GariBibatstabbedtodeathoneLloyddelRosariowhoisonhiswayto
schoolonOctober12,1992ataround1:30p.m.alongG.Tuazoncor.Ma.
CristinaSts.,Sampaloc,Manila.Thereafterthesuspectfledwhilethe
victimwasbroughttotheUnitedDoctorsMedicalCenter(UDMC)where
hewaspronounceddeadonarrival.
The incident was witnessed by Nona Avila Cinco, that while she was at
FunerariaGloriawaitingforherbettor,shesawapersonaboutonemeteraway
talking to the accused.Said person told the accused O pare, anduon
na.Puntahanmona.Siguruhinmolangnaitumbamona.towhichtheaccused
answered:Ooba.Ganitoba,ganitoba?(asthewitnesswasspeaking,shewas
demonstratingwithherarms.)
ISSUE
Whetherthereisevidentpremeditation
RULING
we are of the irresistible conclusion that the attendance of evident
premeditation to qualify the killing complained of to murder is borne out by the
evidence.
There is evident premeditation when the following requisites are met:
1.Thetimewhentheoffenderdetermined(conceived)to
committhecrime;
2.Anactmanifestlyindicatingthattheculprithasclungtohis
determination;and
3.Asufficientlapseoftimebetweenthedeterminationand
executiontoallowhimtoreflectupontheconsequencesofhisact.
[17]
The essence of premeditation is that the execution of the criminal act is
preceded by cool thought and reflection upon the resolution to carry out the
criminal intent during the space of time sufficient to arrive at a calm judgment.
[18]
The appellant, in his brief, implies that the first requisite of evident
premeditation was not sufficiently proven, contending, that:
xxxtheaggravatingcircumstanceofevidentpremeditationwasappreciated
bythetrialcourtbasedsolelyonthetestimonyofwitnessRogelio
Robles.Thesaidwitnesstestifiedthataccusedappellantandseveralothers
oftenmetinhis(RogelioRobles)house.Inoneoftheirmeetings,accused
appellantandhiscompanionshidsomegunsandtusokinthesaidwitness
house.Otherthanthesetestimonies,thetrialcourtprofferednoother
rationaletojustifytheapplicationofevidentpremeditation.
[19]