25, 2005
f) Filamer Christian Institute vs. IAC G.R. No. 75112 Aug. 17, 1992
g) Sps. Fernando and Loures Viloria vs. Continental Airlines, Inc. G.R. No. 188288 Jan.
16, 2012
h) Equitable Leasing Corp. vs. Suyom et. al. G.R. No. 143360 Sept. 5, 2002
i) Rafael Reyes Trucking Corp. vs. People of the Philippines and Rosario P. Dy G.R. No.
129029 April 3, 2000

3. Owner of Vehicle
a) Chapman vs. Underwood G.R. No. 9010 Mar. 28, 1914
b) Duavit vs. CA et. al. G.R. No. 82318 May 18, 1989

4. State, Provinces, Cities & Municipalities


a) City of Manila vs. Teotico G.R. No. L-23052 Jan. 29, 1968
b) Torio vs. Fontanilla G.R. No. L-29993 Oct. 23, 1978

5. Teachers & Heads of Establishments of Arts & Trade


a) Amadora vs. CA et. Al. G.R. No. L-47745 Apr. 15, 1988
b) Palisco vs. Brillantes G.R. No. L-29025 Oct. 4, 1971
c) PSBA vs CA G.R. No. 84698 Feb. 4, 1992

6. Proprietor of Building or Structure


a) De Roy et. al. vs. CA G.R. No. L-80718 Jan. 29, 1988

You might also like