Lessons Learned: Avoid Costly Problems With
Your Subsea Cable Installation & Maintenance
PO.15
Joel Whitman
Global Marine Energy
A majority of projects undertaken in the North Sea and other EU
waters have experienced significant Subsea Cable problems:
Why has this happened?
Lack of risk analysis involving those that know
Inaccurate assumptions are often made
Little attention paid to cable risks
Technical complexity not understood
Little involvement of installation expertise at planning
Weather, current and tidal impacts not anticipated
Crossings rarely considered in detail
Survey results are not fully representative of routes
Permit conditions cannot be met
Weather will not necessarily follow historical patterns
General underestimation how difficult marine installation can be
Critical Design details often incomplete/change
Unrealistic Planning and permit conditions regarding
Routing, layout, burial depth, beach approach,
shore-end hook-up
Crossing agreements, equipment
Installation methodology
Shallow water layouts and anchor spreads
J-tube solution, cable protection and sub-station layout
Cable crossing methodology
Bend Restrictor, cable protection selection and methodology
What can be done?
Account for Cable Installation at Concept stage
Cable Plant
Construction,
O&M
Concept
C
oncept
Bury at a depth appropriate to your location, using the right tool
Cost
Expenditure
Influence
Engineering
ng
BPI=2
Install
Commission
completion
Project Timeline
Burial Depth (m)
Procurement
start
BPI & cable size
determine tool
size and power
BPI=3
BPI=1
Soft
clay
Loose
sand
Medium
sand
Dense sand
Medium clay
Stiff
clay
Weathered
Chalk
Rock
Courtesy of SMD
Choose the correct vessel for the project
Prepare for Cable Maintenance & Repair it will happen
Installing cable offshore is highly complex
Realistic and detailed risk assessment,
planning & permitting
Correct vessels, equipment & experience
Comprehensive operations & maintenance plan
www.globalmarinesystemsenergy.com
EWEA Offshore 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands