Basic concepts
Council Directives 89/106/EEC
Essential Requirements (1989)
Mechanical resistance and stability
Safety in case of fire
Hygiene, health and environment
Safety in use
Protection against noise
Energy economy and heat retention
Interpretative documents ID1 to ID6
Name
EUROCODES Publishing
EN 1990: Basis of Structural design 2002
EN 1991: Actions on structures 2002
EN 1992: Design of concrete structures 2004
EN 1993: Design of steel structures 2004
EN 1994: Design of composite structures 2004
EN 1995: Design of timber structures 2004
EN 1996: Design of masonry structures 2004
EN 1997: Geotechnical design 2004
EN 1998: Design of structures for earthquake 2004
EN 1999: Design of aluminium structures 2004
DAV: EN 1990, DAV: 2002-04-24
EN 1991-1-1, DAV: 2002-04-24
EN 1991-1-2, DAV: 2002-11-20
EN 1991-1-3, DAV: 2003-07-16
Some basic definitions
Enclosing a space
1,5NL/(hf)
M=NL/4< f bh2/6 A=bh>1,5NL/(hf)
Span, cost utility
Reliability of load bearing structures
Reliability - property (probability) of a structure to
fulfil required functions during a specified life time
under given conditions
- reliability survival probability Ps = 1 - Pf
- functional (performance) requirements
- des
design
g wo
working g lifee T
- given conditions
Failure probability Pf or the reliability index - is
the most important measure of structural reliability
Pf < Pf, t ; > t = -1
N ( Pf )
Pf 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7
1,28 2,32 3,09 3,72 4,27 4,75 5,20
Basic concepts of current codes
Design situations
Persistent - normal use
Transient - execution, repairs
Accidental - explosion,
p , impact
p
Seismic - seismic events
Design working life
Replaceable parts 1 to 5 years
Temporary structures 25 years
Buildings 50 years
Bridges, monuments 100 years
Accidental Design Situation - Fire
G+Q
Resistance R
Fire qfi
td > td,regu, Ed < Rd,d <cr,d | fire
Limit states
Limit states - states beyond which the structure no longer fulfils
the relevant design (performance) criteria
Ultimate limit states
loss of equilibrium of the structure as a rigid body
failure, collapse, loss of stability
failure caused by fatigue or other time dependent effects
Serviceability limit states
- the functioning of the structure under normal use
- the comfort of people
- the appearance of the construction works
Ultimate and serviceability limit states
Behaviour of a reinforced concrete beam
Cracks
- tensile vertical
- tensile inclined
- shear
- compression
The beam may have several
possible modes of failure:
- cracking
- deflection
- shear
- bending
Robustness structural integrity
Structures should be designed in such a way that they exhibit
robustness to the effect of impact or explosion.
Ronan point 1967
The measures bonds, ties
explosen on the 20th
storey Peripheral ties at Internal ties
each floor - ring
beam
Continuous
vertical ties
In columns
and walls
Columns and wall
ties anchored into
structure at each
floor
Robustness
Disintegration due to explosion
Ties to secure robustness
Horizontal tie Vertical ties
Partial collapse of untied components
Untied components, spalling of cover zone, partial collapse
Structural continuity
Overall stiffness
Two dimensional robustness
Durability concrete cover
Durability - Reinforcement corrosion
Concrete cover and quality
Methods of reliability verification
Historical and empirical methods
Permissible stresses
Safet factor methods
Safety
Partial factor methods
Probabilistic methods
Risk assessment
Increasing demands on design procedure
The Oldest
Building Law
Hammourabi, Babylon, 2200 BC
If a house collapses and causes the
death of the owner - the builder of
that house shall be put to death
Variables
Basic variables in general random variables
actions F
properties of materials f
geometric data a
Cumulative variables random variables
load effect E(F, f, a)
structural resistance R (F, f, a)
Model uncertainties
uncertainty of load effect E (F, f, a)
uncertainty of resistance R (F, f, a)
uncertainty of semi resulting variables
All variables may be time invariant (permanent load, geometric data)
or time variant (variable actions, material properties) - then time t
Partial safety factors
Actions - design values Fd = F Fk
Properties of materials - d. v. f d = f k / f
Dimensions - design v. ad = a k a
E d ( Fd , f d , a d ) < R d ( Fd , f d , a d )
Example
Ed = GGk + QQk < Rd = A fyk /M
Classification of actions F
Permanent Variable Accidental
G Q A
- Self-weight, fixed - Imposed - Explosion
equipment loads - Fire
- Prestressing - Snow - Impact of
- Actions due to - Wind vehicles
water and earth - Indirect,
- Indirect actions, e.g. due to
e.g. due to sagging temperature
of fundaments
The characterisic values of actions
Probability density (x)
0,4
0,3
Actions F: 0,2
Characteristic Standard deviation
value xk=x0,05
G, Q, P, g, q, p 0,1
p = 0,05
0 05 The mean 1- p = 0,05
(x-)/
0,0
-3,5 -2,5 -1,5 -0,5 0,5 1,5 2,5 3,5
Random variable X having the normal distribution
The characteristic values Fk: Gk, Qk, Pk, gk, qk, pk
The design values: Fd = F Fk
The design values of parmanent atcions: Gd = G Gk
- variable actions: Qd = Q Qk nebo Qd = Q i Qk = Q Qrep
where Qrep = i Qk denotes representative value of Q
Factors G and Q
EN 1990, 24.04.2002
Limit state Load effect G Q
A-EQU Unfavourable 1,10 1,50
Favourable 0,90 0,00
B-STR/GEO Unfavourable 1,35 1,50
Favourable 1,00 0,00
C- STR/GEO Unfavourable 1,00 1,30
Favourable 1,00 0,00
Partial factors
Yield strength
Relative frequency Density Plot (Shifted Lognormal) - [A1_792]
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
Outliers
0.000
210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420
Yield strength [MPa]
Partial factors of structural steel: s= 1,0; 1,10; 1,15; 1,20
Reinforcement: s = 1,15
A steel rod
Load effect Resistance
R General E=G+Q R = A fy
Design Ed = GGk + QQk Rd = A fyk /M = A fyd
values
Ed < Rd A > Ed / fyd, or
Design of GGk + QQk < A fyk /M
rod area A
A > (GGk + QQk) / (fyk /M)
E
An example: Gk = 0,6 MN, Qk = 0,4 MN, G= 1,35 , Q= 1,5
Ed = 1,35.0,6+1,5.0,4 = 1,41 MN
fyk = 235 MPa, M = 1,10, fyd = fyk/ M= 214 MPa
A > Ed / fyd = 1,41/214 = 0,00659 m2 = 65,9 cm2
A reinforced concrete fbeam or slab c
bxfc
0,8x x
M
d z h
As Asfy
a
f c 2 2M
As = b h a ( h a ) - As M/(z fy) z 0,9 d
f y f cb
Example:
Md = 0,1 MNm, d = 0.42 m, steel S500fyk=500 MPA, s=1,15
fyd = 500/1,15 = 435 MPA, z = 0,9d = 0,378 m,
As 0,1/0,378/435 = 6,08 10-4 m2 = 608 mm2
A short column with centric load
For a very small eccentricity, for fixed column for h > l/10
Nd = 0,8 Ac fcd + As fyd
= 0,8 b h fcd + As fyd As h
a
b
Design of the column dimensions:
b2 = h2 = (Nd - As fyd) / (0,8 fcd)
chosen As~ 0.01 b h
b2 = h2 = Nd / ( 0,01 fyd + 0,8 fcd)
b > 0,20 m, commonly 0,30 a 0,50 m
Condition for reinforcement area: 0,003 < As< 0,08
An example
Design load effect
Nd 1000 kN = 1 MN
Design strengths
fyd = 500/1,15
500/1 15 = 435 MPa , fcd= 20/1,5=
20/1 5= 13,3
13 3 MPa
Chosen reinforecement area
As~ 0.01 b h < 0,08 b h
b2 = h2 = Nd / ( 0,01 fyd + 0,8 fcd) = 1/15 = 0,067
b = h = 0,26 ~ 0,30 m > 0,20 m
Load Combinations
EN 1990, 24.04.2002
Ultimate limit states:
- Persistent and transient design situation:
EQU - equilibrium (6.7)
STR - structure (6.10)
GEO - soil or rock (6.10)
FAT - fatigue (general rules)
- Accidental and seismic des. s. (6.11), (6.12)
Serviceability:
Characteristic - irreversible (6.14)
Frequent - reversible (6.15)
Quasi-permanent - long-term effects (6.16)
Ultimate Limit States
Persistent and transient situation - fundamental combination
Leading and accompanying variable actions
j 1
Gj G k j + P Pk + Q 1Q k 1 + Qi 0 i Q i
i >1
( 6 .10 )
or
j 1
Gj G kj + P Pk + i 1
Qi 0 i Qi ( 6.10 a )
j 1
j Gj G k j + P Pk + Q 1Q k 1 + Qi 0 i Q i
i >1
(6.10b)
Accidental design situation
G
j 1
kj + Pk + Ad + ( 11 or 21) Qk1 +
i >1
2i Qki (6.11b)
Seismic design situation
j 1
Gj G k j + Pk + I AEd + 2 i Q k i
i 1
( 6 .12 b )
Serviceability Limit States
The characteristic - irreversible effects
G
j 1
kj + Pk + Qk1 + 0 i Qi
i >1
(6 .14 )
Frequent
F t combination
bi ti - reversible
ibl andd local
l l effects
ff t
G
j 1
kj + Pk + 11Qk1 + 2 i Qki
i >1
( 6 .15 )
Quasi-permanent combination - long-term effects
G
j 1
kj + Pk + 2 i Qki
i 1
( 6 .17 )
Leading variable action
S
hs
hs
W
n hs Q hs
W a2
a1 a1 a1
Design Values of Actions
The load effect Ed
- exceeded with the probability ( 0,7 )
- Permanent loads Gd = G Qk, reduction factor
- Variable actions Qd = Q Qk, factors
-- Combination value 0Qk
- exceeded by with the increased probability
( 0,7 0,4 )
-- Frequent value 1Qk
- exceeded during 0,01 of a reference period
-- Quasi-permanent value 2Qk
- exceeded during 0,5 of a reference period
Representative Values of Q
Characteristic value Qk
Arbitrary--point -in time Q
t1 t2 t3
Combination value 0Qk
Frequent value1Qk
Quasi-permanent value 2Qk
Time
Factors i
EN 1990, 24.04.2002
Actions 0 1 2
Imposed
p A,, B 0,7
, 0,5
, 0,3
,
Imposed C, D 0,7 0,7 0,6
Imposed E 1,0 0,9 0,8
Snow 0,5-0,7 0,2-0,5 0,0-0,2
Wind 0,6 0,2 0,0
Temperature 0,6 0,5 0,0
Cantilever beam
Actions g1, g2, q1, q2, G
g1 q1 g2 q2 G
The maximum bending
(a) (c) (b) (d)
moment at (b) and reaction B A B
l1 = 4,5 m l2 = 3,0 m
g1 q1 g2 G
The maximum moment v (c)
(a) (c) (b) (d)
A B
l1 = 4,5 m l2 = 3,0 m
g1 g2 q2 G
Static equilibrium (the
minimmu reaction A) A
(a) (c)
B
(b) (d)
l1 = 4,5 m l2 = 3,0 m
Cantilevered Beam g1 q1 g2 q2 G
(a) (c) (b) (d)
A B
l1 = 4,5 m l2 = 3,0 m
Load Limit state Action
case g1 g2 q1 q2 G
1 Equilibrium, eq. (6.7) 0,90 1,10 - 1,50 1,10
2 Ultimate, eq. (6.10) (c) 1,35 1,00 1,50 - 1,00
3 Ultimate eq.
Ultimate, eq (6.10)
(6 10) (b) 1 00
1,00 1 35
1,35 - 1 50
1,50 1 35
1,35
4 Ultimate, eq. (6.10) 1,35 1,35 1,50 1,50 1,35
5 Ultimate, eq. (6.10a) (c) 1,35 1,00 1,500,7 - 1,00
6 Ultimate, eq. (6.10b) (c) 0,851,35 1,00 1,50 - 1,00
7 Ultimate, eq. (6.10a) (b) 1,00 1,35 - 1,500,7 1,35
8 Ultimate, eq. (6.10b) (b) 1,00 0,851,35 - 1,50 0,851,35
9 Serviceability, eq. (6.14) 1,00 1,00 1,00 - 1,00
10 Serviceability, eq. (6.14) 1,00 1,00 - 1,00 1,00
11 Serviceability, eq. (6.15) 1,00 1,00 1,000,5 - 1,00
12 Serviceability, eq. (6.15) 1,00 1,00 - 1,000,5 1,00
13 Serviceability, eq. (6.16) 1,00 1,00 1,000,3 - 1,00
14 Serviceability, eq. (6.16) 1,00 1,00 - 1,000,3 1,00
Load Effects
-64.8
Eq(6.7) - shear
1 2 3
1 2
-4.0 6.6
Eq. (6.10) 96.6 Eq. (6.10a) and (6.10b)
bending moments -176,2 bending moments -159,1
-85,5
-85,5
1 2 3 1 2 3
1 2 1 2
40,5
47,8
Origin and causes of structural failure
Origin Design Execution Use Other
20% 50% 15% 15%
Causes Gross errors Actions
80% 20%
Gross errors can be limited by quality
control during design, execution and use.
Risk Assessment
System Definition
Hazard Identification
Propability P Consequences C
Risk Ass. R = P C
Criteria R < Rt
Summary - the most important points
Historical methods of reliability verification
Classification of basic variables
Uncertainties and possibility of their description
Definition of reliability reliability measures
Reliability differentiation in international documents
Concepts of design situations and limit states
Structural integrity - robustness
Principles of partial factor method
Combination of actions and reliability elements
General procedure of risk assessment
Origin and causes of structural failure
Links between the Eurocodes
Basis of design,
structural safety,
EN 1990
serviceability and
durability
EN 1991 Actions on structures,
ppermanent,, variable,,
accidental
EN 1992 EN 1993 EN 1994 Design and detailing
EN 1995 EN 1996 EN 1999 for structures made of
different materials
EN 1997 EN 1998 Geotechnical and
Seismic design
Concrete creep
Deformation of concrete
The durability chart
Resistance - design statistics
The characteristic strength
