CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Technologies for CO2 Capture
From Electric Power Plants
The Energy Center at Discovery Park
Purdue University
CCTR, Potter Center Suite 270
500 Central Avenue
West Lafayette, IN 47907
http://discoverypark.purdue.edu/wps/portal/Energy/CCTR
Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin Email:
[email protected]CCTR Basic Facts File #4
The Energy Center at Discovery Park
Purdue University
CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022
http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/
February 2007
Email: [email protected]
Revised March 2008
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Carbon Sequestration Program
OBJECTIVE:
To capture by 2012 fossil fuel conversion
systems that offer 90% CO2 capture with 99%
storage permanence at less than a 10% increase
in the cost of energy services
2
Source: http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/sequestration/publications/programplans/2006/2006_sequestration_roadmap.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Worldwide CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuel
Combustion & Cement Manufacture (BTons/year)
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
Carbon Sequestration Program
To capture by 2012 fossil fuel conversion
World Total Coal Consumption
systems
that= 5.44
offer
90%
CO2 capture with 99%
in 2003
Billion
Tons
storageU.S.
permanence
at less than a 10% increase
Total Coal Consumption
in 2003of
= 1.095
Billionservices
Tons
in the cost
energy
3
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/ieoreftab_6.pdf
Source: http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/sequestration/publications/programplans/2006/2006_sequestration_roadmap.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
U.S. power plants
produce 5.8 BTons
of CO2 /year
Affordable technologies
need to be developed
that can capture CO2
& use it commercially or
safely store it away from
the environment for
centuries. Ultimate goal
is to enable power
generators to continue
using available coal to
provide adequate, secure,
affordable electricity as
the industry develops
economic CO2-free
alternatives. Currently
clean coal technologies
appear the least costly
& most secure national
energy supply for
electricity generation
4
Source: EPRI 2006, http://mydocs.epri.com/docs/CorporateDocuments/EPRI_Journal/2006-Summer/1013720_ClimatePolicy.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Emission Factors
EPA CO2 Emissions Factors
207 lbs per MBtu for coal
168 lb per MBtu oil
117 lb per MBtu natural gas
EPRI guideline
150 Tons of CO2 /day for 10 MW power plant
Babcock & Wilcox
Modern coal-fired plant with 9000Btu/hr heat rate
will produce about 1800 lb of CO2 per MWh
Source: Coal Energy Systems, Bruce G. Miller, 2005, p.376
http://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2003/CO2_Power_Fossil_Fuels.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Emission Factors for Coal
Different rank coals produce different amounts
of lbs CO2 per MBtu
In pounds of CO2 per Million Btu
U.S. average factors (EIA):
227.4 lbs/MBtu for anthracite
216.3 lbs/MBtu for lignite
211.9 lbs/MBtu for sub-bituminous coal &
205.3 lbs/MBtu for bituminous coal (IN 203.6)
Indiana Coal = 22.2 MBtu/Ton
2.28 Tons CO2 per Ton Coal
6
Souce: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/quarterly/co2_article/co2.html
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 & MWh per Ton Coal for Indiana
Indiana Coal:
203.6 lbs CO2 per MBtu & 2.28 Tons CO2 per Ton Coal
2006 Indiana electricity generated = 110,000,000 MWh
2006 Coal consumed for power = 60,582,000 Tons
Indiana average MWh per Ton coal used
= 1.82 MWh per Ton Coal (110,000,000/60,582,000)
1 Ton Coal produces 2.28 Tons CO2 & 1.82 MWh
& so 1MWh of power produces about 1.25 Tons of CO2
7
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/acr/table26.html
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table1_6_a.html
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Typical Coal-Fired Power Plant Emissions
Sources: http://www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2003/CO2_Power_Fossil_Fuels.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
The Combustion Process
Combustion is the conversion of a substance called
a fuel into chemical compounds known as products
of combustion by combination with an oxidizer.
The combustion process is an exothermic chemical
reaction, i.e., a reaction that releases energy as it
occurs. Combustion may be represented by:
High temperature & pressure
Fuel + Oxidizer
Products of combustion + Energy
Emissions of CO2, SO2 , Ash
9
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Combustion of a Simple Fuel
Methane, CH4, is a common fuel & a major constituent of
most natural gases. Consider combustion of methane in
pure oxygen. The chemical reaction equation may be
written as:
CH4 + 2O2
CO2 + 2H2O
Atoms are neither created nor destroyed. Methane
consists of 1 atom of carbon & 4 atoms of hydrogen. It
reacts with 4 atoms of oxygen to yield carbon dioxide &
water products with the same number of atoms of each
element as in the reactants
Carbon dioxide is the product formed by complete
combustion of carbon through the reaction C + O2
CO2
10
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Emissions from Power Plants
U.S. power plants produce 2.5 Billion Tons of CO2 /year
Indiana power plants produce 0.148 Billion Tons CO2 /year
CO2 Emissions in 2002 & 2003
In the U.S. rose about 1%
& in China rose at 8-9% per year
2005 concentrations rose 0.5% to 379 PPM
CO2 remains in the atmosphere for hundreds of years
11
Source: P.Williams, G.Pavlovicz, Babcock & Wilcox Technical Paper, Flue Gas Treatment System Design
Considerations for the City of Hamilton (Ohio) Oxygen Firing Demonstration, Presented to EPRI-DOE-EPA-AWMA, August 28-31, 2006, Baltimore
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Power Plant CO2 Capture & Storage
CO2 can be captured by:
Amine scrubbing
~ Post combustion
IGCC power plants
~ Pre combustion
Oxygen combustion
~ Oxyfuel
CO2 can be stored in:
Coal fields
Saline aquifers
Oil fields
12
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Main Processes for CO2 Capture
13
Source: http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/sequestration/publications/programplans/2006/2006_sequestration_roadmap.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Post Combustion Capture, Amine Scrubbing
MEA, Mono-Ethanol Amine
absorption process
Amines - Any of a class of nitrogen- containing organic
compounds derived from ammonia NH3
CO2 capture & storage using amine-based scrubbers, the only
proven process to date, can consume up to a third of the plants
power output & increase the cost of electricity by 60% to 80%.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amide, http://arch.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc/docs/css2002/ccs02-kt.pdf
EPRI & Nexant, http://www.co2captureandstorage.info/docs/capture/M-Rhudy.pdf
14
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Capture by Amine Scrubbing, Costs
Over 75% of the cost & energy drain is due to the capture process
(including compression & transportation to the disposal site)
Pilot-scale tests & modeling efforts show that operating an
amine stripper at a vacuum can provide a 5-10% reduction
in energy use per unit of CO2 captured
Amine scrubbers with CO2 compressions to 1200psi costs
$2000/kW & reduces the net power output by 12.5%
The cost of CO2 capture, is on the order of $150 per ton of
carbon - much too high for carbon emissions reduction
applications. Adding existing technologies for CO2 capture to an
electricity generation process will considerably increase the
cost of electricity depending on the type of process
15
Sources: http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/sequestration/publications/programplans/2006/2006_sequestration_roadmap.pdf
Bruce G. Miller Coal Energy Systems, 2005
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Post Combustion CO2 Gas Treatment Process
Two stages:
Absorber
Stripper
Absorber
Solvent removes
majority of CO2
by chemical
absorption
Stripper
Heat is applied to release the
CO2 & regenerate solvent
Flue Gas
16
Source: EPRI, John Wheeldon et al, Post-Combustion CO2 Capture from Pulverized Coal Plants
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Post Combustion - Chilled Ammonia Process
2006 Process Cost Prediction by EPRI
PC - Pulverized Coal
MEA - Mono-Ethanol Amine
CO2 - Carbon Dioxide
NH3 - Ammonia
NH3 is extensively used to manufacture fertilizers & a wide
variety of nitrogen-containing organic & inorganic chemicals
17
Source: EPRI & Nexant, http://www.co2captureandstorage.info/docs/capture/M-Rhudy.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Chilled Ammonia
2006 Process Performance Prediction
18
Source: EPRI & Nexant, http://www.co2captureandstorage.info/docs/capture/M-Rhudy.pdf
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Pre Combustion Process
CO2 Capture by IGCC Power Plants
CO2 capture
EPRI:
In 2000 the IGCC
process was
cheaper than
post combustion
CO2 capture
but all technologies
are now improving
IGCC Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
Source: EPRI, John Wheeldon et al, Post-Combustion CO2 Capture from Pulverized Coal Plants
19
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Pre Combustion Process
CO2 Capture by IGCC Power Plants
Gasifier
CO2
Separation
In the water gas shift (WGS)
reactor H2O & CO react to
form CO2 & H2 (water splitting)
Source: http://arch.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc/docs/css2002/ccs02-kt.pdf
20
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
EPRI 2003 Cost of Electricity with Pre & Post
Combustion CO2 Capture 4 Plants & 2 Coals
Technology
Pittsburg #8
Sub-bituminous
Texaco quench IGCC
$56.3/MWh
$62.2/MWh
SC PC
61.7
60.4
USC PC
57.0
56.2
USC PC + X
47.5
46.6
IGCC Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
Pre combustion CO2 capture
SC PC Supercritical Pulverized Coal Plant
Post combustion CO2 capture with sterically-hindered amines
USC PC Ultra-supercritical Pulverized Coal Plant with Double Reheat
Post combustion CO2 capture with sterically-hindered amines
USC PC + X Ultra-supercritical Pulverized Coal Plant with Double Reheat
- Post combustion CO2 capture with ammonium carbonate & improved boiler
Costs of IGCC & other technologies are changing
Source: EPRI, John Wheeldon et al, Post-Combustion CO2 Capture from Pulverized Coal Plants, Table 5, page 14
21
CCTR
Oxyfuel, An Emerging Technology
Oxyfuel combustion is an emerging technology that has
the potential to allow for control of CO2 emissions at a
low cost. Oxyfuel combustion involves replacing air with
pure oxygen in a pulverized coal boiler. The use of O2
results in a lower volume of flue gas with a much
higher concentration of CO2.
Combusting coal in pure O2 results in temperatures that
are too high for existing boiler and turbine materials. Part
of the CO2 rich flue gas is recycled to the boiler to reduce
the exhaust temperature.
The cost of carbon capture in an oxyfuel power plant
should be lower than for a conventional air-fired PC
plant, as a result of the decreased flue gas volume and
increased concentration of CO2. However, these
advantages are offset, to some extent, by the cost of
providing oxygen and the cost of the recycle compressor.
Source: NETL, Southern Research Institute
22
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Oxyfuel
CO2 Capture by Oxygen Combustion
Natural Gas
In such a power generation application the resulting effluent is a
CO2 rich flue gas (up to 98% vol., dry) that can be removed for
utilization of disposal with minimum additional flue gas treatment
Source: http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/98/98ps/ps4-4.pdf
23
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
Oxyfuel
CO2 Capture by Oxygen Combustion
Using O2 instead of air during the combustion process produces
a flue gas that is 90% pure CO2 & is already at low pressure
(10-15psi). However this requires three times more O2 per kWh
of electricity generation than gasification
No oxyfuel PC power plants are in commercial operation in the U.S.
Processes & tests for developing Oxyfuel technology:
* Advanced combustion in mixtures of O2 & recycled flue gas
* Burners that incorporate a membrane to extract O2 from air
* How to lower the cost of retrofit systems
Source: Coal Energy Systems, Bruce G. Miller, 2005, p.378
24
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Capture/Storage Status
All current methods of CO2 separation/capture cause an
additional high energy demand which results from the
actual separation, the regeneration of solvents, the
poorer efficiency of the core process, & the energy
required for the compression & drying of the CO2 into a
transportable & storable state. Advances are being
made in assessing the economics of various methods
for large scale commercialization
CO2 capture costs for retrofitting existing coal-fired
power plants represent an approximate increase of
20% to 40% in the cost of electricity
25
Source: http://www.isi.fhg.de/publ/downloads/isi06b46/CO2-captures-storage.pdf
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/01968904/2003/00000044/00000019/art00040
CCTR
Oxyfuel Retrofits for Existing PC Boilers
Recovering CO2 from the flue gas at a PC-fired boiler
will significantly increase the cost of electricity. The main
reasons are that the volume of gas is very large & the
concentration of CO2 is low, (< 15%). Commercially
available absorption processes, such as amine based
systems, require large vessels & consume considerable
parasitic power. Development of oxyfuel technology
will simplify carbon capture in PC-fired power plants
by minimizing the volume of flue gas produced & vastly
increasing the CO2 concentration, thereby significantly
reducing CO2 capture cost. Successfully retrofitting
oxyfuel technology into existing PC power plants
should enable CO2 capture goals to be met at a
lower costs than constructing all new facilities.
Source: NETL, Southern Research Institute
26
CCTR
Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research
CO2 Capture/Storage Summary
There is no zero-emission power station, only
low-emission power stations. In installations with
post-combustion or pre-combustion CO2 capture, the
capture rates could be between 85% and 95%
of the emitted CO2
The additional costs for the control of CO2 from
power stations are significant. Additional technology
for CO2 capture & compression/storage could
result in over 50% increases in the cost of
electricity. With future improvements in technology
the capital costs for CO2 controls should decrease
Source: http://www.isi.fhg.de/publ/downloads/isi06b46/CO2-captures-storage.pdf
27
