1

Introduction

In the automobile industry, modularization comprises of architectural modifications in production,

supplier systems and product, production, and supplier systems. The main aspect or the critical

goal of the auto manufacturers and suppliers is to make, design and develop a vehicle consisting

of modular sections which is able to deliver manufacturability and optimum efficiencies of scale.

It is important to ensure that the delivery of both components comes with wider possible variations

in automobiles. Such measures should be taken in order to ensure customer satisfactions on the

increasing range of vehicle delivery in the market. In general, there are around 650 auto

manufacturers who are working internationally to produce diverse vehicle types with a variety of

functions, shapes and sizes.

Problem Formulation

Modularization is a technique that helps to increase the efficiency of the production process in

automobiles. Modularization is used in many fields but still there are many research gaps where

the information is insufficient or very concentrated.

 2

Modularisation has focus from companies outside their traditional aviation and automotive

industries, hence, more and more firms are gaining greater use as an instrument of strategy and

product development. Therefore, this research study intends to explain the significance of

modularisation and how it can be implemented within the practices of firms. In accordance with

the literature review, this research study will learn new aspects in relation with the modularisation.

It will describe how Tesla Motors can implement such practices by the help of Lewis change

model. The real phenomena of modularisation will find out the initial steps and improve

competitiveness of the company (Tesla Motors Inc.). By combining practical and theory approach

to modularisation, the research study will draw the divergence and convergence between the

implementation of the real world of modularisation and the theoretical modularisation

implementation. This gives a valuable contribution to the auto manufacturer companies, as well as

to study new aspects in research examination.

Theoretical Motivation

The theoretical motivation for this research study is to combine the theory and practical

implementation of modularization in Tesla Motors Inc. which has not yet applied this strategy in

their automobiles.

Aim of the Research Study

This research is based on the analysis of modularization in the automobile industry. The

automobile company selected for this paper is Tesla Motors Inc. In the automobile industry,

modularization comprises of architectural modifications in production, supplier systems and

product, production, and supplier systems with concerned areas of automobile distribution. They

all have different purposes and aspects which will be emphasised in the paper
 3

Aims and Objectives of the research

This particular research study has following aims and objectives listed below:

To explore the opportunities of modularization in the automobile market.

To find out the current status of Tesla Motors in the automobile industry.

To identify the factors involved in merging modularization in Tesla Motors Inc.

Research Questions

The research questions which need to be explored in the study are as follows:

What are the chances of modularization to fit in Tesla Motors?

What is the current market share and market position of Tesla Motors?

Which factors are responsible to help in merger of Modularization into Tesla Motors?

How has the modularization works in Tesla motors and how they are using this

innovative technology in enhancing their business?

Theoretical Literature

The modularization concept has appealed attention in the automobile industry in recent years. The

purpose and meaning of modularization in this sector vary among firms and regions. There is no

uniform definition of modularization in the industry clearly (Mohan, Trngren, Izosimov et al.,

2016). However, it is a relatively common feature of modularization of various practices in the

automobile industry. It consists of bigger units in the subgroup and also includes these subset

suppliers outsourcing (MacDuffie, 2013).

As modularization is still considered a new field relatively, therefore, there are many

methodologies and documents to study upon. The main question which exists is the correct
 4

utilisation in the specific situation of a particular project to another venture. Modularization is

difficult to identify in a certain method or a process, since each architecture of the product is

different in a company (Milkovic, Ivkovic, and Konecki, 2016). This product specification also

vary firm to firm when modularizing is practiced. If a firm serves a market that is very rigid, there

may be many reasons to involve services of marketing like the firm was to serve a dynamic and

diverse market (Yamaguchi, 2016).

Research Methodology

Research methodology helps in setting a view for an effective research. This research study will

use random sampling technique. The research will be based on the descriptive research (Flick,

2015). This is a descriptive research which is relevant to an inquisitive study as it require some

analysis on the performance of different automobile companies where modularization is

implemented. There will be one type of data that will be analysed in the research study i.e the

secondary data (Mackey, and Gass, 2015). The secondary data will be collected from secondary

sources which includes Tesla official website, automobile websites, articles based on

modularization and researches in context with the role of modularization is automobile industry.

Chapter # 02 Search protocol

2.1 Introduction

Search protocol is an important aspect in the research study which helps in dictating a direction

for the research. In other words, it helps to dictate the research subject in a precise way so that the

acquired results help to convey a meaning. Search protocol greatly assists in finding the

appropriate data of the research in order to acquire a good amount of information on the current

subject in consideration. This research study is based upon the exploration on assessing the role of
 5

Modularisation in Tesla Motors Inc. The literature review gathered is identified by the help of the

research subject. The books, articles, newspapers, online forums and research papers based upon

the subject of modularisation in the automobile industry are extracted out in order to attain the

required literature.

The literature on modularisation is very limited as the subject is relatively new, therefore, there is

a lot of research gaps found in the concept of modularisation. Since, the concept of modularisation

is not much practiced in the automobile industry, therefore, Tesla Motors is the chosen company

in order to role of the modularisation process in the company. Tesla Motors will be analysed by

regarding the company to serve the role of Modulators rather than sticking upon the strategy of

Integrators. Hence, the search protocol will correspond to the research respondents, who will help

in contributing knowledge on how the process of modularisation can be installed and implemented

within the company.

The search protocol will cover the aspects of identification and analysis of clear and definite

literature review which is suitable for carrying the objectives of the research study.

2.2 General Information

Protocol Title:

Protocol Date:

Protocol Venue:

Name of the Researcher:

 6

2.3 Rationale of Research

The rationale behind this research study is to cover the research gaps on the research topic. The

strategy has not been implied in automobile industry because of the unavailability of skills and

expertise in implementation of modularisation process.

2.4 Title of Research Articles

The research articles are searched on account of the availability of information on the proposed

topic of the research. The names are acquired by internet, business articles and research journal

sources. The names of the research articles are as follows:

2.5 Information of Research Respondents

The names and information of the research respondents is kept confidential. This is due to the

exposure of information, they have provided in regard of the companys automobile processes.

The processes which are hidden are revealed in the research study in order to provide meaningful

knowledge to the research audience. Hence, the identity is kept hidden from the audience.

2.6 Study Goals and Objectives

The study goals is to acquire proper and suitable literature in order to acquire correct information.

This is done to ensure correct data findings for the research which is then concluded with

appropriate recommendations.

Chapter # 03 Literature review and synthesis

3.1 Introduction

The literature reviews comprises of methodological and theoretical contributions in the context of

the research study. The sources assessed in search of collecting the literature reviews are only from
 7

secondary sources where there is no new information to the experimental work. Literature review

is written in order to develop an understanding and explore researches and studies in context of

the research topic.

As the research topic revolves around the research upon the Role of Modularisation in Tesla

Motors Inc., therefore, chapter will be based on the literature review of Modularisation in general.

The literature review will further cover aspects like significance of modularisation, techniques

based on modularisation, research paradigms, and theories based on modularisation.

3.2 Importance of Modularisation

In literature, the term Modularisation is not a new terminology. Even the production industry

knows the importance and the critical significance of modularisation (Langlois, 2002). It has been

over 60 years that the modularisation has been practiced in the world of automobile industry.

Modularisation has been known widely in the automobile and aviation industry where the strategy

has created wonders in cost effectiveness and production utilisation tool. In order to locate the

theories or the case studies based on modularisation, it becomes a complete different task as it is

very difficult (Baldwin and Clark, 2000). Therefore, the process can be described vaguely in the

procedures and processes. There are few researchers who have provided an effective strategy or

work techniques that best describes the use of modularisation (Argyres and Bigelow, 2010;

Pandremenos, Paralikas, Salonitis et al, 2009).

By the help of these few researchers, formularisation and amalgamation of techniques are used in

the automobile processes in regard of the field of modularisation. The main reason is the process

that is accurately suitable for the modularisation process is hard to be determined or formulated

(Baldwin and Clark, 2006).

 8

Some of the researchers contend upon the statement that literature is found on the modularisation

evolution. But, the discussion upon the modularisation contradiction is limited and scarce (Larson,

Casey and Howard, 2005; Salerno and Dias, 1999). Even the field of modularisation has been

observed and assessed for a while, still there are some existing gaps in the researches and literatures

based on the approach of modularisation. Similarly, the identification of the team goals and

objectives are critical in obtaining a successful modularisation venture (Xue-Jie, 2005).

In one of the research conducted by Fourcade and Midler (2005), the modularisation in the

automobile industry is connected with the organisational perspective with the modularising act

and referred to the decoupling in the design of the final product that is to be inherited in the firm.

It was also briefly defined by the researcher that the roles embossed within the project of

modularisation refers to the technology engineers and architects (Fourcade and Midler, 2005).

However, the concerned team fails to specify an analysis which is thoroughly defined on the roles

connected with such project. This is because of the strategical focus in the research paper

(Fourcade and Midler, 2005).

When modularisation is implemented within a project, the situation defined for the required

product is very specific in nature and it is important to know that every project concerned with the

modularisation technique is different each time (Park, Lee, Bang et al, 2005). Therefore, the

structure and the roles of the modularisation project is very critical in order that it permits the

influence from all functions in an organisation (Salerno, 2001). The adaption and approach of

every function can be expressed to obtain the extent of modularisations synergy effects at

marginal costs in terms of resources (Langlois, 1999). In a case where a modularisation process is

run without the total dedication and involvement in each function, the back-log will develop before

the modularisation project is considered closed. This ultimately costs more resources for the
 9

organisation that originate the project. In other words, the project is known to be modular

management (Takeishi and Fujimoto, 2003).

3.3 Existence of Modularisation in Automobile Industry

In the automobile industry, modularisation is still considered as a process which is in error and

trial stage. The auto industry has started to address these issues where it shows the history of

several years. The purposes and contexts of modularisation differs among different regions and

firms (Fourcade and Midler, 2004). Therefore, it is yet quite uncertain and unpredictable in the

current environment in the context of the evolution and impact of modularisation (Fujimoto, 2014).

Hence, the arguments which is created holds no more significance except the speculation. Still, it

can be said that the modularisation strategy in the automobile industry is safe and the ingoing

procedures that concerns modularisation provide several interesting cases to assess the dynamics

of the adjoining engineering and architectural modifications (Hsuan, 1999; Lung, Salerno,

Zilbovicius et al, 1999; Ulrich, 1994).

The aspect that lie in the middle of the dynamics is the linkage among the inter-firm system,

architecture of the product and production system (Takeishi and Fujimoto, 2001). The

modification in the production system hierarchies and the inter-firm systems produces tensions in

their interactions with the architecture of the product. Thus, it encourages the redefining of the

architecture of the product. It was pointed out by Baldwin and Clark (2002) that the problems in

the modularisation comprises of the modularity in production, modularity in use, and modularity

in design. The main focus in the research was based on the aspect of modularity in design.

In contract to this research, another researcher Takeishi and Fujimoto (2001) contended that each

of the defined three aspects has their own ideal architecture and they are balanced well in regard
 10

of the relationships between them, which should be controlled in the modularisation process. This

tends to suggest that the three modularisation aspects ae inter related with each other and all of

them has an adjacent co-ordination which is very critical. The researchers also pointed that it is

significant that the co-ordination between organisational architecture and architecture of the

product is to be secured as well (Takeishi and Fujimoto; 2001). The organisational architecture is

inclusive of the inter-firm and intra firm organisation. The argument was also equipped with a

suggestion that the inter-firm system has a tendency to lead to modifications in the architecture of

the product. It is well recognised that the modularisation process in the architecture of product

sometimes alter the structure of the labour division in the automobile industry (Genba, Ogawa,

and Kodama, 2005). This is applicable on the vertical industry automobile structure towards the

horizontal industry automobile structure (Baldwin and Clark, 2003).

In other research paper, it was suggested that the relation among the inter-firm system and the

architecture of the product is two way which is responsible in former influencing the latter and the

latter lays an impact upon the former (Wang and Huang, 2010). It was argued upon the analytical

framework in context of the hierarchies in the system product called the product function and the

product structure which corresponds to those in the inter-firma system and production system

(Sako and Murray, 1999). In a complex system, the hierarchal structure is produces as a technique

to rationalise the labour division. Each of the production, inter-firm systems and product has their

own logic in the labour division. The inter-firm systems and the production system hierarchies

modifies in their own regard (Lung, 2004). The example can be taken from the development of

labours satisfaction, the utilisation of the salary gap among different firms, the re-allocation of

risks, and investment liability etc. (Yamaguchi, 2016). Such modifications in the inter-firm

systems and the production systems might demand modification in the architecture of the product.
 11

The design activities conditions is not only the factor for modification in the architecture of the

product (Fujimoto and Takeishi, 2001). For instance, there are European automobile

manufacturers which are engaged in the exploration of new architectures across the production

systems, product systems, and inter-firms systems. The main motive of these automakers is to

search for a higher lucrative and cost effective business model (Milkovic, Ivkovic, and Konecki,

2016).

3.4 Theories Based on Modularisation

There are two case studies which were presented by Mikkola and Skjtt-Larsen (2004) that

presented the idea of modularising at a concise and scientific mathematical pace. It describes the

view of expanding the theoretical modularisation. The researchers found many complications in

in the product portfolio of a huge company in any certain industry. Mikkola and Skjtt-Larsen said

that the product portfolio can be calculated by any meaning with an absolute certainty which will

be followed by the firms strategy of the product recommendation. However, with a mathematical

function to put the results in the right perspective could provide the validity and guidance tested

to deliver accordingly (Mikkola and Skjtt-Larsen, 2004).

It is not taken into account that Mikkola and Skjtt-Larsen's approach can "cope with modularity",

but a set a tool propositional to dialog with firms management to open or as an extension of the

validity of the approach reports the understanding of modularisation management ((Mikkola and

Skjtt-Larsen, 2004).

In modularisation, there is a derivative used which serves as mass customisation into which a

customer interaction product is customised, precisely for each customer. This tool is extremely
 12

influential to meet specific customer requirements, where big disparities in the product requires a

lot of customisation of the firm (McDermott, Mudambi, and Parente, 2013).

In another theory based on modularisation, a researcher named Prez, Gonzlez and Milans et al,

(2009) managed to explain the diverse roles in a project of configuration very thoroughly and

explored how these roles are significant enough in the modularisation. Therefore, Prez, Gonzlez

and Milans et al explained nine role that helped in focusing upon the development of a

configuration system which was way more than modularising. The researchers also pointed out

that there are many aspects of the configuration systems which considered transferable (Prez,

Gonzlez and Milans et al, 2009).

The researcher stresses upon how important a team approach is, by assigning the task of

configuring a system to meet as many needs as possible instead of focusing upon one approach

(MacDuffie, 2006). This concept is elaborated in the report where diverse approaches create effects

of synergy that allow a project to re-design the modular part or a defined system to meet the

requirements and focus on the key elements of various functional approaches. In the approach of

mass customisation, with a process of system configuration, where the processes of specifications

are highly important in terms of system design with the logical connectivity and constraints

(Vickery, Koufteros, Drge et al, 2015). This is much similar approach which is applied in the

process of modularisation, knowing the fact that the severity of the specification is most essential

in a configuration system.

The process of decoupling becomes easier by determination of the specifications and defining the

interface points and their relation (Nunes and Bennett, 2008). Hence, it enhances the basis for the

development of modular products to be improved. As the field of modularisation is new, there are

still many areas which can be linked with the modularisation process. This can be done in order to
 13

enhance the modularisation process in automobile industry (Furlan, Cabigiosu and Camuffo, 2014;

Ikeda and Nakagawa, 2001).

3.5 Strategies and Techniques used in Modularisation

The introduction of a modular strategy is complex. The costs will rise initially as the accountability

for investments is from car manufacturers to the car suppliers. The actual savings will only be

realised in the next generation of the vehicle (Furlan, Cabigiosu, and Camuffo, 2014). If one

consider a new policy of module or a relative strategy for taking into account then the firms should

consider the options to define the needs of the current and future vehicle venture, identify

commonalities between vehicles and define the clusters of module and their specifications, specify

a basic module along with variants and conduct cost analysis and finally to develop a fact sheet

and fact book and development of the hierarchy module (Gaillard, 2006).

In the practical auto industry, there are very few manufacturers known as OEM (Original

Equipment Manufacturers) which are using strict modularisation strategies (like Nissan and

Toyota). They have led to a considerable competitive advantage and jumping to sales growth from

one record of sales to the next (Fogliatto, Da Silveira, and Borenstein, 2012).

The approach requires knowledge in regard of the techniques and strategies of modularisation

which is used in the specified situation and the origination and configuration of the modularisation.

In current world, there are people who are busy in the exploration of the environmental friendly

manufacturing processes, thus, modularisation strategy acts very significantly in this scenario and

is considered an effective tool in the production strategy where it is acting cost saving and user

efficient (Yamaguchi, 2016).

 14

It is possible that the modularisation strategy cannot identify the actual challenges facing the

unnecessary product development strategy in wort case condition. The literature based on

modularisation strategy is unable to explain the diverse participation and its relative importance

which can break or make the conclusion of modularisation (Guerzoni, 2014). In such conditions,

it is recommended that, rather making thing rights, it is much better to do right things first. This

means that understanding the changes in the industry in business cases can lead to outcomes which

can be different. However, note the difference in participation in the modularisation project from

a certain industry to another, may end up as an important point (Luccarelli, Matt and Spena, 2015).

A modular strategy is defined as a process that takes advantage of the modular architecture of

products. Modular product is a product whose nature is complex and the individual elements are

made independently and yet work together as a unified whole (Hsuan, 1999). This type of product

was quickly adopted in the auto industry, in which the modules of the vehicles can be considered

like internal combustion engine, vehicle operating systems and car computers (Fujimoto, 2014).

By means of pursuing a modular approach, International Business Machines got the chance to

acquire the lead in manufacturing and designing the System 360 (Argyres and Bigelow, 2010).

However, the distribution of the revenues of a modular approach or strategy is motivated by the

specific characteristics of the industry, as the contrast among automobiles and computers portray

in the following diagram:

 15

Modularisation Areas Source (Fujimoto, 2014)

Modularity in Design

Modularity in design is an approach where the consumer is facilitated with maximization of ease

of use minimize the maintenance and ease the modular operations.

Modularity in Use

Modularity in use is an approach which sub-divides the production system to meet the product

variety.

Modularity in Production

Modularity in production is an approach which sub-divides the production system to meet the

product variety.

However, a widespread method seems to have been modularised. The MFD (Modular Function

Deployment) tool by Xue-Jie (2005) is frequently referred to and utilised as a stepwise process

upon the investigation as to which part of the architecture should be standardised and modularised.
 16

In terms of participation and implementation of the Modular Function Deployment, portrayals of

approach and roles are reduced to clarify that the employees have a thorough knowledge of the

product. In opinion, it is not considered as an open modularisation (Xue-Jie, 2005). If the

respondents of the Modular Function Deployment, are utilised as a companys modularisation

strategy basis, belonging to the same persuasion or department of how the product can perform.

The project of modularisation project might not include procurement approaches that may have

been able to reduce the standardisation costs. Similarly, it is not inclusive of the marketing which

had been able to assess the future trends of the customer, or production, which could be able to

utilise prevailing knowledge on production in the process of implementation (Xue-Jie, 2005).

3.5.1 Modular strategy and competitive advantage

The Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) in terms of strategy has an option to become

modular or turning to the integrated approach. In integration, the people which has an ability to

retain control of the complete production processes and design processes are the integrators (Park,

Lee, Bang et al, 2005). They continue to carry out a wide range of funds in both capacities. Strict

control over the design process provides an advantage to the integrator to retain the technology

leadership. It will be difficult to retain when the technologies are controlled and standardised by

dominant vendor modules. An integrator will also monitor the entire production process and

therefore has a mechanism to control the complexity and quality (Genba, Ogawa, and Kodama,

2005; Lung, 2004).

The strategy problems that are usually encountered by the OEMs is the vehicle comes across a

wider technological ranges to closely research and development, technical problems to integrate

diversity, expensive investments in new plants with regard to production items (Yamaguchi, 2016).

One way to solve these issues is to keep the technical control of design and research and
 17

development. Another way is to switch to modular production processes which are higher in

technological aspects with great dependency on suppliers (Milkovic, Ivkovic and Konecki, 2016).

For example, Mercedes best suits in solving such issues and thus acts as a perfect model (Vickery,

Koufteros, Drge et al, 2015). It is responsible in conducting important research and internal

development, while changing the complexity of the production of large suppliers that produce

modules and make funding which are adjacent to closing assembly plants. At the other end, the

modulators is another option. They will change the complexity of the production suppliers and

follow a way to the modular design which facilitates the process of modularisation and production.

Modulators will increasingly depend on suppliers to offer production experience, technical

expertise and design (Furlan, Cabigiosu and Camuffo, 2014).

Modularising strategy for the OEMs has a risk to lose technical control and a threat of deflation of

the value added source. This is because technical leadership shifts towards suppliers. Retained by

the shadow engineering manufacturer in society reflects this fear in the OEMs (Nunes and Bennett,

2008). On the other hand, the modular value can be maintained through branding, customer

service, the style of innovative products and product concepts in general (for instance; the smart

car). Original Equipment Manufacturers can also maintain added value by means of global

presence, smoothed by reduction in investment that allows outsourcing the support. In reality, the

modulators can be chiefly involved in accepting modules such as cost reduction or asset

minimisation strategy (Gaillard, 2006). Commented [HP1]: TESLA cannot be mentioned as it is a

literature review not analysis
It is very general and should relate to
Tesla Motor INC.
3.6 Findings

Car manufacturers all over the world have shared the manufactured cars in many areas to facilitate

the development process and manage production. Since some automotive manufacturers have
 18

radically re-designed the hierarchies in their process of developing and producing modularisation,

others have also started to explore new relational hierarchies (Baldwin and Clark, 2003).

It is observed that the modularisation process in the automobile industry is mainly adopted by

individual business models. Also, Western car manufacturers use individual modularisation

modules for certain models. There are no cases to adopt the same modules through diverse plants

or models. Similar to the sub-groups and rationalisation of the design applied in the Japanese

automotive industry. In this respect, the process of modularisation in the automotive industry is

fundamentally dissimilar from the open modularisation in the components of PCs, stereo systems

and bicycles. If a car manufacturer outsourced design tasks in huge units to a specific supplier, the

supplier could allow to continue the exchange of components and standardisation to a particular

extent. This is due to the free hand given to supplier (Pandremenos, Paralikas, Salonitis et al 2009).

There is a mutual existence in the certain patterns of modularisation process in the international

automobile industry based on different strategies, capabilities, business environments, and paths

towards modularisation. In addition, a scenario for several modularisation models for diverse

product lines and market segments exists. Other than that a certain pattern might command

significant competitive direction, provided that the complete auto industry might be transformed

into the model of modularisation (Langlois, 2002).

Modularisation in future depends upon the pattern which would permit the auto manufacturers tp

produce and design cars having maximum value for the customers. It is also important to look for

innovation in medium and long-term technology in future. The need which exists urgently is to

protect the environment which has replaced the competition of a new energy source (like fuel cell

or hybrid engines) to accelerate conventional combustion internal engines (Baldwin and Clark,

2006; Langlois, 2002).

 19

With the rapid development of communication and information technology, the development of

Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) has also increased. The importance of IT (Information

Technology) is growing in vehicles that has made the software role more significant. Therefore, it

has the tendency to support the modularisation kind by a separation in the software and hardware

of the automobile components. When these new technologies are implemented practically, the cars

architecture will be completely re-designed and these modifications will unavoidably affect inter-

firm and production systems. It is expected that in such cases of new architectures (for architecture

of the product, inter-firm systems and production systems) in the automotive industry will be

produced by dynamic relations between the trials, modularisation and modern technological

innovations (Larson, Casey, and Howard, 2005).

3.7 Philosophical paradigms

Philosophical paradigms explains a perspective about the research study which is held by the

researchers community. The research paradigm is based on a set of shared concepts, values,

practices and assumptions. The paradigms are concerned with the disciplinary practices or

organisation of framework and holds the identification of the methods, practices and characteristics

which create certain expectations about the research conduct and nature. The research paradigm is

applied to the concept of philosophy when it is appropriate in proposing wide engagement to the

cause of the research problem.

In the context of the research study, the research paradigm is based upon the choices which are the

reflection of the views of the researcher. Therefore, it is based upon epistemological and

methodological assumptions. The belief that certain knowledge of modularisation is created refers

to the epistemology while the methodology is based on the explanation of modularisation

 20

practices. There are two types of paradigms i.e. qualitative and quantitative. This particular

research study is based upon qualitative philosophical paradigms.

3.7.1 Worldview of Researcher

As this research is based upon the methodological assumptions, therefore, the inductive processes

will be followed on account of qualitative research. The inductive process is a process when

empirical observations are used to guide the modular theory development on inferring the general

principles of modularisation from the certain observations of the research.

3.7.2 Experience and Training

The criterion of experience and training refers to the literary writing and library skills as the

research study is based on qualitative analysis.

3.7.3 Psychological Attributes

The psychological attributes refers to the extent of comfortability of the research with respect to

the guidelines and rules of carrying out the research study. This research is carried out more

comfortably as there is absence of the rules. The rules are absent due to the qualitative analysis.

There is high tolerance and longer durations in conducting the research study.

3.7.4 Nature of Research Problem

This particular research is an exploratory research where the proven facts on the research study are

scarce.

3.7.5 Research Audience

The audience of the research study are supportive and accustomed of the philosophical paradigm.

This is because, the research is conducted upon a topic where literature is limited and resources on

modularisation are limited.

 21

3.7.6 The Social and Economic Development Paradigm

The social paradigm of this research is that the research is helpful in contributing factors which

are socially important. Social development is desirable in order to maintain a balance in the society

while the economic development is needed as it is responsible for bringing prosperity to the

countries and their nationals. Still there is an unevenness between the social and economic

paradigms.

3.8 Conclusion

The third chapter is the literature review which is based on explaining the significance of

modularisation. The literature review clarified the fact that the indulgence of modularisation in the

automobile industry helps in creating a competitive edge. The literature review has highlighted the

research works of certain scholars who have discussed that how modularisation helps in improving

the products quality. It has also described an in depth analysis on the modularisation strategy,

techniques and relevant theories upon the research study. Finally, the research paradigms are

explained in context with the research examination.

Working Schedule

The research will be carried on the following pattern based on the Gantt chart show below:

References

Argyres, N. and Bigelow, L., 2010. Innovation, modularity, and vertical deintegration: Evidence

from the early US auto industry. Organization Science, 21(4), pp.842-853.

Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2000. Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). MIT press.
 22

Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2002. The option value of modularity in design. Harvard NOM

Research Paper, 1, pp.1-14.

Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2003. Managing in an age of modularity. Managing in the modular

age: Architectures, networks, and organizations, 149, pp.84-93.

Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B., 2006. Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems.

In Complex engineered systems (pp. 175-205). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Fogliatto, F.S., Da Silveira, G.J. and Borenstein, D., 2012. The mass customization decade: An

updated review of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), pp.14-

25.

Fourcade, F. and Midler, C., 2004. Modularisation in the auto industry: can manufacturer's

architectural strategies meet supplier's sustainable profit trajectories?. International Journal of

Automotive Technology and Management, 4(2-3), pp.240-260.

Fourcade, F. and Midler, C., 2005. The role of 1st tier suppliers in automobile product

modularisation: the search for a coherent strategy. International Journal of Automotive

Technology and Management, 5(2), pp.146-165.

Fujimoto, T. and Takeishi, A., 2001. Automobiles: strategy-based lean production system.

Fujimoto, T., 2014. The long tail of the auto industry life cycle. Journal of Product Innovation

Management, 31(1), pp.8-16.

Furlan, A., Cabigiosu, A. and Camuffo, A., 2014. When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and

technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), pp.789-807.

 23

Gaillard, C.L., 2006. An analysis of the impact of modularization and standardization of vehicles

electronics architecture on the automotive industry (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute

of Technology).

Genba, K., Ogawa, H. and Kodama, F., 2005. Quantitative analysis of modularization in the

automobile and PC industries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(2), pp.231-245.

Guerzoni, M., 2014. Variety in the automobile industry. In Product Variety in Automotive

Industry (pp. 1-12). Springer International Publishing.

Hsuan Mikkola, J. and Skjtt-Larsen, T., 2004. Supply-chain integration: implications for mass

customization, modularization and postponement strategies. Production Planning &

Control, 15(4), pp.352-361.

Hsuan, J., 1999. Impacts of supplierbuyer relationships on modularization in new product

development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 5(3), pp.197-209.

Ikeda, M. and Nakagawa, Y., 2001. Two ways of modularization strategy in Japan: Toyota-Honda

vs. Nissan-Mazda. documento presentado al noveno encuentro de la GERPISA, disponible en

http://www. univ-evry. fr/labos/gerpisa, Paris, pp.7-9.

Langlois, R.N., 1999. Modularity in technology, organization, and society.

Langlois, R.N., 2002. Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of economic behavior

& organization, 49(1), pp.19-37.

Larson, G.L., Casey, C.J. and Howard, C.E., 2005. International Truck Intellectual Property

Company, Llc. Modularized power take-off systems for vehicles. U.S. Patent 6,963,796.
 24

Luccarelli, M., Matt, D.T. and Spena, P.R., 2015. Modular architectures for future alternative

vehicles. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 67(4), pp.368-387.

Lung, Y., 2004. The changing geography of the European automobile system. International

Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 4(2-3), pp.137-165.

Lung, Y., Salerno, M.S., Zilbovicius, M. and Dias, A.V.C., 1999. Flexibility through modularity:

experimentations with fractal production in Brazil and in Europe. Coping with Variety: Flexible

Production Systems for Product Variety in the Auto Industry. Abingdon, Oxon: Ashgate.

MacDuffie, J.P., 2006, June. Modularity and the automobile: What happened when the concept hit

the road. In International Motor Vehicle Program Automotive Mini Conference.

McDermott, G., Mudambi, R. and Parente, R., 2013. Strategic modularity and the architecture of

multinational firm. Global Strategy Journal, 3(1), pp.1-7.

Milkovic, H., Ivkovic, N. and Konecki, M., 2016. A Real-World Implementation of IoT

Automobiles. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 5(6), p.222.

Nunes, B. and Bennett, D., 2008. The contribution of modularity to green operations

practices. Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, 5(2), pp.93-108.

Pandremenos, J., Paralikas, J., Salonitis, K. and Chryssolouris, G., 2009. Modularity concepts for

the automotive industry: A critical review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and

Technology, 1(3), pp.148-152.

Park, S.W., Lee, J.K., Bang, J.S. and Shin, B.C., 2005, May. Development of an e-engineering

framework for automotive module design. In International Conference on Computer Supported

Cooperative Work in Design (pp. 264-273). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

 25

Prez, J., Gonzlez, C., Milans, V., Onieva, E., Godoy, J. and de Pedro, T., 2009, April.

Modularity, adaptability and evolution in the autopia architecture for control of autonomous

vehicles. In Mechatronics, 2009. ICM 2009. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Sako, M. and Murray, F., 1999. Modules in design, production and use: implications for the global

auto industry. In IMVP Annual Sponsors Meeting.

Salerno, M.S. and Dias, A.V.C., 1999. Product design modularity, modular production, modular

organization: the evolution of modular concepts. Automotive Industries, 3, pp.61-73.

Salerno, M.S., 2001. The characteristics and the role of modularity in the automotive

business. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 1(1), pp.92-107.

Takeishi, A. and Fujimoto, T., 2001. Modularisation in the auto industry: interlinked multiple

hierarchies of product, production and supplier systems. International Journal of Automotive

Technology and Management, 1(4), pp.379-396.

Takeishi, A. and Fujimoto, T., 2003. Modularization in the car industry: Interlinked multiple

hierarchies of product, production, and supplier systems. The business of systems integration,

pp.254-278.

Ulrich, K., 1994. Fundamentals of product modularity. In Management of Design (pp. 219-231).

Springer Netherlands.

Vickery, S.K., Koufteros, X., Drge, C. and Calantone, R., 2015. Product Modularity, Process

Modularity, and New Product Introduction Performance: Does Complexity Matter?. Production

and Operations Management.

 26

Wang, H. and Huang, M., 2010, July. Modularity and discontinuous innovation: A patent data

analysis in automobile industry. In Technology Management for Global Economic Growth

(PICMET), 2010 Proceedings of PICMET'10: (pp. 1-7). IEEE.

Xue-Jie, B.A.I., 2005. Revolution of Automobile Industry in Modularization Era [J]. China

Industrial Economy, 9.

Yamaguchi, N., 2016. Changes in Product Development Approaches and Target

Costing. Management of Innovation Strategy in Japanese Companies, 13, p.145.

Flick, U., 2015. Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research

project. Sage.

MacDuffie, J.P., 2013. Modularityasproperty, modularizationasprocess, and modularity'as

frame: Lessons from product architecture initiatives in the global automotive industry. Global

Strategy Journal, 3(1), pp.8-40.

Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M., 2015. Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

Milkovic, H., Ivkovic, N. and Konecki, M., 2016. A Real-World Implementation of IoT

Automobiles. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 5(6), p.222.

Mohan, N., Trngren, M., Izosimov, V., Kaznov, V., Roos, P., Svahn, J., Gustavsson, J. and Nesic,

D., 2016, April. Challenges in architecting fully automated driving; with an emphasis on heavy
 27

commercial vehicles. In Automotive Systems/Software Architectures (WASA), 2016 Workshop

on (pp. 2-9). IEEE.

Yamaguchi, N., 2016. Changes in Product Development Approaches and Target Costing.

Management of Innovation Strategy in Japanese Companies, 13, p.145.