ONE WAY ANOVA
Null hypothesis (Ho) :-
There is no difference between the Age group of the employees and the variable towards quality
of work life balance
Alternate hypothesis (H1) :-
There is difference between the Age group of the employees and the variable towards quality of
work life balance
ANOVA
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
How following factors Between Groups 1.746 3 .582 .513 .674
affects you in balancing Within Groups 131.579 116 1.134
your work life any family Total
133.325 119
commitments-Work hours
How following factors Between Groups 1.635 3 .545 .359 .783
affects you in balancing Within Groups 176.157 116 1.519
your work life any family
Total
commitments-Work from 177.792 119
home after office hours
How following factors Between Groups 1.393 3 .464 .374 .772
affects you in balancing Within Groups 144.073 116 1.242
your work life any family Total
commitments-Excessive 145.467 119
household work
How following factors Between Groups .521 3 .174 .287 .869
affects you in balancing Within Groups 132.646 116 1.144
your work life any family Total
commitments- Negative
133.167 119
attitude of
superiors/colleagues
Inference: from the table it is found that (work hours F = 0.513, p= 0.674, work from home F =
0.359, p= 0.783, excessive household work F= 0.374 , p= 0.772 , negative attitude of superior F
= 0.287, p= 0.869) the age group at 5% . Here f is greater than p value. So reject null hypothesis.
There is difference between the Age group of the employees and the variable towards quality of
work life balance