Ground Freezing
Uploaded by
Fahad ZulfiqarGround Freezing
Uploaded by
Fahad Zulfiqar- Introduction
- Principles of Freezing
- How Ground Freezing Works
- Refrigeration Systems
- Ground Freezing for Shoring & Groundwater Cutoff
- Applications
- References
Common questions
Powered by AIGround freezing is effective for shoring in deep excavations because it renders water-bearing strata temporarily impermeable by transforming joint water into ice, thereby increasing the compressive and shear strength of the ground. The process eliminates the need to inject extraneous materials and is applicable to a wide range of soils. The transformation of water to ice cements particles, improving strength to that of soft or medium rock, and creating a reliable temporary support system. Freezing can stabilize fine silts, which are difficult to stabilize by other methods, and maintains stability as long as the freezing process is actively preserved with refrigeration .
The challenges of using ground freezing include the significant time required to establish a substantial ice wall and the need to maintain continuous refrigeration. Inconsistent freeze temperatures, varying moisture content, and differing soil types can result in variable strength gains. If water continuously flows through the ground, freezing may be inhibited, thus requiring more energy to maintain the desired state. Additionally, frost heave in fine silts and clays can pose risks if not properly managed, potentially leading to increased permeability after thaw. Handling these challenges requires careful planning and execution .
Ground freezing can be adapted to different excavation site conditions by varying the design of freeze pipe installations. For example, freeze pipes can be installed nearly horizontal or at various angles using directional drilling techniques to accommodate site-specific constraints and configurations. It is also possible to adjust the depth and configuration of the frozen barrier to control uplift and other factors, making it suitable for both small and large sites as well as for use beneath existing structures. These adaptations make ground freezing versatile and effective for diverse excavation environments .
For shallow excavations, ground freezing offers several cost advantages over traditional methods such as sheet piles or soldier pile walls. It eliminates the need for internal bracing and dewatering systems, allowing for stable shoring and seamless groundwater cutoff. The method is competitive up to depths of about 40 feet and is particularly cost-effective on sites where the establishment of natural groundwater cutoffs is difficult or impossible. This reduces costs associated with materials and labor typically required for conventional shoring techniques .
Ground freezing is considered environmentally safe and advantageous because it does not involve introducing foreign materials into the ground, such as chemical grouts or concrete, which can contaminate soil and water. The use of closed systems, particularly with non-toxic substances like calcium chloride brine, ensures that no harmful materials leak into the environment. Additionally, the process is reversible; once the freezing is no longer necessary, the soil returns to its natural state, reducing long-term environmental impact .
The presence of groundwater significantly affects the design of a ground freezing project because the freezing process depends on water to create ice, which cements soil particles. If the ground is saturated, it becomes impermeable, leading to increased strength. Conversely, if there is insufficient water, additional water may need to be introduced. The continuous flow of groundwater can inhibit freezing by providing a constant source of heat, which requires greater refrigeration efforts to establish the frozen barrier. Thus, controlling groundwater flow is crucial to effectively implement and maintain ground freezing .
Ground freezing can manage groundwater contamination by creating a frozen soil wall that acts as a barrier, preventing the migration of contaminants into sensitive areas such as streams and lakes. This barrier is impermeable, containing the spread of pollutants and protecting natural water sources. The maintenance costs of a buried frozen soil cutoff are relatively low, making it a competitive choice for long-term environmental protection strategies. This application prevents further contamination while rehabilitation measures are implemented .
The two main types of refrigeration systems for ground freezing are conventional systems and cryogenic systems. Conventional systems use a refrigerant gas like ammonia, which is compressed and transfers its cold energy to calcium chloride brine that circulates through the freeze tube system. This type is suitable for large projects with long durations. Cryogenic systems, on the other hand, use liquid nitrogen as an expendable refrigerant, directly applied to freeze tubes and evaporating at -196 degrees Celsius. They are more suited for shorter project durations as they provide a swift setup but can be expensive due to the high consumption of liquid nitrogen .
Cryogenic ground freezing is preferred in situations where the construction period is short and requires rapid soil stabilization, such as in tunneling beneath bodies of water or in urban settings where minimal disruption and speed are critical. This method is advantageous due to its ability to quickly establish a frozen barrier using liquid nitrogen, which evaporates at very low temperatures (-196 degrees Celsius). It is effectively used where immediate or temporary stabilization is needed, although it is more costly compared to conventional methods due to the consumption of expendable refrigerants .
Ground freezing effectively reduces the need for dewatering by creating an impermeable frozen barrier around the excavation site, which prevents groundwater from infiltrating the excavation area. By sealing off the site from groundwater, it allows large and shallow excavations to be conducted 'in the dry,' eliminating the necessity for dewatering systems that can be costly to install and operate. Furthermore, avoiding dewatering reduces the environmental impact and logistical complexity, potentially lowering overall project costs compared to conventional methods .
